Tag: resources

  • Resources can’t meet needs, says Dickson

    •’Our debts were inherited’

    Bayelsa State Governor Seriake Dickson has said the resources of the state are inadequate.

    He was responding to the rating of Bayelsa ahead of six other states that failed the domestic sustainability analysis conducted by the Debt Management Office (DMO).

    Bayelsa polled 1.712 per cent with a domestic debt profile of N162.82 billion.

    In a statement by his Chief Press Secretary, Daniel Iworiso-Marskon, the governor said the debts were inherited from previous administrations and not contracted by the one-year-old administration.

    The statement reads: “The substantive figures in the document were right; it was an inherited burden which the state government had made much effort to reduce.

    “The repayment of the debt had been on-going having established the total debts inherited from the previous administrations.

    “There are concerted efforts to liquidate the remaining part of the debt.

    “We noted the relative figures in the report, which suggested concern but the reality is that the debts were solely inherited and we have made efforts to reduce it.

    “The Dickson administration has not borrowed a kobo since assumption of office.

    “We have rather been saving money to finance development programmes and we can see the results so far.

    “Also, we have to put into context the challenges of running an efficient and effective administration and, of course, the numerous challenges of development we met in the state.

    “This necessitated that while we continue to reduce the debt profile we inherited, we must also be mindful of the government’s responsibility to the people.

    “So, in the face of these challenges, the perceived huge Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) is still not sufficient to finance the restoration agenda of the administration.

    “Yet, we are proud to state that while we have some outstanding debt, we have made substantial investments and progress in every facet of the state’s economy; from massive infrastructure to education to tourism and human capital development and job creation which cost so much relative to the IGR in Bayelsa State.

    “Overall, we are marching ahead with determination to make a remarkable difference in the development of the economy that has really impacted meaningfully on the people.

    “Our books are open to the public, which in any case we have consciously made known to the public monthly.

    “We will still continue to deliver on accountability, transparency and the essentials of our manifesto and indeed paying attention to the remaining debt, until it is finally liquidated.”

     

  • Activist calls for financial update on Ondo resources

    Akure lawyer, Mr. Morakinyo Ogele, yesterday called for detailed information Ondo State’s finances since the inception of the Olusegun Mimiko administration.

    The activist said he was acting on under Section 1 (1) [2] of the Freedom of Information Act 2011, which gives every Nigerian the right to have access vital information and documents that concern the people.

    In a letter to the Ministry of Finance, Ogele said since the ministry had a copy of the letter, it should explain the financial standing of the state within seven days.

    The letter said the government should give details of how it spent the N600million budgeted for the local government creation in the state.

    Others are: Kaadi Igbe Ayo, for which N2.7billion was spent; the N38billion left by the ousted Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) administration under Dr Olusegun Agagu; a N50billion loan from a local bank and bound market.

    Ogele is also demanding explanations on the following: “The N61.3billion budgeted for the Ondo State Oil Producing Areas Development Commission (OSOPADEC); N200million Arigidi-Akoko Tomato Industry, allegedly converted to a pure water factory; N7billion palm tree seeding, allegedly dumped at Ore and Bagbe; and N2.7billion, allegedly spent on the construction of a Dome in Akure, the state capital.

    The lawyer noted that the residents were suffering from the financial recklessness of the LP administration, led by Dr Olusegun Mimiko.

    He threatened to mobilise the people to demonstrate peacefully against the alleged misappropriation of the state fund, if the government refused to give details on how it utilised the state’s resources.

     

  • We must monetise our gas resources, says Gowon

    We must monetise our gas resources, says Gowon

    Nigeria started commercial oil export in 1957 but only produced its first LNG 42 years after, in 1999. I am aware that Nigeria LNG Limited has, in just 13 years of production, brought in over $51 billion in revenue, delivered $9 billion dividends to Nigeria and paid $10 billion to the Joint Venture companies. If you do a simple math, you will see that the Nigeria LNG project would have earned $130 billion over the 35 years of inactivity.

    It is therefore very disheartening if one stops for a moment and thinks about how different this country would have been if we had the benefit of an LNG plant since the 1960s. Think of how much money the nation would have made from gas export; how many roads, how many schools and how many jobs would have been created in Nigeria in the 35 years the LNG plant was sitting idly on the drawing board.

    Think of how much cash, sorry gas, we burnt between when we found oil in 1957 and when Nigeria LNG was able to start monetising our gas resources in 1999. Last year, this country flared over 460 billion standard cubic feet of gas that, if processed and exported, would have fetched the country over $2 billion and minimised the health and environmental impact of gas flares.

    History recorded that the windows of opportunity to build LNG plants disappeared in both the 1960s and 1970s – the two times we came so close to building an LNG plant in Nigeria, when due to delays in reaching decisions, other countries, especially in Europe (i.e. North Sea) got to the global market earlier than we did. But opportunities do not disappear; they go elsewhere, especially when we fail to utilise them.

    Think of how oil palm industry left Nigeria for Malaysia. Think of how athletics – we won Gold at the Sydney Olympics 12 years ago – left Nigeria to Jamaica. And the worst of all, countries we started out with in the LNG business have all left us behind.

    Nigeria LNG Limited used to be the fastest growing LNG plant in the world. But for the past five years, a country like Qatar has moved from 20 to 80 million tonnes range, whilst a country like Australia has made final investment decision to build LNG projects up to 80 million tonnes. I now understand that Mozambique and Tanzania will soon be joining the gas producers with the export of LNG.

    All the LNG projects on the drawing board in Nigeria (NLNG Train Seven, Brass LNG, OKLNG) will add about 30million tonnes of LNG to our national output, which is not that much when we compare with Australia which has only 60% of our reserves but effectively generates much higher domestic electricity and will soon be exporting much more LNG than the all the LNG companies in Nigeria combined.

    So I am still not completely fulfilled that we haven’t reached our destination in that journey we started so long ago. I am worried that history is about to repeat itself as other players (including the USA, a previous importer now a net exporter) will get to the global market ahead of us and it may be another 30-50 years lost. I will not like to see another great opportunity lost due to our lethargy.

    We can’t afford to sit on the fence any longer. The time to build Train Seven is now!

    Nigeria LNG Limited has become too much of a good example to be allowed to fail; too much of a national beacon to be allowed to stumble; too much of a winning model to switch midstream.

    Like the Nobel laureate, William Faulkner would say, I hope that this company’s success will not merely endure; it will prevail. We live in very perilous times, that even only to endure, nations and companies must prevail – over an accelerating technology that threatens to escape their control and over volatile markets that obscure hard work and make success seem like lottery.

    I have in private discussions with the management of Nigeria LNG Limited been assured that Train Seven will provide no fewer than 10,000 construction jobs; will attract over $8 billion in Direct Foreign Investment with its strong balance sheet; and will increase monetisation of gas resources, otherwise still being flared.

    With a proven gas reserve in the country of 187 trillion cubic metres estimated to last 109 years and unproven reserve of about 600 trillion cubic metres expected to last about 300 years, Nigeria has the 7th largest gas reserve and is not gas-challenged; it is only gas-infrastructure-challenged. We have more than enough gas to meet our entire domestic and export market commitments several times over!

    It’s seven years since activities leading up to Train Seven started in September 2005, five years since Sales and Purchase Agreements were executed with five international buyers, and five years since Pre-FID construction activities started in April 2007 with $300m spent so far on such activities as soil preparation, preloads, and geotechnical investigations on Bonny Island. We no longer can afford to delay or dither.

    As a former President and a statesman who constantly prays for this country, including for us not to repeat the mistakes of the past, I urge the government and the shareholders not to let this happen. Let’s build Train Seven now before the window of opportunity goes away to other countries.

    I gather that the Honourable Minister for Petroleum Resources, Dr. Deziani Allison-Madueke, and the former Group Managing Director of Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC), Mr. Austen Oniwon, publicly announced that Train Seven FID will be taken by 2013. This is good.

    It is important to provide the market and investors comfort at the highest levels that the FID will be taken from 2013, which will also ensure that all stakeholders follow up with the work necessary to ensure that this happens. It will also go a long way to assure the market that Nigeria is serious about meeting this time table, this time around, and when the history of NLNG is told, the resolve and prescience of the current government in making it grow, will be rewarded with high praise.