Tag: senatorial

  • Senatorial candidate denies withdrawal from contest

    The Senatorial Candidate of the Action Peoples Party (APP) in Osun Central Senatorial District, Adebisi Mukaila Micheal, has denied making any move or arrangement to withdraw his ambition for any other candidate, saying his ambition is still on course.

    This denouncement, according to him, was necessary based on the information being circulated by some leaders of the party that he had withdrawn his ambition and supported the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) senatorial candidate, Gani Ola-Oluwa and the party’s Presidential Candidate, Atiku Abubakar.

    Noting that he has never been approached or entered into any alliance with anyone, either from the PDP or All Progressives Congress (APC), he expressed the belief in his capacity and that of his supporters, to mobilize people of his senatorial district towards winning the election, which would in turn culminate in freedom for the people.

    According to him, those who had visited the PDP candidate to sell the dummy of his withdrawal, have done so without carrying him along.

    He cautioned the two party chieftains to rather face their ambition in their districts rather than negotiating on his behalf in Osun Central without his consent.

    “I assure my supporters that our ambition is still on course and any move to the contrary by any group or individual is self-serving, baseless, mischievous and should not be accorded any value whatsoever.”

  • Senatorial candidate seeks service to humanity

    The senatorial candidate of the Action Peoples Party (APP) in Osun Central Senatorial District, Prophet Adebisi Mukaila Micheal, has said the current legislators are short-changing Nigerians.

    Michael stated this while addressing his supporters in Osogbo, the state capital.

    The cleric-turned politician said his intention to run for the senatorial seat was borne out of his desire to save the people from underdevelopment in the country.

    The clergyman-turned-politician said the expectation of the people when electing their representatives was to see dividends of democracy in their environment.

    He expressed worry that the hopes of the people had been dashed by those in the position of authority.

    Adebisi, who hails from Iragbiji in Boripe Local Government Area, said his desire to join politics was to ensure that people feel the impact of government in Osun Central to the suffering they are currently experiencing.

  • Contestants want Kogi West APC Senatorial contest annulled

    Three of the aspirants who contested and lost the Kogi West Senatorial district primary have asked the National Working Committee of the party to declare null and void the outcome of the primary which produced former NUJ President, Smart Adeyemi as the party candidate.
    They alleged that the primary was not conducted in accordance with the constitution and the guidelines set by the party, adding that the entire process was manipulated by agents of the state government whose continued stay in office was tied to the outcome of the exercise.
    In a joint petition signed by the the three aspirants namely Dr. Williams Akanle, a retired Director of the Department of State Services, Chief Mrs Doyin Ibikunle and Alhaji Tajudeen Bismillah, they asked the party to follow the part of honour and save the current democracy from collapse.
    They said it was unfortunate that the APC has become a.home to those they describe as despots who proclaim decorum and integrity while in reality they are despicable, alleging that what was done in n the Senatorial zone was mere vote allocation that “was perfected during the five hours window between the actual time the committee arrived Kabba and the time the committee surfaced to conduct the primary.
    According to them, the ideals of the APC are based on equity and integrity which all true members of the party ought to uphold, saying “we seek the intervention of the National leadership of our great party on this issue”.
    They want the national secretariat to order a fresh primary and disband the panel sent to conduct the exercise in the state, while also banning the the state government from and its officials from actively getting involved in the conduct.
    They said the primary was supervised by official of the state government led by the Speaker of the state House of Assembly, Prince Matthew Kolawole, stressing that they actually came with the mindset of throwing up a candidate anointed by the state government.
  • Senatorial perdition

    That coup-is-still-possible quip, by Ike Ekweremadu, deputy Senate president (DSP), echoes one Yoruba saying: ”Omo yo tan, o npe baba re l’eranko!

    A brat, at the apex of his filial hubris, dismisses his doting parents as idiots!  Surely, such surfeit munificence is nothing but supreme parental folly?

    That fairly epitomizes this 8th Senate — indeed, the two chambers of the National Assembly.  After gorging silly, from the ceaseless milk of the civil order, the prodigal, in cloud seven, now dreams military rule!

    That about captures Ekweremadu’s gaffe.

    Yet, there may be something spiritual about it all.  To start with, Ekweremadu’s subsistence as DSP has nothing to do with  the so-called “beauty of democracy”.  Instead, it is the very ugly gargoyle of opportunism.

    Bukola Saraki, desperate to sell his All Progressives Congress (APC) parliamentary mandate, to at all cost become Senate president, was clear-eyed about his perfidy.  Even then, he needed a devil-may-care collaborator-opportunist.

    Enter, Ike Ekweremadu, last-term legit DSP under David Mark but now willy-nilly DSP, procured by the rotten fruits of stolen goods!  For where else does a minority party in parliament land the DSP?

    One that scrambles to high office, by absolute dishonour, is spiritually fated to fatal mis-jives!

    Still on honour, take a close look at the two captains of the executive: President Muhammadu Buhari and Vice President Yemi Osinbajo; and the National Assembly equivalent captains: Senate President Bukola Saraki and Speaker Yakubu Dogara.

    In each bloc, one is Muslim, the other Christian.  Yet, each  group throws up diametrically opposed vibes — why?  Personal conducts.

    Call Buhari many names over, but that he is a thief, to gobble public money, is never going to wash.  Tried and tested many times, his squeaky clean image and Spartan ways have held steady, in the midst of so much decadence among his contemporaries.

    Vice President Osinbajo is rich — but not in money (still, by any standard, he’s no pauper) but in value.

    Every dime he has earned — and that’s a good many — is from his sweat as a Law professor and active legal practitioner.  In Lagos, his first port as a public servant, he left a trail of punishing devotion and high record of excellence.  His sterling legal reforms, as Lagos attorney-general and Justice commissioner (1999-2007), now being adopted at the federal level and by other states, are living testimonies.

    No wonder, the presidential duo strike the image of the straight-and-narrow, that elixir a decadent Nigeria needs to scale these trying times.

    That contemporary Nigeria deliberately underplays these stellar traits shows how too far gone, from that narrow path to salvation, the Nigerian elite — particularly the so-called (wo)men of God — may have strayed.

    But the National Assembly?  The direct contrast: glum, free-for-all, celebrated decadence.

    Saraki, the Senate president, has no conviction record.  But his politics stinks to seven heavens.  The soulless manner he sold his party’s birthright to DSP for personal profit, cutting the dishonourable PDP and its Ekweremadu a sickly slack, is brazen proof.

    Long after the spoil of office is long putrefied in the belly, that treachery and twin opportunism would define the political profile of both.

    And long after this 8th Senate is gone, its effete succumb to such perfidy would question its group essence, despite the presence, in the conclave, of a few well and truly decent (wo)men.

    House Speaker Dogara appears placid on the surface.  But with his reaction to “budget padding” allegations by Abdulmnmini Jibril, former chair of the House Appropriation Committee now languishing in suspension exile, he would appear as ruthless as they come.

    Both the Senate and the House are unrepentantly yoked to turning their so-called house rules into some big whip, to thrash the Constitution on citizens’ rights.  But can a conclave, by its rule, banish a member for a long spell, when that member, by law, represents a constituency?

    Which one is supreme — the parliament’s right to maintaining discipline among its own ranks; or the Constitution’s diktat that every citizen must have representation?

    That is one issue the courts should thrash out, for that core representation makes Parliament the first estate of the realm.

    Yet, this 8th National Assembly has exalted group norm over the grund norm.  Because that often negates its very essence, the result is perceived impunity inside its high walls.  That translates into crass opacity, to citizens outside, who have a right to know.

    Of course, such opacity breeds explosive scandals, the latest of which is Senator Shehu Sani’s sensational claim that every senator pockets N13.5 million a month, aside from other perks, in holy gravy!

    A stunned Senate might just dispatch Sani to Golgotha, for infringing on its “privileges, integrity and rights”.  No tears for Holy Shehu, Glorious and Conceited, who immaculately talks down on everyone!  Still, that would be barring the gate when the stallion had galloped clear!

    Indeed, unfazed institutional opacity breeds the many Senate escapades.

    First, it tailors public laws to its private benefits, simply because it’s charged with that chore.

    Then, it instals itself as the decadent alternative to the President’s war against corruption, with its running battles with EFCC’s Ibrahim Magu and Nigeria Customs’ Hameed Ali, two citizens, like Buhari, virtually killing themselves to deliver a better Nigeria.

    With the executive calling its bluff on Magu, the Senate throws tantrums, decreeing itself AWOL from crucial confirmation duties.  Yet, this is a job it pays itself at an obscene premium!

    The other day, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was even appealing to the Nigerian Senate to confirm some crucial Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) nominees!  A thoroughly deluded Senate dubs it “protest”.  But its political masters, we the people, call it  unpardonable subversion that must be punished.

    Besides, it’s March and this 8th National Assembly is still playing yo-yo with the 2018 budget.  Is there loading a repeat of last year, when it switched votes from crucial roads nationwide, that would have given the economy a fillip, to useless constituency projects, for brazen personal egos?

    Indeed, an opaque parliament is a blight on any democracy.  No wonder, in its arrogance turned hubris, this National Assembly has installed itself champion of anything decadent; and virulent opposer of everything diligent.  Sad!

    It is from such free-for-all decadence that an Ekweremadu would practically call for military rule, in the very hallowed chambers of the Senate!  Any further proof of how  these characters have re-shaped the house in their hollow images?

    Still, Ekweremadu is only a son, out of the too many children of perdition, plaguing the Nigerian Senate.

    They are all beyond redemption.  That is why, come 2019, they must all be swept clean, into political Siberia.

  • Why I rejected APC senatorial ticket, by Ilaka

    Why I rejected APC senatorial ticket, by Ilaka

    Oyebisi Ilaka, Ladilu of Oyo, is a chieftain of the Accord Party (AP) in Oyo State. He spoke with EMMANUEL OLADESU on partisan issues.

    What is your assessment of the Ajimobi administration in the last six years?

    There are two things; we have a very intellectually ineffective and a very lazy government. You are not opening new roads, Oyo state is such a massive place, if you travel wide in the state. All what we have is theft; we have an unseen situation whereby the civil servants are not paid. One point in time the governor talks about restructuring the education sector, it wasn’t particularly such a bad idea, but as usual, it was not done properly. Because he should have met with the original stakeholders before going public with the plan. You need to see the decay that is in education in the state.

    They should have said, first and foremost you have to sit down and ask yourself, what kind of education system do I want? cost it. what other stakeholders can I bring into play to assist in achieving this; it is now a collective dream or agenda.

    It is actually disgusting that Oyo State come around 29th position in school certificate and NECO. Outside Lagos State and the proprietors of private’s schools in Oyo state; if you take them out, we would be like the 36th. Oyo State is supposed to be the education Mecca of this country. When they talk about agriculture, it is a lip service. Even if they say they are the disciples of Awolowo and they believe in rural development, integrated development of rural areas, what have they done?

    Why you do not see too much revolts in Oyo State is because food is cheaper  because you have rural roads that was put in place by Awolowo and successive governments.

    People begging for money in Oyo state, half of the time, they want to use it for another thing, not to eat because a lot of them know where they can go and ask for garri and they would give it to them. We need a government where everybody can work together; I think that that would end the administrations that has failed the people.

    What do you thing about political alliances that are coming up?

    Everybody has the right to say he want to become even the president of Nigeria, but you know when the time comes, people would begin to make more realistic decisions.

    Let’s remove the individuals and look at the general structure. If you want to see where a party is, then you have to go to the House of Assembly. then, you know whether the party is there or not there. In the Oyo State House of Assembly, APC has the majority, followed by Accord, then Labour; there is no body from PDP and SDP, that is the composition and this are the people representing the 33 local governments of the state.

    But, we also know that our politics is aggressive. The APC is in government now and other parties would want to unseat them. you can’t divorce what is happening on the local scene from what is impacting in the national scene.

    Someone says all the major parties would break up and reform. The APC has the tension that cannot be resolved. In the candidates that come out from Oyo state, for example, if you look at them, and you screen them; when you look at them in different terms, there are people who believe in the power of Abuja to resolve certain things for them and they are those who believe in going to Agodi thinking that things would be resolved for them; and there some people who are hoping that if it just scattered they would be able to grab something.

    On the other side of the equation, the largest people of the PDP belongs to the Makarfi group, those who belongs to the Sheriff group would not openly agree that they belong to the Sheriff group; they would tell you that ‘I belong to one PDP’ and we know what that language means. It is only the Makarfi group that would tell you they belong to Makarfi even in the Oyo state and what we know is that that group is speaking for all other party to form their own grand alliance.

    So, what is on ground now is that there are parties that would be used as a platform; Accord is one of them, SDP, APGA; but the smart would either use the Accord or the SDP; they would be used as new platforms for the opposition.

    But, the opposition would surely get together and there no state that would be the best to do that than Oyo state.

    Ajimobi runs a minority government because he was voted in by 32 per cent of the people. That is why he doesn’t think about the other 68 per cent. The 68 per cent didn’t vote for him. so you have the dictatorship of the minority. the majority would surely rise.

    I am part of a movement whereby we were talking to ourselves across political parties on the basis that lets forget our party differences; most of us all came from PDP at one time or the other because of different purposes and whatever. So we have to appreciate the fact that unless we operate collectively; there are meetings on different levels to make sure that group come together. I am a realist when it comes to politics, I know that we would not score 100% in bringing everybody together but as long as we score 60 to 70 percent then we have tried.

    Why did you reject the APC senatorial ticket?

    I left the PDP for a particular reason. the reason I left was because there were issues with the governor then (Akala) and I was part of the fall out; at that point in time, if I want to contest, would Akala allow me to have a plain ground to contest? the answer is no. That was the twilight of his administration and I went into the ACN. I found out that they don’t really believe in primaries and democracy like that; I was misled by the leadership, particularly even in Oyo state whereby when the chips were down, they were removed and I left them from where they were. And I say it without any fear of contradiction that Senator Rashidi Adewolu is the only political person in Oyo state, I can line up behind because his politics has been consistent. And because he also has intellectual capacity I have seen his vision, I have shared his vision.

    But, the issue of if he would contest for governorship or not in 2019,  I think that decision is left for him, it is his own personal decision. He has a role of leadership to play, not just in Oyo state, but also in the national politics and the politics of southwest.

    What is you aspiration in the next dispensation?

    My view is that I have a settled intension to contest. what for? I do not know. What is important is that let’s do the work, what vehicle would take us to where we want to go. We have to stay strategically, you have to have plan and implement the strategy. That is what is more important now, not who is going for governor, senate or what have you. My problem now is how do I get together with my brothers and sisters of the other side of the divide and we are sure because we are speaking to them as well. People who are within the APC are yarning for us to get it right at the other side of the equation.

    Before the last election, there was agitation to reform the party; we chose a new chairman and party officers from ward level to the state level. Some people had an agenda to hijack the party, but it did not work. Then, we had a ruling in the court in Ibadan, which says that the authentic chairman of the party is who conducted the congresses of the party and who the party at the national level recognises.

    Do you intend contesting for governorship?

    There are people who would want to context for governorship. For me, I personally think we have to be better organised, otherwise we would lose and I don’t like losing. When the time comes, the decision to contest or not to contest, as far as I am part of the team that would deliver the governor, I am more than happy.

    If you are able to meet the governor, what would you tell him?

    I would tell him that you have the glorious opportunity to write your name in the annals of the glorious destiny of this great state but you have been a spectacular failure. When they put your picture in the State House or House of Assembly you will be one of the ones that I will point to because what is most important in this world is a legacy. What is your legacy? Is it the one of unpaid teachers, civil savants, dilapidated schools, a failing state economy, a rundown health service?   If you look at the Lagos Ibadan Expressway, you can develop a proper industrial hub there to address the challenges of those coming out from the universities without employment. You miss the opportunity and it is only because you don’t have the intellectual capacity to discern what is right.

    You have the opportunity. You even collected bail out money and yet you haven’t paid your teachers.

  • Senatorial chichidodos?

    You know of the bird, chichidodo?  In the fierce “civil war” among the first generation of Nigerian literati, one camp bombed the other as chichidodo — that pretentious bird that claims to hate filth but thrives on it.

    Those were the roaring 1970s, when the Nigerian university system had not been plagued by the rampaging military, who turned everything they touched into ash!

    The more Hardball thinks about it, the more he is convinced that the Senate, under Bukola Saraki, is some senatorial chichidodo (apologies to those warring literary titans). It craves respect. But its instinct is going back stuff, like the chichidodo to the faeces it claims to hate with a passion, that earns it nothing but citizen scorn and contempt.

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) Senate caucus reportedly told John Odigie-Oyegun, APC national chairman, that the Buhari executive should withdraw Saraki’s case before the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT), as some pre-condition for peace.

    Note, these blokes, so-called “progressive” senators, didn’t ask for swift but fair trial; and if Saraki is innocent, restore his honour.  All they want is a truncation.

    Would that be senatorial blackmail induced by culpable power delusion?  Or just a worse case of the guilty being afraid?

    Yet, in another breath, Senate President Saraki whines about how citizens don’t respect his assemblage, de jure the highest legislative chamber in the land, but de facto, widely perceived as a chamber of one-day-one-racket.

    But how are citizens supposed to respect a chamber that gives the sorry impression that though its members are bivouacked in that chamber by our votes, they are nonetheless sworn to acting against the Jeremy Bentham noble dictate of the greatest happiness of the greatest number?

    Besides, how can a serious chamber, a modern equivalent of the much revered Areopagus of Ancient Athens, play the doomed role of the heady fly that often got buried with the corpse?

    Whatever charges Saraki faces with the CCT, he allegedly committed as an individual.  He certainly had no senatorial input, into making his choices. The charges dated back to years before this eighth Senate, which is seriously baiting the dubious distinction as the worst Senate in Nigerian history.

    On the Saraki case, it started with what it clearly felt was intimidation — clearing out of the chamber for solidarity appearance with Saraki at the CCT. In their thinking perhaps, that was enough to terrify everyone and terminate the trial. The Senate of the Federal Republic was angry!

    That didn’t wash.

    After that, this brazen blackmail — spring Saraki from CCT, or no legislative dice!  And if that bluff is called?  They would shun what they are voted — and handsomely paid — to do?

    Did it ever occur to these senators that they project a body language — if not actual acts — of being chummy with corruption, the public be damned? And if you work that actively against the decent grain, why would anyone respect you?

    Ironically, Saraki was right: the Senate is a key democratic institution.  In fact, with the House of Representatives, it most symbolises democracy; for it is peopled by supposed people’s representatives that have clear empathy with their electors.

    When, however, that body behaves as though it came from Mars, and had nothing in common with its electors, it only shapes its own irrelevance.

    In another two years, the eighth Senate would have been history. So, these members are dispensable. But their less-than-stellar conduct risk gravely devaluing the Senate, as an institution, in the estimation of right-thinking persons.

    That is when the full price of this current rascality would mature.  By that time, members of the eighth Senate would have buzzed after the Saraki rot.  But it is the Senate’s reputation, as a democratic institution, that would be buried with the folly.

    Talk of senatorial chichidodos!

  • PDP wins Kogi East senatorial rerun

    A former Chief of Air Staff and member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Air Vice-Marshal Isaac Alfa (retd), has been declared winner of last Saturday’s Kogi East senatorial rerun.

    Alfa polled 57, 575 votes to defeat five others. The election held in 236 of the 1,080 polling units.

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) did not participate in the rerun due to an Appeal Court judgment which prohibited it from fielding a candidate.

    Returning Officer Prof. Lucky Ovwhasa said only 140, 297 of the 643,559 registered voters participated in the election.

  • Senatorial letter writer

    Once upon a time, on Gen. Muhammadu Buhari’s first coming as military head of state, there was a public letter writer.

    As Buhari’s Minister of Information, Prince Tony Momoh, famed journalist and lawyer, wrote what he called “Letter to My Countrymen”.

    In those missives, the minister engaged his compatriots on the best of patriotic practices.

    His principal, Gen. Buhari, scoffed at the fictive Andrew, that nevertheless epitomised the very popular notion among Nigerians back then, to “check out”, telling them: “Nigeria is our country. We must stay and salvage it together.”

    Minister Momoh reinforced that message, with his letter writing engagements, pleading with, persuading and logically prompting his compatriots to give their country a second chance; and join in its rebuilding.

    The media?  O, those ones were at their cynical worst. With the Buhari government’s exploits on Decree 2 and Decree 4 (under the second law, two top journalists were gaoled), they were too grumpy to be receptive to Buhari’s — and minister’s — redemptive pleas.  That was then.

    Now, at President Buhari’s second coming as elected president, a letter writer of a different hue has emerged.

    He is no less than Ike Ekweremadu, the deputy Senate president, who incidentally had written and launched, with fan fair, a book on “patriotism”, writing letters to hang his country on the gallows of the “international community”.

    Indeed, the quixotic search for the “international community”, in times of personal throes, is not new.  It was patented by Olisa Metuh, in the opening days of President Buhari’s tenure, as a sort of coping mechanism, that Mr. Metuh’s party had lost federal power.

    Senator Ekweremadu can, of course, insist that his letters didn’t hang his country — and Hardball would be the first to admit he didn’t necessarily have to admit that, since it was Hardball’s interpretation, and Hardball is not infallible.

    Besides, Ekweremadu and Hardball approach this matter from different prisms. Both are therefore logically bound to arrive at contrary destinations.

    Still, Hardball insists it is rich for the deputy Senate president, an integral part of the agency of the Nigerian state (not just a partisan apparatchik, like Mr. Metuh) is writing a letter excoriating his country, that gave him such a high platform to stand.

    It is even more condemnable that the so-called letter is premised on a base personal motive, which moves to confuse alleged personal indiscretions with the institutional health of the Senate and (illogic of all illogics) to conflate putative personal comeuppance with the mythical collapse of democracy!

    But while still at base motives: in that “international community”, where would a minority senator emerge as deputy Senate president, through an illicit and soulless trade-off, fuelled by crass careerism, and still show his opportunistic face, in the comity of “international senators”?

    Mr. Ekweremadu can write whatever letters he likes.  But in playing the victim and demagogue, he should at least recognise his limits. Surely, as a lawyer, he should know: he who comes to equity must come with clean hands!

    So, he should quietly go have his day in court and stop embarrassing himself and his country.

  • No to senatorial theatrics

    •Let those accused of forgery go prove their innocence in court

    A melodrama unfurls in the Nigerian Senate, on the alleged forgery of the Senate rules, used to conduct the election of Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki and his Deputy, Senator Ike Ekweremadu, in June 2015.

    After a rather lengthy investigation, Abubakar Malami, SAN, the justice minister and federal attorney-general, has given the go-ahead to prosecute the case.

    Being accused are Dr. Saraki, Mr. Ekweremadu, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa, the immediate past clerk of the National Assembly and Benedict Efeturi, his deputy. But for some delay, the quad should have been docked on June 21.

    The charge, more or less, is that whereas the last known Senate Rule was Senate Rule 2011 used by the 7th Senate, Saraki and Ekweremadu were allegedly elected on a legal instrument purporting to be Senate Rule 2015.

    Yet, there allegedly is no evidence of how and where Rule 2011 was amended to Rule 2015, since the 7th Senate was extinct; and the 8th Senate was just proclaimed, and its first official assignment was the election of its principal officers.

    The case, already assigned to Justice Haliru Yusuf  of the Federal High Court, Abuja, is a two-count charge of “Criminal conspiracy, contrary to Section 97 of the Penal Code Law” and “Forgery, contrary to Section 362 of the Penal Code Law”.

    But no sooner had the news broke than the Senate, as well as the House of Representatives, broke into a drama of cant, most disgraceful.

    Most disgraceful, not because the National Assembly reacted — reacting to public issues is a right under a democracy — but how it did. It gave the unfortunate impression that the National Assembly would stake its collective sanctity on the possible culpability of one or two members, even if those members are the senate president and deputy.

    Worse: it also gives the impression that legislators cannot be touched by the laws of the land simply because they are legislators! That is a fallacy that could have been comical, if it were not so tragic.

    Besides, the National Assembly appears to have sold itself the dummy that it could bluff to no end; and, in that process, subvert the due process of docking its members, accused of forging the Senate’s own rule.

    That much was obvious from the official bombast from Senator Sabi Abdullahi, Senate media and public committee chairman, threatening, pillorying and rather fondly pushing the doctrine of separation of powers, in a presidential democracy, as why accused individual senators cannot be docked for alleged crimes. That clearly negates what is trite in the Rule of Law: equality before the law.

    In a depressing resort to self-help and intimidation, for which the 8th Senate under Dr. Saraki is gradually becoming notorious, the Senate has even summoned the attorney-general to plenary, just as it indeed summoned Justice Danladi Umar, chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, just because Saraki is being tried before his court.

    Still, it is doubtful if summoning the AGF would change anything, for he has full powers, under the law, to order or discontinue the prosecution of a case; and a Senate flexing illegitimate muscles would not change that.

    Yes, there are talks about the alleged imperatives of someone, somewhere overthrowing Saraki and deputy; because of the controversy of their emergence. That is even the reckless Senate insinuation that the AGF is now alleged leader of such a plot.

    Such insinuations and counter-insinuations are part of politics. But they make hardly any dent on the due process of docking an accused person.

    At the end of the day, this is a criminal charge, which the state must prove before the accused persons suffer any penalty.

    That is why the Senate should quit these arid theatrics; and the accused, head for the courts to establish their innocence.

    Any other way would be tantamount to the Senate projecting a band that has absolutely no regard for the laws of the land, yet is bivouacked in the legislative chambers. Such an image would be grand betrayal of Nigerians who elected these individuals, into that hallowed assembly.

  • Why I lost senatorial election, by Osagie

    Why I lost senatorial election, by Osagie

    The Edo South senatorial election ended, the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate for last year’s Edo South senatorial election, Hon Samson Osagie, has said that he did not lose because of lack of popularity. He said he lost because his election was conducted the same day as the presidential election.

    The former Minority Whip in the House of Representatives was reacting to a statement by Governor Adams Oshiomhole that he lost the election because he was unpopular and that could not win his constituency.

    Osagie, who is now backing the deputy governor, Dr. Pius Odubu, in the race for the APC governorship ticket, said he lost to former President Goodluck Jonathan. He said: “Everybody knew that if that election was not combined, there was no way I would have lost.”

    He said the implications of his loss to the Peoples Democratic Party’s (PDP) Matthew Urhoghide was grave for the Edo APC, pointing out that it has become imperative for him to set the record straight.

    He described himself as a popular politician, who twice won elections into the House of Representatives, promising to ensure that the APC wins the September 10 governorship election.

    “For some people to say that I lost that election because I was not popular is to be economical with the truth. Everybody knew that if that election was not combined, there was no way I would have lost.

    “The point is clear that those who have continued to echo the loss of that election to my candidacy remains the sycophants they are and they are not telling the world the truth.

    “For those who want to give the impression that I lost that election because I was not popular, they just want to sweep under the carpet the various issues that accounted for the loss of that election.