Tag: Senator Iyiola Omisore

  • Osun Election: Our deal with Omisore, by Oshiomhole

    The National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Comrade Adams Oshiomhole has said that the party did not offer Senator Iyiola Omisore any financial inducement to gain his support during the rerun election conducted on Thursday, adding that the former Deputy governor never made any demand.

    Oshiomhole also gave reasons why the party disqualified the Minister of Women Affairs, Hajia Aisha Jummai Alhassan from contesting the governorship elections primary in Taraba state, saying the party was not convinced about the loyalty of the minister to the party.

    Addressing a news conference in Abuja, the former Edo State governor said the party gave Senator Omisore the opportunity to sponsor candidates to contest elections on the APC platform, stressing however that those saying the APC offered him money was out of place.

    He said “I said we had a negotiation and had a deal that has to do with the governance of Osun State. I didn’t go with money and I don’t have money to give to anybody. He didn’t ask and there was no basis for him to ask.

    “The word automatic ticket has meaning. Having regards to the provisions of electoral acts which makes primary mandatory, can you at the same time talk of automatic ticket? Even when I spoke to our National Assembly members, it is not that I don’t know that word exist, but I simply didn’t find it useful and never used it.

    “We agreed that he will have an opportunity for him to contest for a seat on APC platform. Not just for senate or House of Representatives, but also for house of assembly. That is why I said we spoke about the immediate which is the Osun election and going forward.”

    The APC Chairman said further that “Both the APC and the PDP recognizes that we needed to do business with the other minority parties that participated in the election and it wasn’t difficult to understand who to do business with if you want to influence the outcome of the election.

    “It was clear that the SDP was largely in control of those areas. If you want to do a Coalition, you identify the leaders who have influence and enter into negotiation. Why PDP were shouting in the morning, that they were going to challenge the rerun their leader went to Senator Omisore to persuade him to negotiate a possible working arrangement.

    “Recognizing the fact that SDP was critical to this conversation, we decided to also open negotiation with their leadership and I was impressed by his emphasis. He told us that, yes he has lost, but he believe that he can still win if we have a deal that seeks to address the primary purpose of his participation in the process which is the governance of the state and specific policy issues that were of concern to him.

    “We had a robust conversation and reached an agreement which I think is healthy. We didn’t have to negotiate about compensation or about paying money to anyone. The issue was about governance, education and how we can have a working relationship ahead of the general election and in future elections.

    “We were able to strike a deal that has to do with the specific issues that affect the welfare and the well being of the people of Osun State. Whereas Saraki failed to strike a deal with the SDP, we secured a deal with them and now APC, working with the SDP had huge influence in those areas and combining our efforts, it was not strange that at the end, we won.

    “For democracy to flourish, only people who can accept the pain of defeat should participate in an election because there must be a winner and a loser, but for PDP to take the position as if election is only free and fair if they win is not ideal.

    “When they win election in Cross River last month, we did not hear any voice, they won in Taraba, we did not hear any voice, INEC was perfect, but whenever they lost, INEC is colluding. We do not have the rigging no-how.”

    Speaking on why the Minister of a Women Affairs was disqualified, Oshiomhole said “as for the Honourable Minister of Women Affairs, she has issues that have to do with party loyalty. Our constitution is clear and it dictates that to contest elections or even hold office in the APC, you must be loyal to the party in every material concern.

    “From all she had said in the past and even her comments and general attitude during the screening, the NWC reviewed everything taken together and we arrived at the conclusion that she does not possess the level of loyalty that the APC requires for her to contest elections on our platform.

    “We made it clear when the defections happened that APC may well benefit from these defections if it helps us to be more critical in terms of who we give platform to contest elections and that there are core values that binds the APC together and they are non-negotiable.

    “The Electoral Act and the APC constitution forbid anyone from being a member of more than one political party at a time. You cannot be a member of APC and be a card carrying member of another party but when you have a situation where it would appear, based on what you know and based on what I know that someone is probably APC in the day time maybe for the purpose of retaining certain offices and they are PDP at heart.

    “Or if they are not PDP at heart, they are actually and simply a follower of a one-man permanent presidential candidate…then we have the right to ask ourselves if these attitudes and qualities are characteristics of an ideal member of an APC.

    “So, those are the reasons. We did not want to have a lengthy explanation to do but she knows why she was disqualified and we know why we denied her the use of our platform.”

    On the Minister of Communication, he said: “He admitted that he did not do the mandatory NYSC as provided for under the law and in his own judgment, his being a member of the House of Assembly in the state and now as a minister of the federal republic that these were enough sacrifices.

    “But for us as a party we know that NYSC is a mandatory scheme. It is not something you may elect to do or abstain from doing and my understanding of the NYSC Act is that no employer of labour is permitted to employ anyone who graduated under 30 years and who did not obtain an exemption for reasons as provided for in the NYSC Act.

    “So, for us, not participating in the NYSC raises very serious moral issue as well as legal issue. After interviewing him, we were convinced that….for our party, there are clear lessons we need to learn from our recent past when people… anyway, we were convinced that if he did not do NYSC, that for us was enough to disqualify him and we had to find the courage to do so.”

    While commending the people of Osun State for keeping faith with the party, Oshiomhole said: “We have seen over the period that the opposition party has always, whenever it is not winning election raise issues of rigging. But I do understand PDP is quick to suggest rigging in any election in which it is not favored by the electorates.

    “The Osun election was substantially free and fair. The fact that some votes were cancelled suggests that something’s went wrong the first day. But that those cancellations were effected by INEC also showed the independent of INEC to make decisions on the spot based on evidence on ground.

    “Reviewing the opinion of genuine monitors, you realize that the fact that it was inconclusive was accepted by both local observers and foreign observers. PDP disagreed with the idea of conducting elections in those places where the elections were cancelled.

    “There have been rerun elections in the past that favored the PDP. A lot of the governors today elected on the PDP platform especially in the south south are beneficiaries of inconclusive and inspite of our reservations, we had to accept those outcome.

    “In the Osun election, nobody can talk of landslide victory. If anyone had access to manipulate those figures, you will not rig election and do so half-heartedly to a point of leading to inconclusive election.”

  • Yuletide: Omisore hosts widows, pensioners, others

    Yuletide: Omisore hosts widows, pensioners, others

    The former Deputy Governor of Osun State, Senator Iyiola Omisore (Phd) FNSE, CON, has demonstrated his kindness and love to humanity by lifting retirees, pensioners and widows in Osun State.

    Senator Omisore at the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Secretariat, at Ogo Oluwa, Gbongan-Osogbo Road, Oshogbo on 31st December 2017, celebrated the end of the year’s get together with this group of hapless indigenes of Osun by distributing clothing materials and food items to them.

    Omisore condemned a situation where someone would have worked actively for the government for over 35 years and be neglected after retirement by a ‘callous government’ who refused to pay them their retirement benefits for over 12 months.

    The former Deputy Governor enumerated that the main reason for providing this succour is to wipe away their tears during the yuletide festive season. “It is our responsibility to bring joy to the less privileged and make them realise that their cry could still be heard in the state by people like us”.

    Senator Omisore in his speech emphasised the importance of giving, adding that giving to the needy should not be the job of the rich alone but a task for everyone who has the means in the society.

    He informed the people that his foundation has been giving to the needy for over 15 years and that he belonged to other global philanthropic organisations that give to the poor around the world.

    Omisore“Such institution includes the “I Will Give” programme which was initiated to help your neighbour in any way you can. I WILL GIVE is an innovative platform to expand domestic financing from organised philanthropy, community giving and corporate social responsibility. If I could join such organisations to help people in other communities across West Africa, why should I not bring such help to my own people?,” Omisore explained.

    He revealed that his yearly giving programme at Obafemi Awolowo Teaching Hospital Complex, (OAUTHC) marks 15 years this year. He used the initiative to bring joy to the hearts of the patients on January 1st every year, in order to wipe away their tears and give them hope.

    Speaking further, Omisore announced that the idea of giving to the pensioners, retirees, and widows in the State would become a weekly or monthly program. He implored other guests at the occasion to also give to widows and the needy in their communities, towns, or wards. He prayed that next year’s programme would be done at the government’s house where it would be like a home for everyone.

    The Chairman PDP Caretaker Committee and former member of the House of Representatives, Federal Republic of Nigeria, Hon. Ismaila Kolawole who was at the event to support Senator Omisore declared that the occasion was to bring joy to the heart of the retirees, pensioners, and widows who have been rendered powerless in the society making them realise that they still have a place in the society. He emphasised the necessity of showing love to people and assured them of a better life in 2018.

    Another guest at the event, Engr, Alhj Ishola Awotorebo, a former Minister for Water Resources, commended Senator Iyiola Omisore for his good work and prayed that God will always uplift him. He condemned the APC’s administration in the state that has caused a lot of damage to the masses including the less privileged in the society. Awotorebo enumerated various failures of the APC leadership to include unbridled fuel price increase in 2015 to the current scarcity of the essential commodity and the hyperinflation that are now making poor Nigerians to weep secretly. He said a change must come to the state by September 2018..

    Former member House of Rep and former chairman, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (LAUTECH), Dr. Muyiwa Oladimeji who was a former chieftain of the APC in the State, revealed that after studying Omisore’s philanthropic gesture, he and his members in the Lions Club International had to recommend Senator Omisore for the globally renowned  “Melvin Jones Fellow Award’’ — the highest award category in honours list of Lions Club International in 2014. This award is the highest form of recognition and embodies humanitarian ideas consistent with the nature and purpose of Lionism.  The recipient of this award becomes a model of exemplary service to his club and the community which it serves. Dr Iyiola Omisore was giving this prestigious award in 2014 at a global forum.

    Other people present at the occasion were PDP Women leader in Osun State, Mrs Comfort Ale; Legal Adviser to PDP in the South West, Barrister Ojo Williams; Former National Deputy Vice Chairman of PDP, Alhaji Tajudeen Oladipo; and a party chieftain, Dr. Bayo Faforiji. Also, some association of widows present to receive 50kg bags of rice and other food materials include: Mercy of God Widows Association, Itesiwaju Widows Association Ilesa West; Alubarika Widows Association, Olorunda; Daughters of Zion; Isokan Widows Association, Oredegbe Widows Association and Uncommon Favour Widows Association, Ife North.

  • Institution of safety engineers to Senator Omisore

    Institution of safety engineers to Senator Omisore

    The Nigerian Institution of Safety Engineers (NISE), an arm of the Nigerian Society of Engineers, will on Thursday, November 9, 2017 confer the former Deputy Governor of Osun State, Senator Iyiola Omisore, with its Award of Fellowship for his consistent promotion and vital support of the practice of engineering safety in Nigeria.

    The Award will be presented during the opening ceremony of the conference of the Institution scheduled to hold at Eko Hotel and Suites, Victoria Island, Lagos.

    In a letter signed by the National Chairman, Mr Abiodun Oyedepo, the Institution stated that it examines individuals and organizations who have consistently demonstrated the leadership role in making safety a priority in their organizations and in society.

    Individuals that are honoured with this fellowship awards are carefully selected, so as to acknowledge and encourage them for their achievements.

    The award will also serve as recognition by practising professionals that the awardee, Eng. (Sen.) Iyiola Omisore, FNSE, is considered a suitable role model for others in the nation and is to be given the honour and respect due to such.

    Eng. Senator Omisore, FNSE, is the Chief Executive Officer of Chisore Engineering Limited, an electrical engineering firm, which has been involved in the execution of many projects for blue-chip companies, banks and embassies, shipping companies, etc. He is also the CEO of Mechelec Consultants, an international Engineering consulting firm that consults for high profile international organizations and multilateral agencies.

    Senator Iyiola Omisore was conferred with the Nigerian Society of Engineers (NSE) Presidential Merit Award for Support and Contribution to the Development of the Society in 2007. Also, he was honored with the Prime Award for Remarkable Contribution to the Growth of Engineering Profession and Society during the celebration of NSE Golden Jubilee in 2008.

  • EFCC bail condition is stringent – Omisore

    EFCC bail condition is stringent – Omisore

    The former deputy governor of Osun State, Senator Iyiola Omisore has described bail condition by the anti-graft agency, the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) for his release as stringent.

    In a statement by his media aide, Diran Odeyemi, he explained that the EFCC in a letter to Omisore “after several hours of interrogation asked him to produce two serving Directors as sureties In any of the Federal Ministries or Agencies with landed property in millionaires’ quarters of Maitama or Asokoro area of Abuja.”

    According to him, the sureties must submit the original Certificate of Occupancy of their landed properties.

    He added: “We know too well of a standing instructions to serving civil servants not to stand as Sureties in any matter and wonder why EFCC is giving a condition they have already blocked. We will approach the court to seek Sen Omisore’s release and wonder why EFCC has turned itself to an agent of persecution instead of prosecution.”

  • PDP’s, Omisore’s first witness gives evidence

    PDP’s, Omisore’s first witness gives evidence

    Bola Ajao, the first witness of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate in the August 9 governorship election in Osun State, Senator Iyiola Omisore, yesterday gave evidence before the Election Petition Tribunal.

    Ajao, who is the PDP Secretary, told the tribunal that voters were allowed to be accredited and voted freely in the election.

    He was cross-examined by counsels to Governor Rauf Aregbesola, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Charles Edosonwan, Yomi Aliu, and Ayotunde Ogunleye.

    Ajao said his claim on the alleged rigging of the election was not witnessed by him, adding, “I was told by my party agents”.

    Responding to questions from Edonsonwan, he said: “I got to my Ward 8, Unit 9 of Ifelodun Local Government at 6:30 am on the election day, accreditation started by 8am and voting started at 12:30 pm.

    “I passed through the same process and I voted on that day. I did not leave my unit until after the election. My party lost in my polling unit. My testimonies on other units that our party is challenging are based on what I was told by my agents. I was not there.

    “Omisore contested for a senatorial slot in 2011, but lost along with other party candidates. We did not challenge the election in court. I don’t know the number of polling units we are challenging.”

    While being cross-examined by INEC’s counsel, Ajao said he followed all the processes required from accreditation to voting, adding that after accreditations, people were allowed to vote.

    In his answer to the question from APC counsel, the witness confirmed to the tribunal that all the result sheets for each of the local governments in contention were signed by PDP supervisors on the election day.

    The second and third witnesses, Kolapo Sikiru and Gbadebo Adeyemo, who claimed to be PDP ward supervisors in Ward 1 and Ward 2 of Osogbo Local Government, confirmed that their polling agents signed the result forms for each of the units, except for a few.

    Contrary to his claim that the result sheets of unit 2,3,4 and 5 of Ward 2 were not signed by his party agent, as deposed to in his witness statement, Gbadebo was confronted with the duplicate result for the units that were tendered by the petitioners’ counsel which bore the signature of the agents and the witness was dumbfounded.

    At this point, there were altercations between counsel to the petitioners and the first respondents, as the former accused the latter of interjecting the cross-examination of the witnesses at the detriment of the 20 minutes permitted to cross-examine the witness.

    The intervention of the judges brought the altercations under control.

    Edosonwan and Ogunleye said the testimonies of the petitioners’ witnesses had vindicated the respondents that the petition has no merit.

    They were optimistic that more of such vindication would unfold in the course of cross-examining other witnesses.

     

     

  • PDP’s, Omisore’s witness: I didn’t observe rigging

    PDP’s, Omisore’s witness: I didn’t observe rigging

    Bola Ajao, the first witness of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its candidate in the August 9 governorship election in Osun State, Senator Iyiola Omisore, yesterday gave evidence before the Election Petition Tribunal.

    Ajao, who is the PDP Secretary, told the tribunal that voters were allowed to be accredited and voted freely in the election.

    He was cross-examined by counsel to Governor Rauf Aregbesola, the All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Charles Edosonwan, Yomi Aliu, and Ayotunde Ogunleye.

    Ajao said his claim on the alleged rigging of the election was not witnessed by him, adding, “I was told by my party agents”.

    Responding to questions from Edonsonwan, he said: “I got to my Ward 8, Unit 9 of Ifelodun Local Government at 6:30 am on the election day, accreditation started by 8am and voting started at 12:30 pm.

    “I passed through the same process and I voted on that day. I did not leave my unit until after the election. My party lost in my polling unit. My testimonies on other units that our party is challenging are based on what I was told by my agents. I was not there.

    “Omisore contested for a senatorial slot in 2011, but lost along with other party candidates. We did not challenge the election in court. I don’t know the number of polling units we are challenging.”

    While being cross-examined by INEC’s counsel, Ajao said he followed all the processes required from accreditation to voting, adding that after accreditations, people were allowed to vote.

    In his answer to the question from APC counsel, the witness confirmed to the tribunal that the result sheets for each of the local governments in contention were signed by PDP supervisors on the election day.

    The second and third witnesses, Kolapo Sikiru and Gbadebo Adeyemo, who claimed to be PDP ward supervisors in Ward 1 and Ward 2 of Osogbo Local Government, confirmed that their polling agents signed the result forms for each of the units, except for a few.

    Contrary to his claim that the result sheets of unit 2,3,4 and 5 of Ward 2 were not signed by his party agent, as deposed to in his witness statement, Gbadebo was confronted with the duplicate result for the units that were tendered by the petitioners’ counsel which bore the signature of the agents and the witness was dumbfounded.

    At this point, there were altercations between counsel to the petitioners and the first respondents, as the former accused the latter of interjecting the cross-examination of the witnesses at the detriment of the 20 minutes permitted to cross-examine the witness.

    The intervention of the judges brought the altercations under control.

    Edosonwan and Ogunleye said the testimonies of the petitioners’ witnesses had vindicated the respondents that the petition had no merit.

    They were optimistic that more of such vindication would unfold in the course of cross-examining other witnesses.

     

     

  • Tribunal stops Omisore from tendering duplicate documents

    Tribunal stops Omisore from tendering duplicate documents

    The Osun State Governorship Election Petition Tribunal refused yesterday to take duplicate copies of electoral documents presented by Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate in the August 9 governorship poll, Senator Iyiola Omisore.

    The tribunal chairman, Justice Elizabeth Ikpejime, insisted that only Certified True Copies (CTCs) of election documents could be tendered from the bar.

    Omisore’s leading counsel Alex Izinyon, at the opening of hearing which was the first of 14 days allocated to the petitioner to make his case, sought to begin tendering of documents rather than calling witnesses for oral testimony.

    Izinyon, who led two others, Titus Ashaolu and Nathaniel Oke,  told the Tribunal that the petitioner was ready to tender Certified True Copies of Form EC.8A as well as duplicate copies of election results for individual polling units through the bar.

    According to him, he was presenting duplicating copies of the documents to save the tribunal time.

    He argued that objections to admissibility of duplicate copies could be taken at a later stage of the hearing, adding that there were a plethora of authorities to back his position.

    He was reminded by Justice Ikpejime that parties had agreed at pre-trial session that certified true copies would be tendered through the bar and with consent of parties.

    But Izinyon insisted that his suggestion was just the difference between six and half of a dozen and was to assist the tribunal in achieving speedy hearing of the petition.

    The leading counsel to the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate Rauf Aregbesola, Akin Olujinmi, who objected to Izinyon’s application, wondered why the counsel was trying to take a step that was unknown in law.

    Olujimi maintained that Nigeria’s Evidence Act did not provide for tendering of duplicate copies of documents from the bar but could only be tendered through a witness in the witness box.

    Olujinmi’s position was adopted by APC’s leading counsel Rotimi Akeredolu and that of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Ayotunde Ogunleye.

    Justice Ikpejime, therefore, ordered that CTC of documents be tendered from the bar and duplicate copies of documents through the witness box as contained in the report of the pre-trial session.

    Izinyon told the panel that Omisore was ready to tender Form EC. 8A for seven polling units in Otun Balogun Ward of Ayedaade Local Government.

    When it was clear that the documents he sought to tender would need to be vetted by other counsel, he applied that the tribunal should retire for parties to consult.

    The counsel agreed to this position and the tribunal rose at 9.30 am after which Izinyon and his team began the verification and vetting of documents.

    At 10.48 am, the counsel were invited into the judges’ chambers to brief them on their agreed mode of tendering of CTCs of documents.

     

     

  • Member’s illness stalls Osun tribunal sitting

    Member’s illness stalls Osun tribunal sitting

    The Osun State Election Petition Tribunal could not sit yesterday as one of its members fell ill.

    The attorneys were already seated when the court clerk announced that the tribunal would no longer sit as a member of the panel was ill.

    The tribunal, at its last sitting, had fixed yesterday to rule on an application by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its governorship candidate, Senator Iyiola Omisore.

    But the All Progressives Congress (APC) and its candidate, Governor Rauf Aregbesola, argued that the objection must be heard at the pre-hearing stage in accordance with the law.

    Aregbesola’s counsel Akin Olujinmi (SAN) said yesterday that the petition against the August 9 governorship election would not scale through the pre-hearing stage if the preliminary objections were taken.

    He was reacting to the comment of the PDP’s deputy governorship candidate, Adejare Bello, who said his party would go as far as the Supreme Court.

    In an interview with reporters, Bello said it was only the Supreme Court that had the final say on whether or not Aregbesola won the election.

    Olunjinmi said Bello’s comment has shown that the petitioners knew the weakness of their petition.

    He said: “Saying that they want to go to Supreme Court shows that they know the weakness of their case, because I expect them to say at the beginning that they are very sure of their case.

    “That would be decided at the hearing, if we go to hearing, because if the objections are taken, I do not see the petition seeing the light of the day and that is why they are afraid of having the objections taken now.”

  • Some critical post-election questions

    Some critical post-election questions

    Is there a possibility (that) the president sees the militarisation of elections as a worthy contribution to democracy?

    My the time you read this article, incumbent governor of the State of Osun, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, must have seen off the challenge of Senator Iyiola Omisore, the PDP candidate in the just concluded governorship election, on whose behalf the state was unnecessarily put under a stifling security lock- down for the better part of the election week capped by a 24-hour curfew as the icing on the cake. That, of course, would be if the Election Fixing Contractors (EFC) and their rogue INEC collaborators did not have their evil way as they did in Ekiti in what is sure to turn a pyrrhic victory sooner than later. Now that the two governorship elections in the Southwest have come and gone, some questions have become of critical importance if Nigeria must remain a member of the civilised comity of nations.

    The most important of these is why, after he had been in office as president for six years, President Jonathan, and those around him, still think they must fight to the death to get him re-elected. That precisely is what Nigerians have seen in the two elections both of which turned out, uncannily, as predicted by Vice-President Namadi Sambo who said long ago that the two elections would be war.  Some of us had thought then that he was mistaking the Southwest for the Northeast where Nigeria is confronted with its stiffest war situation in over four decades.  What we have seen in Yoruba land these past two months had been nothing short of war. Not only were soldiers and police men deployed in their thousands, it has been observed, because Nigerian soldiers do not go around in hoods, that fake soldiers have equally been sent after Yorubas in whose geo-political zone the two elections took place, wearing some macabre hoods. We equally thought that the PDP lodestar, Buruji Kashamu, was merely grandstanding when , a little before the vice-president’s gaffe, but ominously in a thoroughly coordinated plot, he declared that PDP was out looking for ‘soldiers’ as its governorship candidates in the two states.

    They both must have been acting on orders from above.

    That then leads us to the next question. When on the orders of the president, elections in a democracy are turned to mini wars, shouldn’t  Nigerians safely  assume that he and his party, the PDP, actually intend to rule over a captured  people? Of course, the word capture, which used to be the monopoly of Chief Bode George, a one-time PDP poster boy in the Southwest, has since become democratised and popularised within the top echelons of the party, the latest aficionado being Chief Ishola Filani, the Acting Southwest Deputy Chairman of the party whose own ambition, as he has said severally, is to capture the Southwest for President Jonathan ahead of the 2015 presidential election.

    Is there a possibility (that) the president sees the militarisation of elections as a worthy contribution to democracy? I ask this question because without as much as initiating a single electoral reform in his six years in office, the president was recently quoted as follows while breaking fast with the diplomatic corps and some senators during the last Ramadan: “I know that one thing that is dear to your hearts is what the elections in this country will look like next year. But let me use this unique opportunity to reassure you and I’m conveying this to my brothers, your heads of government, that our elections next year will be free and fair. It will be very peaceful in nature that will even surprise the whole world.”

    Now, the above is a very weighty undertaking  and the fact that he wanted this conveyed to his brother Heads of State makes it doubly so. Given that Nigerians cannot remember anything that the president is doing fundamentally to improve our shambolic elections, unless militarisation could be so regarded, could it be there are things the president knows which Nigerians, even the legislature, haven’t the slightest idea of? It is necessary to read the president between the lines, especially where he says the election “will be very peaceful IN NATURE (caps mine), and will even SURPRISE the whole world.”  In nature, and surprise the world? Dr Reuben Abati must help us out here, and why do I say this? I am one of those who can attest to the fact that the 21 June, 2014 Ekiti governorship election was peaceful IN NATURE; the lines were peaceful, there was no ballot box snatching etc, but many will wager that it was all because the election was scientifically rigged which rendered all the usual PDP rigging tricks unnecessary. Since this columnist, and not a few Nigerians, believe that something far removed from PDP’s  romanticised ‘stomach infrastructure’ accounted for the so-called  defeat of an absolutely performing  Ekiti State  governor, it will be appreciated if the president will get one of his media aides to tell Nigerians on what basis he made that promise to the world. Not to do so is to allow present rumours take a life of their own.

    Finally, it is appropriate to ask whether the president does not think that an election as important as the presidential should be fought strictly on the basis of performance, especially by an incumbent who has, fortuitously, already spent more years than a single term in the post? Nigerians have followed the Babel  of advertisements  by several pro-Jonathan groups which decided to jump the gun even ahead of Mr President  and have observed that not a few of the claims they make for Mr President actually stand the Nigerian reality on the head. There is, for instance, the thoroughly asinine one that says the president has fought terrorism to a standstill. The Boko Haram felons must be laughing! And this is where whoever knows the president will realise that these attention seeking groups are misrepresenting President Jonathan and doing him a great disservice.

    Before the ensemble of Southwest PDP chieftains came to suffocate the president and led him on to several unfortunate routes, Nigerians knew him as neither a General nor a Pharaoh. I wouldn’t know what they think today, but President Jonathan can still prise himself free of these  do-gooders and allow genuine supporters, as distinct from these self-serving Yoruba PDP fellows who were recently appropriately described by former governor Olagunsoye Oyinlola, to run an intellectually grounded campaign on his behalf.

    Without a doubt, most of the problems the president has to deal with today were inherited and many, like terrorism, do not go away easily. But there were things he could have done proactively which he, unfortunately, allowed to fester.  Ensuring, for instance, that those who killed Yusuf, the Boko Haram leader, and some of his supporters were quickly brought to book would have probably stopped this menacing terrorist sect in its tracks. The president also miscalculated in shielding members of his cabinet accused of corruption instead of promptly excusing them from their duty posts to signpost his determination to effectively fight that canker worm. Only this past week, the United States finally put a closure to the Abacha kleptomania ensuring the family lost millions of dollars whereas back home in Nigeria, the president not only ordered that the case against Abacha’s son be discontinued, the fellow is being aggressively romanced by the presidency with an eye to the 2015 elections and may, indeed, emerge the party’s governorship candidate in Kano State.  Rather than allow these  power mongers to hold him captive, especially now that February  2015 is fast approaching, the president would be better served if he, from now on, pursues genuine  electoral  reforms  in which only the police would have any role whatever, squarely, aggressively and, conscientiously confronts corruption and like Obasanjo,  makes public example of  those who currently think they are untouchable and if he goes ahead to negotiate the release of our Chibok girls since a direct military confrontation  is unthinkable  as it would put their lives in jeopardy.

    That way, President Jonathan would be honestly getting ready for an election whose transparency and peaceful nature will truly surprise the world.