Tag: SERAP

  • SERAP asks court to compel Fashola to name contractors who fail to execute power projects

    Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has asked the Minister of Power, Works and Housing Mr Babatunde Fashola (SAN) to disclose names and details of contractors and companies that allegedly collected money for electricity projects but failed to execute them starting from the return of democracy in 1999 to 2018.

    In a suit number FHC/L/CS/105/19 filed at the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos, SERAP is seeking “an order for leave to apply for judicial review and an order of mandamus directing and/or compelling Mr Fashola to provide specific details on the names and whereabouts of the contractors who collected public funds meant for electricity projects but disappeared with the money without executing any projects.

    The suit followed SERAP’s Freedom of Information (FoI) request dated January 4, 2019. It was filed on behalf of SERAP by its counsel, Adelanke Aremo.

    The organization giving Mr Fashola 14 days to publish “the names of all contractors and companies that have been engaged in the power sector since the return of democracy in 1999 to date, details of specific projects and the amounts that have been paid to the contractors and companies, details on the level of implementation of electricity projects and their specific locations across the country.”

    SERAP in the suit, is seeking: “an order directing and/or compelling the respondent to compile and make available to the applicant documents containing the specific names and details of contractors and companies that have been engaged in the power sector, details of projects, amount that have been paid to the contracts and companies, level of implementation of electricity projects and locations across the country and to publish widely including on a dedicated website, any such information since the return of democracy in 1999 to date.

    The organization also want the court to order the respondent to disclose if there is any ongoing investigation or prosecution of allegedly corrupt contractors and companies in the electricity sector

    It further asked the court to declare that the minister’s failure to provide the applicant with the required information amounts to a fundamental breach of the FoI Act 2011.

    SERAP sought a declaration of the court that the failure of the respondent to  disclose if there is any ongoing investigation or prosecution of allegedly corrupts contractors and companies in the electricity sector amounts to a breach of the FoI  Act 2011

    The organization said the publication of such names will make it hard for contractors and companies to get away with complicity in grand corruption stressing that the citizens have the right to see that the FoI  Act is enforced where there is an infraction of the right to information or a threat of its being violated, in matters of public interests.

    SERAP contended “by compelling Mr Fashola to name the contractors and their registration details, if any, Nigerians will be better able to hold them to account for allegedly absconding with public funds meant for electricity projects, thereby throwing the country into perpetual darkness and socio-economic stagnation as well as denying people their human rights”.

    It argued that granting the order as prayed would ensure that allegations of complicity in grand corruption by contractors and companies in the power sector do not go unpunished.

    “Unless the names of the contractors and companies are disclosed and widely published, alleged corrupt contractors and companies executing electricity projects will not be deterred and the victims of corruption that they committed will continue to be denied justice and effective remedies”, it contended.

    The organization noted that to date, no contractors or companies who allegedly collected money for electricity projects not executed or poorly executed have been investigated for corruption let alone prosecuted and fined while senior public officials who apparently served as intermediaries for these contractors and companies continue to escape justice.

    “The allegations of corruption involving many contractors and companies in the power sector have continued to impair, obstruct and undermine the ability of successive governments to provide Nigerians with access to regular and uninterrupted electricity supply. Contractors and companies that allegedly disappeared with public funds meant for electricity projects may also be liable for aiding and abetting the commission of acts of grand corruption.

    “Publishing the names of contractors will contribute to ending a pattern of corruption in the power sector and improve access of Nigerians to regular and uninterrupted electricity supply. It will also allow citizens to track the level of execution of electricity projects by contractors and companies and reduce impunity for corrupt acts in the sector.

    “Granting the reliefs sought will ensure that punitive and dissuasive measures are taken against corrupt contractors and companies, shareholders and others that might have any ownership interests in companies responsible for failed execution of power projects in the country”, it added.

    No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

  • SERAP: scrap security votes, immunity clause, others

    THE Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has asked major presidential candidates in the February 16 election to publicly commit themselves to innovative anti-corruption reforms.

    In an open letter to the presidential aspirants, SERAP urged them to scrap security votes, power sector corruption, judicial corruption and removal of immunity for presidents, vice-presidents, state governors and deputy state governors.

    They included President Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives’ Party (APC) and Atiku Abubakar of the People Democratic Party (PDP).

    Others include: the candidates of Allied Congress Party of Nigeria (ACPN) Oby Ezekwesili; Alliance for New Nigeria (ANN) (Fela Durotoye); Young Progressives Party (YPP) candidate (Kingsley Moghalu); KOWA Party (Sina Fagbenro-Byron); African Democratic Congress (ADC) (Obadaiah Mailafia); and African Action Congress (AAC) (Omoyele Sowore).

    In a statement issued yesterday by SERAP Senior Legal Adviser Bamisope Adeyanju, the organisation argued: “Consistent with their right to participate in their own government, Nigerian voters deserve a substantive debate during the campaign about issues that affect them, particularly with respect to combating corruption.

    “Now is the time to make commitment for specific reforms that will strengthen Nigeria’s anti-corruption record and standing in global ranking,” the group said.

    SERAP sets five main anti-corruption priorities that it asked the candidates to address and sought their position on each of the items.

    The letters, dated January 19, 2019, read: “Candidates should commit to scrapping security votes spending by presidents and state governors by repealing the constitution to include specific prohibition of security votes.

    “They should also commit to a comprehensive audit of spending on security votes by presidents and governors since the return of democracy in 1999 and directing their Attorney General and Minister of Justice to take legal action in the public interest to hold governments to account on spending on security votes.

    “Candidates should commit to repealing the Electric Power Sector Reform Act of 2005 to address regulatory lapses, which have continued to lead to systemic corruption and impunity of perpetrators, forcing ordinary Nigerians to pay the price for corruption in the electricity sector-staying in darkness, but still made to pay crazy electricity bills.

    “Candidates should commit to reopening all reports of corruption in the electricity sector and ensuring effective prosecution of corruption allegations, including corruption charges against Dr. Ransom Owan-led board of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission; allegations of looting of the benefits of families of the deceased employees of Power Holding Company of Nigeria; and the budgeted N16 billion between 2003 and  2007, which went down the drains as it failed to generate the needed amount of electricity.

    “Candidates should commit to establishing independent counsel and/or special anti-corruption courts in the six-geopolitical zones of the country for the effective and speedy prosecution of all former state governors indicted for corruption. They should also commit, within the first 365 days in office, to begin the constitutional reform process of removing the immunity clause in Section 308 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria (as amended) to promote effective leadership and improve institutions of governance.”

    SERAP added: “Candidates should commit to working with the judiciary to improve the independence of the National Judicial Council (NJC), including by reviewing requirements for its leadership to allow retired judges of proven integrity to lead the council.

    “They should also commit to working with and encouraging the Chief Justice of Nigeria and NJC to ensure that the Chief Justice of Nigeria and all other judges make periodic asset declarations and public disclosures of such declarations.”

  • SERAP to minister: name contractors absconding with power projects’ funds

    THE Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has asked Minister of Power, Works and Housing Babatunde Fashola (SAN) to provide information on names and details of contractors  that allegedly collected money for electricity projects, but failed to execute them.

    It said such information should cover the period, starting from the return of democracy in 1999 to 2018, including details of specific projects and the amounts that have been paid to the contractors and companies, level of implementation of electricity projects and their specific locations across the country.

    The request was made under the Freedom of Information (FoI) Act in a letter dated January 4, 2019 and signed by the SERAP Senior Legal Adviser, Ms Bamisope Adeyanju.

    “If the requested information is not provided within 14 days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter, SERAP shall take appropriate legal actions under the Freedom of Information Act to compel you to comply with our request,” it warned.

    SERAP noted that former Vice President and People’s Democratic Party (PDP) presidential candidate Alhaji Atiku Abubakar blew the whistle on Channels TV, when he reportedly said: “Contractors were given some contracts for power projects and were paid hundred per cent upfront. The money went down the drain. Up till now, we are not holding the contractors responsible. People have collected money upfront one hundred per cent and have disappeared; and have not even done any work.”

    The group added: “The revelation by Atiku is entirely consistent with SERAP’s recent report titled: ‘From Darkness to darkness: How Nigerians are paying the price for corruption in the electricity sector’, which also revealed how over N11 trillion meant to provide regular electricity supply was allegedly squandered by politicians and contractors under successive governments.”

    The organisation contended that by publishing the names of the contractors and their registration details, if any, Nigerians would be better able to hold them to account for allegedly absconding with public funds meant for electricity projects, thereby throwing the country into perpetual darkness and socio-economic stagnation as well as denying people their human rights.

    SERAP added that to date, no contractors who allegedly collected money for electricity projects not executed or poorly executed have been investigated for corruption, let alone prosecuted and fined. Senior public officials, who apparently served as intermediaries for these contractors and companies keep escaping justice.

    It argued that publishing the names would make it hard for contractors and companies to get away with complicity in corruption.

    “It is important to show that your office and indeed this administration would not shield or allow ingrained wrongdoing by contractors and companies in the power sector to go unpunished. Unless the names of the contractors and companies are disclosed and widely published, alleged corrupt contractors and companies executing electricity projects will not be deterred and the victims of corruption that they committed will continue to be denied justice and effective remedies,” SERAP stated.

  • SERAP sues Saraki for allegedly paying jailed Dariye N14.2m monthly

    THE Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a suit against Senate President Bukola Saraki over payment of N14.2 million allowance to former Plateau State governor Senator Joshua Dariye.

    In the suit filed at the Federal High Court, Lagos last Friday, SERAP is asking the court to stop the Senate President from paying former Senator Joshua Dariye N14.2 million monthly allowances while he serves out a 10-year prison sentence for corruption.

    Joined as co-defendants in the suit are Dariye and the National Assembly Service Commission.

    According to SERAP, Dariye is still receiving the N750,000 salary and N13.5 million monthly allowances from the Nigerian Senate six months after his conviction.

    The organisation said a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court in June convicted Dariye for diverting N1.162 billion state ecological funds while he was governor.

    The former Plateau State governor was sentenced to 14 years in prison, which was later reduced to 10 years by an Appeal Court in Abuja.

    Dariye is said to have been paid N85.5 million as allowances since his conviction in June.

    SERAP said such payment violates Nigerian laws and international obligations.

    SERAP is, therefore, seeking an order restraining Saraki and the National Assembly Service Commission from paying Dariye any further allowances while serving his jail term in Kuje prisons, Abuja.

    “SERAP is also seeking a declaration that Dariye’s seat in the Senate is automatically deemed vacant, having being convicted and sentenced to a prison term and currently serving jail term and having been absent at the sessions of the Senate for a period amounting in the aggregate to more than one-third of the total number of days allowed, and that he is, therefore, not entitled to any allowances reserved for a sitting and serving senator.”

    In addition, “SERAP is also seeking an order compelling Dariye to return salaries and allowances paid to him as a senator while in prison, having not performed the functions and office of a sitting and serving senator and having not deservedly earned such.”

    It argued that a judgment of a competent court of law subsists until set aside on appeal, adding that the Supreme Court of Nigeria has made this point very clear in several cases.

    No date has been fixed for the hearing of the suit.

  • Burutai asked to account for spendings on military operations

    Lt. General Tukur Yusuf Buratai, has been asked  to  account for spending on operation Lafiya Dole and Crocodile Smile.
    The request was made through the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act and signed by Bamisope Adeyanju, Seun Akinyemi and Atiku Samuel, on behalf of SERAP, EiE and BudgIT respectively.

    The groups said: “If the requested information is not provided within 14 days of the receipt and or publication of this letter, our organizations shall take all appropriate legal action under the Freedom of Information Act to compel you to comply with our request.”
    The organisations asked General Burutai to provide information on the 2015, 2016 and 2017 budget implementation reports of the Nigerian Army, including the amounts released (financial implications) and expended for the various operations the Army carried out.

    The groups also urged him to furnish them with “the amounts released (financial implications) and expended in fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017 for: Operation Lafiya Dole, Operation Safe Haven, Operation Python Dance, Operation Ruwan Wuta, Operation Delta Safe, Operation Mesa, Operation Harbin Kunama, Operation Awatse, Operation Tsera Teku and Operation Crocodile Smile.”

    The groups said: “Transparency of the budget process and its implementation is an essential condition to achieve good governance.
    “The reports, if provided and published, will shed light on military spending and put to rest once and for all the perceived lack of transparency and accountability in the spending of military budgets, which has been a subject of intense public debate and concern.”

    According to the groups: “several billions of naira allocated to the military to defend the country and protect its people have neither contributed to improving the ability of Nigerian soldiers to fight Boko Haram and other armed groups nor provided the much-needed security especially for Nigerians in the North-east of the country.”

    The FOI request read in part: “The information being requested does not come within the purview of the types of information exempted from disclosure by the provisions of the FOI Act.
    “The information requested for, apart from not being exempted from disclosure under the FOI Act, would serve the national interest, public welfare, public interest and peace, human rights, good governance, transparency and accountability.

    “By virtue of Section 1(1) of the Freedom of Information Act, 2011,we are entitled to request for or gain access to information, including information on 2015, 2016 and 2017 budget implementation reports of the Nigerian Army, and the amounts released (financial implications) and expended in fiscal years 2015, 2016 and 2017 for the various operations listed, which have yielded no tangible result.”

    “Also, by virtue of Section 4(a) of the FOI Act, when a person makes a request for information from a public official, institution or agency, the public official, institution or agency to whom the application is directed is under a binding legal obligation to provide the applicant with the information requested for, except as otherwise provided by the Act, within seven days after the application is received.”

  • SERAP seeks probe of military spending over Boko Haram killings

    A RIGHTS group, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), has asked the Federal Government to set up a commission of inquiry to investigate the spending of defence and military budgets between 1999 and 2018.

    The group said the probe would ensure that the funds meant for military operation are spent for that purpose as well as end the vulnerability and killings of Nigerian soldiers such as the reported death of several soldiers in Boko Haram attack at Metele, Borno State, on November 18.

    The request was contained in an open letter to President Muhammadu Buhari, dated November 23, 2018, by SERAP Senior Legal Adviser Ms Bamisope Adeyanju.

    The letter was sequel to the killing of 118 soldiers and officers by the Boko Haram sect during an attack on the 157 Task Force Battalion in Metele village.

    The organisation said the request also followed the case of 153 soldiers reportedly missing in action and Nigerian troops fighting on the frontline of the Boko Haram conflict, who reportedly deplored the poor state of their equipment, including outdated vehicles and that of over 27,000 people reportedly killed in the many years of Islamist insurgency in the Northeast.

    SERAP added that the conflict has triggered humanitarian crisis and left 1.8 million people without homes.

    The group, therefore, urged President Buhari to “immediately refer to the International Criminal Court (ICC) pursuant to article 13 of the Rome Statute, all allegations of corruption in the spending of funds meant to purchase arms to empower Nigerian soldiers to fight Boko Haram, including the apparent diversion and sharing of the over $2 billion under the former government of President Goodluck Jonathan and approved spending by your own government”.

    The group said: “In 2014, about N340 billion (US$1.7 billion) was allocated to the military. Also, a number of offices had budgets allocated to them in relation to the Boko Haram conflict. The military received the largest funds in the federal budget in 2014. In October 2014, the National Assembly approved a request to borrow US$1billion as an additional amount for purchase of military equipment. In 2015, about N375billion (US$1.8billion) was allocated to the military in the federal budget.

    “The same year, an interim report of the presidential investigations committee on arms procurement under the former president Goodluck Jonathan administration revealed an extra-budgetary spending to the tune of N643.8 billion and an additional spending of about $2.1 billion under the Goodluck Jonathan administration.”

  • SERAP: right to health is justiciable

    The socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has con-tended that health is a justiciable right of every Nigerian.

    It said the government must treat health as an enforceable right.

    SERAP said in a report: “It is only when government ensures that health is regarded as a justiciable right for all citizens, regardless of status or situation in life, that public healthcare system will assume minimum threshold of a developed healthcare system.”

    The 53-page report alleges ”humanitarian crisis, manifestations of corruption and how unhygienic conditions, severe shortages of medicines and medical supplies in the three hospitals made it extremely difficult for many Nigerians to obtain essential medical care”.

    The report, launched at the Citi-Height Hotels, Lagos is entitled: Failing healthcare: How Federal hospitals are letting down the poor and making healthcare a privilege rather than a right.

    It was presented to the media by pioneer Dean, School of Law, American University of Nigeria, Yola, Professor Dejo Olowu.

    It was part of the highlights of the public hearing held by SERAP to provide a forum for people to provide testimonies and submit complaints/petitions on allegations of corruption they encounter while accessing public services particularly in the health, education and water sectors.

    Olowu asked the civil societies to mobilise and support members of the community to use the rights-based approach to demand improved healthcare in the country.

    He advised them to activate remedial processes at national, regional and international courts and tribunals as appropriate and to expose the impunity in the public healthcare sector.

    He contended that civil society organisations have a responsibility to utilise their reporting mechanisms to showcase violations against the right to health under regional and international human rights treaties.

    The report reveals that healthcare delivery was failing at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, (LUTH) Idi Araba, National Orthopaedic Hospital, Igbobi (NOHIL), and the Federal Medical Centre, Ebute Meta (FMC).

    The study by SERAP sought to analyse evidence-based information on the causes of the failure in healthcare service delivery in Nigeria, using three of the frontline institutions of public healthcare delivery, namely, LUTH, NOHIL and FMC, all in Lagos State.

    It focused on healthcare service delivery at LUTH, NOHIL and FMC as representatives of the experiences in their counterparts across the country.

    The report, conducted between April and June, this year, showed a deterioration in the quality and safety of care in these hospitals.

    It claimed, for instance, that LUTH, NOHIL and FMC do not have enough cancer treatment machines, that Linear accelerator (LINAC), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT scan machines are not working optimally due to erratic electricity even as the hospitals do not have back-up plans.

    According to the report, “a LINAC costs about US$5 million and the six that the Federal Government procured for six teaching hospitals have packed up. The dialysis machine at LUTH is outdated and its functionality at the time of study was zilch. LUTH recently lost its accreditation to teach dentistry because all its five dental chairs had packed up and there is no functional dental engine available.”

    It further disclosed that “vital medical supplies such as oxygen, diagnostic machines, dental chairs, sterilising units, burns apparatuses, were in pronounced shortage. Overcrowded waiting rooms and wards were noticeable.

    The organisation claimed its researchers reported that some wards have no mosquito nets and that there is no waiting area for mothers with sick babies. There is the Gynaecology ward, at which entrance a small bench that could seat about four persons, was placed. The bench was occupied by patients’ relatives, presumably.

    “At the end of the corridor where the neonatal ward is, there is a similar four-seater bench, fully occupied. The bench, having been occupied, a group of people were standing. At the neonatal ward, a waiting room for mothers whose babies are on admission was not part of the hospital’s plan. The mothers have improvised.

    “A woman lay on the bare pavement under the staircase, taking a rest. Nearby was an area where waiting mothers had carved out as waiting area. A number of women, whose babies were on admission, were seen sitting or lying down on a mat or on the pavement.  With the laid mats, sacks of clothes, plates, buckets etc stacked against the wall and a woman washing clothes, it was clear that many a mother stay for days in this state.”

    According to SERAP: “The infant incubator or neonatal incubator is a rigid box-like enclosure in which an infant can be kept in a controlled environment for observation and care. Some of the incubators in LUTH are not working. It is either the heater is bad, or the monitoring mechanisms are not working. The incubators available in LUTH have been in use for over 15 years.”

    SERAP claimed that a nurse, who has worked for some years in LUTH, spoke to its researchers and revealed that “some beds in different wards are too old, but LUTH knows how to manage. Some of the available beds have become dilapidated. Some beds can cause accidents. They have beds from which patients can fall. It has really happened, and I’ve seen it happen. But they keep managing”.

    Another medical staff said, “Even bed sheets are in short supply. Patients use their wrapper for bed sheets sometimes. And when they use LUTH bed sheets, they are usually old and torn most of the time”.

    SERAP also quoted a senior doctor as saying that there is poor water supply in LUTH and water is supposed to be an essential commodity, especially in a hospital. It’s deplorable to the extent that water does not run in the taps. You are seeing LUTH’s flowers and wall paints, but it is rotten inside. I will be right to say things are not working optimally in LUTH.

    “Another senior medical officer at LUTH said, ‘LUTH is like a dumping ground for health care in Lagos. It’s usually the extreme cases that are brought to LUTH after treatment elsewhere has failed. Even if you’re rushed in as an emergency case, it’s not guaranteed that you’ll be attended to. Sometimes they’ll tell you there are no available beds unless you can afford the VIP section.

    “At all the three study sites, derelict and obsolete equipment were commonplace. Most wheelchairs in LUTH are stiff and old. They are not in optimal condition. There is a poor maintenance culture. Not even the lifts are working well. One can easily get stuck in an elevator; so it is better to use the staircases. The lift in E Block is bad to the extent that they got a man to manually operate the lift when people enter and are in transit. It doesn’t even have doors anymore.

    “LUTH has its own laboratories but the doctors their prefer to refer patients to the private laboratory because private lab are considered to be more efficient and delivered results quicker.”

    ”Another nurse at LUTH said: ‘The facilities are overstretched. To see a specialist on clinic days you have to leave your home by 4am or 5am to be at LUTH by 6.30am to join the queue early. Even at that, there are no guarantees you will be attended to’’.

    “Nurses are forced to pick and choose patients to attend to. The ideal World Health Organisation (WHO) standard is five nurses to one patient. In LUTH it’s two nurses to 30 patients. In each ward, there are about 30 patients, and there are only about four nurses for each shift. In the afternoon, there’ll be two nurses, and in the night, there’ll be two nurses.

    “Another nurse said sometimes, in the night, there is no light in the wards. Nurses sometimes use torchlight to attend to patients. LUTH electricity just recently improved, still electricity supply is epileptic. It’s still bad but it was worse. Before, there was no electricity at all day and night.’”

    “At Igbobi, no money, no treatment. Admission at Igbobi’s casualty ward is N5,000 per day. After the preliminary examination, tests and eventual diagnosis, patients must pay before they could be admitted into the appropriate ward for their conditions.

    “Patients get their syringes and needles, gloves, without it the doctor will not touch the patient. If they ask you for it and you don’t have it, they just walk away, they don’t have time. Privatisation of laboratories is another ill that the National Orthopaedic Hospital, Igbobi, has in common with LUTH.”

    To reverse the situation, the report advised the leadership in each of the hospitals on need to back up their commitment to enable data collection as well as performance tracking and reporting, increase the transparency in the execution of the budget planning process by publishing income and expenditure reports, ensuring the release of assigned budgets to the health sector and projects implemented.

    It said information on funded projects, on renovation and reconstruction will be vital to regaining the confidence of health workers and the public.

    It also counselled the board of these hospitals to live up to their responsibility by monitoring standard procedures and compliance in daily management, administration and the delivery of services, adding that where there are established cases of failures as we found during the study, there should be responses to ensure accountability.

    “The study in addition recommended that the federal government should allocate adequate resources for improving the quality of equipment and human resources in the public hospitals under its patronage” it stated.

  • SERAP to Ajimobi: Repair Ayefele’s building or face legal action

    Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, ( SERAP ) has sent an open letter to the Governor of Oyo State,  Abiola Ajimobi requesting him to “immediately halt all further eviction and demolition of Fresh FM building and to show full respect for the safety and dignity of residents and owner of Fresh FM.

    We also urge you to immediately begin repairs of the Fresh FM building and to adequately compensate the radio station and its owner and publicly guarantee non-repetition.”

    The organization urged Ajimobi to “ensure full and effective respect for the rights to freedom of expression and media freedom in Oyo State. We request that you take this step within 7 days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter, failing which SERAP will take national and international legal actions to compel your government to act in the public interest and the overall interest of the rule of law.”

    In the letter  dated 21 August 2018 and signed by SERAP deputy director Timothy Adewale the organization said, “We have information to suggest that the destruction of Fresh FM was based on political considerations and retaliation against the radio station on purported allegations of defamation against you. The facts suggest that the demolition of Fresh FM building failed to comply with the principle of lawfulness and reasonableness. The demolition was neither done in the public interest nor carried out to achieve a legitimate aim.”

    The organization said, “This apparently unlawful action has set a bad precedent, and created a high level of uncertainty and anxiety among many radio stations and other media organizations in Oyo State about the future because of the likelihood of their buildings being demolished when they are deemed to broadcast views which the Oyo State authorities may consider too critical or ‘defamatory’.”

  • SERAP seeks reversal of passport fees increament

    Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has urged President Bola Tinubu to direct the Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo and the Comptroller General of the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS), Kemi Nanna Nandap to immediately reverse the recent hike in international passports fees.

    SERAP described as “arbitrary, unlawful, unjustified, and excessive passport fees of between N100,000 and N200,000.”

    “We would be grateful if the recommended measures are taken within seven days of the receipt and/or publication of this letter. If we have not heard from you by then, SERAP shall take all appropriate legal actions to compel your government, the Minister and Comptroller General to comply with our request in the public interest.”

    The NIS last week announced that from September 1, 2025, applications made within Nigeria will attract new fees of N100,000 for the 32-page, five-year validity passport and N200,000 for the 64-page, 10-year validity passport.

    The organisation noted that the unreasonable price increase came barely a year after a similar increase on September 1, 2024.

    Read Also: SERAP wants mandatory e-transfer of polls’ results

    In the letter dated August 30, 2025 and signed by SERAP deputy director Kolawole Oluwadare, the organisation said: “the unlawfully high fees amount to a discriminatory denial of access to a passport to millions of socially and economically vulnerable Nigerians and unlawful restrictions of their other citizenship rights.”

     SERAP said, “millions of disadvantaged Nigerians cannot realistically afford to pay the increased fees. These Nigerians should not be forced to spend their limited and grossly inadequate income to pay the increased fees instead of spending it on their basic living needs.”

    According to SERAP, “The Minister of Interior and the Comptroller General of the NIS ought to comply with the Nigerian Constitution and the country’s international human rights obligations in the exercise of their constitutional and statutory duties.”

    The letter further read in part: “The increased fees will hit hardest those at the bottom of the economy. The Minister of Interior and the Comptroller General of the NIS have a legal responsibility to ensure an appropriate balance between the imposition of excessive passport fees on citizens and the safeguarding of citizens’ rights.

    “Nigerians who cannot afford to pay the excessive fees would be denied the effective enjoyment of their citizenship rights conferred by the Nigerian Constitution 1999 [as amended] and human rights treaties to which the country is a state party.

    “The unreasonable and disproportionate increase in passport fees is incompatible with the provisions of chapters 2 and 4 of the Nigerian Constitution covering fundamental objectives and directive principles of state policy and fundamental rights.

    “The excessive fees would also result in disproportionate financial burdens on poor Nigerians. The Minister of Interior and the Comptroller General of the NIS failed to assess the effects of the excessive fees in light of the poor financial conditions of millions of Nigerians and the growing economic challenges in the country.

    “The Minister of Interior and the Comptroller General of the NIS acted unlawfully when they arbitrarily increased the passport fees. The Minister of Interior and the Comptroller General of the NIS have rendered nugatory Nigerians’ fundamental rights by impermissibly and unlawfully increasing the passport fees.

    “The unlawful increase in passport fees at a time the country is facing economic and financial crises would contribute further to the impoverishment of the population.

    “The increased fees would also violate Nigerians’ right to travel or leave their country including the right to obtain the necessary travel documents. The Minister of Interior and the Comptroller General of the NIS have failed to sufficiently justify the increased fees.

    “The increase is discriminatory as it would undermine the effective enjoyment of citizens’ fundamental rights as guaranteed under the Nigerian Constitution and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Nigeria is a state party.

    “According to our information, the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) on Thursday 28 August 2025 announced an upward review of Nigerian Standard Passport fees with effect from September 1, 2025.

    “The NIS stated that in the new rates, applications made in Nigeria, which cost N50,000 for a 32-page booklet with five-year validity, will now cost N100,000 for the same page and validity period. It also stated that a 64-page passport booklet with 10 years validity will now cost N200,000 from N100,000.

    “The increase in passport fees is set to take effect on September 1, 2025. SERAP notes that the NIS in September 2024 also increased the cost of a 32-page passport booklet with a five-year validity from N35,000 to N50,000. It also increased the 64-page passport booklet with a 10-year validity from N70,000 to N100,000.” the organisation stated.

  • SERAP sues Fashola over power privatisation

    The Minister of Power, Works and Housing Mr Babatunde Fashola has been sued over his failure to account, for “the spending on the privatisation of the electricity sector and the exact amount of post-privatisation spending on generation companies (GENCOS), distribution companies (DISCOS) and Transmission Company of Nigeria”.

    Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) which instituted the court action also wants Fashola to explain if such spending came from budgetary allocations or other sources.”

    In the suit filed last week at the Federal High Court, Ikoyi, Lagos, SERAP is seeking “an order for leave to apply for judicial review and an order of mandamus directing or compelling Mr Fashola to provide specific details on the privatisation of the electricity sector, the names of all the companies and individuals involved; and to publish widely including on a dedicated website any such information.”

    The suit followed SERAP’s Freedom of Information request dated 7 May 2018 to Mr Fashola giving him 14 days to provide “information on the status of implementation of the 25-year national energy development plan, and whether the Code of Ethics of the privatisation process which bars staff of the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) and members of the National Council on Privatisation (NCP) from buying shares in companies being privatised were deliberately flouted.”

    The suit filed on behalf of SERAP by its counsel, Ms. Bamisope Adeyanju read in part: “Publishing the information requested and making it widely available to the public would serve the public interest and provide insights relevant to the public debate on the ongoing efforts to prevent and combat a culture of mismanagement of public funds, corruption and impunity of perpetrators.”

    “Most of the companies that won the bids had no prior experience in the power sector and little or no capacity at all to manage the sector. The privatisation of the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) have yielded the country total darkness. The gains of privatisation have been lost through alleged corruption, manipulation of rules and disregard to extant laws and lack of transparency in the exercise.”

    “To further highlight the seriousness of the situation, several years after the country’s power sector was privatised, millions of Nigerian households particularly the socially and economically vulnerable sectors of the population continue to complain about outrageous bills for electricity not consumed, and poor power supply from distribution firms.

    “Millions of Nigerians continue to be exploited through the use of patently illegal estimated billing by DISCOs. One wonders the essence of the privatisation if there has been no corresponding improvement in power for Nigerians.”

    “Enforcing the right to truth would allow Nigerians to gain access to information essential to the fight against corruption and provide a form of reparation to victims of grand corruption in the power sector. The UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in its General Comment 3 has implied that privatisation process should not be detrimental to the effective realisation of all human rights, including access to regular electricity supply.”

    “SERAP has the right to request the information under contention on the basis of several provisions of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, 2011. By Section (1) of the FoI Act, SERAP is entitled as of right to request for or gain access to information, including information on post-privatisation spending by the Federal Government and accounts of spending on the private entities such as GENCOS and DISCOS.”