Tag: Rivers Emergency

  • Rivers Emergency: How has Ibas fared?

    Rivers Emergency: How has Ibas fared?

    May 29, 2023, witnessed the most peaceful transition from one government to another in Rivers State since the current democratic dispensation in the country began in 1999.

    The then Governor, Chief Nyesom Wike, who is now the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Abuja handed over the reins of power to his then begotten godson and successor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara at the Yakubu Gowon’s Stadium in Port Harcourt.

    Fubara, who hails from the Ijaw ethnic stoic, said to be marginalized in the governance of Rivers, was the chosen one and Wike, his benefactor, choreographed the entire process that enthroned the new governor. The state waxing under the mantra of continuity and consolidation was calm and progressive.

    The chemistry between the two leaders was so excellent that Fubara used to address Wike as “our father” and “my leader”. He would hardly make any statement without acknowledging Wike’s role in his emergence.

    Nobody including the prophets foresaw the doom that lurked around the state and no one foretold that an immediate intractable political crisis hovered around the oil-rich state.

    Moreso, there were no signs that the crisis when it started would be so deep that it would force the state out of democratic governance before May 29, 2025, the first of its kind since 1999.

    What started as a mere misunderstanding among members of the same political family was mismanaged and allowed to create rancorous division that kept the state on edge for many months. Politically, the crisis shattered the peace of the state.

    It snowballed into a dangerous power play between the executive and the legislative arms of government. The legislature was absolutely sidelined in the governance of the state following misinterpretations of actions and events. People watched as the rule of law was trampled upon in Rivers rubbishing the whole essence of democracy.

    The judiciary became busy churning out orders, judgements and counter orders on multiple litigations filed by the warring parties. There was political chaos in the state as both the legislature and the executive remained obdurate in their contrived convictions not to work with each other.

    But the Supreme Court waded in and resolved the dispute in favour of the Speaker Martins Amaewhule-led House of Assembly. Despite the Supreme Court judgement, both arms of government maintained their obstinacy. They started another cat and mouse game deliberately refusing to implement the judgement of the Supreme Court.

    Fresh tension began to rear its ugly head in the state and foreboding of violence became stronger following the move by the Rivers State House of Assembly to impeach the governor. The act was perfected; Fubara’s removal was imminent and nothing would have saved the situation. Infact, there was confusion and tension in the state.

    Militants regrouped in the creeks and threatened fire and brimstone. Different groups issued warnings and vowed to vent their anger on critical national assets especially oil installations and innocent residents should anything happen to Fubara.

    In no time, unknown attackers started bombing oil installations. The Trans Niger Delta pipeline was the first target and it went up in flames causing panic among residents. Attacks on other oil facilities were reported in some local government areas in the state.

    Acting on security reports and the need to halt the looming dangers and the economic as well as security  consequences of the plot to remove the governor, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, declared a state of emergency and suspended Fubara and the House of Assembly.

    He immediately appointed Vice-Admiral lbok Ibas (retd), a former Naval Chief, as the Sole Administrator of Rivers thereby truncating democratic governance in Rivers.

    What has Ibas been up to since his appointment? In his presidential brief, Tinubu directed Ibas to oversee the governance of the state for the first six months pending the resolution of the political crisis. He told the administrator not to make laws but to formulate policies for the effective administration of Rivers.

    In fact, Ibas at the resumption of his emergency duties in Rivers was greeted with mixed feelings. Unusual calm enveloped the state few days after his appointment. His maiden state broadcast captured the essence of his mission.

    Addressing Rivers for the first time, Ibas said: “My mandate is clear; to restore law and order, stabilise the polity and to create the necessary conditions for the full restoration of democratic institutions and representation.

    “My appointment comes at a difficult and consequential moment in history. The political impasse of nearly two years in Rivers State has paralysed governance, desecrated democratic institutions, threatened security and undermined the economic and social fabric of the state.

    “It has deepened divisions among the people, and cast a shadow of uncertainty over the future.  These are realities we can not afford to ignore. As a son of the Niger Delta,  I am one of you. And I recognise the weight of this moment. The expectations of the people, and the challenges that lie ahead. 

    “The uneasy calm that pervades the state is palpable and I feel the weight of families, young and old, businesses, that have made both little and huge investments in Rivers State, uncertain what the immediate future holds.”

    Perhaps, realizing the troubles ahead of him, the sole Administrator held some critical stakeholders’ engagements. Beyond meeting with with senior and junior workers in the Government House as well as security officers in charge of the Government House, Ibas  reviewed files, memos, documents and allayed the fears of the civil servants on the payment of their salaries.

    Ibas immediately disclosed that he had received the seized state revenue allocations and approved the payment of salaries. Ibas met with traditional rulers and Nigeria Union of Local Government Employees (NULGE).

    Ibas told NULGE: “Let me assure that the withheld allocations have now been released, and I hereby issue a directive that all the necessary steps be taken to ensure that these salaries are paid with no further delay.

    “As leaders we must feel the pains of our people and offer them a more positive, inclusive and transformative leadership. This is the mandate I have accepted and it is the standard I expect from all of you.”

    To the traditional rulers, he said: “Let us remind our people that the progress of Rivers State is a shared responsibility and that only unity and cooperation can overcome the challenges before us.

    “Your Royal Majesties, in my quest for peace and stability, it is imperative that traditional rulers shun all acts of partisanship either through their actions, speeches or body language. The traditional institution must remain a neutral and impartial arbiter, respected by all for fearless and integrity.

    “I urge you to distance yourself overtly and covertly from any acts of cultism, violence, vandalism or anything that is illegality. Traditional rulers must not condone any action that does not promote economic good. Therefore, you are expected to report any forms of illegality or abuse to relevant authority.”

    Ibas, in his next line of action proceeded to direct the Heads of Local Government Administration (HILGA) in the 23 local government areas to submit reports containing the activities of their respective councils to the Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Local Government.

    He announced the suspension of all the political office holders especially those appointed by Fubara. Those he suspended were the Secretary to State Government (SSG), the Chief of Staff, commissioners, chairmen and members of all boards, councils of agencies, commissions, institutions and parastatals, special advisers, special assistants and senior special assistants.

    He insisted that the development said was in line with the powers conferred on him by President Tinubu. He went ahead to appoint and inaugurate a new SSG, Prof Ibibia Lucky Worika.

    Undoubtedly, the suspensions of political office holders and MDAs and the appointment of a new SSG caused some hullabaloo in the state. But Ibas deafened his ears and undertook further controversial decisions.

    The Sole Administrator cancelled all pending procurements and tender processes carried during the period that Rivers operated without budgets saying the decision was in adherence to the Appeal Court’s ruling in suit number CA/ABJ/CV/133/2024.

    He created uproar in some quarters when he hinted that his administration was developing a new budget for the state. He promised that the process would be transparent and all-inclusive.

    Ibas said: “We are in the process of putting together a new budget that reflects our commitment to healthcare, education, social services, as well as the continued infrastructural development of our state”.

    But since he made the statememt, he had said nothing about the new budget perhaps because of the backlash that trailed the announcement. Ibas further took some bullets when  he appointed  administrators for the 23 local government areas in the state. He further  reconstituted some of the suspended boards of agencies, commission’s, and parastatals.

    But he defended his decision to appoint administrators for the 23 local government areas in the state saying it came from his findings when he visited some of the councils.

    He said after the visits, he realized that he needed people to help him at the grassroot level to enable him actualise the mandates of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    But Ibas been inspecting some projects, which were being executed by Fubara before his suspension. The first project he inspected was the ongoing reconstruction of the demolished House of Assembly complex, part of the victim of the crisis. The administrator acknowledged that the project was in an advanced stage. He visited other relics of the crisis such as the local government secretariats of Ikwerre and Emohua, which were attacked during the crisis.

    The administrator has also been dealing with series of protests against his position in the state. He has been battling with legitimacy crisis. Women from various walks of life especially those in support of Fubara have been on the streets querying Ibas’ mission in the state. They have called him many names such as impostor, stranger among others to emphasize their disapproval of his administration. The protesters continued to call on Tinubu to sack Ibas and reinstate Fubara and the suspended lawmakers.

    Others have also been linking their negative actions to the emergency rule forcing reactions from the sole administrator. For instance, the Chief Magistrate of the Judiciary of Rivers State, Ejike King George, recently  embarked on a voluntary retirement citing the ongoing emergency rule in the state.

    George in a letter he addressed to the Secretary, Rivers State Judicial Commission, said his decision was informed by the recent appointment of a quasi-military administration to run the affairs of Rivers.

    George said: “This difficult and regrettable decision is informed largely by my discomfort with the recent appointment ofa quasi-military administration to run the affairs of a modern State like ours.”

    But later, the Rivers State Judicial Service Commission refuted the claims of George in a statement signed by its Acting Secretary, Blessing Vic-Jumbo, clarifying that George was compulsorily retired in February 10, 2025 for truancy. The statement said the decision was necessitated by George’s absence from work without leave from August 25, 2023 to December 2024.

    Ibas is, however, not weathering Rivers storm without support. Other women and stakeholders, who are in the same political family with Wike and the suspended lawmakers had also held demonstrations to drum support for him and to ask the president not to reinstate Fubara.

    Ibas has been flaying the allegations that he was favouring the camp of Wike in his decisions and appointments. But he vehemently denied the accusations saying he remain impartial in his dealings.

    Ibas said: “It is important to restate my impartial stand on the political crisis that has plagued out State. I remain committed to upholding the law and ensuring that all individuals, irrespective of their political affiliations, have a voice in the future of Rivers State. My administration will continue to focus on the collective good of our people.”

    There is no doubt that lack of democratic governance has had a toll on Rivers especially in the aspects of social and economic interactions. Recently, the Nigeria Bar Association (NBA) cited the development in Rivers as the reason why it relocated its 2025 National Convention to Enugu despite receiving whooping N300m from Rivers government for the event. While Ibas vowed to recover the money, NBA insisted it would not bulge in its decision and went ahead to list infractions of Ibas.

    The NBA in its statement delivered a worrisome verdict against Ibas when it said: “Rather than the peace-building efforts that was promised by the President, tension has steadily escalated in Rivers State, arbitrariness and impunity have been displayed on a daily basis and democratic institutions have been demobilized in a gestapo, military style.

    “Political appointments are being made by the Sole Administrator, Vice-Admiral Ibok Ete-Ibas with military fiat, without approval being sought from the National Assembly or any known legal institution for that matter.”

    But many commentators said until NBA returns the N300m it collected from Rivers, it lacked the moral right to hold such opinion against Ibas administration.

    Though Ibas denied all allegations against him by NBA, stakeholders believe that the emergency rule has reversed the development trend of Rivers. It has stagnated most of the ongoing projects especially those ones hitherto funded by the nullified budgets.

    But recent grapevine reports that Fubara had taken steps to initiate reconciliation by holding separate meetings with his estranged benefactor, Wike and President Tinubu was described by stakeholders as heartwarming.

    Little wonder some stakeholders are demanding reversal of the emergency rule and appealing to Fubara to deepen the reconciliation process and to stop his supporters from engaging in actions including protests capable of truncating the peaceful resolution of the crisis.

    A former Bayelsa State Labour Party (LP) Governorship Candidate, Engr. Udengs Eradiri, has told Fubara to shut his doors against crisis merchants and step up the ongoing reconciliation. Eradiri commended Fubara for heeding his earlier advice that he should kneel before his estranged benefactor and predecessor, Nyesom Wike and beg him for forgiveness.

    The former President, Ijaw Youths Council (IYC) Worldwide, recalled that when he advised Fubara to beg Wike for forgiveness some Ijaw leaders opposed his position, but said he was glad the suspended governor saw the wisdom in it. Eradiri, a former Commissioner for Youths and later Environment in Bayelsa, said amid the ongoing reconciliation Fubara must learn to keep enemies of Rivers that once surrounded him in abeyance.

    He classified those, who tried to make an ethnic case out of the crisis and others, who choreographed most political mistakes of Fubara and supervised some of his constitutional breaches without guiding him properly as the enemies of Rivers and Fubara. He said most of the people, who claimed to love the governor and offered him pieces of advice, were his real enemies because according to him they were profiting from the crisis and would not want it to end.

    He urged the suspended governor to reestablish his relationship with Wike and heed the directives of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in the process of finding lasting political calm in Rivers. He said if Fubara had been allowed by crisis merchants to implement the earlier peace agreement crafted by President Tinubu, whom he described as an old political warhorse, he would have avoided the political turmoil that almost led to his impeachment.

    Addressing Fubara, he said: “Thank God that President Tinubu saved you through the declaration of emergency rule. This opportunity has offered you a second chance, please do not bungle it.

    “I was happy that you heeded my advice, got up from your comfort zone and initiated the reconciliation by first meeting with Chief Wike and apologizing to him. You have done well. But you need to follow-up this process.

    Read Also: Top five smart phone brands Nigerians bought in Q1 2025

    “First, make yourself unreachable to those, who will come and slow this process down and feed you with unsolicited advice to abort this reconciliation”.

    Eradiri appealed to the governor to rein in his supporters and stop them from actions capable of derailing the reconciliation process. He particularly condemned the decision of some pro-Fubara women to walk out on an empowerment programme of the Renewed Hope Initiative (RHI) of the First Lady Senator Remi Tinubu under the guise that Dr. Theresa Ibas, the wife of the Rivers Sole Administrator represented Mrs. Tinubu.

    He said: “Such action is condemnable in the reconciliation process. It can derail and slow down the process of peace in the state as well as casting doubts on the suspended governor’s sincerity to end the political crisis in the state.

    “The suspended Governor must rein in his supporters and stop them from all forms of protest capable of deepening the political discord in the state. He must be seen to walk his talk because every action of his supporters will be attributed to him.”

    Eradiri appealed to Wike, suspended members of the House of Assembly and other stakeholders in the Minister’s camp to forgive Fubara and help him facilitate the process of reconciliation.

    Also, the National President, Movement for the Survival of Izon Ethnic Nationalities in the Niger Delta (MOSIEND), Amb. Kennedy Tonjo-West, urged the suspended governor to demonstrate leadership by guiding his followers to understand the importance of the ongoing reconciliation.

    While commending Fubara for meeting with Wike, he said his efforts might be in futility of his supporters continued to exhibit actions inimical to the peace process. West appealed to the governor ensure his supporters were on the same page with him and stop them from undertaking provocative actions.

    He said: “I will ask the suspended governor to demonstrate leadership by guiding his followers and ensuring that they understand the importance  of the peaceful reconciliation and that they are on the same page with him.

    “He should clearly communicate such actions and intentions to his followers and the public. They should engage in direct dialogue with the minister to resolve their differences.

    “The followers of the governor should avoid embarking on actions that could be perceived as provocative or disruptive to the reconciliation process. They should support the peaceful resolution of the crisis.

    “Both sides must compromise to resolve all the crisis. The governor should not be frantically trying to reconcile with the minister but behind him his followers are doing another thing. It will only create lack of trust and confidence in the process.”

    With the clamour to speed up reconciliation, Ibas will always be on crossroads and will never win the supper of majority of Rivers people no matter what he does to assuage them. Therefore, as the country and different states gear up to mark yet another May 29, Rivers Ibas remains sombre and sober wishing for the reinstatement of the government they voted for.

  • Rivers emergency suit: PDP govs yet to serve FG — AGF

    Rivers emergency suit: PDP govs yet to serve FG — AGF

    • Why I appointed LGA administrators, by Ibas

    • Women protest, demand reinstatement of Fubara

    • NBA moves conference from Port Harcourt to Enugu in protest

    The office of the Attorney General of the Federation (OAGF) and the Federal Government may not yet have been served summons on the suit filed by 11 governors of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) challenging President Bola Tinubu’s suspension of Rivers State Governor Siminilayi Fubara, according to indications yesterday.

    Also being challenged by the PDP governors is the President’s declaration of a state of emergency rule in Rivers.

    The AGF and the FG are listed as defendants in the suit, However, sources at the OAGF told The Nation yesterday that the summons were yet to be received by the supposed defendants.

    This, sources said, had not enabled the defendants to respond to the issues raised in the suit.

    Vice-Admiral Ibok Ibas (rtd), the Sole Administrator appointed by President Tinubu to run the state’s affairs in the absence of Fubara, yesterday explained that his decision to appoint administrators for the 23 local government areas in the state came from his findings when he visited some of the councils.

    Also yesterday, hundreds of women in the state took to the streets of Port Harcourt, the state capital, demanding a reversal of the emergency rule in the state.

    The aggrieved women marched along the popular Aba Road from Isaac Boro Park to Garrison Junction, displaying placards and chanting solidarity songs.

    A senior official in the office of the AGF said of the PDP governors’ suit: “We have read about the suit in the media.

    “You in the media are the one telling us that a suit has been filed by some PDP controlled states against the emergency rule declared in Rivers State.

    “For now, I can confirm to you that the office of the AGF has not been served. I believe it is this office that will also be served with processes intended for the Federal Government or the President.

     “We are waiting. This is our office. If indeed any suit has been filed, we will respond accordingly once we are served as required.”

    In the suit, marked SC/CV/329/2025, the Attorneys- General of Adamawa, Enugu, Osun, Oyo, Bauchi, Akwa Ibom, Plateau, Delta, Taraba, Zamfara, and Bayelsa states are asking the Supreme Court to determine if the President has power to suspend a democratically elected structure of a state.

    They also want the apex court to determine if the way and manner the President pronounced the state of emergency declaration in Rivers State was not in contravention of the 1999 Constitution.

    Read Also; Alayo Melody Singer: From street to gospel stage

    Specifically, the plaintiffs are praying the court to determine the following: “Whether upon a proper construction and interpretation of the provisions of Sections 1(2), 5(2), 176, 180, 188 and 305 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria can lawfully suspend or in any manner whatsoever interfere with the offices of a Governor and the Deputy Governor of any of the component 36 States of the Federation of Nigeria and replace same with his own unelected nominee as a Sole Administrator, under the guise of, or pursuant to, a Proclamation of a State of Emergency in any of the State of the Federation, particularly in any of the Plaintiffs States?

    “Whether upon a proper construction and interpretation of the provisions of Sections 1(2), 4(6), 11(4) & (5), 90, 105 and 305 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria can lawfully suspend the House of Assembly of any of the component 36 States of the Federation of Nigeria, under the guise of, or pursuant to, a Proclamation of a State of Emergency in any of such States, particularly in any of the Plaintiffs States?

    “Whether the consequent threat by the first Defendant acting on behalf of the President to the States of the Federation, including the Plaintiffs’ States, to the effect that the offices of the Governor and Deputy Governor of the States can be suspended by the President by virtue of a Proclamation of a State of Emergency, is not in contravention of the provisions of Sections 1(2), 4(6), 5(2), 11(2) and (3) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 and inconsistent with the principles of constitutional federalism?”

    Why I appointed LGA administrators, by Ibas

    Vice-Admiral Ibas at a meeting yesterday with the 23 local government administrators in Port Harcourt said that he realised that he needed people to help him at the grassroots to enable him actualise the mandate given him by President Tinubu.

    He advised the LG administrators to work within the principles of accountability, transparency and sense of service to help them build trust and promote sustainable development.

    Ibas told them to focus on issues of sanitation, environmental management, primary healthcare, welfare and discipline of local government civil servants, primary education, and youth engagement.

     He said such areas would form the basis of assessing their performances in the coming weeks.

     He said: “Since resuming this assignment, I have taken time to visit a few local government areas.

    “Those visits have afforded me the opportunity to interact with local government civil servants, and it was clear that I needed help with administering the entire state after the emergency proclamation areas which I am responsible for following from Mr. President’s proclamation.

    “And So, I went about trying to identify few individuals from which in the 7th April 2025, I selected those seated here today as administrators of the 23 Local Government Areas.

    “I expect you all to recognise this moment in history and rise to the occasion as impartial leaders that will help me deliver on the mandate given to me by Mr President to restore peace and stability and work towards returning all democratic institutions in the state.

    “Your selection to the important office is not by chance but a recognition of your capacity to lead, your commitment to service and the trust reposed in you to bring governance closer to the people.

    “Therefore, you bear the sacred responsibility, a duty to ensure that affairs of your respect councils are managed with the utmost care, respect, and unwavering dedication to the welfare of our people.”

    His administration, he said, would not tolerate any form of recklessness, abuse office or misuse of public funds or trust.

    He declared that resources allocated to the LGs must be used strictly for the purposes intended.

    Women march in Rivers, demand reversal of emergency rule

    The protesters came out under the auspices of Women Unite Prayer Group led by Dr. Nancy Chidi Nwankwo, Tamunobelema D. West and Cynthia Amadi.

    They told Tinubu to restore the democratically elected Governor.

    They said: “Women of Rivers, gathered for justice and democracy, and express total rejection of the state of emergency declared over our beloved state.

    “This imposition is not driven by any genuine threat to national security but clearly a politically motivated maneuver aimed at subjugating our people and undermining our democracy.

     “The overreach of the Sole Administrator, Vice-Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (rtd), is glaring indicator of the political conquest. His actions, which go far beyond the limited powers of a placeholder, betray the impartiality expected of his office and reveal the real intention behind this emergency rule.”

    The protesters said it was confounding that the federal authorities in Abuja would choose to descend with full weight of force on Rivers State, deploying a sledgehammer to kill a fly while ignoring the dire security emergencies ravaging states such as Borno, Yobe, Zamfara, Kaduna, Plateau, and Benue.

    They said:  “In these states, terrorists have overrun entire communities, taken control of local governments, and brutally murdered thousands of innocent citizens. Yet, no such declaration of emergency has been made.

    “If the National Assembly’s intention was truly to prevent breakdown of law and order in Rivers, a state that has remained relatively peaceful and has recorded no fatal incident, why has it failed to take even more decisive action in states where chaos and bloodshed are daily occurrences?

    “The unconstitutional and provocative actions of the Sole Administrator further expose the underlying political agenda at play. What we are witnessing is not governance. It is occupation. Not democracy, but autocracy.

    “Rivers people, especially women, are outraged by what is fast becoming a dual system of laws in Nigeria, one for other states, and another, unjust and repressive, for Rivers. We reject this blatant political invasion and the imposition of emergency rule in its entirety.”

    NBA moves annual conference from P’Harcourt

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), which was scheduled to hold its 2025 Annual General Conference (AGC) in Port Harcourt, yesterday announced that it had shifted it to Enugu in protest against what it called constitutional violations in Rivers.

    The NBA had described Fubara’s suspension as illegal and a “dangerous affront” to the country’s democracy.

    The association said in a statement that although its members were enthusiastic about hosting the AGC in Port Harcourt, the political climate in Rivers State changed soon after the imposition of the state of emergency.

    It decried the “command-style approach” of the Sole Administrator “that disregards constitutional provisions, court decisions, and pending litigation.”

    The NBA added: “His actions have undermined democratic institutions and processes, flouting the rule of law with impunity. Though clad in civilian attire, he governs as though the state is under military rule.

    “The voices of our members, particularly those calling for a change of venue, grew stronger over time.

    “We convened meetings with the Chairmen of NBA branches in Rivers State and held an emergency session of the National Executive Council (NEC) on the 27th of March, 2025.

    “The overwhelming consensus was that the NBA could not, in good conscience, proceed with the AGC in a state governed unconstitutionally by a Sole Administrator.

    “Given these undemocratic developments, Port Harcourt can no longer be considered a justifiable venue for the 2025 AGC. To hold our flagship event in such circumstances would amount to a tacit endorsement of constitutional violations and subversion of the rule of law.

    “The NBA has taken a principled position in accordance with the law: the appointment of a Sole Administrator in Rivers State is unconstitutional.

    “Consequently, and in alignment with the overwhelming position of NEC and the broader membership, we are compelled to relocate the 2025 AGC to a state where constitutional democracy remains intact.

    “We are pleased to announce that the 2025 Annual General Conference will now be held in the historic Coal City of Enugu. The city possesses the infrastructure and capacity to host a conference of our scale and significance.

    “We are confident that, with concerted efforts, this change of venue will not compromise our commitment to delivering a successful and impactful Conference.

    “We call on all members and stakeholders to lend their full support as we embark on this new path. With unity, diligence and a shared commitment to our values, we will make this transition a resounding success.”

  • Rivers Emergency: Those criticising Tinubu must think the constitution is dumb or an ass

    Rivers Emergency: Those criticising Tinubu must think the constitution is dumb or an ass

    Isn’t the concept that law is made for man, and not man for the law a central theme in some interpretations of the Bible, especially in the context of the teachings of Jesus  and the relationship between the Law and humanity?  Didnt Jesus emphasise that the Sabbath, and by extension, the Law, exists to serve humanity’s well-being, and should neither be a burden”, nor a legalistic control over them?

    Flowing from the above, shouldn’t the declaration of a state of emergency, no matter where, be consequential, that is, be towards the good of the state and, indeed, isn’t the raison detre of the emergency declaration in Rivers State to bring peace to a state already declared by the Supreme Court as having no government, even as governor Sir Amaopusenibo Siminalayi Fubara sat pretty in government House?

    Why then, in the face of the above, the hullabaloo by all manner of TV lawyers and some loud TV anchors?

    With due respect to the high and mighty – for some are truly distinguished – who had and, in fact, continue, to flagellate the President for suspending Rivers state governor Fubara and the state’s House of Assembly – one  has actually called for his impeachment – I can consider my job  done on the above topic after I would have quoted the opening portion of Sam Omatseye’s last week column which he captioned:”It’s All Noise”.

    He wrote:”So, they say the president could declare a state of emergency but leave the house members and the governor intact. What does that mean? It means rolling tanks and stamping jackboots on the streets of Port Harcourt. But the house members could go ahead and impeach Governor Sim Fubara?

    But wait! These are the same people that say the house members should not impeach him, and that it would be an act of bad faith and a call to turmoil. What turmoil? Blowing up pipelines and blowing up houses, putting lives of political enemies and innocent civilians in peril. So, the president should send Nuhu Ribadu and his team to look out for those who want to turn the state over to the devil? Meanwhile, those in office still retain the resources and capacity for turbulence?

    It is quite unfortunate that it is reason that is upside down. The state of emergency is to stave off violence, but what if the violence will remain a clear and present omen so long as those who would foment (it) are in their ferment because they have the power and pocket?

    Those who say this and call for constitutionalism were the same persons who prodded Fubara against the law. Against the same constitution, he set up a four-man legislature. They were the same television lawyers and commentators who kept mum when he blew up a legislative monument by way of the House of Assembly building. He also, against the constitution, passed a budget with four men. Also, against the constitution, he defied court order and organized a local government election.

    The same persons, against the constitution, are saying the Supreme Court erred by maintaining that Fubara defied the constitution. If the top court ruled otherwise, then he  would have acted like Obasanjo when he asked a dawn cabal of about six men to impeach a governor. It was the same PDP that did it and hailed it at that time. Obi said nothing then. Atiku was in PDP then. They did not stand up to their guy”.

    Hasn’t Omatseye said it all or can Fubara burn a common police station today and go scotfree?

    Yet constitution, constitution they bellowed, hardly letting us hear word.

    And they have their TV station where they congregate every morning – lawyers, aspiring lawyers, not so brilliant public analysts etc, spewing inananities, whilst the anchors pretend to permanently lecture the rest of us, eagerly showing off their erudition.

    So we ask: what is the essence of a  constitution if not to cohere the country and ensure peace and stability?

    Are all those who shout the primacy of the constitution, while correct, saying that President Tinubu should have slept off on duty, wait till the obdurate Fubara was impeached, as the House of Assembly was unerringly going to do, and see the entire Rivers state, complete with oil wells, and infrastructure, upon which the nation relies for sustenance, go up in flame?

    Is that really what they wanted the President to do?

    So the Obi’s and the Atiku’s of this world could gloat?

    Then they probably dont know Bola Ahmd Tinubu at all.

    It would have been funny, if not pathetic, that some otherwise respected individuals could be drawing a correlation between the emergency President Goodluck Jonathan declared in 1913 after a series of deadly attacks by Islamist militant groups, asking that the military should take “all necessary action to put an end to the impunity of insurgents and terrorists” in Borno, Adamawa, and Yobe and what the President just did.

    While the case in those three Northern states rested squarely on the menace of Boko Haram which was fast uprooting elected governments and the concerned state governors who needed nothing but help, in Rivers state the malady has gone past its politicians and was beginning to consume its elders most of who enthusiastically misdirected the governor.

    BTW, I have said to myself that this is pay back time for Rivers state as the crisis has broken the umbilical cord which  tied together those who, a few years back, turned Port Harcourt to the capital of judicial merchandising in Nigeria. Many of the victims of that era are still suffering the consequences of their  unexpected losses in the courts, whilst those expected to lose went back home celebrating.

    When critics hold that the emergency is okay but not the suspensions what exactly are they saying?

    That the Emergency declaration should be a mere formality – a damp squib?

    That Fubara and the House speaker should have continued to hold court, in their respective corner, when oil pipe lines are erupting in flames and human blood welling up in the creeks and everywhere on the streets of Rivers state?

    And they expect Tinubu to sit pretty in Aso Villa?

    No wonder some say the law is an ass, but not for this President.

    If the constitution will have to be stretched to its  elastic limit, so be it as long as the end in view is to save lives and property.

    What exactly would governor Fubara have been doing, on a daily basis, when other peoples’ husbands, wives , fathers and mothers, that is, our already overstretched soldiers – are out there, facing fire?

    Can we think for once?

    Of course had there been chaos, tv anchors would have remained there in their elegant suits,   telling us what Tinubu should have done; the exact same thing he did to save both lives, and the Nigerian economy, but for which those who speak English better than the owners of the language, are now recommending his impeachment.

    So who today are the “insurgents and terrorists” in Rivers state other than the suspended institutions against whom Tinubu would declare action?

    Can he sleep easy if those institutions are still able to continue their obduracy and further ensure that the state was without an effective government?

    It’s time some people  come to appreciate what gargantuan destruction President Tinubu saved the country from – the sheer bloodletting in a region known to be prone to unrestrained blood letting.

    Add to that the amount of oil   infrastructure which could have been blown off by some retired “local terrorists’ who were already braying for action. And didn’t governor Fubara, in one of his giddy moments, surrounded by hundreds, if not thousands, of Rivers youths, literally declared himself their commander of operations when he told them to go and await orders? What could he not have done if the President had waited for him to be impeached?

    In my view, if any Federal organ of government deserves any blame, it is none other than our successive body of lazy legislators for whom it has been impossible to see that the relevant portion of the  constitution is inchoate, needing an amendment.

    Finally, who and who had been the lead protagonists in the unremitting attack on the President?

    As usual Atiku, Obi and their joint godfather have, as usual, thought their attacks on Tinubu could bring back the presidential jewel they ignominiously lost in ’23, and so have never relented from their odious, childish practice of  taking every opportunity to lampoon him to their hearts’ content.

    I won’t blame most lawyers, especially those not showing off on television stations, seeing them more as strict constructionists of the constitution.

    It is, however, surprising, that many couldn’t bring their knowledge of Logic to bare on the matter.

    If the declaration itself constituted the premise, where then is the conclusion without which it will all amount to nothing and the President would have merely being wasting his time.

    But if most lawyers   acted ‘uberima fidei’, certainly not so Afam Osigwe, SAN, the NBA President, who emerged the “comrade Joe Ajaero” of the entire event the way he coyly sought to call people, not just his fellow lawyers, but Nigerians, out on a mass rising.

    Hear the ‘Labour leader’:”At this inauspicious moment in our nation’s trajectory, all people of goodwill and conscience should rise to oppose this audacious violation of our constitution and rape of our democracy”.

    “Mr. President must be made to know and understand in unmistakable terms that this illegality cannot stand”. He then concluded by “asking politicians across Nigeria to speak up and rise against the country’s descent into totalitarianism.”

    When you read that and note that the lead critics are the Obi’s, and the Pat Utomi’s, then you know that the thunderous shellacking of 2023 still rankles in some quarters.

    But sorry, we can’t help them.

    My advice, therefore, would be that rather than this their sterile and unproductive preoccupation, they should simply join veteran Alhaji Atiku Abubakar as he, again, begins to put together his ‘Association of the Aggrieved’, ahead of 2027.

  • Rivers emergency declaration: Okpebholo faults Jonathan

    Rivers emergency declaration: Okpebholo faults Jonathan

    • Decision proactive, necessary, says governor, minister
    • Fubara at church service

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State got more backing at the weekend.

    Edo State Governor Monday Okpebholo lashed out at former President Goodluck Jonathan for criticising the presidential action.

    Information and National Orientation Minister Mohammed Idris defended the “painful but responsible” action.

    Presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga said a Rivers State without the emergency declaration, given the way things were going, could be better imagined.

    Dr. Jonathan, speaking at the weekend, described the emergency declaration in Rivers as an abuse of power.

    He went ahead to blame everybody, saying: “The executive, legislature and the judiciary know the correct thing to do but they are refusing to do it.”

    Okpebholo, speaking during the kick-off of the 125-kilometre Benin-Auchi road yesterday, described ex-President Jonathan as not decisive when he was President, hence, his criticism of the proactive step by President Tinubu.

    He said the declaration of emergency had saved Nigeria’s economy.

    The governor said: “The man criticising President Tinubu did not take a similar step when he heard that they were going to kidnap the Chibok girls in 2014. It is better for a President to be proactive. The single decision taken by President Tinubu saved the economy of Nigeria.”

    The Edo Governor added: “What President Tinubu did in Rivers State is a welcome development, to ensure peace in the Niger Delta.

    “The decision he took to declare a state of emergency in Rivers State is in the best interest of Nigerians.

    “When crude oil pipelines in Rivers State were being blown by militants, what did Nigerians expect Mr. President to do on the nation’s economic sustenance?”

    Continuing, Okpebholo said: “When Jonathan was Nigeria’s President, the country’s total annual budget was not more than N1.6 trillion, but the N1.6 trillion is what we are sharing monthly (from the Federation Account) in this nation today. That is a man that has vision.”

    It was the second time in five days that Okpebholo would back the presidential action.

    On Thursday, he dissociated himself from the criticism of the presidential action by the Southsouth Governors Caucus.

    He thanked the President for the ongoing Federal road projects in the state, adding that when Dr. Jonathan, a son of the Niger Delta, was President, Edo was not remembered.

    Minister defends Tinubu

    Idris told The Nation last night that: “The president has no intention whatsoever to take over the governance of Rivers State. He has no intention to appoint a governor for Rivers State.

    “Rivers belongs to the people of the state. Just like all the other states of the federation have their governors and are functioning, the President also wants Rivers to function effectively.”

    The minister explained that President Tinubu took a “very responsible but very painful decision” as governance in the state had collapsed.

    Read Also: IG warns against unlawful detention

    He explained that the House of Assembly was non-functional, while the executive branch was facing serious difficulties.

    “The way democracy is designed is that the three arms of government must work together, and one will be checking the other.

    “So, we cannot have just the executive functioning and say we have a functional democracy.

    “We didn’t have that, and therefore, the president had to act,” he said.

    Idris stressed that President Tinubu relied on constitutional provisions to exercise his powers, emphasising that the situation had reached a critical point that necessitated urgent intervention.

    “Those who designed our constitution envisaged that this kind of situation could arise, and that was why they made the provision for it.

    “The President relied on the constitution to exercise his powers and take action,” he stated.

    According to him, the President acted in the best interest of Rivers people to prevent further descent into chaos and violence.

    “It would have been irresponsible for the president to allow the slide into violence that we were seeing in Rivers State.

    “At what point would he have intervened? The president had to responsibly step in to ensure that law and order, and governance, were restored in the interest of the people of Rivers State.”

    The minister assured that the President will not keep the emergency rule in place longer than necessary.

    “As soon as he assesses that sanity has returned to Rivers State, he will ensure the restoration of all democratic structures,” Idris assured.

    ‘Imagine Rivers State without emergency’

    Onanuga, in an article on the Presidential declaration, wondered what Rivers would have become had President Tinubu hesitated to declare a state of emergency.

    The political standoff between the State Assembly and Governor Siminalayi Fubara could have continued and degenerated into violence, he said.

    Impeachment threats, he said, might have spurred attacks on lawmakers by the governor’s supporters, while militants in the creeks—primed to sabotage critical oil infrastructure—could have plunged Nigeria’s oil production back to pre-2023 lows.

    Onanuga said sensational reporting of the crisis and opportunistic litigation would have inflamed tensions further, paralysing governance and risking lives.

    “Schools and hospitals would shutter; investors would flee. We can only imagine the human and economic toll.

    “Today, thanks to the president’s intervention, Rivers State can breathe again.

    “Political tensions have eased, banal headlines have quietened, and stakeholders—encouraged by the newly-appointed administrator—are charting a path to lasting peace.

    “Critics who argue the crisis ‘did not yet warrant’ emergency rule ignore a stark truth: waiting for the breakdown of law and order to escalate into anarchy before acting is like withholding firefighters until a house burns to ashes.

    “A responsible leader like President Tinubu, who swore an oath to protect the constitution and corporate existence of the country, cannot fail to act when a constituent part of the Federation is careering towards the precipice.”

    Fubara makes first public appearance after suspension

    Suspended Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, made his first public appearance after he was temporarily swept out of power.

    Fubara attended a Church Service at the Salvation Ministry, in Port Harcourt dousing speculations surrounding his whereabouts.

    Fubara, who moved out of the Government House on Wednesday and had not been seen since then, showed up at the Salvation Ministry and was received by a senior pastor, who led him into the church to join the service.

    He was driven into the church premises on a minimal convoy with no flag and no official seal of the governor’s office.

    A statement by his Chief Press Secretary (CPS), Nelson Chukwudi, confirmed that Fubara attended a special prayer, worship and thanksgiving service.

    The statement said the governor was accompanied by top politicians, major stakeholders, elders and leaders of the State, and associates to express gratitude to God for His love, mercy and unwavering support amid the festering political challenges.

    Those who accompanied the governor are the President-General of Ohanaeze Ndigbo Worldwide, Senator John Azuta Mbata; former Deputy National Chairman of the PDP, Dr Sam Sam Jaja, Chief Orits Onyiri, Chief Mike Elechi and Chief David Briggs.

    Others are Dr Tamunosisi Gogo-Jaja, Amaopusenibo Fubara Hart, Chief Theodore Georgewill, Hon Kingston Sylvanus, former Mayor of Port Harcourt City,  ]Ezebunwo Ichemati; former Ikwerre Local Government Council Chairman, Israel Abosi; former Emohua Local Government Council Chairman, Chief David Omereji; among others.

    “The church service, a testament to his deep faith and belief in God as the ultimate dispenser of justice, was an extraordinary session of worship, prayers, and thanksgiving, to appreciate the Lord and acknowledge His never-failing gifts to humanity,” the statement said.

    The service was led by the Presiding Pastor of the church, David Ibiyeomie and featured soul-lifting songs, scriptural exhortations, and prayers for continued peace, progress, and prosperity in Rivers State.

    A special prayer session was also held for the governor shortly after the service.

    Fubara, however, did not speak in church or with reporters after the service.

  • Why governors’ forum is silent on Rivers emergency, by DG

    Why governors’ forum is silent on Rivers emergency, by DG

    • Tinubu not overbearing, acted in national interest – Presidency

    • Ibas vows to complete reconstruction of House of Assembly

    • House of Reps says bribery allegation pure fiction

    • More kudos, knocks for Tinubu’s emergency declaration

    The Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) yesterday attributed its neutral position on the recent declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State to the need to steer clear of taking positions that may alienate members with varying political interests.

    Taking positions on contentious partisan issues, the NGF said, would not augur well for it, especially in view of its past experience in fundamental division.

    Notwithstanding, the declaration of the state of emergency by President Bola Tinubu yesterday generated more kudos and knocks from across the country.

    Special Adviser to the President on Senate Matters, Senator Basheer Lado, said the action of the president was meant to ensure protection of lives and restoration of law and order in the state, while the President’s Special Adviser on Media and Public Communications, Sunday Dare, said his principal  was required  to “avert needless harm and destruction .”

    National Publicity Secretary of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Felix Morka, said Tinubu, by his action, cleared what had manifested as a constitutional crisis in Rivers state.

    But former President Goodluck Jonathan saw it from a different perspective.

    He described “abuse of office and power by the three arms of government in the country“ as a dent on Nigeria’s image.

    The NGF, in a statement by its Director General Abdulateef Shittu, said it is essentially “an umbrella body for sub-national governments to promote unified policy positions and collaborate with relevant stakeholders in pursuit of sustainable socio-economic growth and the well-being of the people.”

    It added: “As a technical and policy hub comprising governors elected on different platforms, the body elects to steer clear of taking positions that may alienate members with varying political interests.

    “In whatever language it is written, taking positions on contentious partisan issues would mean a poor sense of history — just a few years after the forum survived a fundamental division following political differences among its members.

    “Regardless, the Forum is reputed for its bold positions on governance and general policy matters of profound consequences, such as wages, taxes, education and universal healthcare, among others.”

    It asked for “the understanding of the public and the media, confident that appropriate platforms and crisis management mechanisms would take care of any such issues.”

    State of emergency meant to protect lives, ensure order, says Lado

    Senator Lado said the President’s initiative on the Rivers State crisis was “driven by the highest commitment to preserving lives, restoring order and protecting the democratic integrity of our nation.”

    He said the timely intervention has reinforced the President’s unwavering resolve to prioritise the security and stability of all Nigerians, regardless of political or ethnic affiliations.

    Read Also: Why NGF is silent on Rivers crisis, by DG Shittu

    “To the Nigerian people, this action was not just necessary, it was imperative. When a state faces a situation where lawlessness threatens peace, governance and the safety of citizens, decisive measures must be taken.

    “The declaration of a state of emergency was not about politics but about protecting innocent lives, ensuring law and order, and preserving the economic and social fabric of Rivers State.

    “The Federal Government, through this action, has reassured Nigerians that no part of the country will be left to the forces of chaos and instability.”

    Tinubu not overbearing; he acted in the overriding national interest — Dare

    On his part, Sunday Dare said: “In times of harsh circumstance and imminent danger, a responsible and dedicated leader is forced into action to avert needless harm and destruction. This is true of the President of a nation, a general in the midst of battle or the community leader who lives next door.

    “We all know this as the true law of our political existence and of the human condition. Anyone who feigns ignorance of this fact does so not out of truth but in an attempt to foment further crisis.

    “In times of urgent emergency, emergency measures must be taken. If not, trouble turns into calamity. That which is bad becomes even worse and less amenable to solution.

    “In the case of Rivers State, turmoil and crisis had taken over. The rival stakeholders could not see their way toward resolution. Something had to be done before all became undone.

    “In this case, President Tinubu stepped up as was his moral and legal obligation to do. In this case, the Constitution, the blueprint of our democracy spells out the options before the President in dire and emergency circumstances.”

    He faulted criticism that the President over reached himself in imposing the state of emergency.

    His words: “The declaration of a state of emergency on Rivers State for six months is well within the stated powers of the President. This is settled by the very wording of the constitution itself and backed by judicial precedents.

    “Since the declaration was made, Nigerians have heard legal and political opinions and analyses of different shades. This discourse is healthy for our democracy but cannot substitute for the rule of law and the proper interpretation of our constitution.

    “The frenzy by opponents of the President has hit a high pitch. They have placed themselves in opposition to what the law says about the powers and authority of the President because they have previously placed themselves in political opposition to the President.

    “The powers conferred on the President in this instance and the will to use it when the situation warrants are the difference between an indecisive leader and a courageous, committed one.The Supreme Court understands this and is very careful in instances such as this.

    “According to Prof Kanyinsola Ajayi , we must recall what happened in 1962 in the case of FRA Williams and Majekodunmi on the removal of the Premier of the Western Region. 

    “Instructively, the Supreme Court said when it comes to matters of emergency, the courts are very cautious and reluctant to query what the President has done. They observed these are matters that are within the exclusive preserve of the President.

    “This is because issues of public safety, pubic order, national security and the aversion of calamity are not necessarily objective questions that the court can determine.

    “The Securitization theory posits that leaders must act when they perceive, recognise existential threat and during severe threat.

    “Securitization theory, developed by the Copenhagen School, posits that security is a social construct, not an objective reality. 

    “The securitization theory further posits that political issues are constituted as extreme security issues to be dealt with urgently when they have been labeled as ‘dangerous’, ‘menacing’, ‘threatening’, ‘alarming’ and so on by a ‘securitising actor’ who has the social and institutional power to move the issue ‘beyond politics’.

    “The deteriorating situation in Rivers State had become an existential threat to both democracy and national interest. The operative word here is ‘suspension’ not ‘removal’.  There is a six-month window for the return to normalcy.

    “It is in the light below that we must understand that the most appropriate, timely and constitutional option available to Mr. President was the declaration of a state of emergency. Tanimu Y. et al captures it perfectly and I concur:

    “President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s intervention in Rivers State must be understood—not as a political maneuver, but as a constitutional necessity to prevent the descent into anarchy. His actions, in invoking Section 305 of the Nigerian Constitution, affirm the fundamental role of the presidency: not as a bystander to disorder but as the ultimate custodian of constitutional integrity and national“

    Morka: Blame Fubara for Rivers constitutional crisis

    Speaking on Arise TV, Morka said the constitutional crisis that existed in Rivers State until the imposition of the state of emergency was clearly initiated by the now suspended Governor Siminilayi Fubara.

    “He (Fubara) not only demolished the assembly, he locked them (Rivers lawmakers) out,” Morka said.

    “He froze them in a package and cast them aside as though they didn’t exist; as though our constitution never intended to provide for a legislative body in Rivers State.

    “He completely froze their allowances; he froze their allocation and every penny flowing to the assembly.

    “Not only that, Governor Fubara slapped democracy in the face by anointing two, three people to be his legislature in preference to a democratically elected institution of the house of assembly in Rivers State.

    ”He proceeded to govern unconstitutionally, illegally and unlawfully for more than 14 months.”

    Morka denied that the President’s intervention created a constitutional crisis, saying that on the contrary, Tinubu’s move has stopped the rot.

    His words: “There was a constitutional crisis in Rivers State up until the declaration of the state of emergency.

     “And that constitutional crisis was initiated, authored and precipitated by the governor of Rivers State, Governor Fubara.”

    We must always do the right thing, says Jonathan

    Former President Jonathan said the three arms of government owed it a duty to “strive to do what is right.”

    He spoke as chairman of the annual colloquium organised by the Haske Satumari Foundation in Abuja, with the theme: “Promoting social change and development through diversity, equity and inclusion.”

    Jonathan said: “As a former President and also from the Niger Delta, when the issue of suspending the Governor of Rivers State came up, I think people called on me, President Jonathan and ex-President Obasanjo to say something.

    “People expected us to say something about what is happening. Of course, people don’t even know that traditionally all over the world, former presidents hardly make statements about what the current presidents are doing because of the tension it could create in the country.

    “In most cases, look at America, look at everywhere…So, for former presidents to make statements …and of course, what is happening in Nigeria today regarding the situation in Rivers State is like an Indian proverb that says that if somebody is sleeping, really sleeping, you can easily wake up that person.

    “But if that person is pretending to sleep, you find it difficult to wake up that person.

    “The key actors in Nigeria, from the executive to the legislature, judiciary and the Senate and others are here.

     “And the judiciary, they know the correct thing to do. But they are refusing to do it.

     “They are pretending to sleep, and waking such a person is extremely difficult because the person knows the right thing, a clear abuse of office and clear abuse of power cutting across from the three arms of government, from the executive to the parliament and the judiciary.

    “And I always plead with our people that whatever we do affects everybody, and sometimes we do things and we think that it doesn’t affect us.

    “Why is it that our passport is not valued that much? Why is it that Nigerians are not given the kind of treatment we’re supposed to receive at international airports?

    “Sometimes, we think it’s because of ‘yahoo’ boys or 419. Not only them. Yes, they are part of the problem, but whatever happens in the country, decisions that are taken by the executive arm of government, decisions that are taken by the parliament and judicial decisions affect everybody.

    “For example, no businessman can bring his money to invest in a country where the judiciary is compromised, where government functionaries can dictate to judges what judgment they will give.

    “No man brings his money to invest in that economy because we are taking a big risk. So whatever we do affects everybody, and if we want to build a nation where children are grandchildren will live, no matter how painful it is, we must strive to do what is right.

    “It may cost us, but we must end the…and pay the price to insist on doing what is right.

    “Whether you are holding an executive office as a president, a minister or a governor, or a civil servant, an executive, whether you are holding an office in the parliament, Senate or House of Representatives, whether you are a judicial officer at the High Courts or appellate courts, we must strive to do what is right if we want to build a nation that our children would be proud of.”

    Housing minister blasts Kwankwaso over position on Rivers

    Minister of State for Housing and Urban Development, Yusuf Abdullahi Ata, criticised the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) presidential candidate, Rabiu Kwankwaso, for faulting President Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State.

    Ata told Kwankwaso to keep his opinions to himself as the president’s decision was taken in the best interest of Rivers people and for national stability and security.

    The minister, in a statement signed by his Publicity Aide, Seyi Olorunsola, praised Tinubu for being proactive in addressing national issues while demonstrating that he is attuned to the concerns of Nigerians.

    “The declaration (state of emergency) was necessary in order to maintain law and order in Rivers State, which has been embroiled in prolonged political turmoil.

    “For the records, President Tinubu acted within the confines of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which grants him the authority to enforce emergency measures while ensuring proper legislative oversight within the stipulated time-frame.

    “Any state facing prolonged instability should take heed and address its internal issues.

    “Kwankwaso has a flawed understanding of law and governance. He should focus his energy on resolving the ongoing crisis within the Kano Emirate Council, which has been exacerbated by him through his political protégé – Governor Abba Yusuf.”

    The minister accused Kwankwaso of fostering a culture of political intimidation, particularly in his dealings with state lawmakers during his tenure as governor of Kano State.

    NPSA blames Fubara, Wike for Rivers crisis

    Political scientists, under the aegis of the Nigerian Political Science Association (NPSA), asked the suspended Rivers State Governor Fubara and Federal Capital Territory Minister Wike to tread the path of peace to avoid prolongation of emergency rule in the state.

    In a statement, NPSA’s National President Prof Hassan Saliu said the two men “are culpable and must be made to realise that their actions or inactions have brought about the emergency rule in the state.”

    The association called for “a thorough examination of the legal instruments behind the declaration to ensure its constitutionality, avoid administrative trials and respect the rights of all, especially law-abiding citizens, during the emergency rule; pursuit of diplomatic efforts to render an extension of the declaration unnecessary and restore constitutionality in Rivers State and recognition that political dominance has an expiry date.

    It also advocated prioritization of peace in Rivers State, as it is in the self-interest of all parties involved.

    Reps debunk allegations of $5,000 inducement to members over state of emergency in Rivers

    The Deputy Spokesman of House of Representatives, Hon Philip Agbese, has debunked allegations that each member was induced with $5,000 dollars to ratify President Tinubu’s request on the proclamations of a State of Emergency in Rivers State.

    Agbese told reporters in Abuja yesterday that the allegation was false, malicious and emanated from “the pit of hell.”

    He said the resolution of the House on the State of Emergency declaration in Rivers was done out of patriotism and in the interest of restoring lasting peace to River State.

    Agbese said: “The allegation that members of the House of Representatives were induced with $5,000 to pass a resolution is unfair to the Parliament. Very, very unfair to the parliament.

    “What we did on Thursday was to align ourselves with what I call the wisdom of King Solomon.” 

    “All insinuations that any individual was given money to give to members is nothing but lies from the pit of hell. The opposition should see the good things that we are doing day and night for the country.

    “At no point did members of the House engage in any financial inducement in relation to the state of emergency declaration.

    “The decision was taken after extensive deliberations on the security and political situation in Rivers State, in line with our constitutional responsibilities to safeguard national stability.

    “Any suggestion that lawmakers were bribed is pure fiction, designed to serve the interests of those who seek to distort facts and create unnecessary tension in the country.

    “The House of Representatives remains an independent institution guided by democratic principles, the rule of law and the collective will of the Nigerian people.

    “Our duty is to make decisions that align with the national interest, not to succumb to baseless distractions aimed at eroding public trust.

    “The allegations of bribery are a desperate attempt to discredit the House and must be dismissed as the political comedy that it is.”

    Third Republic HoR forum backs Tinubu’s intervention

    The Third Republic House of Representatives Members Forum expressed its full support for President Tinubu’s intervention in Rivers State, emphasising the necessity of his actions to restore stability.

    National Chairman of the Forum, Hon. Adzer Abya, commended the President and the National Assembly for their efforts to find a peaceful resolution to the turmoil that has persisted in the state since the beginning of the 10th Assembly.

    The President’s imposition of a State of Emergency in Rivers State, the Forum stated, was a strategic move to prevent further deterioration and ensure a fair resolution within the six-month period stipulated for the emergency rule.

    The Forum noted that neither the Governor, with only three active lawmakers in a 30-member House, nor the defected members, acting against constitutional provisions, could effectively govern, thereby creating a governance crisis.

    The Forum praised the President’s decision as a “bold and historic step” that prevented a situation akin to the Western Region crisis of the 1960s.

    Cross River govt backs emergency rule in Rivers, disowns South-South govs’ position

    Cross River State Acting Governor Peter Odey has disassociated himself from the statement said to have been issued by the Chairman of the South-South Governors’ Forum, opposing the state of emergency in Rivers State.

    Odey noted that he was neither consulted nor was his opinion sought before the issuance of the statement.

     “The position of the forum does not reflect the views of the Government of Cross River State, which fully aligns with the decision of Mr. President, taken in the best interest of national security, peace, and stability,” he said.

    “Every responsible government must prioritise the protection of lives and property, and where circumstances necessitate decisive action, such measures should be supported for the greater good of our democracy and national unity.

    “Cross River State remains committed to upholding constitutional governance and will continue to collaborate with the Federal Government in ensuring peace, security, and stability across the country.”

    Ibas vows to complete Rivers House of Assembly Complex project

    The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice-Admiral Ibok Ete Ekwe Ibas (rtd), yesterday inspected the State House of Assembly Complex now under construction.

    He pledged to get it completed before the expiration of his six-month tenure.

    Ibas advised the contractor handling the project to speed up work and deliver it as mutually agreed.

    He insisted that part of his mandate included restoring full and effective legislative activities in the state.

    The project was awarded to Monier Construction Company (MCC) Limited and work has advanced on the facility that has 34 offices on a two-storey building with an elevator, gallery, meeting rooms and conference hall.

    Ibas, who was accompanied by the Head of Rivers State Civil Service, Dr George Nwaeke, was conducted round the site by the General Manager of MCC, Engr Omaka Oko.

    The Sole Administrator explained that in the last two days of assumption of duties, he noticed a missing pillar in the state governance structure, and was determined to ensure that there was a place for effective legislative activities after six months.

    Ibas said: “I have been at the executive arm of the state governance structure and one of the pillars that is missing for now is the legislature and for them to function effectively, they also need a place to work from.

    “And perhaps, I am yet to be sure that work is going on as expected, so that by the end of the six months, this place will be ready for those who need to use it. I think basically that is what it is.”

    The former building was demolished by the suspended governor in the heat of his disagreement with the 27 state lawmakers on the side of FCT Minister Wike.

  • State of emergency: Tinubu acted fast to save Rivers, economy – Karimi

    State of emergency: Tinubu acted fast to save Rivers, economy – Karimi

    Chairman of the Senate Services Sunday Karimi has hailed President Bola Tinubu for the decision to declare a state of emergency in Rivers State. 

     He told reporters on Friday in Abuja that the President acted in the best interest of the State and Nigeria, having taken his decision in compliance with the Constitution.

    “No President or government worth a name, will fold its arms and watch a political situation deteriorate to what we saw unfolding in Rivers State.

    “We saw that bombing of pipelines had begun, and the security situation was getting worse with the tension everywhere”, Karimi stated.

    Karimi, who represents Kogi-West on the ticket of the All Progressives Congress (APC), recalled the “fatherly role” Tinubu had played in the crisis since 2023 in a bid to get the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, and suspended Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reach an understanding, to no avail.

    He explained: “We were all here in 2023 when Mr President called that truce meeting at the Aso Rock Villa. There was the eight-point agenda for settlement reached between the factions.

    “When Nigerians expected that progress should be made to achieve peace, things started deteriorating considerably to a point where the governor demolished the House of Assembly building and administered the state with only three legislators.”

    Karimi observed that with the recent judgment of the Supreme Court, which gave the upper hand to the 27 lawmakers loyal to the camp of the FCT Minister, matters merely got worse in the State as the lawmakers were set to impeach the Governor.

    “What did you expect would be the implications? There would have been more destruction, killings and economic losses for the country.

    “With the bombings that had already started, it was a matter of time before the whole state would be engulfed in flames. No responsible President would sit, arms folded, and allow that to happen “ he added. 

    Read Also: Rivers Emergency Rule: Temper justice with mercy, NNPP chieftain appeals to Tinubu

    The senator further argued that it took “painstaking efforts” by the administration to raise daily crude oil production to around 1,800 barrels, noting that Nigeria’s economy was already “witnessing a rebound under the renewed hope projects of the government.”

    “Allowing the situation in Rivers to get worse before he would act, wouldn’t have helped the state or Nigeria as a country in any way.

    “Mr. President intervened at the right time, and his actions are covered by law,” he said.

    Karimi also spoke on the emergency declaration  in Borno, Yobe, Adamawa and a couple of other states by former President Goodluck Jonathan without removing the Governors from office or suspending the state assemblies.

    According to him, the case with those States was not generated by political crises but rather security concerns.

    “So, I will advise those comparing the two scenarios to remember that one was purely about security threats resulting from the insurgency caused by Boko Haram, while that of Rivers is clearly political.

    “It was the proper thing to do to suspend the political actors in the two factions to allow for tensions to diffuse. Nigerians should appreciate the President for the action he has taken so far,” he stated.

    Sen. Karimi also noted that there was no cause for alarm as the National Assembly had indicated that the emergency rule could be reviewed as soon as there were signs that things could quickly normalise in Rivers State.

  • Makinde faults Rivers Emergency rule, PDP Govs head to court

    Makinde faults Rivers Emergency rule, PDP Govs head to court

    Oyo Governor Seyi Makinde has condemned the declaration of a State of Emergency in Rivers State.

    He also stated Governors elected under the platform of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) will be challenging the declaration in court. 

    According to Makinde, the decision to seek legal redress was taken at an emergency meeting of the PDP Governors on Wednesday. 

    He commended the PDP for demonstrating what he called “the needed strength and leadership”.

    President Bola Tinubu, on Tuesday, declared a state of emergency in Rivers State suspendinh Governor Similayi Fubara; his Deputy Ngozi Odu, as well as the House of Assembly for six months. 

    Read Also: Oyo APC stakeholders charges Makinde on disaster prevention, management

    The President appointed Vice Admiral Ibok Ibas (Rtd.) as Sole Administrator for the State.

    Governor Makinde, in his biweekly newsletter, The Business of Governance Issue 110, noted that the suspension of democracy in Rivers State, through the declaration of State of Emergency, is an illegal act which must be condemned by all well-meaning Nigerians. 

    According to him: “I stand today to say that the declaration of the State of Emergency in Rivers State and the suspension of the executive and legislative arms of government by the presidency is an illegality that right-thinking members of society must oppose.

    “Our democratic tenets must never be trifled with no matter our personal feelings and loyalties. This is the time to take a stand for fairness, equity and justice.

    “As our democracy grows and unfolds, we must also be willing to speak up when we see anything that threatens our development as a nation. We must choose to stand up for what is right, even if it means standing alone.”

    He added:  “I am glad that our great party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) is demonstrating the needed strength and leadership. 

    “Yesterday (Wednesday), the PDP Governors’ Forum rose from an emergency meeting where we unanimously decided to challenge the actions of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in a court of competent jurisdiction. We cannot fold our hands and watch the democracy we built for almost three decades be trampled upon.”

  • NADECA commends Akpabio, Abbas over NASS endorsement of Rivers emergency rule

    NADECA commends Akpabio, Abbas over NASS endorsement of Rivers emergency rule

    …says Tinubu’s action necessary to reset Rivers

    The National Democratic Coalition (NADECA), a coalition of over 100 pro-democracy groups in Africa, has commended Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Speaker of the House of Representatives Tajudeen Abbas for their leadership in securing the National Assembly’s endorsement of the state of emergency in Rivers State.

    In a statement signed on Thursday evening by Dr. Chukwuma Eze, President-General of NADECA, the coalition said it took 72 hours to critically assess the situation before arriving at its position, unlike other groups that rushed to conclusions. 

    NADECA described President Bola Tinubu’s decision as a necessary intervention to restore order and governance in Rivers State.

    The coalition insisted that without the emergency measures, the crisis in Rivers could have escalated beyond control, further threatening democratic stability in the country.

    NADECA also took a swipe at critics of the emergency rule, accusing them of politicising a matter of national security and governance.

    “After a thorough and objective review of the crisis in Rivers State, we are convinced that President Tinubu acted in the best interest of democracy and national stability. The state of emergency was not only justified but essential to reset the governance structure in Rivers and prevent a total breakdown of law and order,” the statement said.

    Read Also: APC applauds NASS over Rivers emergency rule, carpets Atiku, others

    “We commend Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Speaker Tajudeen Abbas for rising to the occasion and ensuring that the National Assembly played its constitutional role in endorsing this decisive action. Their leadership at this critical moment reassures Nigerians that our democracy remains strong.

    “It is unfortunate that some individuals and groups are deliberately twisting the narrative to suit their interests. The truth remains that Rivers State was on the brink of chaos, and it required urgent intervention. Those who claim to be defenders of democracy should ask themselves if democracy can thrive in an environment of lawlessness.”

    NADECA called on all stakeholders, including political leaders and civil society groups, to support efforts to stabilise Rivers State and ensure that governance is restored in a manner that benefits all residents.

    “Nigeria cannot afford to allow political crises to fester to the point where they threaten national security. The President has acted, the National Assembly has backed him, and now it is time for all well-meaning Nigerians to focus on ensuring that peace and development return to Rivers State,” NADECA stated.

    “We remain committed to defending democracy and the rule of law. We will continue to monitor developments in Rivers and across Nigeria to ensure that constitutional order is upheld.”

  • Rivers Emergency: NASS saved democracy, remains African pride – Obidike

    Rivers Emergency: NASS saved democracy, remains African pride – Obidike

    A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress Hon Obidike Chukwuebuka, has commended the National Assembly for approving President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s declaration of a State of Emergency in Rivers.

    He said the approval saved democracy and will help restore normalcy to the oil-rich State. 

    Speaking to newsmen in Abuja after a meeting at the National Assembly complex, Obidike emphasised the importance of the National Assembly’s role in maintaining democratic principles and upholding the rule of law. 

    He noted that the approval of the State of Emergency declaration demonstrated the lawmakers’ commitment to protecting the nation’s democracy and promoting peace and stability in the interest her people. 

    Read Also: BREAKING: Senate okays State of Emergency in Rivers State

    Obidike’s remarks come at a time when democratic institutions in Africa are facing significant challenges. 

    According to a report by International IDEA, the average level of democracy in Africa remains relatively stable, but there are concerns about the erosion of democratic norms and the rise of authoritarianism in some countries.

    He said: “The National Assembly’s approval of the state of emergency declaration is a significant affirmation of Nigeria’s commitment to democratic principles. The National Assembly has once again demonstrated its role as a guardian of democracy and a champion of the rule of law.”