Tag: resolution

  • Lawmaker seeks resolution of Ondo APC crisis

    The lawmaker representing Idanre/Ifedore Federal Constituency of Ondo State, Bamidele Baderinwa (White), has called for quick resolution of the internal crisis within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).

    He sought the reconciliation of disputes occasioned by the recent congresses ahead of the party’s national convention.

    Baderinwa, who was among those allegedly attacked by suspected political thugs during the recent parallel APC state congress in Akure, the state capital, addressed reporters at Ero in Ifedore Local Government Area.

    The lawmaker emphasised that the crisis that rocked the ward, local government and state congresses across the country could cost the ruling APC next year’s elections, if not properly managed.

    He said: “I cannot imagine a situation where members who work in line with the party’s guidelines for congress are denied lawful participation by hoarding nomination forms by those who ascribed the ownership of APC to themselves alone.

    “This act was purely undemocratic, even when these card carrying members were attacked by hired thugs and suffered various degrees of injury and humiliations from supposed same party members.”

    Baderinwa decried the circumstances that followed various parallel congresses in many states, a situation he described as unsuitable for the fortune of the ruling party.

    The APC chieftain urged the National Working Committee (NWC) to treat the various appeals by aggrieved members with sincerity and transparency.

    He said: “We are pleading with the leadership of APC to take the issue seriously and do something reasonable to correct these anomalies and put the party in the right path ahead of the national convention in June and the 2019 polls.”

     

  • Resolution on Idris a witch-hunt, say Police

    INSPECTOR General Ibrahim Idris has described the resolution by the Senate as a blackmail, mischievous and very unfortunate.

    Contrary to the claim that the IG refused to honour the third invitation by the Senate without notice, he said a letter was sent yesterday to the Senate President stating why he could not be present.

    The police boss said he would not be deterred by blackmail from any individual or group no matter how highly placed.

    Idris added that he owes no apology to any individual or groups in his effort to ensure preservation of law and order, supremacy of the law and make sure that Nigerians are subjected to the same law; no matter what their positions are.

    A statement in Abuja yesterday by the Force spokesman, Jimoh Moshood, an Assistant Commissioner of Police, said because the Inspector-General was on official assignments on the dates he was invited, he delegated the Deputy Inspector-General of Police, Department of Operations, Assistant Inspector-Generals of Police and some Commissioners of Police conversant with the matter to brief the Senate.

    “The delegated officers went with a brief of the Inspector-General of Police on the matter to the Senate to enable the Senate appreciate the issues raised to guide their resolutions on the matter but the Senate refused to listen to the officers delegated by the Inspector-General of Police in line with his powers recognised by both the Constitution and the Police Act and Regulations.

    The statement explained: “On May 8, 2018, the Inspector General of Police sent a letter to the Senate President signed by the Commissioner of Police, Legal and Prosecution Department, explaining why he would not be appearing before the Senate on May 9, 2018, due to legal restraint as a result of pending cases before the courts filed: (i) by Senator Dino Melaye against the IGP and the Nigeria Police Force in the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja,” which was adjourned to May 31 for hearing.

    It added: “The action of the Senate in its resolution against the IGP today is a deliberate blackmail, witch-hunting with mischievous motives to hand-twist the IGP to pervert the end of justice in a felonious and serious offences of Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Possession of Prohibited Firearms for which Senator Dino Melaye, who was indicted by two principal suspects (Kabiru Seidu A.K.A Osama, Nuhu Salisu A.K.A Small) arrested for several cases of kidnappings and armed robberies in Kogi State are already standing trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.

    “It is important to correct the impression created in the minds of the people from the Senate’s resolution that the IGP is not and will not be an enemy to democracy. It is also of significant note to state that IGP Ibrahim K. Idris, NPM, mni, has served meritoriously for above 10 years in the United Nations Peace Keeping Operations in several countries unblemished. The Nigeria Police Force is the first defender of democracy and all democratic institutions in Nigeria and will continue to do so.

    “It is factual and verifiable that Melaye was discharged and certified fit to stand trial by the National Hospital, Abuja, before he was arraigned in Chief Magistrate Courts in Wuse, Abuja and Lokoja.

    “The Inspector General of Police and the Nigeria Police Force will not be deterred by blackmail from any individual or group no matter how highly placed from the enforcement of law and order and ensuring that the Rule of Law prevails no matter whose ox is gored.

    “The Nigeria Police Force, therefore, owes no apology to any individual or groups in its effort to ensure preservation of law and order, supremacy of the law of the land, and make sure that all Nigerians are subject to the same law, no matter what their position is in the society.

    “The public are hereby implored to disregard and discountenance the resolution of the Senate on the IG as a deliberate blackmail, witch-hunting and mischievously aimed at casting aspersions on the hard earned integrity of the Inspector General of Police and the Nigeria Police Force.”

  • APC crises resolution: Oyegun pledges to back Tinubu

    APC crises resolution: Oyegun pledges to back Tinubu

    National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, yesterday promised to support Asiwaju Bola Tinubu in the presidential mandate to reconcile the warring sides in the ruling party.

    Moments after emerging from a meeting with President Muhammadu Buhari at the Aso Rock Villa,Abuja,Oyegun dispatched a letter to Tinubu in response to the February 21 memo from the former Lagos State governor.

    Tinubu had accused the APC chair of frustrating reconciliation efforts in the party taking “improper unilateral decisions” on issues affecting national and state chapters.

    Oyegun,he alleged, had refused to cooperate by delaying the release of information critical to the resolution of crises in state chapters.

    Tinubu in his letter entitled  “Actions and conduct weakening the party from within said while the chairman had allowed the crises in the chapters to fester by his refusal to take appropriate actions, his decision to take some “inappropriate unilateral decisions” in recent times in the affected chapters had created fresh difficulties for the reconciliation process.

    However,Oyegun in a three  paragraph  reply to Tinubu yesterday said: “I thank you for your letter dated February 21, 2018, for your prayers and good wishes for my health. I wish you the same and pray that our good God keeps you strong and grants you His peace.

    “Let me once again formally congratulate you on the peace making assignment Mr. President has entrusted you with. It is most challenging but I believe you will ultimately justify the confidence reposed in you by Mr President. In this you have my fullest support.

    “Be assured, dear Asiwaju, of my highest regards now and always.”

    He was silent on the issues raised by Tinubu in his own memo.

    Oyegun was at the villa earlier in the day to confer with Buhari apparently on Tinubu’s letter,copies of which he had sent to the President,Vice President Yemi Osinbajo,Senate President Bukola Saraki and House of Representatives Speaker Yakubu Dogara.

    It is believed yesterday’s  meeting was to enable  the party chairman explain his own side of the story to the president.

    Odigie-Oyegun arrived the Presidential Villa at about 3pm and left at about 3.50pm.

    Apparently aware that State House correspondents would seek his reaction to the letter, he cleverly  avoided them.

    As soon as he sighted the journalists who were waiting for him at their operational base inside the Council Chambers Briefing Room, Odigie-Oyegun increased his pace as he was finding his way out of the premises.

    Governor  Yahaya Bello of Kogi State , on Thursday night hailed the wisdom of President Muhammadu Buhari in appointing Tinubu to reconcile aggrieved members of the party.

    Speaking with State House journalists at the end of APC governors’ meeting with the President at the Presidential Villa, he said that the governors also have confidence in the leadership of the National Chairman, John Odigie-Oyegun.

    On the allegation by Asiwaju Bola Tinubu to the President that the party’s national Chairman was frustrating his reconciliation efforts, Bello said “We the governors and majority of APC members have confidence ?in our national chairman Chief John Oyegun, we also believe in President by appointing Bola Tinubu, our leader to reconcile some aggrieved members of our party.

    “However, one size fits all will not work in all the states where some erring members need to be disciplined.” he said.

  • 18-year Mobil, employees’ dispute nears resolution

    18-year Mobil, employees’ dispute nears resolution

    The Supreme Court has reserved judgment for April 20 in the case of 860 Nigerians employed by Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited. What will be their fate? ERIC IKHILAE reviews the case.

    About eight years after Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited lodged an appeal at the Supreme Court against the May 21, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeal, Calabar, ordering it to accept responsibility for the 860 Nigerians it employed as security guards, the apex court has scheduled judgment for April 20 this year.

    The judgment will put to rest the about 18-year-old dispute on the status of the 860 Nigerians and the pains and misery to which they have been subjected since the company disengaged them under questionable circumstances when the dispute began.

    Court documents revealed that the Nigerian workers were variously employed in early 1990s by Mobil in its security unit. But for unknown reasons, the company chose to refer to them as: “SPY Police of Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited,” a decision that later created confusion over the actual status of the workers.

    On January 23, this year, a panel of five Justices of the Supreme Court, led by Justice Bode Rhodes-Vivour, chose April 20, 2018 for judgment after parties had argued and adopted their written briefs of argument in respect to the appeal marked: SC/33/2010 lodged by Mobil.

    Named as 1st to 15th respondents in the appeal (representing the 860 Nigerians) are Okon Johnson; Nkereuwem Akpe; Nsitighe Ikpam; Calistus Nwafor; Emmanuel Nwokezi; Eric Teenwi; Affiong Etim; Amangi Ala; Joseph Bamishaye; Godwin Tombra; Charles Okon; Dada Rotimi; Raji Lateef; Taiwo Laidi and Opubo Sukubo.

    Other respondents, listed as 16th, 17th and 18th, are the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Commissioner of Police, Akwa Ibom State and the Nigeria Police Council (NPC).

    Kayode Sofola, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN),  adopted the appellant’s briefs on January 23 this year, urged the court to allow his client’s appeal and set aside the May 21 judgment of the Court of Appeal, Calabar, which held among others, that it was wrong for Mobil to seek to evade its responsibility in relation to the 860 Nigerians, by claiming that they were employees of the Nigeria Police Force.

    Sofola insisted that the Nigerians, including the 15 listed in court papers (as representing the others) were supernumerary police officers, because they were administered the oath of allegiance, dressed in police uniform, availed all other police paraphernalia and trained by the police.

    He noted that the Nigerian workers described themselves, in one of their affidavits, as supernumerary police officers, which amounted to an admission that they were not employees of his client.

    Sofola also faulted the mode of commencing the case at the trial court, which he said, led to the denial of fair hearing to his client.

    In his notice of objection, Sofola argued that since the facts in the case were hotly disputed, the suit ought not to have been commenced by way of originating summons. He said the mode of commencing the suit denied his client the opportunity to lead oral evidence to support its claims.

    In a contrary argument, lawyer to the 1st to 15 respondents, Femi Falana (SAN) faulted Sofola’s claim that his clients were denied fair hearing.   He argued that there was nowhere in the appellant’s brief any evidence to show that its right to fair hearing was violated.

    Falana noted that the appellant did not, at the Court of Appeal, challenged the mode with which the suit was commenced at the trial court and could not now do so at the apex court. He added that the argument on fair hearing and the case cited by Sofola in support were irrelevant to the case.

    On the status of his clients, Falana argued that Sofola failed to provide any evidence that Mobil complied with the laid down procedure for the appointment of SPY policemen by the Nigeria Police Force.

    He noted that Mobil admitted that it conducted examination for the employment of the applicants at the trail court (the Nigerian workers), issued them with employment letters, sent them to the police for training and continued to pay their salaries through the police.

    Falana said: “It was Mobil Producing the conducted the examination for those they wanted to employment as security guards. Those, who passed, were issued employment letters by the company, but later sent to Police College, Calabar.

    As against the claim by Sofola that the Nigerians earn their salaries from the Nigeria Police Force, Falana argued that the salaries of the Nigerians were paid by  Mobil, but through the police.

    He added: “When this question arose, as to the status of the 1 – 15 respondents, the IGP clarified the issue that the responsibilities of Police regarding the SPY is mainly on training, upon the request of the employer.

    “On the face of the letter of employment, salaries and allowances paid by the appellant (Mobil) through the police, the findings of the lower court (Court of Appeal, Calabar) cannot be faulted.

    “The procedure for the application for SPY requires that an application be sent to the IGP, who will send it to the President for approval. That requirement was not complied with,” Falana said.

    He urged the court to reject the appeal and uphold the earlier decision of the Court of Appeal, Calabar on the issue.

    Lawyer to the IGP, Commissioner of Police, Akaw Ibom and NPC, Sebastian Ozoani did not file any process in response to the appeal, but did so in respect of the appeal by his clients, marked: SC/378/2010.

    Ozoani, while arguing his client’s appeal, faulted the contract between Mobil and the Nigerians. He, also faulted the letter of employment issued to them by Mobil.

    He said the letters did not contain the necessary elements required globally to qualify them (the employment letters) as valid ones.

    He urged the court to hold that the workers (listed as 2nd to 16th defendants in the second appeal) are employees of the Nigeria Police.

    In a counter argument, Falana argued that the appeal by the police lacked merit and was intended to waste the court’s time.

    Falana noted that the IGP, Commissioner of Police, Akwa Ibom State and NPC did not file any process when the case was before the Court of Appeal.

    He contended that “the case is about private contract between the 1st res and the 2nd to 16 res. It has nothing to do with the police. The IGP has said the police has no business with them beyond training them”.

    In 2000 a dispute arose about the status of the security guards, with Mobil claiming to have transferred their employment to the Nigeria Police Force (NPF). Mobil claimed it engaged them as SPY police personnel, and not actual staff; a claim the affected workers disputed, with some of them refusing to be transferred out of their stations.

    They alleged being victimised, with some sacked unceremoniously for insisting on right to being entitled to be treated as other employees of Mobil. They alleged that, aside from being subjected to harsh working condition, they were compelled to sign a document identified as “Mobil Producing Nigeria status agreement for supernumerary police service condition agreement.”

    The workers said although some of them succumbed and endorsed the documents, others stood their ground, and later sought the protection of the court by filing a suit at the Federal High Court, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, marked: FHC/UY/CS/2004.

    In a judgment on January 24, 2006, Justice Gladys Olotu ruled in favour of Mobil. The judge said, among others, that although the Mobil did not fully comply with the requirement under the Police Act, in recruiting SPY policemen, it could be assumed that it complied, having substantially complied with some of the regulations

    The Nigerian workers appealed Justice Olotu’s decision at the Court of Appeal, Calabar, Cross River State, which rendered its judgment  on May 21, 2009 a nullity.

    A three-man panel of the Appeal Court, in its May 21, 2009 judgment, held among others, that the Nigerian workers were Mobil’s employees and ordered it to assume its responsibilities as they relate to the Nigerian workers. The panel comprised Justice Kumai Akaahs, Jean Omokri and Theresa Orji-Abadua.

    Justice Orji-Abadua observed, in the lead judgment, that: “It is clear in exhibits D and E (Mobil’s letters to the Police, requesting training for its security recruit) that the 1st respondent (Mobil) was referring to their own security men as Supernumerary Police recruit, and it wanted them to be trained by the Nigeria Police in respect of which it made application to the Commissioner of Police in charge of Cross River State.

    “In exhibit F (a November 1, 1996 letter by Mobil’s Security Advisor, B. O. B. Duke), the 1st respondent requested the Commissioner of Police to recruit its security personnel into the Police Supernumerary outfit.

    “It is clear therein that as at the date exhibit F was written, the appellants (the affected staff) had not, according to the 1st respondent, been recruited as supernumerary police officers.

    “It is also clear, in exhibit C2, that it is the 1st respondent, in the figment of its imagination and its hallucinating state, that offered the appellants employment in its security unit and described them as SPY Constables.

    “It is clear as crystal, in the processes filed before the lower court (Federal High Court) and the documents exhibited, that the 1st respondent and officers of the 2nd to 4th respondents (IGP, Akwa Ibom State Police Commissioner and Nigeria Police Council) were oblivious of the requirement of the law or its stipulations in so far as the requirements, employment/appointment of supernumerary police officers were concerned.

    “Undoubtedly, the hood does not make a monk. The fact that the appellants were described as SPY Police Mobil Producing Nigeria and were adorned with Nigeria Police uniforms and other paraphernalia cannot make them Nigeria policemen.

    “As a matter of fact, the appellants were made to believe they were being recruited into the Security Unit of the 1st respondent as the SPY police of Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited, but not as Nigeria Supernumerary Police officers,” she said.

    Justice Orji-Abadua further held that it was immaterial whether or not the appellants thought they were Nigeria Police SPY, and that what confers the status of a police on a person is not the wearing of uniform or being called a police, but the process of the person’s recruitment in accordance with the law creating his employment.

    She noted that: “Section 18(1) & (2) of the Police Act expressly stated the way and manner a supernumerary police officer will be appointed upon the application of the person desiring to take advantage of the services of police for protection of his property. It is clear that any step short of the ones prescribed by the Police Act will be null and void.

    “The appellants were not employed by the Nigeria Police Force and then appointed as Supernumerary Police Officers by the Police Service Commission on the directive of the Inspector general of Police for the protection of the 1st respondent’s property as envisaged by Section 18(1) & (2) of the Police Act.

    “They were and still are the employees of the 1st respondent since there was no affidavit evidence indicating that the appellants’ employment had been determined by the 1st respondent,” Justice Orji-Abadua said.

    It is this Court of Appeal’s decision that Mobil appealed to the Supreme Court and on which judgment has been reserved for April 20, this year.

  • The 2017 Resolution South East Should Make

    It is usual for people to have resolutions with the arrival of a New Year and the several groups claiming to represent the interests of the Igbo nation in southeast Nigeria would do well to announce realistic resolutions for the year 2017. The resolutions should centre around advancing the geo-ethnic agenda without engaging in acts that amount to self harming. Self harming is precisely what all the groups –IPOB, BIM, MASSOB – that agitated for Igbo interests did in the preceding years.
    Less than one week into the year it became apparent that the mistakes of 2016 would be repeated wholesale with the one month ultimatum issued by the Biafra National Guard, BNG, for the release of IPOB (Indigenous People of Biafra) leader, Nnamdi Kanu failing which they will attack the government. It is inconceivable that one Ruben Okoro signed the statement issuing a threat to commit treason in his capacity as Public Relations Officer of BNG.
    A few things are lost on these characters here. First, one does not threaten to attack a constitutionally installed government and not expect the relevant security institutions to act regardless of whether the southeast voted against that government enbloc; other nationals will hold the government responsible if it does not treat the BNG avowal to attack seriously. Secondly, committing a crime in pursuit of forcing the government to release suspected insurgent from detention will inevitably attract repercussions. Furthermore, the notion of being ‘freedom fighters’ as these element want to portray themselves does not arise; they waived their right to use that label from the moment they began the expression of their grievances from the point of attrition as opposed to dialogue.
    Part of the self harm being done in the region is such that people are not even able to objectively assess issues anymore. The Nigerian Army for instance launched Operation Python Dance in the southeast during the Yuletide and while it generated goodwill for the institution as it helped to curb the activities of criminals during the period, BNG’s best input is to parody it. In the fixation to attack the state and the army the antagonists failed to realize that their geo-political zone celebrated Christmas and New Year without being under siege from kidnappers and robbers as was the case in the past. Much as the separatist elements are in denial. Fortunately, the leaders of thought from the area inundated the Nigerian Army with accolades – governors, traditional rulers and clergymen were full of appreciation to the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), Lt Gen. TY Buratai during a short working visit to the southeast. They showed the power of intellectual approach to issues.
    Tragically, this capacity to approach issues intellectually using dialogue is one that is lacking among those agitating to commit crimes as one increasingly sees ethnic jingoists that cannot even make meaningful contributions to national debates online without resorting to calling Nigeria a ‘zoo’ and other ethnic nationals dismissed as ‘animals in the zoo’. It is therefore not surprising that even the CSOs and NGOs pursuing the Igbo interest have taken on aggressive stance that has left them increasingly militarized like the other separatists groups.Even some groups that were hitherto nationalistic in outlook have been hijacked by ethnic warriors as in Campaign for Democracy (CD) that has now been reduced to a southeastern mouthpiece.
    The devious intent for hijacking such NGOs can be seen in the use of CD to claim that 2000 persons have been killed by the state. No such deaths occurred anywhere and just like their counterparts in Amnesty International who claimed 150 deaths, the sudden jump in the figures given by CD has exposed the purposeful and deliberate disdain for federal authorities.
    A statement issued by CD’s national publicity secretary, Dede Uzor, which made that claim made a futile attempt at looking nationalistic by exploiting the Southern Kaduna killings. One can only hope that the request to include IPOB and MASSOB members in the panel to investigate the Kaduna killings has nothing to do with attempts to cover up the allegations that some persons of Igbo ancestry fought as mercenaries on the side of the rampaging herders.
    That demand for the National Assembly to include IPOB and MASSOB members on the investigative panel exposes the delusion that is prevalent among these separatist groups whose members hallucinate about their phantom acceptability as mainstream entities. What parliament in the world would hobnob with insurgents? If that demand was meant as a devious way of worming their way into legitimacy then is dead on arrival. The best members of these outlaw groups can hope for from the National Assembly is for some selected lawmakers that would negotiate lesser punishments for their errant members.
    There is a lesson for all the separatists groups in the southeast – IPOB, MASSOB, BIM, BNG, CD and just any other acronym that will join the growing list – Boko Haram fanatics started out with the same delusion of righteous sense of hurt but eventually ended up as something the entire world is eager to hear the last about. From the way the various separatists groups are behaving it is a matter of time before they attempt staging spectacular attacks as face saving measures once Nigerians begin to realize their threats are empty.
    God forbid that things get to such sorry pass since the response to such provocation would be no lesser than the one given to Boko Haram. The difference would be that with the benefit of experience no one would wait until they get out of hand before acting.
    It is therefore time for the Nigerian state to call time on this nonsense and say enough of the IPOB, MASSOB, BNG, and BIM distraction. They cannot threaten the government with a 30 day ultimatum for the release of Nnamdi Kanu who is facing trial before a competent court of law. If things were to work the way they are demanding then the clan members of every armed robber apprehended by law enforcement agents would threaten to bring the country down like these groups.
    The lot therefore falls to the so-called human rigths NGOs, whether local or international should hold seminars and workshops to educate these would be hooligans what sovereignty means and the consequence of their action should they take up arms against the state. The separatist groups on their own should re-assess their option; perhaps they will come to the realisation that their current choices are hurting more than helping their interests. This should be their New Year resolution.

    Odoma is President, Africa Arise for Change Network and contributed this piece from Abuja.‎

  • National resolution for 2017 and beyond (2)

    National resolution for 2017 and beyond (2)

    While our primary challenge as a nation is the weakness of institutional structures, there is hardly a doubt that this is itself linked to our cultural predilection for misplaced priorities in the arena of values. When our warped values endorse, but institutions condemn, to us, that’s just too bad for institutions. That is how we have carried on, at least in the last thirty something years.

    Consider the following personal narrative which I had shared in this column before. After successfully completing the Secondary Modern School in December 1960, and not having secured admission for further education, I was hired as a pupil teacher by the late Chief I. A. Adelodun, the headmaster of First Baptist School, Isia, Okeho, to teach his class because, as headmaster, he had assigned himself a class while he was also an Honourable Member of the Western Region House of Assembly. He paid my salary of £5 per month from his pocket.

    I would like to highlight a few salient points from this story. First, membership of parliaments in the First Republic was not considered a full-time job and members were expected to keep their day jobs. How they managed the two was between them and their conscience on the one hand, and between them and their constituencies on the other. But where any of them might have a weak conscience, their constituencies did not let them get away with cheating.

    Second, because of the combination of a strong conscience on the part of many of those legislators and political appointees and uncompromising constituencies who monitored them, the values of hard work and honesty were preserved. Therefore, when in those days, we taught children J. F. Odunjo’s immortal lines “Ise logun ise” (work is the antidote to poverty), it resonated with them. When we taught them the lyrics “Bi mo ba ka we mi, bata mi a ro koko ka...” (If I am well-read, I am on the road to comfort), they were motivated, for they were witnesses to the stories of “rag to riches” because of education.

    Third, however, those values have suffered disastrously in the face of newly discovered vices of indolence, dishonesty and selfish greed that have unfortunately been promoted and celebrated as modern values. A headmaster could not have done otherwise than Chief Adelodun did in those days. His conscience would not allow him even if he wanted. And the parents and school authorities would not have condoned an absentee teacher.

    Now, however, we have some headmasters without other official jobs not only absenting themselves from their stations, but also condoning teacher absences. We have teachers seated in their boutiques three days a week at the expense of their students and getting paid at the end of the month. Far more serious is the contemporary phenomena of ghost teachers and ghost workers. We have evolved tragically in our embrace of greed and dishonesty as a new national value. And it appears we are not letting prudential considerations obstruct our dangerous sprint toward the edge of the cliff.

    Fourth, but who are we to blame the crooked tail when the head is itself wobbly? The teacher in his classroom, the headmistress in her office and the clerk in his cubicle, are all variants of a mini iromi. They all dance to despicable beats coming from the drums of selfish greed and economic sabotage. It’s surreal. Legislators pass bills for their self-aggrandisement. They vote to give themselves raises even when they know that there are no funds to repair roads or provide potable water for their constituencies. They allocate to themselves funds for constituency projects but heaven helps anyone that tries to find the location of such projects in the constituencies. In the age of twitter and snapchat, the teacher, the headmaster and the clerk are very much aware of what’s going on in the corridors of power. They are naturally, therefore, cynical about sermons that tell them to be the change they want to see.

    Fifth, as a corporate entity, we have lived our entire life spending beyond our means with an insatiable appetite for borrowing to finance our flamboyant lifestyle. We have never cut our national coat according to the size of our clothes. And because our productivity has not met up with, let alone overtake our consumption, we are in constant debt to other nations from which we import to satisfy our wants.

    Though we can live comfortably without much of what we import, our vulgar wants must be fulfilled. And the big ones among us are in the lead for these desires of the flesh. So, the driver is an insider to the boss’ lifestyle and he cannot wait to have what Oga has. What course is open to him? Theft or conspiracy to kidnap Oga’s kids! In the economies that we envy, individuals go about in jeans and T-shirts, while saving for education, home, nutritious food and vacation. We go into debt for aso-ebi.

    Sixth, while there are certain cultural values that have been passed on to us from our forebears and which we rightly think of as morally obligated of us to continue, we have, without much thought, taken them to insane heights. Naming of newly born, wedding and funeral represent the three most important landmarks of a person worthy of celebration. But while tradition recognises this, it does not impose on us an obligation to go into debt in recognising them. Unfortunately, this is what many folks have done, cheered on by the rest of us. We make feferity, apology to the late Chief Anthony Enahoro, our cultural pride, without the necessary constraint to rein in its excesses.

    Seventh, meanwhile, we hold government responsible for our normal parental responsibilities without even bothering to do our part. Besides civil servants and private sector employees, who are forced to part with taxable portions of their incomes through the PAYEE system, it is only a few conscientious ones that pay taxes these days because we assume that there is oil revenue to take care of our national wants. And when there is lull in the oil market giving rise to recession, we grumble.

    Eighth, as citizens, we aid and abet corruption with our inordinate and greedy demands from government and from candidates and elected officials. It is a rational law of economics that one invests to make profit. Therefore, when the electorate demand and receive gratification from candidates to give the candidates their support rather than support their positions on issues which would benefit them in return, those candidates are rational to consider the bribe they give voters as investment from which they must make reasonable profit. Do we then really have a good reason to complain when on getting to office, those elected officials dip their hands in the coffers of government?

    Ninth, from the immediate prior paragraph, it seems clear that big-time corruption, the type that involves politicians in 10 figure theft of public funds, has its root in the petty corruption initiated by the electorate. The victim may have been the culprit in the first place. Without recognising the impact of citizen demand and the culture that tolerates it, we are not going to resolve the big problem. More importantly, without dealing with the cultural ethos that celebrate undeserved opulence, and the perverse values that thwart our original belief in the wealth that comes from hard work, we are not going to successfully confront and win the war against corruption.

    Finally, we may then ask the question: what should be our national resolution for 2017 and beyond? First, we must create strong institutions that can withstand the onslaught of political jobbers parading as patriots. Second, we must reverse the vice of conspicuous consumption and vanity that presents itself as a fundamental cultural value. Third, we must affirm once again the truth that hard work is the antidote to poverty and teach the coming generations the same. Fourth, let us truly and in practical terms adhere to the declaration of our norm with a firm embrace of discipline, integrity, dignity of labour, social justice, religious tolerance, self-reliance and patriotism.

    • Concluded

     

     

  • National resolution for 2017 and beyond (1)

    National resolution for 2017 and beyond (1)

    Nigeria enters 2017 in a bad shape, perhaps, its worst economic meltdown since the oil glut of the 1980s led to harsh austerity measures. With divine intervention, the country survived that period but learnt nothing from it. History has thus repeated itself.

    I just attributed to divine intervention the nation’s survival of harsh conditions when, all things being equal, she should have collapsed. I could have cited chance or sheer luck. But it feels good to be reassured of a superior being’s interest in our survival.

    As a former leader put the matter recently, Nigeria was created by God and God does not make mistakes, and the one who created the nation will not stand by to see her crumble. The God who has been our help in ages past is still our hope for years to come. If so, the various agitators for her collapse and disintegration in favour of more homogenous artifices may be wasting their efforts! Unless, of course, God changes His mind.

    And change of mind is always a possibility for the divine who is self-controlled and owes none any explanation. Paradoxically, however, were a survey of Nigerians conducted today, a sizeable majority would favour a change of mind on God’s part, with preference for a dissolution of the God-officiated marriage by which the many became one. The reason is not far-fetched. They are tired of a country that is endowed with the potential for greatness, but has settled for smallness its entire life.

    It’s no use cautioning cynics against impatience. They have been patient for more than half a century. It is counterproductive to counsel them against the unknown. They rationally respond that when the known poses an imminent threat to personal survival, the unknown cannot be worse. And there is little doubt that as it is presently constituted and operating, this nation poses an imminent threat to the survival of many of her citizens and residents. Just go to the street corners and the dung hills and you will find tears rolling down your face for God’s creatures. A loving God will change His mind in a jiffy.

    But the good news is that it can be fixed, provided the root cause is recognised and dealt with sincerely. If Nigeria was created for greatness and if the greatness of the nation was to have a multiplier effect on the citizens, there must be a formula that the original author, who provided that, has been abandoned at some point. The remedy is to find it and apply it once again.

    Let me suggest the following reasoning to find that formula: The greatness of a nation is a function of the goodness of its people. Therefore, for a nation to be great, it must have good people. But the goodness of the people is a function of the goodness of their leaders. Therefore, there must be good leaders. However, the goodness of leaders is a function of the strength of the institutions which create them and monitor them. Therefore, there must be strong institutions. Ultimately then, for a nation to be great, it must have strong institutions.

    What is an institution? It is a system of rules and practices established for the purpose of efficient and effective governance. Strong institutions produce good servant leaders and prevent the emergence of leaders that see the nation as their personal estate. Strong institutions prevent the abuse of power.

    Consider the case of electoral institutions, a pillar of democratic system of government. With a weak system of rules and practices governing elections, electoral corruption is unavoidable. For the better part of her life, this nation had a corrupt electoral system. It was the immediate cause of the first military incursion into politics and it nearly caused the disintegration of the nation.

    We did not learn from that near-death experience which we repeated during the Second Republic, leading again to another military takeover. When finally we appeared to get something right about electoral system in 1993, the personalised rule of the military ensured that it never worked. The institution of the military, which produced strong leaders for the purpose of the defence of the country from external attack, found itself being asked to respect the institution of “bloody civilian” elections. The tail wagged the dog and it also nearly led to the disintegration of the country.

    Since the beginning of the Fourth Republic, we have seen the rise and fall of institutional structures which had not been designed well to withstand the assault of egoistic leaders who prefer personal rule to the rule of law. From the Police to EFCC, from Code of Conduct Bureau to INEC, each has been tools in the hands of those they were supposed to rein in. It is not just at the federal level. The states and local governments are veritable grounds for the emasculation of institutions, including the judiciary, whose independence is constitutionally guaranteed. The latter has sadly been exposed as corruption-ridden.

    The country has indeed been subjected to the ridiculous competition between the executive and the legislature in the matter of controlling governing institutions. Witness the ongoing effort on the part of the National Assembly to cow the Code of Conduct Bureau.

    Surely, there is always self-interest and self-preservation lurking around the corridors of power. Just as I write this column, a news flash appeared on my screen. The Republican Congress in the United States voted to gut an independent ethics law that Democrats had put in place after a series of scandals some years ago. Republicans who now control Congress and the White House wanted Congress to control the Independent Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE). But what happened? There was an avalanche of criticisms, including two tweets from the president-elect. Republicans had no choice but to bow to public opinion and reverse their decision just within 24 hours.

    Meanwhile, in our corner of the world, there is intense suffering in the land, with great anxiety for the future, and a frightening precursor to national upheaval which handouts cannot prevent. No human being is satisfied with the indignity of waiting for a handout from anyone. We are wired to be productive agents and not idle consumers. With good planning, strong educational and economic institutions assign people to tasks they are capable of performing without the intervention of god-fathers or god-mothers.

    Whenever they suffer from human-made problems, as in the United States economic recession of 2008, citizen resilience, combined with the smartness of good leaders bring them back up. This is why the U. S. unemployment rate is now 4.6%, the lowest in more than 10 years. Our economic institutions are weak because leaders either have little or no clue, or are encumbered by self-seeking gimmicks that preclude respect for the objective laws of economics.

    What then must be our national resolution for the year 2017?  From the experience of established democracies, we know that strong leaders produced by strong institutions risk a hostile backlash from the public when they attempt to weaken those institutions which have worked effectively and efficiently.

    We must collectively resolve, therefore, to create and sustain strong institutions of governance going forward. This is of course contingent upon our collective willingness to give the Nigerian experiment another chance. The leadership slogan of an indivisible entity is just that. Without a willingness on their part to build the institutions that will ensure its indivisibility, it is all going to be a mirage. But the indivisibility of a country must be the outcome of citizens’ reflection on its meaning and promise for them. It cannot be commanded from above.

    Assume then that there is the willingness to give the Nigerian project another chance. There must be individual and collective efforts to identify institutions that are required for democratic governance in a federal setting, and a determination to strengthen them. It will not be easy as the leaders at various levels may be tempted to place their self-interest above the national interest. They need to be persuaded to the side of reason. Otherwise, they must be shamed. No one is indispensable.

  • Stakeholders seek adoption of alternative dispute resolution

    The real estate industry has grown to become one of the most vibrant sectors of the nation’s economy, including that of Lagos State.

    This is why the infrastructural renewal policy of the government, including an increased public spending on capital projects has made Lagos State a destination of choice for both commercial and residential developers.

    However, owing to this high market demand and the potentials the sector holds, activities in the real estate sector has become susceptible to abuse by individuals who engage in nefarious and unconventional activities. This has often times led to conflict within the industry.

    But, this trend may soon be reversed. Last week, the Estate Agents Practitioners Association of Nigeria (EAPAN), in collaboration with the Lagos State Real Estate Transaction Department, (LASRETRAD), took steps to ensure an end to such happenings is put in place.

    At an annual Stakeholders’ Forum organised by LASRETRAD, themed: “Arbitration: A Better option To Dispute Resolution in Real Estate Practice,” Governor Akinwunmi Ambode, represented at the forum by his Special Adviser on Housing, Mrs. Aramide Giwanson, regretted that the number of court cases that the state’s Ministry of Housing has instituted as a result of issues arising from real estate transactions in recent times has not only become unprecedented, but also become a thorny issue. The forum aimed at proffering solutions to some anomalies in tenancy transactions in the state, the bulk of whose blame has been heaped on estate agents.

    “Therefore, the need to expeditiously dispose cases in order to sanitise and build confidence in the sector for the benefit of all stakeholders cannot be over-emphasised,” Ambode said.

    Addressing the forum, which held at the Adeyemi Bero Auditorium, Lagos State government Secretariat, Alausa, the state’s Commissioner for Housing, Gbolahan Lawal, said that in view of the importance of sector and its significant contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) of the country, it is imperative that activities in such a sector is adequately and properly regulated to enable it deliver at its optimum for the overall benefit of both practitioners and the entire citizenry. “In any human endeavour, conflict, misunderstanding and professional misconduct cannot be completely eliminated. This is more so in the course of real estate transactions,” he said, adding that the present administration’s desire for quick conflict resolution led to the pursuit of alternative dispute resolution in the current judicial system.

    The Guest Speaker, Mr. Juwon Adenuga, who is also an Estate Surveyor and Valuer, contended that with the understanding of disputes and resolution options, it could be taken for granted that the option of arbitration is better suited to resolve disputes than litigation. This is because it saves a lot of time and resources than going through the litigation process.

    He noted that intending and existing investors in the sector need the guidance of surveyors to make feasible and valuable decision before investing and even afterwards. This, according to Adenuga, is because investments in real estate are capital intensive and by implication, if proper discernment is not made, it can lead to huge losses on investments.

    “It’s important that incidents capable of resulting in financial losses are minimised. That is why disputes, being one of such incidents need to be resolved as efficiently as possible and it is in this regard one would see that arbitration is far better than litigation. It saves time, money and quickly restores healthy relationship among the contending parties,” Lawal noted.

    Adenuga also identified the various services provided in real estate practice to include valuation, feasibility and viability appraisal, projectproperty development, and noted that in the course of rendering these services, relationships are created, most of which are contractual and commercial in nature.

    The issue of estate agents and their role drew the greatest attention at the forum as a result of the several tenancy-related problems which has become a regular occurrence in urban cities.

    The President of the Nigerian Institution of Estate Surveyors and Valuers (NIESV), Dr. Bolarinde Patunola-Ajayi, while speaking at the forum, urged estate agents to flush out the bad eggs in their midst so as to save their profession. “Estate agency is more than business; it’s a profession and I urge the practitioners to see it as such. It’s our role as practitioners to collaborate with government to weed out fraudsters and quacks from the system. Let us uphold the code of conduct of our profession and sanitise it,” Patuola-Ajayi admonished.

    On his part, the President, Real Estate Agents in Nigeria, Mr. Kunle Adedeji, urged government to set up a monitoring team that will comprise of government officials and representative of various estate agent associations to serve as checks on activities of the operators in the sector. “I will implore government to ensure that tenancy law in Lagos is fully implemented and that can only be possible with collaboration of all stakeholders in the sector,” he said.

  • Senate seeks peaceful resolution of labour, banks’ feud

    Senate seeks peaceful resolution of labour, banks’ feud

    •Ngige: unionism is every worker’s right

    The National Assembly has called for peaceful resolution of the disagreement between labour and banks over retrenchment.

    It also praised the Minister of Labour and Employment, Sen. Chris Ngige, for his intervention in the matter.

    The NASS agreed with  the minister on dialoguing with all social partners to resolve the disagreement peacefully.

    At a public hearing on the emerging issues in the financial sector, Chairman, Senate Committee on Banking and Finance, Senator Rafiu Ibrahim, said: “We sincerely commend the Federal Government for being willing to work with the banks to find a common solution to this issue of retrenchment, which affects almost every family in Nigeria.

    “I am grateful that all of us have  agreed to dialogue and I implore you to do justice to all issues before the stakeholders’ summit coming up. I, therefore, appeal to everybody to be humble and be open in our different positions at the talks.”

    Ibrahim said the NASS was happy with the explanation by Ngige that he did not threaten that the Federal Government would withdraw licences from banks that continue to retrench workers; that it was a case of misrepresentation.

    According to Ibrahim, Ngige’s explanation made room for a convivial atmosphere for social partners to dialogue and peacefully resolve all issues.

    Ngige said steps taken by him on the issue were in defence of the Constitution, the labour laws and to safeguard the interests of parties, ensure peaceful industrial milieu for enhanced productivity in the sector.

    “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The Constitution is aware that we are in a society where all of us will not be equal and that everybody must be protected – big and small. That is why in Sections 14, 15 and 16 and even 17, the Constitution protects the employer, the economy and the workers,” he said.

    Ngige said it was from these provisions that the NASS enacted the labour laws on how to deal with issues of employment. ”So, all that my ministry has done is to execute and protect these laws from infractions. I acted in good faith to protect the interest of all,” he said.

    He cited petitions from unions in the financial sector, which border on unwholesome practices, the height of which was mindless retrenchment as the reason for his intervention.

    He directed the parties – the bank employers and the unions – to maintain the status quo ante-bellum through a press release on June 5, 2016, pending the resolution of the disputes.

    “We intervened in the spirit of collective bargaining. We got petitions from National Union of Banks, Insurance and Financial Institutions employees (NUBIFE) on casualisation, contract staffing, poor remunerations, which are not in conformity with equal work, equal pay in our constitution, as well as ill-human conditions of service,” he explained.

    Ngige added that the ministry also received petitions on sacks without due compensation and resistant to unionisation contrary to Section 40 of the Constitution, which the ministry investigated and found them true in some banks.

    “We invited the concerned banks; they gave excuses on why they won’t honour the invitation while they continued with retrenchments. I know my rights as Minister of Labour and I will exercise those rights for the benefits of Nigerians, high and low. It is within my power to declare a truce in any industrial crisis. That was why I asked the banks don’t retrench further and the unions; don’t picket the banks so we can sit down to resolve the issues,” he said.

    According to Ngige, the labour law on redundancy says in Article 20 that if an employer negotiates redundancy and a party is dissatisfied, the Minister has the right to intervene.

    He said the law provides for the employer to disengage a worker if he cannot actually run his enterprise efficiently and effectively with a large number of staff, in which case, he will declare redundancy. It states clearly the process for doing this.

    “It says you must engage the labour unions in that industry and if it gets out of hand, the local unions will report to their national union. If they can’t resolve this, the parties, unions or the banks will refer it to the Minister of Labour for conciliation,” he said.

    The Minister corrected the impression that the Federal Government was interfering in the running of private businesses.

    Speaking on unionisation in the banks, the Minister added that the only institution in the financial sector where staff members are exempted from unionisation is the Central Bank and that no other bank in the country had the right to prevent its staff from forming a union.

    “Unionisation, according to the constitution and labour laws, is the right of workers. There are exemptions and the institutions that are exempted are clearly listed. Here, it is only Central Bank that is exempted in the banking sector.

    “And the law says again that the Minister of Labour in his wisdom can grant a waiver to any institution. I have not granted waver to any bank and I will not grant such,” Ngige added.

  • Ondo monarchs to ratify resolution

    The Ondo State Council of Obas will, on Thursday, ratify the first class monarchs’ resolution scrapping the title of Eze Ndigbo, the Deji of Akure, Oba Ogunlade Aladetoyinbo, has said.

    Oba Aladetoyinbo spoke in his palace when the leadership of the Afenifere Renewal Group (ARG) under Chief Wale Oshun visited him.

    The group was represented by the Ondo State State Chairman of ARG, Dr Bayo Ademodi and other executives.

    The Akure monarch noted that the Igbo in Akure and their leaders  discovered they made a mistake when they realised the Yoruba were not happy at the insult given to the Deji by the dethroned Eze Ndigbo.

    Oba Aladetoyinbo said Sir Gregory Ilehohika and his followers apologised. He praised the government for its supportive role which, according to him, played a major role in reducing the tension the squabble generated.

    The ARG leader condemned the abduction of the former Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Chief Olu Falae, by suspected Fulani herdsmen.

    Ademodi encouraged the monarch to abolish the title of Eze Ndigbo, which he conferred on Ilehohika.