Tag: Robert Egbe

  • Gutter queen

    By Robert Egbe

    It was the tall, dark Corporal seated on the backless chair on my left who saw them first.

    I do not recall what we were talking about, but he halted in mid-sentence and stared towards the door.

    My eyes followed his. So did the others’: – policemen, lawyers, claimants, defendants – we watched the plainclothes female detective usher two persons into the prosecutors’ office.

    Three others – a man and two women, probably friends or relatives – followed quietly in their wake.

    In about three steps, the two persons passed the big wooden file cabinet beside the door and approached the long desk around which we sat or stood.

    They were an unlikely pair, but it was not the man on the right that held the Corporal’s gaze. It was the woman, tall, fair and not unattractive, even without make-up.

    Her eyes slanted a little, but she was neither Asian nor biracial.

    Her black jumpsuit clung, everywhere, rendering the nearly freckle-faced man of slightly below average height on her right irrelevant in our eyes.

    He could have been a gnome for all every man in the large room cared.

    “There,” the detective said, pointing at a spot near the other cabinet beside the photocopier.

    Her voice was surprisingly soft and her manner unassuming. You could not have guessed she was a cop.

    I heard a low whisper from another seat to my left.

    It sounded like my name, so I turned.

    It was the ‘Prince of Biafra’, that intelligent, good-natured Sergeant, whose soul pined for a prosperous, equitable Nigeria and, paradoxically, an independent Igbo homeland.

    There seemed to be something in his left eye; it kept blinking. I looked away, but he whispered my name again.

    READ ALSO: The man who called a lawyer ‘idiot’

    When our eyes met this time, I realised his blink was actually a wink, and then he did a subtle Indian head bobble to his left.

    But I didn’t get his drift at once, so he bobbled again, again and again, until, confused, I looked at the visitors one more time: freckle face stood too close to the woman, almost as if, as if they were joined at the arm.

    That’s when I caught on.

    I nodded and mouthed my thanks as I slipped out my phone and opened the camera.

    But they were just two steps opposite where I stood and I could not surreptitiously get a clean shot.

    The woman was fidgety and, one time when she moved the lime handbag in her right hand, the shiny handcuff binding her left wrist to freckle face’s right wrist was exposed.

    The detective beckoned on a girl in a dark hijab. She brought a white plastic chair and stood behind it holding up a large blue cloth.

    The detective motioned both suspects to the chair.

    They made for the seat at the same time.

    Freckle face was nimbler and jarred his fellow prisoner’s arm as he moved, but the chair was right by her side, so she dropped her lean frame on it and shot him a bad look.

    When she opened her mouth, you could tell that this was no lady.

    Her language, if not her voice, was harsh, pompous and her attitude ungraceful.

    If she were a queen, she would be of the gutter variety.

    A woman with a camera pulled up a seat opposite her but had difficulty getting a mugshot because the queen was still ranting.

    Exasperated, the detective offered soothing words, but she turned on her too.

    “Don’t disrespect me!” the queen snapped, “Didn’t you see what he did? My job is on the line. I’ll wait for my lawyer. After all, it is a bailable offence.”

    I found out later that she was a bank worker facing a phone theft charge.

    Nevertheless, didn’t she realise she was in a lion’s den? Perhaps she thought she was a Daniel?

    The detective backed off and apologised.

    The other policemen, irked by the conciliatory approach, turned on the detective.

    “Why did you bring her here?”

    “Don’t you know she does not belong here?”

    “How can you arrest a fine girl just like that?”

    “Please wait for her lawyer to come before you take her picture.”

    And on and on they went, barely straight-faced.

    The detective, getting the joke, put a hand to her mouth to stifle a giggle.

    It was fun, and, overcome by a sudden spirit of mischief, I joined in the mockery.

    “Officer, please, don’t bring this kind of beautiful woman here again,” I added.

    The Corporal chuckled quietly at me.

    “If only she knows she will sleep in detention this night,” he whispered.

    But the queen was, blissfully, unaware.

    Buoyed by the fictitious groundswell of male support, she ranted on until freckle face’s mugshot was also taken and the detective led both of them to the temporary cell on the court’s ground floor.

  • EFCC seizes N200m from military officers

    A Robert Egbe  in Lagos Wednesday authorised the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to seize N200 million allegedly kept in several commercial banks by two military officers and their three firms.

    Justice Sule Hassan ordered that the sum be forfeited to the Federal Government, pending the conclusion of investigation as to their origins.

    The officers are: Adamu Bello Argungu and John Onimisi Ozigi, while their firms are: Falsal & Co Global Services Nigeria Ltd; Diamond Head Ventures & Development Company Ltd; and Sweetex Bureau De Change Ltd.

    Read Also:EFCC begins investigation of Pinnick, Dikko, others

    The EFCC told the judge, through an ex parte application, that the defendants fraudulently withdrew the sum from the Defence Headquarters over-head expenses accounts.

    Its counsel, Mr. Nkereuwem Mark Anana, alleged that the sums were warehoused in five banks.

    The commission’s application, marked FHC/L/CS/1094/18, was supported by an 18-paragraph affidavit deposed to by its operative, Mr. Clever Ibrahim, two exhibits and a written address.

    Ibrahim averred that Argungu and Ozigi are of the Nigerian Army and Air Force respectively, made several unauthorised withdrawals from the Defence Headquarters Overhead Expenses Account.

    The deponent alleged that the money was neither deposited in their salary accounts, nor accounts belonging to the Defence Headquarters, but in corporate accounts and other accounts belonging their companies.

    He alleged further that although a post-no-debit order was placed on the accounts in compliance with Section 6(5) of the Money Laundering and Prohibition Act, 2011, it lapsed after 72 hours.

    Thus, the order of the interim forfeiture was sought to debar the respondents from tampering with the money.

  • ‘US refuses to release Abacha loot because it’s in dollars’

    ‘US refuses to release Abacha loot because it’s in dollars’

    The United States (US) Government has laid claim to hundreds of millions of dollars stashed abroad by the government of the late military ruler, Sani Abacha.

    The Americans allegedly told a court in an unnamed foreign country that it had an interest in the loot because it was saved in its currency, the US dollar.

    Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) and rights activist Mr Femi Falana (SAN) made the claims yesterday in Lagos.

    Malami, guest speaker Falana, Chief Chairman, Special Investigative Panel on Assets Recovery Okoi Obono-Obla, among others, were participants in a seminar organised by the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP).

    The seminar with the theme: Promoting Transparency and Accountability in the Recovery of Stolen Assets in Nigeria: Proposals for Reform, was organised in collaboration with Ford Foundation, USA.

    The AGF, who was represented by his Senior Special Assistant on White Collar Crimes, Mr Abiodun Aikomo, gave the hint of the US’ involvement in the case while condemning public officials who ferry their loot abroad.

    He said: “We have seen instances where the Federal Government of Nigeria engaged counsel to recover our stolen assets and the matter went on for many years. 

    “On the eve of a judgment, the government of a country filed an application for joinder, this was a matter that was on for seven years and judgment was going to be delivered the next day.

    “The government of the country filed, saying ‘Even though the money is not kept in our bank, even though you would think we do not have any connection with the funds, the money is in our currency and we are talking about hundreds of millions in our currency. So, if you’re moving those funds from our state, then we are interested.’

    “That was how the judgment was more or less arrested. So, the people stealing money and taking it out of Nigeria are doing us a lot of evil, because the moment the money leaves Nigeria it assumes another dimension.”

    But Falana, who accused the United States, Switzerland, the UK and other western nations of hypocritical behaviour in Nigeria’s quest to recover loot stashed in their banks, identified the US as the country concerned.

    He said: “Nigeria traced part of the Abacha loot to Jersey, an island in the United Kingdom. The Attorney-General filed a process to – by the way I was in that country when the person was convicted – the money left Nigeria through Kenya and landed in Jersey. It was from the late Abacha. 

    “Nigeria wanted to collect the remaining loot. But the United States filed an objection saying the money could not be released to Nigeria. 

    “The court asked why, the US said if the money must be released, it should be released to the US government, so that ‘we can manage it for Nigeria.’

    “The other one, $321million, Switzerland, a notorious conduit for corruption, had the temerity to say that ‘unless the World Bank is going to manage this money, we are not going to release this money.’”

    Falana urged the Federal Government not to depend on the West in its loot recovery drive.

    “The United Nations Convention Against Corruption has made adequate provisions against corruption mandating countries to assist each other but western countries have not been helping us. Our government should stop relying on the west.”

    The Silk said he had advised and the government was considering to sue foreign banks illegally holding onto funds that were stolen from Nigeria.

    He also revealed that plans were underway to seek redress for the 21 coal miners allegedly murdered by the British police under colonial rule in Nigeria, just like 

    Kenya obtained £19.4million as compensation for victims of the Mau Mau revolt against colonialism in the 50s.

    Falana said: “The British government, the British police killed 21 miners in Enugu on November 18, 1949. We are talking to the victims and their children to do what the Kenyans have done by suing the British government so that we can also begin to ask for reparation for our people.”

    Obla, who refrained from clear political comments because he had been “gagged”, said there would be no sacred cows in the quest to recover fraudulently acquired assets.

    Obono-Obla said: “Without mentioning names, we are currently investigating a director in a Federal Government ministry…We saw so much and we went to the Code of Conduct Bureau, got his asset form and discovered that a lot of companies that he has been using to make money were not mentioned in his assets declaration form. The man is in soup.”

    The Special Assistant to the President on Prosecutions vowed that the panel would not recognise any sacred cows. He urged Nigerians to assist it with information on assets procured with stolen funds. 

    “If you don’t give us information, we may not know. The panel has powers to investigate public officers in the three tiers of government: federal, state and local. No sacred cows, as far as I am concerned. We must investigate everybody. Any complaint that requires an investigation will be investigated,” Obono-Obla said.

    SERAP director Adetunbo Mumuni, who spoke earlier, praised the government for mustering the will to tackle corruption. 

    “Before President Muhammadu Buhari came, we knew there was massive corruption, but this administration has made attempts to bring corrupt people to justice,” he said.

    Other guests at the event included Amnesty International Country Director, Mrs Osai Ojigho; Department for International Development (DFID)’s Sonia Warner; and Ford Foundation’s Ms Eva Kouka and Ms Linda Ochiel, among others.

  • Prove you bought Newswatch, ex-directors tell Jimoh Ibrahim

    Prove you bought Newswatch, ex-directors tell Jimoh Ibrahim

    Three co-founders and an ex-Editor-in-Chief of Newswatch magazine have challenged billionaire businessman Jimoh Ibrahim to provide proof that he paid N510 million for 51 percent of the company’s shares.

    Ray Ekpu, Dan Agbese, Yakubu Mohammed and Soji Akinrinade claimed that the firm never issued Ibrahim share certificates or an official receipt acknowledging payment of the purchase price, “because he never paid.”

    The four non-executive directors and Ibrahim have been in a legal battle over the ownership and directorship of Newswatch.

    Last March, the Court of Appeal in Lagos set aside a 2014 Federal High Court judgment and affirmed Ibrahim as the legal owner of Newswatch.

    But the veteran journalists told The Nation on Thursday that they had challenged that judgment at the Supreme Court since last May 22.

    They said: “The share purchase price was N510 million which he was to pay not later than May 5, 2011, the date of the completion board meeting.

    “Mr. Ibrahim never paid the said N510 million before that day; he never paid it on that day and he never paid it after that day.

    “Up till today, he has not paid for the said shares. But he has tried to own the shares of a company he never paid for.”

    They stated that media interpretations of that judgment which made the rounds three days ago contained several inaccuracies.

    “The statement that ‘Ibrahim won the ownership case at a Federal High Court and the matter was re-litigated by the defendants before another Federal High Court presided over by Justice Buba who ruled in favour of Ray Ekpu, Dan Agbese, Yakubu Mohammed and others’ is false.

    “Justice Buba ruled in favour of Aminu and Aruwa. Mr. Ibrahim never won the ownership case which was at Justice Ibrahim Buba’s court.

    “What he won (which we are contesting) was the directorship case which he initiated at Justice Okon Abang’s court.

    Mr. Ibrahim could never have gone to court on ownership since he knows that he did not pay for the shares.

    “Justice Okon Abang did not state as erroneously published that ‘payment was made by Jimoh Ibrahim to the former owners of Newswatch.’ What he said was merely speculative namely that if he did not pay we would not have made him the chairman. But the truth is that he did not pay. He has no evidence of payment.”

  • Magistrate grants Atiku’s son interim custody of kids

    Magistrate grants Atiku’s son interim custody of kids

    A Tinubu Chief Magistrate ’s Court has granted Aminu Atiku, the son of former Vice President Abubakar Atiku, interim custody of his two children.

    Chief Magistrate Kikelomo Ayeye granted Aminu custody, so as to allow his daughter, Amirah, 8, and his son Amir, 6, complete their third term in their school in Lagos.

    The court ruled that both children should be in his custody for 71 days beginning from yesterday (November 1) till the day of the next hearing of the suit on January 10, 2018.

    Chief Magistrate Ayeye made the order during the continued hearing of a child custody suit filed by the children’s mother, Ms Fatima Bolori.

    The proceedings were closed to the press, but The Nation learnt that Aminu informed the court that he had paid both children’s school fees for the entire year.

    He persuaded the court to allow the kids live in his Lagos home until the next hearing of the suit.

    Chief Magistrate Ayeye, however, ordered Aminu to write a letter to the kids’ school, introducing Fatima as their mother and permitting her unfettered access to Amirah and Amir in their school, at any time of the day.

    The court directed Aminu to allow Amirah and Amir to spend weekends, public holidays, including Christmas holidays, with Fatima, whenever she was in Lagos.

    Chief Magistrate Ayeye also ordered Aminu to deposit both children’s international passports in their mother’s custody.

    The kids, who entered the courtroom at 1:28 pm in the custody of their mother, played for a few minutes with their father who arrived earlier.

    At 2:00 pm the parties moved to the judge’s chambers and hearing began.

    However, a few minutes later, Amirah walked out of the magistrate’s chambers in tears, but she was consoled by a lawyer and returned to the room.

    The case was adjourned till January 10.

    The suit, marked FCL/29/2017, was instituted by Fatima early this year seeking custody of both children.

    Fatima, daughter of Maiduguri businessman Alhaji Bukar Bolori, married Aminu in 2007 but the estranged pair are now separated.

    Last October 18, Chief Magistrate Ayeye temporarily remanded Aminu in a transit cell within the court’s premises after citing him for alleged contempt.

    Atiku allegedly kept Amir from his mother’s custody, contrary to an October 11, 2017 order.

    But the court ordered his release and dropped the contempt charge when he produced Amir in court.

  • ‘Lagos’ judiciary is Africa’s biggest’

    ‘Lagos’ judiciary is Africa’s biggest’

    A one-time President of Nigeria Bar Association (NBA), Chief Wole Olanipekun SAN has described the Lagos State Judiciary as the busiest in Africa, apart from South Africa’s.

    His comments came on the heels of Monday’s statement by Governor Akinwunmi Ambode that the state has Nigeria’s busiest and foremost judicial system.

    Olanipekun said the statistics showed that volume of cases filed in Lagos courts were unmatched by that of any African judicial system, except, perhaps, that of the Southern African country.

    He stated this on Tuesday in his keynote address ‘Promoting a pace-setting and productive judiciary in Lagos State’ during a Bar and Bench Forum, which was part of activities marking the state’s new legal year.

    The lawyer called for an urgent recruitment of more hands for the state’s judiciary, particularly on the High Court Bench, to cater for the judicial challenges facing it.

    According to him between 2015 and October 4, 2017, a total of 3548 civil and criminal cases were filed before the Lagos State High Court, while the Federal High Court Abuja had a total of 3963 cases within the same period, yet the Federal High Court has about 100 Judges as against 56 judges in Lagos.

    ‎Olanipekun, who also identified the need to stop delay in the process of swearing in the Lagos Chief Judge, charged the State Judicial Service Commission (SJSC) to rise to the task.

    “I must not be mistaken as blaming the Lagos State Chief Executive for any interregnum in the appointment of a substantive Chief Judge of Lagos in succession to the Hon. Justice Funmilayo Atilade who retired upon the attainment of the constitutional mandatory retirement age of 65 years on September 24, 2017.

    “The fact remains that the SJSC ought to have anticipated that the immediate past Chief Judge would retire on a particular day, thus initiating the process of appointment of a successor pretty early enough, to take care of submission of the name/names to the NJC, who in turn would meet to interview the nominated candidates for consequent recommendation to the Governor for appointment.”

    Lagos State Acting Chief Judge, Justice Opeyemi Oke, who chaired the event, said part of the reforms of her administration is that lawyers will now serve‎ as court registrars.

    Justice Oke said 28 legal practitioners are already undergoing training for that purpose.

    She pledged that the bad eggs tarnishing the judiciary’s image will be flushed out of the system.

    The CJ added that a committee headed by Justice Kazeem Alogba has been set up to prepare the 2018 rules of court.

  • Grandmother in court for ‘beating’ granddaughter

    Grandmother in court for ‘beating’ granddaughter

    A 45-year-old woman, Mrs Ronke Shitta, who allegedly beat up her five-year-old granddaughter with a stick was on Tuesday brought before an Ogba Magistrates’ Court, Ikeja, Lagos.
    Shitta, 45, who resides at Surulere, Lagos was arraigned before Chief Magistrate Taiwo Akanni on a one-count charge of the indecent treatment of a child.
    Prosecuting Inspector Clifford Ogu alleged that the incident occurred at her residence on July 15 at around 2:00 pm.
    Ogu said: “The grandmum indecently battered her granddaughter with a big stick, which gave her permanent marks. The neighbours said that was her usual way of beating the five-year-old girl and that she also sends her errands that were too much for her age.”
    He told the court that the incident was posted on Facebook before some concerned persons reported it to the office of Director of Public Prosecution (DPP).
    The DPP referred the matter to the Lagos State Domestic and Sexual Violence Response Team (DSVRT) which, on July 17, began the investigation.
    According to Ogu, when a DSVRT team visited the defendant’s home to rescue the child and take her into protective custody, the defendant had fled.
    The defendant’s husband, however, promised to bring her to the Gender Desk of the Police Command in Lagos the following day and he did.
    “The child was subsequently taken into protective custody,” he said.
    The alleged offence, the prosecutor added, contravened Section 135 of the Criminal Code Law of Lagos State, 2011.
    Shitta pleaded not guilty.
    Chief Magistrate Akanni granted her N100,000 bail with two sureties in the like sum.
    She adjourned till August 2, for trial.
  • Lawyers to EFCC: Name owner of seized money 

    Lawyers to EFCC: Name owner of seized money 

    Lawyers on Friday urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to name the owner of the huge sums of money found in an Ikoyi apartment.

    Constitutional lawyer and rights activist Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN) said the claim that the money belongs to the NIA was “facical”.

    He said there was no way a reasonable person would agree that an intelligence agency would hide money in an apartment.

    The SAN urged EFCC to name and shame the owners, saying someone must own the apartment.
    Ozekhome said: “We seem now fixated to name, shame and humiliate Nigerians with the paint brush of shame, odium, obloquy and denigration.

    “How can about N15billion be found in highbrow Osborne Road, Ikoyi, by no means a back squalid street? How can the equivalent of CIA, keep such hard currency in cash at an unguarded apartment, tucked away with many other apartments in a block of flats, not in a separate heavily fortified and fiercely guarded stand -alone building that has “keep off” carefully imprinted on it?

    “What was it meant for and who approved it and in which budget? Who was the whistleblower that could identify that such money was ‘hidden’ in the bedroom in flat 7A, leaving out flat 7B, yet not knowing who kept the money there or its ownership?

    “Why was EFCC not pictured or recorded on video going into the apartment, before we suddenly saw an arranged ‘counting’ of money? Are there no CCTV in such a highbrow? Can we see the footages, please?
    “Only last week, N49m orphaned sum was ‘arrested’  at Kaduna Airport! Then, suddenly another sum of orphaned N448m was ‘discovered’ in an ownerless shop in Victoria Island. Who owned the plaza? Who sold there? Are there no CCTV there? Can we see them, please?

    “The truth is that all these simulated, ‘arranged’ ‘discoveries’ can only temporarily divert attention from the hunger, squalor, fear, disease, non-performance and cluelessness of this government.

    “But, unfortunately, even lies have their expiry date. Truth is inexorable, immutable and eternal.The chicken will finally come home to roost,” Ozekhome said.

    To him, the report that the money belongs to the NIA was “farcical, heretic, total hogwash, bunkum and balderdash”.

    “Let this government and its minions credit Nigerians with some modicum of sense and capacity to reason, even with their valiant attempts to cow, browbeat and intimidate all opposition elements and critical voices in their so called corruption war.

    “At least, not even the terror halo cast on our individual and collective psyche has dulled our analytical minds.

    “The entire theatricality and Baba Sala’s Alawada Kerikeri buffoonery ought to be reserved for some circus show at the National theatre or Traffagal Square, where comedians and humour merchants entertain. The emergent facts do not show  NIA’s ownership of the money, but the grand cover-up of a serving minister’s ownership of the money.

    “It is so, so sad that all these national diversions are simply geared towards highlighting and emphasising the omnipotence and indispensability of just one man, Ibrahim Magu, as Executive Chairman of the EFCC.

    “We should build strong institutions, not strong individuals. Before Ibrahim Magu, there was a Nuhu Ribadu; there was a Mrs Waziri, and there was an Ibrahim Lamorde.

    “After Magu, there would still be another EFCC Executive Chairman. All these so-called humongous recoveries of orphaned monies are simply geared towards showcasing ineffable efficiency, effectiveness and matchless proficiency. It simply doesn’t work that war.

    “In the USA, wherefrom we borrowed our presidentialism, the equivalent agency works silently behind the scene, only seen, but never heard, except where it becomes absolutely necessary.

    “But, here in Nigeria, the EFCC engages in grotesque media trial, hifalutin and shocking disclosures of orphaned monies whose destinations after the media hype is never known.

    “Where are all the alleged recoveries of vast sums, attached properties, etc, made by the EFCC kept, and how much are they? When asked this question by the Senate during screening, Magu told a shocked and bewildered Nation he did not know!”

    Another SAN, Seyi Sowemimo, said if the money truly belongs to the NIA, the agency should come forward to explain the purpose.

    “I find it strange that a public agency like the Nigerian Intelligence Agency (NIA) would come forward and admit that it kept the money there. What could be the reason for keeping such money there? Is it in any way tied to its official duties? What was the purpose?

    “It is only when the NIA discloses this that one can know if it is concerned with its functions and I don’t know if this is something that they should do without disclosing it to maybe an institution like the Central Bank.

    “The position as I have always understood it is that you cannot keep such monies in a private residence. But I am even going beyond that in order to come to a view of the matter. It isn’t enough for the NIA to say ‘it is our money’.

    “They need to go beyond that and say whether it is in any way connected with their statutory duties and how they came about the money. Why should a minor institution like that not have the money in a bank? To me, it does not add up.

    National President, Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR), Malachy Ugwummadu, said the true owner of the money must be exposed.

    “It raises questions of the legality of warehousing those kinds of sums. If the NIA claims it owns the money, to what extent has it also explained the need for such humongous sums kept outside the banking system?
    “Was it for an operational purpose? What purpose requires those kinds of amounts and needed to be done only by the disbursement of the money in the manner that they were found?

    “When were they kept there? For how long have they been there? Who authorised them to be kept there? For what purpose? These are questions that must be answered by anyone who shows up claiming to be the owner of that kind of money.

    “Otherwise, it would raise suspicion that we are looking at a system that encourages even official financial transgressions and that supports the kind of temerity we are seeing,” Ugwummadu said.

  • ‘Arik not owing N300b’

    ‘Arik not owing N300b’

    The Association of Concerned Aviation Practitioners (ACAP) has said a claim by Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) that Arik Air has a debt profile of N300billion was untrue.

    In a statement signed by its secretary, Justin Nwokolo, ACAP said the embattled airline’s total debt, including what it owed AMCON, was less than N150billion.

    It warned of a plan by a cabal, which it promised to name in its next statement, to hijack the airline. 

    AMCON, which took over Arik last Thursday, declared on Sunday that it needed over N10billion to fix the airline. 

    But Nwokolo noted that the N10b request was made even before an audit of the airline has been carried out and that the figure was too high. 

    He said: “Within 24 hours of the hostile takeover, AMCON is saying that it needs N10billion to fix the airline.” 

    He alleged that the Arik takeover was reminiscent of AMCON’s takeover of Aero Contractors in 2012, which, according to him, left Aero in even worse debt. 

    He said: “ACAP wishes to remind the public that this same AMCON took over Aero in 2012 claiming that the airline was owing N12billion. At the time, the airline had nine aircraft and was worth far more than the alleged debt.
    “After taking over Aero, AMCON has used an additional N20billion to chase a purported N12billion debt, leaving the airline in N32billion debt hole!” 

    AMCONNwokolo said the cabal’s actions would endanger Arik’s safety record. 

    He continued: “Why are they lying that Arik Air owes N300billion when the total debt owed by airline to all vendors, including AMCON, is less than N150billion, which is less than 10 percent of the value of the airline valued at $4billion by the world renowned Delloite of London? 

    “As concerned aviation practitioners, it is our patriotic duty to ensure that this cabal that has chopped our past will not also chop our future by endangering Arik Air’s sterling record in aviation safety for the past ten years! 

    “And who says they cannot? After the hostile takeover, International Air Transport Association (IATA) has suspended Arik Air’s membership.
    “Do not be deceived. There are 28 aircraft in Arik Air’s fleet at the time when AMCON took over. Apart from the two A330 on C-Check, the two A340 on lease, two executive jets and two classics, 20 of its aircraft are flying.”
    Nwokolo also stated that the the story about Arik being on the verge of an imminent shutdown before it was taken over by the government was “a lie from the pit of hell, and even NCAA, the government regulator, can attest to this.”

  • Onnoghen urges NBA to nominate lawyers to Supreme Court

    Onnoghen urges NBA to nominate lawyers to Supreme Court

    • Nominations end on Friday

    Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Walter Onnoghen has asked the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) to nominate lawyers for appointment as justices of the Supreme Court.

    NBA has, therefore, called on lawyers to nominate suitably qualified candidates as Friday deadline rolls in.
    A January 30 “Notice to All Legal Practitioners”, signed by NBA President Abubakar Mahmoud (SAN), reads: “Pursuant to Section 231(2) of the 1999 Constitution, the Acting Chief Justice of Nigeria has invited the NBA to nominate suitably qualified legal practitioners to apply for appointment as Justice of the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
    “Interested legal practitioners are hereby required to send their hard copy profile to the following address: Nigerian Bar Association, NBA House, 8th Floor, Office of the President, Plot 1101 Cadastral Zone A00, Central Business District, Abuja, FCT.
    “Lawyers can also send their profile by email to info@nigerianbar.org.ng and info1@nigerianbar.org.ng.
    “The deadline for the submission of profile shall be on February 3rd, 2017 at 5:00 pm prompt.
    “Please take note that this notice is urgent and important and the deadline shall not be extended.”