Tag: Sharia

  • Advocate urges removal of Sharia provisions from constitution

    Advocate urges removal of Sharia provisions from constitution

    A human rights advocate and President of One Nation One Law, Benson Sunday, has called for the removal of Sharia provisions from Nigeria’s Constitution, warning that religious politics and conflicting legal frameworks are weakening the country’s fight against terrorism and insecurity.

    Sunday said Nigeria’s greatest danger was not only terrorism, but the contradictions, mixed messages and political compromises that have eroded national resolve in confronting violent threats.

    He urged the federal government to adopt a modern, unified security doctrine and abolish parallel legal systems, which he said threaten national cohesion and effective law enforcement.

    The activist challenged traditional and religious leaders, including the Sultan of Sokoto, to demonstrate moral clarity in times of national crisis.

    “With great authority comes great responsibility. When insecurity rages, no leader — religious or traditional — can afford ambiguity. The nation is watching every voice that shapes our moral landscape,” he said.

    Reiterating his demand for a secular and unified legal framework, Sunday said Nigeria could not build a strong, united country on divided laws.

    “Religion belongs in the soul. Law belongs to the nation. A united, thriving country cannot have divided laws,” he said.

    He criticised religious groups that opposed Nigeria’s proposed security cooperation with Israel, an initiative earlier advanced by Deputy Foreign Minister Bianca Ojukwu, describing the resistance as a setback to efforts to modernise the country’s security architecture.

    According to him, Israel’s global reputation in intelligence, counter-terrorism, hostage rescue and advanced security technology made the proposed partnership a strategic opportunity Nigeria failed to fully harness due to internal resistance.

    “This proposal represented a chance for Nigeria to modernise its security architecture. Instead, public pushback from some clerics and groups weakened political courage and slowed reforms that could have saved lives,” he said.

    Sunday accused those who opposed past reforms of lacking moral standing to champion security today.

    He urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to lead with transparency and decisive action, calling for the publication of the names of terror financiers and their enablers.

    He also called for the revival of security cooperation with Israel, the United States and other allied nations, and for the empowerment of Nigeria’s security leadership, including the Chief of Defence Staff, General Christopher Musa, and Deputy Minister Bianca Ojukwu, to build what he described as the strongest anti-terror network in West Africa.

    “No president is endangered by telling the truth. The nation will defend any leader who chooses transparency over silence,” he said.

    He advised Nigerians to reject secrecy, extremism and divided legal systems in the fight against terrorism, insisting that titles and status should not shield poor decisions.

    “From Zamfara to Benue, Borno to Kaduna, the blood of innocent Nigerians cries, not for charity, but for justice. A nation divided by law cannot unite against terror,” Sunday said.

  • Why Sharia law is facing resistance in Southern Nigeria, by don

    Why Sharia law is facing resistance in Southern Nigeria, by don

    • Says law not synonymous with punishment

    A former Head of Islamic Law Department, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Prof AbdulRazzaq Alaro, has said the reason the adoption and implementation of Sharia law is facing stiff opposition and resistance in the Southern part of Nigeria is because people take Sharia as synonymous with punishment.

    Alaro who described Sharia as one of the most misunderstood terms in the region said, to the average Southerner, the term means punishment, a misconception which he said has given birth to a myth or long time wrong notion that Sharia is all about punishment.

    He made the assertion in his lecture entitled: “Sharia beyond the Criminal justice system: clarifying the myth and misconceptions scrounging the application of Sharia law in Nigeria”, delivered at the 2025 Annual Ramadan Lecture of the Muslim Lawyers’ Association of Nigeria (MULAN), Oyo State Branch.

    The guest lecturer who made reference to the Yoruba speaking community of the Southwest who use ‘seria’, a term loosely derived from Sharia in the local pallance to mean punishment, said anytime the issue of application of Sharia law in Nigeria comes up for implementation or discussion, it is met with stiff resistance.

    Read Also: FG moves to unlock financing for local ship owners

    He added that it was even more worrisome that in recent times, the discussion about application of Sharia received the same old and unwelcoming resistance not only from non-muslims, but even from those he described as uninformed Muslims.

    He commended MULAN for taking the step of choosing the topic for the lecture, as well as a plans to follow it up by legal and strategic planning to ensure the application if Sharia in Oyo State becomes a reality.

    The guest lecturer clarifies that Sharia, linguistically and technically, is not synonymous to punishment, rather a complete system of law primarily derived from Quran and Sunnah.

  • Misconceptions about Sharia law fuel opposition in southern Nigeria – Prof. Alaro

    Misconceptions about Sharia law fuel opposition in southern Nigeria – Prof. Alaro

    A former Head of the Islamic Law Department, University of Ilorin, Professor AbdulRazzaq Alaro, has attributed the stiff opposition to the adoption and implementation of Sharia law in Southern Nigeria to widespread misconceptions, particularly the belief that Sharia is synonymous with punishment.

    Speaking at the 2025 Annual Ramadan Lecture of the Muslim Lawyers’ Association of Nigeria (MULAN), Oyo state branch, Alaro described Sharia as one of the most misunderstood concepts in the region.

    He noted that for many Southerners, the term evokes images of severe punishments, a misconception that has fueled long-standing resistance.

    Delivering a lecture titled: “Sharia Beyond the Criminal Justice System: Clarifying the Myth and Misconceptions Surrounding Its Application in Nigeria,” Alaro pointed out that even among the Yoruba-speaking communities, the term “Seria” is often used in local parlance to mean punishment.

    He stated that this linguistic association has contributed to the negative perception of Sharia law whenever discussions about its implementation arise.

    According to Alaro, resistance to Sharia law is not only from non-Muslims but also from uninformed Muslims, which he finds even more troubling.

    He commended MULAN for selecting the topic for discussion and for its plans to pursue legal and strategic measures to advocate for the application of Sharia in Oyo State.

    He clarified that Sharia is not merely a system of punishment but a comprehensive legal framework derived from the Qur’an and Sunnah, similar to Common Law and Customary Law.

    He emphasised that Sharia law predates Nigeria’s formation as a sovereign state and has historically played a significant role in the legal systems of various regions.

    Alaro stressed that Sharia’s criminal justice system is primarily focused on deterrence rather than punishment, debunking the notion that it is solely about capital punishment or amputation.

    He said “Apart from the Criminal justice system, Sharia has other branches of laws including public and private laws, business and commercial laws, municipal and international laws as well as substantive and procedural laws.

    “In specifics, Sharia has laws relating to family relationship otherwise known as Personal law, law of financial transactions such as laws of contract, commercially law, company law, property law, banking law and insurance law.

    “It also encompasses laws relating to civil wrong suchbas thenlaws of tort, environmental law, and laws relating to regulation of resources such as land law, oil and gas law.

    “Equally, Sharia encompasses laws relating to governance such as constitutional Las and administrative law. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that Sharia laws and principles cover all branches of laws known to mankind in the past, present and one’s that are not presently known but which maybbe unraveled in the future.”

    He added that Sharia law is capable of addressing all challenges as a people and also enhance justice in the society if well implemented.

    Read Also: Minister mourns former APRA secretary’s passing Dangogo

    He cited the example of the use of fund from the Islamic bank and sukuk in particular, saying, “Sharia has provided for us a viable alternative to the interest based system in the areas of public project funding. A total of 124 road projects covering over 5,820 kilometers across the six geopolitical zones have been developed through sukuk since 2017. Yet, Nigeria remains a multi-religious country and was never islamised.”

    He lamented that the unfounded fear of islamization agenda each time Muslims demand for their legitimate right has been exposed to be no more than a ruse wickedly devised to sustain the systematic deprivation of Nigerians Muslims of their fundamental rights as citizens.

    He however cautioned that Sharia should be seen beyond its criminal justice system, noting thatnitbisna complete legal system that has many other branches of law which are capable of complementing the existing legal systems in several aspects of the law.

    “The legal system is capable of offering justice that satisfies the conscious amd religious dictates of the Nigerian populace in line with citizens fundamental right to freedom of religion and conscience “, he added.

    Earlier in his remarks, the Chairman, Ramadan Palnning Committee, Akeem Agbaje said the topic was choosing after it was observed that Sharia has become a very sensitive topic which is assuming a dangerous dimension as people are gradually becoming aggressive about it.

    Agbaje said, “We observed that Sharia is a very sensitive topic in our society. We also observed that it was assuming a dangerous dimension.

    “People were being aggressive about it. Even though what they were proposing was an abdication panel, we felt that it was important that we should enlighten both Muslims and non-Muslims about the Sharia. Because the concern about Sharia is not restricted to Christians.

    “Even some Muslims are showing concern about the Sharia. So we believe there should be a process that enlightens everybody about what Sharia is all about. We know that the popular part of Sharia is the criminal justice part of it.

    “But Sharia is beyond criminal law. It covers every aspect of the private Muslim law like banking, matrimonial matters, inheritance. So it’s important that we begin to educate or enlighten our people.”

    He said the fear or apprehension about Sharia is more dominant in the minds of the leaders which has made several effort at changing the wrong orientation about it futile.

    He appealed to non-Muslims to eschew their fears about Sharia, noting that if people have inter religious marriages without fears, there should not be any about the religious laws of Muslims, noting that the introduction of some parts ofbthe Sharia law such as Islamic banking has been beneficial to all and sundry irrespective of religious beliefs.

    The event also featured a panel session where members gave their diverse views about various benefits that the implementation of Sharia law holds for the society at large.

  • Needless uproar over Sharia in Southwest

    Needless uproar over Sharia in Southwest

    The Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) completely misread the apprehensions of the Southwest over the attempt by some individuals in Oyo and Ekiti States to establish Independent Sharia (Arbitration) Panels or Sharia Courts. The apprehensions are well grounded, and it is not surprising that NSCIA can’t seem to grasp that probably the most secular region in Nigeria wants more secularism rather than any genuflection to anything that proposes more religion. There is no judicial system that is intrinsically unqualified to mediate disagreements and conflicts, but in a country where religion has become so badly politicised and even weaponised, and at a time when the country is immersed in unending insurgencies, some of them inspired by religious fanatics, it is unhelpful to accentuate religious differences.

    Read Also: How to report loan apps harassment, by FCCPC

    Contrary to the impression the NSCIA gave in its public statement of January 29, the groups advocating judicial status quo in the Southwest are a mix of Christians, Muslims and other indigenous religions. They remember how in the name of Islam, the traditional authorities in Ilorin, Kwara State, attempted to unconstitutionally suffocate indigenous religious worship and observances. They also recall and indeed worry that Sharia courts and panels in the North have been unable to stanch the flow of blood in that region, let alone promote tolerance for other religious practices. When it comes to intolerance, the Southwest advocates for secularism allege that the North appears to be the guiltiest.

    After decades of bloodletting in different parts of the world, everyone yearns for more inclusiveness, tolerance and secularism, not the birthing of more religious organs. When about 12 northern states opted for Sharia law during the Olusegun Obasanjo years, beginning with Zamfara State, few expected that the region would become convulsed with mayhem. The Southwest is right to be apprehensive. That apprehension is neither intolerant nor discriminatory; it is instead precautionary. Better not go down a slippery road whose gradient and culmination are unpredictable, especially in a region that continues to remain the enviable bastion of peaceful, harmonious and inclusive living in Nigeria.

  • No group can bring Sharia through backdoor, says Abiodun

    No group can bring Sharia through backdoor, says Abiodun

    Ogun State Government has warned against any attempt to establish a Sharia Court in the state.

    The government, in a statement signed by Governor Dapo Abiodun, said Sharia Courts could not be legally constituted by individuals or groups without legal backing.

    The government was reacting to a notice announcing the launch of a Sharia Court in the state.

    The statement said Ogun State only recognised courts established through the legal framework of the Nigerian Constitution, adding that a Sharia Court did not form part of the legal framework operating in the state.

    It reads: “Ogun State Government has noted the circulation of a digital notice announcing the launch of a Sharia Court in Ogun State.

    Read Also: Police probing 179 suspects laundering of N11b, says spokesman

    “No Sharia Court is authorised to operate within Ogun State. The courts that are legally empowered to adjudicate disputes arising within Ogun State are those established by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria or by state laws, which are: Magistrates’ Courts, High Court, Customary Courts, Customary Court of Appeal, Federal High Court, National Industrial Court, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court.

    “No law operating in Ogun State has established a Sharia Court, and Sharia law does not form part of the legal framework by which Ogun State Government administers and governs society.

    “Ogun State Government upholds and protects the rights of individuals to practise the religion of their choice, or to subscribe to no religion, and recognises the freedom of individuals to apply their faith in their personal and private matters.

    “However, this freedom does not extend to the formation of unauthorised assemblies or institutions. No individual or group is legally permitted to constitute a court or present themselves to the public as a court without legal backing. Those behind that notice have no legal backing. They cannot set up a court or administer justice by fiat or public notice.

  • Protest rocks Ekiti over inauguration of Sharia panel

    Protest rocks Ekiti over inauguration of Sharia panel

    Controversy has trailed the inauguration of Independent Shari’ah Arbitration Panel in Ekiti State, with groups and individuals opposing the move.

    A group, the Yoruba Regional Alliance Worldwide, in collaboration with other Yoruba self-determination organisations, yesterday staged a peaceful protest in Ado-Ekiti, condemning the inauguration of the panel.

    The protesters carried placards with inscriptions such as “No to Sharia in Yorubaland”, “Sharia will cause war” and “Sharia is a constitutional blunder”, among others.

    However, they were prevented from moving round the streets as planned by the police, in order to avoid possible crisis.

    Read Also: $360m Ogoni cleanup: Senate gives HYPREP’s boss seven days to appear or risk arrest

    Addressing reporters, the leader of the Yoruba Regional Alliance Worldwide, Mr Opeoluwa Akinola, alleged that the introduction of Sharia law in Yorubaland was an attempt to cause chaos and disharmony.

    He said Yoruba people, irrespective of their religions, had co-existed peacefully for generations without the Sharia Penal Code, wondering what the Sharia Law introduction would achieve that the existing penal codes and legal systems in Yoruba land could not.

    Akinola said: “We reject and condemn the proposed inauguration, while calling on Ekiti State Government and relevant authorities to forestall the impending catastrophe by immediately putting a stop to any further preparation by the Supreme Council for Shari’ah in Nigeria to inaugurate the Sharia panel in Ekiti State and in any other part of Yoruba land.

    “What positive advantage has Sharia contributed to the economy and well-being of the indigenes of the states where it has been practised?  The affected states are still being overwhelmed with poverty, out of school children, insecurity and child molestation.

    “We call on Yoruba Muslim organisations, Christian associations, ‘Isese’ and other ‘Ibile’ traditional worshipers and Ifa adherents to come out in condemnation of the move, as they want to cause a schism in the age old harmonious relationships among our people in Yoruba land.’’

  • Sanusi advocates Sharia punishment for rustlers

    •Police parade 74 suspects

    The Emir of Kano, Muhammad Sanusi 11, has said Islamic laws should be used to prosecute cattle rustlers.

    He added that the punishments meted out to them should include amputation of hands and legs, killing, piercing of body with sticks, life imprisonment and banishment to exile.

    The monarch spoke yesterday when the police command paraded 74 suspected cattle rustlers with 818 cows and 87 sheep.

    The animals were recovered in the last 30 days.

    The bush combing at the Falgore game reserve by a special squad was constituted by Police Commissioner Muhammad Musa Katsina.

    Parading the suspects and the animals before Governor Abdullahi Umar Ganduje and Emir Sanusi 11, at Kanar Dawaki in Dawaki Kudu Local Government, Katsina said three of the notorious rustlers were killed in a gun duel and a police officer was injured, hospitalised, but had been discharged.

    He said the police recovered arms, adding that some of the suspects were nabbed in police and army camouflage, which they used to rob Fulani herdsmen.

    The police boss said: “Notable among the suspects was Umaru Dogo Ndaiye, a Senegalese, who was shot during a gun battle with our men, who were on a special duty at the Falgore forest, near Gazobi village. He died while receiving treatment in hospital.

    “A pistol and 224 cattle were recovered from him. Four members of his gang were arrested. Other rustlers, who died during the gun duel, were Datti Umar Rodi and Mammadu Dogo.”

    According to him, the police recovered 21 arms, 42 AK 47 ammunition, 15 9.mm ammunition, 28 live cartridges and 12 locally- made AK 47 ammunition.

    He said 82 suspected drug dealers and cult members were apprehended, while 21 parcels of 464 wraps of Indian hemp were recovered. Katsina added that 416 cartons of Tramadol, 119 sachets of Diazepam, 101 cartons of Parklin and Codeine syrup, five gallons of suck-and-die, including two tricycles used in conveying drugs by couriers were also displayed.

    Governor Ganduje described the activities of rustlers as worrisome, saying: “This is happening when we are yet to solve insurgency.”

    Ganduje, who was pained that of the 818 rustlers, who were arrested, some of them were Fulani, urged security agencies to ensure that they were prosecuted, assuring them of government’s support.

    He said a committee had been constituted to ensure that the recovered livestock were returned to their owners, adding that those involved in rustling should realise that their days were numbered.

  • ‘Boko Haram is all about Sharia’

    ‘Boko Haram is all about Sharia’

    Fred Agbeyegbe is a renowned lawyer, human rights activist and a foremost member of the defunct National Democratic Coalition (NADECO). He is also a playwright. In this interview with Edozie Udeze, he tackles many national issues bordering on the corporate existence of Nigeria and why religion and oil will continue to dominate national focus in the country.

     

    At 78, and in retrospect, would you say that most of the social ills you attacked in your plays such as The King Must Dance Naked have been solved?

    Of course not. They’ve not been achieved. To achieve those things, we need a change of mind on the part of the leaders of Nigeria. The people who rule us in this country – they are called all sorts of names, the elites and so on and so forth. For me, elitism in Nigeria is fake. The people who go into politics in Nigeria are not the elites. The elites are in fact far removed from government administration. They are the people who have been frustrated out of their minds because all the thinking they have to better the lives of Nigerians are not allowed. This is due to the usurpation of the political space by those who call themselves politicians.

    You mentioned NADECO and then paused. You played a major role in that group; how do you think the coalition fared in achieving democracy for Nigeria?

    Well, maybe I should put the question back to you. I was part of it. Do you think NADECO did the right thing to achieve democracy for us or to remove the military from government? I will say they did. NADECO did well. Ah, maybe NADECO did not do the right thing. The only thing we’ve been accused of most of the time now is that we brought out the modalities to ensure that we have a good country. But when it comes to actually taking over government, we either shied away or ran away.

    Maybe we cannot now complain from what we are seeing because of that, people feel we should have stayed to put the real government in place. Well, it depends on how you look at it. We were not canvassing to become governors and presidents or whatever. We were just simply saying you cannot have the country the way it was, and we are still thinking even now that you cannot have a country as it is now.

    Yes, the military is gone. There is no more (Gen. Sani) Abacha and so on. But I don’t think things are much different from what we had before now. The situation, to me has not changed much and that is why we feel we would have done much more thereafter.

    You are from the Niger Delta. How do you assess the situation there where thugs and kidnappers hold sway in a democratic environment?

    Well, I don’t know if you are correct by suggesting that that is what the youths are doing – the thugs, the kidnappers, the hoodlums of this country, all come from the Niger Delta. Far from it, in fact, the issue of insecurity you are talking about never started from the Niger Delta. No. The truth about the Niger Delta is that we were being oppressed. And even now, we are still being oppressed. Never mind that somebody from the Niger Delta is the head of the Nigerian government.

    The rules Jonathan is operating – the constitution he swore to uphold was not written by Niger Deltans. And nobody consulted any member of this society before the rules were put in place, not to talk of the Niger Delta. So, he is not doing what the Niger Delta people asked him to do. He is doing his own.

    What the Niger Delta people are saying is that you came to our backyard, you dug the place, pollute the air, give us ill-health, and then take the thing and go share it somewhere else… Now you come back to give us crump from the table. And we say that is not acceptable to us. Then they came with what they called amnesty. Maybe they don’t know the meaning of the word amnesty. Amnesty has a specific meaning either in English or in the dictionary or in law or in whatever. What the Niger Delta people were doing does not need amnesty. The fact that they have accepted it like that is just to make peace.

    So, for you the amnesty thing is not right?

    Of course, it was never right. What has it achieved? Have the people of Niger Delta got what they wanted? Have they? I ask you. What they set out to get with the struggle has it ended? Don’t you read what Asari Dokubo says every day? Does he not make sense to you? So, often, you ask yourself, what has the government done? Jonathan is in Aso Rock, so what? Is that what the people were fighting for?

    But the amnesty is said to be one of the reasons we have Boko Haram today?

    (Laughing) Ah, ah, well, they have to say something. They have to! Did Niger Delta people talk about religion? Do you do this because of what? What is the real reason for what Boko Haram is doing compared to the reason Niger Delta began what they did? How are the people being oppressed, that will bring about Boko Haram? What sort of injustice has been meted out in this country to the Northerners that will bring Boko Haram? How do you compare the two situations that will make them to do what they are doing? Nothing.

    So, what sort of political rubbish is that? Didn’t you hear what the Sultan of Sokoto said recently concerning the Boko Haram menace? That all the problems of the North came from the North and created by Northerners! Don’t listen to any excuse because I say don’t come and pollute my backyard. Don’t come and cause me health problems. Don’t come and take our God-given resource under the soil. And then Boko Haram people are annoyed. Why should they?

    In fact, as far as I am concerned all of us are misreading what the Boko Haram people are asking for. They are saying that they are the sovereign people and owners of their land where they stay. And they want to practice Sharia laws and nobody in this world can stop them. It doesn’t matter how many constitutions you make; they want a Sharia state for themselves and probably for the nation.

    And they have been practising Sharia laws a long time ago. The Northern states had Sharia laws, cutting off people’s limbs for offending their laws. Nobody has stopped them from doing it. Keep your Sharia laws to yourself because I am not a Muslim. Don’t come and operate it in my area. In fairness to them, they are not even saying they want to come and operate it in my area. They are saying leave my area alone for me. I want to have it alone and I want to practise Sharia Law.

    Then shouldn’t we say also say leave my Niger Delta to me? Don’t touch my oil or pollute my air or inflict health problem on me? These are the issues and we have to get them right.

    What is your stand on the 1999 Constitution?

    In the first place, we have no constitution. As long as what we have as a constitution was concocted by the military, it will not serve the desired purpose for a democratic society. The constitution we have today is far from being a perfect document to govern the nation well.

    It is a military document. And with that, you cannot genuinely practice democracy. They did it in an attempt to continue to lord it over all Nigerians. Well, we are a long way from perfection. What is the nature of the judiciary? It is not everything that happens in the judiciary that you can call the dispensing of justice.

    So, what is the constitution when people’s rights cannot be adequately protected or guaranteed? No matter the nature of the constitution you give to this country, so long as the Nigerian factor is there, we’ll never make progress. If you like bring a Togolese or Ghanaian to come over here to rule.

    As it is now, the National Assembly itself has no power to make the constitution. They have not been given the power to do so. All aspects of that 1999 Constitution are not only concocted, but a forgery. And any document that tells lies about itself does not stand. It is a forgery. At least from the little law that I know, that is the true situation. So then, the nation itself is run on the basis of forgery.

    Even the power to review the constitution doesn’t belong to the National Assembly. They cannot even be given the power to review it by anybody. That is the much I can say about that.

    Now, the federal government has decided to send troops to Mali to help quell the insurgency there. What is your take on this?

    That is international politics as far as I am concerned. You might argue and say they have not been able to take care of insecurity under their nose, then why are they going to save other people? But there are some valid points in saying that these things have a domino effect. If one place is likely to carry on as they do in Mali now and no one intervenes, more will come up sooner or later. The issue of contiguity are also involved in this matter.

    So, the policy of the federal government is that they want to contain it before it gets to our shores. I cannot fault them that.

    Now, let’s go to your artistic involvements. When you started Ajo Productions in 1983, what did you really have in mind?

    Ajo Productions is my theatre ensemble. It was established in 1983 to put up plays written by me on stage. And that is what we have been doing ever since. We also have what we call Lagos Theatre Associates. It is a collaboration outfit with Ajo Productions to do a lot of things. While Ajo Productions is a theatre group meant to put up plays by professional theatre actors and practitioners, Lagos Theatre Associates is an attempt to ensure that plays are always on stage. And you can immediately know the implications of that. Being always on stage means that there should continually be entertainment for the working people of Nigeria, who, after their tired week can relax. It means that the opportunity will be provided for the theatre or the actors to comment continuously on what is going on in the society.

    It means that there will always be employment for actors and actresses. So, it means that there will be attention all the time to art education. So, when you put all that together, it is a social service that Lagos Theatre Associates are rendering.

    How do you combine theatre and your law practice?

    (Laughs) Well, the theatre thing; I never went to any formal school to train as an artiste or as a playwright. So you have to ask the good Lord where that gift came from. The prowess with which I have been endowed, I am not the one to determine it and so I am carrying on with it. But I have been writing ever since I can remember and I enjoy every bit of it. So far, I have over eight plays to my credit.

    On the law side, it is my profession and I am still there. And I so believe in it that my children – two of them, are also lawyers. I have a grandchild who is equally a lawyer. So, I think that is enough commitment.

    What level in life has theatre taken you to?

    Well, I am sitting on top of the world. My plays are being distributed all over the world. It is on Amazon and so on and so forth. And I am sure you know that at the last Olympics, The King Must Dance Naked was one of the official plays staged in England.

    So far, I can never stop writing plays. At least I have six in the works now. And we just pray for long life so we can continue to write more plays.

    Do you hope to put them into movies someday?

    You see, that is the problem with this country. I shouldn’t be the one to do that. People should be interested in what other people do. But who knows, maybe when I find the money, I can do that.

    There is no theatre in Nigeria because the government who should be providing the infrastructure does not care. The government is not prepared to invest in theatre.

     

  • ‘Forget Sharia, if  you want dialogue’

    ‘Forget Sharia, if you want dialogue’

    Former Military Governor of Kaduna State Col. Abubakar Umar (rtd) spoke with Assistant Editor GBADE OGUNWALE on the Boko Haram crises in the North and how the Federal Government can reposition the polity by fighting corruption and mass unemployment.

     

    Former Military Governor of Kaduna State Col. Abubakar Umar (rtd) has told leaders and members of the Boko Haram sect to forget their demand for Sharia in the North, if they are serious about talks with the Federal Government.

    But Col. Umar advises the Federal Government to show commitment in the fight against corruption and unemployment – if indeed the government is sincere in its quest to end the insecurity in the land.

    In a telephone interview with our correspondent at the weekend, Col. Umar blamed both the Federal Government and Boko Haram (western education is a sin) for the strings of deaths and destruction of property brought about by the bombings across many states in the North, particularly in the Northeastern.

    According to the radical former military governor, it will be futile for Boko Haram to insist on Islamisation of any part of the North as the sect has often demanded as one of its conditions for peace.

    He reminded the sect’s members of the secularity of the Nigerian state as enshrined in the constitution, stressing that there is no state in the North that does not have its own fair share of indigenous Christian and Moslem population.

    Col. Umar said: “They should not forget that the constitution says Nigeria is a secular state. That means we cannot run the country as a theocracy; otherwise, we cannot remain as one.

    “They should also know that the North is neither a purely Islamic territory nor a Christian territory. So, if they are seeking to impose Sharia on any part of the country as a condition for dialogue, it will never work.

    “Let them imagine what Nigeria will be like, if every religious organisation seeks to impose its own doctrine on any part of the country. If that happens, then we can no longer remain as one country. Northern Nigeria cannot be cut off from the rest.

    “So, if the institutionalisation of Sharia in the North is one of the conditions the leaders of Boko Haram are projecting for dialogue, then they should perish the thought because that is not achievable.”

    The retired soldier similarly faulted claims by members of the Boko Haram that their bombing escapades are meant to avenge the killing of their leader, the late Mohammed Yusuf, who was extra judicially eliminated in captivity by security agents in 2009.

    He called on the sect’s members to make a conservative estimate of the number of people they have killed in their quest for vengeance on the death of Yusuf, saying the “frightening” number of casualties from their bombings is enough for them to stop the killings.

    “Can they count the number of innocent people they have killed in the course of avenging the killing of Mohammed Yusuf? They should know that this country has witnessed so much bloodshed and instability on account of their activities.

    So, if they don’t ceasefire, then, what in the name of Allah, do they want to achieve?”

    Col. Umar reminded the sect that the elimination of Yusuf was carried out under the late President Umaru Yar’Adua and not under President Goodluck Jonathan, who the sect has vowed to fight to the finish.

    Col. Umar urged the Federal Government to address the hydra headed challenges confronting the nation in the most critical sectors of the economy and the polity.

    He identified corruption and unemployment as the two dangerous monsters that must be tamed for any dialogue to be meaningful and for the country to enjoy relative stability.

    To him, the Federal Government’s approach to the anti-corruption war and job creation is insincere in the approach has thrown up a situation where about 80 per cent of the population live below the poverty line, he said.

    Col. Umar lamented a situation where public servants and politicians conspire to loot the treasury, thereby depriving a teeming population of the nation’s youths the opportunities for gainful employment.

    “There is an urgent need for the Federal Government to address the terrible economic situation in which about 80 percent of the population live below the poverty line.

    “For now, there is total shutdown on employment. Public servants and politicians are cornering the available resources in the country. For you to get employment, you must be connected to a politician or a top public servant.

    “When these unemployed youths realise they have no access to employment opportunities, they engage in drugs and other anti-social activities, like robbery, kidnapping, bombing and others, with dangerous consequences for the larger society.

    “People are graduating from the university and other higher institutions only to find out that there is no job for them. In situations like this, there can only be chaos, instability and restiveness among the youth,” Col. Umar said.

    He warned that if care is not taken, the entire country may implode under the weight of corruption, stressing that even the judiciary that the people look up to for salvation has continued to fail the nation.

    To Col. Umar, the two-year jail term with an option of N750,000 fine handed a former police pension boss, Yakubu Yusufu, convicted for N32 billion fraud by an Abuja High Court is ridiculous.

    Col. Umar however praised the cautious stance of the Federal Government on the dialogue offer proposed by the Boko Haram, as enunciated by the Chief of Defence Staff, Air Marshal Ola Sa’ad Ibrahim.

    Dr. Marshal Ibrahim said that the Federal Government would watch the sect for at least one month to be sure that it is sincere about the ceasefire and dialogue offer.

    Col. Umar urged the government to accept the dialogue offer, if the sect is eventually proved to be sincere and if its leaders are ready to make themselves available. “It is left for the Boko Haram leaders to prove to the whole world that they are sincere about dialogue,” he said.

  • Umar to Boko Haram: Forget Sharia if ….

    Umar to Boko Haram: Forget Sharia if ….

    Former military governor of Kaduna State, Col. Abubakar Umar (rtd) has told leaders and members of the Boko Haram sect to forget their demand for the institutionalization Sharia law for states in northern Nigeria if they are serious about dialoguing with the Federal Government.

    On the other hand, Umar also charged the Federal Government to show commitment in the fight against corruption and unemployment if indeed the government is sincere in its quest to end the spate of insecurity in the land.

    In a telephone interview with our correspondent on Thursday, Umar blamed both the Federal Government and Boko Haram for the number of deaths and destruction of property brought about by bombings across many states in the north, particularly in the north east.

    According to the radical former military governor, it would be futile and unreasonable for Boko Haram to insist on Islamisation of any part of the north as the sect had often demanded as one of the conditions for peace.

    He reminded the sect members on the secularity of the Nigerian state as enshrined in the Constitution, stressing that there is no state in northern Nigeria that does not have its own fair share of indigenous Christian and Moslem population.

    Umar said, “They should not forget that the Constitution says Nigeria is a secular state. That means we cannot run the country as a theocracy, otherwise we cannot remain as one.

    “They should also know that the north is neither a purely Islamic territory nor a Christian territory. So if they are seeking to impose Sharia on any part of the country as a condition for dialogue, it will never work.

    “Let them imagine what Nigeria will be like if every religious organisation seeks to impose its own doctrine on any party of the country. If that happens, then we can no longer remain as one country. Northern Nigeria cannot be cut off from the rest.

    “So if the institutionalization of Sharia in the north is one of the conditions the leaders of Boko Haram are projecting for dialogue, then they should perish the thought because that is not achievable.”