Tag: rule

  • Rule of force

    Whenever it is parochial interest that motivates an agent of the law into wielding the law, as with a desperate act of self-preservation or affirmation, there is always a thin crossover line from the rule of law to the rule of force, which is only a short stop from the rule of lawlessness. That crossover line is most times blurred. And the dynamics hold true for executive agents of the law as for legislative or judicial agents.

    Nigeria’s national lawmakers went for broke last week, throwing in the gauntlet before the Muhammadu Buhari presidency over alleged threats to the country’s fragile democracy. The two chambers of the National Assembly hunkered down in an unprecedented closed joint session – the first time since the return of democracy in 1999 that the Senate and House of Representatives got together on any matter other than receiving the budget from the Executive arm or hosting a visiting foreign dignitary.

    Tuesday’s meeting was a panic button by the legislators who apparently were desperate for class-preservation in the face of emergent threats to institutional relevance of the National Assembly. Although they spoke of threats to the whole edifice of democracy, the threats that were immediately obvious were those posed by agents of the Executive arm to specific personalities in the NASS.

    The joint session was called on the heels of the Police citing and inviting Senate President Bukola Saraki for alleged complicity in arming suspects of the recent Offa bank robbery in which many people were killed. Prior to that citation, Saraki had raised the alarm about alleged plot by the Police to victimise him for having recently led the red chamber to declare Police Inspector-General Ibrahim Idris a democracy misfit after he repeatedly spurned purported oversight summons by the Senate. Idris had shunned the Senate’s invitations amid efforts by his agency to prosecute controversial Kogi West Senator Dino Melaye for alleged gunrunning – a case he accused the chamber of aiming to meddle in.

    There was good reason, of course, to suspect the Senate of angling for self-help in the Melaye case, considering the timing of its summons on Idris. And the red chamber apparently overreached its powers under Section 88 of the 1999 Federal Constitution in the issues it identified for the IGP’s invitation. But there’s always a challenge with anyone taking recourse to the rule of force, no matter the instigation. And so, with his arrogant rebuff of the Senate, Idris came across as less than pliant towards the rule of law and democracy tenets. Besides, his crude refusal to honour the summons, if only to indulge the legislators, located him for perception as being disposed to vindictive sleigh of hand, which lawmakers apparently see entailed now in the Police’s indictment of Saraki for the Offa robbery.

    Another seeming threat to NASS was that the Department of State Security (DSS) and the Police recently pulled a sizeable number of their operatives attached as security detail to Saraki, House of Representatives Speaker Yakubu Dogara and others in assembly leadership. Reports later said some of those operatives were restored following an intervention by Vice President Yemi Osinbajo. And that begs the question of the professional judgment that informed the initial withdrawal if the operatives could be so swiftly restored after presidential intervention – except, as it seemed, it was a willful affront by those agencies on the Legislature. Meanwhile, that isn’t counting the recent congresses of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), the outcomes of which blindsided many legislative principals among other party members.

    Still, all those issues are largely personal and should be difficult to prove as directly hazarding the health of our democracy. Without doubt, they are as well issues that perhaps betrayed disdain on the part of President Buhari for democracy’s sacred principle of separation of powers and the independence of other arms of government, in this particular case the Legislature. But they nonetheless remain issues best sorted out in personal capacities by the lawmakers affected.

    When NASS would rise from its joint session last week, however, it reached for the jugular of the Nigerian democracy, threatening to “invoke its constitutional powers” if nothing was done to address its concerns. Those were wordings that left little to doubt that the lawmakers were threatening impeachment of the president if pushed too hard.

    Apparently to win legitimacy and public sympathy for their grouse, the lawmakers made their resolutions range broadly from the self-interested to the public-spirited. These included that security agencies be given marching orders to end the killings across the country and protect lives as well as property; that alleged Executive harassment and humiliation of perceived political opponents and people with contrary views be stopped forthwith by the Police and other security agencies; that the president is accountable for the actions of his appointees and must be ready to sanction those who engage in acts that imperil democracy; that the government should show sincerity in its fight against corruption by not being selective and by prosecuting current appointees who have corruption cases pending; that the sanctity of the National Assembly should be nurtured and protected by the Executive arm; that democratic elections must be made competitive and inclusive by removing alleged reign of fear and intimidation in the build-up to the 2019 elections; and that the president must take immediate steps to contain growing unemployment and poverty in Nigeria, especially with the spot market price of crude oil now nudging $80 per barrel.

    Just so to be clear: for the model of democracy that we have chosen in this country to thrive, I am a firm believer in insular independence of the Legislature. As such, I do not share the mob cheerleading when the Executive arm under any pretext tyrannises the Legislature or indeed the Judiciary. With more than 200 years of practice under their belt, Americans only occasionally permit that the same party to control the White House and Congress at any point in time; and often, that equation changes at mid-term elections as they have coming up this November. Even while the one-party supremacy lasts, the party hardly ever has enough members to ram bills or other presidential fancies through Congress without getting the backing of some opposition members. That is the model of democracy we’ve opted to adopt in Nigeria. And that is why what we have going on in many states between governors and houses of assembly is hardly democracy practice.

    But neither is NASS’ battle cry last week also democracy. For one, the factuality of many resolutions from the joint session is highly debatable. Added to this is that the value is grossly depreciated by the fact that those resolutions were informed more by self-interest on the part of the lawmakers than by the best interest of the citizenry. With its panic recourse to self-interested rule of force, the National Assembly only further chipped away from its institutional legitimacy and actually undermined democracy practice.

    Moshood Abiola, GCFR

    Before our very eyes, the winner of the June 12 1993 presidential election has been officially crowned and the day of the election declared Nigeria’s authentic Democracy Day. Moshood Abiola got the GCFR national honour posthumously, while his running mate Babagana Kingibe and celebrated rights lawyer the late Gani Fawehinmi got the GCON honour.

    I care no hoot whether Buhari acted with an eye on 2019; what he did was long overdue and his predecessors had shied away from doing same. Former leaders had ample opportunity to ‘play politics’ by taking those decisions, but they held back.

    The point must be made that the award to Kingibe sucks, because he famously renounced the 1993 mandate even before Abiola died. Besides, there are a number of other living actors who better deserve national honours for the June 12 struggle. Still, it is gratifying that Nigeria’s history is now more accurately accounted.

     

    • Please join me on kayodeidowu.blogspot.be for conversation.
  • Why violence rule our world

    SIR: It hasn’t been long since a lot of us finally got our lives back—after enduring the massive media hype that surrounded the fight between Conor McGregor and Floyd Mayweather. Just like every other boxing match, it’s always a memorable night of having two consenting adults punch each other silly in the ring—until it gets to the fun part when one of them is lucky to unleash a knockout blow to the head of their opponent. Isn’t that always a delightful sight for boxing fans?

    Violence is a strong part of human character. While some people act on it, others think about it, and some others take delight in watching it get under way. No matter how much we evolve our minds or cloak ourselves in the best clothing, the savage nature in every human being lies in wait, and can be triggered the moment a perfect opportunity presents itself.

    The most successful films are fast turning out to be the violent ones. A lot of viewers will rarely find a movie that doesn’t involve elements of shooting, killing—and a fancy bit of martial arts interesting. Kids on the other hand, learn to enjoy the art of savagery through ‘kid-friendly’ cartoons. While a child awaits adolescence—when TV restrictions aren’t often imposed, the child momentarily makes do with the funny but extremely cruel things ‘Tom and Jerry’ do to each other. Isn’t it interesting how kids giggle in amusement whenever rival cartoon characters give each other an agonizing experience?

    American Football (NFL), is one of the many interesting sports in the United States. Among the numerous reasons why it is loved, the violent thrill of the sport outranks them all. In Nigeria, it’s fast becoming a social convention to ensure roadside thieves are lynched and burned alive publicly. How such barbaric acts are easily carried out by fellow human beings, terrifies me deeply. The same can be said for the weirdos who mutilate human body parts for voodoo rituals.

    Religion, tribal sentiments and politics incites people, but our savage human nature engineers the violence associated with extremism. Nations are driven into senseless wars by the bloodthirsty savage nature of men. Domestic violence, rape, robbery, brutal killings by people who look quite squeaky clean—and our desires for violent sports, movies or games, are all various degrees of savagery.

    With the acquisition of nuclear weapons by the world powers and their rival prodigies, the world can be likened to a ticking time bomb!

    Although, we’ve got a great deal of monstrous traits in us, if we can all tame ourselves—and pretend some more to be civilized, the world could be a little safer.

     

    • Nimi Princewill,

    princewill.nimi@yahoo.com

  • Respecting rule of law

    It is no longer news that President Muhammadu Buhari has again left the shores of this country, precisely on May 7, to follow up on his medical consultation with his doctors in the United Kingdom (UK). But what has marvelled some Nigerians was how he has again shown his full respect for the provisions of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The President had not only transmitted a letter to the two chambers of the National Assembly intimating them of his need to leave the country to keep the appointments with his doctors in the UK, but he also made it clear that Vice President Yemi Osinbajo should coordinate activities of governance in his absence in line with Section 145 (1) of the 1999 Constitution.

    A copy of the letter as read by the Senate President Bukola Saraki, on the floor of the Upper Chamber last Tuesday reads: “In compliance with Section 145 {1) of the 1999 constitution as amended, I wish to inform the distinguished Senate that I will be away for a scheduled medical follow-up with my doctors in London.

    “The length of my stay will be determined by the doctor’s advice.”

    The letter had immediately stirred up controversy in the Senate as a lawmaker raised a point of order trying to fault the failure of the President to expressly state that Vice President Yemi Osinbajo will be the ‘Acting President ‘ in his absence.

    The lawmaker had thought that the use of the word ‘coordinate’ would impede the Acting President from fully discharging his duties in the absence of the President.

    To him,  the word ‘coordinate ‘ would make it mandatory for the Acting President to first consult with other top government officials before taking a decision on an issue.

    The Senate Leader, Senator Ahmad Lawan had immediately countered the lawmaker.

    He pointed out that the use of the word ‘coordinate’ and non-use of ‘Acting President’ in the letter are immaterial as long as the President had said he was handing over the reins of power in line with Section 145 (1) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

    According to him, the Section had made it clear that the Vice President will act in the absence of the President.

    The Section reads “Whenever the president transmits to the president of the Senate and the speaker of the House of Representatives a written declaration that he is proceeding on vacation or otherwise that he is unable to discharge the functions of his office, until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such function shall be discharged by vice president as acting president.”

    It was also good that the Senate President immediately rose to the occasion and resolved the matter before it could get out of hand.

    Saraki had declared: “I think that it is clear, the letter has referred to the Constitution and there is no ambiguity in the Constitution. So, I don’t think there is any issue there.”

    He immediately declared Osinbajo as Acting President.

    Many Nigerians on the social media also did not take kindly to the perceived or real attempt at what they considered as calculated effort to prevent the Vice President from functioning fully as Acting President.

    A stalwart of the opposition party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Femi Fani-Kayode, had tweeted on his Twitter handle, “The attempt by the corpsocrats to prevent the VP from being Acting Pres. by referring to him as a “co-ordinator” is insulting and dangerous.”

    Besides many lawyers in the country also stressing that the President’s letter was sufficient to make Osinbajo Acting President, the Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed, had said that the controversies were needless distractions.

    “ýIt’s a needless controversy, it’s just a distraction, the operating sentence is that in compliance of Section 145(1), any other word used is not relevant.” he noted

    Some Nigerians however have also not seen anything wrong with the lawmaker raising the point of order on the floor of the Senate.

    According to them, it has made things clearer for those in government that might have misunderstood the wordings of the lletter the other way.

    With the controversy behind, some Nigerians have continued to celebrate President Buhari as a true democrat and a respecter of the rule of law.

    They were surprised that the President, who had military training and background, could demonstrate utmost respect for the rule of law, even more than some past Presidents who had no military background..

    According to them, Buhari had never failed to handover reigns of power to his deputy whenever proceeding on medical vacation.

    One of such Nigerians who stormed the Presidential Villa last Tuesday was the National Coordinator of the Emerging Leaders’ Forum, Alhaji Aminu Balele Kurfi.

    He specifically comme-nded President Buhari for transmitting power to the Vice President, Yemi Osinbajo bef-ore embarking on the medical trip.

    Stressing that Nigerians need not make issues out of the trip because the health of the President, he prayed for the President’s speedy recovery.

    That’s exactly the prayers on the minds of well-meaning Nigerians so that the President can return to finish what he started.

    They are still anxiously awaiting the change of a better Nigeria.

  • Let’s play by the rule, says Abraham

    Let’s play by the rule, says Abraham

    All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship aspirant Dr. Segun Abraham has appealed to other aspirants to play by the rules at the primary holding on Saturday.

    Abraham warned that circumventing the rules guiding the primary would jeopardise the party’s victory during the November 26 poll.

    The APC chieftain stated this in a statement signed by the Director of Media and Publicity of his campaign organisation, Sayo Aluko, in Akure, the state capital.

    Abraham said the party supremacy and the rules guiding the conduct of the primary  would douse the tension triggered by the fear of imposition.

    He said APC, being a party  that has enormous respect for the rule of law, must set a good example for the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) by holding a transparent primary.

    He described  aspirants, who are still nursing the fear of imposition, in spite of the assurances from the zonal and national leaders as pretenders, as politicians without electoral value.

    Abraham lamented the contempt by some aspirants for the leaders of the party in recent times, saying such an act was capable of  portraying the party as a haven of rascals and belligerent people, who have no modicum of respect  for party supremacy.

    He added: “The APC is a party of light and it has become a pacesetter in the political history of our dear nation by being the first party to present a presidential candidate that defeated an incumbent president, I mean President Muhammadu Buhari.

    “Voting for us was as a result of the qualities they see in our members as being better off, in terms of organization, respect for party supremacy and the rule of law. We should not be seen as a bunch of rascals. We should not be desperate or exhibit actions that could make the PDP better than us in the eyes of Nigerians.

    “The conduct of primary is simply the task of a political party, which should be a family affair rather than a war- like affair that some of the aspirants have been portraying the situation in our party to be.

    “It is disheartening that some of our aspirants, who should be seen as role models decided to throw caution to the winds over rumour that certain candidate was about to be imposed. This is mischievous and highly disappointing.”

  • Chibok Girls: Time to break the rule

    The latest video released by Boko Haram showing a section of the missing Chibok girls should serve as incentive for deeper introspection. At the official level, perhaps the moment has come to rethink a counter strategy that increasingly looks impotent, if not suspect; even as public communication is weaned of words that now sound more like broken record.

    In the eleven-minute-long recording, the Abubakar Shekau-led faction unambiguously restated its old demand that its members held across the country be released as pre-condition for the release of the over 200 remaining Chibok girls. As usual, a masked guy (Shekau?) in military fatigue is shown blustering beside the girls who look expressionless in hijab against an eerie black backdrop.

    No prize for guessing the possible motives behind Shekau’s latest stunt. Like any movement not inspired by an enduring or lofty value, the accursed Boko Haram (BH) is obviously already choking on its grotesque contradictions. With ISIS seeking to disrobe him by naming Abu Musab al-Barnawi as the new leader, it is evident the bloodthirsty fugitive is desperate for a pitch to demonstrate his nuisance value to the Nigerian authorities.

    True, hostage-taking in Nigeria did not start in April 2014 with the Chibok girls. But with the twists and turns witnessed in the past 28 months, this should be the most dramatized in human history. It is like a slow-motion horror movie. The spectacle of aggrieved mothers fellowshipping periodically, holding vigil, at a hearing distance from Aso Rock gates in Abuja has become a constant source of national embarrassment.

    Well, we are free to elect to live blissfully in denial by conveniently making generous allowance for Shekau’s blustering in the latest video and the possible exaggerations – like claims that Nigeria’s airstrike had killed many of the girls. But the next footage in the flick should be enough to sting us back to cold reality: the face and voice of one of the captives, Dorcas Yakubu.

    Speaking both Hausa and her native Kibaku in a voice that strikingly sounds accustomed to the tragic fate she and others find themselves, the teenager urged parents to “be patient and beg the government to release their people, so that we’ll also be released.”

    Caught between joy at a proof their daughter is still alive and sorrow at the thought of the unthinkable she must have endured in the past 28 months, Dorcas’ parents, Mr. & Mrs. Kabu Yakubu, could only afford to make a loud sigh in Abuja after watching the new video. Their testimony: “We cried when we saw our daughter but we’ll sleep better now.”

    They spoke from the very depth of anguish every true parent will feel.

    For others who could not see or hear their loved ones, the nightmare obviously continues.

    Today, what however remains unknown is if, beyond the mouthing of platitudes and shedding of crocodile tears, anyone in Abuja truly feels the kind of soul-wrenching pain parents of the Chibok girls have endured in the past 28 months to want to literally move mountains to free the captives.

    The dumbest apology to give today is to say Buhari is ready to negotiate with BH but is handicapped over which faction to talk to. Unless the government wants us to believe its intelligence-gathering capacities and capabilities are dead and so now fit only for the cemetery.

    Legion stories are told of how western nations like Britain had passed credible intelligence to the Jonathan administration on the precise location of the Chibok girls earlier in the day but, as usual, it refused to lift a finger until it became too late. In fact, one account states that the girls were initially camped on the other side of the river for several days in April 2014 without any intervention by the authorities until they were presumably herded deep into the dreaded Sambisa forest.

    But lamenting missed opportunities is no longer defensible today. What we want now is result by any means necessary, realizing that each passing day means a continuation of their abuse in captivity.

    Elsewhere in the west, the mere echo of Mr. & Mrs. Yakubu’s words, to say nothing of the sheer spectacle of their presence, would be enough to drive leaders into extra-ordinary exertions with a view to liberating citizens so held in bondage, anywhere. In the circumstance, such leaders begin to pick and choose sections of the Geneva Convention to obey.

    Officially, the tendency is for western nations to openly pontificate that ransom-payment in turn fuels terrorism. That cash paid is soon invested by the receivers to buy new weapons and finance training. But unofficially, countries like Italy, Germany, France and Spain are known to have paid ransoms through private companies to free their nationals from terrorists, convinced that the end ultimately justifies the means.

    UK, for instance, is known to turn a blind eye if relations or companies slipped cash to have their loved ones freed. That was how Judith Tebbuth’s release was secured in 2012. In 2014, the same tactic was employed to secure the release of teacher David Bolam from the clutches of ISIL in Libya.

    Same year in the US, the Obama administration swapped five Al-Qaeda suspects held at the Guantanamo detention facility for one American soldier, Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, after five years in captivity, whipping the sentiment of an ironclad commitment “to leave no man or woman in uniform behind on the battlefield”. Washington engaged the government of Qatar as the go-between in the indirect negotiations.

    Decades earlier, the Reagan administration did something far more unorthodox to free seven US hostages held by Iranian terrorists in Lebanon. Despite subsisting arms embargo against Tehran, Washington opted to sell arms secretly to Iran during its war with Iraq in a complicated covert deal that soon birthed the Iran-Contra scandal. Once the illicit cargoes began to berth in Tehran, three of the US hostages in Beirut were let off, though three more were taken in what a Washington top official later described cynically as “hostage bazaar”.

    More filth surfaced in 1986 after a Lebanese newspaper blew the whistle on the secret deal. Not only was Reagan exposed, it was also discovered that only $12m out of the expected $30m had reached government coffers. It soon came to light that the balance had been diverted to fund the contra rebels being propped by Washington to combat the communist government in Nicaragua since the US congress had outlawed such direct monetary aid through formal channel.

    To be fair, President Buhari only inherited the Chibok girls issue. Still, the government deserves credit for rallying a relentless campaign against BH in the past fifteen months so much that relative peace has now returned to the hitherto beleaguered North-East, even as it is left to face a huge refugee crisis. But to suggest that the war is now totally over as the military high command is wont to claim lately with the over 200 Chibog girls still unaccounted for is to miss the human angle to the historic tragedy.

    One lesson the Buhari people appear not to have learnt from the Jonathan mishap is rehashing the same rhetoric each time the Chibok girls question is raised. The other day the Information Minister reassured that the government was still on top of the situation. Well, Lai Mohammed just said what is expected of him. Really, no one can say the president has forgotten the Chibok girls. After all, he gave a plum appointment to one of the conveners of the BringBackOurGirls Group. And since Ms. Hadiza Usman assumed duties as the Managing Director of the Nigerian Ports Authority, at least one of the eloquent BBOG voices has since become muted. Even if she is not too engrossed sorting cargoes at the Lagos ports to forget or have time to attend the BBOG fellowships in Abuja, her presence there today will certainly be incongruous.

    Really, what the aggrieved parents desire and indeed deserve is not just tons of nice words from Mohammed. If truly the government is quietly moving mountains to get the girls released, it ought to device an effective channel the information is shared with the traumatized. Had this been the case, it is doubtful if Oby Ezekwesili and other committed activists will continue to speak so bitterly each time they congregate at the Unity Square in Abuja.  But for the uncommon patriotic zeal of these volunteers, perhaps the memory of the abducted would have long faded, if not totally extinguished, by now.

    Again, whoever counseled the Army authorities to publicly declare wanted last Sunday three individuals known to have links with Boko Haram did the nation a disservice. If the measure was intended to project the authorities as being proactive, it has surely backfired. For no sooner had the announcement been made than the duo of Mrs. Aisha Wakil (aka Mama Boko Haram) reported at the Defence Headquarters in Abuja and lawyer Ahmed Bolori turned himself in at the Army Headquarters in Maiduguri. Journalist Ahmad Salkida expressed willingness to travel down from his Dubai base once he receives ticket fare.

    Mama Boko Haram, for instance, soon expressed disgust that the Army could go ahead and declare her wanted like a fugitive when, according to her, they knew her address and how to reach her.

    The Army spokesman later explained that the trio were invited out of a belief that they knew more than they were willing to share vis-a-vis the location of the abducted. A claim the accused did not deny. From the utterances of Mrs. Wakil and Bolori after meeting with the military authorities, it would appear they are more than willing to be engaged in the search to rescue the missing girls. The trio is not alone. A serving senator, Shehu Sani, is also known to have links with the BH leaders. Rather than alienate or demonize them, such individuals ought to be co-opted into the search for the missing girls as a matter of national urgency.

    In the unlikely event that all the remaining captives are being assembled in one location, given the young lives involved, let it however be stressed that no one is advocating a re-enactment of the daring Entebbe raid of 1976 when Israeli commandos stormed Uganda’s International Airport in Kampala to free 100 of their nationals being held hostage by pro-Palestinian gunmen. After a 35-minute fire-fight, the toll exacted was not only heavy in human but also in material terms: three hostages lay dead beside seven hijackers, twenty Ugandan troops and the leader of the invading unit, Lt. Colonel Yonatan Netanyahu (brother of future Israeli Prime Minister). Completely wrecked also were eleven Russian-built MiG fighters of the Ugandan Air Force.

    Nor can anyone afford a repeat of the Moscow solution applied in Russia in October 2002 following the hijack of a theatre by some 50 Chechen rebels. A record 700 theatre-goers were taken hostage. After a 57-hour-standoff at the Palace of Culture, the Russian special forces who had surrounded the hall were at their wits’ end. In what became one if the worst rescue operations in history, they resorted to the quick fix by simply lobbing a pipe into the hall through which a lethal narco gas was discreetly sprayed. By the time the fume settled, no fewer than 120 hostages and most of the militants had been wasted.  The official defense was that gassing was the most prudent option in the circumstance to disarm the militants before they had time to detonate their explosives.

    In the two foregoing scenarios, the casualty toll was quite heavy. While no one will at this point prescribe a similar raid on the location where the Chibok girls might be kept, several other options remain open to Abuja with a view to quickly bringing a closure to what has clearly become one of the darkest chapters in the nation’s history. Swapping, as already mooted by the affected, is not a bad idea.

    In case President Buhari is still unaware, the hour has finally come to bring back our girls.

  • Rule or ruse  of law?

    Rule or ruse of law?

    With the nation’s mighty and powerful being hauled one after the other before the courts to account their share of the bazaar called armsgate, one of the more positive dimensions to the onslaught on vice in high places must be the current move from the asinine debate about the absolute right of an alleged felon to hop on the plane for a medical appointment in some foreign capitals to the centrality of law in the entire process.

    Now, thanks to President Muhammadu Buhari’s spectacular gaffe in his maiden media chat, the fangled phrase, rule of law has suddenly gained elevation – I daresay, not so much because some Nigerians – in their love for cant – are necessarily firm believers in the concept, but because some have found in it an opportunity to do what they do best – talk!

    Obviously, you won’t be a Nigerian if you don’t have one or two things to say on the current developments. As a matter of fact, I wager to say that Nigerians would have found something else to talk about had the President not flown off the handle at the media chat. If it seems a measure of their so-called indignation that they have been talking since, it is also moot point that Nigerians aren’t so much agreed on the definition let alone the strategy to fight the monster called corruption!

    No question about it – President Buhari goofed – big time. It is after all elementary that the law presumes an offender innocent until the state successfully proves its case in the court of law. His reference to the “atrocities people like Dasuki committed” on the basis of which he believes he should not be entitled to bail is as absurd as it is untenable. The same also applies to the case of Nnamdi Kanu – the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) – standing trial for treasonable offences. Surely, the President has no business speaking condescendingly on any citizen let alone determining their guilt before the full course of trial. For many, the two cases – you can add the Shiites crisis in Kaduna as the third – are sufficient to detract from the administrations rule of law armour.

    I beg to disagree. To reduce the war to the President’s sin of indiscretion is certainly taking things a bit too far. Once again, I am forced to draw upon the example of an accident scene. In the typical bedlam, whereas the milder cases are often the loudest in their shrill cries to draw attention to themselves, the trained medic is careful to isolate those lying still –ostensibly because they have little or no energy to draw upon – for urgent attention.

    It is no accident that the rule of law has suddenly become handy in the current circumstances. If it seems by far more tolerable to present as alibi than the unending dog-fights over the seizure of international passports which comes to the right to travel abroad to receive some specialised medical treatments, its seduction, to be sure, would lie its universal appeal and its inviolability – something resonates more with the lawyers, the populace and the international community.

    But then, this is precisely the part that I am worried about. Of course, we know the pathology of the powerful. They are not just contented with breaking the law, neither are they averse to twisting the law in such ways and manner as to defeat the course of justice. What about their penchant to undermine the judicial system? Have we not seen a counsel lampoon a judge in an open court only for the same counsel to turn round to ask the luckless judge to recuse himself from the case since he could no longer be trusted to be unbiased after insulting his lordship? That is the level of delinquency to which the judiciary has sunk. Today, we know that a clever attorney and a letter from a foreign infirmary are significant steps to freedom from the rigours of trial and defeat for the justice system.  Ours is a clime where those with the means can literally procure the licence to kill. In any case, such are not supposed to be a problem – or are they?

    Suddenly, with a fresh breeze of change, we are told that the powerful cannot bear to suffer the allergy of minor irritations that attenuate the justice delivery system! That is bunkum. The same men who allegedly despatched others to their untimely deaths; the individuals who acts of omission and commission are alleged to have rendered millions homeless cannot bear to spend the harsh harmattan weather away from their loved ones! What about those who converted the parastatals in their charge to piggy banks to dispense all manners of favours? And now to imagine that the rest of us, no less victims of their avarice and greed –being enlisted in their orchestra of shame!

    I am of course for the rule of law. It is important to regulate the behaviour of different actors in the polity. The chant at the moment is unfortunately, an elite pastime aimed at promoting the false choice between the rule and the ends of justice. The point remains that while the rule must avail for the accused to make his demands within the ambits of the law; it should be no less for the investigators to do their jobs– also within the ambits of the same law – unfettered. That this can come with some minor irritations should not suffice for the clamour to bring the roof down on everyone heads!

    Again, the point is – while the brazen violations of the rule of law are intolerable any day, those who seek to erect their fangled concept on the foundations of anomie are welcome to their illusion that the path leads anywhere else than one of societal disintegration. Surely, that is not what we want – or is it?

  • ‘How we want Ooni to rule’

    ‘How we want Ooni to rule’

    As the His Royal Majesty, Oba Adeyeye Ogunwusi, ascends the throne today, much is expected of him. Some kingmakers speak with Chief Correspondent ADEDEJI ADEMIGBUJi on the challenges the monarch will have to tackle.

    We will not betray him’

    “We the king 16 Kingmakers will rule with the new Ooni. He will share his plans and ideas with us before he makes decision. With him, we will look for a peaceful resolution of crisis and issues and we will not betray him”-His Royal Highness, Ijio of Moore, Ile-Ife,  Yaya Elugbaju.

    ‘He must not favour any particular religion’

    “Our new King in Council, Oba Ogunwusi, is a civilized king and he will bring this to grow the economy of Ile-Ife but he must not favour a particular religion. He must practice every religion and also preserve tradition”- the head of the Kingmakers, Lowa Adimula of Ile, His Royal Highness, Joseph Olasoji Ijaodola.

    ‘He should not undermine kingmakers’

    “My advice is that the new God should put God first. He should not undermine the kingmakers. He should have the proverbial ear for getting information and he should not base his decision on one side,”- His Royal Highness, Jaaran Adimula of Ile-Ife, Oba Adeyeye Adekola Abraham

    ‘He brings wisdom from Heaven’

    “If God makes a man an Ooni, his wisdom comes from heaven. He becomes a demigod and we the kingmakers will always be around him and must not leave him,” His Royal Highness, Ilaran of Ilode of Ife, Oba Saka Kolawole.

    ‘Ooni must not destroy our culture’

    “Our culture is very dear to us and the king must do everything to protect it. It is the foundation of Ife and what makes the entire Yoruba race at home, Diaspora trace their root”-His Royal Highness, Jagun Ise of Ile-Ife, Johnson Omotoyosi

    ‘No prejudice in community crisis resolution’

    “The new Ooni is the chairman of the Kingmakers and we the 16 kingmakers bring issues from our various communities to him. We will experience a new atmosphere and a new dawn. He will ensure that issues are addressed without any biase or prejudice for the sake of peaceful co-existence.”-His Royal Highness, Arode of Ile-Ife, J.A Awe

    ‘We did not favour anyone’

    “In the Gazzette, it is the turn of Giesi. No one was cheated. We the kingmakers didn’t turn the table to favour anyone. The new king is educated and he will cooperate with us for the growth of the source”-His Royal Highness, Waso of Ilare, Olasode Akinropo

    ‘Ooni must put an end to our sufferings’

    “We want Ife to be great again. We’re suffering in silence in Ile-Ife. His agenda should be towards bringing Ife back to life. People say we are the source but we don’t have what is takes to be the source”-His Royal Highness, Iranye of Alaye, Alfred Olubunmi Elufade

  • CBN’s new rule book

    CBN’s new rule book

    •What matters most is not the rule, but its enforcement

    Last week, the media reported a set of fresh-mint regulations being proposed by the apex bank to protect bank customers from exploitation by banks. The draft regulations, said to be currently under consideration by the stakeholders, is as detailed and comprehensive as it could be –a rule book– a rather ambitious attempt to re-order and or erect a new operational and ethical foundation for the industry.

    Among many, it starts with the broad goal for the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) – which is to “ensure that operators (banks) establish structures to prohibit predatory lending and hence support a positive credit culture in the industry”; for financial operators, it spells out its role in “credit counselling to prevent consumers’ indebtedness due to limited financial knowledge” as well as disseminate information on the existence of the services while also encouraging them to take advantage of them. It also wants lenders to “provide detailed information on the terms and conditions of a loan agreement to consumers prior to executing the loan agreement”. This must include the “pricing, repayment schedule, repayment amount, tenure and opt out options”.

    On the thorny issue of loan recovery, whereas the CBN is to set guidelines for ethical debt collection practices in the industry based on “dialogue, respect for the consumers’ privacy and longevity of consumer-operator relationships amongst others”, actual debt recovery processes, the rule prescribes, must be courteous, fair and non-coercive. Moreover, personnel assigned to recover debts are expected to be properly trained while consumers shall be informed in advance before a recovery process is initiated.

    In case of contract variations, operators are expected to give prior notice to consumers within the time specified in contracts, before implementing variations in terms and conditions of contracts. Contractual language, it proposes, must be “precise, clear and unambiguous”. “Information”, in all cases, “must be communicated in plain and simple language to limit the possibility of misinterpretation. Contract documents must be in legible font size. Where technical terms are used, the financial operator shall take due care to ensure that such technical terms are clearly explained to the understanding of the consumer to avoid the occurrence of confusion or miscommunication”.

    To generate increased business volumes or attract new customers, financial operators are mandated to “provide factual information and shall not seek to mislead consumers. Financial operators shall also not take advantage of consumers’ inexperience, gullibility or lack of understanding”.

    These are just a few of the many provisions of the new rules.

    We observe primarily that the rules are not necessarily novel or even different, at least in any fundamental sense, from the well-known conventions that have evolved over the course of the years and which have come to govern the operations in the financial services industry globally. That our practitioners have been carrying on in the absence of a codified body of guiding rules for financial service providers; the very idea that such important rules are only being set out in the form that is being proposed by the apex bank given the state of development in the industry is not only incongruous but unsettling. Indeed, it may well serve to explain a number of the puzzles that have hobbled the industry, factors that have rendered the goal of financial inclusion for majority a non-starter. Need we further ask why consumers of financial products are constantly treated to the short end of the stick; or question the arbitrariness that has characterised relations between service provider and the consumer, not to talk of the brazen criminality that some of these factors have given rise to?

    We must however say that rules are important only to the extent that they are kept. The challenge really is getting the operators to obey them. In other words, the true test of the effectiveness of the rules would come later when practitioners are seen to abide by them. At the moment, we can only say of the proposed regulations: better late than never.

  • Rule with fear of God,  Anglican diocese urges leaders

    Rule with fear of God, Anglican diocese urges leaders

    The Diocese of Omu-Aran, Anglican Communion has asked leaders to rule with the fear of God as well as initiate and implement masses-oriented programmes.

    The Diocese said elected leaders must work hard to justify the confidence reposed in them to remain worthy before men and God.

    The church stated these in a communiqué at the end of third session of the second synod of the diocese.

    The communiqué was signed by the Diocesan Bishop, Rt Rev. Philip Adeyemo and chairman, Communiqué Committee,

    Mr. J.S. Bamigboye (SAN).

    It lauded the federal government for its anti-corruption and

    anti-terror efforts and urged it not to relent.

    It also decried the deaths of Muslims pilgrims during the stampede at Mecca and pleaded with the Saudi Arabia authorities to avoid a repeat of the tragedy.

    The synod also urged Kwara State Governor Abdulfatah

    Ahmed to concentrate efforts on the development of rural areas to enhance adequate food production and create jobs for the jobless youths.

    It also called on the state government to improve the salaries of teachers and civil servants.

    The communiqué said: “The Synod notes that a strong weapon in our bid to stamp out corruption is by compelling public officers to make their declaration of assets open to the public for general scrutiny.

    “It commends the worthy examples of the President and his vice and enjoins others to follow suit.

    “The Synod notes with concerns the call for fresh National Conference by ex-political office holders under the Northern Re-Awakening Forum.

    “Rather the Synod calls on the Federal Government to implement the Report of the 2014 national conference in which about 500 eminent Nigerians participated. The implementation will assuage all grey areas militating against our unity as a nation.”

  • Umana: APC ’ll rule Akwa Ibom

    Umana: APC ’ll rule Akwa Ibom

    The people of Akwa Ibom gave the All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship candidate, Umana Umana, a hero’s welcome when he returned to Uyo, the state capital, last week. Correspondent Kazeem Ibrahym captures their excitements and hope for power shift.

    Where was an upsurge in the broom revolution recently when the All Progressives Congress (APC) governorship candidate, Umana Umana returned home to a rousing welcome last week.

    As early as 11am, Akwa Ibom people in their thousands had thronged the Ibom International Airport to await the arrival of Umana. The car lots at the airports could not contain thousands of cars. The car lots were filled to the brim with different armanda of car brands.

    Tricycles operators, otherwise known as the Keke Napep, who naturally do not ply the airport, were also in their thousands, they parked their tricycles outside to wait for Umana and other APC stalwarts.

    The atmosphere at the airport became electrified with different women groups, students and youths from different local government areas in the state. Some of them sat on the floor. They held brooms, the symbol of the party. The women also entertained themselves with different array of local music.

    The suspense grew among APC supporters each time a flight touched down at the airport; the crowd would rush to see if it was Umana’s flight. The Police had difficulties in controlling the crowd that wanted to catch a glimpse at Umana and other APC chieftains.

    Umana’s chartered flight with registration number 5N-BMH finally touched down at the airport at exactly 3:45pm from Abuja. His arrival ended the long period of wait by the APC supporters. Umana was with his wife, Mrs. Florence, his running mate, Mr. Benedict Ukpong and his spouse, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters, Sen. Ita Enang, a former deputy governor, Nsima Ekere, Umana’s campaign Director-General, Soni Udom and a host of other party stalwarts.

    From the airport down to Uyo, the state capital, APC supporters were seen brandishing brooms, the symbol of the party. The supporters were led by tricycles operators. The tricycles operators in their hundreds led the way to escort Umana’s convoy to the Nsima Ekere Campaign Organization complex located at Gen. Edet Akpan Avenue (four lane), Uyo, where Umana and other dignitaries were billed to address the APC supporters on the outcome of the judgment of Justice Sadiq Umar-led panel. There

    There was traffic gridlock along the Oron road. The massive crowd lined along the road with broom in their hands. Some symbolically sweeping what they termed the decadent and alleged corrupt PDP brigands out of town.

    On arrival at the venue, the crowd struggled among themselves to catch a glimpse at Umana and other APC chieftains. Two former Local Government Chairmen for Uyo and Itu, Ekerete Ekpenyong and Michael Etim a.k.a Mac Joe also joined the teeming APC supporters.

    The duo served under former Governor Akpabio and incumbent Governor Udom Emmanuel. Their presence at the welcome reception for Umana ended months of speculation on whether or not they are APC members. The duo told the APC supporters that it won’t be business as usual, that the people should be given the opportunity to choose their leader.

    According to Ita Awak, the APC  Publicity Secretary, he explained that despite short notice, Akwa Ibom people came out in their large numbers to welcome Umana and other party chieftains.

    He said: “We were overwhelmed and profoundly heartened by the voluntary mammoth turnout to welcome and receive Umana Okon Umana and to listen and take to heart his reassuring messages. We deeply felt the outpouring of pure affection and love and hope by numberless thousands of Akwa Ibom elders, leaders, stakeholders, men, women, students and youths who assembled at Obong Nsima Ekere Campaign grounds of their own free will and without any promise or expectation of receiving any monetary gratification.

    “Akwa Ibom people came out to hear Umana Okon Umana because they didn’t like the timid verdict of the election tribunal; because they are sick and tired of the serial lies of the PDP government looters of our treasury. Akwa Ibom people came out to hear the voice of hope and the promise for a safer, more inclusive society.”

    Addressing the crowd at the Nsima Ekere Campaign Organization complex, the Senior Special Assistant to the President on National Assembly Matters, Senator Ita Enang, threw the first salvo. He declared Governor Udom Emmanuel as illegal governor. He said the election that brought Mr. Emmanuel into government was not valid.

    Enang, who read Section 179 subsection 1 of the Constitution to the APC supporters, said Akwa Ibom governor failed to satisfy the 2/3 majority votes as required by the Constitution.

    He said: “I want to say that we have come to announce that we have obtained victory and the tribunal has decided that the election that brought in the PDP is incorrect, incomplete, illegal and they are not in government. I have brought a copy of the Constitution which says and confirms that there is no proper government in Akwa Ibom state as at today.

    “Since 2/3 of 31 is 21 and election in 18 local government areas have been cancelled, so election that brought in the PDP was not a valid election. So there is no proper government in Akwa Ibom state. The election stands annulled. We shall pursue to the end.”

    Umana in his speech said he was overwhelmed by the support of the Akwa Ibom people and promised not to let them down.

    But, before addressing the people, Umana asked that a minute silence be observed in honour of victims of election violence in the state. He explained that his party decided to appeal the judgment by the governorship tribunal in honour of those slain at polling units across the state in the course of exercising their civic responsibility.

    Umana said: “Also, we are appealing because we are hopeful. We trust in God and know that the judiciary will give the people of Akwa Ibom justice. I believe that at the Appeal Court we will succeed so that we can have 31 over 31.  I thank God because change is coming and I want to thank you for your resilience. You have gone through pain, you have sacrificed so much. It has not easy”, he said.

    The APC governorship candidate added, “I thank you for your resilience; I couldn’t have done it without the people of Akwa Ibom behind me. I assure you that very soon, God will liberate Akwa Ibom from impunity, oppression and imposition. A state that has been so blessed by God, why should our people suffer so much? You must have your own governor.”

    In his address, Ekere called on Akwa Ibom people to reject a packaged governor. Ekere thanked the people for coming out enmasse to receive the harbinger of change in the person of Umana.

    He stated that today, the unprecedented tribunal judgment had vindicated him for leading 21 aggrieved Akwa Ibom sons and daughter to demand for the inalienable right of the people to choose their governor.

    Ekere said: “I thank the judiciary for that unprecedented judgment and I’m certain that with the ongoing legal process the sham election will be cancelled and Akwa Ibom people will eventually choose their governor.

    “Illegal occupant of the government house is going to be chased out. Every Akwa Ibom citizens will say who they want as their governor.”

    For the Chairman of APC, Dr. Amadu Atai, he expressed gratitude to the party faithful and teeming supporters of change across the state. He however pointed out that Akwa Ibom people do not want a ‘packaged and imported’ governor, but a true son of the soil, who has been home grown and understands the needs of the people.

    His words: “Never again shall we allow anybody to use impunity on us and trample of us. We want re-run election in the 31 Local Government Areas.”