Tag: Senator Natasha

  • Immigration seizes Senator Natasha’s passport at airport 

    Immigration seizes Senator Natasha’s passport at airport 

    Immigration Officers at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja have allegedly seized the international passport of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (Kogi Central) for ‘20 minutes.’

    Akpoti-Uduaghan in a live Facebook broadcast on Tuesday morning, said she had planned to take a short break following the celebration of her second year in office but was stopped from travelling when officials withheld her passport.

    “Having completed the celebration of my second year, I decided to take a week off, and my passport is being withheld again. The same thing happened before,” she said.

    The Senator insisted that she had committed no offence and that there was no court order authorising the seizure of her travel document.

    Read Also: Charges against Senator Natasha not abuse of court process – AGF

    She alleged that during a similar incident in the past, an airport official disclosed that the instruction to withhold her passport came from the Senate President.

    In the video, Akpoti-Uduaghan claimed she had stood for 20 minutes without her passport being returned to her.

    An immigration official was seen handing over the passport to Akpoti-Uduaghan in the video.

    As of press time, neither the Nigeria Immigration Service nor the Office of the Senate President had commented on the allegation.

  • Charges against Senator Natasha not abuse of court process – AGF

    Charges against Senator Natasha not abuse of court process – AGF

    The office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice has faulted claim by Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan that the charges filed against before the HIgh Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) and the Federal High Court in Abuja amounted to an abuse of court process.

    The AGF’s office said the charges were duly filed upon comprehensive and conclusive investigations and having established a prima facie case against her.

    The office of the AGF, in a counter affidavit, also faulted the Senator’s claim that her petitions were not investigated.

    The counter-affidavit was filed in reaction to a notice of preliminary objection filed by Natasha in opposition to both charges. 

    She is charged with criminal defamation before the HIgh Court of the FCT, while a charge of alleged cybercrime is pending against her before the Federal High Court in relation to her claim that Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio and ex-governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello planed to kill her.

    In the counter affidavit, the prosecution stated that contrary to her claim, the three-count charge before the HIgh Court of the FCT was filed against her “after a thorough Investigation of the case and a prima facie case was established.  

    “The three-count charge was preferred against the defendant pursuant to the Penal code Law of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and in the bonafide exercise of the prosecutorial powers of the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation guaranteed under the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999(as amended) and in the best interest of justice. 

    “The actions and conducts of the defendant/applicant (Natasha) contravened the penal code law of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. 

    “The criminal charge against the defendant is borne out of the comprehensive and conclusive investigation of the case, including all petitions and parties related to the case by the Nigerian Police Force. 

    “All the petitions filed by the defendant were duly investigated and charges filed at the FCT High Court against her colleague senator. 

    “The Office of the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation filed the criminal charge against the defendant after due regard to the public interest, the interest of justice and the need to prevent abuse of legal process. 

    “The charge against the defendant is consistent with the extant laws and does not constitute an abuse of the legal and prosecutorial powers of the Office of the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation,” the prosecution said.

    When the case came up on Monday before the HIgh Court of the FCT, the prosecuting lawyer, David Kaswe said although the case was slated for the hearing of the defendant ‘s preliminary objection, the prosecution filed a counter affidavit, which it was unable to serve on the defendant.

    Read Also: Alleged cybercrime: Court adjourns Senator Natasha’s trial till November 24

    Kaswe prayed the courtfor a short adjournment to enable the prosecution properly serve the defendant with its response to her preliminary objection.

    He said: “It will not be fair for the prosecution to insist that the matter goes on as the defence team has indicated that it will respond to our counter affidavit.

    “In the circumstance, we are asking for a short adjournment to enable us (prosecution) to effect proper service on the defence.”

    Responding, Natasha’s lawyer, Ehiogie West-Idahosa (SAN) confirmed that the defendant was not served with the prosecution’s counter affidavit.

    West-Idahosa said his client would respond once she is properly served and prayed the court for a long adjournment on the grounds that members of the defendant’s legal team plan to attend this year’s Internation Bar Association’s meeting in Canada.

     Justice Chizoba Oji adjourned till December 1 for the preliminary objection and the counter affidavit.

  • Alleged cybercrime: Court adjourns Senator Natasha’s trial till November 24

    Alleged cybercrime: Court adjourns Senator Natasha’s trial till November 24

    A Federal High Court (FHC) in Abuja has adjourned further hearing in the trial of Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan on alleged cybercrime offences to November 24.

    The hearing earlier scheduled for October 20 could not hold on Monday owing to the protest by some individuals calling for the release of the detained self acclaimed leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.

    The protest disrupted normal activities in some parts of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) on Monday, preventing most people from accessing their offices and work places.

    An enquiry at the court on Tuesday revealed that the trial judge, Justice Mohammed Umar has rescheduled further hearing in the case till November 24.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan is being prosecuted on a six-count charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025 brought under the Cybercrimes Prohibition, Prevention, etc (Amendment) Act 2024.

    She is, among others, alleged to have  transmitted false and injurious information via electronic means with the intention to malign, incite, and endanger lives and breach public order.

    Read Also: Suspected Ansaru leaders Usman, Abba’s terrorism trial postponed till November 19 ‎

    Among the particulars of the charge are claims that Akpoti-Uduaghan, while addressing a gathering on April 4th 2025 in Ihima, Kogi State alleged that the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio instructed ex-governor Yahaya Bello to have her killed in Kogi State. 

    She was also alleged to have, in a television interview, repeated similar claims, to the effect that the Senate President and Bello plotted to kill her in Kogi State.

    At the last hearing on September 22 the prosecution’s plan to open its case by calling witnesses was stalled owing to a notice of preliminary objection filed by the defence.

    Defence lawyers, Ehiogie West-Idahosa (SAN) told the court that his client filed a notice of preliminary objection to challenge the court’s jurisdiction to hear the case.

    West-Idahosa said the objection is not to the nature of the charge, but the alleged abuse of the prosecutorial powers of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF).

    The defence lawyer also complained about not being served with copies of the statements of the prosecution witnesses.

    Lawyer to the prosecution l, David Kaswe argued strenuously that the objection filed by the defendant should not be allowed to stall the court’s business for the day.

    But, Justice Mohammed Umar, who noted that the prosecution was yet to respond to the defendant’s preliminary objection, insisted that the prosecution must first respond to the objection.

    Justice Umar expressed his willingness to first, determine the objection raised by the defence before taking any further steps in the case.

    He adjourned till October 20 for the hearing of the objection, which was aborted by the protest.

  • Afenifere urges probe into Senator Natasha’s allegations against Akpabio 

    Afenifere urges probe into Senator Natasha’s allegations against Akpabio 

    Prominent Yoruba socio-political group, Afenifere, has called on the Nigerian Senate and the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) to determine whether Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan made false claims against Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

    While commending the Senate’s decision to lift Akpoti-Uduaghan’s six-month suspension, Afenifere stressed that her allegations of sexual harassment must not be dismissed without judicial scrutiny.

    In a statement on Thursday, the group’s National Organising Secretary, Kole Omololu, said the recall reinforced adherence to the rule of law but insisted that the gravity of the allegations required thorough investigation by relevant security agencies, both locally and internationally.

    Read Also: Eyes on Remo Stars as Nigeria’s quartet  brace for continental cups

    The group further recalled Akpoti-Uduaghan’s past case involving false sexual harassment claims against former presidential aide Reno Omokri, for which damages were awarded in an out-of-court settlement.

    Afenifere criticised the senator’s decision to take her claims to international media outlets such as BBC, CNN, Sky News, and Deutsche Welle, saying it cast Nigeria in a negative light. 

    It also raised questions about her participation in an Inter-Parliamentary Union session in New York, noting that attendance at such meetings is strictly by nomination.

    “If Natasha truly participated in the IPU meeting without due nomination, then it simply revealed her manipulation of our public institutions for pecuniary ends,” the group said.

  • N’Assembly unseals Senator Natasha’s office

    N’Assembly unseals Senator Natasha’s office

    • Senator vows not to apologise, says suspension fraudulent
    • Court to hear case Oct. 27

    Embattled Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan was yesterday granted access into her office at the National Assembly premises, six months and two weeks after her suspension from the Senate.

    She moved into the office located at Suite 2.05 of the Senate Wing after it was unsealed by a Sergeant-At-Arms earlier in the day.

    Sealing of her office was part of the decision of the Senate when she was suspended on March 6 during plenary.

    Mrs. Akpoti-Uduaghan insisted that she would never apologise for her actions as demanded by the Senate and ordered by the court.

    The senator was accompanied by her supporters, who were barred from accessing the complex.

    However, the supporters later converged on the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Abuja, where hearing was to resume in the case instituted against  her by Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

    On 22 July,  the Kogi Central senator had attempted to gain access into the National Assembly premises, but she was prevented by security operatives.

    Although she informed the Senate about her readiness to return to the chambers after the six months lapsed, the Clerk of the National Assembly clarified that she cannot resume because the case she instituted has not been disposed of by the court.

    After she gained entrance into the premises yesterday, the police fired tear gas to disperse her supporters who attempted to move into the premises.

    Mrs. Akpoti-Uduaghan told reporters that there was a plot to compel her to apologise as a condition for lifting the ban on her on  October 7.

    But she vowed never to do so, saying that she would not apologise for injustice.

    Read Also: Emefiele urges court to foreclose prosecution in alleged procurement fraud trial

    Akpoti-Uduaghan said: “I’m going to be quite limited with what I will say but in weeks to come, I will have much to say.

    “The only thing I would like to comment on is a sentence I read on the papers today, like I did mention. I have not been officially communicated about the unsealing of my office.

    “The last communication I received from the Clerk of the National Assembly was that I will not be allowed to resume because the matter was still pending at the Appeal Court.

    “So, I am still awaiting the letter because it’s very important to understand the conditions that they might set illegally concerning the opening of my office because like I said, I read in the papers, I think it’s Vanguard to be specific, that a leadership meeting was held yesterday and the Minority Leader, Senator Abba Moro, upon resumption on the 7th of October would raise a motion calling on me to apologise.

    “So, I am actually worried as to what apology they expect from me. I can’t apologise for an injustice.”

    She added: “May I remind the good people of Nigeria that the document that led to my illegal suspension, which is the recommendation which Senator Neda Imasuen read, was actually written by the Office of the Senate President and the signatures that endorsed the recommendation were not willful signatures.

    “There was only a sheet that was attached and that means that the entire document that pronounced my suspension was tainted with fraud.

    “So, this is just one illegality upon the other and I think in Nigeria, we should reject such things. I think it’s actually appalling that such amount of illegality and fraud can occur in the National Assembly.

    “So, if they are expecting me to apologise, I am sorry I don’t have these words and if that is the condition for opening this office, then, I think we have a long dance to make.

    “I know how much we have had to face and survive in the past six months and most of it that we survived happened in the full glare of Nigerians.

    “From the unjust suspension to the recall. We survived the recall, we survived the blockage of roads and waterways into Kogi that we had to fly in through using the helicopter. We survived the blackmail from the so-called crazy lady on Facebook.

    “It’s amazing what we had to survive. To God Almighty be the glory and my deepest appreciation goes to the good people of Kogi Central,  Kogi State and Nigeria at large.

    “My husband, my love, I want to  say this: I love you dearly and I pray all men should support their wives as much as you have supported me and my children.  Thank you for your sacrifices.

    “So, in everything, it just shows that sometimes, it’s good to put the institutions to test. We can’t bow down in the face of injustice.

    “No one is more Nigerian than us. Senator Akpabio is not more of a senator than I am. He’s not a governor of this place and he treated me as if I was his servant or a domestic staff in his house.

    “It’s very unfortunate that at this time after so many years of democracy, we would have a National Assembly being run by such dictatorship. It’s totally unacceptable.

    “As for me, I’m glad to be here and even though we had been illegally suspended, no day have I hesitated in effectively carrying out my duties as a senator representing Kogi Central to the very best of my capacity.

    “Not one day went by without me looking out for opportunities, either in terms of bringing infrastructure or projects to my people and even jobs wherever I could because I didn’t want them to suffer the neglect and the vacuum that was created by this injustice.

    Atiku: reason has prevailed

    Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who reacted to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s resumption on Twitter, said reason has prevailed.

    He said in a statement that   the voice of reason has prevailed at last with the unsealing of the office.  Atiku said although the period Kogi Central was denied of representation in the Senate can never be reclaimed, her struggle has not been in vain.

    Atiku said: “It has proven, once again, that when we stand together, we can triumph over tyranny.”

    Court reschedules Senator Natasha’s trial for October 27

    A High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in Maitama has postponed the senator’s trial till October 27.

    Mrs. Akpoti-Uduaghan was arraigned before the court on June 19 on a three-count charge.

    She was accused of defamation and harmful imputation in relation to her statements against the Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello.

    On her arraignment, she pleaded not guilty, following which Justice Chisoba Oji granted her bail in the sum of N50million and a surety in like sum.

    The case was adjourned till September 23 for the commencement of trial.

    However, at the mention of the case yesterday, the prosecution lawyer, David Kaswe informed the court about the prosecution’s readiness for the commencement of trial.

    Kaswe said the prosecution was ready to open its case, adding that its first witness, a Superintendent of Police, Abdulhafeez Garba, was in court for that purpose.

    However, when he sought the court’s permission to invite the witness to the witness box, defence lawyer, Ehiogie West-Idahosa (SAN), objected on the grounds that his client had filed a motion challenging the competence of the charge and the court’s jurisdiction.

    Kaswe, an official of the Federal Ministry of Justice, told the court that he was not personally served with the motion, which the defence claimed to have served on the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF).

    At that point, Justice Oji scanned through the case file and confirmed that the prosecution was served through the Office of the AGF.

    The judge subsequently directed the prosecution to respond to the application, which she elected to determine before taking any further steps in the case and adjourned till October 27 for hearing.

    Natasha is, in count one of the charge, accused of making harmful imputation which she knew would harm the reputation of Akpabio, by claiming he plotted with Yahaya Bello, to kill her.

    In count two, Akpoti-Uduaghan is accused of making a similar harmful imputation, knowing that it will harm the reputation of Yahaya Bello.

    She is, in count three, accused of making another imputation, which she knew would harm the reputation of Akpabio by associating him with the death of one Miss Imoren Iniubong.

  • Alleged cybercrime: Senator Natasha’s planned trial stalled

    Alleged cybercrime: Senator Natasha’s planned trial stalled

    The planned commencement of trial in the cybercrime charge brought against suspended Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan before a Federal High Court in Abuja was stalled on Monday owing to an objection raised by the defendant.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan was arraigned on June 30 on a six-count charge filed by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mohammed Abubakar and granted bail, following which Justice Mohammed Umar adjourned till September 22 for the commencement of trial.

    When the case was called on Monday, prosecuting lawyer, David Kaswe told the court that the business of the day was for the prosecution to open its case by calling its first witness.

    Kaswe, who had a television screen mounted in the courtroom preparatory to the commencement of proceedings, told the court that the prosecution has a witness in court and was ready to proceed.

    Responding, defence lawyers, Ehiogie West-Idahosa (SAN) expressed concern about the possibility of the prosecution opening its case.

    West-Idahosa said his client has filed a notice of preliminary objection to challenge the court’s jurisdiction to hear the case.

    He said the objection is not to the nature of the charge, but the alleged abuse of the prosecutorial powers of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF).

    The defence lawyer also complained about not being served with copies of the statements of the prosecution witnesses.

    Although Kaswe argued strenuously that the objection filed by the defendant should not be allowed to stall the court’s business for the day, Justice Umar insisted that the prosecution must first respond to the objection.

    The judge said he intends to first, determine the objection raised by the defence before taking any further steps in the case.

    He adjourned till October 20 for the hearing of the objection.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan is, in the charge, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025 brought under the Cybercrimes Prohibition, Prevention, etc (Amendment) Act 2024 alleged to have transmitted false and injurious information via electronic means with the intention to malign, incite, and endanger lives and breach public order.

    Among the particulars of the charge are claims that Akpoti-Uduaghan, while addressing a gathering on April 4th 2025 in Ihima, Kogi State alleged that the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio instructed ex-governor Yahaya Bello to have her killed in Kogi State. 

    She was also alleged to have, in a television interview, repeated similar claims, to the effect that the Senate President and Bello plotted to kill her in Kogi State.

    Read Also: Why Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan cannot resume at the Senate yet

    Some counts in the charge read

    *That on or about the 1st day of April 2025, while addressing a crowd of people at Ihima Community, Kogi State, you — Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan — intentionally caused the following communication to be transmitted via a computer system and network, to wit: ‘…and Akpabio told Yahaya Bello, I am saying, standing by what I have said. He told him that he should make sure that killing me does not happen in Abuja, it should be done here, so it will seem as if it is the people that killed me here…’ And you, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan knew this contained a threat that could harm the reputation of Senator Godswill Obot Akpabio, GCON, as the President of the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. You thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 24 (2) (c) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024 and punishable under the same Act.”

    *That on or about the 1st day of April 2025, while addressing a crowd of people at Ihima Community, Kogi State, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, you — Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan — intentionally caused the following communication to be transmitted via a computer system and network, to wit: ‘…and Akpabio told Yahaya Bello, I am saying, standing by what I have said. He told him that he should make sure that killing me does not happen in Abuja, it should be done here, so it will seem as if it is the people that killed me here…’ And you, Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, knew this contained a threat that could harm the reputation of Yahaya Adoza Bello, a former Governor of Kogi State. You thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 24 (2) (c) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) (Amendment) Act, 2024 and punishable under the same section of the Act.”

  • BREAKING: Suspended Senator Natasha arrives NASS complex

    BREAKING: Suspended Senator Natasha arrives NASS complex

    Suspended Senator Natasha (Kogi Central) has arrived the National Assembly complex in the company of supporters.

    READ ALSO: Tunde Onakoya playfully woos Genevieve Nnaji as netizens react

    The National Assembly complex and surroundings were taken over by security operatives in the early hours of Tuesday over Natasha’s plan to resume despite the Senate yet to lift her suspension. 

    The suspended senator has however arrived, trekking to the complex with supporters. 

    Details Shortly….

  • Senator Natasha docked on cybercrime charges

    Senator Natasha docked on cybercrime charges

    Suspended Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan was on Monday arraigned before a Federal High Court in Abuja on cybercrime charges.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan was arraigned on a six-count charge filed by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation (DPPF), Mohammed Abubakar.

    She is, in the charge, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025 brought under the Cybercrimes Prohibition, Prevention, etc (Amendment) Act 2024 alleged to have  transmitted false and injurious information via electronic means with the intention to malign, incite, and endanger lives and breach public order.

    Among the particulars of the charge are claims that Akpoti-Uduaghan, while addressing a gathering on April 4th 2025 in Ihima, Kogi State alleged that the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio instructed ex-governor Yahaya Bello to have her killed in Kogi State. 

    She was also alleged to have, in a television interview, repeated similar claims, to the effect that the Senate President and the former Governor of Kogi State plotted to kill her in her state.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan pleaded not guilty when the charge was read to her on Monday by an official of the court.

    Following her plea of not guilty, prosecuting lawyer, Mohammed Abubakar (the DPPF) sought a date for the commencement of trial.

    Defence lawyer, Rowland Otaru (SAN) informed the court that a motion for bail had been filed for his client.

    He sought the court’s permission to move the application, which Abubakar did not object.

    Abubakar said he did not file any counter affidavit, but urged the court to grant bail on condition that will secure the defendant’s attendance of further proceedings.

    Ruling, Justice  Mohammed Umar noted that the defendant is a serving Senator and proceeded to grant her bail on self recognisance.

    Justice Umar then adjourned till September 22 for the commencement of trial.

    This is the second time the Senator would be arraigned within two weeks.

    She was arraigned on June 19 on a three-count defamation charge before Justice Chizoba Oji of the HIgh Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja.

    Read Also: Why Senator Natasha should have her day in court

    She pleaded not guilty to the charge marked: CR/297/25 and was granted bail at N50million and one reasonable surety in the like sum. 

    The judge ordered that the surety must own a landed property within the jurisdiction of the court. 

    Justice Oji adjourned till September 23 for the commencement of trial.

    Akpoti-Uduaghan is, in count one of the charge, accused of making harmful imputation which she knew would harm the reputation of the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, by claiming he plotted, with former Kogi governor, Yahaya Bello, to kill her.

    In count two, Akpoti-Uduaghan is accused of making a similar harmful imputation knowing that it will harm the reputation of ex-governor Yahaya Bello.

    She is, in count three, accused of making another imputation, which she knew would harm the reputation of Akpabio by associating him with the death of one Miss Imoren Iniubong.

  • Alleged murder plot: Senator Natasha’s planned arraignment stalled

    Alleged murder plot: Senator Natasha’s planned arraignment stalled

    …court declines to issue arrest warrant

    The scheduled arraignment of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan on a charge bordering on cybercrimes was stalled on Monday owing to the prosecution’s inability to serve the charge on her personally as required.

    In the six-count marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025 pending before the Federal High Court, Abuja, the Senator is alleged to have caused to be transmitted, via a computer system and network, false information which constitutes a threat to the reputation of the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio and a former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello.

    The Senator was said to have, while addressing a crowd on April 1 in Ihima community in Kogi State, intentionally caused, via a computer system and network, a false claim that Akpabio told Bello to have her killed in Kogi State.

    She is also accused of making false claims, to cause the breakdown of law and order, by allegedly claiming, during her appearance on a television programme, that Akpabio and Bello were plotting to eliminate her.

    The alleged offences, according to the prosecution, are contrary to and punishable under sections 24(1)(b) and 24(2)(c) of the Cybercrimes Prohibition, Prevention, etc (Amendment) Act 2024.

    At the mention of the case on Monday, the lawyer for the prosecution, David Kaswe (from the Federal Ministry of Justice) said the business of the day was arraignment.

    Kaswe, who noted that the defendant was not in court, said he had earlier served the charge on the defendant’s lawyer, implying that she (defendant) was well aware that the case would come up on Monday.

    He then prayed the court to issue a bench warrant against the defendant for allegedly failing to appear in court in spite of being aware of the charge against her.

    Kaswe said, “It was this morning that we were able to serve the defendant through her counsel, but the defendant is not in court.

    “So, it means the defendant is aware of this matter, but decided not to appear in court.

    Read Also: I’ll make sure 2baba’s light never dims – Natasha Osawaru

    “In the light of this, I apply that a bench warrant be issued against her for her failure to attend court to take her plea in this criminal charge,” he said.

    Lawyer to the defendant, Johnson Usman (SAN) described Kaswe’s application as strange and discourteous.

    Usman said that on learning about the case, he called the prosecutor to let him know that his client had instructed him to receive the charge on her behalf.

    He added, “I was served the charge at 9:15 this morning here in court. So, how will the defendant know that the matter is coming up when she has not seen the charge?

    “I find the application strange, and it should be discouraged. If the defendant has not been served, she cannot be in court,” Usman said.

    At that point, Justice Musa Umar intervened and asked Kaswe if he had served the charge on the defendant, to which the prosecuting attorney said he was yet to effect service on the defendant.

    Justice Umar then noted that it was impossible, in view of the non-service of the charge on the defendant, for the court to issue a bench warrant sought by the prosecution.

    The judge granted the request by the prosecution for leave to serve the charge on the defendant through her lawyer.

    He adjourned till June 30 for arraignment.

  • FG sues Senator Natasha over alleged defamation

    FG sues Senator Natasha over alleged defamation

    The federal government has filed a lawsuit against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central, over comments she allegedly made during a live television broadcast.

    The suit, marked CR/297/25, was filed before a Federal Capital Territory High Court on May 16, 2025, with Akpoti-Uduaghan listed as the sole defendant.

    According to the charge, the government accuses the senator of “making imputation knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm the reputation of a person,” in reference to Section 391 of the Penal Code, Cap 89, Laws of the Federation, 1990. The alleged offence is said to be punishable under Section 392 of the same legal framework.

    Read Also: Akpabio petitions IGP over assassination allegation by Senator Natasha

    As contained in the charge sheet, the Federal Republic of Nigeria is named as the complainant, with Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as the sole defendant in the matter.

    Details shortly…