Tag: Senate

  • Summon, summon and  more summon in Senate

    Summon, summon and more summon in Senate

    THE Senate has been a beehive of activities in the last two weeks for the right and wrong reasons. Apart from consideration of motions and bills, the upper chamber had in audience at least five top government functionaries.

    An ill cultured senator unashamedly unleashed his brash mannerism on his colleague provoking in the process a wave of condemnation to himself and the institution of the Senate.

    The Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Mallam Abubakar Malami was one of those who appeared before the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Public Petitions to clarify why it became necessary for him to drag Senate President, Abubakar Bukola Saraki and his deputy Ike Ekweremadu, to court over alleged forgery of Senate rules 2011.

    Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir David Lawal and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Geoffrey Onyeama on their parts, appeared to throw light on alleged irregularities and lopsidedness of a list of 47 ambassadorial nominees sent to the Senate for consideration and confirmation by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Bayelsa, Ebonyi, Plateau and Ondo States Senators raised objections to the list questioning why their states were left out in the compilation of the list of nominees.

    The Senate has however resolved to begin immediate screening of the nominees following recommendations by its Foreign Affairs Committee which said among others that states omitted in the list lacked qualified career diplomats to be nominated.

    Senators from the affected state felt otherwise. For them, fair is fair especially in the compilation of a list of 47 in a country of 36 states.

    As it stands, Bayelsa, Ebonyi, Plateau and Ondo States may have to wait for the list of non career ambassadorial nominees which insiders say does not necessarily has to do with knowledge of diplomatic nuances but created essentially for political patronage.

    Central Bank of Nigeria Governor, Godwin Emefiele was also in the Senate to brief the lawmakers on the dwindling economic fortunes of the country especially why the country’s economy appears not to respond to fiscal and monetary policies aimed at retooling it.

    The CBN boss who appeared in camera was said to have painted a gloomy picture about the economy but also educated the lawmakers about monetary measures in the works to rescue the economy.

    Minister of Finance, Kemi Adeosun, also came calling on the Senate for the same purpose Emefiele was invited.

    Senate President, Abubakar Bukola Saraki, inaugurated a public hearing on the urgent need for effective implementation of the Joint Venture Cash Calls Obligations by the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation according to the appropriation of the National Assembly.

    The joint committee on Gas, Finance, Appropriation and Petroleum Resources Upstream was given the onerous task of unravelling the operations of the NNPC Joint Venture Cash Call Obligations with debt over hang standing at over $6 billion.

    The lawmakers, had busy weeks with their hands overflowing with parliamentary activities, you may say.

    The major snag about the sweeping invitation of government functionary by the Senate is the glaring inadequate preparation by Senators for the assignment.

    Most often than not when the invitees appear you discover to your consternation that deep and penetrating questions that would force out desires answers are lacking.

    Conflict of interests, business and pecuniary interests and political interests are also painfully exhibited by lawmakers to the extent that the probe from inception turns out a mission impossible.

    Some invitees are known to have seized the momentum to call the shot at committee sessions to the embarrassment of onlookers.

    A particular invitee last week enjoyed himself while Senators who summoned him disagreed and quarreled openly about the nature of questions to ask. It was so embarrassing that the invitee busied himself working his phone while the lawmakers bicker over procedural mode. It was as if nobody was in charge.

    This is not limited to committee work alone. Some Senators have shown that they lack mental and intellectual capacity to be in the chamber. As a result, debates on the floor are not only drab but lack dept. Necessary research that should engender quality serious engagement and contributions is not done.

    What follows is that expression of crude sentiments and unbridled ethnic emotion on important national issues become the norm rather than an exception.

    After over 16 years of unbroken democracy, it should be expected that quality of debate including investigative hearing should improve remarkably.

    Incidentally, rather than look up, quality of contributions both in the chamber and at committee assignments appear to be going down.

    Perhaps the low out put of some members may be a function of flawed recruitment process. A parliamentary recruitment process that focuses on ability to pay no matter the source of funds with less and less emphasis on educational background cannot be expected to produce the best.

    On the floor of the Senate a set of Senators make contributions continuously while majority of others busy themselves as perpetual bench warmers. The Senate may do well to educate —-

    This is certainly not the best of time for the House of Representatives. With the opening of investigative hearing into the allegations of sexual misconduct leveled against three  members and the sudden removal of the Appropriation Committee Chairman, Abdulmumin  Jibrin, the House may begin to quake.

    Speaker Yakubu Dogara may have calculated well to replace Jibrin with another Kano lawmaker, Mustapha Dawaki.

    Jibrin was one of those who campaigned vigorously for the position of House Speaker. He was apparently compensated with the Appropriation committee chairmanship when he lost out.

    Future events will tell the direction of the Senate and House.

  • Impeaching Buhari is not a possibility –  Marafa

    Impeaching Buhari is not a possibility –  Marafa

    …Says Senate committee reshufflement part of APC reconciliatory move
    The new Chairman of the Senate Committee on Petroleum Resources (Downstream), Kabiru Marafa (Zamfara) on Friday ruled out any possibility of the Senate impeaching President Muhammadu Buhari.

    According to him, no serving senator is contemplating such impeachment.

    Media reports had last week claimed that there were moves to impeach the President.

    Marafa, who is the spokesman of the Senate Unity Forum Senators, said the report must be a heavy joke.

    He spoke with State House correspondents after meeting with President Buhari at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    He said: “In legislature, we crack a lot of joke. I will only describe that as heavy joke. Nobody is contemplating that. It is not a possibility and God’s willing it will not happen in this assembly.

    While noting that the reshufling of the Senate committees on Thursday was normal in parliamentary, he said that it was part of reconciliation between the All Progressive Congress (APC) and the Senate.
    He said: “I think reschuffling of committees is not new in any parliament. What made that of yesterday a little new is the circumstances of the emergence of this leadership and what followed.

    “What happened yesterday is a result of the efforts the party has been putting in for reconciliation in the last few days,” he said.

    He also admitted that peace has returned to the Senate.

    “Yes, as long as the party comes in and the will of the party is respected. We are not at loggerhead with anybody. It is not like we hate somebody. The current Senate President, Bukola Saraki, has been one of my very close friend and senior in the 7th assembly. What you saw happened is what I will describe as loyalty to the party. The constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria recognizes only the party, it doesn’t recognize any individual.

    But he disclosed that it is the party that has the final say on whether to withdraw the cases in court.

    He said: “We didn’t go to court because we didn’t like the face of those that emerged, but this is the will of our party. During the 7th assembly, we accorded the ruling party at that time the utmost cooperation and we knew the committees that we were given that time.

    “But now, we are in power it is our own time and we should be accorded all the necessary cooperation. We should be seen to respect the party. If the party says withdraw the case, we will on to withdraw the case,” he said.

    Stressing that the relationship between executive and legislature at any level is like relationship of husband and wife, he was optimistic that the crisis between his state governor, Abdulaziz Yari and the State House of Assembly will soon be resolved.

    “So there is nothing knew as far as I’m concerned. We belong to the same political party and we are one. We are on top of the situation and we are trying to calm the nerves and look at the problem from its root. We will resolve the issues amicably. By our tradition and culture, Zamfara has never had that kind of problem.” He said

    According to him, the ongoing bombing of oil pipelines in the Niger Delta is more injurious to the region.

    He called on them to come to the table to resolve whatever grievances they have.

    On his visit to President Buhari, he said: “The President is the Minister of Petroleum Resources and the committee I was given yesterday relates to the Ministry. As my father and leader, I will not start anything without seeking for his blessings. He has prayed for me and I can face the assignment headon.””For the umpteenth time, the IYC call on the Aides and Advisers to President Buhari to properly advise him on how to solve the current hostilities in the Niger Delta region and equally display a determination to resolve the problem as his predecessors did.

    “Only a sincere and holistic dialogue with the people of the Niger Delta region which is aimed at addressing the remote causes of recurrent militancy can bring permanent peace to the Niger Delta region. This can only happen when President Buhari as the political leader of Nigeria come down to the negotiation table,” the statement said.

  • ‘Adeosun must appear before Senate today’

    ‘Adeosun must appear before Senate today’

    Finance Minister, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, was yesterday asked to appear before the Senate today to brief the upper chamber about measures the Federal Government is taking to shore up the country’s dwindling resources.

    The directive followed the failure of the Minister to brief the Senate yesterday as scheduled.

    Senate Leader, Mohammed Ali Ndume, informed the Senate in plenary that Mrs. Adeosun sent a message that she was held up at the Federal Executive Council meeting and therefore could not attend the scheduled briefing.

    Ndume said the Senate should give the minister another date to appear for the briefing.

    Minority Leader, Godswill Akpabio who seconded the motion observed that it was Mrs. Adeosun that picked yesterday and wondered why she failed to honour the invitation.

    Akpabio said the minister should have taken cognizance of the fact the FEC meeting would hold  on the day she chose.

    “We would not take it as a slight and disrespect for the Senate. We will take it as a mistake on her part but it should not repeat itself again because the minister ought to have known about the FEC meeting,” Akpabio said.

    Senate President, Bukola Saraki ruled that Mrs. Adeosun must appear before the Senate today, arguing that the issue of the economy is very important and Nigerians needed to be informed about what is happening.

    He said: “She must be here tomorrow (today) at the end of council meeting because we are here. It is important for Nigerians to know what is happening.”

    The Central Bnak of Nigeria Governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele had briefed the Senate on Tuesday on the same subject matter.

  • Fed Govt’s $6b cash call indebtedness unacceptable, says Senate

    Fed Govt’s $6b cash call indebtedness unacceptable, says Senate

    • ‘$5.9b lost to oil theft’

    The Senate yesterday said the country’s current cash call indebtedness standing at over $6 billion is unacceptable.

    Senate President Bukola Saraki, stated this while inaugurating a public hearing on the urgent need for effective implementation of the Joint Venture Cash Calls Obligations by the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) according to the appropriation of the National Assembly.

    The Joint Committee on Gas, Finance, Appropriation and Petroleum Resources Upstream was given the task of unravelling the operations of the NNPC Joint Venture Cash Call Obligations.

    Saraki noted that as part of the legislative agenda of the 8th Senate, it set among others, a mandate to block economic leakages, improve on constitutional powers of investigating Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) of government with a view to exposing corruption, inefficiency and waste in the conduct of government business.

    He said as a responsible arm of government with the hopes of millions of Nigerians resting on their shoulders, “we are disturbed with the frequent distortions that keep coming out of the oil and gas industry.”

    He said: “Despite the fact that NNPC has a larger amount of the proceeds from the joint venture, it worries the parliament to know that it has consistently been defaulting in payment of its own counterpart funding of projects.

    “There is no doubt also that there is still lack of clarity in the current financial regimes, royalties and taxes in the oil and gas industry.

    “The NNPC is expected to lead in public disclosures of financial dealings earned and its expended revenues.

    “This is vivid with the confusing and conflicting figures reeled out during reconciliation process among the agencies responsible for the receipts of funds meant for the federation accounts.”

    Saraki said at a period of disturbing and increased pipeline vandalism in the Niger Delta region, “the current cash call indebtedness standing at over $6 billion is a big problem staring at our economic health.”

    He noted that the 2013 Nigeria Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (NEITI) report submitted to the Senate on June 15 this year clearly showed that the huge sums of money that were not remitted to the Federation Account between 2005 and 2013 by the NNPC amounted to about $12.9 billion.

    Meanwhile, the  Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) has said over $5.9 billion was lost to oil thieves in 2013 alone.

    Its Executive Secretary, Mr Waziri Adio, who spoke in Abuja, lamented  that of this huge financial loss, $4.7 billion was lost to pipeline vandalism while another N20 billion was lost due to delay in payment made by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and its subsidiaries.

    “NNPC and its subsidiaries were given 90 days to pay N20 billion, though they paid the amount but could not meet up with the credit grace period given to them by the government.

    “If we calculate all the money that the country lost and put in fixed deposit at 12 per cent rate in one transaction, the country lost N13 billion and N7 billion respectively,’’ he said.

    He also said  $600 million was under paid due to under assessment, as a result of non renewal of expired memorandum of understanding (MoU) with some oil companies.

    “We signed MoU with some oil companies that expired and because we did not renew the MoUs, the oil companies used a particular pricing methodology called realisable price.

    “Government wanted oil companies to use official selling price; if we calculate the difference between official selling price and realisable price, the country lost $599 million  in one year,” he told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN).

    He said the money was lost due to under payment and under assessment because the oil companies were using realisable price instead of official price on expired MoUs.

    Adio also recalled that the country lost $5.18 billion to crude-for-product swap and oil shore processing arrangement in one year.

  • Senate resolves to begin screening of ambassadorial nominees

    Senate resolves to begin screening of ambassadorial nominees

    —Ebonyi, Ondo, Plateau candidates failed appointment criteria, says Senate report

    The Senate on Wednesday resolved to commence immediate consideration and screening of 47 career ambassadorial nominees sent to it by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    The list of the ambassadorial nominees was submitted to the Senate on June 9th, 2016 for consideration and confirmation.

    The resolution of the upper chamber followed the recommendations of its committee on Foreign Affairs which considered as series petitions alleging irregularities and lopsidedness in the appointment of the nominees.

    The Senator Monsurat Sunmonu headed committee which considered the petitions recommended that the screening of the nominees should begin immediately.

    Vice Chairman of the committee, Senator Shehu Sani presented the report of the committee to Senate in plenary.

    The reported stated that from the presentation of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Mr. Babachir David Lawal who appeared before the committee to clarify issues surrounding the criteria for the appointment, candidates from states that were not represented in the list of 47 did not meet the requirements for appointment.

    The report also said that some senior officers from the omitted states either did not meet the required minimum of 30 months to their retirement or fell short of other criteria used for the appointment.

    The committee said that from its findings due process appeared to have been followed in the appointment of the nominees.

    The report said that the SGF assured that President Buhari would to address the seeming lopsidedness with the appointment of non-career ambassadors.

    The committee said that its findings informed its recommendation that the Senate should proceed with the screening of the nominees.

    It however urged the Federal Government to quickly submit the list of non-career ambassadors to assuage the feeling of marginisation  by some states.

    It asked the government to sustain the tradition of submitting the list of career and non-career ambassadorial nominees at the same time.

    The upper chamber adopted all the recommendation of the committee and resolved to begin the screening of the nominees.

    Senators from Bayelsa, Benue, Kogi, Ondo, Plateau, Taraba had raised objection to the list because their states were not represented.

    After the resolution, Senator Emmanuel Paulker (Bayelsa State) insisted that “fairness is fairness.”

    Paulker said that he expected that with 47 appointments, at one would go to each state of the federation while the remaining 11 may be used to favour some states.

    He said that Bayelsa has many level 16 officers in the Foreign Affairs Ministry.

    He added that the Federal Character principles should have been adopted.

  • Melaye: Senator Tinubu writes IGP

    Melaye: Senator Tinubu writes IGP

    Senator Oluremi Tinubu Monday wrote to acting Inspector General of Police Ibrahim Idris requesting adequate security following last week’s attack on her by Senator Dino Melaye.

    In the letter dated July 18, with the title: Request for police protection, the Lagos Central senator, said:   “During the proceedings of the Senate on Tuesday July 14, 2016, I had a cause to contribute to a matter of national importance.

    “Apparently dissatisfied by my contributions, Senator Dino Melaye threw caution to the winds, resorted to vulgar abuse of my person and wanted to assault me.”

    “It was the intervention of a number of colleagues which prevented Senator Melaye from unleashing physical attack on me.

    “However, as the leadership of the Senate did not call him to order in the circumstance, he proceeded to threaten my life without provocation whatsoever.

    “In view of Senator Melaye’s antecedent, particularly in the House of Representatives where a brawl led by him led to untimely death of a member, I have decided to not ignore his threat to my life. Therefore, I am compelled to urge you to use your good offices to provide me with adequate security.”

     

  • Varsity senate should set admission standard, says VC

    Vice-Chancellor of the Ahmadu Bello University (ABU) Zaria Prof. Ibrahim Garba has said the senate of universities should set standards for admission into their institutions.

    Garba spoke while answering questions at the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) Forum in Abuja.

    The vice-chancellor faulted the situation where the Joint Admission and Matriculation Board (JAMB) and the Ministry of Education set standards for admission into the university.

    “Universities have autonomy by law; each university should set its criteria for taking students.

    “But of course JAMB and the ministry are saying that because it is our country, we must have a policy that regulates, so that we have a good balance but not on quality.

    “A university senate is supposed to set standard for accepting students that it takes and train and graduate.

    “We are hoping that soon we will resolve this matter because it is getting more embarrassing.

    “Even the state universities have told the Federal Government that education is in the concurrent list in the constitution.

    “The Federal Government has no control and should not have control over a state university; they have a council appointed by the governor.

    “They can only fulfil NUC’s standard requirements, but not admission quota.’’

    He said the minister’s directive leading to the scrapping of the post-Unified Matriculation Examination (post-UTME) created an impasse in universities as they were yet to begin admissions.

    According to him, universities cannot take products of JAMB without further testing them.

    The vice-chancellor said universities, being the recipients of the candidates, should be able to select those they could train.

    “We found it as universities that post-UTME tests are the best to get the best.

    “JAMB is only trying to improve, but still not perfect to a point that we can trust.’’

    “Post-UTME has a history; even when it started, JAMB encouraged us to do it.

    “JAMB is improving, but it is not yet there because every year we receive these products and we see what they are,’’ he said.

    He said that in 2016, ABU had 49,000 applicants, who scored above 180 points while its admission capacity was 6,500.

  • Envoys’ list: Senate promises to be thorough

    The Senate has provided a template to screen 47 ambassadorial nominees sent to it for confirmation by President Muhammadu Buhari.

    Chairman, Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs, Monsurat Sunmonu, told reporters in Abuja that the Senate would ensure that Nigerians were represented wherever they are.

    The Oyo Central lawmaker said the nominees were essentially expected to demonstrate the ability and capacity to represent Nigerians well.

    She noted that the wellbeing of Nigerians wherever they are should be of importance to every Nigerian representative anywhere in the world.

    She said: “With 120 missions in the world, I want to ensure that Nigerians are well represented. The ability and capacity to represent Nigerians wherever they are, that is what I will look out for when the ambassadorial nominees appear for screening.”

    Sunmonu added that she would ensure that the missions were well furnished to create a conducive environment for the envoys, to boost the nation’s image and enable them to perform better.

    The explanation followed the apparent resolution of the controversy generated by the submission of the list.

    Some senators from Bayelsa, Ebonyi and Plateau states complained that their states were left out.

    This prompted the Senate to invite Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Mr. Babachir David Lawal and Foreign Affairs Minister, Geoffrey Onyeama, to its Foreign Affairs Committee, to clarify the criteria used for the nomination.

    Although the report of the committee had not be submitted, it appears issues surrounding the criteria were sorted out when Lawal and Onyeama appeared.

  • A senate going for own jugular

    A senate going for own jugular

    This is the likely result of any attempt to impeach Buhari now

    Perhaps nothing can be more amusing than the purported intention of the senate to impeach President Muhammadu Buhari. According to reports, the idea was part of the fallout of a session on the senate rules case of the senate’s principal leaders. It was reportedly suggested by Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe (PDP, Abia South), when the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, Senator David Umaru, read the report of his committee on the summoning of the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Mr. Abubakar Malami, over the suit.

    Senator Umaru reportedly told his colleagues that the AGF refused to honour their invitation. “A Senator suggested that the Inspector-General of Police, Ibrahim K. Idris be mandated to arrest him, but some of our colleagues said the IGP will not carry out the order because the matter is being influenced by the Presidency, “a senator reportedly said.

    He added: “It was at this point that Abaribe stood up and said, ‘we should go for the jugular.’ When he was asked to explain what he meant by the ‘jugular’, he said he meant the process of impeachment of Buhari should commence “. Naturally this led to disagreement between the All Progressives Congress (APC) senators and their Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) counterparts.

    That some senators could think the next thing to do at this point is to impeach President Buhari tells us that we must be having many jesters in the senate; or we have people who are too detached from the people they are representing. Although this impeachment idea has been denied by some senators, the fact that it was even contemplated at whatever level is bad enough; not to talk of making it public, because there is no smoke without fire. Apparently, the senators in the eighth National Assembly do not realise the contempt and disgust that Nigerians have for them. No doubt, President Buhari has his shortcomings, but that does not lie in the mouth of these senators. If, however, the idea of impeachment was kite-flying to see if Nigerians would fall for it, then the senators behind it are better told to perish the thought.

    Although by and large Nigeria’s senate since the return to civil rule in May, 1999 has been anything but distinguished, the current senate is something else. Like most other bad things in the country which has been growing progressively from bad to worse, the current senate would appear to be the worst within the period. This is not to say that there are no good senators among the pack; it is just like the case of the rotten eggs being by far more than the good ones. So, no matter how hard the good ones try to redeem the image of the upper chamber, the odious smell from the irritants and pollutants there brings such noble efforts to naught.

    Left to many Nigerians, they would not have wanted the AGF to appear before the senate that summoned him over the ongoing trial of the principal leaders of the National Assembly, but it is good that the AGF eventually made it to the place on Wednesday. You don’t count the toes of someone with nine toes in his presence; but the senate itself asked for the response the AGF gave it on the matter. Nothing could be more satisfying than the answer the AGF gave at the occasion to the effect that the suspects in the matter have a case to answer and should therefore face their trial in court.

    Given the manner the senate is wielding its power of summons; it is only a matter of time before such power is eroded. In one of the moments of its power-drunkenness, the senate had summoned the Chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, Danladi Umar, trying Dr Bukola Saraki, the senate president, over declaration of his assets to appear before it, even when the case was ongoing. Even if senators have the power to summon people, shouldn’t they know the limit of such powers? Why would a supposedly respectable senate want to intimidate anyone having to do with the trial of Dr Saraki, whether for alleged forgery or falsification of assets declaration; why? Indeed, this was the reason the Nigerians who felt the AGF should ignore the senate summons hold that opinion. But, we cannot afford to rubbish the upper legislative chamber today just because we do not have the right people there. If we allow such now, it would be difficult to return respectability to the place  tomorrow when, hopefully, we would have the right calibre of people in the chamber.

    The point must be made, or repeated if some others had made it before; that a senate that chose a man like Dr Saraki as its president should have known that he is  a potential candidate for the kind of experiences he is going through today, given his antecedents. So, those of them who installed him cannot now turn round to say some people are witch-hunting him simply because he is being tried for alleged crime or offence. Worse still, they cannot say it is the Nigerian senate that is on trial simply on account of that. It bears restating, as this paper had noted in an earlier editorial, that any senator who sufficiently feels concerned that it is the senate that is on trial on account of Dr Saraki’s arraignment has the opportunity of asking to be joined in the suit/s. Otherwise, all they are doing amounts to nothing but ranting of an ant. As far as Nigerians know, Dr Saraki is the one in the dock, and to the extent sthat none of the senators has asked to be joined in any of the suits, they had better forget this idea of telling us they are all on trial. Our senators should stop weeping louder than the bereaved in their own interest; otherwise the rest of us too could read meanings into their actions. In other words, we too would not be wrong to insinuate that the senators are in cahoots with Dr Saraki because they are afraid of the government’s anti-corruption war, or because (won ti f’ekuru di fere won lenu) their trumpets have been blocked with abunnan. Can we put anything beyond our ruling elite in a country where billions, rather than crops, are being harvested in a farmland?

    It is only in a senate without shame, direction or credibility that someone would suggest that the senators who took the senate rules alleged forgery matter to court should withdraw such suit at this point in time just because a resolution was passed in the senate that the rules were not forged; or risk suspension. Is it possible for the senate to be the prosecutor and judge in its own case? This is a matter that is already in court and has sufficiently generated interest among Nigerians. So, what would the senators who want the case withdrawn tell Nigerians (who supposedly they are representing) thereafter? Is that how to bring closure to such serious and sensitive issues? Ha! It is sickening that these are the kinds of characters in our senate.

    It is because of this same Dr Saraki that some elements in the House of Representatives that is led by Yakubu Dogara have decided to get immunity for the senate president and his deputy as well as the speaker, House of Representatives and his deputy. Even in what we thought were the most stinking eras in this fourth republic, no one contemplated such self-serving proposition as immunity for these elected officers. In a sane country, many of these senators would have been recalled to pave way for people who waited patiently to collect their fair share of shame when coming to the world; I mean more serious and credible people. Or, alternatively, as I said before, Nigerians would have stormed the place to flog out those who are selling and buying there; I mean those who have turned an otherwise hallowed chamber into a den of ‘cash and carry’.

    President Buhari may not be as popular today as he was about a year ago; many Nigerians know why, with corruption fighting back so fiercely in the country. All the shenanigans going on in the senate, and to some extent, the House of Representatives, are part of that battle to entrench corruption in the land. So, in spite of everything, Nigerians still know where the choice is, picking between the president and the senate; they would rather go for the former. What I am telling those of them in the senate who have ears with which they hear is that  if they say one would be gored to death by an animal with horns, it is not the kind of ‘horns’ that snails parade that we are talking about. It is baffling that many of our senators are behaving like someone who is being suspected of being a thief and is yet dancing around with a lamb.

    This senate is too weak and discredited to win any battle against the president, even as things stand.  Unless it wants to go for its own jugular; which would be better for Nigerians, to enable them put its inanities behind them. People with shame the size of a mustard seed would not be hell bent on treading this path of destruction that our senators are treading. They are just like the proverbial dog that is bent on not hearing the hunter’s whistle – adrfit and lost.

  • Senate, impeachment and immunity brouhaha

    Senate, impeachment and immunity brouhaha

    MUCH more than the House of Representatives, the Senate has in the past few months continued to seethe with plots, resentment and rebellion over issues that range most especially from impeaching President Muhammadu Buhari to fighting for immunity provision for top National Assembly (NASS) leaders. The brouhaha will continue for some time, though the plots and rebellions will end futilely. Both the immunity and impeachment controversies are wrapped essentially around the alleged forgery of Senate Standing Rules 2015 (as amended). The controversy-ridden election of Senate principal leaders last year instantly led to a division in the upper house and triggered various litigations from lawmakers and the government itself. Since then, Senate President Bukola Saraki has been engulfed in lawsuits over his asset declaration and, now, alleged forgery of Senate rules. His deputy, Ike Ekweremadu, is also dragged, screaming and kicking, into the fray.

    Having not known any peace since their elections as principal leaders, both Senators Saraki and Ekweremadu have inspired the demand for immunity for the four top leaders of the NASS, that is, including the two top leaders of the House of Representatives. The lower chamber has of course associated with the demand, but it is clearly evident that the Senate is keener than the House of Representatives in asking for immunity. Going by the Reps’ low amperage of keenness, it is, in fact, not certain that the amendment will scale the lower chamber. They do not feel the need for it as much as the Senate, for the Reps leaders have managed to establish peace and order in their chamber unlike the Senate where passion is increasingly inflamed over the flimsiest of reasons.

    The Senate’s bellicosity towards the executive has been attributed to the lawsuits against Senators Saraki and Ekweremadu over the forgery case and the asset declaration matter. A Senate majority believes that on account of the court cases the executive branch has underscored its hostility to the legislature, a hostility many lawmakers have begun to interpret as a deliberate design either to undermine and weaken the legislature, or control it. The arguments are specious and the logic far-fetched, but they are widely held and ardently defended. For instance, there is no other way to interpret the asset declaration case other than that it is private to Senator Saraki. It may have been connived at by members of the executive branch, but the substance of the case reflects legitimate public concerns about the lack of probity among highly placed officials.

    There is also no other way to interpret the alleged forgery case but to regard it as legislative skullduggery in high places, which a government concerned about official probity would be chary of condoning due to the illicit manner it appeared to confer unfair advantage on interested parties in a dispute or election. If the executive branch knew about the filing of the lawsuits, as it seems obvious, that fact does not vitiate its nuisance value or obviate the legal remedy being sought by a faction of the disputatious lawmakers and some interested members of the executive branch, especially the president himself, the attorney general, Abubakar Malami, and the secretary to the government of the federation, Babacir David Lawal.

    Senator Saraki is doubtless charismatic, even if the rubric of his political and public morality is abysmally faulty. He has managed very deftly to transform what was essentially his private battles to become public, Senate battles. And reflecting the regnant but appalling philosophy of the Senate, he apparently has the support of the majority of senators for the obvious reason of his ability to transcend ethnic and partisan divides. But he is not invincible. He may engage in repeated charm offensives and bewitch his colleagues with inscrutable talisman, but the cases against him are somewhat so damning as to be hard to subject to the sentiments that Senator Saraki has so profoundly and expertly trolled. He wishes that the cases against him can be politicised in a negotiable way to midwife a rapprochement between the Senate and the executive. He would trade anything for that peace. But the executive has remained implacable, a position that has made him allege that the presidency had been captured by a cabal.

    Senator Saraki’s failure to secure peace with the executive has sadly led him and the Senate to contemplate either immunity for himself and his deputy or, from rumours, impeachment of the president whom they describe as intransigent and combative. Senator Saraki’s loyalists have argued that no one talked of impeachment during Tuesday’s executive session. They instead interpreted the AGF’s initial refusal to honour the Senate’s invitation as disrespectful, deliberate and provocative. The AGF himself has stoked the controversy and, together with the rather unguarded and sometimes impulsive SGF, appears determined to ensure the battle is fought to the bitter end.

    But neither immunity nor impeachment would fly. The Senate’s principal leaders will be unable to get the consensus needed in both chambers to secure an amendment to provide for immunity. The timing, as House Majority Leader said, is awful, and the goal selfish and deplorable. Nor is the mood of the country ripe for granting immunity to any other public official other than the executives at both federal and state levels. If the Senate pushes the matter beyond what the people can bear, the public may very well storm the National Assembly and sack the legislators. The presidency, which had wished to subjugate the lawmakers, knows this very well, and may be baiting the legislature. The NASS should not embark on this senseless brinkmanship.

    In addition, the careless talk of impeachment, assuming it was really voiced, will certainly not fly. The country’s ethnic dynamics and insular and parochial politics will ensure that the constitutional provision of impeachment would hardly ever be activated or exercised. To impeach President Buhari, even if he were wrong and malevolent, would entail the North committing political self-immolation. For a region that resisted and exploited the death from natural causes of ex-president Umaru Yar’Adua in such an offensive and unenviable manner in 2010, it is unlikely they will embrace self-immolation. Even more, the president’s talisman is still working effectively. He may not be a natural democrat, and may even have contempt for democracy, rule of law, the judiciary and the press, but his onslaught against corruption, not to say the mind-boggling revelation of the cavalier manner highly placed officials stole public funds, has made many Nigerians to regard his opponents snidely. The president is clever enough to understand this, and he will work this liberating horse to death.

    Senator Saraki does not help the cause of democracy by refusing to subject himself wholeheartedly to judicial proceedings. He is presumed innocent. And if he really is, as he continues to reiterate, he should be eager to let the justice system take care of the allegations against him. For a man of his calibre, it is unlikely the courts will pervert the cause of justice. The fulsome manner he has whipped the Senate and the National Assembly as a whole into a frenzy does a lot of disservice to the legislative process, not to talk of the integrity of lawmaking in the country. He has refused counsel to resign and face the courts. Well, if he is going to continue to stand pat, let him at least not foul the system much more severely than the allegations against him presuppose.

    Unfortunately, Senator Saraki’s body language indicates he senses he will be quite unable to exculpate himself. If he is unwilling to let go now when he can do so with honour, he may be compelled to do so when he would have no bargaining chips left to play or clutch at. For now, though the lawsuits may be prolonged, it is difficult to see a stalemate developing. For sooner or later, the cases will end; and they will end, if law is the basis of the trial, with him holding the short end of the stick. And though he refuses to see it as clearly as the rest of the country, Senator Saraki’s quixotic search for face-saving devices, including immunity, not to say the impeachment rumoured in the upper chamber, will end in terrible ruination not only of him but also of his undiscerning loyalists whom he is piping to their disgrace.