Tag: Sex-for-mark

  • Re: Sex-for-mark as metaphor

    In the late 1960s and early – to – mid 70s, love made the world go round in University campuses, all over Nigeria. Anyone who lived through those hilarious times as students andteachers would  cringe in utter fright at the recent case of a highly placed academic, Professor Richard Akindele, who has lost not only his dignity and job, but also his freedom.

    One particular Lecturer, I remember, charismatic and very vivacious, now sadly, deceased, had his way with the daughters of Eve and was hilariously unapologetic about it. He loved life. Didn’t we all?! “Wine, women and song” was our motto, teachers and students alike!

    What were all those campus Clubs for? What was SIGMA at U.I. for? We all, students and teachers and Administrators led roaringly sexcessful lives, in and out of campus, in and out of town!

    In the current unforgiving climate, the said Lecturer would be brought back from the grave, charged retroactively for his “criminal” sexcapades and sentenced to life imprisonment with “rock-hard” labour!

    The aforesaid Lecturer must be scratching his egg-head, right now, in his grave, wondering what has become of the gaiety, the joy of living and the complicit vivacity of those fun-filled days. Where have all the flowers gone,and the  chivalry, and the art/craft/science of wooing, and the exhilaration of winning, the gallantry at losing? “What’s become of them?”, he would moan.

    But the tendentious hypocrisy of it all on the part of students, of teachers, and of the society as a whole, in the particular case of Dr. Akindele would fill the good old Professor with utter disgust. He would “name and hail” everybody, from Vice – Chancellors down to lowly Assistant Lecturers and Graduate Assistants, passing by of course, Professors, Readers, Senior Lecturers, Lecturers – above –the bar, and Lecturers II. “We all had ‘rods”, he would bellow! “And the damsels were willing”, he would wink! Above all, the good old Prof. would descend on poor Akindele and chastise him for cheapening himself, his status, and his life work, in such an egregiously clumsy manner, with a wife at home, countless “Viviane–In-Willing” at his beckand call, in it for the fun – and pocket money – not for the marks!

    “Pshaw!”, the good old Prof. would hiss from the grave! “Absolutely without class!” (Pun duly intended!).

    Some pity, all said and done, for the scape–goat randy Lecturer Richard Akindele! It’s so sad!

     

    Dr. Olu Oyawale,

    08062508912,

    boldej2002@gmail.com

  • OAU sex-for-mark jailed six years

    A Federal High Court sitting in Osogbo, Osun State, yesterday sentenced former senior lecturer at the Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife Prof. Richard Akindele to six years’ imprisonment for demanding sex to pass his student, Miss Monica Osagie.

    The presiding judge, Justice Maurine Onyetenu, gave the judgment after the former don had changed his plea from “not guilty” to “guilty”.

    Akindele, on a four-count charge, was sentenced to 24 months on count one, 24 months on count two, one year on count three and another one year on count four.

    The judge, who ruled that the jail term should run concurrently, ordered that Samsung S4 phone of the victim should be returned to her and Samsung S8 phone of the defendant should be forfeited to the Federal Government.

    After the judgment, defence counsel Francis Omotoso pleaded with the court to suspend the sentence.

    He negotiated for a plea bargain, but Justice Onyetenu declined, saying: “The rampant cases of students’ harassment by lecturers should be stopped.”

    The judge, who affirmed that plea bargain was not absolute, said it was at the discretion of the court.

    Read also: The Ife sex-for-marks investigation

    She said: “This kind of issue is too rampant in our tertiary institutions. We send children to school; they come home telling us that lecturers want to sleep with them. We cannot continue like this. Somebody has to be used as a scapegoat. Even primary school pupils are complaining.

    “Telling me to suspend sentence does not arise. Plea bargain does not arise. May be the case continues to occur and reoccur because someone has not been used as a scapegoat. It is time for the court to start upholding the right of the children, especially female students. The case is endemic.”

    The defence counsel told the court that Akindele had lost his job and learnt his lesson, adding that the university had discovered an error in the victim’s examination paper’s marking  and had concluded plans to compensate her.

    The counsel further told the court that the OAU management was planning to make offices of lecturers open by building the front side with glasses, to discourage immorality.

    But the judge turned down the prayer of the counsel, saying: “Do you think they do it in the office? They go to hotels.”

    Counsel to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), Mr. Shogunle Adenekan, had urged the court to confiscate the phone of the defendant and make him forfeit it to the        Federal Government.

    He said sensitive materials were discovered in the phone during forensic investigation, but advised that the phone of the victim be released to her.

  • Sex scandal: OAU ASUU chapter hails prof.’s suspension

    The Academic Staff Union ( ASUU ), Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, says it is satisfied with the suspension Prof. Richard Akindele, who was allegedly involved in a sex-for-mark scandal.

    Dr Adeola Egbedodun, the Chairperson of the union, in a statement in Osogbo on Friday, commended the university management for the prompt action taken on the recommendations of the investigative panel.

    The Vice Chancellor of the institution, Prof. Eyitope Ogunbodede,  on Thursday confirmed the suspension of the professor.

    Ogunbodede, in a statement, said he had received and considered the interim report of the committee set up to investigate the allegation, as revealed in the audio recording.

    He also said that the female voice in the audio which went viral had been identified as that of Miss Monica Osetobe Osagie, a postgraduate student on the Master of Business Administration programme.

    Read Also: OAU sex for marks: I was never invited by the committee – Monica Osagie

    Egbedokun, however, urged the Vice Chancellor and his team not to relent in their efforts to get to the root of the matter and ensure that justice was done.

    “The Obafemi Awolowo University Branch ASUU commends the administration for the step taken towards ensuring sanity in the system.

    “The union expresses satisfaction on the prompt action taken by the administration.

    “ASUU OAU reiterates its commitment to defending the integrity of the code of conduct of the university and to upholding its ethical standards.’’

    Egbedokun, however, urged members of the union to always adhere strictly to the code of conduct guiding their appointment in the university as they carry out their lawful activities.

  • Curtailing sex-for-mark scandals

    Many tertiary institutions have anti-sexual harassment policies. But the effectiveness of these policies have not been tested because many cases go unreported. Kofoworola Belo-Osagie, Adegunle Olugbamila, Jane Chijioke, Yusuf Idegu (Jos), Ndidi Okodili (Owerri) and Bisi Oladele report.

    The committee looking into the sex- for-mark scandal at the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, is expected to submit its report this week. The scandal was blown open when an audio recording of a telephone conversation between Prof Richard Akindele of the Department of Management and Accounting, and a yet-to-be-identified student seeking better grades in his course went viral on the social media.

    OAU Vice Chancellor Prof Eyitope Ogunbodede has promised to deal with the matter in line with the institution’s anti-sexual harassment policy.

    In a statement last week, he described sexual harassment as a serious misconduct that is “totally and morally reprehensible” , which  the university would never condone whether the offender is a staff member or student.

    The Nation gathered that many institutions have policies that frown at sexual harassment.  But their effectiveness is a different matter.

    The Federal University, Oye Ekiti (FUOYE) Vice-Chancellor, Prof Kayode Soremekun, told The Nation that there was no room for sexual harassment in his school.

    “Like any other university, Federal University Oye Ekiti has a clear-cut policy on the issue.  And it is one of zero tolerance for such an anti-academic act.  If a lecturer is caught in such an act, he will face a disciplinary panel and justice will take its course. Similarly, if the student is the culpable party, he/she will be made to face the rigours of our statutory provisions,” he said.

    When asked about what students should do if they are faced with sexual harassment, Soremekun said: “The subsisting reporting line is such that the student has various options.  He/she can report to the head of department who will, in turn, take up the issue with other indices of the hierarchy. Another option is for the student to report to other bodies like Servicom, the Dean Students’ Affairs and, lastly, but certainly not the least, executive members of the Students’ Union.”

    The position of the Federal University of Technology, Owerri (FUTO) is not different.  Its Public Relations Officer (PRO), Dr. Chike Ezenwa, said the Vice Chancellor, Prof. Francis Eze, did not take kindly to any act that flouted the values of the university.

    His words: “The VC has absolute zero tolerance for any action that suggests sexual harassment or sorting. The administration of the vice chancellor is hinged on the mantra, ‘driving the Culture of Excellence’.

    “The university does not take lightly to any case of sex-for-mark or any other practice that runs contrary to the values of the university. Those that were involved in such act in the past were summarily dealt with and there has never been any such case ever after.”

    Mr Niyi Oduwole, PRO, Olabisi Onabanjo University (OOU), Ago-Iwoye, said sexual harassment rarely occured in the institution.

    He said students had direct access to the vice chancellor and were encouraged to send text messages to his mobile phone without mentioning their names.

    “We have a Staff Ethics Committee in which erring staff face with respect to any infractions.This university has its own rules and regulations. Issues, such as this (sexual harassment) rarely happens in OOU; but if it occurs, such lecturer or administrative staff would be investigated and, if found guilty, would most likely be dismissed,” he said.

    Lagos State University Vice Chancellor Prof Lanre Fagbohun said the university’s whistle-blowing policy protects students who wish to report sexual harassment.

    “The university has a whistle-blowing policy in place that encourages students to speak up whenever there is an abuse.  Students are able to make reports to the deans of their faculties. We encouraged whistle- blowing because we believe it is one way we can get information from students. When we get information, we go after it quietly. And if you observe, disciplinary process has been very strict and we shall continue along that line. Our students are still open to engage with us from time to time,” he said.

    At the Plateau State University (PLASU), Bokkos, sexual harassment is treated under examination malpractice, said the PRO, Mr John Agbams.

    “The university has two standing committees, that is Exams Malpractice Committee and Disciplinary Committee. Sexual harassment during exams is treated as exams malpractices.  It is a practice in the university that after each exam, the exams malpractices called on all the faculties to submit report of malpractices recorded. The reports are collated and thoroughly investigated,” he said.

    At the University of Jos, any lecturer caught harassing students for sex is sent packing.

    However, despite the elaborate rules and  code of conduct of many tertiary institutions against sexual harassment, not many cases are reported because the level of reporting is low – by students and lecturers.

    For instance, PLASU PRO said since the university’s inception in 2005, no case of sexual harassment had been reported by students.

    “In the history of the university, there has been no reported case of lecturers demanding sex for marks or a case of students offering sex to influence her grade,” Agbams said.

    In the past three years, the Gender Mainstreaming Office (GMO) of the University of Ibadan, set up to handle sexual harassment related issues has handled 30, most of which its head, Prof Stella Odebode, said were non-sex related.

    Many students, who spoke with The Nation, said they did not report harassment for fear of victimisation. They argued that sexual harassment was more rampant than the institutions like to admit.

    Yewande Solarin, a 300-Level Law student of the University of Lagos (UNILAG), said students do not trust those they have to report to.

    “Most times students are forced to get evidence to prove their point, if at all they voice out. When they do, what level of protection does she get in return from school? Because obviously, lecturers would want to deal with that student. In the long run, it will tell on her result and might even delay her graduation.

    “Secondly, if a student should report such cases, how morally upright is the lecturer she is reporting it to? The truth is that, some lecturers feel they are above students, so they leverage that to victimise students,” she said.

    Another student simply called Amoke said she was unaware of her school’s sexual harassment policy.

    “I do not know if there is any policy on sexual issues in this school. If at all there is, how feasible is it? Because since I came into this school, I have heard countless sexual cases.  My roommate once told me that almost all the girls in her class had resorted in one way or the other to do the bidding of their lecturers. These lecturers know definitely there is a law against sexual harassment and they know how to play their game and that is why it is not effective, most especially when they have your matric number,” she said.

    An OOU graduate, names withheld, expressed shock when told sexual harassment was a rare occurrence in her alma mater.

    “That is not true.  My eldest sister was a victim of sexual harassment at OOU. Her lecturer told her and her friend that they would never pass his course if they did not sleep with him, no matter who they reported him to. They both had to resort to prayers. I remember my mother made it a prayer point even in church. The man finally left them when he claimed he saw them in his dream chasing him with a cutlass,” she said.

    A recent graduate of UNILAG’s Faculty of Art claimed to have escaped sexual harassment only because of her “long legs”.

    “Mine is something I do not want to talk about. I must say that I am happy I didn’t have extra year. I had to use my ‘long legs’ to tackle the issue. Because which lecturer will you report it to because you would be amazed that both lecturers and HOD (head of department) are guilty. It was not funny that period. It was when I took the bold step that other victims started voicing out.  My case became popular that it got to the vice chancellor’s notice,” she said.

    A student of the Yaba College of Technology said she would be afraid to report sexual harassment to the authorities when asked if she would speak up “because I do not know whether the lecturer and the HOD are friends.”  She said she would only do it under extreme pressure.

    The situation is not really different the other way round. Lecturers hardly report students who pressure them for marks with sex or cash or gifts.

    A lecturer at the Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, who did not wish to be named, said though students pressured lecturers, they only discussed the pressure among themselves.

    The academic, who argued that many lecturers also faced harassment because students lured their teachers to influence better grades, said: “Lecturers do not report harassment. They may just say it within our circle but may not report it officially. We only know among ourselves what is happening.

    “Even after exams, we, that are females, they will be calling you, ‘Please Ma, help me’ as if it is in my hands to pass them, not theirs.  Some students are ready to give to the lecturers freely whether sex or cash.  Some of them are so naïve and some of them don’t even have the willpower to pass. They go to harass the lecturers,” she said.

    A professor at UNIJOS, who simply gave his name as Oyelami, said lecturers endured a lot from students.

    “The society should commend we, lecturers, for containing with sex offers from students. If you are in my shoes, you will understand this better. We are under pressure from our students constantly; it is not a joke. But we are also dealing with them appropriately by mentoring them and teaching them how to read and pass exams on their own using their brain,” he said.

    To address the problem, the microbiologist at Niger Delta University said the situation would improve if more students and lecturers reported cases and they were dealt with.

    “Students don’t report. That is the problem. They feel if they report, they will be victimised, but we encourage them to.

    “Even as an academic, I cannot deal on hearsay. The truth is that, if we have more reports, if students are bold enough to report and come out with evidence by using their phones to record their encounter with randy lecturers, then perhaps the cases will reduce,” she said.

    On her part, Bolu Aderigbigbe, a student of YABATECH, said students should stop being too familiar with lecturers.

    “Stop visiting lecturers in their offices and outside. These are avenues that breed such harassment,” she said.

  • Sex-for-mark as metaphor

    His guttural voice oozes the geniality only long practice at the game could confer. Excitement over the coming harvest would, in fact, seem telegraphed subtly by his very ring-tone – a line from a classic number by Miliki grandmaster himself, Ebenezer Obey, to wit: “Adura fun awon to ‘nsoro wa lehin o, Edumare dari ji won o” (Prayer for the backbiters, Forgive them O God).

    But just when you thought he had already secured the mug’s handle, came an accident between the cup and the lips. So, his intumescent smile turns detumescent frown. Since the audio of the x-rated conversation went viral last week, the owner of the complicit male voice has been identified as Professor Richard Akindele, thus a suspect in a clear sex-for-mark deal gone awry, casting a sleazy shadow over Obafemi Awolowo University.

    So, it is clear the lyrical prayer invoked at the outset against “backbiters” was not granted after all.

    The details are no less lurid. In the viral audio posted on the social media obviously by the no less suspect prey, we hear the predator – a supposed professor of Accounting and, worse, described as a senior pastor in the local church – haggle over sex with the ardour of a parsimonious housewife at a grocery store. But wait, could the tongue that preaches holiness also be incubating carnality in the same breath?

    Inverting some strange mathematical logic into a clearly illicit transaction, the audio Prof then postulates that nothing other than five bouts of sex would incentivize the upgrading of the soliciting female student’s miserable 33 point to 40.

    Scared apparently by the whopping quantity, the young lady expressed wonder, “Is it food?”

    While the 4-minute bargain lasted, it was clear the presumably young lady has been dodging the Prof’s cocked short-gun for a while.

    Since then, the Prof has not only gone into hiding but also kept a silence that can only incriminate. How ironic – a professor of Accounting is now shy to give account of what really happened.

    It will, however, be myopic to assume that it is only the tutor and his female quarry who are in the dock here. Equally on trial is the moral integrity of those sociologists call “significant others” in a society increasingly challenged ethically.

    In more ways than one, both characters, therefore, hold a mirror on the larger society. The Prof speaks to those in a position of power who prey on the vulnerable. Be they the prosperity cleric who bears false prophesy to the gullible flock and so soil their cassock with filthy lucre. Or lawmakers who parlay legislative license to award unconscionable pay to themselves. Or the reporters who feast on blackmail.

    In the female student, we see a covetousness to bag what was not earned. Maybe, she was doing “runs” (euphemism for campus prostitution) while her mates were burning the proverbial midnight candle. Her male counterpart does “sorting” (cash offer) to lecturers instead.

    To be sure, no one is saying sexual harassment in ivory towers is a new phenomenon. Back in my student days many, many years ago at the Federal Poly, Ado- Ekiti, for instance, I won’t forget hearing a senior lecturer at the department office telling a female classmate of mine sobbing over her poor score, “You caused it by not cooperating and your arrogance”.

    The same lecturer – old enough to be our dad, if not grandpa – later began to eye me with malice and envy. At the next slightest opportunity, he went as far as singling me out in the middle of a lecture in a packed auditorium for a vicious ridicule, simply because he always seemed to find me around his target.

    From my subsequent UNILAG days, I am also still haunted till date by the echoes of lamentations by hapless fellow female students returning from a particular lecturer who, though often camouflaging with a cleric’s white collar around campus, was said to have perfected the art of pulling female students by the strap of bra on the shoulders while pretending to be playful.

    Of course, then, there was subtlety to such sexual extortion and victims would discussed in hushed tones. Not on the scale of impunity now on display.

    Today, it is a perhaps a measure of our now clearly vandalized moral universe that indifference – rather than outrage – has been the response from both high and low quarters. It only suggests the normalization of an abnormality, the tendency of quibble or equivocate – if not surrender – in the face of evil.

    We see that in the apparent double-speak by the OAU management. When the scandal broke initially, there was a pledge to get to the bottom of the infamy. We would hear another tale last weekend. But the university only mocks itself if it now says it can no longer act simply because the lady in question had refused to step forward.

    Really, the debt OAU owes the public here is a moral one, not legal technicality. Phone numbers and call logs can be verified, if indeed there is a strong commitment to seek the truth. To say nothing of the aforementioned Miliki ring-tone.

    There was also a mention of ongoing MBA exams in Moro. Was the Prof present or billed to attend? Was it a mere coincidence that the lady repeated the Prof’s name and the addressee, in what would then seem a fleeting moment of gumption and discretion, had to bark at her to stop mentioning his name?

    A good precedent was, in fact, set in 2016 following similar media reports of an epidemic of sexual predation at Auchi Polytechnic. The Federal Ministry of Education did not demand or make a public show of the appearance of any of the victims as pre-condition to do the right thing.

    Working together with relevant agencies like the DSS, EFCC and the National Board for Technical Education, the Ministry unleashed a manhunt, resulting in the dismissal of 12 lecturers for trysts and extortion.

    Elsewhere at the University of California, authorities did not shop for legal technicality when a professor of Architecture, Nezar AlSayyad, was accused of sexual harassment by a Phd student in 2016. An enquiry instituted by the school management eventually established numerous other incidents of inappropriate behavior by the tutor dating back to 2012, though the man at the centre of the storm continued to deny. The school had to pay the student $80,000 compensation.

    No less disturbing also is the continued silence from the Ife Diocese of the Anglican Church (where the Prof is said to have built a reputation as a powerful preacher) since the scandal broke. If the accused chooses to keep sealed lips, the church, as a supposed bastion of chastity and the repository of social virtues, cannot afford such luxury. The least expected of the church in the circumstance is to encourage him to come out and defend his integrity or have him excommunicated until his innocence is established.

    Again, we expect the women-based NGOs to take up the gauntlet. It is possible that the chief reason the lady is reluctant to step forward and state her case is the fear of victimization by other sex rats lurking around the OAU faculties. It is the duty of such bodies to rally around her and help broker a deal of protection.

    In the final analysis, the challenge lies ultimately with the larger society to return to the building block of the community – the family unit. Social re-orientation is sorely needed for a rebirth rooted on strong moral values.

    Confident and conscientious children don’t fall from the sky; they are often the products of stable and ethically-grounded parents. You don’t expect dads and mums who themselves are found wanting to give what they do not have.

    Re: Gates and the Nigerian ostriches

    Let Nigerians know that Bill Gates will only say things that can be backed up with real data. The class to which he belongs makes him very careful and whatever he says can be defended anywhere in the world.

    Please remind them that many very brilliant Nigerians like Dr. Vincent Ahonkhai spent their most productive lives working for Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and  just retired. Nigeria as a country does not engage Nigerian professionals to execute solutions to problems in Nigeria, largely because of regional quota considerations etc. Mediocrity of course, is the result.

    If there is conscience remaining anywhere in Nigeria, Dr. Vincent Ahonkhai who actively executed these projects for Gates Foundation all over the world especially in West Africa, should be found and brought back to Nigeria to help out, instead of the “ostriches”.

    Bill Gates is not looking for reelection to any office. He and other rich people like Aliko Dangote are driven by their convictions. Our people are dying needlessly or being pushed to extreme human desperation as selling their young children even before they are born, because of the activities of politicians and civil servants! Very sad.

    I take the trouble to write this rejoinder as my own contribution to make us Nigerians seek a return to our old decent ways when the lower class had confidence that the upper class, consisting of politicians and civil servants, would make them enjoy the promised dividends of Nigeria’s Independence – peace and economic emancipation of all Nigerians.

     

    • Olu Edeki,

    abuome.edeki@gmail.com