Tag: Saraki

  • Why Saraki should go

    SIR: I always wonder if Nigerians are not tired of being citizens of the country where anything goes. In March 2015, we voted for Change, but it’s obvious we are not ready for it because if we are, Dr Bukola Saraki will not double as an occupant of the ‘Accused Box’ at the Code of Conduct Tribunal and as president of the highest law making body in the country, the Nigerian Senate. That’s an affront to over 170 million highly esteemed occupants of “Office of the Citizen.” It is a desecration of the hallowed chamber. And if we cannot rise to protect the integrity of the National Assembly, what then is left of our democracy?

    Considering the staggering revelations being made at the ongoing trial of the senate president which commenced on Tuesday, April 6, the country’s number three man should have stepped aside. According to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)’s witnesses, Saraki allegedly laundered several millions and has several undeclared assets in Nigeria and abroad. Saraki had been accused of offences ranging from anticipatory declaration of assets, foreign accounts ownership to false declaration of assets in the forms he filed before the Code of Conduct Bureau while he was governor of Kwara State.

    Saying he should step aside as leader of the Nigerian Senate is not an option, it’s a necessity. This will allow him face his trial, and put an end to all sorts of distraction— for instance, the lawmakers couldn’t hold plenary session because their leader was at the CCT— and save the Senate of further embarrassment..

    Nigerian politicians are always quick to compare the country’s democracy with those of developed countries, yet they refuse to do so when the odds are unfavourable. If it were saner climes, Saraki would have been forced to resign even if he refused to do so honourably. In the United States, Charlotte Mayor Patrick Cannon resigned the evening he was arrested for public corruption charges in March 2014.

    Just last year, the Guatemalan President, Otto Perez Molina, resigned following his alleged involvement in massive corruption scandal. Days after widespread calls for his removal, the Prime Minister of Iceland, Sigmundur Gunnlaugsson, eventually announced his resignation following the recent Panama Papers leaks which linked him to an offshore company. Why can’t Nigerians massively demand that Saraki steps down?

    I’m not in any way suggesting that the senate president is guilty of the criminal charges slammed on him; that’s left for the CCT to determine. As it stands, the senate president is expected to prove, before the tribunal, that the 13-count charge of corruption leveled against him are false and as such shame his “witch-hunters”, if there are any.

    For the sake of personal integrity, this is the time for Bukola Saraki to match words with action. He has reiterated severally that he’s a man of integrity who is ready to fight corruption to a standstill. Here’s that great opportunity for him to prove to Nigerians that he has no skeleton in his cupboard. Having said that he has a clear conscience, he should step aside to attend to the criminal allegations against him. When he eventually has his day in court, he will garner more respect from Nigerians and the National Assembly will be strengthened. This will definitely help deepen the country’s democracy.

    However, if he is convicted as a sitting senate president, the consequences will be damaging not only to his reputation and political stature, but also to the standing of Nigeria in the comity of nations. Notably, this will go a long way in undermining the National Assembly.

    We hope to see a country that does not encourage impunity; one where the right thing is done at the right time, where appropriate sanctions are applied when laws are broken. We want ours to be a nation where law is no respecter of persons no matter how highly placed they are in the society. And that’s real Change!

     

    • Kofoworola Ayodeji,

    kennydamola@yahoo.com

  • Saraki earns N1.2m pensions monthly, says Kwara govt

    Saraki earns N1.2m pensions monthly, says Kwara govt

    The Kwara State Government yesterday said Senate President Bukola Saraki is paid N1.2 million monthly as pension but denied paying its former governor salary after he left office in May 2011.

    A statement by Secretary to the State Government (SSG), Alhaji Isiaka Gold, said Dr. Saraki’s last salary was N291,474.00 , paid to him in May 2011.

    He added: “From June 2011, former Governor Saraki started receiving his pension, which was N578,188.00 as other past governors in the country”.

    The statement added that after the review of pensions of former political office holders by the State Pension Board, the former governor’s pension increased to N1,239,493.94 monthly from October 2014 to date.

    Also yesterday, the Director General of the Abubakar Bukola Saraki Constituency Office, aka  Mandate, Hon. Abdulwahab Isa,said since the former governor left office in May 2011, his pension, which was paid into a special account, has been managed by a group of trustees and used for education endowment for students across the state.

    In a statement in Ilorin, Isa said Saraki had no access to the account. He said a group of trustees led by him, was mandated to spend the money on scholarship grants and funds for Joint Admission and Matriculation Board ((JAMB) forms for students across the state.

    “We have also used the money to pay for coaching of students who were preparing for JAMB examinations. For example, the most recent beneficiaries from the funds were two University of Ilorin Faculty of Law students who were the best in their set and needed money for their enrolment into the Nigerian Law School.”

    Isa added that the funds from the pension account had been utilised in fulfilment of a pledge publicly made by Dr. Saraki to the people.

  • Mark, Messi, Saraki, others named in secret assets leak

    Mark, Messi, Saraki, others named in secret assets leak

    Senate President: it’s my wife’s family assets

    Senate President Bukola Saraki was battling yesterday to fend off what looked like a fresh allegation about his assets. He said he fully complied with the provisions of the law on declaration of assets by public officers.

    The former Kwara State governor was reacting to the claim contained in the Panama Papers, a huge trove of documents by the offshore provider, Mossack Fonseca, and shared by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) that he failed to declare assets belonging to his wife, Mrs Toyin Saraki, in secret offshore territories. , He noted that he has in his various assets declarations included properties owned individually by himself and his wife.

    Saraki is not the only prominent Nigerian named in the document. There are also former Delta State Governor James Ibori, Saraki’s brother Laolu, his associate Obi Asika and Olufela Ibidapo.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin’s associates are named. So are South African President Jacob Zuma, soccer star Lionel Messi and son of former Ghanian President John Kufuor .

    Saraki’s statement, signed by his Special Adviser (Media and Public Affairs) Yusuph Olaniyonu, said the property in question formed part of his wife’s family assets.

    It said: “The property in question forms part of Dr. Saraki’s wife’s family asset. It is public knowledge that Mrs. Saraki comes from a family of independent means and wealth with numerous and varied assets acquired over decades in family estates and investments.

    “Furthermore, the law only requires a public officer to declare both his own assets and those held by his spouse and his children under 18 years of age. The law does not require a public officer to declare assets held by the spouse’s family.

    “It is not expected by the law that a public officer should declare such assets held in the spouse’s family estate.

    “Indeed, the Code of Conduct form does not make provision for declaration of spouse’s family assets.”

    But the report in the  Panama Papers alleged that at least four assets belonging to the Saraki family, tucked away in secret offshore territories, have been uncovered.

    It alleged that the Senate President failed to declare them to the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) as required by Nigerian laws.

    This revelation obtained by the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and shared by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) with Premium Times and over 100 other media partners in 82 countries, comes as Saraki battles to extricate himself from allegations of corruption.

    The Senate President’s case before the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) is due to begin in Abuja today.

    In a written response to ICIJ, the Senate President insisted, through his UK lawyers, that he “declared his assets properly in accordance with the relevant legislation,” and that the charges against him “are both unfounded and politically motivated”.

    Last September, the CCB slammed false assets declaration charges on Saraki, accusing the Senate President of among other things, failure to declare his assets in full.

    In his declaration form,  Saraki listed property owned by his wife, Toyin Saraki, to include a plot of land at Lekki valued at N5 million, which he said was a gift received in January 1989.

    Mrs. Saraki was also listed as owner of a property at 15 Bryanston Square, London W1 and 69 Bourne Street, London.

    While the first, which rental income was put at £48,000 with a value of £900,000, was acquired in January 1989, the second, which value was put at £2m and had rental value of £150,000, was acquired for business in April 2000.

    However, a fresh investigation by Premium Times and its media partners, has uncovered a hidden London property in the name of Toyin Saraki but which was left out among the assets declared by the Senate President.

    The hidden property is located at #8 Whuttaker Street, Belgravia, London SW1W 8JQ. It has title number NGL802235.

    Similarly, the Senate President stated in his assets declaration form that his wife held an account in EcoBank, Broad Street, Lagos, where she had N1.5 million at the time he became governor in 2003.

    She also maintained an account in Coutts & Co Strand, London, where she owned £450,000 and $125,000 in addition to $3 million in Northern Trust International Banking Corporation Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner.

    Mrs. Saraki was also listed as maintaining substantial shares in European and American Trading Company, Tyberry Corporation and Eficaz Limited just as she held 500,000 shares, valued at £500,000 at P.C.C (U.K) Ltd. He was, however, silent on the number of shares the former first lady had in Haussmann and Tiny Tee (Nig) Limited.

    Three additional overseas assets in the name of the wife of the Senate President were hidden from the authorities and are missing from the assets declaration form, a report said.

    Investigations reveal that Mrs. Saraki owns secret companies in some tax havens.

    The hidden assets

    The first, Girol Properties Ltd, was registered on August 25, 2004 (a year after Mrs. Saraki’s husband became governor of Nigeria’s north-central state of Kwara) in the British Virgin Island (BVI).

    Company documents show that Mrs. Saraki owns 25,000 shares with a par value of US$ 1,00 each, and was appointed the first and only director of the company.

    It however remains unclear what businesses Mrs Saraki transacted with the company. Mrs Saraki, however, in a letter to ICIJ, through her lawyers, denies ever owning any shareholding in Girol Properties

    The second company, Sandon Development Limited, was registered in Seychelles Island on January 12, 2011 and has Mrs. Saraki and Babatunde Morakinyo (a long-term personal aide and friend of Saraki) of 11 Okeme Street, Lagos, as shareholders.

    Incorporating that company, documents show, Mrs. Saraki bought a curious service from Mossack Fonseca & Co, the Panamanian firm that helped her to register the firm.

    Perhaps to avoid being identified as the beneficial owner of Sandon, the Senate President’s wife asked Fonsecca to provide nominee directors for the company. Nominee directors are sometimes used in tax havens to conceal real owners of companies and assets.

    She then made an undertaking indemnifying the Panamanian company “in respect of all claims, demands, actions, suits, proceedings, costs and expenses whatsoever as may be incurred or become payable by you in respect of or arising out of any member or employee or associate of your company or associated companies holding any office, directorship or shareholdings in the company or by reason of or in consequence of any act or decision made by any such person or company in connection with the management and/or administration of the said company.”

    Shortly after the company was incorporated, Mrs. Saraki used it in July 2011 to buy the property on Whuttaker Street, Belgravia, London SW1W 8JQ.

    The property, acquired from Renocon Property Limited, a company registered in the British Virgin Island, was never disclosed to Nigerian authorities as required by the country’s code of conduct law.

    The third hidden company in the name of Mrs. Saraki is Landfield International Developments Ltd., a company registered in the British Virgin Islands on April 8, 2014. Its registration number is 1819394

    While its registered office is 1 Akara Blog., 24 De Castro Street, Wickhams Cay 1, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Island.

    According to Mossack Fonseca, the registered agent of the company, Mrs. Saraki, at least until January 27, 2015, was sole shareholder and beneficial owner of the company which had two nominee directors – Glaisd Alie Limited and NewGombe Limited – both appointed on September 2, 2014. Its agent says Landfield is authorised to issue a maximum of 50,000 no par value shares.

    Mrs. Saraki said she sold her shares in the company to a third party in January last year.

    Mr. Laolu Saraki is said to own Polly Capital Holdings Ltd registered in Niue, a small island nation in the South Pacific Ocean.

    Another document showed that after some years, Laolu brought in another person as co-owner. The company is now co-owned with a certain Richard Pembroke, who has 25,000 equity shares, just like Laolu.

    Laolu’s other offshore companies are co-owned with his associates. Among the co-owners are Kojo Annan, son of former United Nations UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, Asika and Ibidapo.

    Laolu and Annan hold equal shares of 25,000 in Blue Diamond Holding Management Corp. The duo, along with Asika, also own Sutton Energy Limited, registered in the British Virgin Island.

    Mr. Asika owns 15,000 units of shares, the same amount owned by Laolu Saraki and Kojo Annan. Mr. Asika was a Senior Special Assistant to former President Goodluck Jonathan, and is closely connected to the Sutton Group

    Mr. Asika’s profile on the website of the Copyright Society of Nigeria (COSON), of which he is Board member, refers to him as Founding Partner & Executive Director, Sutton Group from June 1999 to October 2002.

    The connection between Mr. Annan and Mr. Asika seems clear, as Mr. Annan sits on the Board of Mr. Asika’s other company, Dragon Africa. Additional documents show that the trio – Laolu, Kojo and Asika – also co-own Sapphire Holding Ltd., a company located in Samoa, a tiny Island of an estimated 194,320 people in the South Pacific.

    Company documents also indicate that Ensol Limited (Environmental Solutions), registered in the Republic of Seychelles, with registration number 028376, partly belongs to Laolu Saraki

    The company is co-owned with Ama Annan, a relative of Kofi Annan (former UN Secretary General), who was appointed director on May 19, 2006 but ceased to be director on July 2, 2008.

    Another Nigerian, Ibidapo, was then appointed to replace her on January 4, 2010.

    ‘Ibori connected to four offshore firms’

    Former Delta State Governor James Ibori is also listed as one of a large number of public figures who have hidden offshore assets.

    The report on the former governor reads:

    “James Ibori, governor of Nigeria’s oil-rich Delta State from 1999 to 2007, pleaded guilty in a London court in 2012 to conspiracy to defraud and money laundering offenses.”

    “Ibori admitted using his position as governor to corruptly obtain and divert up to $75 million out of Nigeria through a network of offshore companies, although authorities alleged that the total amount he embezzled may have exceeded $250 million.”

    “Ibori, who received a 13-year prison sentence, used millions of dollars to support a lavish lifestyle that included six houses in London and a fleet of Range Rovers, Bentleys and Mercedes.”

    “Mossack Fonseca was the registered agent of four offshore companies connected to James Ibori, including Julex Foundation, of which Ibori and family members were beneficiaries.”

    “Julex was the shareholder of Stanhope Investments, a company incorporated in Niue in 2003. Ibori was also connected to Financial Advisory Group Ltd. and Hunglevest Corporation, although Mossack Fonseca’s files do not specify the exact nature of his connection.”

    “In 2008, Mossack Fonseca received a request from the Seychelles government to produce documents as part of a probe by the Crown Prosecution Service, England’s principal prosecuting authority, of Ibori and alleged criminal activities.”

    “In 2012, Ibori pleaded guilty in a London court to laundering and fraud charges. During court hearings in the United Kingdom, prosecutors claimed that Ibori opened a Swiss bank account in the name of Stanhope Investments through which millions of dollars were later channeled to ultimately buy a $20 million private jet.”

    The investigation was started after an anonymous source contacted German newspaper, Süddeutsche Zeitung. The newspaper shared the files with the ICIJ which released the first report on Sunday.

    Other world figures who have been named include Bollywood’s Amitabh Bachchan, martial arts movie star, Jackie Chan, football star,Lionel Messi and associates of Russian President, Vladmir Putin.

     

  • Stop Saraki’s trial, say CNPP, IPAC

    Stop Saraki’s trial, say CNPP, IPAC

    The Congress of Nigerian Political Parties (CNPP) and Inter Party Advisory Council (IPAC) in Kwara State have joined those demanding the stoppage of the trial of Senate President Bukola Saraki at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT).

    They said in statements that the trial was borne out of political vendetta and not a fight against corruption as its initiators wanted the public to believe.

    IPAC’s statement was signed by its Chairman and Secretary, Alhaji Adebayo Lawal and Dave Ifabiyi; while CNPP’s was signed by its Secretary, Prince Olufemi Adeleke.

    IPAC statement reads: “What is happening in the political arena, as far as the Senate presidency is concerned, is nothing short of tyrannical rule.

    “Any democratic dispensation that practises such is nothing short of dictatorship and nepotism.

    “This is an action that any Nigerian, who values the norms of democracy, will not adopt. We should not allow the ‘man’ to die in us.

    “In advanced democracies of the world where the bi-camera legislature is practised, members of the hallowed chambers reserve the right to elect whoever they want to lead them.”

    It urged the CCT to toe the line of sanity and fair play.

    “The Senate president should no longer be compelled to appear before the CCT since he has his team of erudite lawyers representing him.

    “The charges should be reviewed to eliminate areas of witch-hunt, vilification and persecution in view of the fact that the declaration was legally logged over 10 years ago.”

    The CNPP said: “We say no to the continued castigation and victimisation of the person of the Senate president on those trumped-up allegations.”

  • CCT trial : Saraki flies in experts from US, Israel, Scandinavian countries

    CCT trial : Saraki flies in experts from US, Israel, Scandinavian countries

    Senate President, Dr. Abubakar Bukola Saraki may have decided to engage the prosecution in the suit filed against him by the Federal Government over his asset declarations when he held sway as governor of Kwara State.

    To this end, the Senate President, sources said, has flown in a group of experts from the United States, Israel and one of the Scandinavian countries to provide ‘specialized services’ to his team of lawyers led by Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN.

    It was gathered that the experts are not lawyers, but are crack investigators, forensic and handwriting specialists whose role will be to help get more information on the witnesses and documents that have already been filed before the Tribunal by the prosecution.

    The experts, are believed to have arrived on Monday and immediately had a preliminary meeting with the Senate President’s team on Monday in Lagos. They are also to move to Abuja any moment from now.

    “The investigators will ferret out and scrutinize thoroughly all available information on the eight prosecution witnesses, including their school records, service records from their past and present places of employment and personal information that may help the defence team in the course of the trial. Most of those so-called witnesses will not be credible when information concerning their life is presented publicly before the Tribunal.

    “It is also expected that with the fear that the prosecution may present forged documents, our team needs to be vigilant and pro-active considering the manner in which the proceedings before the tribunal is being conducted. Our people believe that with the way properties that have nothing to do with Saraki are being put on the charge sheet, there are tendencies that documents to sustain their claims may have been forged. All these the experts will screen and help the lawyers with information that may help them,” the source said.

    The listed witnesses who are mostly from the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) are Michael Wetcas, Nura Ali Bako, Mustapha Abubakar Musa, Nwachukwu Amasu, Samuel Madojemin, Adamu Garba and Bayo Dauda ( a member of staff of Guaranty Trust Bank, GTB).

  • Northcentral leaders dismiss CCT’s judgment on Saraki

    Northcentral leaders dismiss CCT’s judgment on Saraki

    A Group, the Coalition of Leaders of Thought in the Northcentral zone yesterday rejected the March 24 judgment of the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) against Senate President Bukola Saraki.

    Addressing reporters in Ilorin, the Kwara State capital, spokesman for the group, Senator Ahmed Mohammed, called for the stoppage of Saraki’s trial at the CCT.

    He urged President Muhammadu Buhari not to be indifferent to the injustice and abuse of the legal system as “being allegedly perpetrated” by Justice Umar Danladi at the CCT.

    Senator Mohammed said the pronouncement by eminent jurists that the CCT lacked the power to prosecute Saraki was enough to prompt presidential action.

    He said: “On our part, we make bold to say that we will reject whatever is the outcome of this illegal and kangaroo trial under Umar Danladi, who was alleged to have criminal charges hanging on his neck, while the tribunal has been declared incompetent by legal luminaries.

    “We have refrained from speaking about the trial of Saraki at the CCT because of our belief that it is an issue that will stand the test of truth, equity and justice.

    “But it has become significant to raise our voice not only for posterity, but because of the pronouncement of Justice Danladi Umar, which established that double standard is reigning supreme.”

    Justifying their call for the President’s intervention, Mohammed noted that Saraki delivered Kwara State 100 per cent to the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the last general election and he was a pillar in the Northcentral.

    “If fair is fair, Saraki deserves to be the most commended politician in the APC,” he added.

    The coalition’s spokesman said: “In the six geo-political zones, APC used to have one governor in Nasarawa before Kwara joined. Today, APC rules in all states in the Northcentral, courtesy of the outstanding role Saraki played with others.

    “There is no other zone that came from one to six governors today. APC also has the highest number in the National Assembly, state legislatures and local governments.

    “Unfortunately, at this moment, Senator Saraki is being condemned, persecuted and vilified by the party he helped to build.

    “If we review his leadership at the Senate and chairmanship of the National Assembly in the last nine months, is there anyone who has not seen the high capacity demonstrated by Saraki in the conduct of business at the upper house and coordination of the National Assembly?

    “For the first time since 1999, the budget was passed the same day in both chambers with similar figures without any need for a joint committee to harmonise their differences. Harmonisation was done from the start.

    “With the Senate’s searchlight on the Treasury Single Account (TSA), Nigeria is saving over N600 million everyday. The war against Boko Haram is being won because the National Assembly approved the funds.”

     

    He brought succour to Nigerians through the cancellation of fixed charges by DISCO tariff and saved the nation from strike by Labour, among other laudable and progressive steps and decision taken in the best interest of our nation.”

  • Saraki loses bid to quash charges

    Saraki loses bid to quash charges

    Senate President Bukola Saraki has failed in his bid to quash the 13-count of false assets declaration, as the Code of Conduct Tribunal dismissed his application yesterday.

    Tribunal Chairman Danladi Umar dismissed Saraki’s application on the grounds that it lacked merit.

    He held that Saraki was wrong to have requested the tribunal to be guided by its decision in the Bola Tinubu case.

    Umar said the tribunal could not rely on its decision in the Tinubu case, having in subsequent cases departed from the position it took in the Tinubu case.

    The tribunal chairman upheld the argument of lead prosecution lawyer Rotimi Jacobs (SAN) that the CCT, in subsequent judgments, realised that its decision in FRN v. Bola Tinubu was given per incuriam (without due regard to the law or the facts) and had departed from it and followed the constitution’s provision.

    He held that Paragraph 3 (e) of Part 1 of the 3rd Schedule to the 1999 Constitution removed and omitted the proviso (in Section 3 (d) of the Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal (CCB/T) Act requiring written admission or denial.

    “That proviso that is repeated in Section 3 (d) of the CCB/T Act cannot be sustained any longer under the 1999 Constitution. The decision in Tinubu’s case was given per incuriam and the tribunal should not follow such a decision,” he said.

    Umar faulted Saraki’s claim that it was wrong for the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) to prosecute him about 15 years after he allegedly committed the offences of false assets declaration.

    The CCT chairman agreed with Jacobs that since there was no time limit within which an individual can submit a complaint of infraction or non-compliance with the Code of Conduct, the defendant’s argument that once there was no official complaint against him within a reasonable time of his submitting the declaration he could no longer be investigated and prosecuted, could not stand.

    He noted that there could be no clearance by implication, unless it was expressly stated by the statutes, adding that “time does not run against the state”.

    “It is not out of place to charge the accused person now and ask him to answer to the charges against as there is no statute of limitation in relation to his case,” Umar said.

    The CCT chairman rejected Saraki’s contention that the attorney general of the federation (AGF) was without powers to initiate and prosecute cases before the tribunal.

    He held that the AGF, empowered by the Constitution to intimate or take over initiated criminal cases on behalf of the Federal Government, could initiate and prosecute cases before the tribunal.

    The tribunal chairman noted that the defendant’s claim that he was denied fair hearing having not been called to make a written statement before the filing of the charge, could be raised later in the case.

    He held that such argument was premature and could be raised in the course of hearing.

    “The motion by the defendant to quash the charge against him is refused. In the final analyses, the tribunal assumes jurisdiction in this case. The prosecution is to invite its witness,” he said.

    After the ruling, and upon enquiry by the CCT chairman about the next step, Jacobs urged the tribunal to allow the prosecution to open its case.

    “We are ready for trial, my lord. And our witnesses are ready and are in court. Let us open our case by calling our first witness, even if it is for five minutes,” Jacobs said.

    Lead defence witness Kanu Agabi (SAN) objected to the commencement of trial. He said the case was adjourned to yesterday for ruling.

    Agabi said the tribunal would create the impression that it had made up its mind, before the ruling, to proceed with trial, even when the defence was challenging its jurisdiction.

    He sought a fresh date for the commencement of trial.

    Tribunal chairman agreed with Agabi that it was unnecessary for the tribunal to rush into trial. He noted that the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), though seeks prompt determination of criminal cases, recognises the need for the defendant to be given adequate time to prepare its defence.

    “We do not need to rush. We need to proceed carefully in the interest of justice and to ensure that justice is done to all parties. The ACJA did not say the defendants should not be given adequate time to prepare its defence,” he said.

    He adjourned to April 5 for the prosecution to open its case.

  • CCT refuses to quash charges against Saraki

    The Code of Conduct Tribunal, CCT has refused Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki’s application to quash the 13-count criminal charge the Federal Government leveled against him.

    The panel led by Justice Danladi Umar, in a ruling on Thursday held that the charge leveled against him was valid and competent in law, stressing that both the law that established it and the 1999 constitution, as amended, conferred on it the requisite jurisdiction to hear and determine the case against the defendant.

    The tribunal, relying on the decided case-law in FRN vs Atiku Abubakar, 2007, 8-NWLR, noted that it was vested with the powers to handle allegations bordering on breach of code of conduct by public officers.

    Justice Umar, however, admitted that the CCT took an erroneous decision in a similar case that involved the former governor of Lagos State and national leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Ahmed Bola Tinubu.

    He said: “The tribunal has since realised that the decision it made on the case between FRN vs Tinubu was in error and has clearly departed from it”.

  • Trial at CCT: Saraki seeks delivery of withheld judgment

    Trial at CCT: Saraki seeks delivery of withheld judgment

    Senate President Bukola Saraki has demanded that Justice Abdul Kafarati of the Federal High Court, Abuja be allowed to deliver judgment in his fundamental rights enforcement suit.

    The judge had, on Tuesday, withheld his judgment in the case and announced his withdrawal on the ground that reports by some on-line media, Sahara Reporters and Naij.com, alleged that he had been bribed by the Senate President.

    Saraki, in a protest letter dated March 22, by his lawyer, Prince Ajibola Oluyede, to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, noted that although he sympathises with the judge, the interest of justice would only be served if the judgment was delivered.

    Oluyede, while speaking with journalists yesterday, after the submission of the letter to the chief judge, Federal High Court, accused the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) of being behind the publications, which, he said, were intended to intimidate the judge.

    “It is our argument in the suit that the Code of Conduct Tribunal cannot act independently the way it is currently constituted because we believe Its Chairman, Danladi Umar, who is currently under investigation by the EFCC, cannot be independent in deciding a case being prosecuted before him by the EFCC.

    “We have also contended that the EFCC, by admitting that the investigation of the case against our client was done by a special task force, as against the requirement by the provision in Schedule 3 of the Constitution, has usurped the exclusive duties of the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB). It is on that basis we argued that our client cannot get justice under the current arrangement and asked the court to quash the charge,” Oluyede said.

    Part of the letter also reads: “Although one cannot but sympathise with the hard-working judges, who are victims of these vicious attacks. Nevertheless, we find ourselves in disagreement with his (Justice Kafarati) that the interest of justice would be served by his withholding of his judgment and returning the matter to your Lordship for reassignment.

    “In our view, the abdication by Justice Kafarati no only fails to meet the end of justice, it also gives momentum to the growth of blackmail tactics and dishonourable conduct targeted at obstructing the administration of justice.

  • Senate, House to begin debate on PIB next week, says Saraki

    Senate, House to begin debate on PIB next week, says Saraki

    The Senate and the House of Representatives will commence debate on the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) by laying it in their respective chambers next week as a demonstration of the synergy existing between both chambers of the National Assembly.

    Senate President, Dr.  Bukola Saraki stated this in Abuja at a Business Environment Roundtable on the economy hosted by the National Assembly.

    He said this has become necessary to gain speed in the consideration and passage of the PIB and to prevent wasting of time, energy and scarce resources that was prevalent in the past.

    Saraki said: “We have said that the present National Assembly would not be business as usual. More importantly is the presence of the Honourable Speaker represented by the Chief Whip of the House at this event. The message from this is that the National Assembly – both Senate and House of Representatives, is working very closely together in the 8th National Assembly and as such, some of these processes would not be bogged down in any of the chambers.

    “We are both committed; we have both come out with our agenda and as part of this commitment, you will all see next week, when we lay the PIB. You will see that the Bill we are going to lay in the House is the same Bill we are going to lay in the Senate because for the first time, we are committed to work together as one to achieve results,” he said.

    On the purpose of the roundtable, he said: “Our dear President Muhammadu Buhari has laid down for us the vision for a diversified economy away from too much dependence on volatile oil, to ensure  security of our people’s lives, block revenue leakages, create employment for our people, expand our people’s economic opportunities and close the gap on our infrastructure deficit.

    “The National Assembly has in tandem made these the vision, the anchor-point of its legislative agenda but we know that being a mere agenda is not enough, that no mantra or talk can make this happen without commensurate purposeful action.”

    He lamented that the nation’s business environment is running largely on obsolete laws, weak governance framework and fragmented regulatory structures bogged down by inhibiting practices with very weak accountability mechanisms.

    He said the research that led to the business environment report was necessitated by the desire to create a new architecture for businesses to thrive in the country.

    He said the special business environment roundtable was meant to “interrogate the report, validate its conclusions, get the buy-in of key stakeholders including the organised private sector, key government agencies, policy makers, regulators, the media, civil society and other stakeholders.

    “We have gone this route because we believe that if we deliberately involve and continuously engage our people in lawmaking, the edicts and policies we make will be greatly enriched and accepted having been a product of collective consensus.”