Tag: restructuring

  • ‘There will be no Nigeria without restructuring’

    Obong Victor Attah, 80, has always been passionate about politics. He was governor of Akwa Ibom State from May 1999 to May 2007 on the platform of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). Afterwards, the architect-turned politician ran for the 2007 presidential nomination of the party, but later withdrew. Since then, he has been playing the role of an elder statesman, particularly in Akwa Ibom politics. Attah spoke to some reporters in Lagos about what the victory of President Muhammadu Buhari portends for Nigeria, the governorship election in Akwa Ibom State and other issues. Deputy Political Editor RAYMOND MORDI was there.

    What is the significance of President Muhammadu Buhari’s victory?

    Throughout his first tenure, nobody can say that he was truly a party man in the conventional sense. Because of this, there were rumblings within his party. Some very big wigs were said to be considering leaving the party. In fact, some even thought that, by the time we get to the elections, the party would suffer an implosion. As it happened, that was averted. In his second coming, it is my conviction that he is going to pay even less attention to the party. With some serving governors being suspended from the party by the NWC for anti-party activities; with the earlier schisms that had gone to spawn new parties or swell the ranks of the PDP; with the evident shift in the support calculus, it is clear to me that, in the no–distant future, we will be singing its dirge. APC is going to be scattered – dead.

    If Atiku had won, it is possible that he would have atikulated this country to the next level – to borrow from the slogan of both parties. But, I also had the fear that, if Atiku wins and the PDP gets back in the saddle, this country would be plunged into an orgy of intolerable excesses. With what has happened now, it is obvious that the fortunes of the PDP are also most likely going to change.

    It took Atiku Abubakar, its presidential candidate, to provide that focus. Given his age and history of past attempts, this surely was for him a last ditch. With him off the scene, PDP is completely rudderless and with no anchor. It is safe to say therefore, that PDP too, which had also splintered in the past, will soon be scattered – dead.

    There was yet a third group – the military bloc. They did not hide their support for Atiku and the PDP. They openly showed their hand and have been spanked. Their influence therefore, is bound to wane. It is my prediction that from now on, we are going to witness less and less of those pilgrimages to Abeokuta and Minna.  With this loss of influence, it is also safe to say that the military oligarchy is dead. Buhari’s victory is the death knell to these power blocs.

    Read also:Akwa Ibom govt urges communities to protect projects against vandalism

    It has started the process of dismembering these menacing Behemoths, pulling out their fangs, blunting their claws and neutralising their sting. Buhari’s victory has returned power to the common man. Positions negotiated in Abuja and Lagos over the heads of the people can no longer be guaranteed. His victory has therefore given Nigeria a long-delayed but much needed opportunity for a new life; an opportunity to chart a new course. That is why for me his victory represents not only the triumph of the common man, but indeed also a great blessing for Nigeria. An opportunity has now been created for fresh hands, an opportunity for a new leadership, to take over. Nigeria can now look forward to a new birth. The phoenix can now rise out of the ashes and attain its destined glory.

    What should be the agenda of the administration in the second term?

    First and foremost, Buhari must put a stop to all and every agitation to split up this country and there is only one way to achieve this. He must see to it that we re-enact and reinstate the terms and conditions of the agreement that caused all the various peoples of this country, at independence, to agree to come together and form one country – federalism. Anything short of this is to court a disaster of unimaginable magnitude. The popular word today that describes this is restructuring. My prediction is that unless this is done, by the end of his tenure in the next four years, there may not be a country called Nigeria as we know it today.

    The second item on my agenda for the Buhari government is power. We must work relentlessly to see that in the shortest possible time every hamlet, every corner of this country enjoys twenty four hours constant supply of electric power. In today’s world, it is not a luxury but an absolute necessity.

    Third on my agenda is the fight against corruption. The fact still remains that if we do not kill corruption, corruption will kill us. This time the fight must be total and unsparing.

    Next, President Buhari must put a stop to all the killings, whether by herdsmen, or Libyan mercenaries, marauders, cattle rustlers or whoever. Already human life has been degraded enough and if the killings continue and farmers stop going to their farms, all the gains made so far towards food security by this administration will come to naught and we will again be faced with a major disastrous phenomenon.

    The final item on my agenda is the release of Leah Sharibu and the total annihilation of Boko Haram.

    How can the above agenda be realised?

    Given where we are now, there is a need for us to define the way forward. For me the way forward lies in a new beginning with a complete change of ethos and orientation. To achieve this I suggest the immediate formation of two national movements. The just concluded elections have done a lot to return power to the people and they have demonstrated that Nigerians want power to be held by people with integrity to which we should also add capability. Nigerians are completely fed up with people who seek power and positions just for the tyranny of controlling the treasury for themselves, their masters their investors and contractors rather than for the development of the real stakeholders – the people. I have no doubt that there abounds within our population of nearly two hundred million people, a sufficient number of quality people to whom the leadership of this nation can be trusted. So, the first movement, which I have suggested must be nationwide and not under the aegis of any political party, must be to search out the Moghalus of this nation. There must be quite a few of them. We must search for them, find them, groom them, assess them so that in less than the four years of this tenure, there will be no doubt in anybody’s mind as to who the people would want to be their next president. I should caution that this exercise, imperative as it is, would amount to an indulgence in extreme futility unless we also firmly re-establish the country. The next movement which must also be nationwide and not sponsored by any political party must therefore be the movement to restructure this country in a painless, equitably manner.

    If Buhari fails to restructure, where do you see Nigeria?

    Why do you call it pessimistic, because I don’t see a Nigeria without restructuring? I repeat, there can be no Nigeria without restructuring. What is going to happen is that the agitation for breaking up is going to get more violent, more virulent and the country will scatter. Certainly, Buhari would not allow that to happen. Even if his disposition today may not be one that says I am coming to restructure, when he knows that that’s what has to be done, so that there is a Nigeria for him to govern and handover to the next President, he will see the need to restructure.

    Must restructuring happen in the next four years?

    It doesn’t have to be in the next four years. But, it must begin now by laying the groundwork and he must show clear and sincere evident that we are moving towards restructuring. This is because the processes or the way to do restructuring equitably would entail a lot of negotiation to agree on how to do it. Do you know how long it took us to agree to form a federation at independence; some said we were ready, others said we were not ready. Restructuring is not going to be different. It is not going to be overnight, but we must agree that restructuring is what we must do, so that there can be a Nigeria.

    Have you the elders ever thought of taking a letter to President Buhari, explaining your position?

    Yes, an effort was made. I was interim chairman of the Pan-Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) and we sent a 16-point agenda to President Buhari. Our focus was essentially the Niger Delta, but on national level restructuring. The larger focus of Ohanaeze, the Igbos, is restructuring; Afenifere also restructuring. So, we had this southern leaders forum, which was joined by the Middle Belt and at the end of the day by some personalities from the North, such as Ango Abdullahi and Junaid Mohammed. I don’t know if they represented groups such as the Arewa Consultative Forum or not. So, we wanted this country restructured, but sadly we committed a blunder; the same mistake that the military bloc made. We identified ourselves with a candidate. So, we were seen like a political party. For me, that was where we derailed. If had just said, Atiku if you win you must restructure, Buhari if you win you must restructure and so on. In other words, focusing only on restructuring, we would have been in a better position today. That is why I said there must be a new national movement dedicated to restructuring and not by any particular candidate. When the idea of a Christian governor came up in Lagos, the proponents of that idea did not ally themselves with any particular party or candidate. But at the end of the day, the two major parties chose Christian candidates.

    How can this idea of a movement or third force be realised?

    The first step is to accept the concept; once we accept the concept a way out would be found… Don’t forget the basic principle is to make sure that Nigeria remains together as a country. It is my conviction that unless we restructure, there would be no Nigeria.

    During the campaign you did not speak on the politics of Akwa Ibom…

    Maybe you weren’t paying attention. In October of last year, I addressed a press conference where I said I believed Nsima Ekere of the APC has 80 per cent chances of winning the 2019 governorship election. But with Akpabio jumping out of the PDP to go and join Nsima Ekere’s camp, I think he is going to destroy the chances of that young man winning the election. I was very graphic and I don’t want to repeat some of the things I said. Akpabio was an uncommon governor who has suffered an uncommon defeat and rejection by the common people of Akwa Ibom State. The unfortunate thing however was that the rejection affected Nsima Ekere and the APC. I’m trying to say that Udom won entirely by default, but at one time nobody really gave credit to Udom for anything. But, after Jonah jumped out of the boat and the boat was sailing smoothly, people started to appreciate what Udom has done , because they looked at Udom from a different light. Don’t mind what anybody would tell you about Mike Igini, Udom won the election cleanly. If I must say, I believe that Igini is one of the finest INEC commissioners in this country.

    Did Udom win because of Akpabio?

    Yes!

    What is Akpabio’s baggage?

    You are the problem – the press – because you like to make people into what they are not. If from the beginning you listened and you were thorough, you will not have encouraged Akpabio to continue the way he was going. But you turned him into something else, to the extent that Vice President Yemi Osinbajo said it is not possible for Akpabio to lose. This is because he believed what you were writing about Akpabio.

     

  • Igbo insist on Atiku/Obi ticket, restructuring

    The Ohanaeze Ndigbo, and Alaigbo Development Foundation (ADF) have insisted on their endorsement of the Atiku/Obi ticket and restructuring.

    The groups, at an emergency meeting yesterday, reviewed recent events in the Nigerian polity as it relates to Ndigbo, especially in the aftermath of the postponed elections.

    The meeting expressed the solidarity and commitment of all Pan-Igbo groups and stakeholders to work together. “All pan-Igbo organisations and stakeholders, including IPoB and MASSOB, have promised to work together in the spirit of “onye-aghana-nwanneya”, even in the face of existential threat confronting us as a people.

    “We urge all Ndigbo to continue to live in orderly and peaceful co-existence with their neighbours, but refuse to be intimidated by anybody. We agree that the irreducible minimum for Ndigbo, which will be acceptable for their continued participation in the Nigerian enterprise, will be a renegotiated and restructured Nigeria based on equality, equity and justice and for the component regions and individuals who will live under its authority. “It must be one that ensures self-determination for the various nationalities, regional autonomy and freedom of the component regions to manage and control their political environment and resources.

    “Therefore, Ndigbo reiterates its unequivocal support and endorsement for the Atiku/Obi presidential ticket as already announced by the national leadership of Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide, Alaigbo Development Foundation, (ADF) and other Igbo interest groups.

    “We call on all Igbo registered voters, both at home and outside the Igbo homeland, to join all patriotic Nigerians of other ethnic nationalities and vote for the Atiku/Obi ticket. This election is our collective struggle for freedom and we must count it all joy to be part of history…”

    The meeting was attended by President-General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo Chief Nnia Nwodo; President of ADF Prof. Uzodinma Nwala; Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu, Prof. A. B Nwosu; leader of the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB), Uchenna Madu, among others.

  • Why restructuring is panacea to Nigeria’s problems, by Afe Babalola

    ELDER statesman and Founder of Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Aare Afe Babalola, SAN, has reiterated that Nigeria may continue to grapple with its prevailing problems of spiral unemployment, insecurity and under-development, unless the country treads the path of restructuring.

    Specifically, Babalola, who received the management team of the Nigerian Tribune in his office in Ado-Ekiti over the weekend, said until Nigeria goes back to implement the blueprint the trio of the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo, the late Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe and the late Sardauna painstakingly fashioned out for 10 years in Lancaster House, England between 1950 and 1960, Nigeria may find it difficult to evolve as a nation.

    His words :”Those who know me would appropriately recall that I have been championing the course of restructuring for some times now. On November 4, 2011, the descendants of His Majesty, King Abbi Amachree IV, the Amanyanbo of Kalabari, gathered together in Port-Harcourt to celebrate the First Memorial Lecture. The Board of Trustees, including the talented Prof. Tam David-West, brought together a large crowd including the Deputy Governor and the Vice President. I was honoured to deliver the 1st Memorial Lecture titled, ‘Nigeria in Search of a Nation’.

    “I was then and I am still an advocate of restructuring Nigeria. In my articles in the Vanguard and Tribune Newspapers on Wednesdays and Thursdays respectively, I have published many articles on the restructuring of the country. As a member of Constitutional Conferences, I have also argued in favour of true federal structure. The truth is that today, there is a strong wind of restructuring blowing over the country. It is not just strong a wind, it is a hurricane restructure. The loud voice of those who desire a united and strong country, which would deo volenti metamorphose into a nation is that the country should be restructured.”

    He thanked the management of the Nigerian Tribune, led by the Managing Director, Mr. Edward Dickson, for coming to congratulate him on his announcement as the winner of the much-treasured Obafemi Awolowo Leadership Prize for 2018.

    Chief Emeka Anyaoku, the chairman of the Selection Committee of the Obafemi Awolowo Leadership Award had announced at the 70th Anniversary of the rebranded Nigerian Tribune on January 29, 2019 that Babalola was voted the winner on account of the inherent qualities of political strategy, education, integrity, caring for the welfare of the masses, consistency policies and courage among several others, which constitute a veritable nexus that binds the first Premier of Western Region, the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Nigeria’s frontline legal icon, educationist and valiant entrepreneur as well as unsparing philanthropist, Aare Babalola, together.

    Anyaoku said Babalola was found worthy of the Prize because of what he described as his “genuine commitment to promoting the cause of humanity, which has marked you out as a philanthropist, whose social consciousness is a source of inspiration to millions of Nigerians”.

    Anyaoku added: “Afe Babalola has distinguished himself in the provision of quality education just like the sage, advocacy for the masses through legal intervention and other means to deserve the award”.

    The Obafemi Awolowo Leadership Award is for individuals, who have demonstrated the attributes of political strategy, education, integrity, caring for the welfare of the masses, consistency policies and courage among several others for which the late Premier of Western Region was well-known.

    Addressing his visitors, Babalola likened the place of the media in any society to what would happen to a blossoming flower in the desert, which will eventually wither away un-noticed and unsung, stressing that for institutions like the Nigerian Tribune and its array of talented editors and reporters, many of the accomplishments of his increasingly famous Afe Babalola University may have gone un-noticed.

    He praised the Awolowo Foundation for finding him worthy as the winner of the coveted Obafemi Awolowo Leadership Prize, which he described as invaluable on account of the achievements of his nine-year-old university, where he has been breeding a new generation of Nigerians and leaders.

    Delving into the accomplishments of ABUAD in its short history of existence, Babalola said: “Here in ABUAD, we have students from all the 36 states of the Federation and the Federal Capital Territory. And that makes us different. That stands us out. We are building a new generation of leaders that will change the world.

    Speaking on the departed sage in whose memory the Prize was instituted, Babalola hailed Awolowo for his firmness, kindness and fearlessness as a result of which he was able to make the old Western Region the clear leaders and a toast of other regions in those days.

    His words: “Continuity is the essence of government. A good leader must be firm, kind and fearless and we all know that Awo was fearless and we all know what he did as Premier of Western Region. Unfortunately, people conspired to jail him, but he remains a hero for ever.

    “If Chief Awolowo can wake up today, I am sure he will confirm what the Afenifere chieftain, Chief Reuben Fasoranti , said about me on November 12, last year, to wit: ‘Since creation, God has made billions of souls, but you, Aare Afe Babalola, must be in the league of the most caring, the most humble, the most contented, and the most selfless of all souls, (thereby) living true to the calling of selfless to humanity.

    “If it is possible for any mortal to be perfect, you will be my top nominee. Happy birthday to a wonderful and a quintessential human being. You are one in a kind. Enjoy your day to the hilt my Aare. God bless your heart and continually make you a shining star to mankind.”

    Earlier Dickson had congratulated Babalola for emerging the winner of the coveted Prize, thus making him the third African after Nigeria’s Prof. Wole Soyinka and former South Africa’s President, Mr. Thambo Mbeki.

    He stressed that the Prize confirmed Babalola in the mould of the late sage, who was well-known for his interest in education, human capital development and caring for the under-privileged members of the society.

    The Nigerian Tribune chieftain said Babalola’s winning the Prize for 2018 is the more worthy of celebration bearing in mind that the prize has not been won by anyone in the last four years because the meticulous selection committee for the award did not find anyone worthy in those four years to be so awarded.

    In Anyaoku’s words the Prize has not been awarded since Mbeki carted it home in 2014 because “there was no individual in Africa among nominees worthy to be honoured with the award in the last four years because none met the criteria spelt out to justify their candidacy for the honour”.

    According to him, the Obafemi Awolowo for Leadership Award is for individuals, who have demonstrated the attributes of political strategy, education, integrity, caring for the welfare of the masses, consistency policies and courage among several others for which the late Premier of Western Region was well-known, stressing that it was only Babalola, who was found worthy as an individual among the current nominees to receive the award.

    His words: “Afe Babalola has distinguished himself in the provision of quality education just like the sage, advocacy for the masses through legal intervention and other means to deserve the award.”

  • Restructuring: Between Afenifere and Osinbajo

    SIR: In Yoruba culture, you do not call an elder a liar. However, recent pronouncements by Afenifere elders about their own son and kinsman, Vice President Yemi Osinbajo that he does not believe in what the sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo believed inabout federalism is very far from the truth. This they gave as a reason for endorsing Abubakar Atiku. Osinbajo has fought and won battles in law courts fighting for the entrenchment of federalism more than any of the advocates now accusing him of working against restructuring.

    It is a very sad commentary on the conscience of our revered elders led by Chief R.F. Fasoranti and Chief Ayo Adebanjo. Professor Osinbajo has become a role model for the Yoruba race. Indeed, the DNA of the late sage, Chief Obafemi Awolowo is running in his blood by marriage. His boss, President Muhammadu Buhari is described by the international community as being “STINGY” because he is taking his time to pour the oil in tricklesrather than all at once in his style of governance. It is said that the foundation of character is the quality of integrity. Integrity here means honesty: always telling the truth. It is an expression of the person you really are inside. You cannot determine the beliefs, goals and values of what a person says, writes, or declares when running for public office. It is what a person actually does that shows the real truth about that person as we were taught.

    Nigerians should remember on Saturday that it is going to be “CAVEAT EMPTOR – BUYER BEWARE” and also “VOLENTI NON FIT INJURIA” meaning in law “you cannot complain from an injury caused from your own voluntary act”. If you vote in looters, don’t complain about an empty treasury. Atiku’s strategy about restructuring may be courageous and brave but certainly he is swimming against the tide and he is on his own. He cannot score own goal and expect to be applauded by his people. Alexander the great wanted to be master of the then known world. At the age of 15, the Delphic Oracle had told him he could live a long life full of peace or a short life full of glory. He chose the latter. Research has confirmed that before Nigeria can be successfully restructured, there must be a convincing class/social and power structure on ground, suitable to absorb the shock of the reorganization that will result, in order not to leave our northern brothers in the cold, already stripped naked of their past glory in agricultural exploits due to the discovery of black gold in the Niger Delta region.

    Buhari was elected in 2015 with a clear mandate to deal with corruption. Nigeria stands to lose if we do not give him the opportunity on Saturday to finish the assignment. He is presently the only strongman with charisma that can finish the job of dealing with looters and jailing them. We must not allow anyone to terminate any progress made so far on the anti-corruption war. We cannot trust a goat to watch over our yams anymore. We must avoid opening the gates to locusts coming to devour us again and bring about famine and death.

     

    • John R. Jimoh, Sagamu, Ogun State.
  • Why restructuring is key to unity, by Akinrinade

    Nigerians must come together to deliberate on the terms and conditions of living together as a nation, Gen. Alani Akinrinade said yesterday, even as he expressed support for the unity of the country.

    In the view of the former National Democratic Coalition (NADECO leader, for Nigeria to have an organised nation, the laws made by the military that “we are still running is not at peace with anybody, It cannot lift us all up, let alone one part at the expense of the other.”

    Gen. Akinrinade bared his mind yesterday at the inauguration of a new office building for the Yoruba Academy, at Agodi Government Reservation Area (GRA), Ibadan, Oyo State capital.

    The Yoruba Academy, which is committed to promoting modern democratic life of Yoruba race, acquired the office building on a N14 million lease agreement from Oyo State government for 25 years.

    Gen. Akinrinade, who facilitated the lease agreement with Governor Abiola Ajimobi, admitted that there were a lot of cheating and irritations in the law bequeathed to the nation by the military.

    He declared: “We must have to sit together and reorganise; we need to restructure and if we don’t, we will continue to dilly-dally and that is what the Yoruba are saying and it’s been a while they have been saying it.”

    On regionalism, Gen. Akinrinade said it would bring a lot of development, should Nigeria returns to regional government.

    His words: “Yes, it is possible. Just that it might be difficult. But whatever is not difficult might not need anybody to sit together and address.

    “In due course, all our eyes will be opened and we will all see that, there is no way we can make progress with our current structure and there are lots of cheating of some people at the expense of others.

    “Why won’t there be cheating, when we started, Lagos and Kano had 20 local governments each, but later, from Kano they cut out Jigawa and they have 71 local government areas in all.

    “The matter won’t have been seen as a cheating or get anybody angry if it was that the money each of the state spend is the ones generated on their own, but the money spent are from the same purse.

    “The revenues that made from the products some states refused to allow their sales are been shared and expended by such states. Recently, there was the story of a state governor in one of the Sharia states who obstructed a vehicle conveying beer and asked that all the products be destroyed, yet, the money generated from states where same products are been sold are been shared to all the states. How won’t that be seen as cheating. So, it is good that all the states run their separate lives.

    “When some states said they wanted to do Sharia, what is my business with that? I cannot ask you not to do Sharia but don’t just bring it to my state. If that is what their people want, let them go ahead and anyone of us from here who wants to go there would also know that, that was what they are doing there, and you must be ready to abide by their laws. But let it be clear that it is not the same laws that bind all of us together.

    “Back in those days, the Arewa states have their own laws. The laws they apply to arresting thieves is called penal code. And we have ordinary something similar to British code. It is very different. They have been using Sharia that endorses cutting of arms for a long time, just that we didn’t hear about it. If that’s what they want, it’s fine by everyone.

    “Because of such things, let us sit down, whatever we can do together, let us do it together and whatever we cannot do together, let us separate them.”

    In a lecture titled: “The imperative for the Yoruba Academy”, Development Agenda for Western Nigeria (DAWN) Commission Director-General Oluseye Oyeleye, described the academy as an institution charged with the task of bringing together everyone committed to engaging in, encouraging and funding research and systematic reflections on the history, culture, position and future of the Yoruba in the context of Nigeria and in a globalised world.

    According to him, the academy is an institutional framework for the totality of learning and development of Yoruba as a people.

    At the inauguration were: Afenifere Renewal Group , Chairman Olawale Oshun; Prof Ladipo Adamolekun; football legend Segun Odegbami; Ayo Afolabi, Princess Shola Alara; Femi Odere; Femi Egbedeyi; Dr. Adepeju Adigun and Dr. Iyabo Bashir; among others.

  • ‘Restructuring is a nation-building opportunity for Nigeria’

    Restructuring on a day and at an event in honour of a man for whom it represents a matter of principle. I hope that we can all agree that Restructuring is an important matter, despite the tendency of certain sections of our elite to trivialise it with their opportunism. With all sense of responsibility, I believe some Nigerians have made a career and livelihood around “restructuring” without deep thought, or a clear plan or implementation strategy. For them, it is a tool to alienate rather than convert our compatriots to the nation-building imperative that restructuring offers. Rather than the hard graft of solving our governance problems, this group would rather grab headlines and mouth sound-bites at opportunities like this. You can almost sense that this people actually dread restructuring becoming public policy, having succeeded in living off a serious national imperative for so long. We must be mindful of this class of people.

    Restructuring should be about the reform and improvement of our national efficiency. Reforming our governance structures is a crucial part of making our political system conducive to the pace of growth and development that our country needs. Along with better structures, fitted for efficiency and devolving responsibilities to the level of government best able to handle them, we must also invest in constructing a new national consensus and adapt our attitudes to uphold the values that enhance us all.

    In August 2017, the APC set up a committee on True Federalism, to clearly articulate a roadmap for political and constitutional reform, to help to give substance and structure to the debate on restructuring, and, perhaps, transform the erstwhile divisive discourse on federalism and restructuring into a nation-building event.

    1. In the course of the work of the APC Committee on True Federalism, which I had the privilege to chair, I was invited to give a talk on restructuring at Chatham House. During the talk in September 2017, I took pains to highlight that I was giving my personal views, not that of the party or the committee which was at that moment still consulting and researching on the matter. The APC Committee on True Federalism has since concluded its work and submitted its report. Despite chairing a party committee on true federalism, I want to reiterate that the views I am expressing here are strictly personal.
    2. The first public articulation of my views on the subject matter of ‘restructuring’ was in April 2012 when I published an article titled A Federation without Federalism. I believe the article reflected the broad consensus amongst Nigerians, then and now, that our federation has been dysfunctional. No thanks to the distortions introduced by military rule, our country is operating a governance structure that is more unitary than federal, and not optimised for delivering public goods to the generality of our people.
    3. Therefore, it is not surprising that there are pressures for reform. The federal idea has retained its allure for virtually all segments of the country. Perhaps, that is because it is a choice freely made by our people during the agitations and negotiations for independence. Under British auspices, our founding fathers debated and settled for federalism as the political structure for a free and independent Nigeria. It was successfully argued that a diverse country like Nigeria could best thrive as a federation. And the political arrangements that ushered Nigeria to independence were unmistakably federalist, enshrined in the 1960 and 1963 constitutions and operationalised through strong regional governments.

    The political giants that led the old regions competed to do their best for their respective peoples. The Western Region launched the first public television service in Africa, a few years after adopting a free education policy that consolidated its head start in western education by extending universal access to the masses. Each of the three original regions founded its own university, built industrial estates, established development finance institutions, and developed hospitality businesses, among others. The regional governments also tried to build the physical infrastructure needed for a modern economy.

    1. Some of the most enduring institutions in Nigeria were built by these regional governments, hence the understandable nostalgia in some quarters for the federal structure of Nigeria to revert to the regions of old. However, some of our minority communities across the country also retain memories of political agitations against the dominant groups in their respective regions. But that in no way diminishes the fact that the regional governments upheld federalism. It is only a reminder that while there are no perfect political arrangements, there are many workable and sustainable governance structures.

    The termination of the First Republic in January 1966 dealt a fatal blow to democracy and federalism in Nigeria. The two comings of the military, lasting about 30 years in total, distorted Nigeria into a unitary state. The four-year gap between the first coming of the military and their second coming saw a brief resurgence of the federal ideal. For instance, between 1979 and 1983, Lagos State, under the Awoist government of Chief Lateef Jakande, established a state university, a radio station and a television service. Other states like Kano under the leadership of Governor Abubakar Rimi of blessed memory, also followed suit establishing a state newspaper and TV station. But this was just a brief interlude in the steady degradation of federalism.

    1. In my view, the pragmatic argument for restructuring is compelling. Restructuring is not just a matter of ideology, it has become one of effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability. Societies make progress when sound and effective governance provides equal opportunities for citizens to realise their fullest potentials. It seems logical that the flexibility of federalism suits a large and heterogenous entity like Nigeria better than the rigidity of unitarism. Our Founding Fathers realised this in the 1950s. Their military successors did not, and what was a stop-gap arrangement to prosecute the civil war became nearly permanent for three decades. The review of taxation powers in favour of the FG helped raise revenues to fund the war, but having achieved its purpose, the powers taken from the state were not swiftly repatriated.
    2. The resultant concentration of power and resources at the centre expanded the federal bureaucracy, emasculating the states in favour of a powerful centre that did very little well. By getting involved in virtually everything, the Federal Government became good at almost nothing, to everyone’s loss. The things that secure and unify our country, and make it a common space for equal citizenship, commerce, free movements of people, goods and services, should be within the purview of the Federal Government, and often, not exclusively. The Federal Government should build and sustain a stronger military and invest in the people and technology that can ensure better intelligence-gathering capacity for national security.

    Many wrongly equate the decimation of federalism, not to the military mindset of unitary command-and-control, but to so called “northern oligarchy”. The truth is the most unitary government we ever had was that headed by General  J T Aguiyi-Ironsi, who is not from Northern Nigeria. The coincidence of the mind-set of most of the military leaders being of Northern origin must not be confused with that of the ordinary Northerner! I want to state here and now, that not only is the North ready, willing and able to embrace inclusive restructuring of our polity, but to add that those that speak loudly against it represent no one. Most of them have never held elective office, and therefore do not appreciate that the North with its natural endowments stands to be the biggest beneficiary of restructuring.

    Without any doubt, the Federal Government needs to devolve more powers to the states, and the states to the local governments. Many of the challenges that confront our country are best resolved at the sub-national level. How well our children are educated in the first nine years of schooling is down to the states and local governments. Improving health outcomes for our people, easing and widening access to primary health care, providing routine immunisation to protect children against vaccine-preventable diseases, guaranteeing ante-natal care and safe delivery for pregnant women are all public services that are within the powers of states and local governments. The provision of extension services to farmers, construction of feeder roads and aggregation centres for farm produce, are all state and local level functions, that the Federal Government can never do very well.

    The devolution of more powers and responsibilities to the states creates many options for productive collaboration between state and federal governments. We saw an instance of that during the closure of Abuja airport in 2017. The Federal Government and Kaduna State worked together to make the Kaduna airport a viable alternative. The Kaduna State Government built a 5Km road to link the FG-owned train station in Rigasa to the airport. The Federal Government has also given its consent to our request to re-designate two major roads in Kaduna, our state capital, as state roads. The Federal Executive Council granted our wishes, restoring the two roads (Ahmadu Bello Way and the Western By-pass) to our control and saving us the inconvenience of seeking permission from a federal bureaucrat before we can install street lights on a major road in our state capital.

    As I have argued previously, I do not believe that a single, centralised police force can deliver on the necessity to visibly project state power and enforce the law in this vast country of ours with nearly 200 million people. As a state governor, I can testify that we simply do not have enough police officers in this country. That is why the military is involved in internal security operations in most of our states. During the most recent outbreak of violent crisis in Kaduna, the determined efforts of civilian volunteers to secure their communities, helped us considerably to stabilize and normalize the situation.

    While Nigeria is constitutionally a federation of 36 states, I do not believe that as far as local governments are concerned, a uniform, constitutionally-enshrined system makes sense. The diversities at the local level can best be accommodated by retaining the provisions of the Constitution requiring a democratic local government system, and leaving the structural details like the number of local governments, their boundaries and headquarters to legislation by the State House of Assembly.

    The total revenue allocation to all Local Governments from the Federation Account should therefore be determined and fixed, leaving it to the State House of Assembly to legislate on the vertical and horizontal sharing arrangement. The state governments can then flexibly restructure and re-design the local government system, consistent with the history, culture, demography and endowments of the state. In Kaduna State, for instance we are devolving responsibility for the fire service, adult literacy, agricultural extension and the like to the local government councils. The state government bears partial burden for the strengthening of the primary healthcare system for eventual full transfer to the local government councils.

    1. In the interim, a devolution settlement arising from a restructured Nigeria will require a review of the revenue allocation formula. This will entail reducing the 52% the Federal Government takes and increasing the share going to the states and local governments. But a successful restructuring will ultimately change the whole concept of revenue allocation, in the sense that states will be required to basically pay their own bills. Our states ultimately have to find and develop the revenue sources that can sustain their functions. Given the condition of many of our states, this will take some time, but it is apparent that many governors are paying closer attention to raising more internally-generated revenue.

    The APC Committee on True Federalism submitted its report last year. Before I conclude this address, it is important to remind us of the major recommendations. The committee recommended that the federation be rebalanced, with more powers and responsibilities devolved to the states. The committee also clarified that the federation is a relationship solely between the states and the Federal Government, and that each state should be allowed to operate the system of local government that best suits it. In our diverse nation, it is only prudent to concede that one size or structure of local governance does not fit all.

    The recommendations cover how the states will generate the resources that will fund their envisaged expanded burdens, responsibilities and authority. The derivation principle is upheld as a primary component of fiscal federalism. We have recommended that control of mineral resources be vested in the states which will pay applicable royalties and taxes to the Federal Government. To make this work, extant laws such as the Petroleum Act, the Mining and Minerals Act, the Land Use Act and the Petroleum Profit Tax Act would be consequentially amended. The Committee argued that the derivation principle would also apply to hydro-power and other forms of renewable power generation, since like crude oil and gas, they constitute sources of wealth-creation.

    As noted earlier, there should be an upward review of the share of federation revenues accruing to the states as the Federal Government devolves more responsibilities and functions to them. The Committee was of the view that many current big-ticket activities of the Federal Government like Agriculture and Policing can be significantly reduced and most of these responsibilities devolved to the States and local governments. Even in seemingly helpful areas like healthcare, building primary health centres by the Federal Government is an avoidable aberration.

    The Committee therefore recommended that the following items be transferred to the Concurrent List and therefore fall under the jurisdiction of both the states and federal government:

    1)  Police

    2)  Oil and Gas (other than offshore oil and gas in the Continental Shelf and Extended Economic Zone)

    3)  Mines and Minerals (other than offshore minerals in the Continental Shelf and Extended Economic Zone)

    4)  Railways

    5)  Prisons

    6)  Fingerprint and criminal identification records

    7)  Stamp Duties

    8)  Registration of Business Names, and

    9)  Food, Drugs and Poisons (other than Narcotics)

    One recommendation of the Committee that is worthy of serious and urgent consideration is the federalization of the Judiciary. The current unitary judicial system that vests exclusive power to discipline every judge in Nigeria in the NJC is another aberration that should be abolished. In its place, each state should have its State Judicial Council, and the running costs of each state judiciary should be duly budgeted and appropriated by the State House of Assembly, rather than the National Assembly.

    If Kaduna State needs and can afford 40 High Court judges, why should the elected leaders of the state need the permission and consent of an un-elected council in Abuja to appoint and pay them? This undue concentration of absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely, as the recent revelations about the Chief Justice of Nigeria’s forgotten, undeclared bank accounts and cash balances indicate.

    To give effect to these recommendations, the Committee has produced draft bills to amend the Constitution and relevant statutes accordingly. It is my earnest conviction that when the relevant party organs consider and accept the report, these draft bills can be swiftly forwarded for the consideration of the National Assembly.

    This country was born with so much promise. Many of those founding dreams have been sadly deferred. But I believe that we can devise a governance structure that is fit for purpose and that harnesses our best talents for the forward push. I wish to reiterate once more that restructuring represents a nation-building opportunity, giving all the parts of this country a chance to develop their resources, and to cooperate creatively.

    Successful restructuring depends also on our national resolve to protect the idea of a common citizenship. The rights guaranteed under the Constitution should be enjoyed by every citizen, no matter where they reside, and no matter which part of the country they hail from. A restructuring of mentality and values is a key factor in the success of a restructuring of the governance and political structure.

    • Excerpts from Keynote address by Malam Nasir El-Rufai, Governor of Kaduna State, at the Colloquium on Restructuring, organized to mark the 80th Birthday of Chief Bisi Akande, held at the Prof. Ogunlesi Hall, University College Hospital, Ibadan, on Wednesday, 16th January 2019

     

  • Osinbajo and legal approach to restructuring

    It is not dishonest for the All Progressives Congress (APC) to be frank about the difficulties it is facing over the issue of restructuring Nigeria. Since it won the presidency in 2015, the party has become less eloquent about a matter it had fervently and almost lucidly espoused before that year’s general election. Indeed in the eyes of the electorate, there was nothing ambiguous about the party’s offering on restructuring. However, in the foreseeable future, judging from the presentations made by two of the party’s leading functionaries at a colloquium to mark Bisi Akande’s 80th birthday in Ibadan on Wednesday, the party will continue to wrestle with the subject and be humbled by its weakened ability to speak with clarity and resolution. Vice president Yemi Osinbajo asks those advocating restructuring to go to court to argue their case; and Kaduna State governor Nasir el-Rufai, forever obsessed with questions of scope and magnitude, suggests that his party has the best recipe for restructuring, going by the report of a committee headed by him.

    Chief Akande, the celebrant, was a one-term governor of Osun State and first national chairman of the APC. He is today celebrated, as the Ibadan event exhibited to his honour, for his principles and commitment to democracy and good governance. It is ironical that the celebrant is neither as evasive about restructuring as Prof Osinbajo and Mallam el-Rufai, nor as disingenuous over how best to get the retuning done. Marking his birthday last year, Chief Akande had radically suggested that Nigeria should consider parliamentarianism as the better system of government, asserting that presidentialism was not working. He did not mince words, and he left no one in doubt what the country needed to do to remake itself in order to achieve stability and growth.

    But at the colloquium in Ibadan, perhaps wary of being accused of deliberately forsaking the struggle for restructuring simply because he had become a member of the government, Prof Osinbajo spoke of using the detached and safe instrument of litigation to restructure Nigeria. The idea seemed far-fetched, an idea no one had really thought or spoke of, not even he in all his previous discussions on the subject. It is not clear how the idea came to him, or why he thinks that litigation seems the plausible instrument to tackle a complex political issue as restructuring. But as he goes along, and as his contemplations morph from one arcanum to another, the country is likely to be regaled with more newfangled ideas about how to help the country regain its political and existential composure.

    Here is how the vice president rationalised the subject: “The government of Lagos State demonstrated that it is possible to have restructuring and devolution of power by process of litigation. As of 1999 when I first had encounter with the former governor of Lagos State, Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, he made it clear to me that one of his objectives for us is to pursue fiscal federalism and devolution of power for our state. We spent a lot of time and resources to look into how we could do it. We knww that going through the National Assembly was just a waste of time. We then decided to use the process of litigation. As a matter of fact, we went to the Supreme Court on 12 different times on what we can describe as restructuring. The Federal Government at that time opposed every move we made…Fortunately for us, we were able to record successes. The achievements are gains of litigation. We can only get it through the court. As a region, if we are talking about restructuring, we should look at it from the point of view of the court.”

    But the devil is in the detail. The vice president forgot to tell his audience that the state went to court because the federal government attempted to arrest the process of local government creation, and even went ahead to withhold the state’s local government allocations. More, the vice president also forgot to indicate that while the state successfully litigated the aspect of withheld allocations, it has so far been unsuccessful in litigating and legitimising the creation of additional local governments. The truth is that, for instance, there can be no successful litigation of the creation of additional local governments. It is a conundrum that can only be resolved by restructuring, yes, not even the limited restructuring advocated by the el-Rufai committee.

    The vice president may be a professor of law, a qualification that makes litigation attractive to social conservatives and exponents of law like him, but he is not a politician in the classical sense, one who knows or feels instinctively the limits and possibilities of using law to resolve complex political issues that respond only to political panaceas. Nigeria is not alone in battling such dilemmas. In the United States, it is doubtful whether law, as in Roe V. Wade, rather than legislation through political debates was a better answer to the abortion conundrum that has assailed that country for decades. Prof Osinbajo is obviously too optimistic to think that litigation can help restructure the country. It cannot, even if its intractability can be overcome. The el-Rufai committee adumbrated a number of constitutional issues necessary for restructuring. But they are neither exhaustive nor attractive to the unyielding executive opposed to their implementation. It will take a willing and visionary president to embrace a report inspired by the party, not one inspired by the executive.

    Admittedly, there is no consensus on restructuring, with a backward-looking presidency fearing it might balkanise the country, and some sections of the country fearing it might put them at a disadvantage. Rather than see its possibilities, many opponents see its limitations. In the courts, should the matter unadvisedly get there, and assuming interested parties have the time and money to litigate, piecemeal restructuring would simply mummify in the cacophonous rage of various ethnic and other interest groups. No, litigating restructuring cannot work. It worked only partially for Lagos State. It can do no more. It is protracted and expensive, and the result doubtful and meagre. For a matter as complex as restructuring, the way to go is through political debates, consensus building, and then legislation, all the products of efforts driven by a visionary president.

    The APC never promised restructuring in its manifesto. It carefully worded its support only for power devolution. But even that has remained unattended to. After breaking that limited promise, the party has now engaged in various forms of political and ideological somersaults. If it is not punished at the next polls, it will be partly because despondent voters are unsure that the leading opposition party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), can be trusted to embrace restructuring at a level that is comprehensive and feasible, not simply an election gimmick. Luckily for Nigeria, crude oil, the resource that binds the country together, is fast becoming irrelevant to global economies. In less than a decade or two from now, the cost of drilling oil may well outweigh its benefits. When that time comes, Nigeria will then have to face squarely its existential question. But given the country’s internal contradictions that are maturing at a fast and alarming rate, it is even doubtful whether the country would not be compelled to face its existential question sooner than its retrograde economy makes it even more compelling.

  • Gani Adams calls for restructuring

    The Aare Onakakanfo of Yorubaland, Chief Gani Adams, on Saturday said the restructuring of Nigeria was important for the country to rise above its  challenges and stay on the path of progress.

    Adams made the statement in Lagos at the installation  of 21 Aare Onakakanfo chiefs –in-council.

    Some dignitaries who attended the elaborate ceremony are Mrs Titi Atiku-Abubakar, Wife of the Presidential Candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP),    Chief Gbenga Daniel, Director-General of the Atiku Campaign Organisation and a former governor of Ogun, and Abiola, Wife of Mr Jimi Agbaje, the PDP Governorship Candidate in Lagos.

    Adams said that restructuring to strengthen all the federating units would accelerate development of Nigeria.

    ‘’Solution to  the problems bedeviling Nigeria is for the country to adopt restructuring.

    “We are living with these problems because we are relunctant to retrace our steps and adopt the system that suits us.

    Adams added that strengthening the federation units would help the country to realise its  development goals.

    He said that the appointment and installation of the 21 chiefs was to assist him in his assignment as the Aare Onakakanfo, for success.

    He said that Yorubaland was vast and that he needed to delegate responsibilities to people across all the Yoruba speaking states since he could not be everywhere at the same time.

    Adams said that appointment of chiefs by Aare Onakakanfo had precedence and that his action was sanctioned by the Alaafin of Oyo, Oba Lamidi Adeyemi.

    ‘’I appointed these 21 chiefs to help me to succeed. As the Aare Onakakanfo, my job covers the entire Yorubaland, but I cannot be everywhere at the same time.

    ‘’The people I am installing today as chiefs from everywhere we have indigenous Yoruba people, including Kogi and Kwara, will act for me in their respective domains and handle issues.

    ‘’They will interface with their local Obas and traditional chiefs to ensure peace and development in Yorubaland.

    ‘’I am not the first Aare to have appointed chiefs. In fact, I am the 13th Aare to have done that.

    “The only two who did not appoint chiefs were Aare Abiola and Akintola, and that was because they were seriously engaged in politics and had limited time,” he said

    Adams that the appointment was  to ensure effective service  in the interest of the Yoruba race.

    He said thst he would soon appoint a 70-member advisory council to advise him and his chiefs on ways to further move the Yoruba race forward.

    He urged the 21 chiefs who, he said, were selected based on their pedigrees, to justify the confidence reposed on them, by serving the people diligently.

    Daniel hailed Adams at the event for his efforts to move the Yoruba race forward.

    He urged the  Yorubas to always speak in one voice  as unity was important for  progress.

    NAN reports that some of the  installed chiefs are a Labour Party chieftain, Dr Kayode Ajulo (Maiyegun Aare), Mr Ademola Ige (Baameto Aare), Mr Shola Oshunkeye (Baaroyin Aare) and Prof.Taofeek Raheem (Parakoyi Aare). (NAN)

  • Restructuring not a one-bullet solution, says activist

    THE idea of regarding restructuring as a one-bullet solution to Nigeria’s current political and socio-economic challenges has been described as an exercise in self-deceit.

    Socio-political activist and the President of Core Caucus, a socio-political group, Prof Dele Fapohunda, made the remark while addressing a group of youths from the Southwest chapter of the group recently.

    Fapohunda said restructuring is critical to the country’s development, “but it represents just one of the needed interventions”. He added: “To think that all will be well by mere redefinition by geography and ownership of regional wealth without a conscious effort to vet the characters in our public life is an exercise in self-deceit.”

    The activist said much of the country’s problems are linked to personal structural malfunction that can make all genuine steps to achieve macro restructuring a failed effort.

    The biotechnologist said a virtual return to 1998 is needed to restart, refocus and redefine the country’s direction. He added that there is also the need to redefine the concept of leadership and followership.

    He said: “This is the only way the much loved restructuring can occupy its place as a critical ingredient, among others, capable of landing us in a peaceful and productive nation state.

    “Restructuring is good but it represents just one of the needed interventions. For example, in today’s Nigeria, an expensive presidential system should be summarily discarded. Western forms of democracy cannot flourish in Nigeria until western type discipline is made systemic and wholesale.”

    Fapohunda said more focus on morality than legality is required in a nation with a wide gap between the rich and poor, to ensure social justice.

    He added: “Why would a governor, confirmed to be engaging in grim and binge looting, while in office, still qualified for severance package,  and life salary? In simple terms, it means you get paid for life for plundering your state! A home-grown parliamentary political package seems fairly attractive for now.

    “A governor will collect money from Abuja, refuse to pay workers salary, go ahead and settle godfathers, and amass properties with the rest and yet state institutions are there to be deployed to his advantage.

    “A leader imposes his son, wife and other relations on the people. How will restructuring stop that? Did Ahmadu Bello, Awolowo or Zik impose their children on the people at any time?? Every year budgets are read and passed and executed, yet many young ones emigrate at a high rate. So, all the annual budget does is to expel Nigerian youths from Nigeria.”

     

  • Restructuring: Buhari should set the tone for debate, says Dickson

    Governor Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa State has challenged President Muhammadu Buhari to set the tone for the debate on the restructuring of the country.

    The president, Dickson said, should deploy the “power, influence and authority of that office to mobilise our country to do the restructuring.”

    He spoke  at the launch of a book, “We are all Biafrans” written by  a human rights activist, Chido Onumah  in Abuja.

    Dickson expressed disappointment that Buhari has not lived up to expectation on the restructuring issue.

    “I regret to say that I feel disappointed that the president didn’t rise to the occasion. It’s a tragedy for our country and also a major tragedy for his own leadership,” he said.

    He also told agitators of a republic of Biafra that it is not feasible, saying it is too late to break Nigeria or allow secession agitation to thrive.

    He asked those demanding for the Republic of Biafra to forget the dream.

    But he said it is time for the restructuring of the country to ensure justice and equality for all.

    He said: “If we are all Biafrans is about the tendency of any part of that country that wants to move out, I don’t believe in that path. I will therefore say that we are all Nigerians.  We disavowed the geographical Biafra, our country does not need it.

    “Let us be very clear, this is our country. No one owns this country than the other. I will rather want to join forces to fight for the new Nigeria this country needs. We need a new Nigeria for the weak and the strong; an egalitarian Nigeria; a nation of justice and equal opportunities. But not the idea of balkanizing. We are not going to leave this country.

    “We should however not run away from the issues raised in the book. If all is well, no one will talk of moving out.

    “These days, people are scared of holding views or position. I don’t know what you are doing in public space if you cannot express your views.

    “What did our founding fathers do that we are failing to do. They sat down, dialogued, disagreed, sometimes walking out of conferences, all those are political tools.

    “We shouldn’t be afraid of disagreeing. In fact, we need more disagreement. But the important thing is whether we agree or disagree should be in national interest.”

    Dickson said Nigeria is ripe for restructuring in order to make progress.

    “With the way it is, our country is not structured to work.  Instead of talking about issues that will bring development, people bring up issues about our fault lines.

    “We need restructuring. This election will be a referendum on restructuring. We cannot continue to run Nigeria in this manner.”