Tag: SOVEREIGN

  • Fitch affirms BoI’s sovereign rating stable

    Fitch affirms BoI’s sovereign rating stable

    Fitch Ratings has re-affirmed the national ratings of the Bank of Industry (BoI) as stable in outlook.

    Fitch had last year downgraded Nigeria’s Long-Term Local Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to ‘B+’ from ‘BB-’, as a result of which it is now equalised.

    The agency further noted that BoI’s ratings were retained because its operations were solely in local currency.

    According to Fitch, the IDRs of BoI, a state-owned policy bank, are driven by its SRF of ‘B+’ and reflect a limited probability of sovereign support.

    “The IDRs of BoI, a state-owned policy bank, are driven by its SRF of ‘B+’ and reflect a limited probability of sovereign support. They consider its 99.9 per cent state ownership, policy role and strategic importance to Nigeria’s economic and industrial development.

    “They also consider the authorities’ stronger ability to support BoI than commercial banks, as BoI’s operations are solely in local currency. BoI’s Long-Term IDR has a stable outlook, reflecting the stable outlook on the sovereign rating.

    “BoI’s IDRs, SR and SRF are sensitive to a weakening in Nigeria’s ability to support the bank, which would be indicated by a downgrade of Nigeria’s sovereign rating,” it said.

    A statement from Fitch added that the ratings could also be downgraded if its view of the state’s willingness to support the bank changes adversely, for example if there is a material change in the government ownership or a change in the bank’s policy role. This is not Fitch’s base case.

    BoI, however, maintained that it remained very virile and better repositioned to push the frontier of the nation’s industrial sector through aggressive business financing.

    On the rating of other banks, Fitch noted that it is monitoring the banks’ ability to meet maturing foreign-currency obligations. “In the current difficult market conditions, Fitch believes the banks are facing challenges to refinance existing obligations and/or obtain foreign exchange from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to meet maturing obligations.

  • Fitch affirms BoI’s sovereign rating

    Fitch Ratings has affirmed the national rating of the Bank of Industry (BoI) as well as seven other banks.

    According to Fitch, the rating actions followed its downgrade of Nigeria’s Long-Term Local Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to ‘B+’ from ‘BB-’, as a result of which it is now equalised with the Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR.

    A statement from Fitch explained that the new rating was driven by change in Fitch’s sovereign rating criteria. “Following the sovereign criteria change and rating action, Fitch has recalibrated the national rating scale for Nigeria. As a result the national ratings for these banks are affirmed as there is no change in their relative creditworthiness.

    “The national ratings of BOI are driven by potential sovereign support reflecting its 99.9 per cent state ownership, its policy role and the bank’s strategic importance to Nigeria’s economic and industrial development”, the statement read.

    BoI however, maintained that it remains very virile and better repositioned to push the frontier of the nation’s industrial sector through aggressive business financing.

  • Wither the Sovereign Wealth Fund?

    That is the true position of the $1 billion Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) deposit being managed by the Nigeria Sovereign Investment Authority (NSIA)?

    Is the $1 billion deposit still intact and generating profits or depleted to a balance of $300 million?

    The Sovereign Wealth Fund, which was set up by the NSIA Act, came into force in October 2012 and was created to receive surplus income generated from Nigeria’s excess oil reserves.

    It is intended to invest the savings gained on the difference between the budgeted and actual market prices for oil to earn returns that would benefit future generations of Nigerians.

    But conflicting reports indicating that all was not well with the fund came to the fore again last Thursday at the Presidential Villa, Abuja.

    While the Managing Director of NSIA, Uche Orji claimed that the $1billion initial sovereign fund contributed by the government was intact and generated N15.7 billion profit last year, the Chairman of the National Economic Council (NEC)’s Ad-Hoc Committee on the management of the Excess Crude Account and related Federation Account issues and Edo State Governor, Adams Oshiomhole disagreed with the claim.

    Oshiomhole maintained that he has evidence to prove that the $1 billion deposit has not only been depleted to $300 million, but that there were false claims that the fund was invested on other projects already funded from other sources.

    Speaking with State House correspondents after meeting with President Muhammadu Buhari at the Presidential Villa on the 9th of this month, Orji said: “The government gave us $1billion which is the only contribution we have received and we made N15.7 billion profit last year from the contribution.

    “We haven’t gotten additional fund from the govt but the fund is structured in a way that it can go through hard time.

    “We all know that the oil price is volatile, it comes up and goes down but the

    fund is structured in such a way that it can remain continuously profitable.

    “The funds remains the fund from the government and the profit made.” He added

    Orji’s position was deflated barely a week after by Oshiomhole last Thursday.

    Oshiomhole said: “I reported to the media that the Sovereign Wealth people in their report to us, which I have in black and white, showed clearly that they have only $300 million left in the Sovereign Wealth Fund account.

    “We have it in black and white and I can publish it if anybody wants to deny that because it was not submitted to me secretly. It was submitted at plenary of the committee.

    “And then we asked, because I knew that the fund was $1 billion, what was done with $700 million. And they said they have made some investments.

    “We asked them what they invested in and they said the second Niger bridge and partially in Kaduna-Abuja rail. That is what they said and I was not alone there.

    “We were about five governors and it was a full plenary. But we know that the Kaduna-Abuja rail was funded with Chinese loan, which even Mrs. Okonjo-Iweala spoke about, when they said the loan from China was not used for Lagos, she said it was for Kaduna-Abuja rail.

    “You media need to develop your own library and have your record so that when people speak from both sides of their mouths, you can replay back. Because sometimes it hurts me when political leaders and technocrats say one thing in the morning and they change the language the following day.” He said

    Urgently beaming the anti-corruption searchlight of the present administration in that direction may be needed to unravel the true position on the matter. Its time to act now.

     

  • ‘Robust Sovereign Wealth Fund  ‘ll cushion oil price slump’

    ‘Robust Sovereign Wealth Fund ‘ll cushion oil price slump’

    • Nigeria’s gas underutilised

    The Managing Director, Frontier Oil Limited, Dada Thomas  has advised the Federal Government to substantially grow the nation’s Sovereign  Wealth Fund (SWF)  to cushion the effects future oil price falls.

    He told The Nation that other countries resort to drawing from such funds in times of oil price slump, adding that when oil price goes up again, the drawn funds are replaced. He lamented that it is not the case with the country.

    He also lamented that Nigeria grossly underutilises her gas resource.

    He cited some countries that turned their economic woes to fortunes through prudent use of their SWF and efficient exploitation of their gas resources. He noted that Nigeria should follow suit by growing its SWF and optimise the utilisation of its abundant gas resource.

    He said: “I worked in Holland for five years and I helped develop some of the country’s gas resources. Holland was poor after the war but now look at the quality of life of the 14-15 million Dutch people. They generate more wealth than the 170 million Nigerians. They have taken the gas resources and turned it into wealth generating asset. The Norwegians have $800 billion sovereign wealth. They were lucky they were producing good oil at good prices for a long time.

    “I don’t think their population is more than Lagos State but they decided not just to provide for today but also for tomorrow. So are the Saudis, and that is the reason they said they have the capacity to sustain the oil price war with the United States for eight years. But as a nation, we instituted $2 billion SWF in the last couple of years and now I think it has been reduced to about $500 million.

    “Government needs to create framework and platform for encouraging people to invest in gas development in Nigeria especially for domestic consumption. We domesticate the use of the gas to power up Nigeria, to improve the economy and the quality of life of all of us. “How can we be sitting on 182 trillion cubic feet of gas and we don’t have power? “How can we be sitting on about 33 billion barrels of oil reserves, the seventh largest exporter of crude oil and yet we import refined products and we have four refineries? “We need to sit down as a nation and re-examine ourselves as to where we are, where we ought to be, and how we need to get there. As a nation, we will lose many things if the right policy decisions are not made to ensure a long term sustainable energy future. Gas is the key to unlocking Nigeria’s potentials economically, socially and quality of life of everybody.”

    Thomas said there is a lot that needed to be done about the  exploration and production (E&P) space especially on the gas side. “I started off thinking ahead of a project that is oil but it turned out to be gas. Thank God we didn’t give up. We also linked up with a partner that is not averse to gas business and together we created a brand new gas value chain in the southeast Nigeria where we are taking gas and turning it into power. Ibom Power in Akwa Ibom as it is today is being powered by gas from Frontier Uquo field.

  • Fear of the sovereign

    The word sovereign or sovereignty has become the fulcrum of debate on the desirability or otherwise of the envisaged conference of Nigeria’s ethnic nationalities. Most of the agitators for the conference have canvassed the convocation of its sovereign variant even as sceptics centre their reservations largely on this nomenclature. President Jonathan reacted to this dissonance when in his independence speech he referred to it as national conference/ dialogue. He further gave teeth to this seeming conceptual ambivalence when he inaugurated the committee and charged it to come out with the most appropriate name for this “national conversation”.

    Before then and since after, issues have also been raised on the propriety of a sovereign national conference with all democratic institutions in place. It has been variously canvassed that it is anomalous to talk of sovereign national conference when that sovereign power has been vested in elected structures at all levels of government especially the National Assembly.

    The thesis of this argument is that with the National Assembly in place, you cannot have two sovereigns at the same time. Once you constitute such a conference, you have inadvertently thrown to question the authority conferred on these institutions via democratic elections, it is further argued.

    Those who drive this school seem to be drawing strength from the postulations of social contract philosophers such as John Locke, Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes on the origin of modern states.

    These philosophers had characterized life in the state of nature as nasty, short and brutish. Due to the atavism of the state of nature, medieval man had to enter into a contract with a sovereign to whom he surrendered some of his powers and was in return, guaranteed protection. The abstraction recognizes two things at the same time: power belongs to the people; those who exercise power do it on their behalf. This is the philosophical root of the concept- sovereignty. It is an analytic construct to account for the residue of political power in modern governments. Its purpose is to domesticate the locus of political power.

    The idea has found further expression in modern governments through representative democracy. Because modern states can no longer permit of direct democracy as was practiced in ancient Greek City States, the people now exercise this sovereign power through elected representatives. Having elected their representatives, they confer sovereign powers on them to make laws for the good of them all.

    Conceived this way, it is presumed that those elected have now been armed to reflect the wishes and aspirations of their constituents. That is the point antagonists of sovereign national conference seem to be making. And there is some sense in it. But that is not all.

    There are also conditions under which the concept is supposed to operate in its pure form. For this symbiotic relationship to function optimally, these conditions have to be strictly observed and followed.

    The first is that the structures that throw up candidates for elective offices must be democratic enough to truly reflect the will of the people. Here, internal democracy within the political parties comes to mind. The other, closely related to the first is the issue of free and fair elections. Both form the necessary and sufficient conditions for the sovereignty of the people to have full expression. To what extent do those who purport to represent their people satisfy these basic conditions? And if they do not, how much of credibility do we ascribe to the sovereign powers they now purport to exercise on behalf of us all? These are the issues to ponder in the debate over where sovereign power really resides in our peculiar circumstance.

    It would appear that those who fault the convocation of a sovereign national conference on the ground that there is already sovereign power in the national assembly are not saying it all. They seem to have completely lost sight of the fact that what we have here is representative democracy in its most aberrant form. Not only is internal democracy observed in the breach, elections are yet to reflect the will of the people as amply expressed at the ballot box. When we canvass sovereign powers which elected structures or persons purport to possess, we should also call to mind the limitations in stretching this argument too far.

    Besides, it is also possible for those elected to supplant the wishes of their constituents with their personal goals. When we have a situation of goal displacement, our laws provide remedies for the people. That is why we have provisions for the recall process and impeachment. The same elite now parroting the sanctity of sovereign powers conferred on them through elections, are quick to erect obstacle against being impeached or recalled when they have fallen out of favour with their people. Thus, this new found love for the observance of extant regulations cannot stem from altruistic considerations. There must be more to it than the way it has been presented.

    Even then, it is clear that Nigerians desire to engage themselves on issues concerning their common destiny. Signals that things are going awry are very palpable throughout the length and breadth of this country. There are genuine fears that if urgent steps are not taken to stem this tide, the ensuing systemic stress may lead us to more disastrous consequences. Yet, some people are holding on to the issue of sovereignty as if it is an end unto itself rather that a means to an end-public good.

    It may be a mark of the failure of the sovereign powers of elected structures and persons that the country has drifted to the edge even after the various nationalities have co-habited for nearly 100 years. If a marriage can no longer hold after 100, is it not suggestive we have danger in our hands? If bending some of the rules can take us out of the impending doom, does it make any sense to be enslaved to stereotypes that portend dire consequences?

    In effect, the argument that we cannot have a sovereign national conference is neither here nor there. There is nothing so sacrosanct about the elections that produced these structures that they should pose an impediment to genuine efforts to get the architecture of this unity in diversity right. For, the same people vested with inalienable rights to confer sovereign powers on elected representatives can call such powers back when their representatives have become a liability.

    Just recently, something of that nature happened in Egypt when the same people who overwhelmingly voted in Morsi got utterly disenchanted with him after about a year in office. The revolution that saw him out without waiting for his tenure to expire is a classic demonstration of the sovereign will power of the people. This dialectics must not be ignored by those opposing a sovereign national conference.

    The authority of government is created and sustained by the consent of the people who remain the source of all political power. Benjamin Franklin summed up this when he wrote “In all free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereigns”. If a sovereign national conference is all that is required to pull back the country from the brink, those who oppose it do not believe in the continued existence of the country.

  • Sagay, David-West , others: it’s Sovereign National Conference or nothing

    Sagay, David-West , others: it’s Sovereign National Conference or nothing

    Notable Nigerians are kicking against a National Conference without sovereign power advocated on Tuesday by Senate President David Mark.

    Civil rights activist Shehu Sani described Mark’s suggestion as diversionary because whatever decision taken at such conference would not be binding.

    He said: “Nigerians are not just asking for a conference but a sovereign one. It is not the usual conference that come out with a communiqué but a conference with a resolution that is binding on the Nigerian people.

    “Right now, the country is operating under the military conference and the constitution authored by the Abacha and Abdulsalam military regimes. We need to use the opportunity of our centenary to freely discuss all issues that bother the Nigerian state, so as to strengthen our unity, democracy and enhance the wellbeing of our people.”

    Social critic and political activist Prof Tam David-West shared Sani’s view. He said national conference of ethnic nationalities being suggested by Mark was not the solution to the country’s problems . David-West said: “We need a SNC where the representatives of all ethnic group would sit and freely discuss on how we relate with one another, do we still want to remain as a country and what type of government do we want.

    “We should not run away from the truth, we should come to a round table conference to discuss our differences and the structural distortions in the polity. Whatever decisions taken at such conference become sacrosanct like the Bible and the Qur’an.”

    Constitutional lawyer and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Prof Itse Sagay said Mark needs some education about why the conference must be sovereign.

    He said: “If it is National Conference without sovereign powers, it is okay, it is a good development. Though, Sovereign National Conference is preferable. It is assembly of Nigerians to discuss issues and come up with the best possible means of addressing and proffer solutions to Nigeria’s problems. There is no need for us to hold a conference that its decision would not be binding.

    He said the conference should address: the issue of ideology, that is, what should be the ideological direction of Nigeria; the relationship between the federating units as regards issues of economy and political power distribution, production of a new constitution for the country and the issue of social welfare programme for Nigerians.

  • Why Sovereign National C onference can’t work now, by Mark

    Why Sovereign National C onference can’t work now, by Mark

    Senate President David Mark has urged proponents of sovereign national conference to forget it.

    He spoke at the 53rd Annual General Conference of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) in Calabar, Cross River State.

    Mark, represented by Senate Leader Victor Ndoma-Egba (SAN), said it was it was not feasible, until the section on Constitution amendment is reviewed.

    He said: “The 1999 Constitution (as amended) made provisions for its alteration. It did not make provisions for any new constitution.

    “It is in answer to the clamour for a new constitution by vocal sections of the polity that an amendment to make provisions for how a new constitution can come about is being contemplated.

    “In making these calls, suggestions for the process of making a new constitution have been made. These range from a constitutional conference to a ‘Sovereign’ National Conference.

    “The National Assembly recognises the right of Nigerians to aggregate, assemble or meet in any legitimate form or manner to discuss the affairs of their country and indeed encourages such fora as it is a constitutional right.

    “A mark of such encouragement is the elaborate public hearings that have become part of our constitutional amendment process.

    “We, however, have difficulties with the calls by certain sections of the polity for a ‘Sovereign’ National Conference.

    “The 1999 Constitution (as amended) with all its imperfections, including its debatable origin, remains our grundnorm, our supreme law from which all other laws derive and expresses our sovereignty.

    “It creates all the powers, institutions and authorities of the State to which we have all submitted. We have challenged its provisions in courts of law established by it and obeyed the decisions of these courts. We have therefore ratified the constitution by our conduct. The 1999 constitution (as amended) is a reality.

    “Consequently, where will the ‘Sovereign National Conference’ be deriving its sovereignty from, and under what framework? How will the conference be convoked and by whom and under what terms? I have been confronted by the argument that sovereignty derives from and belongs to the people. This is certainly beyond argument.

    “How then do we get the people to confer sovereignty on such a conference? There are intractable issues to be addressed by the agitations for the ‘Sovereign National Conference’ and that is why I subscribe to the proposal for an amendment to the 1999 Constitution to provide for the making of a new Constitution.”

    Former Vice-President Atiku Abubukar and House of Representatives Speaker Aminu Tambuwal also spoke on the state of the nation at the event.

    Tambuwal said Nigeria faces serious challenges of nationhood, adding that despite being blessed with intellectual and material resources, the gap between the rich and the poor continue to widen.

    “In the face of stupendous wealth, resources and potentials with which we could build a united nation of prosperous people we are indirectly but gradually building two nations in one: a nation of prosperity and affluence on the one hand and another nation of poverty and squalor on the other, yet our desire and expectation is nation building,” he said.

    “We are, no doubt, a people divinely gifted with intellect and wisdom, but the receiver of a gift is at liberty to apply it in the manner he chooses.

    “When we look around us and behold how bountifully we are blessed as a nation, we cannot help asking the question: Is it in our stars?”

    Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar decried what he called a consistent and progressive marginalisation of the vast majority of Nigerians.

    The discrimination, he said, is as a result of policies which encourage “inequitable interpersonal and inter-regional distribution of opportunities.”

     

  • ‘Sovereign Wealth is  not a pension fund’

    ‘Sovereign Wealth is not a pension fund’

    Mr. Uche Orji is the Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Sovereign Investment Authority (NSIA), he spoke with journalists recently in Abuja. Assistant Editor, Nduka Chiejina was there.  

     

     

    Right now there is $1billion in the fund, How much do you see coming into the fund and the timeline, has there been an agreement within government and what exactly will be the mechanism of getting money into the fund, when would more funds be injected into the fund?

    There are three factors as you know that affects contributions to the fund and those three factors include price of oil, benchmark rate and production levels. The Act is very clear as to the contributions to the fund, what it says is that revenue in excess of the benchmark rates less than what is prescribed in the budget should be contributed to the NSIA account. It takes time to be operational and the idea is that the Act will be followed interms of the contribution to the fund. We have also been very careful how we run the organisation as you know with most endowments. Regarding the governors, the NSIA is not a party to any suit, there is a suit between the federal government and the state governments, the NSIA is not a party to any suit. There is an enabling law that set up the NSIA. What we have done is to reach out to the governors who are part of the governing council anyway. The governing council is made up of roughly 54 people and the state governors are members as shareholders. This fund is owned by the three tiers of government, the federal government, state government and local governments with the President as the chairman of the economic council which also includes the governors. We are not party to any law suit as on-going with the federal government.

    When would money be injected?

    The Act is clear that it will be transferred monthly, but again we need to be fully operational and ready for the new funds to come in so there is conversation on-going already and for the funds to be transferred. We are ready to start investing, in June stabilisation fund gets invested starting from June as well the future generation fund starts and before the end of the year we make commitments to infrastructure. These are early stages for operational investments. The early stages will take time to work themselves out before we start seeing contributions come in.

    Does that mean you will be waiting to be fully operational before funds will be injected?

    I just said that discussions are on-going and conversations are on as we speak.

    So you are not sure and it is open-ended when funds will come into the fund?

    I don’t want to say open-ended, conversations are on-going.

    In your investment portfolio, what are your expectation in terms of returns say in the next one year?

    Each of the funds have returns objectives, we don’t want to put numbers down that will affect our ability to negotiate because we have co-investors, the reality is that we are going to earn commercial returns on the infrastructure side as well as earn returns that will march the benchmark we have set for the future generation and the stabilisation funds.

    Our objective is to build returns above inflation. Here the reporting currency will be the dollar, the Nigerian infrastructure fund has geographical restrictions, the other two funds do not have geographical restrictions.

    For the future generation funds most savings funds have done roughly four to five per cent over time. That’s for savings funds we are expecting to earn CPI at + above 400 basis points above the future generation fund. For the infrastructure fund each project will be negotiated and so we cannot put a number out there but look at what people earn in terms of commercial infrastructure investments in Nigeria and that will give you an idea as to what we are targeting. We understand what is at stake here. These funds will invest in those things that straddle commercial returns and development impact and the way it is in Nigeria these two factors are not mutually exclusive; each is negotiated on a project by project basis. The law enables us to make commercial returns on these investments. So just look at some of the infrastructure we have in Nigeria and that will give you an idea of what returns we may be having on these infrastructure investment.

    You said you will service staff salaries from your earnings, if you are not likely to make any earnings in the next one year how will you service staff salaries?

    As an organisation we are trying to stay within a cost to asset ratio of 1% which is why we will have a lean staff, it is easy in our opinion to earn what it takes to keep our expenses running and more. Our objective is to earn consistent profitability. Our Act says we will have to repatriate dividends to all the tiers of government that own this fund after five years of consistent profitability. It is one of our objectives and we intend to achieve it. We are keeping a very lean head count and we can afford it.

    With the NSIA commencing operation, does this mean that there will no longer be sharing of the Excess Crude Account?

    I will not speak on Excess Crude Account that is the Nigerian Sovereign Investment Authority. The way and when the Excess Crude Account is shared is for the Minister of Finance and the Federal Executive Council, in terms of what commitments to the Excess Crude Account that is not in my place to comment on.

    In the case of Infrastructure fund that will bring in benefits for the people, are you going to charge on the roads and other infrastructure?

    In terms of our infrastructure commitment, some of the infrastructure areas will be Greenfield areas that means that we are not going to earn anything for some time. It will take two to three years to complete before you start earning something, some are late stage projects and I mentioned six (6) areas that we want to focus on and we will make commitments before the end of the year in these areas. We don’t expect that we will earn anything from infrastructure fund until next year, so most of the returns we are targeting will come from the future generation fund and from the stabilisation fund in the first year that’s where we are expecting returns to come through in the first year. The idea is to grow our cost base as we earn a return. We believe that we will earn enough from the stabilisation fund and the future generation fund to cover our overhead. We add staff, as time goes on we expect to earn from infrastructure fund starting from next year, these things take time and I don’t expect it to fund our operations for some time.

    Specific areas I mentioned include agriculture, water resources, power, health care, transportation including aviation, infrastructure and housing. These are the infrastructure we have in the pipeline, there are many other areas as we build capacity we will explore these ares as well. These are the priority areas we will focus on. We cannot mention specific projects that we will go into right now. The Act demands that we tell you what projects but until we are about to sign the projects we cannot tell you now.

    The Nigerian infrastructure fund will focus only on Nigeria. We have done extensive work so far on some initial areas that form our initial focus, some of the areas we have assessed opportunity include housing, agriculture, power, water resources, transportation which includes ports and aviation and health care.

    Will you be charging for the use of these infrastructure?

    Of course, these are commercial infrastructure, so will charge for their use. We are investing with co investors some of them are other Sovereign Wealth funds, some are private equity investors; it’s not a charity, if you look at infrastructure funds around the world most of them earn on the average six to seven per cent. We will invest in areas where there are commercial returns.

    The Act allows us to earn commercial returns. This is a self sustaining enterprise. Our three principles are financial sustainability, independence of decision making and transparency. We will invest in areas where we will make returns that is why it is called Sovereign Wealth Fund. Other intervention programmes like the budget will be done with the budget. Here we are investors, that is the difference between what we do and what other arms of government do. Don’t forget the returns are for the Nigerian people. At the end of the day this money goes back to Nigerians, it goes back to the three tiers of government that own it.

    This fund will be managed in-house and the idea is to earn commercial returns as you know there is within the Act a sub set of the fund which should be devoted to social infrastructure. They access up to 10 per cent of the infrastructure fund which should be devoted to social infrastructure. This fund is not a grant scheme, it will also earn returns as we invest in social infrastructure which by definition includes health care, education, inland water resources and in my opinion environmental factors.

    In the build up to the establishment of this authority is the argument that it would attract other investors from outside, have you had any discussions with other Sovereign Wealth funds and what is the outlook in this regards?

    In the last six months we have spent time visiting many sovereign wealth funds. Many sovereign wealth funds as you know were my clients, I have had discussions with them and we have letters of encouragement and pledges of co investment if we show them viable ideas. What we plan to do is to become a credible vehicle for those of them who want to engage in Nigeria. It is now up to us to bring ideas and investment opportunities many people are interested to come in to Nigeria, people see the potentials everybody. The policies of the past and present are beginning to bear positive fruits. As a result, Nigeria is one of the few countries that had ratings upgrade in the last two years That’s very important because when your rating is upgraded your cost of debt goes down. People see a lot of potentials in Nigeria internationally than you can imagine. As we bring ideas that are commercially viable other people will want to come and invest with us. You also need to know that the profit’s the NSIA makes is not for profit sake but it goes to every Nigerian.

    This is an enterprise structured in the way of other Sovereign wealth funds; the idea here, as the Act has mandated us, invest prudently, earn commercial returns where possible as an organisation to contribute to development impact within the country.

    How and when will the future generation begin to benefit from the fund?

    Future generation fund is a savings fund. It is not a pension where we invest for a payout. The idea is to grow a savings base to prepare the country in the event of a depletion of our hydrocarbon resources. If you watch what is happening in other Sovereign Wealth Funds,they invest $200 million or more and years down the line the investment grows so large that it is the future generation that benefits from that investment. This is a savings funds. If this fund  makes consistent profit for five years, future generation funds will also invest in real estate infrastructure as well invest in private equity, in some cases depending on the area of investment the benefit can come sooner or come later but the purpose of this fund is the savings for the future generation of Nigerians. Like other funds, the benefits tend to come much later, at the minimum if this fund makes profit consistently for five years as we are hoping we will start to partake of the dividends to the three tiers of government. The earliest you will start to see any benefits will be through the return this savings fund will make in five years of consistent profitability before we start making repatriations of dividends to the Nigerian people. But the ideal scenario here is to grow the savings so that the same way you look at other countries with big bragging rights of funds that are big which really is the basis for their future generation to spend, that I think should be the objective.

    It takes quite a while before you commit to projects, in most countries project development takes at least 14 months and consequently a lot of work is going on here and as I have committed to you we will announce our first commitment before the year runs out. These things take time and we will be careful with the way we allocate resources in these sectors.

     

  • ‘Sovereign Wealth Fund  to invest $850m’

    ‘Sovereign Wealth Fund to invest $850m’

    The investment arm of the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) – the Nigeria Sovereign Investment Authority (NSIA) – has approved an investment allocation of $850 million for the three investment windows of the SWF.

    Managing Director/CEO of NSIA, Mr. Uche Orji, said the Future Generations Fund and the Nigeria Infrastructure Fund will each get $325 million or 32.5 per cent while the Stabilisation Fund will receive $200 million or 20 per cent. He spoke yesterday on the commencement of the operations of the NSIA

    The remaining 15 per cent of $150 million, he said “will be kept as unallocated for now, and used to top up each of the ring-fenced funds, as opportunities arise.”

    Orji said the plan “aims to balance the infrastructure need of the current generation and the need for savings for the future generation of Nigerians.”

    Investment in the Stabilisation Fund will start next month as the Future Generation Fund will continue till end of 2013 “because it is a more diversified portfolio with a more complicated process.”

    On Infrastructure Fund, Orji said: “a very detailed and thorough review of possible investment areas and projects is ongoing. The investments being considered with the infrastructure fund are housing, agriculture, power, water resources, transportation ,sports, aviation and health care.”

    The objective of the NSIA he explained, is to build returns above inflation, and the reporting currency will be the dollar.

    He said the Nigeria infrastructure fund has geographical restrictions the other two funds do not have geographical restrictions. The Nigeria infrastructure fund will focus only on Nigeria.

    We have done extensive work so far on some initial areas that form our initial focus, some of the areas we have assessed opportunity include

    These funds Orji said “will be managed in-house and the idea is to earn commercial returns a sub set of the fund should be devoted to social infrastructure.”

    As regards to when contributions will start flowing into the fund, Orji said “the Act is very clear as to the contributions to the fund, what it says is that revenue in excess of the benchmark rates less what is prescribed in the budget should be contributed to the NSIA account.”

    These excess revenue, he explained, “will be transferred monthly but again we need to be fully operational and ready for the new funds to come in so there is conversations on-going already and for the funds to be transferred. When the Act is fully followed, this will be an automatic process. We are ready to start investing.”

    When asked about the Excess Crude Account (ECA) Orji declined to speak, saying, “that is for minister of finance.”

    In terms of commitments to the infrastructure fund, the NSIA boss said “these are commercial infrastructure so we will charge for their use, we are investing with co investors some of them are other Sovereign Wealth funds some are private equity investors, it’s not a charity, if you look at infrastructure funds around the world most of them earn on the average six to seven per cent. We will invest in areas where there are commercial returns.”

    Future generation fund he said is a savings fund and not a pension fund where we invest for a pay out. The idea “is to grow a savings base to prepare the country in the event of a depletion of our hydrocarbon resources. The purpose of this fund is the savings for the future generation of Nigerians like other funds the benefits tend to come much later, at the minimum if this fund makes profit consistently for five years as we are hoping we will start to partake of the dividends to the three tiers of government.”

    He cautioned that “the earliest Nigeria will start to see any benefits will be through the return this savings fund will make in five years of consistent profitability before we start making repatriations to Nigerian people.”

    He said the NSIA is a self-sustaining enterprise with the three principles of financial sustainability, independence of decision making and transparency.

    He assured Nigerians that the Authority “will invest in areas where we will make returns that is why it is called Sovereign Wealth Fund. Other intervention programmes like the budget will be done with the budget, here we are investors, that is the difference between what we do and what other arms of Government do.”

     

  • Nigeria sovereign investment authority and AMCON

    Nigeria sovereign investment authority and AMCON

    CAPTIONS

    AMCON 1 (L-R) President Goodluck Jonathan, Minister of Finance Dr Ngozi

    Okonjo-Iweala, and Head of Admin &Services Asset Management of Nigeria

    (AMCON), Iyatum Adode, during a meeting at the Presidential

     

    AMCON 2 (L-R) Minister of State For Finance Dr. Yerima Lawal

    Ngama, President Goodluck Jonathan, Minister of Finance Dr Ngozi

    Okonjo-Iweala, and Head of Admin &Services Asset Management of Nigeria

    (AMCON), Iyatum Adode, during a meeting at the Presidential

    Villa Abuja yesterday.

    AMCON 3 L-R Minister of State Finance Dr. Yarima Ngama, President

    Goodluck Jonathan, Minister of Finance Dr. Ngozi Okonjo Iweala and

    Head Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) Iyatum Adode

    during their courtesy visit to the Presidential Villa Abuja yesterday.

     

    NSIA 1,2,(L-R) Chairman Nigeria Sovereign Ivestment Authority

    (NISA) Mahey Rasheed,President Goodluck Jonathan, Minister of Finance
    Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala,and Managing  Director Nigeria Sovereign
    Ivestment Authority Uche Orji, after  the Inauguration of the NISA, at
    the Presidential villa Abuja  yesterday.