Tag: Rwanda

  • Rwanda: Tourism destination forging ahead

    Rwanda is known as the country of a thousand hills. The country spread out in folds of undulating hills and mountains covered by lush green foliage. It boasts of a very mild weather that is punctured by rain cloud and rains with a very welcoming people.

    Gradually, Rwanda is gathering fans among adventure travellers who are looking for a new experience different from safari that is offered by South Africa, Kenya and the others. The highland gorillas of volcanoes mountains in Ruhengeri, northern Rwanda offers a new thrill and new experience.

    Gorilla trekking is  a new unique offering by Rwanda. There are other sites like the Genocide Memorial Museum in Kigali. There are  a thousand and one adventures to explore. Nigerian travellers are now seeing the country as a new travel destination.

    Cecile Mambo, the managing director of CMD Tours, is one of those currently packaging different tours to Rwanda.

    She talked about the adventure and leisure options available in the country:

    “When  we talk about Rwanda, the first thing that comes to mind is the genocide. I had a chat with the Rwandan Ambassador to Nigeria, His Excellency Stanislas, and he was trying to sell Rwanda to me.

    “He was telling me all that they have there. I also had a meeting with the President, Rwandan Residents’ Association in Nigeria  came to us because we are a travel agent. He came to ask and asked why we did not package Rwanda.  I was like apart from the genocide museum, what else? Who wants to go there, I asked. He advised me to try and go there. He said even Ellen deGeneres has been to Rwanda. That made me to be interested in going. I said to myself that if somebody who is based in the United States could go there, I could equally. It means there is something to see. I decided to go.

    “When I got there, I was really amazed by what I saw. It was completed different from my perception. I stayed at Radisson Blu and …. Radisson was the highest of luxury. It was everything beautiful. We started our tour a day after I got there. We went to Lake Kivu in Ribavu Region of the country. When we got there, the resort was amazing. Everything was perfect: they were friendly and well trained and the ambience was superb. They have a  hot spring lake from an active volcano in Congo.

    “According to the indigenes, the spring has medicinal values. “From there, we went to Akagera Park. That place also blew my mind. There were wild animals in there natural habitat: lions, giraffes, antelopes and so on. It was an amazing experience.”

    Kigali, the Rwanda capital, is gradually emerging as Africa’s leading convention destination. It has hosted the African Union summit in 2016 and top corporate conventions. The city has become a go-to in terms of high profile events and conferences. One hotel among others  in the capital that is making  this happen in Kigali is the newly built Radisson Blu Hotel and Convention Centre located at the heart of the city. It is a kind of one-stop venue that provides end to end facilities for meetings, incentives, conferences and exhibitions (MICE).

    Denis J. Dernault,  the Complex General Manager talked about what has made Kigali the leading conference venue for Africa: “One of the very important factors here is the ease of doing business which has  been facilitated by the authorities. In addition to that is the fact that every citizen of the world can enter the country without pre-requesting visa.

    “That is one of the key factors for people who are into MICE. That is one of the elements which is very important. The second is that as a businessman when you travel, it is important as well to ensure that the destination that you are going to is secure. This is another area that Rwanda is doing very well.

    “The third factor is that we have an airport which is going to be opened shortly, in about a year and half. So, it is to ensure that air connectivity is there and benefits the most potential market. That is very interesting , it ensures that the venue we have here,   the Radisson Blu and Convention Centre, Kigali are having the best benefits from these factors.”

    He talked about the conference facilities available in Radisson Blu Kigali that made it a hit: “ I think the first one is quality. We have been tested; we’ve had  high profile events and we know we can deliver. For those in this type of business know that in Rwanda, whatever you are doing, you will have these quality factors, responding to your occasion.

    “The second thing is that we have a facility which is highly flexible. We have the facilities to organize from small to large events. These are some of the things I believe give us an edge. Also, with the number of meeting rooms that we have, the number of exhibition spaces that we have. These give us the flexibility to organize any kind of event.

    “Adding to that, we have, in terms of technology, very little that the convention centre can offer in terms of internet by fibre, that we can’t offer here. We have a facility that can cater for over 20,000 devices at the same. So, that is very important in the connected world that we are today. Here, there is a focus on the new technology. That puts us really at a place where an organization that if they want a meeting which are highly connected…as we have done before, if we refer to the Montreal Protocol, which was a paperless meeting. We can deliver on all these.”

    For all kinds of tourists, Rwanda is gradually the preferred destination.

  • From Rwanda: herdsmen vs farmers

    I am a member of Senior Course 26 of the Armed Forces Command and Staff College, Jaji, Kaduna.  I was for the course in 2006 and it was during the course that I met two very fine officers from Rwanda.  They were both Lieutenant-Colonels; and they were both Tutsis.  Both of them were battle-hardened and one of them had battle scars to show for it (lost one eye, lost many fingers).

    These two officers gave me a better understanding of the Rwandan conflict from a herdsmen/farmers perspective; and how it was resolved.  I believe we could draw lessons from them.  Below is a narrative of what they told me:

    1. Tutsis and Hutus are basically the same ethnic group.  They speak the same language and they belong to the same religion: Christianity.
    2. Traditionally, the terms Tutsi and Hutu were social classes: a class difference based on ownership of cows.  If you owned more than 10 cows, then you were a Tutsi; and if you owned less than 10, you were Hutu.
    3. Traditionally, you could move from being a Tutsi to a Hutu and vice versa, according to the increase or decrease of your cows. (Their colonial masters tried to tweak it but that is another story).
    4. Tutsis were only 15 per cent of the population, as of the time of the Rwandan conflict.
    5. The underlying factor/remote causes of the conflict, according to the officers, was the dwindling livestock; and a homeland status for the Tutsis. (Many of us know the other political, humanitarian and economic issues).
    6. A bitter conflict ensued and the Tutsis emerged victorious (if that is the correct terminology).  Paul Kegame, who is a Tutsi, became the president.

    Winning the peace

    The people of Rwanda decided to win the peace after the conflict through a “no victor, no vanquished “ arrangement, amongst other deliberate policies.

    This entailed addressing the root problems/causes of the conflict.  One of such problems was addressing the herdsmen (Tutsi)/farmers (Hutu) problem.

    It was agreed that the Tutsi were to be settled with their cows.  The government  would embrace a zero-grazing policy through a feedlot arrangement (not ranching) — feedlots are very small spaces that hold a high stocking density of livestock.  Many people do not realize that ranches occupy large spaces.  The ideal stocking density is two cows per hectare in open grazing.  A hectare is two football fields, side by side — 100 metres/100 metres or 1000 square metres).

    Steps taken

    The government embarked on land demarcation, infrastructure development and replacement of the Watutsi (the Tutsi cows, just like the White Fulani or Red Bororo), with more exotic cows like the Friesian Holstein, that had more milk yield per individual cow, at a ration of 1:3, or even, 1:4.  That meant that the Tutsis could have fewer cows with more yields. Incidentally, one of the officers was then the chairman of the Friesian Holstein Cattle Owners Association of Rwanda.

    The herdsmen (Tutsis) were then encouraged to exchange their Watutsi cows with the more exotic breeds; and to move their cows into feedlots where they could get additional government support/incentives from the government.

    Both groups agreed and the policy was implemented.  They eventually came to realize the importance of each group and their interdependence.  This created a new economy at the grassroots and it was a major contributory factor to peace in Rwanda.  I saw a similar arrangement in Ethiopia in 2010; and it was also working there.

    Rwanda has taught us that the problem of clashes between herdsmen and farmers could be solved/resolved to the benefit of all.  I believe that it could work in Nigeria, with careful planning and execution.

    Lesson learnt

    1. Herdsmen/farmers conflict could happen even amongst people of the same ethnicity and religion, for socio-economic reasons.  We should therefore avoid looking at the current challenges in Nigeria from an ethno-religious point of view.
    2. The settlement of herdsmen is a process and not an event that could happen overnight.  Governments should realize that it would take more than laws to address the challenges.  It would require careful planning by the government at all levels, building of infrastructure, development of a support mechanism, application of realistic  laws and organizing the people for mutual benefit.
    3. The challenges of clashes between herdsmen and farmers are not insurmountable. They could be solved/resolved to the benefit of all in Nigeria.

     

    • Col. Nass is a retired officer of the Nigerian Army and a veteran of the Sierra Leone conflict, where he served as one of the ECOMOG field commanders
  • AfCFTA: MAN urges FG to examine trade conditions

    The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria ( MAN ), has urged the Federal Government to renegotiate trade conditions that will impede economic growth in its review of the Africa Continental Free Trade Area ( AfCFTA ) Agreement.

    The MAN President, Dr Frank Jacob, gave the advice in an interview with the News men on Tuesday in Lagos.

    According to him, MAN is apprehensive that the Rules of Origin in the AfCFTA cannot be adequately enforced to guard against influx of European Union ( EU ) goods into the Nigerian market.

    The Rules of origin are used to determine the country of origin of a product for purposes of international trade.

    The News men reports that the AfCFTA is part of Africa’s plan to promote Intra and Inter-regional trade, economic cooperation and partnership on the continent by 2063.

    AfCFTA seeks to make Africa the largest free trade area, improve its economies and strengthen its position in global trade.

    “We are afraid that the Rules of Origin cannot be adequately enforced because goods from the EU can find their way into one of the African countries that have bilateral agreement with the EU.

    “When the goods get into the African country, they can repackage them, change the label from Made in Europe to that of the African country.

    “That same goods will surely find its way to Nigeria which is the main target market for the EU,” Jacob said.

    Jacob also noted that the market access of the agreement was a concern to manufacturers, as it leaves low protection to locally produced goods.

    “The agreement says that 90 per cent of the tariff plan would be liberalised, leaving only 10 per cent to protect manufacturers, and that 10 per cent is too low.

    “That means the rest of the 90 per cent is open, duty free, people can import.

    Read Also:  FEC okays agreement on African Free Trade in Kigali

    “What we are saying is that the 10 per cent is too small, even at the current Common External Tariff ( CET ) regime, we enjoy more than 10 per cent.

    “How can they now expect us to accept only 10 per cent as the only protected tariff line. That is an area that is of great concern to us,” Jacob said.

    He noted that the AfCFTA would impede the growth of the manufacturing sector, lead to dearth of many businesses, increase the country’s unemployment rate, and incapacitate local technological advancement.

    The MAN boss commended President Muhammadu Buhari for canceling his scheduled trip to Kigali, Rwanda, to sign the framework agreement for establishing the African Continental Free Trade Area.

    Buhari on March 18, canceled his scheduled visit to Rwanda to attend an Extra-Ordinary Summit of the African Union on March 21.

    The President was to sign the framework agreement for establishing the African Continental Free Trade Area during the Summit that would host leaders of African countries.

    According to a statement from the Presidency, the trip was canceled to allow for more consultations with stakeholders in Nigeria over the trade agreement.

    It would be recalled that the Nigerian Labour Congress ( NLC ) and the Organised Private Sector ( OPS ) had kicked against AfCFTA.

    NAN

  • Rwanda closes ‘700 unsafe, noisy churches’

    Rwanda closes ‘700 unsafe, noisy churches’

    About 700 churches have been closed down in Rwanda for failing to comply with building regulations and for noise pollution.

    Most of them are small Pentecostal churches. One mosque was also closed.

    A government official told the BBC that some of the more than 700 buildings shut down have reopened after they were approved by inspectors.

    According to a proposed law, all preachers must have theological training before opening a church.

    Pentecostal churches, often run by charismatic preachers claiming to be able to perform miracles, have grown rapidly in many parts of Africa in recent years.

    Some are massive, attracting thousands of worshippers each Sunday, but others consist of tiny structures built without planning permission.

    Church leaders have been criticised for using loud public address systems to attract worshippers.

    Government official Justus Kangwagye told the BBC’s Focus on Africa programme that they simply required the churches to meet “modest standards”.

    Some church premises exposed worshippers to unnecessary risks and could “cause danger to those worshipping,” Mr Kangwagye told the Rwandan New Times.

  • Rwanda, Uganda deny signing migrant deals with Israel

    Rwanda, Uganda deny signing migrant deals with Israel

    Rwanda and Uganda both have said they had not struck any deal to take in African migrants from Israel under a scheme condemned by rights groups

    Israel said on Wednesday it would pay thousands of African migrants living illegally in the country to go home or to “third countries”, threatening them with jail if they are caught after the end of March.

    The Israeli government did not say where the refugees should go. But rights groups including Hotline for Refugees and Migrants have said Uganda and Rwanda had agreed to take in migrants from Israel in the past.

    “#Rwanda has no deal whatsoever with #Israel to host any African migrant from that country,” Rwanda’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Olivier Nduhungirehe, tweeted on Friday.

    His Ugandan counterpart, Okello Oryem, echoed the message.

    “There is no written agreement or any form of agreement between the government of Uganda and Israeli government to accept refugees from Israel,” Oryem told Reuters.

    Any suggestion to the contrary was “fake news … absolute rubbish,” he added.

    The vast majority of migrants in Israel came from Eritrea and Sudan and many say they fled war and persecution as well as economic hardship, but Israel treats them as economic migrants.

    Rights groups have accused Israel of being slow to process African migrants’ asylum requests as a matter of policy and denying legitimate claims to the status.

  • Rwanda, Uganda denies migrant deals with Israel

    Rwanda, Uganda denies migrant deals with Israel

    Rwanda and Uganda both on Friday said they had not struck any deal to take in African migrants from Israel under a scheme condemned by rights groups.

    Israel has said on Wednesday it would pay thousands of African migrants living illegally in the country to go home or to “third countries”, threatening them with jail if they are caught after the end of March.

    The Israeli government did not say where the refugees should go.

    However, rights groups including Hotline for Refugees and Migrants have said Uganda and Rwanda had agreed to take in migrants from Israel in the past.

    “Rwanda has no deal whatsoever with Israel to host any African migrant from that country,” Rwanda’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Olivier Nduhungirehe, said.

    His Ugandan counterpart, Okello Oryem, echoed the message.

    “There is no written agreement or any form of agreement between the government of Uganda and Israeli government to accept refugees from Israel.

    Any suggestion to the contrary was fake news absolute rubbish,’’ Oryem told Reuters.

    The vast majority of migrants in Israel came from Eritrea and Sudan and many say they fled war and persecution as well as economic hardship, but Israel treats them as economic migrants.

    Rights groups have accused Israel of being slow to process African migrants’ asylum requests as a matter of policy and denying legitimate claims to the status.

  • CHAN 2018: Eagles to face Libya, Rwanda, Equatorial Guinea  

    CHAN 2018: Eagles to face Libya, Rwanda, Equatorial Guinea  

    Nigeria’s Super Eagles will face 2014 champions Libya, as well as Rwanda and Equatorial Guinea, in the group stage of the 5th African Nations Championship (CHAN) in Morocco.

    The competition is holding from Jan. 13 to Feb. 4, with the Eagles playing their Group C matches in Tangier.

    Libya had shocked all by winning in South Africa at the expense of Ghana, in spite of the North African nation being embroiled in political turmoil at the time.

    Nigeria had finished third at the 2014 competition, and will need to be wary of them this time around, after late Friday’s Draw Ceremony in Rabat has now paired them.

    Rwanda were the last team to qualify for the 2018 finals, edging Ethiopia 3-2 on aggregate in a play-off after Egypt decided to forfeit its slot at the championship.

    Equatorial Guinea qualified for the finals following Gabon’s withdrawal of Gabon.

    Hosts Morocco, Guinea, Sudan and Mauritania have been drawn in Group A.

    The Atlas Lions will be facing Mauritania in the competition’s opening match at the Mohamed V Stadium in Casablanca on Jan. 13.

    Hosts of the inaugural edition of the competition in 2009, Cote d’Ivoire, head Group B which will be based in Marrakech, and have Zambia, Uganda and Namibia as group mates.

    Group D, based in Agadir, has 2011 runners-up Angola, Cameroon, Congo and Burkina Faso.

    Group A (Casablanca)

    Morocco

    Guinea

    Sudan

    Mauritania

    Group B (Marrakech)

    Cote d’Ivoire

    Zambia

    Uganda

    Namibia

    Group C (Tangier)

    Libya

    Nigeria

    Rwanda

    Equatorial Guinea

    Group D (Agadir)

    Angola

    Cameroon

    Congo

    Burkina Faso

    NAN

  • Character challenge

    When Rwanda erupted into one of the most appalling cases of mass murder the world has ever witnessed in 1994, many thought that may be the end of that country. Many of the majority Hutu turned on their Tutsi and moderate Hutu neighbours, killing an estimated 800,000 people. It didn’t end there; it also created a huge refugee crisis when the Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF) troops entered Kigali, the capital. Hundreds of thousands, if not millions – mainly Hutus – fled to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), creating another crisis that lasted for years.

    So, how was Rwanda able to turn the tide under twenty years? The answer lies in character education. For even the most casual of observers, there are striking similarities about what happened in Rwanda in most African countries including Nigeria. So, how Rwanda made it is today a case study on how it is now one of the choice tourism destinations in Africa

    A number of measures were adopted. Rwanda consciously embarked on national integration and orientation rather than focus on reprisal attacks and vengeance. The British Guardian – during the commemoration of the 20th anniversary of the genocide – put it this way: “Born in the years since the genocide, children are educated in schools that are strongly encouraged to desist from using potentially divisive labels. Pupils are discouraged from identifying themselves as Hutu or Tutsi and are instead asked to focus on building the future of a common Rwanda. To this end, in 2001, the government unveiled a new flag and national anthem.”

    Next was the establishment of special village courts called gacacas. With strong encouragement from the government, survivors across the country then accepted the perpetrators back into their communities. There are unbelievable stories – by African standards – where perpetrators and their victims now live side by side in peace and harmony. This is complemented by the practice of doing regular community work, which was grounded in the Rwandan tradition of ‘umuganda.’

    This was reintroduced not only as part of the effort to rebuild the country, but as a way to foster a community spirit. Once a month, Rwandans are called upon to perform communal tasks such as building a house for the needy, laying a road and other activities that bind people together.

    My intervention today is on the need for character education. Again, even the most casual observer knows that we have deep seated problems in Nigeria. Most of these problems are self-inflicted, endemic and systemic. Both the leadership and the led are guilty. Take a look around and tell me if you’re not embarrassed by some of the people elected, who now parade themselves as leaders.

    I love what one church in Nigeria is doing. Knowing that it is most times difficult to change the views and perspective of full grown adults, it focuses instead on teenagers and young adults. It deploys huge resources in letting them know always that what they see around them daily is an aberration and not the norm. The church sometimes takes them on excursions to organised societies for them to have a practical sense of what they are being taught and encouraged to believe in. This, to me, is one of the best forms of character education.

    Character education is a learning process that enables students and adults in a school community to understand, care about and take action on core ethical values such as respect, justice, civic virtue, citizenship, and responsibility for self and others. Upon such core values, attitudes and actions are formed, which then serve as the hallmark of safe, healthy and informed communities.

    Character education lessons include universally accepted character traits or core values such as respect, honesty, responsibility, and fairness. Think of how you would want to be treated by others, and there’s a good chance those actions are part of a character education lesson. It is more than slogans as it strives to assist children to truly understand what good character traits are, and must help them think through how to live a life based on good traits. It equally focuses on teaching kids how to make good choices when faced with difficult situations.

    Our nation is gradually falling apart because of gross character deficiency. Can we honestly say the majority are trustworthy, have respect for authority and each other, take responsibility, act fairly, are caring, and are good citizens of the country? We all know the answer. But these are the superstructure or pillar, which progressive societies rest upon. In essence, character education focuses on trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness/equity, caring and good citizenship.

    These six pillars of character education include topics about being honest, doing what you say you will do, respect for others, using self-control, being accountable, playing by the rules, treating people fairly, forgiving others, and more.

    We have a growing youth population whose world view are systematically being shaped by pervasive meaninglessness and twisted logic of crass materialism and demented social values. This should not be surprising because we have chosen the road of less resistance as we continually nurture anti-intellectual environment that glorifies everything, but learning. Even where we learn, some products of these learning are an apology. It was not the case two decades ago.

    I believe that the moral and ethical challenge we have today can be effectively tackled through character education to save succeeding generations. We should imbibe character education because of the positive impact it would have toward a child’s emotional, moral, and intellectual development. I came across a research which indicated that schools that teach character education in one of the western countries report higher academic performance, improved attendance, reduced violence, fewer disciplinary issues, reduction in substance abuse, and less vandalism.

    The research indicated further that students’ who attend character education schools report feeling safer because they know their fellow students value respect, responsibility, compassion and hard work. From a practical perspective, it’s simply easier to teach children who can exercise patience, self-control, and diligence than adults whose views and perspectives have been shaped and fixed.

    It needs to be pointed out that no one is born with good character; it’s not a hereditary trait. And it is not determined by a single noble act. Character is established by conscientious adherence to moral values, not by lofty rhetoric or good intentions. Another way of saying that is, character is ethics in action.

    In essence, character is both formed and revealed by how one deals with everyday situations as well as extraordinary pressures and temptations. Like a well-made tower, character is built stone by stone, decision by decision.

    The way we treat people we think cannot help or hurt us – like housekeepers, waiters, and secretaries – tells more about our character than how we treat people we think are important. How we behave when we think no one is looking or when we do not think we will get caught more accurately portrays our character than what we say or do in service of our reputations.

    Of course, our assessment of a person’s character is an opinion and it is not always right. Abraham Lincoln recognised an important difference between character and reputation. “Character,” he said “is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.”

    Because the shape of a shadow is determined by the angle of light and the perspective of the observer, it’s not a perfect image of the tree. In the same way, reputation is not always an accurate reflection of character. Oscar Wilde once said: “Sincerity is one of the most important qualities in a person. And once you can fake that you have it made.” This cynical quip explains why some people are able to create a much better reputation than they deserve. By the same token, there are others, who deserve better reputations than they have.

    Though reputation is merely a perception it still has very significant real impact. Reputation is not only the result of what people think of us, it often determines what people, who do not know us think about us, treat us and whether we are held in high or low esteem.

    A good reputation for integrity, for instance, is a primary determinant of credibility and trust, two very marketable assets.

  • Photo: Osinbajo at Kagame’s inauguration in Rwanda

    Photo: Osinbajo at Kagame’s inauguration in Rwanda

    ACTING PRESIDENT YEMI OSINBAJO, SAN ATTENDS PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION OF PRESIDENT PAUL KAGAME OF RWANDA IN KIGALI, THE COUNTRY’S CAPITAL. 18TH AUGUST 2017. PHOTOS BY: NOVO ISIORO
  • Rwanda’s Kagame sweeps presidential polls to win third term

    Rwanda’s Kagame sweeps presidential polls to win third term

    Rwanda’s incumbent leader Paul Kagame has sealed a crushing victory in presidential elections that granted him a third term in office, extending his 17 years in power.

    Kagame has won international plaudits for presiding over a peaceful and rapid economic recovery in the Central African nation since the 1994 genocide, when an estimated 800,000 people Tutsis and moderate Hutus were killed.

    But he has also faced mounting censure for what critics and rights groups say are widespread human rights abuses, a muzzling of independent media and suppression of political opposition.

    With 80 per cent of votes accounted for, the 59-year-old former guerrilla leader secured 98.66 percent, the National Electoral Commission’s Executive secretary Charles Munyaneza told a news conference.

    “We expect that even if we get 100 percent of votes, there will not be any change,” he said.

    The board expected turnout to top 90 per cent in the East African country of 12 million citizens once full details emerged, in elections that fielded only a single opposition candidate, Frank Habineza, and an independent.

    Kagame, who cast his vote in Kigali’s Rugunga polling station earlier on Friday, said he would work to sustain economic growth in the tiny nation.

    “This is another seven years to take care of issues that affect Rwandans and ensure that we become real Rwandans who are (economically) developing,” he said in a speech broadcast live on television.

    Under his rule, some dissidents were killed after they fled abroad, in cases that remain unsolved. The government denies any involvement.

    Kagame, a commander who led Tutsi rebel forces into Rwanda to end the 1994 genocide, banned the use of tribal terms after becoming president.

    He won the last election in 2010 with 93 per cent of the vote and during this campaign for a further seven-year term, said he expected an outright victory.

    Habineza, who has so far won 0.45 percent of the early count, had promised to set up a tribunal to retry dissidents whose convictions by Rwandan courts have been criticized as politically motivated.

    Another would-be opponent, Diane Rwigara, was disqualified by the election board despite her insistence that she met all the requirements to run.

    “To me I see this as a one-man race. I simply did not go to vote,” said one man in Kigali who asked not to be named. (Reuters/NAN)