Tag: scandal

  • ‘How to pull economy out of recession’ 

    ‘How to pull economy out of recession’ 

    Members of the All Progressive Congress (APC) in Brazil has suggested that the only alternative and relief for Nigeria economic recession and over dependence in oil is to emulate the success story of Brazil by embarking on Agribusiness venture.

    The APC Chairman, Brazil, Chief Chukwudi Kenneth Modilim  in his opening remarks during an Agribusiness Summit powered by the party in Brazil, in collaboration with Brazil Nigeria Business Consortium (BNBC) said the present economic recession has a new horizon of solution.

    The  Business summit which took place  in one of  the largest commercial city of Brazil São Paulo, attracted cream of Nigerian professionals, students, industrialists and their Brazilian counterparts.

    Chief Modilim, a prominent businessman, called on President Muhammadu Buhari’s economic team to appropriate the advanced solutions and researches of the Brazilian Agribusiness policy makers, and Agro agencies to its agribusiness men and women.

    He said: “I want to inform you that these solutions assisted in cushioning the Brazilian’s economy from the hazardous effects of 2009-2013 world economic crises. And it has consequently salvaged the Brazilian economy from total collapse during its 2014-2016 political instability which resulted from their petroleum parastatal,( PETROBRAS, scandal)”.

    The President, Brazil Nigeria Business Consortium (BNBC) Mr. Innocent Ebere Ukanyirioha, said BNBC collaborated with this event and other events hosted by eminent Nigerians in Brazil, because of how much important they attach to Nigeria economic development

    He said irrespective of individual, political inclination, political party affiliation and diversity of Nigerians living in Brazil, yet they came together to contribute and participate, adding that the project Nigeria is bigger than any political or sectional interest.

    “We solicit the collaborative assistance of the present administration and the private sector, towards beaming their searchlight In the agribusiness direction of this part of the globe. And with the framework and expertise of the APC, and BNBC we believe, a take-off ground is already in motion.”

    The Spokesman of APC, Brazil Chapter, Hon. Ike Barry Egbujie, who enumerated the extensive impact of agribusiness on the Brazilian economy, said Nigerian will come out strong from the recession if the Nigeria leaders can emulate from the story of others.

    He pointed out the statistical revenue generated by agro products compared to oil, in Brazil, which is an index that an economy can successfully thrive on agribusiness, which  he said has generated over 60 percent of Brazil export earnings.

    Those in attendance include renowned experts in Agribusiness policy makers, Brazilian agribusiness agencies, the Consul General of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in São Paulo- His Excellency Muntari Abdu Kaita, the Namibian Consul General in Sao Paulo, His Excellency Thomas Bloch,

    Other dignitaries in attendance were, Chief Lawrence O. Balogun, Vice Chairman APC Brazil, the Secretary-General of APC Brazil, Alhaji Farouk Sadiq,  the APC Brazil Women leader, Barrister Princess Ogechi Nwosu, Elder Lucius Udemezue, Chief Solomon, Pastor Chukwuemeka Ujor amongst others.

     

  • Activists: interrogate Jonathan for $2.1b arms scandal

    Activists: interrogate Jonathan for $2.1b arms scandal

    Human rights activists have urged the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) to invite former President Goodluck Jonathan to explain his role in the $2.1 billion arms fund allegedly misappropriated by the former National Security Adviser (NSA) Col. Sambo Dasuki.

    Committee for the Defence of Human Rights (CDHR) chief, Mr Malachy Ugwummadu and Civil Society Network Against Corruption Comrade Lanre Suraj agreed that Jonathan’s statement that Dasuki couldn’t have stolen $2.1 billion, provided the anti-graft agency the caveat to interrogate the ex-President.

    They spoke on a Television Continental (TVC) programme monitored in Lagos.

    Ugwummadu said EFCC should take advantage of the statement to interrogate Jonathan.

    According to him, the ex-President had dragged himself into the fray of investigation.

    The human rights activist said Jonathan should prove or deny the evidence given by ex-Minister of State for Defence Senator Musiliu Obanikoro that he collected several millions of naira from Dasuki, which he delivered to Governor Ayo Fayose to prosecute his governorship campaign.

    He said the EFCC should invite Jonathan to react to the evidence of the ex-National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Chief Olisa Metuh, that he (Jonathan) approved the N400 million paid into his private company’s  account in respect of services provided for the former President during the electioneering campaign.

    The rights activist noted that shortly before leaving office last year, Jonathan said his aides should be prepared for persecution under the Buhari administration.

    “But some of his lieutenants suspected to have taken part in the looting have returned their share. With his statement defending Dasuki, Jonathan has started the process to undermine the anti-graft war of the Buhari administration,” Ugwummadu added.

    Suraj urged Jonathan to  controvert the statement credited to the Social Democratic Party (SDP) National leader Chief Olu Falae that the former President approved N100 million into his account for his party to work for him in last year’s presidential election.

  • NBA and judicial corruption scandal

    NBA and judicial corruption scandal

    SIR: The profession of the law has been taken into that very difficult grey zone of reconciling conflicting interests and loyalties. It seems to me that some leaders of the Bar, for reasons best known to each individual, have tilted towards personal loyalty to their closed professional class rather than towards loyalty and deference to greater, true national interests.

    Even more worrying is the attempt to justify this leaning by consciously mudding the clear waters of the law governing this very sad and disturbing occurrence: the government have been mischievously made to appear to have lawlessly violated the fundamental doctrines of the Rule of Law and constitutional Separation of Powers. The reality, however, is that it is, in fact, the government who is upholding these hallowed doctrines by insisting, respectively, that judges are as equal before the law as the humblest citizen in the realm, and that it is the exclusive constitutional power and duty of the executive – through its security agencies –  to detect and investigate crime, as well as arrest and prosecute a suspected criminal, and not, surreptitiously,  the  judiciary’s, through the National Judicial Council, whose role is constitutionally limited to the appointment, promotion, and discipline of members of the judiciary (in a way that is not too dissimilar to the average civil service commission).

    The ill-conceived argument of some leaders of the NBA, if accepted, would violate the tenets of both constitutional doctrines and produce the incongruity of judges investigating and deciding whether crimes alleged to have been committed by their brother judges should be prosecuted.

    The contrived indignation and obfuscation of settled law by some senior lawyers may suggest to many that the African personality and psyche is inherently deeply flawed. It may give the impression that elementary notions of justice, honour and fair play are indeed alien to the African psychology and culture. Regrettably, cynical interventions in national affairs by senior lawyers are neither new nor isolated: an earlier generation of lawyers advised Balewa in 1962 that he had the power to declare a state of emergency in the Western Region when clearly the circumstances for so doing did not exist as envisaged by the constitution. This single action destabilised the West, and eventually led to a military take-over and Civil War. Nigeria was never the same again.

    The effect of the hasty and ill-judged interjection  of the NBA in this matter can only be to further erode the declining public confidence and trust in the integrity and judgement of members of the profession of the law.

     

    • Akin A. Ajose-Adeogun,

     Lagos.

  • Bullying scandal rocks elite Lagos school as victim suffers dual fractures

    Bullying scandal rocks elite Lagos school as victim suffers dual fractures

    Parents accuse high school authorities of shielding mystery
    perpetrator in elaborate cover-up School expresses
    disappointment, dismiss allegations as ‘very wrong’

    The school was silent when Ebunoluwa Adegboyega became the bullies’ favourite. At age 10, her bruises were legion. Her mind was a mist of scars. But nobody could see her wince. Through her ordeal, a battle ravaged in Ebunoluwa’s head; harsh words lunged like savages to scathe her fragile mien. The bullies called her “Orobo,” and that was almost too farfetched, as Ebunoluwa didn’t exactly cut the picture of obesity – at least by her parents’ standards.

    While the bullies taunted her over size, Ebunoluwa lived the blithe life of a castle princess in her parent’s homestead. Nonetheless, the 10-year-old student of Junior Secondary School One (J.S.S.1) class, Grace Schools, Gbagada, Lagos, stirred every morning with a violent tremor in her heart. As she dressed up for school, she girded up like a medieval warrior, to brave the taunts and insolent jeers of peer that deemed it fit to pick on her.

    From whispered slurs and spoken taunts about her size, which often elicited the derisive remark, ‘Orobo,’ to the occasional blow on the head from the palm and book of “Uchenna,” one of her alleged assailants, Ebunoluwa suffered interminable hurt and sorrow in pursuit of a high school education.

    Her experience at Grace Schools was hardly what she and her parents expected at her resumption in the educational facility. But it was easier not to ask too many questions or raise a ruckus about Ebunoluwa’s plight. Although her mother, Dr. Bande Adegboyega, a gynecologist, wished to raise hell, her father, Dr. Temitope Adegboyega, a pediatrician, believed in letting the hostilities thaw out. “Children will always play,” he said,

    But that childish ‘play’ would degenerate into a vicious encounter. Ebunoluwa, unfortunately, could neither avoid nor ride the tide of the playful viciousness. A trip to the school canteen would cost the 10-year-old and her parents very much. On April 15, 2016, during lunch break, somebody shoved Ebunoluwa violently from the back while she stood outside the school canteen. She fell face down; the impact of her fall crushed both her legs and bruised her skin. Consequently, Ebunoluwa suffered fractures on both legs.

     

    Ebunoluwa’s story: ‘They did not try to find out who pushed me’

    “On that day, I went to the dining hall to eat during lunch break in my school. When I came out of the canteen, I came out with three people in my class. Their names are Jumaima, Grace and Sophia. I talked to them a little. Then they started moving on their own. They were going. When I now wanted to take my own step, someone came from the back and pushed me. I didn’t see the person that pushed me. My three classmates didn’t see the person that pushed me. We were all backing the person.

    “I fell on my face. Then I started calling for help. One boy, a J.S.S 2 student, came to carry me to the clinic. In the clinic, the nurse put Savlon (an antiseptic) and bandage on my left leg. I was bleeding from that leg and a wound on my right leg. I was crying because it was very painful.

    “Then she said she would fix my bone back but I had a fracture and she could not fix my bone back. Then she put bandage on my leg. I could not leave the clinic on my own. I could not walk on my legs,” said Ebunoluwa.

     

    What happened to her was an act of wickedness – Victim’s mom

    Shedding light on the intrigues, Ebunoluwa’s mom, Dr. Bande Adegboyega, a gynaecologist, said: “On April 15, I was called. I had a phone call from the school nurse that I should come to the school that my daughter could not walk. While I was in the school, the driver brought Ebunoluwa with the nurse. I saw her in the car. She was crying. She was in serious pains. I looked at her legs and I noticed that they had bandaged one leg, that was the leg that was fractured, and the other leg was plastered.

    “I was angry. I said they should bring her out immediately. At this point, the Principal, Mr. Ronald Cilliers, a South African, came and I challenged him: ‘I thought you had CCTV camera that covers the school?’ What surprised me however, was that the principal was too much on the defensive, trying to cover up for the school…We told the principal that what happened to her must be an act of wickedness and that we would like to see the person responsible for her accident. Instantly, he became very defensive. He said I shouldn’t say it was an act of wickedness. I didn’t see empathy in him so I just ignored him,” she said.

    According to the victim’s mom, Ebunoluwa was not running when she was pushed, she was not standing on a ledge or some other elevated outthrust from the ground or platform. “She was on level ground. I saw the spot,” said Dr. Adegboyega.

    There is no gainsaying Dr. Adegboyega met her daughter in a state of agonising pain. Her left leg was very swollen from the knee down to the feet. Also, the right leg which had a deep cut and had bled a lot, was plastered, while the fractured leg was bandaged. She was informed that Ebunoluwa had been administered Paracetamol. The gynaecologist, thus on her own, unaccompanied by any member of the school, rushed her daughter to the Orthopaedic Hospital, Igbobi, Lagos. She was later transferred to the Orthopaedic clinic, Gbagada General Hospital, Gbagada.

     

    Echoes of indifference and undetected fracture

    Dr. Adegboyega expresssed her disappointment at the school’s reaction to her daughter’s plight. “I was surprised that none of them called me from the school afterwards, to ask me what happened or enquire about my daughter’s health. This made me very angry. At the hospital, we did x-ray and confirmed that she suffered fracture on her left leg. But because she was able to stand on the other leg, we didn’t know that there was something wrong with her right leg. But soon we noticed blisters on her right leg. We consulted one of the consultants at the Orthopaedic Hospital, Igbobi and the consultant emphasised that the blisters were telltale signs that there was something wrong with Ebunoluwa’s right leg. The consultant surgeon confirmed that they were fracture blisters and that we shouldn’t have allowed her to stand on that leg.

    “So they put Plaster of Paris (POP) on her left leg and ordered an x-ray of her right leg. The x-ray revealed that Ebunoluwa had also suffered fracture on her right leg. The consultant recommended that we confined her to a wheel chair pending the time that her fractures would heal.

    “We took her home and still nobody called us from the school. I now got angry and invited a lawyer. We called the Principal but he persistently ignored our calls again. The father subsequently called the Vice Principal to complain about the school’s nonchalance to our child’s plight,” she said.

    Corroborating her, Dr. Temitope Adegboyega, Ebunoluwa’s father, stated that the Vice Principal later came to meet them in Igbobi with the school’s chaplain. “He said we should give Ebunoluwa adequate medical treatment. He said we should not mind the Principal. He said we should give her all the treatment that she needed claiming the school would foot the bill.”

     

    Seeking recompense

    Afterwards the parents, accompanied by their attorney, and a close relative, allegedly held a meeting with the Vice- Principal of the School on April 19 and April 26, 2016 respectively. At the meeting, the Vice Principal reportedly assured them that the management of the school was ready to bear the costs of treatment of the injury and to also take on the responsibility of transportation of Ebunoluwa, to and from the school premises every day.

    Efforts made by their lawyer to see the Principal, both in his office and on phone, and get his commitment on the above however proved abortive as he bluntly refused to give any audience, disclosed Dr. Adegboyega. The family thus, represented by their lawyer, also made demands in the letter dated April 18, 2016 as follows: that the full cost implication of treatment, nursing care and consequent management of the victim will be borne by the school management. They also demanded that the result of the investigation carried out by the school should be sent to the office of the family’s lawyer within one week of the completion and penalties imposed on the perpetrator. They demanded that Ebunoluwa’s safety be guaranteed and security measures in the school strengthened.

     

    A history of bullying

    Before Ebunoluwa’s accident, there had been previous incidents. According to her mom, “She had been bullied. She said one boy (Uchenna) used to hit her on the head. I told the father but he dismissed it, stating that it’s one of the pranks children indulge in among themselves. Even Ebunoluwa’s teacher, Mr. Balogun, said she was one of the most gentle students in the class. She was no troublemaker. She was a victim of bullying. She was persistently picked on by her mates because of her size. They called her ‘Orobo.’ The Vice Principal said we should have reported the situation a long while ago.”

     

    Discordant tunes

    The VP, Balogun subsequently provided a driver to convey Ebunoluwa to and from school every day, until the school went on midterm break. To our surprise, the following Monday, which was the school’s resumption day, we waited till 9 am and the driver that used to come for Ebunoluwa did not show up. I went to the school to see the VP but he told me off. He said my daughter should not resume in school as she was a debtor. He said my daughter was a debtor and the rule is that she must not come in. He said they only allowed her into the school that day on compassionate grounds. I was angry. I reminded him that the school did not foot the bill of my child’s medical treatment as he promised and that they abandoned us and forced us to handle the medical bills which was over N500, 000.

    “But he told me to go and pay the school fees. He said we can go ahead and do whatever we liked. He said the school has competent Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SANs) that can prolong the case. He said what can we do with our small lawyer? He said he had been personally responsible for providing transportation for my daughter to and from school all along. He said the school was never ready to assist.

    “So we paid her school fees and she resumed on another day. But since the driver the VP provided had stopped coming, her father started taking her to and from school every day,” she said.

     

    ‘Leave everything to God’

    Further findings suggested shady manoeuvrings after the incident. The VP reportedly instructed Ebunoluwa’s classmates to write statements about her accident, according to Dr. Adegboyega. According to her, a teacher within the school revealed to her that the next day after the incident, the VP instructed some of Ebunoluwa’s classmates to write statements indicating that nobody pushed her when she fell. He allegedly ordered them to write that Ebunoluwa was running when she fell.

    “He allegedly did all that without our knowledge even though he later came to the hospital to beg us not to take legal action against the school. The teacher begged me to keep quiet and leave everything to God. I was mortified. I wondered how the Vice Principal could make minors commit such act,” she said.

     

    ‘Duty of care

    Yemisi Adepoju, the victim’s lawyer, argued that, “Once a student resumes in school, the school owes the student duty of care from the moment he or she steps into its premises till closing hours when he or she departs the school for home. That was what the school (Grace Schools) had sold. The school claimed to install CCTV cameras as a security measure and the school also makes students sign anti-bullying statements.”

    Indeed, the duty of care means schools must do everything reasonably possible to protect their students from foreseeable harm, injury, and death. This duty includes providing a safe environment for students, according to Sulaiman Tella, a lawyer.

    According to him, when a school fails to protect its students from foreseeable harm, the law says it acted negligently. A school’s negligence makes it responsible, or liable, for the injured student’s damages.

     

    The legal doctrine of in loco parentis

    In loco parentis (a Latin term meaning “in place of the parent”) is a legal doctrine that applies to school administrators and teachers. The doctrine means that while a child is at school or away on a school-sponsored, extracurricular activity, the teacher has the responsibility and duties of the student’s parents. While in loco parentis gives teachers latitude in supervising students and student activities, the legal doctrine makes teachers and administrators liable for accidents and injuries students sustain while under their supervision.

    If a child has an accident in the school, in the schoolyard, on the way to school, on the school bus or while on a school trip, the question of whether or not the school or the teachers were negligent may arise. Everything however, depends on the facts of the individual case, argued Tella.

     

    The grim picture

    Ebunoluwa’s case represents a microcosm of the violence malaise afflicting Nigerian secondary schools. Some victims however, do not live to tell their story. For instance, Iyanuoluwa Dahunsi, a 15-year-old SSS 2 pupil of Bishop Philip Academy, Ibadan, Oyo State, was hospitalised after she was reportedly slapped by Funke Fashina, who was then the secretary to the school’s Principal, on January 29, 2015.

    Dahunsi subsequently developed a lingering eye problem, causing her partial blindness. Although Fashina was later arrested and charged to court for the assault, Dahunsi, never recovered from it. Barely six months later, and five days after her 15th birthday, Dahunsi died on July 22, 2015 at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH). The late teenager was buried in February this year.

    And few people would forget in a hurry the heartrending saga of American elementary school girl, Ava Lynn. Photos of the bruised girl went viral on social media back in 2014 after she was reportedly attacked by a bully on the playground. According to the young girl’s mum, Lacey Harris, on Tuesday, August 26, 2014, she was called to come pick up her daughter at Arlington Elementary School in Pascagoula, Mississippi, because AvaLynn had been injured in an accident. The sight Lacey met when she got to Ava’s school was every parents’ nightmare: her daughter’s face was swollen, cut, and bruised beyond recognition.

    Ava informed her mum, Lacey, that she was assaulted by another student; that she was kicked repeatedly in the face until she fell off of the slide on the school’s playground. But the school informed Lacey that there were no teachers present when the incident occurred, and because of that, no one could prove whether or not another student had harmed Ava. That there had been an accident, no other students were involved, Ava got injured, they gave her medical treatment and that was as much as they could do.

    While the American constitution amply provides for and implements provisions for the protection of the American child, both at home and in school, Nigeria still fights a losing battle to replicate such feat within its social and legal framework. Nonetheless, the Child Rights Act clearly outlaws battery and physical abuse in any form, according to Betty Abah, the Executive Director, Centre for Children’s Health Education, Orientation and Protection.

    Approximately six out of every 10 children in Nigeria experience some form of violence before the age of 18, while half of all children experience physical violence, according to a finding from a 2014 national survey on “Violence Against Children in Nigeria.” Hence eminent scholar of United States’ University of Georgia, Moradeke Aderibigbe Abimbola,  suggested a more proactive and effective anti-bullying law for the country. She said the law should be operationalised to enhance Nigerian schools’ capacity to promptly investigate bullying cases in a timely manner and determine whether bullying has indeed occurred. She suggested a procedure for a teacher or other school employee, student, parent, guardian, or other person who has control or charge of a student, either anonymously or in such person’s name, at such person’s option, to report or otherwise provide information on bullying activity.

    Oftentimes children who are repeatedly bullied and assaulted in school start to wonder if they deserved. The teacher and other administrative staff can counteract this by sitting with the child at lunch to offer counselling. “They may visit the child at home to show support and offer emotional counsel. Any expression of support is good,” argued Olayinka Otun, a child psychologist.

    However, when bullying takes on a more dangerous facade, as it frequently does in high school, bystanders should be encouraged to intervene by speaking up in support of a bullied classmate. For relational aggression – name calling and gossiping – the school authority and bystanders should always take a stand, argued Rachel Oyibo, an educational psychologist and school counsellor.

    “The best form of intervention is teaching kids and enlightening staff to always speak up and stand in defense of the abused particularly in established cases of bullying,” she said.

     

    We will make sure that the press is closed down —Grace Schools’ Vice Principal, Balogun

    At exactly 1:52 pm on Wednesday, July 13, 2016, The Nation reporter arrived at the school to see the Vice Principal, P.A. Balogun. About five minutes after his secretary informed him of the reporter’s presence, a very hesitant Balogun received the reporter in his office. He demanded to know The Nation’s mission in the school. No sooner was he briefed than he began to issue warnings to the reporter. He threatened that the school would “close down” any newspaper that published anything against the school.

    He said: “The lawyers are already handling the case. We received a letter from their (Adegboyegas) own lawyer, and our lawyers have responded. I cannot confirm to you whether the matter is in court now or not.”

    When our reporter told the Vice Principal that the lawyer to the Adegboyegas had not filed any suit in court as the aggrieved party, Balogun responded: “I don’t know, but the matter must have been in court.”

    The Vice Principal condemned the allegations raised by the aggrieved family. He said: “All the allegations are wrong. The letter the family wrote to the school was very wrong. That is why the owner of the school said we should not entertain anything on the matter again.”

     

    Playing legal roulette in Grace Schools’ administrative offices

    “If anything is published, we will sue that publishing house for libel,” the VP threatened. Balogun dismissed claims that the school victimised Ebunoluwa. “How is the school victimising the child? Try and ask the family how their child is being victimised. Is it verbally, physical assault, beating? Just how? The parents of the child are medical doctors. If medical doctors are talking like that, what do you expect of a layman on the street? I am highly disappointed in them. Come, let me take you (reporter) to the Principal,” he said.

    En route the Principal’s office, VP Balogun engaged the reporter in the following discussion:

    Balogun: The school has two SANs (Senior Advocates of Nigeria) that are on the board here. We have notified them. They will take it over as well if any paper makes any malicious publication!

    Reporter: We are not making any malicious publication. That is why we are here to get your own side of the story.

    Balogun: In fact, we will make sure that the press is closed down! Honestly!

    At the Principal’s office, Balogun asked the reporter to stay with the secretary while he went inside to discuss with the Principal. Three minutes later, he placed a call to the ‘owner of the school,’ to inform her of the reporter’s presence.

    He said: “I have somebody here that said he is from The Nation newspaper. And he said that the family of Adegboyega made some allegations and that he has come to verify those allegations. I said they can only see our lawyers. I told him that we can’t give him any information here, that it is only our lawyer that he can talk to. I told him that if they publish anything, we will contact the SAN (Senior Advocate of Nigeria) straightaway. They shouldn’t publish anything. I told them that our lawyer is seeing their lawyer. I told him that they cannot get any information from the school. He is here now. I told the Principal and the Principal said I should report to you.

    I just want him to go…I will tell him that we are not ready to give any information here.”

    After making the call, he told the reporter: “I just talked to the owner of the school. She said you have no right to publish anything. And you cannot get any information for now. If there is any need for us to give you information, you can contact our lawyer. We can give you the contact,” he said.

    Promptly, the reporter requested for the contact of the school’s lawyer but the Vice Principal refused to give him the lawyer’s contact. He assumed a hostile posture and ordered the reporter out of the school.

    “Please, you may take your leave! If there is any need to contact our lawyers later, we can book an appointment with you,” he said.

    Thus at exactly 2:15 pm, the reporter took his leave with Balogun marching briskly beside him to ensure that he (reporter) did not stop by to speak to any student or member of staff.

    As he marched the reporter to the gate, the following conversation ensued:

    Reporter: “The parents also alleged that the school management forced her (the victim’s) colleagues to write false statement on how the incident happened. They claimed you coached her colleagues to write that she was running when she fell and that nobody pushed her.”

    Balogun: “Which of her colleagues?”

    Reporter: The victim’s colleagues who were present at the time of the accident.

    Balogun: (Silence)

    Reporter: “So when can we book the appointment with your lawyer?”

    Balogun: “Don’t worry, we will contact our lawyer. When we do so, whatever the lawyer says, we will let you know.”

    Reporter: “We don’t have time, because the story will go to press soon and we need to get the school’s account.”

    Balogun: “You just don’t rush to the press. It is not done anywhere.”

    Reporter: “I was here yesterday (Tuesday) but I was told you had left the premises before I got here.”

    Balogun: “Please, forward a letter to us to book an appointment with our lawyer.

    Reporter: This is the press sir. We don’t need you to contact your lawyer on our behalf. We can always do that. We will save time if you can put a call to your lawyer now.”

    Balogun: “The owner of the school has contacted the lawyer. And I have told you, our lawyers are speaking to their lawyer. Nobody should publish anything.”

    As the reporter drove out of the premises, Balogun was seen discussing with the school security personnel, pointing to the reporter’s car.

  • Chambers of scandal

    Chambers of scandal

    •Nothing short of a thorough probe will do into the charges against Dogara and Jibrin

    Last month, The 8th National Assembly celebrated its first anniversary with a sundry list of bills it had passed — of which the 2016 Budget was perhaps the most significant – the bills it was processing, the motions it had approved, and with a declaration of commitment to serving the public interest.

    The speechifying and the self-adulation took place, however, under a dark cloud.

    The President of the Senate, Dr Bukola Saraki, has been standing trial before the Code of Conduct Tribunal on a charge of perjury and has sought every opportunity to turn it into a circus, without vacating his exalted chair, and without the Senate requesting him to do so in keeping with the best practices.

    As if that is not stain enough on the honour of the National Assembly, Dr Saraki and the Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, have been arraigned before another court along with other officials, charged with forgery.

    Again, instead of asking these officials to step aside while the trials last, Senate has desperately sought ways to squelch the process, including attempting to bully the Attorney-General of the Federation into discontinuing prosecution, and threatening to suspend those of its members who filed the legitimate complaint on which the indictments are grounded.

    The cloud over the National Assembly has now darkened with recent disclosures that officials of its second chamber, the House of Representatives, padded the national budget with spending measures designed not to advance the public interest but to enrich and empower themselves.

    Using underhanded methods, they insinuated into the budget an additional N480 billion in spending, at a time the national economy is reeling from the collapse of the oil market and  lurching into a recession.

    They arrive at this subversive consensus through a process reminiscent of a bazaar. Each member so minded conjures up a “constituency project”, and ensures funding for it under some omnibus head. But that is the only part of the process that may qualify for a low pass in transparency.

    From then on, it is usually a descent into brazen abuse of office and platform. The member chooses the project and produces a contractor — a front, and not infrequently a close relation – to execute it. The contractor collects the earmarked amount from the agency into whose budget the project has been insinuated, and delivers it to the sponsor back in the House.

    Rarely are the projects executed as specified, and more rarely still is anyone held to account. There is no mechanism to ensure compliance. The lawmaker is the originator and executor of the project as well as certifying authority.

    This practice, it is necessary to state, did not begin with the 8th National Assembly. But, as the former Chair of the House Committee on Appropriations, Abdulmumin Jibrin has alleged, the present assembly has been following it in ways more brazen and ravenous.

    Of the N480 billion smuggled into the budget, N40 billion was apparently set aside for just one official of the House of Representatives, to be dispensed on dubious projects in his domain, Jibrin   said. This is one more indication of just how rife the system is with self-aggrandizement, if not outright corruption.

    Fighting back, senior officials of the House claim that Jibrin, who has since been sacked as chairman of the appropriations committee of the house, was responsible for the padding. Jibrin has released some documents that apparently back his case, with a promise to release more. As the drama unfolded, security officials moved in and sealed off the secretariat of the committee on appropriations, apparently to secure documents and computer records that will be required in an investigation.

    Nothing short of a full investigation into this tawdry business will do. The inquiry will have to go back to the time the practice started. Those who are found to have abused the public trust to enrich themselves should enjoy no parliamentary immunity for what is, at bottom, criminal behaviour.

    It is time to return the National Assembly from the house of scandal it has become to the house of law it was meant to be.

  • Reps step up dirty fight over Budget 2016 scandal

    Reps step up dirty fight over Budget 2016 scandal

    ‘Members’ revolt forced Jibrin’s sack’

    Lawmaker indicts House leadership

    House Speaker Yakubu Dogara dropped former Appropriation Committee chair  Abdulmumin Jibrin following pressure from members, it was learnt at the weekend.

    Members asked Dogara to choose between them and Jibrin in the aftermath of the padding of the 2016 budget, The Nation gathered.

    The Speaker sensationally removed Jibrin last week but the lawmaker lashed out at Dogara and three other principal officers, saying they should resign because, according to him, they prevailed on him to pad the budget in their favour, but he refused to.

    It was also learnt that members were angry that they were all sidelined by Jibrin and his counterpart in the Senate, Sen. Danjuma Goje.

    There were strong indications last night  that the House may suspend Jibrin when it resumes in September.

    According to a principal officer, who pleaded not to be named because he is not permitted to talk to the media, most members of the House were disappointed over the padding of the budget.

    The source said: “You can ask any member of the House, the padding of the budget created an image crisis for the National Assembly, especially the House.

    “Members were angry and, at a point, they asked Dogara to choose between them and Jibrin. The Speaker’s hands were tied but he was, however, tactical in not removing Jibrin immediately after the Appropriation Bill was passed into law.

    “We kept on mounting pressure on him to remove Jibrin or else he will pay for it.

    “It became unbearable when Jibrin was allegedly summoning heads of MDAs to his house on the budget. Members also resorted to going cap in hand to Jibrin for inclusion of some projects in the budget.

    “When President Muhammadu Buhari returned the budget and the National Assembly was asked to review the padded areas, the Speaker called Jibrin for an update. But in what appeared a snub, he told Dogara: ‘Will you come down to my house to see what we are doing?’ He disrespected the Speaker who appointed him into office.”

    Responding to a question, the source added: “Certainly, Jibrin will go on suspension for his affront against the leadership of the House. We won’t tolerate indiscipline.”

    Another ranking member said Jibrin ran into trouble following an agreement between the Presidency and the National Assembly to jack up the Army and the Air Force estimates by N15billion.

    The source said: “There were claiming for credit for the increase in the votes for the Army and the Air Force. Besides, members of the Appropriation Committee were shocked that there was subtle demand for gratification by a member.”

    “The Committee was uncoordinated because of Jibrin’s attitude. In fact, most members of the committee had little input into the budget,” the source said, adding:

    “ The Executive arm was also tired of Jibrin’s misdemeanour. At a point, some members of the Executive were always asking Dogara: ‘when will you remove that boy? Won’t there be sanctions from the House for those involved in budget padding?’ We got to this sorry state.”

    A second term House member said: “We warned the Speaker against appointing Jibrin as the chairman of the Appropriation Committee because when he headed the Committee on Finance, his action made ex-Speaker Aminu Tambuwal to weep one day over a budgetary matter. This incident happened in the 7th National Assembly.

    “Ex-Governor Rabiu Kwankwaso prevailed on the former Speaker not to suspend Jibrin. Tambuwal’s brother, Kwamkwaso’s bosom friend and the ex-governor asked his friend to beg the ex-Speaker to forgive Jibrin.

    “All these people are alive; you can crosscheck these facts.

  • $2.1b arms scandal: ‘I collected N100m approved by Jonathan’

    $2.1b arms scandal: ‘I collected N100m approved by Jonathan’

    Former presidential aide Dr. Doyin Okupe, yesterday admitted collecting more than N100million from the Office of National Security Adviser(ONSA) when Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd.) was in charge.

    The former Senior Special Assitant (Media and Publicity) to former President Goodluck Jonathan said part of the cash was a N10milion vote to furnish his rented apartment.

    The ex-President approved the release of the funds from his security vote, Okupe said.

    He also faulted the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission(EFCC) for making his heart-related challenge, called sinus bradycadia, public.

    Okupe and his companies are under probe for allegedly receiving N162million illicit payments to him and his companies by Dasuki  and Chanchaga Local Government Area in Niger State.

    In a reaction to his intermittent grilling by the EFCC, Okupe, who opened up on his Facebook page, said he used the funds allocated to him to run his office between 2012 and 2015.

    He was hired in 2012 by Jonathan for propaganda purpose against the opposition, which was critical of the past administration.

    Giving the details of how he collected money from the ex-NSA, he also confessed that his company secured contract from Chanchaga Local Government Area in Niger State.

    He said:  “The initial N50m was approved by the President to be paid to me from his security vote. N10m was to furnish my rented living apartment and another N10m for my office. The balance N30m was approved as take-off grant.

    “The N10m I received from the ONSA monthly was to run my office, pay salaries of staff, including overheads, pay expenses for our numerous press conferences, pay for publications in newspapers, magazines, local and foreign, television programmes, bulletins, and media consultants who assist and facilitate our work. I had about 23 staff, 11 were graduates out of which five were masters degrees holders.

    “ The second N50m was approved again by Mr. President when I reported to him that the monthly allowance had been cut from N10m to N5m and that I was no longer in position to keep running a one hour NTA network programme called INSIGHT which was aired 9-10am every Friday.

    “We paid NTA about N1.2m monthly for airtime. Two presenters were paid N600, 000 monthly.

    The lead presenter on Insight earned N400,000 and the second presenter earned N200,000. We paid for tapes and editing per programme. Besides, we also pay honorarium for guests either directly or in form of hotel bills for those outside Abuja or transportation.

    “This cost averagely N500,000 weekly or about N2m monthly. All in all, we spend about N4m monthly on the programme. Mr. President promised to help with the expenses. About a few months later when we had incurred some debts the NSA sent me this N50m which was to cover the cost of the program for 12 months.

    “I am not a thief. I have only two houses in Lagos and in my hometown. The monthly allowance was not my salary. It was meant to be used to run the office. 40% went on salaries. Salary sheets with names and offices of employees were submitted to EFCC.

    I was paid a salary of N853,000 per month through the office of the SGF.”

    On the N76.5m contracts awarded to his firm, Romix Soilfix, by Chanchaga Local Government Area of Niger State, Okupe said the firm was “one of the over 20 construction companies who were duly awarded contracts for rural roads some five years ago by the Niger State Government”.

    He said the jobs were delayed because of irregular payment to contractors by the council.

    Okupe added:  “The job is still ongoing. The relationship of this to my service as senior special assistant to President is still not clear.”

    Okupe faulted the EFCC for allegedly making his heart-related challenge, called sinus bradycadia, public.

    He said: “I was born with sinus bradycadia, a non-disease based slowness of the heart. It precluded me from vigorous exercise from childhood but I have, by God’s grace, been able to live a normal and active life.

    “With age, the slowness grew worse and life threatening. I sought medical help and went through a procedure at the Arrhythmia Cardiac Research Centre in Atlanta, where this defect was corrected. It was just a year ago and I am still under satellite monitor from the USA. This is what I revealed to the EFCC and they made it a public issue.”

  • N4.7bn election fund scandal: Ekiti erupts in protest

    N4.7bn election fund scandal: Ekiti erupts in protest

    The alleged involvement of Governor Ayo Fayose of Ekiti State in the sharing of N4.7 billion released for the 2014 governorship elections in Ekiti and Osun states yesterday sparked a massive protest in Ado Ekiti, the state capital.

    Thousands of protesters stormed the streets, condemning what they termed the looting of the treasury in the midst of widespread suffering by the majority of the people.

    They asked the governor to resign, having failed to pay civil servants for the sixth month running while he has  billions of naira in his own personal account.

    The protesters declared their support for the anti-corruption crusade of President Muhammadu Buhari and called on the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to bring Fayose and others who have been indicted to book.

    The anti-corruption agency during the week named Fayose as a major beneficiary of the slush fund.

    Consequently, it restricted the governor’s Zenith Bank accounts, which it said were used in sharing the alleged loot.

    Fayose has denied any wrongdoing and claimed that the bank offered to sponsor his election  campaign.

    The governor’s denial made no impression on the protest organisers, including Be The Change Organisation (BCO),  which mobilised labour unions, the Conference of Nigeria Political Parties (CNPP), artisans, market women, youth organisations and student bodies, to join in the Fayose-must-go rally.

    They took off from the  Fajuyi Roundabout in Ado-Ekiti at about 8.50 am, carrying placards with inscriptions such as ‘Support Anti-Corruption Crusade, Probe Executive Looting in Ekiti’; ‘What Happened to Ekiti Airport Fund?’; ‘Fayose Must Go’; ‘ Fayose is a Disgrace to Ekiti People’; among others.

    From the Fajuyi Roundabout, they moved to  Okesa, Ojumose and finally Okeyinmi Roundabout, throwing jibes at the governor.

    They distributed leaflets to traders, commercial drivers, pedestrians and bystanders, detailing how the state treasury is being allegedly looted and the personalities and corporate organisations believed to be involved.

    Officers and men of the  Ekiti State Police Command were on hand to ensure that the rally did not get out of control or hijacked by hoodlums.

    Executive Director of BCO, Mrs. Omotunde Fajuyi, said Ekiti people were embarrassed by the EFCC allegation against the governor and declared that all Nigerians must support any move to recover the people’s commonwealth from looters.

    Mrs. Fajuyi said: “We support President Buhari’s anti-corruption crusade. We have come out to protest the  looting of our money, corruption in government and the scandals dogging  this government in Ekiti.

    “Workers are dying at home. We want Fayose to explain what he has done with the allocations he has so far collected because he has received more than N50 billion as allocation since he came to power.

    “Fayose claims to be a Christian. He must come out clean and give account to the people of Ekiti State, and he must submit himself and all his aides and associates to the anti-corruption agencies for investigation .”

    A youth leader, Adeoye Aribasoye, challenged Fayose to explain what he did with the ecological funds and the N9.6 billion bailout funds he received from the Federal Government.

    Aribasoye said: “We have a governor who has over N4 billion in his account. He is the only one who can explain  what he has done with all the funds he has received from  the federal authorities.

    “He must explain the N2.4 billion ecological funds because we don’t know what has happened to the money. He must answer for the revelations of Ekitigate.

    “Pupils and students of public schools have been at home for over four weeks due to the strike embarked upon by civil servants and teachers.”

    The court-validated Chairman of Trade Union Congress (TUC), Kolawole Olaiya, urged the EFCC to probe the whereabouts of the N9.6 billion bailout money released for the payment of workers, pensioners and past political office holders.

    Olaiya said: “Corruption is responsible for the inability of Ekiti State Ggovernment to pay workers’ salaries for six months.

    “Ekiti workers still believe that the N9.6 billion bailout is kept somewhere and we urge the EFCC to institute a probe into this fact so that workers can receive their six-month salary arrears and secure their future.

    “Government is created for the  welfare and security of the people and Governor Fayose has done nothing to improve the lives of the people and secure their today and their future.

    “Enough of these lies. Ekiti people must be liberated.

    “Today in Ekiti State, public primary and secondary school students, including those in private schools, are now paying taxes.

    “This must stop. It is at variance with the 1999 Constitution; imposition of obnoxious taxes in Ekiti State must stop.

    “We want Ekiti State workers to note that Fayose is nobody’s friend.Teachers, civil servants, public servants, local government workers, artisans, driver unions, etc must note that Fayose is not their friend.

     “Workers are dying for non-payment of salaries for six months, including pensioners. Fayose must be brought to book, not minding Section 308 immunity.

    “It is criminal not to pay workers and pensioners for six months. The federal government sent N9.6 billion to Ekiti State as bailout, how was the bailout expended and who are the beneficiaries?

    “What accrues to the state as Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) is not known to the people.”

    Speaking on behalf of artisans, Idowu Ayegbe said: “We regret all the burden the governor has

    imposed on us in Ekiti in form of levies and taxes on our pupils.

    “We are not happy with what the governor is doing, including his attacks on the President.”

    The state CNPP spokesman, Ayo Adelabu, demanded Fayose’s resignation from office in the face of new evidence of alleged corruption.

    Adelabu said : “Fayose should resign  from office over his failure to live up to people’s expectations.

    “He should come out and defend himself in the N4.7 billion arms deal scandal and we also challenge him to explain to Ekiti people how he has spent six months allocation without payment of workers’ salaries.

    “The CNPP warns Fayose to stop abusing Mr. President who has been enjoying the full support of the majority of Ekiti people.

    “The CNPP strongly condemns Ekiti State legislators who have turned themselves into political slaves in the hand of Fayose.

    “The governor should also come out and explain the N2.3 billion loan he took from a bank.

     “The CNPP advises Governor Fayose to immediately stop the flyover bridge project and caution his political thugs against the attack of innocent people in the state.”

    Meanwhile, an interest group, Ekiti Redemption Group (ERG), has called on Fayose to pay all the six-month arrears of workers’ salaries or face a legal action and “unending protests”.

     The group gave Fayose a seven-day ultimatum to pay all arrears of salaries and pensions failure of which the administration will be dragged to court to explain how treasury is being managed.

    ERG National Coordinator, Morakinyo Ogele, in a statement yesterday  said Fayose’s campaign was anchored on stomach infrastructure but expressed surprise that his administration has unleashed hunger, hardship and untimely death on the people through poverty and financial recklessness.

    Ogele said: “It is unbelievable that Fayose is concentrating on useless projects like a flyover while civil servants are dying as a result of not having money to take care of themselves and their families.

    “It is amazing that government is owing civil servants six months salaries. Fayose has thrown the welfare of the people away and prefers useless projects, criticizing the  Federal Government and wasting millions of Naira on advertisements.

     “There is no doubt that Ekiti State government is confused and chasing anti-people programmes. A responsible government should see to the welfare of the people and where government is irresponsible, such a government should be thrown out.

     “It is high time we told Fayose  to resign immediately. Ekiti State government is hereby out on notice to pay all the arrears of civil servants within seven days otherwise I will not hesitate to mobilize the people for mass action and protest and at the same time drag the government to court.”

    Other residents of the state are also not amused by the allegations against the governor.

    One of them, Dare Awe described the EFCC action as “a divine intervention in the affairs of Ekiti.”

     He said: “Fayose must be ready to carry his cross because this is  a divine intervention in the affairs of Nigeria. This guy has been lying to us that the election that brought him to office was clean whereas it was sponsored with money meant for purchase of weapons.

     “We are suffering in this state but the guy is only concerned about how he will make money. What have we benefited since he came to power?

    “Our image has been dented within and outside the state because of his action.”

     Segun Adaralegbe expressed regret for “voting for this man in 2014 because we believed he would make a difference.”

    “What made me vote for him then was his statement that he had changed and matured and would never misbehave if given another chance.

    “I mobilized members of my family and neighbours to the nearest polling station to vote for him but we have all realized that electing this man again was a big mistake. People find it difficult to survive, salaries are not paid and he imposed heavy taxes on us.

    “The latest revelation on arms funds has added insult to our injury. There is a popular saying among drivers’ union that says: ‘if you eat alone you will die alone’. Fayose must be ready to face the consequences of his action because he has brought shame to all of us.”

    Gbenga Faleye said the revelation by former PDP Secretary, Dr. Tope Aluko on the deployment of cash to manipulate the 2014 election was true after all saying the EFCC has what he called “iron cast evidence” against Fayose.

    “I think the EFCC did its home work well this time around to come out with the facts and figures we are seeing in the newspapers now and it is now left for Fayose to defend himself but we are all watching how events will unfold”.

    James Arowosafe said: “We know that the EFCC is acting the script of the APC government. They have been looking for ways to nail him by all means since he came back to power but I know that they will fail.

    “They started with the spurious court case before his inauguration and their lawmakers made attempts to impeach him and they also used the allegation of Ekitigate against him. My brother, I am a die-hard supporter of Fayose and I won’t deny him.

     “Is he the only governor in Nigeria? Why this crackdown? Is it because of his endless criticisms of Buhari? They should know that what goes around comes around, are they telling us that all those in APC are saints?”

     To Lekan Aborisade, the EFCC crackdown on Ekiti is needless accusing the Federal Government of turning the agency to an instrument of persecution.

     “Whether they like it or not, Fayose is our governor and will remain our governor till 2018. Enough of this media trial, the man is still innocent until proven otherwise by the court. I believe that as he surmounted other hurdles earlier, he will overcome this one.”

  • Re: Arms scandal and NPAN’s moral predicament

    SIR: I really felt embarrassed by Mohammed Haruna’s assertion that ‘…after all there was nothing illegal about the compensation…’ in his defence of the newspapers that collected N10m or was it N9m from the Dasukigate sleaze, in his column titled above.

    No, Mallam Mohammed. That money given to the newspapers as compensation is allegedly a stolen property. Legally, both the giver and the receiver of such funds are guilty, if proved. By law, no amount of feigning of ignorance of the source can get the receiver off the hook. The onus lies on the newspapers to have carried out their investigation in determining the source and propriety of the funds before accepting the Greek gift. Indeed, there would not be any point in prosecuting any one involved in the Dasukigate beside Dasuki himself, if Haruna’s assertion is left unchallenged.

    The newspapers must therefore be prodded to pay back that money and later plead for leniency, not to be prosecuted.

     

    • Muhammad bn Umar,

    baayaru@gmail.com

  • Ibori: Met Police in bribery scandal

    Ibori: Met Police in bribery scandal

    The London Metropolitan Police investigating a case of money laundering against former Delta Sttate governor, Chief James Ibori have been accused of bribery and corruption by Mr.BhadreshGohil, a lawyer who represented Ibori.

    According to several United Kingdom (UK) newspapers published yesterday, there have been calls for an independent investigation into the bribery allegations leveled against the police. According to the Sunday Times of London, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) is currently facing “serious questions” over allegations of bribery that could jeopardise investigations into Ibori’s case.

    “ The Crown Prosecution Service  (CPS) is facing serious questions over an alleged cover-up that could jeopadise the high-profile conviction of a billionaire Nigerian politician.

    “ The crisis follows the dramatic collapse of a case involving BhadreshGohil, a lawyer who represented James Ibori, a former governor of Nigeria’s oil-rich Delta state. Gohil was cleared at Southward Crown Court last week after the CPS withdrew a charge of perverting the course of justice.

    “ Gohil had been accused of leaking fabricated documents to media organizations and MPs on the home affairs select committee. The documents claimed a police officer involved in the Ibori inquiry had received corrupt payments from RISC Management, a private detective agency that worked for Ibori.

    “The decision to prosecute Gohil backfired when CPS lawyers were accused of withholding key documents, which could have proved police corruption.”

    The Guardian of London also reported that the CPS was accused of suppressing police corruption evidence in what has been called a “misconduct of a particularly serious nature”.

    The paper said: “The accusation has been made in the trial of two men charged with fabricating claims of corruption  involving Metropolitan police officers. The trial collapsed last Thursday at Southwark crown court in London after senior lawyers at the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decided to abandon the case. The CPS said new information has come to light, but did not elaborate.  It did not comment ibt he allegation of serious misconduct.”

    Mr. Gohil has been accused of perverting the course of justice by faking documents to make it look as though,  the Metropolitan Police were taking bribes. Gohil, who had already pleaded guilty to a charge of money-laundering said he was trying to expose corruption in the police.

    “ I was a whistle-blower and instead of investigating what I had uncovered and put forward, I was persecuted,” he said.  In court, defence lawyers had alleged that there was “clear and compelling evidence” of police accepting bribes in return for “unlawfully providing sensitive information” to private detectives. It was also alleged that the police own investigation into the matter was “deliberately designed to find no evidence of corruption and that the prosecution service “deliberately withheld evidence.”