Tag: resolve

  • ‘APGA should resolve its internal squabbles’

    A public analyst, Okwudili Aniegboka, has cautioned the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA) to be mindful of the squabbles within the party to avoid destroying its foundation.

    Aniegboka said the crisis started with the decision on who could run for the National Assembly elections in Anambra State.

    He said: “For a party which conducted its last governorship primaries with near-perfect organisational efficiency, and set an electoral record in Nigeria with a landslide victory at the polls, it is saddening to see that APGA is showing all the signs of Nigeria’s usual inability to manage success so soon.”

    According to him, many observers are not comfortable with APGA’s seeming decline and its unexpected relegation of democratic virtues which had made it to stand out about one year ago.

    Aniegboka said: “Party insiders claim that the root cause of the trouble is the tussle for the senatorial ticket for Anambra South. This senatorial zone has suddenly become a theatre of war with gladiators up in arms against one another and drawing blood freely on social media.”

  • ‘FG must first resolve existing legal hurdles, de-annul the annulment’

    Dr. Soni Ajala, an Abuja based legal practitioner, spoke to Associate Editor, Sam Egburonu, on the legality of the awards and the declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day

    LET me start by saying that the politics of the issue of the posthumous award of Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) must not be muddled up with the core legal issue of the politics of the award.

    Much as all patriotic Nigerians applaud Mr. President, Muhammadu Buhari, for the bold step of recognising the supreme sacrifice of Chief MKO Abiola as the acclaimed winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election, there are landmine legal puzzle that cannot even be cured by administrative publication in the Federal Government Gazette by the Hon. Attorney General of the Federation as directed by President Buhari.

    I seriously share the sentiments expressed by Senator Ike Ekweremadu at the floor of the Senate on Thursday, June 7, 2018 when he attempted to sensitize the hallowed chambers on the complex legal issues intertwined in the gesture of Mr. President in bestowing posthumous award of GCFR on Chief MKO Abiola and the declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day.

    Lest we forget, the presidential election conducted by the National Electoral Commission under the able leadership of Professor Humphrey Nwosu on June 12, 1993 was annulled by a decree, duly promulgated by the National Defence and Security Council (NDSC) presided over by the Military President Ibrahim Babaginda on June 26, 1993. This historical legal instrument is very well to the knowledge of the presidency of today as it is open secret that the presidency of the day has one of the finest minds in the legal firmament of contemporary Nigeria.

    Therefore, the unsettling question to dispassionate legal analysts  of the web of legal issues thrown up by the gesture of President Buhari in bestowing posthumous award of GCFR on Chief MKO Abiola and the declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day is thus; ‘Can something be placed on nothing and it’ll be expected to stand?

    By lexical and legal connotations, the word ‘annulment means void, completely erased and never existed. By necessary implication of the subsisting decree of the National Defence and Security Council (NDSC) promulgated in 1993, de jure, there is no valid basis for the actions/gestures of Mr. President as what is/was annulled remains annulled until de-annulled.

    Lest we forget, there was also an order of the FCT High Court, Abuja made on June 15, 1993, restraining the National Electoral Commission from announcing further the result of the presidential election. There is/was no appeal against the said order of the FCT High Court. Therefore, the said order subsists as it is trite that an order of a court, no matter how irregularly it was procured, remains valid and in force until set aside either by the court that made the said order or by a superior court.

    With these weighty issues, the controversy of whether Mr. President can bestow the award of GCFR posthumously on Chief MKO Abiola, when he is/was not a serving or past president pales to insignificance. After all, the then President Shehu Shagari, in 1982, conferred on Chief Obafemi Awolowo the award of GCFR. Again, the fringe issue of whether the National Honours Act, 1963 permits Mr. President to confer GCFR posthumously on persons other than dead military/fire service officers, is of no moment as there is no provision in the Act that expressly ties the hands of Mr. President from extending the national honours of GCFR, GCON, etc., and/or medals posthumously to persons that did not serve in the military/para-military. To any student of presidential constitutionalism, it is unarguable that the powers of the president are enormous subject however to the law and the sacred provisions of the constitution.

    Consequently, it is suggested that the National Assembly, which is the replacement of the defunct National Defence and Security Council (NDSC) has work to do pursuant to Section 4 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria as amended to effectually give meaning to the gesture or more appropriately the noble intention of President Buhari as disclosed through the press statement issued on June 6, 2018 by passing a bill to de-annul the annulment of the result of the June 12, 1993 elections. This could either be by executive bill or individual bill of a senator of the hallowed chamber.

    On the other hand, the Hon. Attorney General should pick up the gauntlet to ‘disinfect the order of the FCT High Court, Abuja made on June 15, 1993, restraining the National Electoral Commission from announcing further the result of the presidential election held on June 12, 1993 that was generally believed to have been won by the visionary nationalist, Bashorun MKO Abiola.

    Instructively, President Buhari, under the 1999 Constitution as amended has no power whatsoever to waive a valid subsisting court order of a competent jurisdiction, nor does the power of Mr. President to grant clemency by any stretch of imagination extend to pick and choose which of the laws of the land to obey, including the June 12 election annulment decree, which until de-annulled by an Act of the extant parliament still has the force of law.

    Except the needful are done as explained here, all the noble intentions and altruistic gestures of Mr. President are prone to being decimated upon vehement legal challenge in court on the validity of the pronouncements of President Buhari on the June 12, 1993 election and Chief MKO Abiola as the law frowns at ‘placing something on nothing and expecting it to stand.’

    Furthermore and indeed very significant, even upon clearing the hurdles of the subsisting court order and de-annulment of the annulled June 12, 1993 elections, Chief Abiola cannot be recognised as former president of Nigeria as he never satisfied the mandatory provision of the 1999 Constitution that an occupant of the office of the president must subscribe and swore to an oath of allegiance. For now, that’s a legal impossibility.”

  • ‘Oyegun should resolve Delta APC crisis’

    Some Delta State All Progressives Congress (APC) leaders have called on the party’s national leadership to resolve the crisis rocking the state chapter, if they want the party to win the 2019 governorship election.

    The leaders Chief Dafe Ogheneovo, Johnson Afejuku and Diokpa Joel Ugbaja gave the advice at a briefing in Warri.

    Specifically, they urged President Muhammadu Buhari to step into the matter or risk a repeat of the party’s 2015 poor performance in the state.

    They alleged that Chief Otega Emerhor was palnning to zone the governorship slot to Delta North, in violation of the party chairman’s, Prophet Jones Erhue’’s, statement to the contrary.

    The leaders recalled that the party’s state working committee, the highest decision making body, had through the party chairman, issued a statement declaring that the governorship position was open to  members in irrespective of tribe and senatorial district.

    They alleged that the call by Emerhor that the governorship ticket be zoned to Delta North was as a result of an alleged deal between him and Governor Ifeanyi Okowa, that after the latter’s second tenure in 2023, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) would support Emerhor to win the primaries and the governorship of the party of his choice.They claimed that part of the plot was to lure Chief Great Ogboru to the APC, which he had executed, to deny Ogboru the opportunity of building his structures within his former party for the 2019 race. The call for Delta North to do one term through zoning is to exclude the zone from the race in 2023, they argued.

    They said the reasons some political leaders in APC and PDP were fighting Ogboru was because of his political value to the state, urging the party leadership to ensure justice was upheld in the party.

  • ICRC to resolve FAAN, MMA2 concession disputes

    The Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC), said it will deploy everything within its ability to ensure the concession dispute between the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN) and Bi-Courtney Aviation Services is  resolved.

    The Commission, which is saddled with the responsibility of monitoring and ensuring the efficient execution of all Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects entered  into by the Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) on behalf of the Federal Government, said it has continued to engage the Minister of State on Aviation,Hadi Sirika, on these challenges and believe they will be resolved soon enough in order to strengthen the relationship between the parties.

    The MMA2 and the Hotel and Conference Centre concessions awarded to Bi-Courtney Aviation Services Limited, as a PPP project for the design, engineering, procurement, construction, completion, commissioning, operations and transfer, has been  experiencing  several challenges.

    The terminal which took off in 2007, was concessioned by FAAN, as representative of the Federal Government on Build, Operate and Transfer (BOT) basis, but while BASL insists that the concession agreement was for 36 years and that the General Aviation Terminal (GAT) belongs to the company in cognizance of the agreement, FAAN insists that it did not endorse 36 years for the concession, but 12 years and that GAT was not part of the agreement.

    Speaking during a visit by the ICRC to MMA2, yesterday, Acting Director-General, ICRC, Chidi Izuwah, said he was aware of the challenges between  both parties,

    He said:  “We want to listen to both parties as an independent regulator, we want to physically assess the situation and challenges on ground, in order to bette appreciate the positions by FAAN and Bi-Courtney and thereafter suggest possible line of action in resolving these issues.

    “We are interested in having an update from the parties on the performance of the related projects; we want to understand the challenges facing the operators, as well as the grantor of the contracts and the various steps taken towards resolving these challenges; we want to hear from the parties their requests to the government in ensuring the projects are efficiently implemented for the overall benefits to the government.”

    Also speaking during the visit, Wale Babalakin, Chairman, Bi-Courtney Aviation Services said if Nigeria intends to encourage private sector participation in the infrastructural development of the country it must abide by international regulations; government and its agencies must respect and abide by concession agreements.

    Babalakin denied the allegation that it was Bi-Courtney that drafted the concession agreement and also noted that the company was not the winner of the concession, but Royal Standerton, which was the preferred bidder; however, Bi-Courtney inherited the concession when the later could not meet the pace of work expected by the federal government.

    Also speaking on behalf of FAAN, Monica Alphonse, the Deputy General Manager, Public Private Partnership, said that GAT has never been part of the concession agreement and that the monopoly status that stated that no other airport terminal should be developed during the course of the concession period by BASL may have taken cognizance of the fact that the concession was for 12 years.

    Alphonse described such clauses that gave BASL such advantage as antitrust and pro-monopoly, adding that the agreement should have been renegotiated if the concession was designed for 36 years and noted, that “such agreement is repugnant to natural justice.”

    She said that FAAN was willing to ensure that the problem between it and BASL over the concession was resolved. BASL officials also spoke in the same vein.

  • ‘How to resolve ethical issues in assisted fertility’

    Experts in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) have met at the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA), Victoria Island, Lagos to discuss ethics in IVF – in vitro fertilisation. OYEYEMI GBENGA-MUSTAPHA, who was there, reports .

    The Nigerian Institute of International Affairs’ (NIIA) hall in Victoria Island was  filled when who-is- who in fertility and reproductive health in the country gathered to chart the way forward on germane issues in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART).

    Pro-lifers, religious leaders, pluralists and shapers of thoughts were at the event.

    It was a public forum on Ethics in IVF-in-vitro fertilisation organised by the Ethics Committee of the Association for Fertility and Reproductive Health (AFRH).

    The objective was to gauge stakeholders and public groups opinion on ethics in ART practice with focus on IVF.

    Some of the questions discussed were: Is IVF – in-vitro fertilisation ethical? Is intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection ethical? Is gamete donation ethical? is the use of donour gametes without the spouse/partner’s consent ethical? Is surrogacy ethical?; Is treatment of couples infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) ethical? Is pre-implantation genetic Diagnosis (PGD), use in treatment of the purposes of sex selection or other ethical?; is treatment of single women and unmarried couples ethical? and is the use of gametes and embryos in research ethical? among others.

    The experts resolved that many of the ethical issues in fertility treatment concern one’s views on when life begins. The Catholic Church, for example, believes that life begins at the moment of conception, and only permits the fertilisation of eggs that will be used, insisting on the implantation of all viable embryos.

    AFRH President, Dr Faye Iketubosin, said: “As an association, we are here to advise, we are trying to set a code of ethics for practitioners which includes people having the right qualifications, facilities and knowledge to engage in ART practices. The ethical issues raised at the discussion generated a lot of controversy from religious group, sociologists and the general public at large. The discussion is borne out of the need to speak to the public and get their opinion on certain practices of ART that might be controversial particularly when they are in conflict with our culture and religious beliefs.”

    Iketubosin said: “We are sensitive to ensuring that we carry out our practice in an ethical way. The resolution reached at the forum will be deliberated upon and  an acceptable ethical standard for the practice of ART in Nigeria would be formulated.”

    He said there are numerous factors responsible for the increase in infertility. He said the average sperm count in men has dropped from 20 million to 15 million and that is because of a global trend. The reason, according to him, was because of the disruptions of food chain.

    “We now eat a lot of processed foods, foods that are chemically processed that are now affecting us in negative ways including infertility,” he asid.

    On why more women are becoming infertile, Iketubosin said more and more women have embarked on successful careers, they have delayed having children and a woman has a final lifespan within which she can achieve a pregnancy naturally, “by the time they begin that quest for child, they are actually already too old and that is why the issue of egg donation is borne out of the fact that we have seen a lot of older women, over the age of 38 who are now trying to have a child for the first time,” explained.

    On the way out, Iketubosin said is for Nigeria to go back to organic farming/products which  are less expensive than the processed food, “importation of contaminated or processed products can be achieved with government policies which will monitor what comes into the country,” said Dr Iketubosin.

    A Consultant/Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and CEO of OMNI Medical Centre, Lagos, Prof Osato Giwa-Osagie, said the role of psychological factors in IVF is complex.

    “Psychological issues intertwine with physical ones, often with additive effects. There is no clear evidence that IVF babies are more at risk from abnormalities, or that women undertaking IVF are at higher risk of certain cancers.

    “IVF is simply fertilising an egg outside  the womb, then re-implanting the embryo. It is not a ‘treatment’ of infertility since it doesn’t treat the underlying problem. The cause of the problem should be investigated thoroughly before IVF is considered.”

    He recalled his many experience with couples, and many litigations, which “outcomes would have naturally set the laws and proper ethics of the practice of ART, especially IVF, surrogacy and other ethical issues in the country but for the demise of the litigants. But it is never too late to get it right,” said Prof Giwa-Osagie.

    He clarified a grey area, “There is no clear evidence that babies from IVF are more at risk from abnormalities than those born through natural conception. Indeed, it seems that certain types of abnormality, such as chromosome problems, are less common with IVF. However, IVF babies tend to have more problems at birth, and stillbirths may be slightly more common. This may not be due to IVF,  it is probably because women who conceive through IVF are more likely to be at high-risk in pregnancy,” he stated.

    Speaking for Muslim faithful, Dr Ahmed Sa’eid of the Department of Surgery, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (LASUTH), said about 90 percent of Nigerians are either Christians or Muslims, so one cannot make a law that would disregard their beliefs.

    “We are hopeful that when policies or laws on IVF and ART are developed, it will also take care of the concerns that our culture is very important to the people who are citizens of this country.

    “The fact that ART/IVF is happening in many other parts of the world does not mean that everything that is happening in there, must be imported wholesale into Nigeria. We need to domesticate it to our people. These are the concerns of religious bodies,” said Dr Sa’eid.

    He added that child-bearing brings joy. “I want to feel the joy of childbearing doesn’t mean that I must have to get that at all cost. I don’t have to become a pagan simply because I am looking for a child, because if I truly believe in the God that I worship, part of the faith will also teach me patience, perseverance and to have trust in that God,” he said.

    Other religious leaders agreed that they would dedicate babies achieved through ART/IVF because, “all good gifts come from God. And nobody should be denied of being a parent, more so that the art and science are available’’.

    ‘’IVF treatment can be very stressful. However, often, infertile couples feel that by undergoing IVF they are doing something positive to resolve their problem. For so many it is undoubtedly better to have gone through IVF and failed, than not to have attempted it all,” they added.

  • Supreme Court should resolve executive/Senate face-off

    SIR: It is apposite to view the Senate’s insistence that the acting President recant his legal opinion on heads of agency appointments as patently puerile.

    The eighth Senate has been in a combat mode since it was prorogued with most of its agenda driven by reactionary leadership.

    Asking the executive arm to head to Supreme Court is not only reflective of lack of any sense of urgency in the red chamber’s attitude to legislative business, it also cast a big slur on the patriotic credentials of members as it were.

    One would rather expect the senate to confirm all appointments tabled before it and isolate that of Ibrahim Magu pending the Supreme Court’s interpretation of section 171 of the constitution.

    To freeze every confirmation and thus deny critical agencies like INEC and others the much needed administrative stability is to allow some unruly elements in the Senate who are caught in the web of legal battles to destabilize the fledging democratic process.

    Since the executive has transmitted the instrument for confirmation to the legislature and the latter declined on issues of constitutional ambiguity, then the onus is on the Senate to seek the Supreme Court’s interpretation and not to put governance in limbo.

    One must also add that the matter when eventually brought to the Supreme Court should be given accelerated attention as is being done in civilized climes.

    The recent Trump’s travel ban was expeditiously dispensed with by the U.S. Supreme Court because if allowed to hang, it could hurt other sundry national interests.

    It’s rather disconcerting that the anti-corruption bill before the eighth Senate remains pigeon-holed for lack of political will to do the right thing.

    It is even shameful that the leadership of the Senate could be so insular as to dismiss the anti-corruption war as ineffectual when it’s actually the one putting spanner in the wheel.

     

    • Bukola Ajisola,

    bukymany@yahoo.com

  • How to resolve Niger Delta crisis, by Dickson

    How to resolve Niger Delta crisis, by Dickson

    Bayelsa State Governor Henry Seriake Dickson has an answer to the Niger Delta crisis – if the Federal Government should engage in more confidence building.

    In his view, Nigeria would not have been in recession but for the crisis.

    Dickson, who spoke with reporters in Abuja warned the ruling All Progressives Congress ( APC) against muzzling the opposition Peoples Democratic Party( PDP).

    Among others, the governor spoke on his plans to provide water for more than 200 communities, said it was possible to resolve the crisis with “better tact.”

    He said: “If you are talking of raising several trillions of naira to fund the federal budget, and the state budget which are also predicated on oil revenue, then we must be concerned about what happens from the source of that money. So it is an issue that everybody must be concerned. We in the Niger Delta, my colleagues and I; we are all trying our best.

    “But you see all of these takes some level of partnership and collaboration; so while we governors try our best and while leaders like Edwin Clark and others are trying their best and security agents are doing their best, community leaders are doing their best, we also expect the political leadership at the centre to also appreciate these challenges and then follow up and encourage and build understanding and promote dialogue and peace building.

    “Unfortunately, like Chief Edwin Clark said, not much is happening from the federal side, I am not saying that they are not concerned. They are because they also know the implications. Part of the reasons our country went into recession is because of the crisis in the Niger Delta. And so they are all concerned and I am aware that the Vice President would be visiting the region very soon and we are supporting that endeavour for people to go and see the real situation of the Niger Delta.

    “All in all, we will like to see more commitment and more proactive engagement by the Federal Government and their agencies.

    The issues in the Niger Delta revolve around security and stability and development and the need to expand economic opportunities. These are the challenges that I see. And, for me, we will continue to keep Bayelsa safe and protect strategic assets to enable production take place and I know that colleagues are also doing the same. All we ask is that the federal agencies should be more sensitive, should show greater commitment and be more proactive and engage.”

    Dickson spoke of past effort to ensure peace. He said: “I cannot recount how many times ex- President Obasanjo and his national security team led by Gen. Aliyu Gusau and others. They convened conferences and meetings at different levels. You remember immediately after his election, the first place Obasanjo went to was Warri, Port Harcourt and at every major development, the President would be calling the governors to direct, also the National Security Advisers would be calling. Even though there were challenges, there was a concerted  meeting of minds by the leadership.

    “But I think in the end we are going to work to address most of it because these are long standing challenges and issues;  they are not issues that started with this government; the issues of lack of development, the issues of environment, the issues of economic exclusion, these are long-standing things.

    “But the important thing is confidence-building and keeping hope alive and making concrete efforts and I think more of that should go on.”

    Dickson believes that President Muhammadu Buhari should be respected because difference in parties should not affect governance.

    He said: “I  believe essentially that difference in party should not affect governance and there should be respect for leadership and leadership begets leadership. Nigerian leaders should respect themselves, I mean those in government and those out of government, because in the end, everybody has made contribution to national development which should be acknowledged, which should be respected. And I feel whoever is the President of this country should be respected.

    “Although let me add that the APC didn’t accord the former President that respect when he was in office. APC played politics when they were in opposition with anything and everything. They played politics with Boko Haram, played politics with the economy, and played politics with fuel subsidy. And now they came and reversed fuel subsidy. So, they played politics with anything and everything.

    “I don’t think that to be in opposition I have to be abusing the President or  I have to be attacking his wife.

    “I think that certain things should be off limit but that does not mean that we should not disagree. And that is why I said we should carry on our politics in this country with respect for one another knowing that whether we agree or disagree we are Nigerians and we have our country to work for.”

  • How to resolve PDP crisis, by Filani

    How to resolve PDP crisis, by Filani

    Former National Vice Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) (Southwest) Chief Ishola Filani recently celebrated his 70th birthday in Lagos. He spoke with Group Political Editor Emmanual OLadesu and Musa Odoshimokhe about his political journey, the PDP crisis, why the party lost last year’s presidential election and other partisan issues.

    How do you feel at 70?

    I feel very happy and great at 70. I praise God that He is gracious enough to let me be 70 years of age. There is no way to describe it because a lot has happened; my primary school to secondary school, university and call to bar days. I also thank Him for my practice of the law, political activities. I thank God that He has been generous to me and I have not had cause to stop glorifying Him. I am really fulfilled because it is an attitude of the mind; some people feel fulfilled, some don’t feel fulfilled. but, I have cause to thank God because I think I am fulfilled. Everything that I want to be, I am contended with it. I think I have made my impact and I thank God I am in good health. He has given me good children and I thank Him for everything I have been able to do within this 70 years. I am not going judge myself. it is left for the people to judge me.

    Why did you study law?

    It was a thing that just happened to me when I was in the primary school. I remember when I was in primary six, our teacher asked from us what we wanted to become in life. I said I wanted to become a lawyer and he continued to remind me. He monitored my life and after secondary school, he reminded me of my ambition. My inspiration did not come from the example of anybody. Although we have many educated persons in my family, I happened to be the first lawyer. It was not as if it was my family that gave me the inspiration. It was my own decision.

    What circumstances made you to join politics?

    If there is anything that I regret, it is joining politics when I did. As a good lawyer, I should have waited for another two or three years or maximum of five years, to be called into the inner bar before venturing to politics. That one aspect of my life is what I regret that I have not achieved. I still hope that now at this age, I should be able to devote more time to law practice, to be able to achieve that goal, to become what you people call Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN). We call it the inner bar.

    Why did you join the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and not the National Republican Convention (NRC)?

    I have a very big brother then, very intelligent, a professor of Chemistry from the University of Lagos. The late Professor Ade Adegbite, was my big brother and we were very close. He and Babagana Kingibe went to the same university in England. And when Kingibe came back to Nigeria, it was through him that I met Kingibe. Kingibe and I became friends and Adegbite was our big brother. When General Shehu Yar’Adua was now looking for intellectuals for the Peoples Front of Nigeria (PFN), Kingibe was one of the people he invited first and, in turn, Kingibe introduced us to him. That was how we started. We were like consultants, but because I was free, I was now seeing him more frequently than Prof. Adegbite. That was how I went into politics and we drafted all the papers. And of course, the late President Umaru Yar’Adua was part of us. The PFN could not be registered. Some of us had to move to form the Social Democratic Party (SDP). The position zoned to us in my state was the position of ex-official. I contested it and won. That was how it started.

    The leadership of the SDP abandoned M.K.O Abiola…   

    The party did not subvert Abiola’s mandate. all that I know as an active participant during Hope ’93, which was what we called the Abiola Campaign Organisation. Dr. Jonathan Zwingina was the chairman of the campaign committee, I was the director of publicity of the campaign committee. Some of the people that we were in the publicity team were Dele Alake, Tunji Bello and Dr. Doyin Abiola, who was always at home receiving materials from us for publication. With this background, I had insight into what happened. We won the election and it was annulled and lot of protest ensued. At the end of the day, people had accused even Kingibe of betraying Chief Abiola. I want to say with all sense of responsibility that it was not so. What happened was that after the election was annulled, there was this move by General Sani Abacha. Members of the defunct parties were to nominate people to serve in his government. The feeling of people then and strongly too, was that he was not going to be there more than a year. Abiola called us and briefed us about it. He told us that this was what he got from Abacha. The consensus of opinion then was that we should join. The reason given was that, if we do not join, the NRC will join. And if NRC joined, it would be a disadvantage to us. If in a year’s time, Abacha now decided to supervise the conduct of election, it would be like we were not cooperating with him and we would not be favoured. That was a good reason and Abiola submitted the names with the consent Kingibe. Being a democrat, he called all the leaders; it was as if taking permission from them. So, you can’t blame anybody for the circumstance of the time. The insinuation that Kingibe betrayed Abiola by going to join Abacha is not true and if there was anybody that gave Abiola the needed support during his trying period, it was Kingibe, particularly when he became the Minister of Internal Affairs. When he was in charge of prison, he was able to do a lot to assist him. That was what happened. Until Abiola died, I know that the relationship between Abiola and Kingibe was very cordial.

    Why did you leave Alliance for the Democracy (AD) for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)?

    When Bola Ige died, the cohesion in the AD was no longer there. Some people took over the party, running it as if it was a personal affair. The kind of leadership Ige offered was no longer there. The party was now taking the form of a sectional party; it was almost taking the dimension of a Yoruba party, whereas one had a broader view of the party, in terms of ideology. The ideology was no longer strongly pursued like when Ige was there. In term of administration, it was no longer democratic.

    Why did you not contest for elective office throughout your political career?

    I was more devoted to party administration; the only time I decided to contest for elective office was in 2007.  The contest for the Ekiti State governorship election was in top gear. I and other people were disqualified during the screening to contest the primary. I appealed and at the appeal committee, it was there we learnt that it was because I did not submit my primary school leaving certificate. It was also discovered that certain influences that worked against some of us. Even where the argument was accepted, that I was qualified in view of all certificates presented, but when we went to the headquarters to collect clearance letter, the primary had ended. That was the first and last I contest for elective position. Apart from that, I was more interested in party administration, which got me into an ex-officio member of the SDP. There, I became the National Publicity Secretary and member Board of Trustees (BoT) of the party. In the AD, I did not hold any position, but I was a very good point of contact. In the PDP, I was elected into the national executive Committee and later, I became the National Vice Chairman. I served in so many committees to regulate the party. There was a time I was the Sole Administrator of the SDP in Delta, Edo, Imo and Abia states. During campaigns, I was chairman of one committee or the other. I have been seriously involved in party administration. I think I even prefer that because I am challenged by the responsibilities.

    Why was the PDP defeated during the Presidential election?

    The PDP lost the election because we did not field a northerner. It can be explained that as at then, the PDP had been in power for 16 years. Out of the 16 years, the South held power for 14 years; Chief Olusegun Obasanjo eight years, Goodluck Jonathan who took over from Umaru Yar’ Adua spent six years. And by the unwritten convention of the party, it was that south and north would have eight years each. And if during the period, the north had only two out for the 16 years and we still gave it to the south, if Jonathan had won, it means South would have spent 18 years as against the two years held by the north. Many of us who could think deeply advised against Jonathan coming up and that was the result.

    What is your position on the PDP crisis?

    When people talk of PDP crisis, I laugh because the crisis in our party is better than the one in the All Progressives Congress (APC). One thing that is happening is this, if it is not true that Ali Modu Sheriff is being sponsored by external forces, then, he should see reason to cooperate with the man stream of the party. If all the governors, the National Assembly caucus, state chairmen, other executives, past ministers, the board of trustees and everybody is on one side, all we are doing in the PDP, is like the biblical Jesus Christ who said if you have 100 sheep and one is lost, you abandon the 99 and go about searching for the lost one.  The PDP asking Sheriff not to do this or that is just a fulfillment of that biblical injunction. That is to say nobody is useless; the more the merrier. It has become a parlance that when people in the party lost primary, they will say they are contesting under Sherriff faction. Our prayer is that Sherriff should see reason so that we can carry on with the party affairs.

    Why was the Southwest PDP unable to agree on a candidate for the national chairman?

    There was an agreement, but people breached the agreement. I was at the meeting held by the Southwest caucus in Akure, where we zoned the positions that were zoned to the Southwest. The position of National Chairman, National Treasurer and Deputy National Publicity Secretary, were those that were zoned to the Southwest. Again, we have our own internal zoning arrangement in the Southwest, we gave National Chairman to Lagos and Ogun, We gave the Deputy Publicity Secretary to Oyo and Osun and we gave the National Treasurer to Ekiti and Ondo. We now said that, going by what is happening in Nigeria, we needed an experience politician. We need somebody who can go all the way through whatever difficulties, we are passing through, we need experience person to lead the party. We believed that because of the experience of that Chief Olabode George has in party administration; he was the National Vice Chairman and Deputy National Vice Chairman. He was the coordinator of Yar’Adua Campaign Organisation. We believe that such a person has the experience to lead the party, so that what is zoned to us, we will put the best of men to occupy the position. We nominated him. but, some people insisted that they would contest against him. Even, some people from the Southsouth, despite that they were not favoured to do so, contested. It was a pity that the convention did hold; maybe we would have been able to see what the result would be. So, we presented a consensus candidate in zones for the Southwest, but, two people came from Lagos.

  • ‘Senate inches to resolve differences’

    ‘Senate inches to resolve differences’

    The lingering conflict of interests which polarised the Senate since its inauguration on June 9, last year, will soon be over, it was learnt yesterday.

    Findings showed that senators may have resolved to sheath their swords and work together in the interest of the country as well as to shore up their dwindling legislative output.

    A ranking lawmakers, Senator Abu Ibrahim, confirmed the development to reporters in Abuja, yesterday.

    Ibrahim, who represents the Katsina South Senatorial District, was one of the lawmakers, senators opposed to the emergence of bubakar Bukola Saraki, as Senate President.

    Saraki’s emergence as the Senate President against the interest of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) sowed a seed of discord in the upper chamber.

    The conflict of interests engendered two opposing groups, the Senate Unity Forum, a group of senators, who opposed the candidature of Saraki and Like Minds , another group of senators, who backed Saraki to clich the senate presidency.

  • Omirin restates resolve to quash ‘impeachment’

    Omirin restates resolve to quash ‘impeachment’

    Former Ekiti State House of Assembly Speaker Adewale Omirin has restated his resolve to challenge his “impeachment” by seven members of the Fourth Assembly in court.

    Members of the Fifth Assembly turned down his request to reverse his “impeachment’’, restore his rights and privileges and obliterate the records of former factional Speaker Dele Olugbemi.

    Omirin said it was wrong for the lawmakers to make public the contents of the letter he wrote to them.

    He accused the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)-dominated Assembly of blackmailing him by addressing a briefing on the letter.

    The ex-Speaker, who spoke yesterday at the state secretariat of the All Progressives Congress (APC), said Governor Ayo Fayose, the Speaker, Kola Oluwawole and the Assembly Clerk, Tola Esan, knew about his letter.

    He added that he also notified party leaders like Solid Minerals Minister Dr. Kayode Fayemi, state APC Chairman Olajide Awe and Senator Anthony Adeniyi.

    Omirin condemned the Oluwawole-led Assembly for playing politics with his request, describing the action of the lawmakers as “petty.”

    He said he was advised to go to court, and he instructed his lawyer to contact the Clerk for the Hansard of November 20, last year, when the impeachment was carried out.

    Omirin said: “The rejection of my letter was petty. It confirmed that the lawmakers don’t have minds of their own. I had decided not to join issues with the Assembly, because I couldn’t afford to cast aspersion on the same House I once presided over and led members to pass 72 bills into law.

    “Making my letter public was a clear case of blackmail. The governor, Speaker and the Clerk were aware of my letter. It was the Clerk who called me and said my impeachment could be reversed and that I should write a letter, rather than going to court.

    “I know that my letter could not have been made public by Oluwawole without consulting Governor Fayose. So, it was an attempt to frame me.

    “The Speaker is not in charge of that Assembly, the governor is and whatever the Speaker does, he has to follow the dictates of the governor.”

    Responding, Committee Chairman on Information Gboyega Aribisogan said the lawmakers did nothing wrong in deliberating upon Omirin’s letter, saying their action could not be mistaken for blackmail.

    He added: “We have deliberated in this House that whatever happens in the Assembly should be made known to the electorate. So, the issue of blackmail being raised was a figment of his imagination.”