Tag: Sagay

  • Sagay: Transparency International report erroneous

    Sagay: Transparency International report erroneous

    Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) chairman Prof Itse Sagay (SAN) yesterday described the latest Corruption Perception Index (CPI) released by Transparency International (TI) as erroneous.

    The index, which ranks 180 countries and territories by their perceived levels of public sector corruption, uses a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 is highly corrupt and 100 is very clean.

    While Nigeria scored 27/100 and was ranked 136th in 2016, the latest CPI scores Nigeria 28/100.

    It ranks 148 out of 180 countries surveyed —12 places below where it was the previous year.

    Sagay said corruption was perceived to still be high because of frequent revelations of acts of graft.

    To him, TI misinterpreted the fact that acts of corruption were being exposed on daily basis.

    He said: “Transparency International is making a major error. It is confused between the actual level of corruption and the level of revelation of acts of corruption. Corruption was worse than now.

    “But, because of the activities of the anti-corruption agencies, particularly the EFCC, virtually no day passes without one act of corruption or the other being revealed.

    “To someone who is just relying on statistics of what is revealed, it’d seem that corruption is increasing. In fact, it is decreasing, because those that are revealed involve prosecution of suspects or forfeiture of assets.

    “Corruption is being dealt with. So, that’s the error there.”

    PACAC Executive Secretary Prof Bolaji Owasanoye said the index relies on public opinion, but that fighting corruption was an ongoing process.

    “The way the study is conducted is that public opinion is sought on perception,” he said.

    According to him, people may perceive corruption as being high because of low conviction rate.

    “They have not seen people in jail, but of course that is a process that cannot be short-circuited, and all manner of reforms are going on around that,” Owasanoye said.

    Special Assistant on Prosecution to the President, Chief Okoi Obono-Obla, described the report as a “sham” which does not reflect the reality.

    “Indication cannot be the reality. Those reports are based on assumptions and sometimes they are not true. Are we not fighting corruption? We cannot kill people. Do they expect us to slaughter everybody before they know that this government is fighting corruption?

  • Sagay: I didn’t threaten judges

    Sagay: I didn’t threaten judges

    Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) Chairman Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN) has denied a report that he threatened judges, saying his views were misrepresented.

    The report (not by The Nation) had the headline: ”Sagay threatens judges who ignore provisions of ACJA”.

    He said in a statement: “I want to deny emphatically that I issued any threat to judges.  What I said was that some judges still adjourn corruption cases for more than the maximum of 14 days stipulated by the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).

    “I also said there have been cases in which judges have adjourned to give rulings in interlocutory applications instead of waiting for the day of judgment on the substantive matter to read both ruling on the interlocutory application and judgment on the substantive issue of corruption.

    “I then added that in my view, such lapses constituted gross misconduct deserving of sanctions by the National Judicial Council (NJC).

    “Thus, the use of the term ‘Sagay threatens judges’ is inflammatory sensationalism.  I appreciate that newspapers have to make sales in order to survive.  But that should not give rise to undue sensationalism and offensive terms at the expense of accuracy and the true message of the person interviewed.

    “I am very open to interviews because I believe that the press is a critical institution in the fight against corruption. This cooperation and openness will be destroyed by the publication of inaccurate, self-serving and misleading statements in the guise of interview reports.”

  • Sagay: predatory elite  responsible for Nigeria’s woes

    Sagay: predatory elite responsible for Nigeria’s woes

    Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) Chairman Prof Itse Sagay (SAN) has delivered the 27th convocation lecture of the Federal University of Technology, Minna (FUT MINNA) in Niger State. He blamed the political class’ greed for Nigeria’s woes. MAHMUD ABDULSALAM, OLARENWAJU FASASI, MARIAM OYIZA and IBRAHIM OLADIPUPO report.

    how did Nigeria find itself at a crossroads? What factors stunted the country’s socio-economic growth and its march to nationhood?

    The Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) Chairman, Prof Itse Sagay (SAN) provided the answers. He blamed the greed of the political class for the nation’s woes.

    He stated this at  the 27th Convocation lecture of the Federal University of Technology, Minna (FUT MINNA) in Niger State, which had as theme: Nigeria: The travails of an Animal Kingdom.

    The constitutional law professor said the “deadly predatory attitude” of the elite bled the nation’s fortunes. He said the elite bestiality could be illustrated by the indifference they showed towards the masses’ plight, pointing out that the political class had been infected with an incurable greed and corrupt tendencies.

    Sagay, a former of dean of Faculty of Law, University of Benin (UNIBEN), noted that looting by politicians entrenched poverty in the land and impoverished the masses. He said the elite lacked good values, honour, integrity, and compassion for the downtrodden.

    He argued that the lust for diverting public funds by government officials and political appointees typified the “dog eats dog” narrative and “survival of the fittest” theory.

    He said: “Public funds are for executing developmental projects. But, when deceitful public servants conspire to milk our national treasury, it is the masses that bear the agony of dehumanising unemployment, moribund health facilities, dilapidated infrastructure, erratic power supply, and ‘killer’ roads. The alarming rate of ethnic conflagrations, insurgency, kidnapping, suicide missions and militancy among other problems are spiral effects of the elite’s predation.”

    The Senior Advocate expressed concern over what he called “warped perception” of Nigerians who see public service been an avenue to “come and eat” rather than service to the nation. He said once people get appointed into public offices, they embark on frivolous jamborees, stealing and stashing huge  cash in banks and acquire several properties.

    Sagay said about $7.5 billion allegedly stolen by public office holders between 2007 and 2013 would have constructed 635 kilometres of roads, 36 ultra-modern hospitals in each state, fund the education of 3,974 children from primary to tertiary level and build 20,062 units of two-bedroom houses.

    The PACAC chairman observed that “irrepressible frustration” drove young Nigerians to dare the Mediterranean Sea and Sahara Desert to seek greener pasture.

    He said: “As far as Harvard, the Cambridge, Oxford University and other Ivy League schools across the world are populated by children of wealthy Nigerian elite, the dangerous expeditions to Europe by disillusioned youths will not be checked.”

    Sagay appealed to the judiciary to support the anti-corruption war of the Federal Government by speedily adjudicating on corruption cases.

    CAMPUSLIFE gathered that 62 out of the 3,741 graduating students finished with a First Class. The Vice-Chancellor, Prof Abdullahi Bala, said the institution had achieved remarkable feats in the areas of research, academic performance and infrastructure despite challenges.

    The VC advised the graduands to “enterprisingly” apply the knowledge they acquired in school and be job-creators.

    The immediate past Students’ Union Government (SUG) president, Lateef Hamza, who was among the First Class graduands, told CAMPUSLIFE that he set his priorities from the outset, which enabled him combine union activities with academics.

    He said: “It is absolutely amazing to graduate with a brilliant result. Obviously, it was sheer determination, hard work and prayer that made this feat possible.”

    Goodwill messages were received from the university Pro-chancellor, Prof Femi Odekunle, Niger State Governor, Alhaji Abubakar Sani Bello, and the Executive Secretary of the National Universities Commission (NUC), Prof Abubakar Rasheed, who represented the Visitor, President Muhammadu Buhari, at the event.

     

     

  • Magu: I don’t expect judgment to stand – Sagay

    Magu: I don’t expect judgment to stand – Sagay

    Senior lawyers yesterday expressed different views on the status of Ibrahim Magu as Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) following yeaterday’s judgment of a Federal High Court in Abuja.

    Justice J. T. Tsoho said the senate acted within the law when it screened and rejected Magu’s nomination as EFCC chairman.

    Prof Itse Sagay SAN, Seyi Sowemimo SAN, Festus Keyamo SAN and Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Vice President Monday Onyekachi Ubani offered their thoughts pending when they read the full judgment.

    Sagay said: “I don’t expect that the judgment will have an effect on Ibrahim Magu’s status as Acting EFCC Chairman. I don’t expect that there’s anything externally that is going to affect Magu’s position.

    “I don’t know whether the judge considered Section 171 of the Constitution which even allows the President to appoint heads of agencies like Magu’s agency without any reference to the Senate. That is already there, so I don’t know what was brought to the court’s attention. When we see the full judgment we will be able to express our opinion.

    Sowemimo observed, among others, that in the event that the ruling includes a court order removing Magu from office, he would probably seek a stay of execution and launch an appeal.

    Keyamo noted, among others, the law did not prescribe a time limit for Magu to remain in an acting capacity.

    Keyamo said: The fact that the law has not circumscribed the amount of time or the time period that someone can act as the head of an agency, it would mean therefore that I see no legal problem at all in Ibrahim Magu continuing to act as the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, there is no legal impediment at all.”

    But Ubani advised the Executive to “respect and obey the judgement of the

    Federal High Court unless they have secured a contrary judgement from the appellate courts.”

  • Let’s build on Buhari/Osinbajo integrity, says Sagay

    Let’s build on Buhari/Osinbajo integrity, says Sagay

    Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption, Prof. Itse Sagay has urged Nigerians to “stay with President Muhammadu Buhari and vice President Yemi Osinbajo” if the country was to get to the promise land.

    “Buhari and Osinbajo have absolute integrity; if we don’t use them now, I don’t know when next we will have leaders like them, “he said.

    He urged the Federal Government to apply strength and discipline in operating the democratic dispensation to speedily develop the country.

    Sagay spoke yesterday at the 27th Convocation Lecture of the Federal University  of Technology Minna with the title ” Nigeria: The Travails of An Animal Kingdom.”

    He said that Lee Kuan Yew applied the method in Singapore and rescued the country from poverty, misery, chaos and underdevelopment by being firm and determined in the use of power.

    He said that today Singapore was a first world country and a popular destination for Nigerians.

    ” Nigeria is not yet ready for operation of a liberal democracy. All we have done is to abuse, abuse and abuse again; all the privileges of rule of law, human rights and democracy are conferred on us by the constitution.

    ” We must now utilise our creative powers to operate our constitution without giving room for all these abuses.”

    “We need democracy, not democrazy we are operating now where all members of a legislative chamber will abandon the chamber and accompany one other member, charged with criminal offence, to intimidate a lawful tribunal.

    He said that this act had two implications: endorsement of alleged infraction and abandonment of duties for which enormous remunerations had been self awarded.

    ” We cannot have a situation in which the legislature, in a feat of petulance, rejects every bill, refuses to confirm executive nomination, postpones consideration of the budget and refuses to consider it because the executive will not be dictated to regarding the officials it appoints to carry out executive responsibilities.

    ” We cannot tolerate a situation in which 30-60 Senior Advocates of Nigeria accompany a colleague under trial to court in order to intimidate the trial judge. That is gross misconduct on the part of senior advocates.”

  • Sagay: Obasanjo’s comments insulting, inappropriate

    Sagay: Obasanjo’s comments insulting, inappropriate

    •Agbakoba: Buhari has nothing to offer •Falana: statement a wake-up call •Ubani: letter overdue

    Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) chairman Prof Itse Sagay (SAN) last night said it was insulting for former President Olusegun Obasanjo to ask President Muhammadu Buhari not to run for second term.

    Sagay urged Obasanjo, who he said sought third term, to show Buhari some “respect”.

    He said: “I saw Obasanjo’s comments and I could not believe my eyes, that a man who tried to get a third term is discouraging someone else from getting a second term. It doesn’t make sense.

    “I think Obasanjo should try and respect other people. He has achieved a lot. He is a great man and I respect him. But he should learn to respect other people and think of them as being, at least, as good as himself.

    “I think it is insulting for a man who wanted third term to tell somebody else not to want second term. It is most inappropriate, and for a former head of state to say so is most improper.”

    But, a former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and leader of the National Intervention Movement (NIM) Dr Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) said President Buhari has nothing more to offer.

    He described Obasanjo’s suggestion for Buhari not to run for second term as “great”.

    Agbakoba said: “It (Obasanjo’s call) is a great idea as Buhari hasn’t anything left to offer. We at the Third Force will build a new coalition to take power.”

    Activist-lawyer Femi Falana (SAN) described Obasanjo’s statement as a wake-up call for President Buhari. He advised the President to shed himself of the influence of “an incompetent and corrupt cabal”.

    Falana said: “President Olusegun Obasanjo’s intervention is a vivid expression of the frustration of the Nigerian people with the Buhari administration.

    “The statement is a clarion call on President Buhari to remove the incompetent and corrupt cabal of power mongers that has hijacked political power from him. Through sheer nepotism and cronism, the regime has lost the massive goodwill that heralded it to power.

    “The success recorded in the fight against insurgency in the northeast zone has been eroded in the wave of kidnapping and reckless killing of unarmed Nigerians by AK47-bearing herdsmen.

    “The success of the fight against corruption and impunity has been rubished by the inability of the regime to remove corrupt public officers.

    “President Obasanjo’s challenge has been taken up by many Nigerians who have already formed a coalition of genuine progressive forces to liberate Nigeria from internal colonialism and imperialist control.”

    Mr. Dele Adesina (SAN), declined to comment on the contents of ex-President Obasanjo’s letter because he considered it a purely political matter, not a legal one.

    He, however, observed that “there’s nothing one can say that will determine whether the President should run or should not run; it is his constitutional right to do so. I don’t want to join in any controversy.”

    Although Vice President, Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Monday Ubani felt Obasanjo’s letter was long overdue, he warned that Obasanjo should not see himself as the determiner of Nigerians’ fate.

    He said only Nigerians could choose who they would vote for.

    Ubani said: “Former President Obasanjo’s letter to President Muhammadu Buhari was long expected and, for coming now, I will say it is even belated.

    “Recall that former President Obasanjo has written such letters to virtually everyone that took over from him and if you will remember such letters were even written to former military leaders like IBB and Abacha.

    “Such scathing and virulent attacks on leaders before and after him are therefore not novel. What is novel is that he did not initiate the attack on President Buhari timeously, due to some personal reasons known to him.

    “However, former president Obasanjo should not allow this idea to get into his head that he has become the ‘power and principality’ that will always determine the political direction of Nigeria. “Nigerians should always know when they are tired of any government and should determine the fate of their leaders, including President Buhari if at all he decides to contest in 2019, and when they so decide it is not because former President Obasanjo instructed them but because they are tired of the ‘Change.’

    “My humble take about Nigeria is that the destiny of Nigeria should not be seen to be in the hands of these supposed ‘powers and principalities’ of Nigerian politics but in the hands of the majority of Nigerians who must always have their way. That is the way for us to go and it is my dream for my dear country.

    “Nigerians will not reject President Buhari in 2019 because former President Obasanjo said so but because President Buhari may have wittingly or unwittingly rejected Nigerians. He alone by now should know his status with Nigerians. A word is enough for the wise.”

    Former member, Ogun State Judicial Service Commission, Abayomi Omoyinmi described the letter as one-sided.

    Omoyinmi said: “President Obasanjo is entitled to his opinion on how he has perceived President Buhari. The fact of the matter is that every individual has his or her own way of approach to governance as it’s in this case. Ex-President Obasanjo has only highlighted what he believed are President Buhari’s flaws in his style of governance.

    “I am of the opinion that the content in the letter is one sided in that it lacked constructive criticism, because Obasanjo failed to at least highlight the good things that have been achieved by President Buhari within just three years and under an extremely difficult circumstances created by many years of previous administration misrule.”

  • PACAC to monitor corruption cases, says Sagay

    PACAC to monitor corruption cases, says Sagay

    The Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) yesterday said it would deploy monitors of high profile corruption cases.

    Its chairman Prof Itse Sagay (SAN) praised the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) Justice Walter Onnoghen for directing that special courts for be set up within High Courts to handle only corruption cases.

    The PACAC chairman said they welcomed the Corruption and Financial Crime Cases Trial Monitoring Committee set up by the CJN, but has reservations about its composition.

    He spoke at a “Roundtable for Experts on Developing a Template for Tracking and Monitoring Corruption Cases in Nigeria”, organised by PACAC and held at the Transcorp Hilton, Abuja.

    Sagay said PACAC’s monitoring team would complement the CJN’s monitoring committee.

    “We were very happy when the CJN directed that special courts be set up. But we were a little bit downcast when he announced the form of monitoring he wanted.

    “Without criticising them (the committee members) individually – I have nothing against them – but they are too senior. The minute they come into the court to monitor cases, the judge will know who they are, and then the case will not take the natural cause.

    “Secondly, will they have time? Thirdly, many of them are actually defending people in the same circumstances over which the court is presiding. Will they be objective? Those are the issues we raised.

    “That is why we want to complement what the CJN is doing with our own system of monitoring, which we expect to be more efficient and will produce better result.

    “We’re cooperating with the CJN, but we want refine what he has so kindly provided. That’s the reason we’re here. The template for achieving this end is what has brought us here,” Sagay said.

    The eminent professor of law regretted that despite the enactment of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) of 2015, high profile cases still drag for years in court.

    He attributed this to some judges’ lack of firmness and their failure to strictly enforce the law.

    “As I speak, there are 2,003 of such cases still on. They travel from the High Court to the Supreme Court and back to the High Court over an interlocutory matter, such as jurisdiction, defective charge, or other excuses.

    “Good enough, the National Assembly passed this Act. Under normal circumstances, in a normal society, it ought to be effect and would have resulted in a revolutionary change. Cases would have been determined within nine monthsat the most. But that is not happening.

    “Part of the causes is that judges are not taking control of their courts. They are still allowing Senior Advocates particularly to dominate them and almost create a situation where they’re taking dictations from them,” he said.

    According to Sagay, the ACJA provides that cases must be heard day to day, and if it becomes absolutely essential, then 14-day adjournments may be granted.

    “But we’re seeing adjournments being granted for two months,” he said.

     

     

     

     

     

  • PACAC to monitor corruption cases – Sagay

    PACAC to monitor corruption cases – Sagay

    The Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) said on Monday it would monitor high profile corruption cases in the country.

    Its chairman, Prof Itse Sagay (SAN), praised the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Walter Onnoghen, for directing that special courts be set up within High Courts to handle only corruption cases.

    He said PACAC welcomed the Corruption and Financial Crime Cases Trial Monitoring Committee set up by the CJN, but has reservations about its composition.

    He spoke at a “Roundtable for Experts on Developing a Template for Tracking and Monitoring Corruption Cases in Nigeria,” organised by PACAC and held at the Transcorp Hilton, Abuja.

    Sagay said PACAC’s monitoring team would complement the CJN’s monitoring committee.

    He said: “We were very happy when the CJN directed that special courts be set up. But we were a little bit downcast when he announced the form of monitoring he wanted.

    “Without criticising them (the committee members) individually, I have nothing against them. But they are too senior. The minute they come into the court to monitor cases, the judge will know who they are, and then the case will not take the natural cause.

    “Secondly, will they have time? Thirdly, many of them are actually defending people in the same circumstances over which the court is presiding. Will they be objective? Those are the issues we raised.

    “That is why we want to complement what the CJN is doing with our own system of monitoring, which we expect to be more efficient and will produce better result.

    “We are cooperating with the CJN, but we want to refine what he has so kindly provided. That’s the reason we are here. The template for achieving this end is what has brought us here.”

    The eminent professor of law regretted that despite the enactment of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) of 2015, high profile cases still drag for years in court.

    He attributed this to some judges’ lack of firmness and their failure to strictly enforce the law.

    “As I speak, there are 2,003 of such cases still on. They travel from the High Court to the Supreme Court and back to the High Court over an interlocutory matter, such as jurisdiction, defective charge, or other excuses.

    “Good enough, the National Assembly passed this Act. Under normal circumstances, in a normal society, it ought to be effective and would have resulted in a revolutionary change. Cases would have been determined within nine months at the most. But that is not happening.

    “Part of the causes is that judges are not taking control of their courts. They are still allowing Senior Advocates particularly to dominate them and almost create a situation where they’re taking dictations from them,” he added.

  • Sagay: Buhari’s critics over dead men’s appointment are Lilliputians

    Sagay: Buhari’s critics over dead men’s appointment are Lilliputians

    Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC) chairman Prof Itse Sagay (SAN) yesterday slammed those criticising President Muhammadu Buhari and the All Progressives Congress (APC) for naming dead men among board appointees.

    He described the critics as Lilliputians, saying they were idle minds complaining over nothing.

    Sagay said the outrage amounts to making a mountain out of a molehill.

    To him, the Presidency could not be genuinely faulted in the circumstance.

    The professor of law said he was even angry with the Presidency for appearing to be apologetic over the development.

    Sagay told our correspondent: “What I find irritating is the so-called outrage by the Nigerian elite that in a list of almost 3,000 people nominated for various agencies, five or six had died.

    “And there is a general pretence by the Nigerian elite that it was of huge, monumental importance; that it shows incompetence and all that.

    “I ask myself: a list that has been under compilation for over two years, revised and re-revised, do they expect that about 3,000 people would all still be alive after two years?

    “If not, do they expect the Presidency to go knocking from door to door 24 hours before the announcement to ask who was dead or alive, or to ask if they would survive until the announcement? Are they supposed to have done that?

    “So, the whole thing (criticisms) is extremely unreasonable.”

    Sagay said the critics reminded him of Lilliput and Blefuscu, fictional island nations that appear in the first part of the 1726 novel, Gulliver’s Travel,by Jonathan Swift.

    “In the book, the nations are inhabited by tiny people who are about one-twelfth the height of ordinary humans. They went to war. What did they go to war for?

    “Lilliput believes an egg should be broken from the small end before it is eaten, while Belfuscu believes it should be broken from the big end.

    “This gives the impression that the Nigerian elite are filled with Lilliputians, who quarrel over nothing and ignore major issues of importance. And I call this collective stupidity and idleness of the mind,” Sagay said.

    Asked if the Presidency should not have verified the list and ensured the appointees were ready, and whether he was absolving the Presidency of blame completely, Sagay said: “I am absolving them of every blame.

    “And I am very annoyed with the Presidency for looking apologetic over it. As I said, we’re talking about 3,000 people.

    “At what stage should they be checking? Can they verify 3,000 names in 24 hours? Suppose they do it one week before announcement and someone died in-between? Is it their fault too?

    “So, since nobody can guarantee life, out of 3,000 within two years, there is nothing unreasonable about that.

    “Those vacancies will be filled, and Nigerians should stop quarrelling over nothing and start taking on more important things. They should not behave like idle minds.”

    The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), former Education Minister Dr Oby Ezekwesili, the lawmaker representing Kaduna Central Senatorial District, Senator Shehu Sani, and the President of the Campaign for Democracy (CD), Usman Abdul, are among those who criticised President Buhari and the APC for including names of dead men on the boards’ list.

    ACF’s National Publicity Secretary Alhaji Muhammad Biu said: “The recent appointments of persons into various boards of parastatals and agencies of the Federal Government by the Presidency, where names of dead persons appeared on the list as published by the media clearly shows that due diligence was not employed.

    “The ACF, therefore, calls for proper screening of persons being considered for appointment into various departments and agencies of government in order to avoid such embarrassing incident.”

    Dr. Ezekwesili, in a series of tweets, said she was disappointed by the Presidency.

    “Some ‘mistakes’ are simply indefensible. Who is that defending that a significant # (2, 3 or 4? Which? ) of dead people are on an appointment list of the FG .@AsoRock that the President, @MBuhari signed off on? Haba. This is the height of what Feyi calls, “anyhowness.” #Tragic,” she stated.

    PDP spokesman Kola Ologbondiyan said the error confirmed the party’s position that the APC “administration is completely confused, disorganised and grossly incompetent”.

    “Nigerians can now see why the nation’s economy has been in shambles in the last two years. When we say that this government is completely inept, some Nigerians did not know to which level, but now they do.

    “This inability to tidy up a simple issue of list of 209 appointees has completely exposed the extent the APC government is bereft of simple organisational skills to manage a country like Nigeria, which is in dire need of development,” PDP said.

     

  • Buhari’s criticism over dead appointees unreasonable – Sagay

    Buhari’s criticism over dead appointees unreasonable – Sagay

    The Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), on Monday slammed those criticising President Muhammadu Buhari and the All Progressives Congress (APC) for naming dead men among appointees into boards of Federal Government agencies.

    He described the critics as Lilliputians, saying they were idle minds complaining over nothing.

    Sagay said the outrage by some members of the elite amounts to making a mountain out of a molehill.

    To him, the Presidency could not be genuinely faulted in the circumstance.

    The professor of law said he was even angry with the Presidency for appearing to be apologetic over the development.

    Sagay said: “What I find irritating is the so-called outrage by the Nigerian elite that in a list of almost 3,000 people nominated for various agencies, five or six had died.

    “And there is a general pretense by the Nigerian elite that it was of huge, monumental importance; that it shows incompetence and all that.

    “I ask myself: a list that has been under compilation for over two years, revised and re-revised, do they expect that about 3,000 people would all still be alive after two years?

    “If not, do they expect the Presidency to go knocking from door to door 24 hours before the announcement to ask who was dead or alive, or to ask if they would survive until the announcement? Are they supposed to have done that?

    “So, the whole thing (criticisms) is extremely unreasonable.”