Tag: roadmap

  • Power and infrastructure: a roadmap

    The greatest paradox of the administration of out-going President Goodluck Jonathan is that it seems to have been flying without wings these past five years. Though there is a much-vaunted Transformation Agenda, it turned out to be merely an empty slogan with neither substance nor intent by Jonathan and his team to effect change. The result is that the rot in the system only deepened in Jonathan’s time as signposted by the state of power and infrastructure in Nigeria today.

    With less than one week to the end of the Jonathan era, the nation seems to be about to unravel. Electricity generation has fallen to an all-time low and the nation has been assailed by near blackout for a few weeks now, with its attendant deleterious effects on other sectors of the economy. Key physical infrastructure like road and rail systems have remained largely dilapidated and unsustainable for driving a modern economy.

    The Muhammadu Buhari administration must therefore critically revisit the power and infrastructure templates with a view to totally revamping them and retooling them along the path of a twenty-first century economy. Nigeria’s power situation which indeed has become a conundrum seems to have stumped all the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) administrations for the past 16 years. The chief reason is that it has been mired in corruption and the more the billions of dollars being thrown at it, the more hopeless the situation is.

    With an estimated $25 billion supposedly spent since the administration of President Olusegun Obasanjo to date, power output at this moment sub 2,000 megawatts even though the potential capacity is said to be about 10,000megawatts. But consider the folly of building gas-fired generating plants – about 10 of them over the last 10 years – without the composite gas facilities to power them. Today, most of the new plants cannot be switched on and rolled into the national grid because the gas component was not factored into the plan ab initio.

    Several of the supporting power facilities like sub-stations, initiated over the last 10 years in far-flung areas of the country were largely abandoned after huge contract sums had been paid and in some cases, twice over.

    Though most of the generating and distribution arms of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) were unbundled and privatised over a year ago, the impact has been insignificant. The divestment process was froth with fraud as cronies and party men that had no financial and technical capacities to run power firms were favoured.

    But 18 months down the line, neither generation nor distribution has improved. Such basic matter as installing of metres to forestall arbitrary billings has not been carried out by the distribution companies (Discos). Instead, they have seemingly been content with creaming of the old, decadent order while corralling the government to approve scarce public resources for them as long-term loans. They have also enjoyed tariff hikes even when hardly any value has been added.

    The transmission arm of the sector which has remained under the control of the Federal Government has been blighted by inertia as the new management firm, the Transmission Company of Nigeria (TCN), is embroiled in management tussle since it was set up. Not much improvement has been made on the old facilities and hardly any new one added. The result is that TCN has no capacity to take up to 5,000 megawatts of power if such quantity is generated anytime soon.

    Like power, road and rail infrastructure remain very weak and undeveloped. The major road arteries like the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway, the Lagos-Benin Expressway, the Enugu-Aba Expressway and the East-West road spanning from Benin to Port-Harcourt need to be upgraded and built to modern day standards. Same for some of the major highways in the north like Kano to Maiduguri and Abuja to Kaduna.

    Time is now too to set machinery in motion for modern rail lines in Nigeria. This is a vast country and the roads would always face rapid dilapidation if they are not supported by vast rail network. Massive and quality development will always elude this country if government does not see modern rail system as sine qua non to her modernity.

    It is the same with air transport. The plan to make Nigeria the hub of air transport in Africa must be pursued by the continued development of her existing airports – both passenger and cargo facilities. For maritime transport too, the lock-down witnessed in Nigeria’s prime ports in Lagos in the last one month makes the argument for immediate revamp valid. The rail line in Nigeria’s number one port at Apapa needs to be revamped and modernised urgently so that trucks would never have to impede activities there any longer.

    The Buhari administration must understand that power and transport infrastructure are the twin engines on which a modern state is run. Therefore, it must adopt a bold new approach – it needs international long-term financial grants but more important, minders who are brimming with integrity, professionalism and patriotism.

  • Roadmap to no electricity

    SIR: Give Nigerians steady electricity first, and everything else shall follow.  Many people were very jubilant that the days of epileptic power supply were over.  The onset of President Jonathan’s roadmap to electricity supply caused Nigerians to enjoy a sweet change to having full current and almost uninterrupted power.  Electric generator dealers were beginning to mourn the end of their business.  Surprisingly, the shrewd ones were not shaking; instead they stored more generators in their warehouses.  They were sure that their colleagues were panicking to a premature autopsy.  And today, they are smiling to the bank because they have sold out their stock and are importing more.

    What secret do they have?  They know the beast they are dealing with.  Nigerian government is so mired in decadence; it will take a messiah to bring electricity at every turn of the switch.  Politicians will say and do anything to give the populace the conjecture that they mean well for the country.  Meanwhile, they only want to tease dejected minds in order to create an avenue to drain the national treasury.  Think about how many billions of dollars, no one talks in naira when it comes to the posh project, which has been sunk into the abyss to revive the dinosaur known by different names with the objective to achieve steady power supply.

    Presently, many communities must agree that the euphoria is over and the nightmare has returned.  The government finally celebrated the privatization of the power sector, a laudable accomplishment by international standard.  Unfortunately for Nigerians, that ushers in the beginning of electricity sharing or total blackout.  The town of Umuoji in Anambra State, for example, was told by officials of the private company, Enugu Electricity Distribution Company (EEDC) that one of their two main transformers broke down about October, 2013.  Since, they chose to ration power every two days for the two sections of the town with the remaining transformer.  Of late, they said that the active transformer broke down also and now the entire town is in a state of blanketed darkness.  Barbers, welders, tailors and the general public are suffering to maintain a modern living.

    The buzz word by the government is patience.  They said it will take time to re-construct the dilapidated electricity infrastructure.  But they do not have the goodwill.  The people have for long lost any trace of trust. The abuse and corruption in the electricity reform has made the citizenry apathetical.  The government is vowing that it will replicate the success of the telecommunication industry which started lethargically after privatization.

    Nigeria is losing out.  The president cannot boast to Western dignitaries that he is leading a civilized country when the society is running on power generators.  One hopes there is a time in a man’s life when he looks into his soul and sees the folly of his decisions.  If by 2015 election there is no conviction in actualizing President Jonathan’s roadmap to power supply, he will be stomping on frayed nerves of the electorates during his campaign.

     

    •Pius Okaneme,

    Umuoji, Anambra State.

  • Fed Govt’s roadmap for active SMEs, others

    Fed Govt’s roadmap for active SMEs, others

    The National Enterprise Development Programme (NIRP), according to the Federal Government, holds the key to strengthening the Micro, Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (MSMEs) sector. But, how far can this go? Ibrahim Mammaga reports

    By most accounts, the Nigeria Industrial Revolution Plan (NIRP) and the National Enterprise Development Programme (NEDEP) are aimed at spurring the growth of the Micro, Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (MSMEs) sector.

    The two programmes were launched by President Goodluck Jonathan on February 11 in Abuja.

    Jonathan said at the inauguration that the programmes, particularly the NIRP, would provide a comprehensive roadmap for transforming the nation’s industrial landscape, boosting skills’ development and enhancing job creation, among others.

    According to him, NEDEP alone is capable of creating 3.5 million jobs across the country by reinforcing the activities of MSMEs.

    Besides, Jonathan observed that NIRP would boost the revenue of Nigerian manufacturers, while fast-tracking the country’s economic and industrial growth.

    “ NIRP and NEDEP are targeted at transforming Nigerian businesses and changing the lives of the ordinary people.

    “The programmes will accelerate inclusive growth and job creation, while stemming the drain on our foreign reserves caused by importing what we can produce locally.

    “NEDEP has placed micro, small and medium enterprises at the centre of our national economic policy; our vision is to take this new model for national enterprise development to all the 774 local governments in our country,’’ he said.

    Pledging the Federal Government’s commitment to the programmes, Jonathan said that his administration would set up a council, comprising the federal, state and local governments, to regulate the activities of small and medium enterprises across the country.

    “We will not only sustain the momentum of the NIRP and NEDEP programmes but we will also expand their impacts and reach,’’ he added.

    Judging by economists’ assessment, the MSMEs sector is one of the most important sectors of Nigerian economy.

    Analysts argue that the sector comprises a greater percentage of businesses in Nigeria and contributes 75 per cent of the country’s employment.

    Available data from the National Bureau of Statistic also indicate that out of the 17.2 million MSMEs in the country, over 17 million of them are micro enterprises.

    Observers insist that in spite of challenges facing the growth of MSMEs in the country, the sector contributes about 75 per cent of Nigeria’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and provides jobs for many Nigerians.

    Analysts, therefore, agree that a nurtured and well-structured MSMEs sector can contribute more significantly to employment generation, wealth creation, poverty reduction and sustainable economic growth in the country.

    They, nonetheless, call for the introduction of pragmatic measures to address some of the challenges hindering the growth of MSMEs in the country.

    However, Alhaji Bature Masari, the Director-General, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Agency of Nigeria (SMEDAN), says that NEDEP was initiated to address some of the challenges.

    According to him, NEDEP is planning to generate about five million direct and indirect jobs between 2013 and 2015.

    “The entrepreneurship training/business development service component is being implemented on the platform of ‘One Local Government; One Product’.

    “The access to finance component is overseen by the Bank of Industry (BOI), while the skills acquisition programme is handled by the Industrial Training Fund (ITF).

    “The ‘One Local Government; One Product’ programme is guided by research that is based on the experiences of successful similar enterprise development initiatives in Africa and Asia and pilot projects in Kano State and Niger,’’ he says.

    Masari says that SMEDAN recently conducted sensitisation/needs’ assessment programme in 22 states, adding that agro-allied products were selected in each of the local government areas of the selected states, based on their comparative and competitive advantages.

    He says that arrangements have been concluded on when to implement the programme in the remaining 14 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

    “The agency has also conducted baseline surveys and value-chain analyses in six pilot states — Benue Anambra, Lagos, Bauchi, Bayelsa and Kano — while plans are underway to conduct this activity in the remaining 30 states and the FCT,’’ he says.

    Masari says that cooperative societies and trade associations are being formed, registered and assisted to develop bankable business plans, as a prelude to plans to give them access to finance, markets and equipment.

    “More than 2,500 out of 21,834 cooperative societies across the country and their business plans have been handed over to BOI for appraisal and eventual financing,’’ he adds.

    The director-general says that SMEDAN is also planning to build the capacity of the various cooperative societies that benefited from NEDEP nationwide.

    On the sustainability of the programmes, Dr Olusegun Aganga, the Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment, stresses that NIRP and NEDEP should adopt inclusive structures, which involve other government agencies and the private sector, to ensure adequate policy synergy.

    He, however, pledges his ministry’s cooperation with all the stakeholders in efforts to ensure the successful implementation of the programmes.

    Although the general consensus of opinion is that NIRP and NEDEP are vital economic development tools, analysts, nonetheless, underscore the need for timely and adequate funding of specific schemes of the programmes.

    They insist that a strong political will and adequate funding of the programmes will spur wealth creation, poverty alleviation and massive rural industrialisation in the country.

     

    •Mammaga is of the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)

  • Will power roadmap bring sustainable light?

    Will power roadmap bring sustainable light?

    When President Goodluck Jonathan unveiled the power sector reform roadmap on August 3, 2010, it was seen as a pathfinder to the country’s age-long power problems. Two years on, the roadmap is still a work in progress, writes EMEKA UGWUANYI Assistant Editor (Energy).

     

    The availability of reliable electric power to the homes and businesses of our citizens has been one item in our national life that we have approached with so much hope and yet experienced so much frustration over the past decades. Various regimes, in the distant past, paid little attention to the sector but in the recent decades, subsequent regimes have put in billions of naira to reverse the neglect and mismanagement which has characterised the sector.

    “I and my Vice President are conscious that what we do with the Nigerian electricity supply industry will go a long way in determining whether Nigeria remains in darkness or joins the rest of the world in the race for development. Our commitment is to bring an end to our nation’s stunted growth and usher in the fresh air of prosperity by pursuing a new era of sector-wide reform which is driven by improved service delivery to every class of customers in the Nigerian electricity sector.

    “The full implementation of the electric power sector reform has been a key priority for this administration. We established the Presidential Action Committee on Power (PACP) with a view to eliminating red tape and the often over-bureaucratic and inefficient nature of decision-making in government.

    “The Presidential Task Force on Power (PTFP) is the engine room that drives the vision of the PACP. The PTFP has the mandate to develop the roadmap and provide monitoring to ensure effective implementation of the plan. Their activities will introduce a greater degree of transparency to the way in which we implement the reforms and greater accountability on the part of those responsible.” These were the words of President Goodluck Jonathan while presentating the roadmap.

    Going by the President’s comments, the roadmap was borne out of the seemingly intractable power problems. Despite funds sunk into the sector by successive administrations, no tangible results were achieved.

    The roadmap is a well-intentioned statement of milestones to be achieved at specific periods, designed to prepare the sector for takeover by private operators because of government’s seeming failure to manage the utility. Until last year total power wheeled into the national grid didn’t exceed 3000 megawatts (MW).

    Besides, if the government had the capacity to generate more megawatts and the will to wheel it into the grid, the grid appeared so fragile that it hardly took 3000MW hence the incessant system collapse, which threw the country into total blackout most times.

    Although the roadmap failed to meet almost all its targets in generation, transmission and distribution of power and the privatisation timetable, it was able to give direction to the sector. The generation figures, improvement in transmission and distribution reports by the government have become more dependable and most of all, the transfer of ownership and management of the power sector asset to the private sector appear more realistic.

    Power supply is becoming less erratic, and besides some security concerns, genuine investors’ confidence is increasing but unless the privatisation is done right, there may be a problem. There is need to ensure that the preferred bidders that would take over these assets are desirous to take Nigeria out of darkness on sustainable basis.

    In order not to completely put the fate of over 160 million Nigerians, the economy and developmental aspirations into the hands of one person or a company, the government structured the privatisation terms differently for the various power assets, making the private investor the owner, with the federal and state governments owning equity shares.

     

    Privatisation

     

    The Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) is saddled with the responsibility of ensuring that the 18 successor companies unbundled from the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) secure the right investors in terms of technical and financial competence.

    The assets for privatisation include 11 distribution companies (Discos) and six generation companies (Gencos). The distribution companies include Abuja Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Benin Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Enugu Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Eko Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Ibadan Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Ikeja Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Jos Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Kaduna Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Kano Electricity Distribution Company Plc Port Harcourt Electricity Distribution Company Plc, and Yola Electricity Distribution Company Plc.

    The Gencos include Ughelli Power Plc; and Sapele Power Plc in Delta State; Geregu Power Plc in Kogi State; and Afam Power Plc in Rivers State. These four power plants are thermal plants that run on gas while the remaining two – Shiroro Power Plc; and Kainji Power Plc both in Niger State are hydro power plants.

    The 11 discos are part of the 18 successor companies unbundled from the PHCN but because none of the bidders met the requirement for the Kaduna Electricity Distribution Company, the 21 firms currently shortlisted would be jostling for 10 discos.

     

    Shortlisted Discos

     

    Oando Consortium; Vigeo Holdings, Gumco, African Corporation AFC &CESC, Honeywell, and 18 other firms were among the shortlisted by the BPE from the 54 firms that submitted bids to acquire the 11 electricity distribution companies.

    Having passed the technical evaluation bid test, the BPE will on October 16, open the financial bids for the 21 companies.

    For the GenCos, the BPE had last Tuesday opened the financial bid for the preferred for eight investors that were shortlisted for five generation companies as the three firms that submitted bids for the sixth GenCo – Afam Power Plc, couldn’t meet the requirements. The eight companies offered a total of $1,119,363,150.05 for the five power plants.

     

    Firms for Discos

     

    The eight that qualified for the five companies are Amperion Power Distribution Company Limited (Geregu), Mainstream Energy Solutions Limited (Kainji), North-South Power Company Limited (Shiroro), Amperion Power Distribution Company Limited (Ughelli), Feniks Electricity Limited (Ughelli), Transcorp & Woodrock/ Symbion/ Medea/ PSL/ Thomassen (Ughelli), CMEC/Eurafric Energy JV (Sapele) and JBN-Nestoil Power Services Limited (Sapele).

    The NCP reminded Amperion Power Distribution Limited to be aware that the rules allow them to win only one Genco. Accordingly, if they win both Ughelli Power Plc and Geregu Power Plc, they will have to give up one.

    The Federal Government is selling majority stakes in power plants and letting private investors buy as much as 70 per cent of 11 distribution companies spun out of the former state-owned utility as it seeks private investment to curb power shortages.

    The Chairman, Technical Committee of NCP, Mr Atedo Peterside said all the winning bids are “subject to the approval” of the National Council on Privatisation headed by Vice President Namadi Sambo. Bidders have 15 days after the final approval to post a bank guarantee for 15 per cent of the bid amount and pay 25 per cent of their bid within another 15 days after the deal has been signed, he said. The balance should be paid over six months or as agreed with the privatisation agency.

    The transmission segment of the sector is wholly retained by the Federal Government but has been given out on management contract to a Canadian company – Manitoba Hydro International, for three years. On expiration of this term, the government may terminate the contract if it feels satisfied with the ability of Nigerians to manage it effectively but otherwise, the contract would be extended.

    Initially, the completion of the privatisation programme was scheduled to end by February this year but had to be extended by eight months to accommodate the requests and desires of the investors who submitted bids for the generation and transmission and distribution assets.

    But because the entire roadmap was anchored on a customer-driven sector-wide plan to achieve stable power supply, it was gathered that the extension of the privatisation timelines by the BPE became imperative. A BPE source explained that the bidders said they were not carried along on the initial privatisation package because they were not given the opportunity to carry out due diligence on the assets they submitted bids for and also measure the bankability of the projects, among others. It was in view of these requests that the BPE reviewed the timetable to October.

    The roadmap expressed such fears when it said that investors would be reluctant to make large-scale investments in the upstream and downstream sectors of the electricity industry unless they are confident that commensurate investments in the midstream sector will also take place: This was the reason the management of transmission was contracted out to a private company, the government said has both the requisite project management and technical expertise.

    The transaction timeline by BPE showed that the evaluation of the technical bids for the successor companies in generation and distribution companies would take place between August 14 and 28, 2012 after which the NCP would approve and announce the results of the technical evaluation by September 11, 2012. Although, there were slight shifts by few days in some of the schedules such as the announcement of the bidders that scaled the technical valuation of Discos’ bids, but the BPE stuck to its October deadline.

    The timeline for the shortlisted bidders for generation companies to submit their letters of credit was September 18, 2012 while October 2, 2012 is the deadline for shortlisted bidders for distribution companies, which the NCP would approve to finally pave way for the opening of financial bids of the shortlisted investors.

    The announcement of the preferred bidders for the generating companies, the BPE said, is October 9, 2012 while October 23, 2012 is the date for the announcement of the preferred bidders for the distribution companies.

    The BPE said that alterations in the announcement dates of some results such that occurred when the successful companies that passed the technical bids evaluation for distribution companies, was to ensure transparency in the privatization process.

     

    Gencos’ terms of

    privatisation

     

    The two privatised hydro power stations would be on concession for between 25-30 years while the four thermal plants would be 100 per cent sold but original plan in the roadmap was that thermal generating plants would be privatised via the sale of a minimum of 51 per cent equity to core investors that clearly demonstrate the technical and financial ability to operate and expand each plant.

    The roadmap further noted that care would be taken, by working closely with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) to ensure that a monopoly or oligopoly of market power in the generation sector is not acquired through these divestitures.

    The BPE said that certainly the preferred private investor for any asset would have at least 51 per cent equity holding. It said the government deliberately structured it that way to ensure that all the concerns are private sector-run; adding that with 51 per cent or more equity shares, the preferred private sector bidder will have more directors on the board and exercise all the necessary powers.

    The states where the assets situate were mandated to own shares not more 20 per cent in such assets but apart from equities due to them in that regard, they (states) would further be considered for extra equity ownership, which would be based on the quantum of investment they made in such states. Most of the state governments had immensely invested in some the assets located in their areas. Therefore, the extra equity holding they will be considered for would be more of compensation and that extra equity should come from the Federal Government’s owned equity.

    The states that made investments in the power facilities would submit their claims (investments made in the facilities) to the government. Such claims would be evaluated and ratified by the NERC. On the basis of the feedback from NERC, the Federal Government will determine the level of extra equity to be allocated the states from its shares.

     

    Discos’ terms of

    privatisation

     

    As stipulated in Gencos, the preferred private sector bidder would have the highest equity holding of 51 per cent or more in each of the 11 distribution companies to be able to be in charge and take decisions. But the difference here is that none of the Discos would be sold 100 per cent. The federal and state governments where the distribution companies are located, would own statutory or recommended equities of not more than 20 per cent and extra equities, which would be measured by level of the state government’s investment in the asset.

     

    Targets, misses,

    achievements

     

    The Federal Government in the roadmap expressed commitment to achieve 14,000 MW of power generation capacity, which would be available by December 2013. Out of this, 4,500 MW would come from PHCN generation assets, 4,775 MW from the NIPP plants and 3,300 MW from independent power producers such as Shell and Agip, among others. Shell’s Afam VI in Rivers State, is a combined cycle plant with installed capacity of 650MW while Agip’s Okpai plant in Delta State has installed capacity of 460MW. In the short term, the government’s generation target achievable by April 2011 was put at 7000MW.

    To meet Vision 20:2020 target of 40,000MW, the government said it would require investments in power generating capacity alone of at least US$ 3.5 billion per annum for the next 10 years. None of the targets was met as the PHCN assets currently generates about 3000MW and the NIPP 1150MW. The Managing Director, Niger Delta Power Holding Company (NDPHC), which supervises the 10 medium sized power plants being constructed under the National Integrated Power Project (NIPP), Mr. James Olotu, said the Federal Government has so far spent about $8 billion on the projects.

    Olotu said out of the NIPP’s 10 plants, four are operational, which include Olorunsogo in Ogun State, Omotosho in Ondo State, Sapele in Delta State and Alaoji in Abia State. Alaoji according to him, came on board this month.

    He also noted that the total supply capacity from the four plants, which currently is wheeled into the national grid stands at 1150 megawatts (MW), which is expected to jump to about 1500mw by December.

    The other six plants, he added, are under construction and are at between 80 per cent and 90 per cent completion stage.

    He said: “By the end of this year, from all the stations, we will be looking at about 2500mw, which would be dependent on gas delivery. We are also building hundreds of thousands of kilometres of transmission line across the country as substations to support those transmission lines.

    “The company commissioned 150MVA transmission facility at the Ikeja West Transmission Station and another 150MVA would be commissioned this month at Akangba. Several sizes of this transmission facilities and smaller one have been commissioned and more would be commissioned before the end of this year.

    “We are also building several thousands of kilometres of lines for distribution and also the infrastructure and substations to support it. We are also building gas pipelines within the same fund to ensure that wherever you have a power plant there is gas that is flowing there and there is a line pipe that will be feeding the plant.”

     

    New projects

     

    The Federal Government revealed in the roadmap that it had plans that would lead to the commencement of construction of the Mambilla Power plant, which would have an installed capacity of 2,600MW and Zungeru Power with a capacity of 700MW as well as expand the Gurara Hydro power plant, which currently has installed 30MW to a capacity of 300 MW, 200 MW dual-fired power plant in Kaduna, which are expected to be completed within the next six years to complete.

    The Minister of State for Power Arc Darius Dickson Ishaku told the NCP last month that the Kaduna power plant is in progress, noting that eight gas turbine generators for the plant are at Onne port while the Mambilla installed capacity of 2600MW as contained in the roadmap has been revised to 3050MW. Update on the project, according to him, is still at bankable feasibility studies. The feasibility studies’ completion is last quarter of this year, adding that the entire Mambilla project would be financed through equity debt structure of 80:20 per cent ration by Exim Bank of China. The engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) would be completed by first quarter of 2013, he added. For the Zungeru plant, the minister said the project’s contract renegotiation is ongoing; the procurement of project management consultancy at BPP certification level while the environmental impact assessment has been completed.

    He also stated that the Federal Ministry of Power is in discussion with EximmBank of China for the funding of loan component, adding that the government is constructing a 10.75MW wind power plant in Katsin a, which consists of 37 wind turbines. The project, he said, was 98 per cent completion as at August 30, 2012.