On 24 February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine in a major escalation of the Russia-Ukrainian War, which had started in 2014. AYOOLUWA AYOBAMI reviews the voting pattern which seeks an end to the conflict.
The unexpected siding of the United States with Russia at the United Nations (UN) on two key votes, as regards the Russia-Ukraine war, reflects substantial changes in the United States foreign policy, especially during the present administration of President Donald Trump.
This shift is marked by the U.S. rejecting a UN General Assembly resolution that condemned Russia’s military actions in Ukraine, a position backed by European nations.
Instead, the U.S. proposed and supported a new resolution in the UN Security Council that called for an end to the conflict without tagging Russia as the enemy or recognising Ukraine’s sovereignty.
This new development points to a growing conflict between the U.S. and its supposed European allies, as the Trump-led government prays closer relationship with Moscow, distancing itself from Kyiv. The U.S. has engaged in direct negotiations with Russia to resolve the conflict, moving away from its previous position of firmly backing Ukraine.
The United States (US) found itself siding with Russia on two votes at the United Nations, marking the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
This shift reflects a change in the US foreign policy under the administration of President Donald Trump. The Trump-led government has seen a departure from previous American stances on the war.
Before now, the US had rejected a European-drafted resolution that condemned Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and supported Ukraine’s territorial integrity. The resolution called for the condemnation of Russia’s actions and reaffirmed Ukraine’s sovereignty.
However, the Donald Trump-led administration’s hesitance to challenge Russia directly led to the US first voting against the resolution, now taking sides with countries such as Russia, North Korea, and Belarus. This was a significant departure from the US’s usual backing for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
The first voting occurred at the UN General Assembly (UNGA) in New York.
The resolution, which urged the condemnation of Russia’s invasion and maintained Ukraine’s sovereignty, was supported by 93 countries, except the US which voted against it.
The second vote came into place during the UN Security Council, where the US brought in its resolution calling for an abrupt end to the war.
The resolution was however notably refrained from criticising Russia.
This resolution reiterated a desire to end the war without apportioning blame, a position that raised concerns about tacit approval of Russia’s actions.
This vote shows the Trump government’s desire to embrace a more neutral, non-confrontational stance, focusing on de-escalating the war rather than holding Russia accountable.
This resolution passed with the backing of 10 members. However, major US allies, including the UK, France, Denmark, Greece, and Slovenia, did not vote following their attempts to amend the text which were rejected.
These votes came coincidentally at a time when there were high-profile diplomatic visits, including French President Emmanuel Macron’s meeting with Trump at the White House and upcoming discussions between British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Donald Trump.
These meetings follow deepening tensions over the war in Ukraine and the transatlantic alliance, which the Trump-led government has been alleged of undermining through its favouritism towards Moscow.
During a rare moment of disagreement at the UNGA, the United States decided to push a more limited resolution that mourned the loss of life in the Russia-Ukraine war and prayed for its swift resolution.
European diplomats, on the other hand, however, brought a more detailed resolution, condemning Russia for its aggression and reinforcing Ukraine’s sovereignty.
While the US and Russia voted together against the European resolution, Ukraine’s Deputy Foreign Minister Mariana Betsa reiterated that the world must not give reward to Russia’s aggression.
Ukrainian officials and lawmakers from America expressed concern over the US’s position on the issue.
Republican Senator John Curtis expressed his discomfort, stating he was “deeply troubled” by the vote, which placed the US together with North Korea and Russia.
In a post on X, he said: “These are not our friends. This posture is a dramatic shift from American ideals of freedom and democracy.”
In the Security Council, the US resolution, which was largely free of criticism toward Russia, passed but faced obstruction from several European allies.
US Acting Ambassador to the UN, Dorothy Camille Shea, supported the resolution, labelling it as a “simple historic statement” focused on looking forward and ending the war.
The US is usually not on opposite sides with its perceived European allies.
The US’s stance at the UN in these major votes reflects wider shifts in its foreign policy, with the Trump-led administration distancing itself from traditional alliances in support of a more unilateral approach.
The votes, while not legally binding, pointed to the tensions in the international community and emphasised the challenges of addressing the Russia-Ukraine war in a more diplomatic framework.

