Tag: Rivers

  • Rivers and President Jonathan’s blather

    Rivers and President Jonathan’s blather

    • By Bishir Dauda Sabuwar

    Sir: The reaction to the imposition of emergency rule on Rivers State by the former president, Goodluck Jonathan was characteristically unbecoming of an elder who was one time a president. The remark is pedestrian, lacking wisdom and circumspection.

    At this point in time, any wise statesman, if he had to speak about any issue, should say something that will add value. Incessant talks from elders can be counterproductive. Jonathan’s comment cannot inspire new thinking. It will not address any issue because it is not predicated in context, and he didn’t speak as a mediator. His blubbering is not different from the torrential partisan comments made by hundreds of ordinary people.

    Read Also: Top five countries offering best salaries, visa pathways for STEM professionals in 2025

    When Fubara, the ill-tempered suspended governor of Rivers State, bombed the building of the Rivers State House of Assembly, I waited to hear from Jonathan what he would say as an “elder statesman” only to be greeted with silence!

    Jonathan perhaps was perhaps AWOL when Fubara presented his budget to four people. It is a caricature of the whole system for a governor to present a budget to only four legislators. It is a disgrace to the country, but to Goodluck Jonathan, this illegality will not dent the image of Nigeria.

    Jonathan did not initiate reconciliation as a “man of peace.” He hid himself elsewhere. And even when Fubara spit fire that he would surprise those who underrate him, Jonathan did not comment.

    A pipeline was blown a day after an impeachment notice was served on Fubara; Jonathan was nowhere to be found.

    It was only after President Tinubu did the needful that Jonathan reacted. These are the kind of elders we have today in this country. This man even made spurious remarks against the judiciary just to earn undeserved applause from those who pushed him to make comments.

    The former president has the right to comment on any issue to his fancy, but for God’s sake, anytime he wants to dabble in any matter, he should not forget that he is an elder statesman.

    •Comrade Bishir Dauda Sabuwar,

     Unguwa Katsina.

  • Rivers: Between 1962 and 2025

    Rivers: Between 1962 and 2025

    With the Rivers emergency bind of March 18, a babble — excitable TV lawyers, baleful politicians, giddy rights activists and sundry grudgers — swear Rivers 2025 is same as Western Region 1962.  Not so!

    They probably pray — and fast too! — that Rivers brings the same crash as 1962! Fond hope!  But more on that presently. 

    Now, is the tale of two combatants that fought, without let, and ended in a ditch! 

    First, Nyesom Wike and his 27 legit legislators, that somewhat bottled a sure Fubara wallop into a pulsating — if tragic — draw, to borrow that dramatic football expression.

    What the hell were the Wike group thinking, after having the pitiful Siminalayi Fubara exactly where they wanted him?

    A double-whammy impeachment of governor and deputy!  That would have been the first in Nigerian history!  That was classic rush without gumption!

    Pray, what was Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu’s offence, beyond guilt by association?  Would she, the tail, have wagged the dog? A mere “spare tyre”, could she have stopped Fubara, with his penchant for executive suicide?

    Besides, impeached governor and deputy would have romped the legit Speaker, Martins Amaewhule, into office as acting governor — at least, pending fresh elections.

    Would the Fubara side, seething with defeat and grilling with humiliation, have folded their arms?

    Couldn’t the Wike side have struck the shepherd to scatter the flock? Targeting Fubara — with the odd chance of Odu becoming Rivers first female governor — would have split his camp, and forced not a few careening into their original Wike camp — careerists all! — just to retain their sinecure!  Or wouldn’t it?  Cynical!

    That double-whammy was a strategic blunder.  Fubara has lived to fight again.

    As for Fubara, no tears from here.  From his sundry fumbling as governor, he cuts a tragic gubernatorial figure — the most tragic so far?

    His infantile temper hardly trumps a local government councillor’s!  He hides behind a finger, as  he mounts a huge billboard beside his many infractions.  Most politicians cover theirs. Not Fubara!

    He’s in quite a class, all his own, in executive delinquency — or how would you place a governor, in a state in crisis, openly telling Ijaw “youths” to keep calm — euphemism for rearm? — and await “instructions”?  Next, a bang from oil pipes!

    Or an executive prodigal who would rush to demolish the Rivers House of Assembly — to fend off impeachment — only to scramble together N10 billion to build another one, and still pretends he he has any sense of value!

    If his Rivers electors don’t question his sense of value, that’s their democratic migraine. But again, Wike bears vicarious blame for giving Rivers such an immature fellow. 

    Read Also: I have no link to any militant group, says Fubara

    Why did Wike pick him, though?  To spin and juggle him like a yo-yo?  Rivers!

    Now, to the pseudo-historical parallel between Rivers and the old West.

    Rivers, as Western Region in 1962, is a coastal state.  Prime Minister Abubakar Tafawa-Balewa was friendly to Western Premier Samuel Ladoke Akintola (SLA), a key player in the dispute.  Also, President Bola Tinubu is friendly to Wike, his FCT minister, another critical player in the Rivers dispute, though he’s no foe of Fubara.

    Beyond these parallels, the two crises couldn’t have been more different.

    Between the Action Group (AG) faction of Chief Obafemi Awolowo and SLA’s renegade plank, there was enough equal-opportunity politics to go round — equal-opportunity cynicism to outfox each other. 

    But on the balance of facts, Balewa rigged the federal might to favour SLA and damn Awo.  Tinubu, from the beginning, brought the two together to iron out political peace.

    The Privy Council judged that SLA was lawfully removed but the Balewa government scrambled to de-link that council from Nigeria, to save SLA. On Rivers, even the Supreme Court has proclaimed Fubara’s many infractions.  Yet, Tinubu has invoked an emergency, that just saved Fubara’s neck from fit political guillotining!

    Balewa’s emergency rule was suspect.  Tinubu’s was to head off catastrophe, with oil pipelines already being bombed.

    Yes, there was fracas in the Western House chambers — twice: both in the House of Assembly and in the House of Chiefs.

    But the Balewa government knew the SLA camp had the firm motive to push chaos to fend off SLA’s ouster — yet, looked the other way.  It was this blatant partisanship that birthed the real emergency, of free arson, that collapsed the 1st Republic.

    The situation in Rivers is quite different.

    In less than two years as governor, Fubara had run up too many constitutional crimes.  And each time he bungled, he crowed and left clear, incontrovertible evidence!

    In full glare, he demolished the Rivers State House of Assembly.  Then, he bragged that the legit majority at the Assembly existed at his pleasure, and that their quarters, which they turned into emergency sitting chambers, was “my property” 

    For two years running, he passed both his budget and the screening of his commissioners and special advisers through a phoney assembly.

    Then, from October 2023 or thereabouts, he sat on the salaries and emoluments of the Rivers legislators opposed to him — culpable impunity in the eye of the law.  By the way, the Rivers Administrator should, pronto, clear this salary backlog.

    Even after the Supreme Court verdict, he was still playing games. A Fubara aide claimed they sent 2025 budget information to legislators’ WhatsApp accounts!  What a crowd!

    True, the Wike camp baited Fubara into these constitutional stumbles.  But as crisis often reveals the core of people, this one only exposed the ruthless despot trapped inside the placid Fubara!

    When the crisis broke out in October 2023, the president did scramble together the Abuja peace accord.  But while Wike wouldn’t halt his aggressive rhetoric, Fubara too wouldn’t be saved from himself, jumping from one infraction to the other.

    Just as the late Chief Edwin Clark wrote thunderous letters to disavow the Abuja treaty, based on vacuous Ijaw bias, Fubara’s “ljaw youths” hastened emergency rule with pipeline bombing!  Some ensemble!

    Were either president, Abubakar Atiku or Peter Obi would have taken the exact action as Tinubu, though both now play to the gallery on crass emotions. 

    If they did otherwise, their presidential judgment would have been questionable — for they would have left Rivers to burn in own blaze.

    Let this emergency rule slam fresh reason on both sides.  Whatever happens, Fubara has written his legacy — of endless chaos — hardly flattering!  But Wike’s own “structure” too could have cropped a terminal(?) knock.

    After Fubara, will the next Rivers governor re-find the path to peace and sane governance?  Time will tell!

  • Group begs Tinubu for reconciliation committee in Rivers

    Group begs Tinubu for reconciliation committee in Rivers

    A pro-democracy group, Coalition of Civil Society in Defence of Democracy, has urged President Bola Tinubu to establish a reconciliation committee within 14 days to resolve the crisis in Rivers State. 

    This call comes after President Tinubu declared a State of Emergency, suspending Governor Siminilayi Fubara, his Deputy and the Rivers House of Assembly for six months.

    The group’s convener, Dr. Olayemi Isaacs, at a briefing in Abuja expressed concerns that the state of emergency would only lead to a “forced peace” and encourage parties to hide their true intentions. 

    Instead, he advocated for reconciliatory steps in a democratic setting to achieve genuine peace. 

    According to Dr. Isaacs, genuine peace can only come to Rivers State through reconciliatory steps taken in a truly democratic setting.

    The Coalition of Civil Society in Defence of Democracy demanded that President Tinubu set up a panel of non-partisan eminent Nigerians to mediate between the rival parties in the Rivers State crisis. 

    It emphasised that the mediatory efforts must be concluded within 60 days, allowing the state of emergency to be lifted within 90 days of its declaration.

    The group warned that allowing the state of emergency to run longer than 90 days would compound the problem in the state, threatening and possibly jeopardising democracy. 

    It urged President Tinubu to take immediate action to establish the reconciliation committee and begin the process of resolving the crisis in Rivers State.

    “We call on President Bola Tinubu to end the state of emergency he imposed on Rivers State within 90 days of its proclamation,” Isaacs added. 

    Read Also: Project 2027: How Okpebholo is galvanising regional support for President Tinubu

    “Allowing it to run longer than this period will compound the problem in the state in a way that will threaten and possibly jeopardize Nigeria’s democracy. 

    “Furthermore, the Coalition of Civil Society in Defence of Democracy demands that President Tinubu, within 14 days, set up a panel of non-partisan eminent Nigerians to mediate between the rival parties in the Rivers State crisis. 

    “The mediatory efforts must be concluded within 60 days so that the state of emergency can be lifted within 90 days of its declaration.

    “Finally, we call on political parties to rein in their members in states that have similar political wranglings ongoing so that President Tinubu would not have the excuse to suspend democratic structures in more parts of the country. 

    “Where political parties fail to heed this counsel, they can be assured that there will not be many states left under democratic rule before the 2027 General Elections.”

  • I have no link to any militant group, says Fubara

    I have no link to any militant group, says Fubara

    Suspended Rivers Governor Siminalayi Fubara has warned against linking him to any militant group.

    The governor, in a statement by his chief press secretary (CPS), Nelson Chukwudi, said persons circulating fake videos of pipeline attack were trying hard to connect them to his supporters.

    The statement said already, the communities where the incidents were  alleged to have occurred had reacted, dismissing any claims of explosions on oil and gas facilities in their domains, and reassuring that all critical government assets within their areas were safe, secure and efficiently functioning. 

    The statement reads: “For the avoidance of doubt, Governor Siminalayi Fubara has no link to any militant group, does not contemplate any such association, and has no reason to encourage any criminal group or elements, anywhere in the State or Niger Delta, to undertake any action inimical to the peace of the people or safety and security of oil and gas facilities, and by extension, the economy of the country.

    “The Governor had repeatedly made it clear at every public event that the peace of the state is paramount to him, and that he would pay any price to secure and sustain peace in the State, as it is only in an atmosphere of peace and security that governance and development can thrive.

    Read Also: UPDATED: Fubara makes first public appearance after suspension 

    “Governor Fubara vehemently warns purveyors of violence and economic sabotage to steer clear of the State, and avoid any attempt to use his name or capitalise on the present political crisis to foment trouble in the State. 

    “It is also important to warn bloggers and social media hirelings to stop, forthwith, their campaign to create atmosphere of tension, chaos and anarchy in the State, as their fake reports and posts in the last couple of days have triggered enough wrong decisions that would not help the State move forward.

    “Security agencies should take note of these fake videos designed to misinform the people, and further paint the State in bad light, and take every necessary steps to contain them, and bring those behind them to book.”

  • NAFDAC seizes 120 fake bags of rice in Rivers 

    NAFDAC seizes 120 fake bags of rice in Rivers 

    The National Agency for Food, Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has confiscated 120 fake bags of rice from various shops in Port Harcourt, Rivers State.

    A statement by the NAFDAC Public Relations Officer (PPRO) Southsouth zone, Cyril Monye, said the discovery was made when the agency in partnership with Big Bull raided the shops. 

    The statement quoted NAFDAC Coordinator in Rivers State, Pharm. Emmanuel Onogwu, as warning the general public and traders to beware of fake and rebagged rice being sold by some unscrupulous persons.

    He said that the agency in collaboration with producers of Big Bull rice raided shops at Woji, Mile 3 and Mile 1 markets in Port Harcourt where bags of fake Big Bull rice were sold. 

    One of the shops in YKC axis of Woji, Port Harcourt suspected to be where the fake rice was being supplied had large quantities of empty fake Big Bull  bags of rice and other products including Cap Rice, stallion rice, tomato, mama pride among others. 

    Read Also: NAFDAC destroys fake drugs worth ₦100tr

    A sales girl, who gave her name as Ogechi Okafor, was also arrested at the shop.

    Other items recovered in the shop were sewing/ceiling machines, generator set, stove, thread and bags of already rebagged rice.

    Onogwu advised the public to always look out for some distinctive features that distinguished the original Big Bull products from the fake ones. 

    He named the features as the shiny ribbon that run across the threaded top, high quality of the bag, logo among others.

    He added that rebagged rice was from questionable sources and polished with chemicals to look attractive.

  • Rivers, state of emergency and saving bad case with strong hands

    Rivers, state of emergency and saving bad case with strong hands

    In a bold and necessary move, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has declared a state of emergency in Rivers State. This decision, made in response to escalating political turmoil and alarming security threats, underscores his commitment to preserving stability and protecting the lives and livelihoods of the people.

    The political crisis in Rivers had reached a boiling point, with the state legislature paralyzed, governance stalled, and tensions boiling over into violence. The President’s hand was forced by a series of explosions targeting critical oil and gas infrastructure—a stark indication that the crisis was spiralling out of control. The destruction of the Trans Niger Pipeline, an economic lifeline, was not just a local issue but a national emergency.

    Far from being a hasty decision, the state of emergency followed extensive consultations with key stakeholders. Before making the proclamation, President Tinubu convened a high-level security meeting with the National Security Adviser, the service chiefs, intelligence heads, and the Inspector-General of Police. The leadership of the National Assembly was also present, demonstrating the gravity of the situation.

    After hours of deliberation, and with fresh intelligence reports at hand, the President took the only course of action that could prevent further escalation. His decision was swift, precise, and, most importantly, constitutional.

    In his national address, Tinubu laid out the justifications for the proclamation. He pointed to the destruction of the Rivers State House of Assembly by Governor Siminalayi Fubara in December 2023, which has yet to be rebuilt. He referenced the Supreme Court’s ruling that declared the absence of a functional legislature as unconstitutional, warning that no state could function under such conditions.

    Read Also: Why NGF is silent on Rivers crisis, by DG Shittu

    “The state has been at a standstill since the crisis started, depriving its people of the dividends of democracy,” Tinubu stated.

    The suspension of Governor Fubara, his deputy, and all members of the state House of Assembly for six months is not an act of punishment but a necessary reset. In a democracy, elected officials must act in the interest of their constituents, not their political survival. The Rivers crisis had reached a point where governance was impossible. The executive and legislative arms were locked in a bitter standoff, and militant groups were exploiting the chaos to further destabilize the state.

    President Tinubu, in his characteristic wisdom, understood that an impartial administrator was needed—one with the experience and understanding of the region to navigate its complex political and security challenges. His choice of retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas as the Administrator of Rivers State is both strategic and practical.

    A former Chief of Naval Staff, Ibas is a man of discipline and deep knowledge of the Niger Delta’s terrain. His military background equips him to handle the security threats posed by militant groups, while his administrative experience positions him to stabilize governance. Importantly, he is not from Rivers State, ensuring neutrality in a highly polarized environment.

    The President has been clear: this is not military rule. The judiciary remains intact, and the administrator will not legislate. Instead, any necessary regulations will be subject to approval by the Federal Executive Council (FEC) and promulgated by the President. This careful balance ensures that while order is restored, democratic principles are upheld.

    The people of Rivers State have suffered enough. Political actors on both sides have failed them, prioritizing personal and factional interests over governance. With this intervention, President Tinubu has created a breathing space—a pause in hostilities that allows all parties to reassess their actions and return to the path of responsible leadership.

    His message is clear: Rivers State must not be allowed to descend into anarchy. The oil-rich region is too critical to Nigeria’s economy and security. Stability must be restored, and democracy must function.

    For those who question the necessity of this move, the recent explosions serve as a stark reminder of what was at stake. If decisive action had not been taken, the crisis could have escalated into a full-blown security catastrophe, with consequences not just for Rivers but for the entire country.

    As the initial six-month period unfolds, all eyes will be on Rivers State. The administrator’s ability to restore normalcy will be key. More importantly, political actors in the state must see this as a moment of reckoning. They must recognize that their mandate is not a personal prize but a responsibility to the people.

    The National Assembly will have its role to play by reviewing the emergency proclamation, but the ultimate resolution lies with the political leadership of Rivers. They must abandon the path of strife and work towards genuine reconciliation.

    President Tinubu has shown leadership at a critical moment. His decision was not just about resolving a political dispute but about protecting the fabric of Nigeria’s democracy. In times of crisis, true leadership is measured by the courage to act in the interest of the people. On this, the President has not faltered.

    For Rivers State, this is not an end but a new beginning—a chance to move from conflict to cooperation, from chaos to governance. With this intervention, there is hope that sanity will return, and the state will once again fulfill its potential as a beacon of economic and social progress.

    Steady Hand in Challenging Times

    President Tinubu once again demonstrated his unwavering commitment to governance, balancing a series of crucial engagements while addressing one of the most pressing political crises in recent history. Despite the weight of events in Rivers State, the President remained focused on his broader agenda—ensuring the nation’s progress in multiple spheres, from education and security to humanitarian efforts and national unity.

    The week began on a celebratory note as President Tinubu extended his congratulations to Dr. Fene Osakwe, the first African to win the prestigious Cyber Personality of the Year award in the United Kingdom. Osakwe’s historic achievement in cybersecurity not only highlighted Nigeria’s growing global influence in the digital space, but also underscored the administration’s commitment to excellence in innovation and technology. The President’s recognition of such feats sends a strong message: Nigerian talent is world-class and deserving of recognition.

    Yet, even in moments of celebration, the President did not lose sight of the human aspects of leadership. On the same day, he reached out to Dr. Tunji Olowolafe, expressing his condolences on the passing of his wife, Gbemisola Olutayo Olowolafe. Tinubu’s personal approach to governance—acknowledging not just policy and politics, but also the lives and losses of those who contribute to the nation’s progress—was once again evident.

    By Monday, the President was fully engaged in the critical task of nation-building. In a move that reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to strengthening higher education, he appointed the fiery priest, Bishop Matthew Kukah, as the Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of the Governing Council of the Federal University of Applied Sciences, Kachia. Bishop Kukah’s deep intellectual background and moral authority make him an inspired choice for the role, reflecting Tinubu’s strategy of bringing respected and visionary leaders into public institutions.

    Later that day, governance met faith as the President hosted an Iftar dinner for members of the National Assembly, an event that transcended religious observance to become a platform for national unity. Representing the President, Vice President Kashim Shettima called on lawmakers to prioritize cohesion over division, a timely message as the nation navigates complex economic and political realities. A striking highlight of the evening was the House of Representatives’ donation of ₦705 million to support vulnerable Nigerians during Ramadan—a testament to the administration’s ongoing commitment to social welfare.

    By midweek, Tinubu made one of the most consequential decisions of his presidency: the swearing-in of Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (Rtd) as the Sole Administrator of Rivers State. With months of political unrest escalating into a full-blown crisis, the President’s decisive action was aimed at restoring stability and ensuring governance does not grind to a halt. Flanked by his closest advisers, Tinubu executed the swearing-in with the gravity the moment demanded, making it clear that the security and welfare of Nigerians remain his top priority.

    But even amid such high-stakes governance, Tinubu’s administration continued pushing forward reforms. On Wednesday, he approved the appointment of board members for the newly established Nigerian Independent System Operator (NISO), a critical step toward ensuring efficiency and transparency in the electricity sector. The reform signals Tinubu’s commitment to tackling Nigeria’s long-standing power supply issues with decisive policy action.

    Thursday saw the President commend the National Assembly for ratifying the state of emergency in Rivers State, emphasizing that national security must always supersede partisan considerations. His gratitude to lawmakers reflected an understanding that leadership, especially in times of crisis, requires cooperation across all arms of government.

    On the same day, tragedy struck in Karu, Abuja, with a devastating tanker explosion claiming many lives; the police put it at ten persons as at Friday. Tinubu responded swiftly, ordering a thorough investigation into the incident and directing immediate medical assistance for the injured. His ability to pivot from handling a political emergency to addressing an urgent humanitarian crisis speaks to the demands of leadership and his readiness to meet them.

    The President also made time to engage with traditional leadership, hosting the Asagba of Asaba, Obi Prof. Epiphany Azinge, and representatives of the Asaba Kingdom. Such meetings are more than ceremonial—they reinforce the administration’s respect for traditional institutions as vital stakeholders in national unity and development.

    As the week drew to a close, Tinubu turned to celebrating the contributions of distinguished Nigerians, honoring two exemplary figures—pharmacist and public health icon, Ifejola Arowolo at 80, and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), Dr. Oluwakemi Pinheiro, at 60. These tributes, though seemingly symbolic, serve as reminders that nation-building is not only about policies but also about recognizing those who have shaped the country through their life’s work.

    Through the highs and the challenges of the week, one thing remained constant: Tinubu’s steady leadership. While the Rivers State emergency undoubtedly dominated national discourse, the President’s schedule reflected a leader who understands that governance is multifaceted. From education to humanitarian relief, security to economic reforms, and even moments of personal outreach, Tinubu’s week was a testament to his resolve to keep Nigeria moving forward, no matter the circumstances.

    Now that we are in a new week, which takes us to the end of the month of Ramadan, he is expected to spend time with family and his kin in Lagos, being a devout Moslem himself. We only need to wait to see as the week unfolds.

  • The imperative of emergency rule in Rivers

    The imperative of emergency rule in Rivers

    By Tunde Rahman

    As the leadership crisis rocking Rivers State escalated into the destruction of vital oil and gas infrastructure amid looming impeachment threats against Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy Ngozi Odu, President Bola Tinubu wielded the big stick last Tuesday imposing a state of emergency on the oil rich state. 

    He suspended the governor, his deputy and the inflexible state House of Assembly for a period of six months, and appointed former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (rtd), as the administrator of the state. Following his inauguration on Wednesday, Ibas has begun the critical assignment. 

    The ex-Naval chief has his job cut out for him. He has been called out of retirement to take charge of the affairs of the state and return Rivers to normalcy within six months. This is not a mean task. The retired Vice Admiral will have to summon all his courage as a soldier and be at his wits’ end to restore order and normalcy. 

    Expectedly, the declaration of emergency rule on Rivers sparked debate. It elicited criticisms from opposition elements, including the Peoples Democratic Party, and a motley crowd of disgruntled politicians being put together as a coalition group by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. 

    Being opposition politicians that they are, they failed to see the wisdom in President Tinubu acting promptly to save the state and the national economic infrastructure in Rivers. Though many know they are out to promote self-interests, they claim, however, that their grouse is the suspension of the governor, his deputy and the state assembly, contending that the President lacks such powers.

    Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, which is the operative provision for the declaration of a state of emergency, to be fair, is silent on the fate of the governor in the face of emergency declaration.

    Notably, the precedent set in our clime with respect to the fate of the governor during emergency rule is varied. When former President Olusegun Obasanjo imposed emergency rule on Plateau State in May 2004 following a surge in ethno-religious violence that led to widespread killings and destruction, he suspended then Governor Joshua Dariye and the state assembly for six months, and appointed Major-General Chris Alli (rtd) as administrator to restore order in the state. 

    The same thing happened in Ekiti two years later when the state was engulfed in a protracted political crisis. President Obasanjo suspended then Governor Ayo Fayose, his deputy Mrs. Biodun Olujinmi, the state House of Assembly as well as Hon. Friday Aderemi, the then Speaker of the legislature who was claiming to be acting governor. He appointed retired Brigadier General Tunji Olurin to administer the affairs of the state and maintain security for the next six months.

    In the case of former President Goodluck Jonathan, he declared emergency rule in selected local governments most impacted by Boko Haram terrorist attacks in Borno, Adamawa and Yobe States in 2013 without upending the political and democratic structures in the affected three states. 

    President Jonathan also retained the chairmen in the impacted local government areas. Jonathan might have spared the three governors then and their houses of assembly because the emergency rule declared in the three states was limited to the most-impacted councils.

    Regarding Plateau State emergency proclamation, the Supreme Court that would have set a clear precedent in the matter failed to determine the constitutionality or otherwise of the dissolution of democratic structures on the grounds that the suit was procedurally incompetent because it was instituted at the time by the suspended legislators in the name of Plateau without the authorisation of the state.

    Some legal minds have referred to the Emergency Powers Act of 1961, which though no longer in use in the country but which provided justification for the dissolution of democratic structures and suspension of the fundamental human rights when emergency rule was declared on the Western Region in 1962 by the late Tafawa Balewa Government. It was in respect of two cases, namely Adegbenro vs. Attorney-General of the Federation (1962) NLR 338 and F.R.A.Williams vs Dr. M.A. Majekodunmi (1962) NLR 328, where the apex court in its judgment validated the Emergency Powers Act 1961 to justify the dissolution.

    The logic in the Supreme Court verdict in the matter of Plateau State emergency proclamation is unquestionable going by the argument of legal icon Professor Koyinsola Ajayi (SAN), who spoke on Arise Television last Wednesday. 

    According to him, “the justices of the Supreme Court in that judgement were of the view that they were never eager to review the decision of the President when confronted with a present and imminent danger to lives and property and acted to restore public order and public safety.”

    Beyond the legal rigmarole, it would appear that what is germane in determining what happens to the democratic structures in a state during emergency rule period is the circumstance or situation in the state, the magnitude of the threat to public order and security of citizens and property in such a state. After all, no one remembers the provision of the law in an atmosphere of violence and disorder.

    Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) put the matter succinctly when he fielded questions from State House Correspondents on Wednesday. He said: “The government stands on the tripod: the Executive, the Legislature, and the Judiciary, and you (the governor) have made the functioning of government impossible. It is not enough for the Executive, to say, we are spending money, even the money you want to spend, the State Assembly must have appropriated it. These are some of the findings that the Supreme Court made. And at the end of the day, the Supreme Court said, or came to a decision, that the governor’s behaviour was like a despot, and that as the situation was, there was no government in Rivers. If there was no government in Rivers, what would we be looking for?” 

    Fubara overreached and outplayed himself. He got carried away by the sentimental support he enjoys, and not strategy. He felt that violence would give him what he threw away by not stooping low to win. When some militants issued threats to destroy oil pipelines and other critical infrastructure, the governor failed to dissuade them. In fact, he had said openly that he would tell the people when to act. And a week after, some oil installations went up in flames. No one needs a soothsayer to understand what enabled the destruction. 

    The governor also prevented 27 lawmakers from performing their work and even demolished the state assembly complex. He moved the four lawmakers loyal to him to the Government House, where they usurped the legislative functions of the 32-member assembly. 

    Declaring emergency rule on Rivers, President Tinubu had said, among other things, in his address: “Some militants had threatened fire and brimstone against their perceived enemy of the governor who has up till now not disowned them. Apart from that, both the House and the governor have not been able to work together. Both of them do not realise that they are in office to work together for the peace and good governance of the state.”

    Those criticising the declaration of emergency rule in Rivers on the grounds that President Tinubu, while in opposition, strongly condemned the emergency declaration by former President Jonathan in Adamawa, Borno and Yobe states conveniently forgot to mention Tinubu’s opposition to former Edo State Governor Godwin Obaseki who muscled the state assembly and particularly refused to inaugurate the 14 lawmakers who were duly elected by their constituents till the end of his tenure. Tinubu called out Obaseki, labeling him a despot who emasculated the legislature, which is pivotal to the functioning of democracy, the same way he has condemned Governor Fubara. 

    Again, the National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, has added democratic components to the emergency proclamation by announcing regular oversight on the work of the administrator and the National Assembly performing the law-making functions of the Rivers State Assembly as provided for in the constitution. The emergency declaration also helped to save Fubara, despite his imprudence, from the seemingly-imminent impeachment, which would have taken him out completely for the duration of his tenure and rendered him ineligible for any election going forward.

    In the final analysis, the President has demonstrated courage and exemplary leadership by acting to save the nation from what would have adversely affected her economic fortunes and reverse the gains already made. Oil production, which some years ago went as low 900, 000 bpd, is today hovering around 1.6 million bpd. Important governmental initiatives such as NELFUND for indigent students and CREDICORP, vital infrastructure projects being embarked upon by the government like road networks as well as monthly hefty receipts by state governors from the federal allocation accounts would have all been imperilled if the President had delayed taking that decisive action.

    What is required now, in my view, is for political stakeholders in the country, particularly Niger Delta leaders, to rally round, rein in the feuding parties – suspended Governor Fubara, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory Nyesom Wike and the state House of Assembly members – and ensure a quick return to normalcy in Rivers State and a final resolution of the political crisis. 

    The National Assembly has moved to take an important step in this direction by indicating it would set up a body of eminent leaders to help resolve the crisis among the contending parties and return the state to the path of peace and tranquillity. The federal lawmakers deserve commendation for acting expeditiously to approve the emergency declaration and for their resolve to ensure a quick resolution of the crisis.

    *Rahman is Senior Special Assistant to President Tinubu on Media, Publicity & Special Duties.

  • Why NGF is silent on Rivers crisis, by DG Shittu

    Why NGF is silent on Rivers crisis, by DG Shittu

    The Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) has explained why it has not commented on the unfolding political crisis in Rivers State.

    The NGF’s Director General, Abdulateef Shittu explained that “as a technical and policy hub, comprising governors elected on different platforms, the body (NGF) elects to steer clear of taking positions that may alienate members with varying political interests.”

    Shittu explained his organisation’s position in a statement issued on Saturday.

    The statement reads: “The Nigeria Governors’ Forum (NGF) has received media enquiries requesting it to comment on some recent political developments in the country. 

    “The forum wishes to clarify that it is an umbrella body for subnational governments to promote unified policy positions and collaborate with relevant stakeholders in pursuit of sustainable socioeconomic growth and the well-being of the people. 

    “As a technical and policy hub comprising Governors elected on different platforms, the body elects to steer clear of taking positions that may alienate members with varying political interests. 

    “In whatever language it is written, taking positions on contentious partisan issues would mean a poor sense of history — just a few years after the Forum survived a fundamental division following political differences among its members. 

    “Regardless, the Forum is reputed for its bold positions on governance and general policy matters of profound consequences, such as wages, taxes, education, and universal healthcare, among others. 

    “We call for the understanding of the public and the media, confident that appropriate platforms and crisis management mechanisms would take care of any such issues.”

  • Emergency Rule will restore sanity in Rivers, say Youths in Parliament

    Emergency Rule will restore sanity in Rivers, say Youths in Parliament

    The Youth in Parliament has expressed support for declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State, describing it as a necessary step to restore order amid escalating political crisis in the State.

    The group believed the decision is crucial to prevent further chaos and ensure stability of governance in Rivers.

    A statement by chairman of the group, a son to former Oyo Governor and lawmaker representing Ogbomoso North, South and Orire federal constituency at the House of Representatives, Olamijuwonlo Alao-Akala, stated the declaration of emergency rule in Rivers was in order considering  affairs in the State. 

    He said it was important for the President to do everything possible to restore sanity and protect the interests of the people.

    He said the political crisis in Rivers State has worsened in recent weeks with tensions rising between key political stakeholders, which has led to concerns about a breakdown in law and order.

    Read Also; UN, NHRC, NITDA advocate human rights protection in AI deployment 

    Alao-Akala acknowledged that while emergency rule should not be viewed as a long-term solution, it is the best course of action to prevent anarchy and safeguard residents from political fallout.

    “The Youth in Parliament stands for democracy and good governance. However, when democracy is threatened by internal wranglings, it is the duty of the authorities to step in and restore stability. The people of Rivers deserve peace, and if emergency rule is what will guarantee that, then it is justified,” he added.

    The Youth in Parliament, a body of young political leaders advocating for increased youth involvement in governance however called on all political actors in Rivers State to prioritize the welfare of the people over personal or partisan interests.

  • Group berates National Assembly for backing State of Emergency in Rivers

    Group berates National Assembly for backing State of Emergency in Rivers

    The Coalition of Democrats in Africa (CoDA) has condemned the National Assembly’s approval of a state of emergency in Rivers State, describing it as illegal.

    In a statement issued after an emergency meeting in Abuja on Thursday, CoDA President Ambassador Ibrahim Mustapha accused Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Speaker of the House of Representatives Tajudeen Abbas of neglecting their constitutional duty to check the executive’s excesses.

    According to the group, the National Assembly has abandoned its role as a defender of democracy.

    “The suspension of the democratically elected governor, deputy governor, and state House of Assembly is a direct assault on Nigeria’s democracy,” the coalition said.

    CoDA said that the move set a troubling precedent that could undermine governance in Nigeria.

    “By endorsing this, Akpabio, Abbas, and their colleagues have betrayed not only the Nigerian people but also the very essence of constitutional governance,” the statement reads.

    Read Also: Rivers State of Emergency: Legal expert backs Tinubu, slams critics  

    “This is not just about Rivers State. It is about the very soul of our democracy. If lawmakers can sit back and watch an elected governor, deputy governor, and an entire state assembly removed without due process, then no state is safe, and no democracy is secure.

    “The National Assembly may have failed us, but the people of Nigeria must not fail themselves. We must remain vigilant, speak out, and demand the restoration of constitutional order before it is too late,” the statement added. 

    The group also reminded lawmakers that their actions would be judged by history.