Tag: Russia

  • Russia ban will be lifted – Gianni Infantino

    Russia ban will be lifted – Gianni Infantino

    FIFA President Gianni Infantino has stated that Russia’s suspension from international football should be lifted, insisting that the country should be allowed to return to the global game.

    Russia has been banned from football competitions since its invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

    However, the debate has resurfaced after the International Olympic Committee recommended that international sports federations allow Russian teams to compete again at youth level, a move Infantino believes should extend to football as well.

    Reacting to the development, Infantino in an interview with Sky News, stated the decision to suspend the Russians from the competition “has achieved nothing” and “has only generated more disappointment and hatred”.

    Read Also: Photos: Saraki receives FIFA President, Gianni Infantino

    “We have to, definitely,’ Infantino said when asked about potentially lifting the ban.

    “Because this ban has not achieved anything, it has just created more frustration and hatred.

    “Having girls and boys from Russia being able to play football games in other parts of Europe would help.”

  • Russia deploys nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile in attack on Ukraine

    Russia deploys nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile in attack on Ukraine

    At least four people were killed and 19 others injured in Kiev after Russia pummelled Ukraine with missiles and drones overnight, using its nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile to target western Ukraine.

    Kiev Mayor Vitali Klitschko said on Friday that a doctor was among the dead, while four medical workers were injured. Critical infrastructure had been hit in the attack, and some parts of the city were without power or water, he wrote on Telegram.

    The Russian Defence Ministry said on Telegram that the strikes were carried out in response to an alleged “terrorist attack” by Kiev on a residence of Russian President Vladimir Putin on December 29, 2025.

    Facilities producing unmanned aerial vehicles used in the alleged attack, as well as energy infrastructure, were hit, according to the ministry.

    Moscow has claimed Ukraine attempted to attack Putin’s Valdai residence in western Russia with 91 drones, all of which it said were shot down. Experts have questioned the account presented by Russia.

    Ukraine has rejected the accusations and accuses Moscow of using the false claim to justify strikes on government buildings.

    In the west of Ukraine, the Western Command of Ukraine’s Air Force earlier said a Russian strike on Lviv was conducted using an unidentified ballistic missile.

    The Ukrainian military reported that the missile was launched from the Kapustin Yar test area in Russia’s Astrakhan, a known launch site for the Oreshnik medium-range ballistic missile.

    Read Also: Trump’s oil push widens with seizure of Russian-flagged tanker linked to Venezuela

    Lviv Mayor Andriy Sadovyi said explosions had been recorded in Lviv, but there was currently no information about casualties. Civilian facilities and residential buildings in the city were not damaged, he added.

    The Russian Defence Ministry said the Oreshnik missile was used as part of the attacks on western Ukraine, marking the second strike on Ukraine involving the weapon.

    “The Russian armed forces have launched a massive strike with ground- and sea-based high-precision long-range weapons against critical targets in Ukraine, including the Oreshnik medium-range complex and drones,” the ministry said in a statement quoted by state news agency TASS.

    Russia first fired an Oreshnik missile at Ukraine’s industrial city of Dnipro in November 2024.

    At the time, Putin justified the strike as retaliation for Kiev’s use of long-range Western weapons against military targets in the Russian hinterland.

    Putin has claimed that Western air defence systems are incapable of intercepting the Oreshnik, which means hazel shrub in Russian. He has also said it could hit targets as far away as Western Europe.

    The first Oreshnik missile deployed against Ukraine did not carry warheads, with damage caused solely by its high speed.

    Still in testing at the time, the weapon can carry conventional and nuclear warheads and, with speeds up to 12,000 kilometres per hour and a range of 5,000 kilometres, poses a potential threat to Europe.

    The second Oreshnik targeting Ukraine was carrying conventional warheads, according to the Russian military.

    (dpa/NAN)

  • Russia’s shadow and West Africa’s democratic unravelling

    Russia’s shadow and West Africa’s democratic unravelling

    • By Oumarou Sanou

    Sir: The failed coup in Benin lasted barely a few hours, but it has exposed a dangerous trend across West Africa. What unfolded in Cotonou on December 7 was not just a clumsy mutiny by a handful of soldiers—it was a reminder of how fragile our democracies have become, and how eagerly foreign actors and their local proxies are exploiting public frustration to rewrite the political map of the region.

    By 7:30 a.m., shots were ringing around President Patrice Talon’s residence. Minutes later, a ragtag group of mutineers stormed the national broadcaster, declared the president “removed,” and presented an unknown artillery officer as leader of a so-called “Committee for Military Refoundation.” They looked startled, disorganised, and unconvincing. By midday, they had been flushed out, arrested, or had fled. Benin’s institutions held firm. The coup failed—and quickly.

    But the real story began online. Even before the first verified reports emerged, the usual chorus of self-styled “pan-African revolutionaries”—the same characters who cheerlead every military takeover from Niamey and Bamako to Ouagadougou—were already celebrating. The speed of their reaction raises serious questions. Kémi Seba, who has mastered the art of performative radicalism, hailed the mutiny as a “liberation day” before hastily deleting his post once the coup collapsed. Nathalie Yamb, Egountchi Behanzin, and other loud anti-Western voices recycled old protest videos, fabricated stories of “millions” marching, and claimed government statements were issued from “fake studios.” AES-linked accounts joined in, flooding the information space with lies. It was carefully coordinated and deliberate, intended to mislead.

    These people call themselves “pan-Africanists,” but their behaviour betrays something else entirely. Their activism is increasingly indistinguishable from geopolitical propaganda—loud when coups align with their sponsors, silent when repression occurs in their preferred authoritarian states. They do not defend Africa; they manipulate Africans.

    Read Also: Education budget has risen by N1.98tr under Tinubu, says Vice President Shettima

    Then came the most troubling detail: at the height of the coup attempt, two Russian vessels appeared near the port of Cotonou, only to withdraw once it became clear the mutineers had failed. Perhaps a coincidence—but the timing is too convenient, too familiar. Russia and its proxies have mastered the art of filling the cracks in fragile democracies, using information warfare, opportunistic “solidarity,” and covert support to reshape alliances. West Africa, battered by poor governance and eroding public trust, has become fertile ground for corruption.

    If there is comfort, it lies in the maturity shown by Benin’s institutions. The armed forces refused to splinter. The public rejected the mutiny unequivocally. Côte d’Ivoire and others signalled readiness to intervene. For once, democratic states in the region acted like they understood the stakes. And yet, the fact that such a small, ill-prepared group even attempted a coup underscores the depth of the political decay around us.

    Let’s be honest: West Africa is sitting on a democratic fault line. Elections are increasingly contentious. Institutions are underperforming. Citizens feel abandoned. Leaders behave with impunity. In such an environment, coups stop being unthinkable. They become tempting. And foreign actors—whether Moscow or any other power—are more than happy to exploit that vacuum. The danger is not just the coups themselves, but also the erosion of democratic norms that makes coups possible.

    ECOWAS and the African Union can no longer wait for crises to erupt before reacting. They need a standing peer-review mechanism for democratic governance—not the stale, symbolic reviews of the past, but real political diagnostics that confront uncomfortable truths. Countries must be assessed on press freedom, electoral integrity, judicial independence, civil-military relations, and public trust. Anything less is wishful thinking.

    The alarm bells are ringing. West Africa can still pull back from the brink—but only if its leaders choose courage over complacency.

    •Oumarou Sanou,

    sanououmarou386@gmail.com

  • Nigeria, Russia seek to deepen 65 years diplomatic relations

    Nigeria, Russia seek to deepen 65 years diplomatic relations

    Nigeria and Russia have reaffirmed commitment to practical collaboration in trade, economic and humanitarian spheres, in the interests of the peoples of both countries.

     This was contained in an exchange of congratulatory messages between the foreign ministers of the two countries on the 65th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between both countries.

    Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Tuggar and his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, in separate statements on the occasion of the long standing relationship, also look forward to deepen collaboration between both countries.

    Tuggar, in his statement, said Nigeria remains committed to the steady development and maintenance of an active and substantive political dialogue.

    “On behalf of the government and people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, I have the honour to convey warm congratulations to you and through you to the government and people of the Russian Federation, on this historic occasion of the 65th anniversary of diplomatic relations between our two countries.

    “As we celebrate this milestone, Nigeria reaffirms its commitment to strengthening partnership in a manner that advances the prosperity of our peoples and contributes to a more just and equitable international order.

    Read Also: Tinubu orders 24-hour aerial surveillance, tightens security cordon over Kwara, Kebbi forests

    “Since the establishment of ties on 25th November, 1960, Nigeria and Russia have maintained a relationship characterized by mutual respect, constructive dialogue and shared aspirations for global peace, stability and development. Over the decades, our cooperation has expanded across strategic sectors including Defence, Education, Energy, Science and Technology, Space Cooperation, Trade, and Cultural Exchange.”

    “I look forward to deepening collaboration in economy, security and increased people-to-people exchanges,” Tuggar said.

    On his part, Lavrov  expressed satisfaction with the level of cooperation between both countries.

    Lavrov said: “We note with satisfaction the high level of cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Nigeria, which is based on the principles of mutual respect, trust and the closeness of our positions across a broad range of regional and international issues.

    “We remain committed to the steady development and maintenance of an active and substantive political dialogue, as well as practical collaboration in the trade, economic and humanitarian spheres, in the interests of the peoples of our countries and in the support of sustainable peace and development on the African continent.

    “I wish you good health and every success, and to the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria – well-being and prosperity.”

  • Europeans urge U.S. Rubio to maintain pressure on Russia

    Europeans urge U.S. Rubio to maintain pressure on Russia

    • Zelenskiy: Ukraine ready to advance peace plan
    • Macron seeks fine-tuning of Trump’s peace plan

    The leaders of the European countries supporting Ukraine, the so-called coalition of the willing, yesterday insisted to keep pressuring Russia with sanctions in a video call with U.S. Secretary of Marco Rubio, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said.

    “Since pressure remains the only language Russia responds to, we will continue to increase it until there is a genuine willingness to engage on a credible path toward peace,” she said in post on X.

    She said the coalition will keep on supporting Ukraine and that a central point in the negotiations is the financing of Ukraine, which include the use of frozen Russian sovereign assets.

    This came as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Ukraine was ready to advance a U.S.-backed framework for ending the war with Russia and discuss disputed points with U.S. President Donald Trump in talks he said should include European allies.

    In a speech to the coalition of the willing allies, a copy of which was seen by Reuters, Zelenskiy urged European leaders to hash out a framework for deploying a “reassurance force” to Ukraine and to keep backing Kyiv for as long as Moscow showed no inclination to end its war.

    U.S. and Ukrainian officials have been trying to narrow the gaps between them over Trump’s plan to end Europe’s deadliest and most devastating conflict since World War Two, with Ukraine wary of being strong-armed into accepting a deal largely on Russian terms, including territorial concessions.

    “We firmly believe security decisions about Ukraine must include Ukraine, security decisions about Europe must include Europe … Because when something is decided behind the back of a country or its people, there is always a high risk it simply won’t work,” Zelenskiy said, according to his speech text.

    Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump’s peace plan needs improvement to make it acceptable for Ukraine and Europe, French President Emmanuel Macron told RTL radio.

    Read Also: ‘How alleged terrorists’ negotiator, Mamu got N50million for his efforts,’ DSS official tells court

    A 28-point U.S. peace proposal made last week caught many in the U.S. government, Kyiv and Europe off-guard and prompted fresh concerns that the Trump administration might be willing to push Ukraine to sign a deal heavily tilted towards Moscow.

    “It’s an initiative that goes in the right direction: towards peace. However, there are aspects of that plan that deserve to be discussed, negotiated, improved,” Macron said. “We want peace, but we don’t want peace that is effectively a capitulation.”

    He added that only the Ukrainians could decide what territorial concessions they are ready to make.

    “What was put on the table gives us an idea of what would be acceptable to the Russians. Does that mean that it is what must be accepted by the Ukrainians and the Europeans? The answer is no,” Macron added.

    Ukraine’s first line of defence in case of peace with Russia would be regenerating its own army, and there can be no limit on it, Macron said. He also said frozen Russian assets are in Europe, and Europe alone can decide what to do with them.

    The U.S. plan would impose a limit on the size of Ukraine’s army and give Washington some control of frozen Russian assets.

    A Ukrainian diplomat cautioned that territorial concessions remained a major sticking point, meaning a final deal was far from certain despite accords on various specific points. “These are really tough questions for us,” the diplomat said.

    Trump told a White House event yesterday he thought a deal on Ukraine was getting close but gave no other details, saying only: “We’re going to get there.”

    Zelenskiy could visit the U.S. in the next few days to finalise a deal with Trump, Kyiv’s national security chief Rustem Umerov said earlier on Tuesday, though there was no immediate confirmation of such a trip from the U.S. side.

  • Nigeria, Russia reaffirm commitment to strengthen trade, economic, humanitarian ties

    Nigeria, Russia reaffirm commitment to strengthen trade, economic, humanitarian ties

    Nigeria and Russia have reiterated their commitment to practical collaboration in trade, economic, and humanitarian sectors, aimed at benefiting the peoples of both countries. The pledge came in an exchange of congratulatory messages between their foreign ministers marking the 65th anniversary of diplomatic relations.

    Nigeria’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Yusuf Tuggar, and his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov, expressed optimism about deepening cooperation across multiple areas.

    In his statement, Tuggar said Nigeria remains dedicated to maintaining an active and substantive political dialogue with Russia. He congratulated the Russian government and people, noting that since diplomatic ties were established on November 25, 1960, the relationship has been built on mutual respect, constructive dialogue, and shared goals for global peace, stability, and development.

    “Our cooperation has expanded across strategic sectors including Defence, Education, Energy, Science and Technology, Space, Trade, and Cultural Exchange. We look forward to further strengthening collaboration in the economy, security, and people-to-people exchanges,” Tuggar said.

    Lavrov, for his part, expressed satisfaction with the current level of cooperation, describing it as rooted in mutual respect, trust, and alignment on regional and international issues.

    He reaffirmed Russia’s commitment to sustaining political dialogue and practical collaboration in trade, economic, and humanitarian fields to support the prosperity of both nations and promote sustainable peace and development across Africa.

    “I wish you good health and success, and to the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, well-being and prosperity,” Lavrov added.

  • Russia will never bow to U.S. pressure, says Putin

    Russia will never bow to U.S. pressure, says Putin

    President Vladimir Putin said yesterday that Russia would never bow to pressure from the United States or any other country, and cautioned that the response to any strikes deep into Russia would be very serious and overwhelming.

    U.S. sanctions are “unfriendly” act and “will have certain consequences, but they will not significantly affect our economic well-being,” Putin said. Russia’s energy sector feels confident, he said.

    “This is, of course, an attempt to put pressure on Russia,” Putin said. “But no self-respecting country and no self-respecting people ever decides anything under pressure.”

    Putin said breaking the balance in the global energy markets could lead to a hike in prices that would be uncomfortable for countries such as the United States, especially given the internal political calendar in the United States.

    Read Also: Madugu, Nnadozie  ‘missing’ as Ballon d’Or holds today in Paris

    Asked about a Wall Street Journal report that the Trump administration has lifted a key restriction on Ukraine’s use of some long-range missiles provided by Western allies, and remarks by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy about domestic missiles with a range of 3,000 km (1,900 miles), Putin said: “This is an attempt at escalation.”

    “But if such weapons are used to attack Russian territory, the response will be very serious, if not overwhelming. Let them think about it,” Putin said.

  • Russia plans tax hike to finance war on Ukraine

    Russia plans tax hike to finance war on Ukraine

    Russia plans to raise value-added tax (VAT) to help finance its war on Ukraine, the Finance Ministry said on Wednesday.

    Under the draft 2026 budget proposal, the VAT rate would increase to 22 per cent from the current 20 per cent.

    The government said it would continue to meet all social policy commitments, but listed defence, security and support for soldiers and their families as “strategic priorities.”

    Military and security spending already accounts for about 40 per cent of total government expenditure in the 2025 budget, according to government estimates.

    Large state orders for the defence industry and hefty payments to soldiers and their families have fuelled a period of growth for Russia’s war economy.

    Read Also: US outplaying itself on Russia, China

    But signs of strain are emerging in civilian sectors, and inflation is squeezing household budgets.

    The Finance Ministry said a lower 10 per cent VAT rate on food, medicines and children’s goods would remain unchanged.

    Russia, under the orders of President Vladimir Putin, has been waging a full-scale war on neighbouring Ukraine for more than three and a half years, with no end to the conflict in sight.

    The budget proposal still requires approval by parliament, a step widely seen as a formality in Russia.

    (dpa/NAN)

  • US outplaying itself on Russia, China

    US outplaying itself on Russia, China

    Decades of United States efforts to nurture strategic relations with China and India, while isolating Russia, have gone up in smoke under President Donald Trump’s tariff blitzkrieg. That nurturing produced a complicated diplomatic mosaic, which has now been considerably simplified and attenuated by Mr Trump to the detriment of the US. India and China were until the past few weeks ill at ease with each other, having fought a bitter and bloody border war in 1962; Russia and China were not the best of neighbours, with the former annexing a part of Chinese Manchuria (1858-1860), and after the Sino-Russia split in 1961, became bitter leadership rivals for the control of global communism, nearly coming to nuclear blows during the Zhenbao Island incident of 1969; while Russia and India relations had warm relations that peaked in 1971 (Friendship Treaty) but cooled and even stagnated after the collapse of Soviet Union until the 2000 Strategic Partnership, and again cooled as India veered West and fostered a rapprochement with China.

    Such diplomatic complexities, with all their intricate and delicate nuances, proved too cumbersome for President Trump to grasp. His insular view of diplomatic relations makes sense to him only if it is mediated by purely whimsical, boyish and punishing tariff impositions. On August 27, after India failed to heed US directive to desist from buying discounted Russian crude oil that saved the South Asian country $17bn, Mr Trump imposed 25% tariffs on some key Indian goods, and a further 25% punitive tariffs on those same goods, bringing the total tariffs to a whopping 50%, almost at par with the tariffs imposed on Brazilian exports to the US. Before the imposition of extraordinary tariffs on India, the South Asian country had enjoyed a trade surplus against US to the tune of over $4bn. The result of the tariffs is that India, which regards Mr Trump’s ultimatum as hostile and duplicitous, has begun to look elsewhere, defying America’s bullying tactics, and working to restore and rebuild relations with China. Much worse for the US, decades of American efforts to decouple India, the world’s biggest democracy and fifth largest economy, from China, the world’s second largest economy at $19.23 trillion to the US $30.50trn, has not only been reversed, the mistake is now probably beyond remedy. Having nurtured its relations with the West, and particularly the US, for decades, India is shocked by Mr Trump’s insensitivity and utter lack of strategic insight into global power politics as he unites the worlds’ second, third and fourth top military powers against America.

    The damage to US foreign policy and image consequent upon Mr Trump’s shallow and whimsical approach to global power politics is immense and probably irreparable. The world’s other economic and military powers will not only distrust the US, or probably hold it in contempt, they are almost certain to unite against it, a point the US president himself made in oblique reference to China’s President Xi Jinping hosting India, Russia and eighteen other countries at a two-day regional security and economic summit (The Shangai Cooperation Organisation) in Tianjin between August 31 and September 1. The purpose of the summit essentially was to intensify the effort to promote a powerful counterweight to the Western Alliance and produce a new global order. The Russo-Ukrainian war may have brought Russia down a peg or two, almost in the same way World War II paradoxically diminished the influence and power of Great Britain in contrast to the US, the Shangai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) will proceed in the years ahead to entrench itself as a countervailing force to the Western Alliance. To a President Xi hungry for global power and influence, Mr Trump’s bumbling and pedantic diplomacy is godsend.

    Read Also: Nigeria-China relations and the Global Governance Initiative

    No country, not even in the Western Alliance, trusts the US anymore, not to talk of Mr Trump in particular. The US president has not only alienated Asia and completely damaged and repudiated the Indo-Pacific alliance carefully curated by his predecessors to produce the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) and the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), both of which aimed to whittle down the growing geopolitical assertiveness of China as well as sustain the paramountcy of liberal international order, he has also managed in the same breath to antagonise the rest of the world, including Africa and Latin America. He has promoted American exceptionalism with a nationalistic and deeply offensive fervour, twisted visa policies without regard to America’s global leadership, ridiculed and discarded his country’s value system from which most of the world previously took their compass, turned his back on science, research and intellectuals, enthroned a truly vexatious sense of triumphalism and entitlement, promoted mercenary foreign policy, and returned the country to the unprofitable isolationism and racist tendency of the early 20th century that contradict and undermine America’s global ambition and position. No president anywhere has so profoundly undermined his country’s ennobling objectives.

    Mr Trump, though a darling of American evangelicals enamoured of the prophetic, may inadvertently be fulfilling Bible prophecy. Under him, there is an almost undecipherable and dystopian future about the US. How could such a richly endowed, powerful and dominant country elect someone so unendowed, so self-centred, so averse to logic, so pedestrian? But it happened, not just once, but twice. After his reelection, he has embraced the most retrogressive and pugnacious domestic and foreign policies ever, and projected his personal insecurity upon his country. The ordinary task of analysing and explicating the future and ambition of his country eludes him in a way that made ancient Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar far his superior. Shorn of any capacity for reflection or circumspection, and unlike King Nebuchadnezzar who wondered what fate awaited Babylon after his death, Mr Trump has spared no thought for his country after his presidency, beyond of course his insufferable comparisons, nor wondered why the bible seems silent on the US while giving copious mention to the alliance between Russia and China vis-à-vis the solution to the Palestinian conundrum.

    China may not have been tested in war since Deng Xiaoping inspired its economic renaissance, but it has in the past one decade or a little more deployed its newfound economic power to forge a technological base and military machine that may have exceeded Russia’s capability. One day, inevitably, this machine will be put to use, perhaps at a time America seems truly and irrevocably isolated. If the timeline of the collapse of the Soviet Union is any example, it will be futile to imagine or calculate that fateful date to be far in the future. Under Mr Trump, America has antagonised nearly every country and embarked on scorched-earth foreign policy as well as racist and divisive domestic policies. His successors, even if they are not cut from the same cloth, may find the damage hard to amend.

  • No NATO troops in Ukraine, says Russia

    No NATO troops in Ukraine, says Russia

    •Kiev’s allies talk security guarantees

    Ukraine’s Western allies are due to meet in Paris yesterday to hammer out a plan on how to deter Russia from attacking again in case a peace deal is reached.

    However, Moscow once again made clear it would be difficult to get on board.

    “These are not security guarantees for Ukraine, but a guarantee of insecurity on the European continent,” said Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova in Vladivostok.

    “Russia will continue to reject the deployment of any NATO troops to Ukraine to monitor a potential ceasefire, Zakharova said.

    “Russia will not discuss deeply unacceptable foreign intervention in Ukraine that undermines security,” Zakharova said at the Eastern Economic Forum in the Pacific port city.”

     yesterday’s meeting, which is scheduled to begin at 10 am (0800 GMT), convened the Coalition of the Willing, a loose alliance of some 30 countries working on a plan to secure Ukraine’s sovereignty when the war, launched by Moscow in February 2022, ends.

    Proposals on the table included strengthening the Ukrainian armed forces but also political and military commitments to Kiev in case Russia launches another attack on its smaller neighbour.

    One particularly contentious issue is whether partners would send ground troops into Ukraine or deploy them near the country’s borders to support the Ukrainian military.

    Russian proposals had so far, boiled down to appointing the five permanent members of the UN Security Council as guarantor powers.

    However, this would include Russia itself, giving it the right to veto intervention by other countries in favour of Ukraine.

    Meanwhile, President Vladimir Putin has made no attempt in hiding his lack of interest in any deal that he considers to be unfavourable to Russia.

    On Wednesday, he said that fighting in Ukraine would continue if no agreement is reached with Kiev.

    NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte  yesterday defended the ongoing plans for possible deployment of European troops in Ukraine following a potential ceasefire with Russia.

    Ahead of a meeting of Ukraine’s Western allies in Paris later  yesterday, Russia again rejected the deployment of any NATO troops to Ukraine to monitor a potential peace deal.

    Read Also: Building AI literacy for every Nigerian

    “Why are we interested in what Russia thinks about troops in Ukraine?” Rutte said in response at an event organised by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in Prague.

    Ukraine is a sovereign country, he said, and it is not up to Russia to decide on a troop presence.

    The so-called Coalition of the Willing is due to discuss how to ensure the security of the country attacked by Russia after a possible end to the war at the meeting in Paris.

    The focus is on strengthening the Ukrainian army, but also on political and military commitments in the event of renewed Russian aggression.

    Rutte is expected to join the Paris meeting hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer via video-link.

    According to military sources, a troop presence by European NATO countries in Ukraine could primarily involve a large-scale training mission.

    This means that it would not be a peacekeeping force in the traditional sense.

    A week ago EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas said there is broad support among EU countries to train Ukrainian military personnel  also on Ukrainian soil once a ceasefire is reached with Russia.