Tag: sexual harassment’

  • Man, 34, remanded for defiling 7-year-old

    A 34-year-old man, Tunde Eyifunjowo, who allegedly defiled a seven-year-old girl, was on Monday remanded in Kirikiri Prisons, on the orders of an Ikeja Magistrates’ Court.

    Eyifunjiwo, who resides at Ojodu, Lagos, was docked for alleged defilement.

    When the case was called up, the Magistrate, Mrs B.O. Osunsanmi, refused to take the plea of the defendant.

    She ordered that the accused be kept behind bars pending legal advice from the State Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

    Earlier, ASP Ezekiel Ayorinde, the prosecutor, told the court that the accused committed the alleged offence sometime in November 2018 at his residence.

    He said that the accused defiled the seven-year-old daughter of his co-tenant.

    “The accused called the girl inside his room, gave her biscuit and had sexual intercourse with her.

    “The girl who is living with her grandmother told her what the accused did to her.

    “She told her grandmother that was the fourth time the accused would be having sexual intercourse with her.

    “Her grandmother reported the case and the accused was arrested,” the prosecutor said.

    The offence violated Sections 137 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the section prescribes life imprisonment for offenders.

    The case was adjourned until Jan. 21 for mention.

  • Varsity sacks 63 lecturers for sexual harassment, others

    The management of Ebonyi State University (EBSU), Abakaliki said yesterday that it had sacked 63 lecturers for sexual harassment, certificate forgery, extortion, among others.

    Spokesman Patrick Itumo confirmed the sack to The Nation.

    He said some of those sacked were lecturers who had overstayed.

    Itumo said most of those sacked reportedly obtained the West African School Certificate Examination (WASC) before the First School Leaving Certificate.

    They were said to have falsified their birth certificates and other credentials.

    The spokesman said the sack followed audit report submitted by a committee set up to verify workers’ credentials.

    He urged students, who have suffered sexual harassment, to report the incident to the school authority.

    Itumo said the management would protect such students from victimisation.

     

     

  • LASU dismisses three lecturers over sexual harassment

    LASU dismisses three lecturers over sexual harassment

    Lagos State University (LASU), Ojo yesterday confirmed the dismissal of three of its academic staff for sexual harassment and misconduct.

    Spokesman Ademola Adekoya said the Governing Council took the decision at its 119th Statutory Meeting on October 4, as recommended by the Joint Council/Senate (Academic) Disciplinary Committee.

    He noted that the university had demonstrated zero tolerance for sexual harassment and indiscipline.

    According to him, the council approved the promotion of 49 academic staff and 200 non- academic workers.

    Adekoya said 29 non-academic staff had benefited from an internal recruitment exercise recently conducted by the university.

    “They include 18 administrative officers II, three technologists II, four system analysts, two academic planning officers II and two industrial liaison officers,” he added.

    Adekoya said the decision was in line with the university drive to promote the welfare of deserving workers and students.

  • Lagos takes campaign against sexual harassment to workplace

    Lagos State Government has commenced campaign against sexual harassment in workplace.

    The exercise, organised by the Lagos State Domestic and Sexual Violence Response Team (DSVRT), is intended to “proactively address sexual harassment in the workplace”.

    The campaign slogan, according to DSVRT Co-ordinator, Mrs Titilola Vivour-Adeniyi, is: Lagos says no to sexual harassment in the workplace.

    The team visited Unilever Nigeria Plc, where the staff were enlightened on steps to take to report incidents of sexual harassment.

    The management, Vivour-Adeniyi said, was exposed to the role of corporate organisations in ensuring safe spaces, and the impact of sexual harassment, some of which include depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Urging corporate organisations to have structures in place for reporting, she reiterated that sexual harassment is a crime and that the state government reserves a right to intervene.

    Vivour-Adeniyi also disclosed that DSVRT engaged over 100 human resource professionals and psychologists from various corporate organisations at a workshop organised by Employee Assistance Professionals Association.

    According to her, the engagement was focussed on the impact of domestic violence on the workplace.

    She said the participants were informed of what domestic violence is, and the negative impact of domestic violence on survivors.

    She listed some of the negative impact of domestic violence to include inability of victims to fully participate in the workforce, reduced productivity, frequent absenteeism, loss of job, potential harm to employees, co-workers or customers when violent abusers enter the workplace.

    Vivour-Adeniyi said a survey was conducted on the impact of domestic violence on the workplace.

    “Majority of women sampled also said they recorded a number of mistakes, felt tired at work due to sleep deprivation and generally unable to work well,” she stated.

    The DSVRT chief said the Response Team can be reached on 0813-796-0048 or by dialling *6820#.

  • FUT Minna lecturer dismissed for ‘sexual harassment’

    A lecturer in the Department of Geology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State, Omananyi Yunusa Adinoyi, has been dismissed for alleged sexual harassment.

    Adinoyi’s dismissal was approved during the University Council’s 131st meeting.

    A lecturer, who pleaded for anonymity, said the case has been on for about three months after a committee was raised to investigate the allegations.

    According to him, there were discriminatory evidences against Adinoyi as the student involved provided audio recording of their conversation and the act.

    It was however learnt that Adinoyi and the student have been dating for a while.

    “It is not as if he forced her; it was a mutual affair, and we don’t know why the girl blew the lid.

    “He was not dismissed because he slept with the girl; the University is angry that the act was committed inside his office because the evidence and tape did not show he forced her.

    “It is also not clear that he has not been intimidating the girl since she is a student in his department. And there was no way he could have exonerated himself that he did not use his position to intimidate the student. All evidences were against him,” the source explained.

    The University Council also approved the withdrawal of 13 postgraduate students for poor academic performance. Of the number, 12 are Masters and the last a Postgraduate Diploma student.

    Six of them are in the department of Biochemistry, three in Mathematics, two in Mechanical Engineering and one in the department of Computer Science.

  • Sexual harassment: ASUP calls for investigation in tertiary institutions

    The Academic Staff Union of Polytechnics ( ASUP ) on Tuesday urged the management and governing council of tertiary institutions to conduct thorough investigation into cases of sexual harassment.

    Mr Usman Dutse, National President of ASUP, made the plea in an interview with our reporter in Lagos.

    Dutse said that the union would not defend any lecturer caught involved in act of sexual harassment or abuse against their students.

    Commenting on recent incidence of sexual harassment in some universities, ASUP president said that the union had made its stance clear to all members of the union over the disrespectful act.

    ASUP president said that the union was working with the management in various institutions to curtail and punish all those involved in these kinds of activities.

    He said any lecturer involved in sexual harassment has abused the ethical conduct and practice of lecturing in higher institutions and should be made to face the consequences.

    Dutse said: “What we are asking for is adequate investigation and nobody should be punished without thorough investigation.

    “If you punish a suspect without adequate proof and evidences, it is another offence and also a violation.

    “We should avoid victimisation because in some cases, it may be a setup or gang-up.”

    The ASUP president warned lecturers to avoid any unethical practice that could ridicule the profession.

    “This do occur in almost all tertiary institutions, and even, in the basic primary and secondary schools.

    “There are instances where principals, teachers and heads masters in primary schools molest their pupils, talk less of tertiary institutions where there are matured youths.

    “It is an unfortunate incident; as a union, we condemned it in totality, it is a bad behaviour.

    “We always discourage our members from participating in such act and the union will never support any member that is involved in that kind of activities.

    “We have made our position known to our members, because it is unethical for a lecturer to be involved in any sexual abuse or harassment.

    “As a lecturer, you are a teacher, a father, a guardian and a mentor.

    “The relationship of lecturer is not only in the area of academic and mentor, but both spiritual and social; so you need to serve as a father, guide and counsel,” he said.

  • Sexual harassment: What next for dismissed dons?

    What next for dons said to have sexually harassed students for marks? This is the question many are asking following the dismissal of some professors for this act. They should be prosecuted, say some senior lawyers. Kofoworola Belo-Osagie, Adegunle Olugbamila, Damisi Ojo, Nicholas Kalu and Odunayo Ogunmola report.

    The sacking of Prof Richard Akindele by the Governing Council of the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile Ife, Osun State for allegedly demanding sex from a post-graduate student, Monica Osagie, has again set the social media on fire.

    While many applauded the university’s decision, others argued that the management should have handed the don over to law enforcement agents, for prosecution.

    The Vice Chancellor (VC), Prof Eyitope Ogunbodede, who announced Akindele’s sack noted that the Council took the decision after finding him culpable of the charges against him.

    Asked if the institution would move for Akindele’s prosecution, the VC answered “No”, adding that prosecution was not within its purview.

    His statement raised concerns on the legality of OAU’s action and the incidence of sexual harassment in universities generally.

    Some individuals, particularly students, who spoke to The Nation, noted that sexual harassment  had been around for ages. However, with the evolution of social media, they believed it was time the phenomenon was reduced.

    Govt deplores sexual

    harassment

    The Federal Government has asked universities to declare war on unwholesome practices, including sexual harassment, as it tarnishes the nation’s reputation.

    At the 29th and 30th combined convocation of the University of Jos, held at its permanent site, National Universities Commission (NUC) Executive Secretary Prof Rasheed Abubakar, who represented President Muhammadu Buhari, urged universities’ Governing Councils not to treat cases of sexual harassment with kid gloves.

    The President said the government would deal with any council that failed in this regard, urging them to demonstrate commitment to core values.

    “To play any major role in Nigeria’s social, economic, political and cultural transformation, however, all universities in the country must demonstrate commitment to the core values of honesty, integrity, transparency, accountability and rule of law,” said Abubakar.

    He added: “They must promote the culture of tolerance, accommodation and respect for other people’s cultures, religions and ways of life. They must stamp out all forms of academic and financial corruption, social vices including the worrying spate of sexual harassment which has continued to tarnish the cherished reputation of our nation’s citadels of learning.”

     

    Background

    Cases of sexual harassment in tertiary institutions often go unreported simply because the victims are afraid of being victimised; while a handful of cases that have so far been reported were either glossed over by the authority or not treated at all.

    Earlier in the month, The Nation reported a case of a bursar, who was sacked by the management of Shehu Idris College of Technology, Kaduna State for alleged sexual harassment. He  was later reinstated by the governing council, which found him not guilty, a development that sparked fresh outrage among students and members of the staff.

    Also last month, an alumnus of the university of Lagos (UNILAG) released semi-nude pictures of a professor in the university’s Faculty of Arts on social media, accusing the lecturer of sexually harassing female students in the department. The whistle-blower added that the professor’s habit was known to many of his colleagues, who looked the other way because of the cult-like nature of their operations.

    The university had since constituted a probe panel into the matter; but the VC, Prof Oluwatoyin Ogundipe, said the panel could get a clearer direction and investigation fast-tracked, only if the supposed victim could come out to testify.

    “If the lady does not come out, how will the investigation be concluded?  You must not hear from one side alone; you must hear from the two sides and balance the information you have gotten before taking decision and making recommendation,” Ogundipe said.

     

    From the legal lens

     

    A Professor of Law, UNILAG, Akin Oyebode, absolved OAU of any wrongdoing. “It is left for other agencies such as the police or ICPC (Independent Corrupt Practices Commission) to pick the man and charge him for ‘infamous conduct,” he noted.

    Oyebode, who is also the pioneer VC of Ekiti State University, said he once chaired the Ethics and Disciplinary Committee of UNILAG, adding that, at the time, he was inundated with sundry allegations ranging from sexual harassment, extortion, demand for bribes for marks and so on, some of which could not be substantiated.

    For any act of infamous conduct to be established, Oyebode insisted there has to be a complainant, while his or her allegation must be proved beyond every reasonable doubt.

    “If you don’t have a complainant, it is difficult to act. Even when there are allegations, they remain mere allegations until the person, who alleged, is able to prove beyond reasonable doubts.”

    Oyebode’s has an ally in another colleague Awa Kalu (SAN), who equally believed OAU had no business approaching any law enforcement agency, since the complainant did not deem it necessary to do so.

    “I was once a student of that university and I know there is a police station right inside campus where the victim would have lodged a complaint if she’s not yet satisfied with management’s decision.

    “Universities are established by statutes and OAU, therefore, lacks jurisdiction to deal with criminal offences. They have established Code of Conduct, and they must have revisited this code to establish culpability or otherwise of the accused.”

    Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of Council, UNILAG, Dr Wale Babalakin, said prosecution should follow once the law is breached.

    He said in an interview: “There must be zero tolerance for sexual harassment and any punishment meted out on anybody found sexually harassing students is appropriate. Bad behaviour must be punished. And harassing students is ultimate bad behaviour. There must be serious penalty for bad behaviour. It is failure to punish bad behaviour has cost us a lot in this nation So, I support what is being done, and really once the lecturer is disciplined, it is important that the university authorities investigates whether there are criminal issues involved. If there is a criminal issue involved, it must be prosecuted.”

    In contrast, a lawyer based in Ado-Ekiti, Mr. Adeoye Aribasoye, believes Akindele is liable for prosecution.

    Aribasoye said dismissal might not be enough if it was established that a crime known to law has been committed by the varsity don.

    The lawyer explained that although an offence such as “sex-for-mark” is unknown to law, the culprit can be charged with abuse of office.

    Aribasoye said: “It was established by the evidence gathered that there was an abuse of office, the sex-for-mark scandal is not known to law.

    “On the abuse of office, the professor is liable and he can be charged to court for abusing his office in his alleged relationship with that student,” he said.

    However, another lawyer, Fatade Sunday, agreed with Oyebode and Kalu.

    He said: “The victim in this matter chose to take her case back to the institution and not to any law enforcement agency. If the action (dismissal) of the Governing Council (of OAU) last week is within the purview of the law setting up the university, then you cannot blame the management of OAU for not handing over the matter the police.”

    Nevertheless, Fatade is aggrieved that there is a lacuna in the nation’s moral system, urging individuals to retrace their steps. “Nigeria’s problem will be solved when we begin to address our moral system and it begins from us as individuals.

    “Take this issue of OAU for instance, you might be shocked that instead of the people feeling for the victim, more empathy will be shifted towards the accused.

    “I am not saying that ladies too do not woo lecturers. But most of the unfortunate ones are not willing to speak out because they suffer in the end,” he added.

    We endorse fair

    process, says ASUU

    National President, Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) Prof Biodun Ogunyemi said the union would not kick against decisions against erring members, provided the process was fair.

    “As a union, ASUU will not stand in the way of justice if what is done is according to the extant laws and procedures of the institution,” he said.

    “We have always insisted on due process. When such a thing happen, we expect a committee to be set up, investigation thoroughly conducted while the accused is given fair hearing. This is because we believe in the Rule of Law,” he said.

    On how the union educates members against unethical conducts, Ogunyemi added: “We always use every available platform to remind ourselves of our responsibilities as loco parentis to these students.

    “We often remind ourselves that we are supposed to interact with them in a mutually-beneficial way because these students are the ones that will take over from us.

    “Finally, remember that every university has an  Ethics Committee, and we encourage our students to raise the alarm just in the event of any form of injustice against them.”

     

    Victim, others speak

    A member of the Concerned Parents and Educators Network, a Facebook education advocacy group, Mr  Solomon Sunday, likened OAU’s investigation to an orderly room trial.

    “If a police officer misuses his firearm and kills another person, he is first subjected to an orderly room trial. If he is found guilty, he is dismissed from service. Thereafter, he is sent to court for prosecution for murder. What OAU has done to the professor is an orderly room trial. A criminal proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction should follow,” he said.

    As a victim, a student of the University of Calabar (UNICAL), who did not wish to be named, praised Akindele’s dismissal. Having had a similar experience like Osagie, she said prosecution was in order.

    “I think it is a very welcome development that he has been sacked. Again, I agree that it is not enough. He has to be prosecuted. I feel strongly about this because I have been a victim of such a situation here at the University of Calabar, where I am a student. If he goes to prison, it would be a very good thing because it would make him pay for the torture he has been putting his female students through,” she said.

    However, beyond prosecution, institutions are being urged to strengthen the reporting framework so that students are not victimised and encouraged to raise the alarm without fear.

    The UNICAL student  said without such, lecturers would still not be deterred.

    “The  OAU lecturer is just unfortunate to have been caught, which I am still happy about, but it would not improve the situation. Here at UNICAL it is a big problem. It only means the lecturers will be more careful. You can imagine a lecturer will tell you to go and pay for a hotel room with your own money, so they will come and sleep with you there, else you will fail.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Revisiting Sexual Harassment Bill

    Let me be very clear on our position on this bill. This is a bill that must be passed into law. It is either we enact this law to send sexual predator lecturers to prison for correction according to law under the fine democratic tenets of the rule of law or we provoke helpless parents, husbands, or guardians to, some day, pick a loaded gun and deal with this problem in a barbaric manner. Therefore, we passionately urge the Senate to ensure that it does not by inaction impose the Hobbesian state of nature of a banana republic on victims of sexual harassment in our tertiary institutions and their relatives by provoking them to fight for themselves by all means possible, including outside the law!”

    – Comrade Idongesit Micah

    Apart from the Constitution Amendment Bill, the yearly Appropriation Bill and Petroleum Industry Bill, I do not immediately recall any other bill that is fundamental to the future of this country as the Sexual Harassment in Tertiary Educational Institutions (Prohibition) Bill, sponsored by Sen. Ovie Omo-Agege and 46 others. The proposed law has since been passed by the Senate and is now awaiting the concurrence of the House of Representatives.

    The Bill prohibits any form of sexual relationship between lecturers and their students and prescribes jail term of up to five years but not less than two years with no option of fine for lecturers who engage in sexual relationship with students.

    According to Omo-Agege, the Bill, among others, “makes it a criminal offence for any educator in a university, polytechnic or any other tertiary educational institution to violate or exploit the student-lecturer fiduciary relationship for sexual pleasures;  vice chancellors of universities, rectors of polytechnics and other chief executives of institutions of higher learning will go to jail for two years if they fail to act within a week on complaints of sexual harassment made by students; the Bill expressly allows sexually harassed students, their parents or guardians to seek civil remedies in damages against sexual predator lecturers before or after their successful criminal prosecution by the State.”

    In every chance discussion since the current Bill became public knowledge, almost everyone has one sorry story to tell, either about themselves, their friends, family members or acquaintances across the nation’s campuses. We are here not talking about some bad eggs, the usual escapist argument. All the eggs are bad except a few! And it is our responsibility to encourage those few dons that are nurturing a great future for Nigeria. This Bill, in a way, should boost the morale of such conscientious teachers.

    Lecturers in Nigeria have turned our campuses into individual fiefdoms where they reign and rule; they have become gods that must be appeased by our youths. Lecturers enjoy near absolute freedom which you don’t find in other workplaces.

    I have a friend at the University of Ibadan (UI). She’s chaste, hardworking and cerebrally endowed. She’s been on her Master’s programme for over three years now. The supervisor is always on the road or in the air and always too busy.

    “What does the professor supervisor want? Money, gift or what?” I asked.

    “Friendship!”

    “But she knows you’re married?”

    “Marriage! If you’re a spinster, they say that’s good, if you’re married, they say that’s better, and if you’re pregnant, then you are in the best condition!”

    “So the situation has sunk such deep?”

    “Some of them even tell female students to meet them in hotels, which the students must pay for… but it happens on all campuses.”

    “But why don’t you report or get another supervisor?”

    “You can’t be sure my brother, these people have a clique… And if you report, who are the people to sit in judgement? Their colleagues! So, I’m not bothered again because my hands are engaged anyway…”

    I have heard ASUU members argue, again and again, that no good student can be successfully victimized. It’s the most infantile argument I’ve ever heard (in the same mould as the current argument by ASUU that the Sexual Harassment Bill violates university autonomy – as if the police require any sanction of a varsity to investigate a crime or arrest a criminal within that university system!); in fact, scandalous because this is coming from university dons. Students are not equally endowed. There are A students as well as B, C and D. While it may, theoretically, be difficult to successfully victimize an A or B candidate, it is pretty easier to victimize a C or D student. Are the average students therefore not at the mercy of prurient lecturers? And what percentage of our varsity’s students are in A or B category? Certainly, a tiny percentage. But the reality on our campuses is that no student is immune from victimization. We’ve had cases where sadistic lecturers removed some pages of answer booklets and later blamed the candidates for the offence. Even an A student may be weak in a particular course and hence could only get a D. Can such a student not be victimized easily in the said course? The dissolute teachers have however become wiser; they fail you through their proxies so you may not lay any blame at their doorsteps. The conditions on campuses are clearly weighed against the (female) students.

    The argument by ASUU that the Bill is discriminatory because sexual harassment is not peculiar to tertiary institutions is equally not sustainable. In those other instances or places where you have this crime committed, they are generally among adults and fiduciary relationship is virtually non-existent. But on our campuses, our children are ranged against marauding fathers who hold the power to determine who or who does not graduate and when. The government puts these students in your care and pays you to teach them to become great asset to the country but you abuse them and turn them into liabilities to the society.

    Of course, I am very much aware of provocative dressing by some students. But if students lose their common sense, must their lecturers also lose their sense of value? Indecent dressing or not, once these randy dons set their eyes on certain students, they do not take ‘No’ for an answer and if you dare them, they or their licentious colleagues fire you with Ds, Es and Fs. That is the cult system higher education has been reduced to in the country. Having hit a stone wall, the students succumb and go in with their fathers’ mates in order to graduate at the right time.

    I recall the authorities of the University of Lagos approved a dress code for their students over a decade ago… I was once told of a disciplinarian lecturer at UI who would not condone indecent dressing.  Students (male and female) dressed well for his classes. Such a code could be revived in all tertiary institutions of learning because we are concerned with “learning” and “character”. Students must dress responsibly. They should conduct themselves as the pride of the nation, the reason for our hope in the future.

    I have no doubt the Bill will be passed by the National Assembly and President Muhammadu Buhari, the change agent, will sign it into law.

     

    • Soyombo, a public affairs commentator, sent this piece via densityshow@yahoo.com
  • Wike directs Tertiary Institutions to investigate lecturers involved in sexual harassment

    Wike directs Tertiary Institutions to investigate lecturers involved in sexual harassment

    Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Ezenwo Wike has directed  the governing councils and heads of State-Owned Tertiary Institutions to set up committees to investigate reported cases of sexual harassment and sorting against lecturers.

    This decision was reached after a meeting the Rivers State Governor held with the chairmen of the Governing Councils, Vice Chancellors, Rectors and Provosts of State-Owned Tertiary Institutions at the Government House Port Harcourt.

    Read Also;Wike, Amaechi convoy clash in Port Harcourt

    A statement by Simeon Nwakaudu, Special Assistant to the Rivers State Governor on Electronic Media noted that the institutions  involved include: Rivers State University, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Kenule Beeson Saro-Wiwa Polytechnic, Bori, Captain Elechi Amadi Polytechnic, Port Harcourt, Rivers State College of Health Science and  Technology and Rivers State School of Nursing.

    The Statement added that all the affected institutions  are expected to report back to the governor on the outcome  of their investigations.

     

  • Celebs wear black to protest sexual harassment at Golden Globes

    Celebs wear black to protest sexual harassment at Golden Globes

    With the ongoing reports on sexual harassment, which have had many popular faces emerged to share their stories, the just concluded golden Globes Awards held on Sunday, held history as celebrities stormed the red carpets with black sophisticated gowns to show their support against sexual harassment.

    Known for celebrating the best in film and television, this year’s Golden Globe Awards was dominated by one topic: sexual harassment against women.

    Various celebrities arrived at the event on Sunday wearing black in a show of solidarity against the culture of sexual misconduct in the entertainment industry, with several men donning pins in support of the “Time’s Up” initiative.

    First-time host Seth Meyers told the audience as he opened Sunday’s show in Los Angeles, “It’s 2018: marijuana is finally allowed, and sexual harassment finally isn’t,” the NBC “Late Night” host said to applause.

    Capping off the evening as she introduced the night’s biggest prize, the award for Best Motion Picture Drama, singer and actress Barbara Streisand delivered a stirring message to the celebrity-packed room.

    “I’m very proud to stand in the room with people who speak out against gender inequality, sexual harassment, and the pettiness that has poisoned our politics,” she said.

    “I’m proud that our industry, faced with uncomfortable truths, has vowed to change the way we do business.

    Film producer Harvey Weinstein, actor Kevin Spacey and comedian Louis C.K. were just some of the prominent entertainment figures to face allegations of sexual harassment, assault or misconduct last year in a wave of accusations that swept through Hollywood and prompted the #MeToo movement.

    Several winners used their acceptance speeches to address the hot-button issue.

    “For too long, women have not been heard or believed if they dared to speak their truth to the power of those men. But their time is up,” Oprah Winfrey declared as she accepted the prestigious Cecil B. DeMille Award. “Their time is up!” Winfrey said to a standing ovation.

    Laura Dern, Best Supporting Actress winner for HBO’s “Big Little Lies,” said: “Many of us were taught not to tattle. It was a culture of silence and that was normalized.”

    “I urge all of us to not only support survivors and bystanders who are brave enough to tell their truth, but to promote restorative justice. May we also please protect and employ them. May we teach our children that speaking out without the fear of retribution is our culture’s new north star,” Dern said during an emotional speech.

    Nicole Kidman, who also picked up a Golden Globe for her role in “Big Little Lies,” told the audience: “I do believe and I hope we can elicit change through the stories we tell and the way we tell them. Let’s keep the conversation alive.”

    “Handmaid’s Tale” actress Elisabeth Moss, who won in the Best Actress in a TV Drama category, quoted the author of the book that inspired the apocalyptic Hulu series.

    Afterward, she said: “Margaret Atwood this is for you and all the women who came before you and after you, who were brave enough to speak out against intolerance and injustice, and to fight for equality and freedom in this world.”

    Last week, a bevy of A-list actresses — including Reese Witherspoon, Ashley Judd and Natalie Portman, among others — writers and female entertainment execs announced the creation of “Time’s Up,” an initiative aimed at combating systemic sexual harassment.

    Many actors and actresses also participated in a sartorial show of force at the awards ceremony, opting to wear black in support of “Time’s Up,” and as form of silent protest against sexual harassment in Hollywood and beyond.

    Another highlight of the night was the profound speech, of the world’s most influential woman Oprah Winfrey; the media mogul’s acceptance of the career honor defined the evening more assuredly than Seth Meyers’ able if understated performance as host, or any other moment in the three-hour, eight-minute broadcast.

    Thundering through a speech that cut through the perfume of self-congratulation and social justice-as-accessorizing, Winfrey hit the pause button to remind the audience just how much work still needs to be done. She acknowledged the awe-inspiring power inherent to standing on that stage, describing how she felt at seeing Sidney Poitier accept such recognition so many years ago. Without pretentiousness, she recognized what seeing her occupy that same rare air meant to younger women determined to take their shot in a world that long has stacked the deck against them.

    Then Winfrey used her power to invoke the name of a black woman unknown to most: the main subject of the 2017 documentary “The Rape of Recy Taylor.” Briefly recounting the story of her case, Winfrey explained that in 1944 Taylor was walking home from a church service when she was abducted by six armed white men, raped, and left by the side of the road.

    Through the NAACP and the efforts of Rosa Parks, Taylor sought justice that was denied her but, Winfrey revealed, she died 10 days ago, shortly before her 98th birthday.

    “She lived, as we have lived, too many years in a culture broken by brutally powerful men,” Winfrey said. “For too long women have not been heard or believed if they dared to speak their truth to the power of those men. But their time is up. Their time is up.”

    Has the Globes ever been capable of genuinely moving viewers to tears? If so, it’s been a long while. Expecting Winfrey to deliver a rousing oration is reasonable, but the level of emotional release sparked by her words felt unprecedented and necessary. Entertainment industry visibility has been crucial to maintaining the momentum of #MeToo and keeping the conversation about gender inequity alive and top-of-mind, but Winfrey employed her singular talent for bridging privilege and fame to everyday people, cementing the night’s efforts as something more than simply fashion. Her gratitude at the honor bestowed upon her was exceeded only by her honest deference to the labors of all women who quietly keep going while enduring abuse, “because they, like my mother, had children to feed and bills to pay and dreams to pursue.”

    It was entirely in line with an evening that balanced the completely expected with a few moments that were refreshingly unpredictable, starting with the symbolic sartorial blackout for the Globes red carpet and ending with Natalie Portman’s sucker punch to the nards in the wake of Winfrey’s speech. As if she knew people wondered how anyone could follow that tour de force, Portman introduced the Best Director category at Ron Howard’s side by way of brightly stating, “And here are the all-male nominees!” with wicked precision. “The Shape of Water” director Guillermo Del Toro won the category this year, but Portman won the sisterhood for the foreseeable future.

    That also means Winfrey was the only woman of color to go home last night with an individual honor from the HFPA.

    Sunday night’s telecast of the awards exemplified everything great and awkward about the industry’s highly publicized efforts to confront the surge of sexual harassment scandal and embrace the age of #MeToo.

    As planned and well-publicized, the pre-show couture parade of black gowns, many relatively demure in comparison to past showings, provided a respectable show of solidarity with the embattled women of the world.

    Social media captured it under the umbrella of #WhyWeWearBlack, part of supporting the recently established ‘Time’s Up initiative’, a celebrity-backed effort dedicated to confronting abuse of power and promoting equality in the workplace.

    Several nominees brought activists as guests, notably Meryl Streep, who walked the carpet the director of the National Domestic Workers Alliance, Ai-jen Poo, and Michelle Williams, who was joined by #MeToo founder and civil rights activist Tarana Burke.