Tag: Saleh Mamman

  • Alleged N33.8bn fraud: ‘Provide your defence,’ Court tells ex-Power Minister Mamman

    Alleged N33.8bn fraud: ‘Provide your defence,’ Court tells ex-Power Minister Mamman

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has told a former Minister of Power, Saleh Mamman, that he has a case to answer in relation to the N33.8billion money laundering case brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Mamman served as the Minister of Power between August 2019 and September 2021.

    Justice James Omotosho, in a ruling on Thursday, overruled the no-case submission made by Mamman and held that the prosecution had sufficiently established a prima facie case against him to warrant the court to request that he enter a defence.

    Justice Omotosho held that the evidence tendered was such that the defendant must proffer some explanations or put in a defence to the allegation made against him, especially considering the seriousness of the offences.

    He noted that Mamman was still innocent until his guilt is established by the prosecution.

    Justice Omotosho ordered Mamman to open his defence in line with Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution to give explanations on some of the evidence tendered by the EFCC.

    The judge said, “I have carefully gone through the evidence presented to the court by the prosecution with respect to this charge.

    “The evidence all points to the establishment of a prima facie case against the defendant.

    “The evidence is such that the defendant must proffer some explanation or defence to the allegation made against them, especially considering the seriousness of the offences.

    “This court will refrain from evaluating the evidence but will limit itself to stating that on the whole, a prima facie case has been made out against the defendant.

    “This is not to say that the defendant is guilty as charged; put simply, that he be afforded his right to a fair hearing and put in his defence before this court.

    “The evidence of the prosecution has founded sufficient ground for proceeding with this trial.

    “A connection of the defendant with the offence, no matter how slight, constitutes prima facie evidence and as such the defendant would be required to enter his defence to the charge or a rebuttal of some sort,” the judge said.

    He further held that holding that a prima facie case has been established did not necessarily imply that the court found the defendant guilty of the charge.

    The judge added: “It is simply to allow the defendant to exhaust his options for his defence and to clear every unresolved issue which may weigh on the mind of the court in reaching a final decision.

    “The defendant is still presumed innocent until proven guilty, and the prosecution still has the duty to prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt,” he said, citing Section 135 (1) Evidence Act, 2011.”

    The judge added that the right of a defendant to defend himself orvherself is a fundamental right provided under Section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

    He added, “Such right cannot be taken from a defendant except where a defendant expressly or by conduct waives the same.”

    The judge held that, in a criminal trial, a defendant can elect to rest his case on the prosecution’s case, enter his defence, or make a no-case submission.

    “This defendant, having not waived his right to defend himself either expressly or by conduct, and the no-case submission made by him having been overruled, he is hereby called upon to put in his defence to the charge against him.

    “In conclusion, the address of counsel, no matter how beautifully constructed, cannot take the place of evidence.

    “Based on the fundamental right to fair hearing as contained in Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution, which the defendant is entitled to, this court is inclined to give him the opportunity and afford him his fundamental right to fair hearing.

    “Consequently, the no-case submission is overruled, and the defendant is hereby ordered to enter his defence and make some explanations as to the charge and evidence made by the prosecution,” the judge said.

    He subsequently adjourned till February 23, 2026, for defence.

    Mamman is accused by the EFCC, in a 12-count charge of diverting N33,804,830,503.73 released for the Mambilla and Zungeru Hydroelectric Power Plant Projects by the Federal Government.

    The EFCC said the offence was contrary to Sections 18(a), 15(2)(b) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended), and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.

    Some counts in the charge sheet, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/273/2024, read:

    *That you, Saleh Mamman (male), sometime in 2019, in Abuja, whilst you were the Minister of Power, conspired with other officials of your ministry and some private companies to indirectly convert the total sum of N=33,804,830,503.73 through various private companies which sums you reasonably ought to have known formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activity, to wit: criminal breach of trust about the funds released for the Mambilla and Zungeru Hydroelectric Power Plant Projects by the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    *That you, Saleh Mamman (male), sometime in December 2019, in Abuja, conspired with Samson Bitrus to make a cash payment of US$655,700:00 to Mohiba Investment Ltd. (acting through Mohammed Asheik Jidda), without going through a financial institution.

  • Alleged N33.8b fraud: Court admits ex-Power Minister Mamman’s confessional statement

    Alleged N33.8b fraud: Court admits ex-Power Minister Mamman’s confessional statement

    • Says it was voluntarily made by defendant

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has admitted in evidence the confessional statement made by former Minister of Power, Engr Saleh Mamman, while being investigated over the N33.8 billion money laundering case brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Justice James Omotosho, in a ruling yesterday, dismissed the objection raised by Mamman to the admissibility of the statement he made on February 20, 2024 and eight other statements.

    The ruling was on the trial-within-trial conducted by the court following claim by the ex-minister that he did not make the statement of February 20, 2024 voluntarily and that he was not supplied with video recordings of the sessions where he made the other eight statements.

    Justice Omotosho upheld that case of the prosecution that the defendant volunteered the statement of February 20, 2024 after the words of caution were administered to him as required.

    The judge held that, as against the defendant’s claim that he was not in a good frame of mind when he was asked to make the statement of February 20, 2024, there was no evidence to support such claim.

    He found that although the ex-minister claimed to be ill on the said day, he did not ask to be excused, but instead, he directed his lawyer, Mohammed Ahmed, to write the statement for him while he dictated what should be written.

    The judge also rejected the defendant’s claim that he was not sure his lawyer wrote exactly what he dictated and that the lawyer could have added other information outside what he dictated.

    Justice Omotosho wondered why the ex-minister, who had promised to call the said lawyer as his witness in the trial-within-trial, failed to do so when he had the opportunity.

    Read Also: Alleged N33.8b fraud: Court admits ex-power minister Mamman’s confessional statement

    The judge held that as against the defendant’s claim that he was forced to make the said statement, a video recording of the statement taking session, which was played in court showed that he was relaxed and smiling with his interrogators.

    He said the conduct of the defendant amounted to a classic case of the trying to deny his confessional statement, which he voluntarily made.

    The judge also faulted the ex-minister’s contention that the prosecution’s failure to provide him with the video recordings of the sessions where he made other statements amounted to being denied adequate materials to prepare for his defence.

    Justice Omotosho said he ought to have applied to the court to order the prosecution to provide him with all the materials he requires if indeed he actually wanted them.

    The judge held that the right to adequate facilities to prepare defence is not automatic, adding that he was to apply to the court to order the prosecution to make the video available to him; an option he failed to take.

    Justice Omotosho found that the ex-minister failed to prove that he was forced to make the confessional statement, adding that his complaint that he was not given the video recordings was belated.

    He proceeded to admit the nine statements in evidence and adjourned till November 3 for continuation of trial.

    Apart from the statement he made on February 20, 2024, other statements admitted by the court included those the defendant made on May 10, 2023; May 11, 2023; May 12, 2023; May 15, 2023; May 17, 2023; May 19, 2023; August 3, 2023 and August 29, 2023.

    Mamman, who was a minister under former President Muhammadu Buhari from 2019 to 2021, was accused by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in a 12-count charge of diverting N33,804,830,503.73 released for the Mambilla and Zungeru Hydroelectric Power Plant Projects by the Federal Government.

    The EFCC said the offence was contrary to Sections 18(a), 15(2)(b) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended), and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.

    Some counts in the charge sheet read:

    *That you, Saleh Mamman (male), sometime in 2019, in Abuja, whilst you were the Minister of Power, conspired with other officials of your ministry and some private companies to indirectly convert the total sum of N=33,804,830,503.73 through various private companies which sums you reasonably ought to have known formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activity, to wit: criminal breach of trust about the funds released for the Mambilla and Zungeru Hydroelectric Power Plant Projects by the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    *That you, Saleh Mamman (male), sometime in December 2019, in Abuja, conspired with Samson Bitrus to make a cash payment of US$655,700:00 to Mohiba Investment Ltd. (acting through Mohammed Asheik Jidda), without going through a financial institution.

  • Alleged N33.8b fraud: Court admits ex-power minister Mamman’s confessional statement

    Alleged N33.8b fraud: Court admits ex-power minister Mamman’s confessional statement

    …says it was voluntarily made by defendant

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has admitted in evidence the confessional statement made by former Minister of Power, Saleh Mamman, while being investigated over the N33.8billion money laundering case brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Justice James Omotosho, in a ruling on Friday, dismissed the objection raised by Mamman to the admissibility of the statement he made on February 20, 2024, and eight other statements.

    The ruling was on the trial-within-trial conducted by the court following a claim by the ex-minister that he did not make the statement of February 20, 2024, voluntarily and that he was not supplied with video recordings of the sessions where he made the other eight statements.

    Justice Omotosho upheld that case of the prosecution that the defendant volunteered the statement of February 20, 2024, after the words of caution were administered to him as required.

    The judge held that, as against the defendant’s claim that he was not in a good frame of mind when he was asked to make the statement of February 20, 2024, there was no evidence to support such a claim.

    He found that although the ex-minister claimed to be ill on the said day, he did not ask to be excused, but instead, he directed his lawyer, Mohammed Ahmed, to write the statement for him, while he dictated what should be written.

    READ ALSO: INEC denies breaching court order, dismisses report of arrest warrant for ex-chairman Yakubu

    The judge also rejected the defendant’s claim that he was not sure his lawyer wrote exactly what he dictated and that the lawyer could have added other information outside of what he dictated.

    Justice Omotosho wondered why the ex-minister, who had promised to call the said lawyer as his witness in the trial-within-trial, failed to do so when he had the opportunity.

    The judge held that, as against the defendant’s claim that he was forced to make the said statement, a video recording of the statement-taking session, which was played in court, showed that he was relaxed and smiling with his interrogators.

    He said the conduct of the defendant amounted to a classic case of the defendant trying to deny his confessional statement, which he voluntarily made.

    The judge also faulted the ex-minister’s contention that the prosecution’s failure to provide him with the video recordings of the sessions where he made other statements amounted to being denied adequate materials to prepare for his defence.

    Justice Omotosho said he ought to have applied to the court to order the prosecution to provide him with all the materials he required if indeed he actually wanted them.

    The judge held that the right to adequate facilities to prepare a defence is not automatic, adding that he was to apply to the court to order the prosecution to make the video available to him, an option he failed to take.

    Justice Omotosho found that the ex-minister failed to prove that he was forced to make the confessional statement, adding that his complaint that he was not given the video recordings was belated.

    He proceeded to admit the nine statements in evidence and adjourned till November 3 for the continuation of the trial.

    Apart from the statement he made on February 20, 2024, other statements admitted by the court included those the defendant made on May 10, 2023; May 11, 2023; May 12, 2023; May 15, 2023; May 17, 2023; May 19, 2023; August 3, 2023, and August 29, 2023.

    Mamman, who was a minister under former President Muhammadu Buhari from 2019 to 2021, was accused by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in a 12-count charge of diverting N33,804,830,503.73 released for the Mambilla and Zungeru Hydroelectric Power Plant Projects by the Federal Government.

    The EFCC said the offence was contrary to Sections 18(a), 15(2)(b) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended), and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.

    Some counts in the charge sheet read:

    *That you, Saleh Mamman (male), sometime in 2019, in Abuja, whilst you were the Minister of Power, conspired with other officials of your ministry and some private companies to indirectly convert the total sum of N=33,804,830,503.73 through various private companies which sums you reasonably ought to have known formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activity, to wit: criminal breach of trust about the funds released for the Mambilla and Zungeru Hydroelectric Power Plant Projects by the Federal Government of Nigeria.

    *That you, Saleh Mamman (male), sometime in December 2019, in Abuja, conspired with Samson Bitrus to make a cash payment of US$655,700:00 to Mohiba Investment Ltd. (acting through Mohammed Asheik Jidda), without going through a financial institution.

  • ‘N33.8b fraud’: Mamman accuses lawyer of misrepresenting his statement to EFCC

    ‘N33.8b fraud’: Mamman accuses lawyer of misrepresenting his statement to EFCC

    A former Minister of Power, Saleh Mamman, has said his lawyer misrepresented him in the statements he made to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

    Mamman faces a 12-count charge over alleged money laundering connected with the Zungeru and Mambilla hydroelectric power projects.

    The EFCC is prosecuting the former minister over alleged conspiracy to launder N33.8 billion.

    Giving evidence as the first defence witness during a trial-within-trial on Wednesday, Mamman said he went to the EFCC’s office on February 20, 2025, with his lawyer, Mohammed Ahmed, when the commission’s prosecutors interviewed him.

    During cross-examination by prosecution lawyer, Rotimi Oyedepo, the former minister admitted that he authorised Ahmed to write his statements on his behalf.

    Read Also: EFCC arrests 34 suspected internet fraudsters in Ibadan

    But Mamman alleged that his lawyer fabricated some portions of the statement, saying he was not sure everything written reflected what he actually said.

    When asked to identify the fabricated portion of the statement from the exhibits, Mamman said he could not remember.

    The former minister acknowledged that at the time of his invitation, he was neither maltreated nor threatened with imprisonment by the EFCC officials.

    The presiding judge, James Omotosho, adjourned the matter till July 15 for the adoption of written addresses.

  • Ex-minister on N33.8b fraud trial collapses outside courtroom

    Ex-minister on N33.8b fraud trial collapses outside courtroom

    • Court orders his remand in Kuje

    Former Power Minister Saleh Mamman had his arraignment shifted from morning till afternoon yesterday after he collapsed in front of the courtroom at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

    He was resuscitated and treated by the medical personnel of the Federal High Court, his lawyer Femi Ate (SAN), told trial Judge, Justice James Omotosho

    The former minister, who was later arraigned in a 12-count charge bordering on money laundering-related offences, was ordered to be remanded in Kuje Prison in Abuja, pending the consideration of his bail application.

    Justice Omotosho issued the order after Mamman’s arraignment.

    Read Also: FULL LIST: 20 States with local government caretaker committees

    In the amended charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/273/2024, the ex-minister is alleged to have laundered over N33.804 billion and acquired properties through proxies.

    He pleaded not guilty to the charge brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), following which the prosecuting lawyer, Olumide Fusika (SAN), sought a date for the commencement of trial.

    The defendant’s lawyer said he filed a bail application shortly before the court resumed sitting.

    Although Fusika admitted being served with the bail application around 12:30pm, Justice Omotosho noted that the application was not yet in the court’s file.

    Ate prayed to be allowed to return the next day to argue the bail application, which request Fusika did not oppose.

    The judge then adjourned till today for the hearing of the bail application and ordered that the defendant be remanded in the Kuje Correctional Center.

    The defendant, who the lawyer said was ill, looked dejected while stepping off the dock, shortly after the judge’s pronouncement.

    Dressed in brown kaftan and a cap, Mamman was subsequently led out of the courtroom by prison officials.

    His lawyer told the court about Mamman’s indisposition at the first mention of the case, following which the judge halted proceedings.

    When the case was again called, the ex-minister walked into the courtroom and later into the dock.

    The upper part of his clothe was wet, prompting the judge to asked if he was sweating or whether it was raining outside.

    Responding, Mamman said water was poured on him when he collapsed.

    Fusika then intervened, saying although the case was for arraignment; he learnt there was a development outside the courtroom.

    The prosecuting lawyer said he had discussion with the defence lawyer outside the courtroom concerning the defendant’s state of health.

    Fusika added: “I was informed of an incident outside. I will want my learner senior advocate to tell the honourable court himself.”

    Ate told the court that, his client, on being brought into the premises of the court collapsed and had to be resuscitated and treated by the medical personnel of the Federal High Court.

    He added that the ex-Minister was served with the charge after he was resuscitated.

    Ate said he sought Fusika’s understanding for an adjournment so that the arraignment could be done on Monday when his client would have been better.

    Justice Omotosho noted that if the matter is adjourned, the arraignment would only be possible in September in view of the court’s workload.

    Ate subsequently withdrew request for adjournment, following which Fusika introduced his amended charge and sought to have it ready to the defendant.

    Justice Omotosho then, turned to the defendant and asked him if he was fit enough to take his plea, to which Mamman said yes. 

    The defendant then told the court that he collapsed outside the courtroom because of the drugs he took.

    He said he did not eat before taking the drugs, adding that while he was outside the courtroom, waiting to be called in, his blood pressure dropped, which accounted for what happened.

    Mamman, however, said he was fit to continue with the arraignment.

    “It can happen to anyone,” the judge noted and suspended proceedings to enable the prosecution amend the initial charge sheet where the defendant was wrongly identified.

    The proceedings later resumed around 1pm.

    In the amended charge, the defendant is  also accused of conspiring with staff of the ministry in charge of the accounts of the Zungeru and Mambilla Hydro Electric Power projects to divert about N22 billion.