Tag: restructured

  • Value of restructured Nigeria

    Lamido of Adamawa owes no one an apology for appearing to demonstrate his loyalty first to members of his Fulani ethnic group located in Adamawa and Cameroon before Nigeria. After all, the whole essence of federal arrangement is to liberate individuals and groups from the tyranny of the state. For me, the real enemies are the self proclaiming crusaders for the elusive Nigeria common vision, a lucrative enterprise that carries rewards such as political appointment, import duty waivers, allocation of oil block and even getting nominated by the presidency to the confab without representing anyone.

    I also think he was right to have pre-empted some of his colleagues who could not wait for the actual debate to commence before expressing righteous indignation about the current revenue sharing formula by disclosing that the north has no objection to the oil producing states holding on to their oil 100 per cent provided the non-oil producing states also own their land including Abuja where most of the stolen fuel money is dumped, 100%. His sidekick to his ‘civilized’ colleagues from the South-west who have for 50 years strived to export their unsolicited superior values of representative democracy to mind their own business is a legitimate demand in a nation with federal arrangement.

    I think the Lamido’s deft handling of his presentation of Fulani/northern agenda has only reinforced the argument of those who have said the most important assignment of this confab is the restructuring of our country to reflect the aspirations of the various federating nationalities. Our structure, everyone agrees is the bane of our society. All our country woes – crisis of revenue allocation, corruption, infrastructural decay, collapse of educational sector as well as religious intolerance, stem from the unworkable federal arrangement selfishly imposed by the military and sustained by those benefiting from the anarchy especially the parasitic federal government whose major preoccupation is sharing what does not belong to it, cornering in the process over 50% of what others produced.

    With the First Republic structure of four regions, designed to ensure each group developed at its own pace without interference from others or the six geo-political zones structure canvassed by well meaning Nigerians, the recklessness currently associated with an insensitive federal government that behaves as if it owes no one any explanation for its irresponsible behaviour becomes impossible. For instance the late Olusegun Agagu, a former minister of energy claimed the nation generated 4200MW of electricity in 2002. Twelve years down the line and an expenditure of between $25 and $50 billion dollars, we today generate less than 4000MW; yet the government caries on as if it is not accountable to anyone and in fact has been busy going around the country campaigning for re-election.

    First, the Lamido was right. The Fulani tribes located all over West Africa are said to be defined by their locations, occupation and dialects. The Adamawa Fulani in Nigeria are therefore the same with about two million Fulani who live across the border in Cameroon and Chad. With a restructured Nigeria, we don’t need to argue about who the Lamido owes his allegiance. Under a federal arrangement, it is first to his people. But then he also carries his own responsibilities as well as the consequences of failure of leadership in the manner President Jonathan recently asked the governor of Borno State where only 27% of children of school age go to school thereby providing fertile ground for recruitment of insurgents, to face his own demons.

    A restructured North-east will enable Nigerians know who the Lamido whose allegiance to his two millions kinsmen in Cameroon and Chad has never been in doubt speak for. Does the north he speaks for include the current Hausa farmers , and other non Fulani ethnic groups who are currently victims of mindless killings by Fulani herdsmen and Boko Haram insurgents who drive in unchallenged from Chad and Cameroon ?

    I am sure with a restructured North-east, the Lamido would have had to find explanation for how Boko Haram breezed in from his brethrens in Chad to kill his subjects’ 58 children in their dormitories in Yobe or how armed men from Cameroon, his second home, laid a six-hour siege on Madagali Local Government Area of Adamawa State looting and burning Michika, Gulak, Shuwa communities. With a north eastern region, the Lamido and political opinion leaders of the area such as the Bamanga Tukurs, the Danjumas, the Ribadus, the respected Adamu Ciromas along with other influential leaders of the zone, would have also been asked to confront their own demons because it is they and they alone that know how to appease the angry members of their families from Cameroon and Chad or Sudan which hosts eight million Nigerians.

    Restructuring will also answer the question of who in fact own the 72% of land of Nigeria which Ahmed Bugaje and the Lamido claim belong to the north. What percentage of the land belongs to the Hausa and their Fulani conquerors that came to Nigeria about 200 years ago? What is the share of the minorities who have since independence, wanted liberation from their feudal overlords? Does this also include chunk of land in Kwara, and Kogi unilaterally ceded to the north by the colonial masters? Restructuring will expose those parasites that have continued to impoverish the real owners of the land in the name of the monolithic north whose ghost was laid to rest with the creation of a 12-state structure by General Yakubu Gowon in 1967.

    Restructuring will also solve the crisis of indigeneship and settlers by modern day Nigerian nomadic cattle farmers who move around with AK 47 and other sophisticated weapons confiscating their hosts’ farmland, declaring them no man’s land. And with Lamido’s suggestion, it will also end the unwholesome activities of those who impoverish their people of Niger Delta, creating an army of angry militants through the theft of oil revenues meant for development to buy off other peoples land in the name of federal land without paying compensation.

    It will also allow the acquisitive Igbos who take pride in thriving in other people’s land to plough back some of their wealth to their own land to end the revolt of the poor who are in the business of kidnapping for ransom of those who venture home at Christmas to display their wealth or to build ‘a place of the people’ among the squalor of the poor and the deprived as the great Ozunba Mbadiwe did.

    And for the South-west, restructuring will put an end to the mischief of our gifted and talented Yoruba leaders who dabble into other ethnic group affairs in the guise of exporting Yoruba values of liberalism and participatory democracy, which often result in the devastation of Yorubaland by vengeful feudal reactionary forces. It will encourage our leaders to devote their time and talents to the unfinished Awo and his compatriots’ crusade to create an egalitarian society that support free education, free health services, full employment and life abundance for our people. And for their own good, it will put an end to their coming back as body bags after venturing to the centre where they are not welcome.

    Restructuring rather than an elusive search for national character or common vision is a win-win situation for all. For instance it will be sweet justice for some northern states’ ex-governors like Sani Yerima of Zamfara State who according to retired ambassador Olu Aina ‘underwent indoctrination and exposure in all the training camps of Osama Bin Laden,’ before coming to launch his political sharia with fanfare supported by some northern leaders and others who sponsor some youths to Al-Qaeda training camps, if products of their political perfidy opted to take over the running of government of their states with strict application of Sharia law. After all, is it not said a people deserve the type of government they get?

  • How Nigeria should be restructured

    How Nigeria should be restructured

    As the debate on President Goodluck Jonathan’s speech entered its third day yesterday, focus shifted from issues raised in the speech to matters central to the National Conference and what to make of them. Opinions and counter-opinions flowed as delegates deliberated on issues of corruption, security, economic development or the lack of it, religion, and ethnic nationality with focus on the minority and majority question.

     While some of the speakers suggested that corrupt officers, especially those in public service, should face death sentence, others agreed that economic development with the practical consequence of job creation will check insecurity. Former Secretary to Government of the Federation Chief Olu Falae said Nigeria’s problem started when the military, in 1966, did away with regional government, which had served as a tonic for development of zones across the country, and introduced unitarism.

     The elder statesman also said that abolition of parliamentary system of government where power was with the entire cabinet and replacement with presidential system where powers lie with an individual had caused serious political crises in the country.

     Femi Falana, SAN, in a moving contribution, said the Conference, though not sovereign, has provided Nigerians with a window of opportunity “to find out why we are poor in the midst of plenty while a microscopic minority of the population is rich and smiling to the bank.” He added that corruption had endangered the corporate existence of Nigeria, and advocated political, social and environmental justice.

     Dalhatu Bashir from Jigawa State noted that Nigeria, at creation, came with a promise and it was that promise that moved the country in the right direction. For instance, he said the late Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, an Igbo, was born in Zungeru in Northern Nigeria, grew up in Igboland but went ahead to win election in the heart of Yorubaland. It was his view that if at the end, the outcome of the National Conference makes it possible for any Nigerian living anywhere in Nigeria to have equal rights of citizenship, then it would justify the reasons it was convened.

     Describing the President’s speech as stimulating, comprehensive and forthright, Ibrahim Bunu said delegates should not fail to negotiate, but cautioned that they should not negotiate out of fear since Nigeria belongs to everyone.

    On security, Abubakar Chika Adamu from Niger State said: “Nigeria is at war with itself. Security remains our greatest challenge. We must stop playing politics with it. We here must do what we ought to do and leave the President to do what he has to do to solve this problem.” On corruption, he observed that Nigerians have moved from mere stealing to looting and have graduated from looting to mass looting, but suggested that a soft-landing should be created for those who stole public funds to return them without being prosecuted.

    “We must be serious about fighting corruption,” said Magayi Dambatta; adding that for Nigeria to succeed in this, there was need to reorganize the anti-corruption agencies followed by diligent prosecution. A representative of Nigerian youth, Ben Dontoye demanded legal backing to the adoption of capital punishment against corruption, saying this would be the only way to drive fear into people who have taken to corrupt practices.

     Former Inspector General of Police, Ibrahim Coomasie cited absence of sincere leadership at different tiers of governance as one problem that Nigerians are worried about. Added to this, he said, was the intolerable level of insecurity in the country. He suggested that agencies constitutionally charged with maintenance of security in the country should be restructured and funded to achieve result.

     Retired General Muhammed Mansur Dan Ali informed the Conference that out of the 36 states of Nigeria, 33, if not more, have soldiers deployed to the streets. He said the National Conference should recommend complete restructuring of the Armed Forces of Nigeria and other security agencies for effective performance of their duties.

     Senator Seidu Dansadau made one appeal: that Jonathan should ensure that the recommendations of the Conference are implemented and not allowed to go the way of other recommendations in the past, saying it was time for delegates to re-examine themselves, “not just to say that we believe in the indivisibility of Nigeria but to practically demonstrate it.”

     His position was supported by Professor Godini Dara who insisted that the lofty ideas and recommendations expected at the end of the Conference must be implemented to free Nigeria from the grips of economic apartheid. On corruption, he said there was need to establish ethical standards; and on the economy, Dara strongly urged the President to free Nigeria from what he called the “witchcraft of the World Bank” while industrialization should take the front seat both in budgeting and planning.

     Both Illiya Danga and Burus Daleng remarked on the courageous decision of the President to go ahead with the Conference in spite of oppositions and wished that with the same courage, the President would implement the decisions of the Conference without fear or favour. Sale Dauda from Bauchi State attributed insurgency in every part of the country to the failure of states and local government who he said were totally dependent on what the federal government would do, instead rising to their responsibilities of providing leadership and governance. He said in some parts of the country, it has become difficult and even impossible to buy a piece of land for the purpose of building a church for worship and that those responsible for such prohibition were the elite.

     Francis Doukpolagha from Bayelsa State told the Conference that the failure of the Nigerian State stemmed from the fact that democracy has become government of the people by the people but not for the people. Ignatius Kevin Edet lamented what he called inequality and imbalance in the creation of local government areas in the country and urged the Conference to use the opportunity of the dialogue to correct the anomaly. He suggested the application of capital punishment as a check against corrupt practices by public office holders, a position enormously canvassed by other speakers.

    Veteran journalist, Ray Ekpu, said the President’s speech constituted a new thesis for the reconstruction of Nigeria and that Nigeria as it is today requires a new architecture. Ekpu noted that Jonathan seemed like someone who does not want “this house to fall,” still he said the house called Nigeria was too rickety and weather-beaten to be left on the wish list of a permanent structure. He said for a country that has had 14 different administrations in 53 years, “that is cyclical stability. There is no way a country can grow in this manner.”

    Dr Silas Eneyo from Rivers State likened Nigeria to a building with collapsed pillars and advised: “Let us not pretend to be painting a building whose pillars are collapsing.”

    Gary Enwo Igariwe said Nigeria is bleeding and down on its knees, urging delegates to identify reasons for conflicts and address them. He cautioned against selective solution, adding that “when you solve a problem in a particular area and ignore the ones in another area, you have not done anything; you are merely relocating the problem.” Igariwe said most of the problems can be easily resolved through restructuring of the country; advising that delegates should leave their ethnic standards and discuss Nigeria.

  • CODER: Nigeria must be restructured

    •Criticises Jonathan’s anti-corruption fight

    The Convener of the Coalition of Democrats for Electoral Reforms (CODER), Chief Ayo Opadokun, has said despite the abundant petrodollar in Nigeria, the nation has the most wretched people in Africa because of the country’s flawed structure.

    Opadodun addressed reporters in Offa, Offa Local Government Area of Kwara State, his country home, where he restated the need for the country to be restructured.

    The former Pan-Yoruba socio-cultural group Afenifere chieftain said President Goodluck Jonathan lacked the commitment and will power to fight corruption.

    He said: “Even with abundance of petrodollar in this environment, the most wretched people in the entire sub-continent of Africa reside in Nigeria. This is because we have refused to do the correct thing. The first significant step to take is that this country must be restructured. We are saying the only people that must legitimately be given the democratic privilege to sit down in representatives’ assembly are principally the ethnic nationalities.

    “They were the building blocks upon which Lord Lugard constructed the edifice they called Nigeria. The ethnic nationalities, along with other stakeholders – civil societies, professionals, etc – let us meet together to answer just two basic questions. These are on our staying together as a people and on what stand, the modus operandi, the rule of engagement of our relationship. We must answer those two questions.

    “It’s then we can have our own Magna Carta, our own Bill of Rights, as they do have in Britain and the United States of America. It is from then we can write our own Constitution that is indigenous.

    “All the Constitutions we had before 1963 were programmed by the Colonial Office of Great Britain in London. Five years into our so-called Independence, the military struck. Since then, all other constitutions have been programmed, facilitated and approved by the military.

    “So, Nigerians have not been given the opportunity to determine their nationhood; that’s the reason Nigeria remains a country instead of a nation. We have had the opportunity to turn around the fortune of the country but that had been messed up by the political elite either in uniform or agbada.”

    On Jonathan’s anti-corruption drive, Opadokun said: “I don’t believe President Jonathan can fight corruption. I am not saying this for the first time. I have been very straightforward and consistent about my position. I have no doubt in my mind that the factor that produced him was corruption-soaked and corruption-laden. He would be committing suicide if he says he will fight corruption.

    “The government has been prevaricating on the challenge ex-Minister of Education, Dr Oby Ezekwesili, threw at the government. They have been going round; they have not responded. She has asked that they engage her for a discussion over the matter.

    “She said the government she served left over 60billion foreign exchange dollarised before we left office. I will be pleasantly surprised if they can respond to that. Though if you ask me, I don’t think there is commitment and the will power to fight corruption.”