Tag: Sowore

  • Activist slams Sowore over attack on Tinubu

    Activist slams Sowore over attack on Tinubu

    The Leadership Centre for Civil and Post-Trauma Rehabilitation has cautioned activist Omoyele Sowore over his recent verbal attacks on President Bola Tinubu.

    Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday in Abuja, the general secretary of the group, Dr. Agbi Abubakar, condemned Sowore’s recent statements, describing them as highly irresponsible and unacceptable.

    He noted that Sowore had previously insulted senior public figures, including the Inspector General of Police, religious leaders, governors, and ministers, and has now extended his attacks to the presidency.

    Abubakar said, “Any attempt to label the President a criminal is a crossing of the red line.

    “Enough is enough! These orchestrated assaults on the President’s character, integrity, and track record have gone beyond the limits of tolerance and decency.”

    Dr. Abubakar praised President Tinubu’s leadership, describing it as a “grass-to-grace” story and a beacon of hope in governance.

    According to him, the President has introduced unparalleled governance frameworks, along with exemplary administrative, accounting, and auditing practices, setting a new benchmark for leadership in Nigeria.

    Read Also: DSS summons Sowore over post on Tinubu

     He highlighted the President’s bold policy reforms, which, according to him, have brought clarity and progress to national administration.

    He added, “President Tinubu’s reforms have essentially cleansed the Augean stables. His achievements have captured the imagination of Africa and the world, proving that transformational leadership is possible on the continent.

    “These governance templates will serve for all times and across all climes. They stand as models for effective leadership.

    Abubakar labelled Sowore as a “perennial candidate for high office who has consistently proved his electoral worthlessness.”

  • Group slams Sowore over attacks on IGP

    Group slams Sowore over attacks on IGP

    The Police Integrity Movement has condemned civil rights activist Omoyele Sowore for what it described as his relentless and unwarranted attacks on Inspector General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun. 

    The group questioned Sowore’s motives, wondering why he has chosen to consistently criticise the police leadership at a time when the country is grappling with significant security concerns.

    It argued instead of attacking the police, Nigerians should be rallying behind the authorities to find solutions to the nation’s security challenges. 

    According to the spokesperson of the group,  Isaiah Ijele: “At a time of immense security concerns facing our country, the reasonable thing one expects from well-meaning Nigerians is to join hands with the Police authorities on the way out of the woods,” the group said. “On the contrary, Sowore has become a tool of destruction and to ridicule the Nigerian Police.”

    It added under the current Inspector General of Police, significant strides have been made with over 150,000 officers promoted, and the police pension scheme has been digitalised. 

    Read Also: DSS summons Sowore over post on Tinubu

    It added insurance coverage has been provided for fallen officers, and awards have been instituted to encourage and recognize the best officers. These efforts demonstrate a commitment to the welfare and professionalism of the police force.

    “We urge activists like Omoyele Sowore to leave the IGP alone and allow him to continue his good work. A more balanced approach would help foster a more positive and supportive environment for law enforcement agencies to thrive.

    “In the meantime, The Police Integrity Movement is a vital initiative dedicated to upholding police integrity, accountability, equity, and justice within our law enforcement agencies. It’s crucial because many Nigerians harbour negative sentiments toward the police due to the actions of a few corrupt individuals. This negativity unfairly impacts the majority of dedicated officers, leading to their stigmatization.

    “Every organization has its share of good, bad, and ugly elements, but it’s disheartening that online platforms often highlight only the corrupt actions of some officers. This constant focus on the negative promotes crime and corruption while demoralizing law enforcement agencies, making it challenging for honest officers to thrive.

    “Our movement aims to foster positive awareness and appreciation for the good officers who serve and protect us. We must honor the sacrifices of those who have died in the line of duty. It’s time for activists to reconsider their approach and adopt a balanced perspective to rebuild trust and support the vital work of our law enforcement agencies,” the group stressed. 

  • Between X, DSS and Sowore

    Between X, DSS and Sowore

    • By Abdullahi Suleiman Otiwe

    Sir: On August 7, the rights activist, Omoyele Sowore published via his official X’s handle the notification he received from the X Team informing him of a complaint from Department of State Services (DSS). According to X, DSS claimed the Sowore’s alleged publication referring to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as “this criminal…” violated the laws of Nigeria. X further claimed not to have taken any action against such publication at the time of informing him. While putting disclaimers, X advised him to take appropriate steps in seeking redress if Sowore felt his rights was being infringed upon in any way.

    The conclusion one could easily reach from the notification by X to Sowore above is that the platform was ignorant of the laws of Nigeria despite the DSS’s formal notification citing relevant provisions of the laws. It is fair also to conclude that X did not investigate the compliant by DSS before its prejudicial notification to Sowore to “weigh his options” against the Nigerian government.

    Interestingly, this is the same X that interpreted the innuendo in case of late President Muhammadu Buhari leading to restrictions placed on its operation in Nigeria.

    The right to free speech is no doubt, very fundamental and all constituted authorities must be compelled to respect it. In democracy, feedbacks from the citizens are the bedrock of sustainable government and any attempt to silence one citizen especially in this digital media era will lead to chaos. The constitution that guarantees fundamental rights of every Nigerian must be guarded jealously. However, the citizens too must understand their boundaries.

    While Section 39 of the Nigerian Constitution provides for right to freedom of expression, Section 45 of the same constitution also set some restrictions on such right amongst others in the interest of public order or for the purpose of protecting the rights and freedom of other persons. Laws and orders are made in the interest public and people throughout Nigeria. The various laws cited by the DSS for which Sowore is alleged to have breached could be enforced in this country.

    Years back, I had cause to decry the federal government’s decision when it banned the operation of X in the country without considering the rights of other citizens that relied on the platform for their businesses. This is against the backdrop that X was not even monetized then. Today, things have changed.

    Read Also: DSS summons Sowore over post on Tinubu

    Like every nation, the federal government should be able to take measures in defence of national security, public order and the protection of the rights of its citizens. The United States government did the same when it restricted the operation of TikTok citing similar reason under the US laws. The fact that X has not given an official statement on its failure to investigate the alleged threat to Nigeria’s national security shows complicit and how our nation’s sovereignty is disrespected.

    The fact that Sowore actually referred the nation’s president as “this criminal…” should have actually been censored even if it were reference to ordinary Nigerian. Except for the court of law, no person has a right to call another a criminal under the laws of this country. The task before us is to create a balance where the government must resist the urge to silence dissent, while citizens respect the boundaries of lawful expression. Platforms like X should act responsibly, neither as government censors nor as indifferent bystanders.

    •Abdullahi Suleiman Otiwe Esq

    Abuja

  • CSOs slam Sowore for attacking Tinubu

    CSOs slam Sowore for attacking Tinubu

    Some civil society organisations led by Independent Public Service and Accountability Watch (IPSAW) have carpeted former presidential candidate of the African Alliance Congress (AAC) in the 2023 election, Omoyele Sowore for attacking President Bola Tinubu.

    Tinubu had, a few days ago addressed investors in Brazil where he declared that his reforms and initiatives have left no room for corruption in Nigeria.

    However, Omoyele Sowore on his verified Facebook account debunked President Tinubu’s statements and called him a liar for declaring Nigeria corrupt free.

    Addressing a press conference, Leader of the group, Comrade Adeniran Taiwo Olugbenga denounced Sowore for attacking the president in his post.

    The group also led a protest to the headquarters of the Federal Ministry of Justice where it called for the immediate arrest and incarceration of the AAC presidential candidate.

    “In addressing a duly elected and legitimate President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria a liar, Sowore has crossed the red lines. This is beyond constructive criticism and opposition politics, this is madness and bitterness taken too far.

    “Of course freedom of expression is sacred, but it is not a license for lunacy. Our constitution protects speech, not sabotage. Omoyele Sowore’s actions are not activism but a deliberate assault on Nigeria’s soul. Branding our nation as hell abroad is not dissent, it is betrayal.

    Read Also: CSOs seek harmonised regulations

    “For someone who aspired to be the President of this country, Sowore doesn’t build Nigeria’s image, he defaces it. He is not aiming for a better Nigeria but an opportunity to settle scores with political rivals and mislead a few gullible Nigerians.

    You don’t curse your country on the world stage and call it patriotism. This is madness and not activism.

    “Sowore’s so-called activism is a toxic brew of despair, chaos, and self-promotion. He thrives on wreckage, not reform, on division, not destiny. Nigerian youth have proven that protest can spark progress. EndSARS forced police reforms; Not-Too-Young-Too-Run shattered barriers to leadership. These were movements of vision, fueled by hope and anchored in solutions.

    “In clear contrast, Sowore’s brand of activism doesn’t inspire, it poisons minds. He is obsessed with chaos and every national challenge becomes his spotlight, every crisis his megaphone, every pain his performance. This is not activism, its social sabotage and must be stopped by all means.

    “Sowore’s kind of reckless rhetoric is a spark that ignites extremism, empowers opportunists, and fractures our fragile security. His words are not just noise, they are a direct danger to the Nigerian state. His latest outburst proves it and we must not allow him to infect our youth with this noise and chaos” the text stated.

    The group affirmed its support for President Tinubu and the Renewed Hope Agenda which it said was already having monumental impacts in the lives of Nigerians, vowing to oppose any crisis entrepreneur who might want to jeopardise the reforms of the current administration for their selfish interests.

  • IG charges Sowore with false publication, forgery

    IG charges Sowore with false publication, forgery

    • Activist to be arraigned September 15

    Inspector General of Police (IGP) Kayode Egbetokun has charged politician and online publisher, Omoyele Sowore, with false publication and forgery.

    In a three-count charge filed before the Federal High Court in Abuja, the IGP accused Sowore of, among others, making false publication about the police on his media platforms and forging a police signal.

    The counts read:

    *That you, Omoyele Sowore, and Sahara Reporters, on or about July 30, 2025, did conspire between yourselves to commit a felony, to wit, forgery and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 1 (2) (C) of Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M17 Law of the Federation of Nigeria.

    *That you, Omoyele Sowore, and Sahara Reporters on or about July 30, 2025 forged a police wireless message purported to have been signed by the Principal Staff Officer to the Inspector General of Police, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 1 (2) (C) of the Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M17 Law of the Federation of Nigeria.

    Read Also: Alleged terrorism financing: Court orders six banks to supply IGP details of Sowore’s accounts

    *That you, Omoyele Sowore, on or about July 31, 2025, did intentionally post a fake police signal and other inciting materials on your Facebook page with the intention to incite members of the force and the general public to embark on a mutiny against the Federal Government of Nigeria, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 114 of the Penal Code Law.

    Sowore was to be arraigned on the charge yesterday, but got the inability of the prosecution to serve the charge on his media platform, Sahara Reporters, listed as the second defendant.

    The prosecuting lawyer, Wisdom Madaki, told the court that efforts to serve the second defendant through a substituted means, by newspaper publication, was still in progress.

    Madaki applied for a fresh date for the arraignment of the defendants, a request Justice Emeka Nwite granted and adjourned till September 15 for arraignment.

  • JUST IN: IGP charges Sowore with false publication, forgery

    JUST IN: IGP charges Sowore with false publication, forgery

    …to be arraigned September 15

    The Inspector General of Police (IGP), Kayode Egbetokun has charged politician and online publisher, Omoyele Sowore with false publication and forgery.

    In a three-count charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/374/2025 filed before the Federal High Court in Abuja, the IGP accused Sowore of among others, making false publication about the police on his media platforms and forging a police signal.

    The counts read:

    *That you Omoyele Sowore and Sahara Reporters on or about the 30th day of July, 2025 did conspire between yourselves to commit a felony to wit forgery and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 1 (2) (C) of Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M17 Law of the Federation of Nigeria.

    *That you Omoyele Sowore and Sahara Reporters on or about the 30th day of July, 2025 forged a police wireless message purported to have been signed by the Principal Staff Officer to the inspector General of Police, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 1 (2) (C) of Miscellaneous Offences Act Cap M17 Law of the Federation of the Nigeria. 

    Read Also: Alleged terrorism financing: ‘Six banks to furnish IG details of Sowore’s accounts’

    *That you Omoyele Sowore on or about the 31st day of July, 2025 did intentionally post a fake police signal and other inciting materials on your Facebook page with intention to incite members of the force and the general public to embarked on a mutiny against the Federal Government of Nigeria, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 114 of the Penal Code Law.

    Sowore was to be arraigned on the charge on Wednesday, but got the inability of the prosecution to serve the charge on his media platform, Sahara Reporters, listed as the second defendant.

    Prosecuting lawyer, Wisdom Madaki told the court that efforts to serve the second defendant through substituted means, by newspaper publication is still in progress.

    Madaki applied for a fresh date for the arraignment of the defendants, a request Justice Emeka Nwite granted and adjourned till September 15 for arraignment.

  • Alleged terrorism financing: ‘Six banks to furnish IG details of Sowore’s accounts’

    Alleged terrorism financing: ‘Six banks to furnish IG details of Sowore’s accounts’

    A Federal High Court in Abuja has ordered six financial institutions to supply the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) details of transactions from January 2024 till date in the bank accounts linked to politician and online publisher, Omoyele Sowore, and his companies.

    Justice Emeka Nwite issued the order yesterday while ruling on an ex parte application filed by IGP Kayode Egbetokun.

    The application was moved by a police lawyer, Wisdom Madaki.

    The Nation learnt that no fewer than 26 bank accounts linked to Sowore, including those of Sahara Reporters Media Foundation and African Action Congress (AAC), among others, are being investigated.

    READ ALSO; What does Remi Tinubu want?

    The IGP prayed for “an order directing the banks to furnish the applicant through the Office of the Inspector General of Police Monitoring Unit account opening package/mandate card, certified true copy of the statement of account reflecting transfers with account numbers of both inflows and outflows from January 2024 till date”.

    The applicant said the order was needed because Sowore “is being investigated for terrorism financing, money laundering and fraudulent activities”.

    He added: “The complainant had commenced an investigation into the activities of the first respondent (Sowore).

    “The accounts in respect of which details were being sought are the accounts which the first respondent is using for terrorism financing and money laundering.”

    In a supporting affidavit, the IGP stated that the police received intelligence that Sowore “is using the accounts for terrorism financing, money laundering, and receives financial support from a foreign partner for terrorism”.

    He added that there was a need for the police to secure the order of the court to obtain the statements of the accounts to enable the office to investigate the alleged fraudulent activities of the suspects.

    “The office of the complainant receives an intelligent report that the first respondent is using the accounts for terrorism financing, money laundering, and receives financial support from foreign partners for terrorism.

    “The first respondent is being investigated for terrorism financing, money laundering, and fraudulent activities.

    “There is a need for the court to grant the relief sought for the investigation.

    “The respondent has been using the accounts for money laundering and terrorism funding, and fraudulent activities.”

  • Sowore to face criminal charges in court – Police

    Sowore to face criminal charges in court – Police

    The Nigeria Police Force (NPF) on Saturday said charges against human rights activist and 2023 presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) Omoyele Sowore are criminal.

    NPF said Sowore will soon face them in a competent court.

    Police said he was arrested based on credible, corroborated allegations involving criminal offences such as forgery, cyberstalking, and other infractions currently under active investigation. 

    The arrest, the police said, was effected in full compliance with extant legal provisions, and with strict adherence to constitutional safeguards, due process, and the rights of the suspect.

    The police also denied allegations of torturing Sowore following his recent arrest in Abuja.

    According to a statement by the Force Public Relations Officer, DCP Olumuyiwa Adejobi, the police emphasized that Sowore was granted bail within the 48-hour constitutional limit as stipulated in Section 35(4) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended).

    Adejobi said Sowore had been informed of the charges against him and was expected to appear before a competent court in the coming days.

    Responding to viral images of Sowore wearing a bandage on his arm, the police described the narrative of torture as “false and grossly misleading.”

    The NPF said the bandage was part of Sowore’s belongings before his arrest, and was not a result of any injury sustained in police custody.

    Adejobi said; “To be clear, Mr. Sowore was released on bail well within the 48-hour constitutional window… He is fully aware of the nature of the allegations against him.

    “Equally false is the narrative suggesting that Mr. Sowore was tortured or subjected to any form of inhuman or degrading treatment while in custody”.

    The Police claimed that two separate medical examinations were offered to Mr. Sowore on August 7 and 8, conducted by teams led by the Medical Director of Muhammadu Buhari Police Hospital and the Force Medical Officer, respectively. 

    Adejobi said both offers were reportedly declined by the activist.

    “The record must show that the opportunity for independent medical verification was twice provided and twice rejected,” the Police added.

    The Force further stated that his continued detention was backed by a valid remand order from a court of competent jurisdiction, and warned against what it described as “sensationalism” by some civil society groups and media actors.

    He said; “The Nigeria Police Force reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the protection of human rights, respect for the rule of law, and the pursuit of justice without fear or favour. No individual regardless of their status, influence, or social media reach is above the law”.

    Adejobi said the Police will provide further updates as investigations continue.

  • Protesters demand release of Sowore

    Protesters demand release of Sowore

    …why Sowore is in detention – CP

    Protesters on Friday morning stormed the Force Headquarters, demanding the unconditional release of human rights activist and 2023 presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (ADC), Omoyele Sowore.

    They were seen chanting solidarity songs calling on the Inspector–General of Police (IGP), Kayode Egbetokun, to effect Sowore’s freedom.

    Supporters of Sowore are staging protests in different parts of the country, including Lagos, Abuja, Osun and Oyo states, calling for the release of the pro-democracy campaigner, who earlier honoured an invitation from the Inspector General of Police Monitoring Unit, at the Force Headquarters, in Abuja, on Wednesday, and was subsequently detained.

    During their demonstration, the Commissioner of Police (CP) for the Special Intervention Squad, Abayomi Shogunle, explained why Sowore is being detained by the Nigeria Police Force (NPF).

    Shogunle, while addressing the protesters, said Sowore’s arrest and detention were ordered after the activist allegedly refused to make a statement upon police interrogation.

    Sowore recently led a protest to demand better welfare for retired police officers and had also made critical comments concerning a recent promotion exercise in the NPF.

    The CP said there were two petitions against the activist.

    He said, “The two petitions against Omoyele Sowore were shown to him right in my presence. One bordered on forgery of a police document, which he published online, and we all know the position of the law. It is your duty to provide a source of how you came about the forged document. The second petition has to do with cyberbullying.

    Read Also: NLC, Atiku demand Sowore’s release

    “The two petitions were shown to him in the presence of his lawyers. The issue now is that he refused to make a statement in the presence of his lawyers. It is in the record.

    “And the procedure under the Nigerian law is very clear. When an allegation is made against you, you are called upon; you have a duty to put down your own position.

    “The same law that gives him the right to remain silent also gives the police the responsibility of certain duties to do when somebody who has been accused of an offence decides not to talk, which you’re also aware of. And I believe we’re professionals, and I believe the procedure as laid down by the law is being followed.

    He said Sowore was not forced to make a statement despite his alleged refusal, adding that, “He has the right to remain silent and the police also have the duties and responsibilities under the law to follow certain procedures once a suspect decides to keep mute. We won’t say because you have decided to keep mute, you can go, no.”

    When asked by a lawyer why Sowore was being detained beyond the constitutional limit of 24 hours, the CP said, “We are professionals, we are following the provisions of the law. Everything needed to be followed under the law in keeping somebody from being followed”.

    Shogunle offered to take a few protesters to where Sowore was being held to show that he was not being brutalised.

    He said, “The law is being followed regarding his apprehension and detention. He came himself, and the moment he refused to make a statement, his arrest was ordered”.

    They were later dispatched.

  • Women’s rights group decries Sowore’s attack on policewomen

    Women’s rights group decries Sowore’s attack on policewomen

    Women’s advocacy group, HerRights Watch, has condemned what it described as “a calculated, misogynistic and false campaign” by SaharaReporters Publisher, Omoyele Sowore, to demonise women in the Nigeria Police Force, especially those serving in the office of the Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun.

    The group described the article recently published by SaharaReporters, which sought to scandalise female officers, especially ACP Bukola Kuti and  DSP David Victoria, as “a shameless, sexist smear built on malicious gossip rather than credible journalism.”

    The Convener of HerRights Watch, Onyinye Eze, in a strongly worded statement, expressed dismay at the choice of Sowore to turn what is essentially an institutional issue of police promotions, which is even overwhelmingly skewed towards male officers, into a personal attack on a few women who have distinguished themselves in service just because he seeks to impress his paymasters who have enlisted him to consistently attack the IGP.

    “Is Sowore suggesting that women have no right to serve in sensitive positions or be recognized for their exceptional work and contributions to society? Is he implying that a woman’s competence and progress can only come through illicit means? That line of thinking is not only deeply offensive but also regressive and dangerous,” Eze said.

    “The criteria for accelerated promotion are well-established, for instance  any officer who wins Police Service Merit Award on two occasions automatically qualifies. The lady in question followed the same process because she merited it. Furthermore, contrary to the misleading claims in the article, she has been in service for well over 10 years. Can anyone reasonably claim that the same IGP has been responsible for all her promotions over the years when she has only worked with him for less two years?

    “As further proof of Sowore’s malicious intent, the report falsely alleged that the promotion list was skewed in favour of officers from the South West. However, a thorough review of the list shows that officers from the North Central were, in fact, the top beneficiaries of the exercise.”

    Eze pointed out that although the majority of officers promoted by the Police Service Commission in the referenced list were men, Sowore chose to build his entire narrative around a handful of women, dragging their names in the mud without presenting verifiable facts.

    Read Also: My redeployment has no link with Sowore’s protest, says Ondo CP Afolabi

    “This is not investigative journalism; this is misogyny wrapped in a failing attempt to undermine the leadership of the police by targeting women as easy scapegoats and collateral damage,” she said.

    She further challenged the credibility of the so-called “sources” relied on by SaharaReporters, noting that the article dripped with innuendos, insinuations and stereotypes that demean the dignity of women in uniform, adding that “You cannot claim to be fighting for justice or accountability when your own report is a textbook example of character assassination and gender profiling.”

    Eze, while expressing deep concern, noted that Sowore has long demonstrated troubling attitudes toward women. “It is, unfortunately, not surprising that Sowore would take this path,” she said. “There have been consistent concerns about his treatment of women in both his private and public life. It seems the same disregard for respect and dignity in his personal relationships is now reflected in the way he engages through his platform.”

    “Here is a man who calls himself a human rights activist, yet he cannot hide his hatred for women, especially those in positions of responsibility. His SaharaReporters platform is increasingly being used not to expose corruption, but for racketeering.”

    Eze called on Nigerians to reject the attempt to turn women into scapegoats in institutional controversies, adding that if the promotions in the Nigeria Police Force are flawed, the process can be addressed without maligning hardworking and deserving women who are caught in the web. She added that if male officers were promoted without merit, would Sowore insinuate they got there through sexual favours?

    In any case, it is on record that the incumbent Inspector General of Police, IGP Kayode Egbetokun, has refused every attempt to encourage indiscriminate special accelerated promotion in spite of the humongous pressure from every quarter. Hence, he set up criteria, guidelines and a process for qualifying for a special promotion which was strictly adhered to on this matter.

    She advised other journalists and media platforms to be responsible and gender-sensitive in their reporting, calling on media regulatory bodies, the Nigeria Police Force, Nigerian communication Commission and human rights institutions to investigate the defamatory content of the SaharaReporters article and protect women in public service from malicious attacks based on their gender.

    “We cannot allow this kind of journalistic recklessness to go unchallenged. It breeds a hostile environment for women and reinforces the culture of impunity, where men can say and write anything against women without consequences. Enough is enough,” she declared.