Tag: Stockholm

  • The Stockholm syndrome

    IN 1973, there was the famous bank robbery at the Norrmalmstorg Square in Stockholm, Sweden, which resulted in a hostage crisis best known as the origin of the ‘Stockholm syndrome.’ This syndrome is the psychological condition whereby a victim of kidnapping or hostage-taking shows up a curious feeling of trust and affection towards his/her captor, while simultaneously growing rebellious towards potential rescue authorities such as the police. In the particular case of the 1973 Stockholm robbery, there was a hostage who became romantically attached to one of her captors and serially frustrated moves by security forces to secure her freedom.

    Recent developments in the Nigerian political space symptomised the Stockholm syndrome at its patronising and cronystic best. The governed, or at least a significant portion, seem in sedate thrall to the power elite who hold the levers of power in unyielding captivity. Rather than put those power actors to task by calling them to painstaking account on their past and present stewardships, and setting reasoned terms for fresh issuance of power mandates ahead of the coming poll, the governed are falling over heels in sycophantic offerings to the governing elite.

    At the last count, about a dozen principal political office holders have ostensibly been prevailed upon by grassroots admirers to pitch for another term in the public offices they presently occupy, or indeed higher ones, in the 2019 general election. In a number of cases these supporters, who ordinarily are on the lower rungs of the economic ladder, preemptively threw in humongous sums to underwrite party nomination forms priced at cut-throat rates, and as well other election expenses, as their modest way of getting the political principals going.

    Only last week, President Muhammadu Buhari received presidential nomination forms of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) with a price tag of N45million, which was procured and donated by a group of supporters. “Just now at the State House, I was presented with the APC presidential expression of interest and nomination forms by the Nigeria Consolidation Ambassadors Network (NCAN). A mixture of familiar faces, as well as new ones, united by a common vision of a secure and prosperous Nigeria,” he announced on his @MBuhari twitter handle.

    Also last week, a delegation of the Rice Farmers Association of Nigeria brought in a cheque of N56.8million to the APC leadership as support for the president’s campaign.

    Earlier on in the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar openly dissolved in tears when a group of supporters donated the party’s N12million presidential nomination forms to him. Without that donation, he could well have borne the cost of hundreds of those forms and not dent his vast resources.

    It isn’t only at the presidential level there have been munificent offerings by economic stragglers to political deep pockets. Barely two weeks ago, Deputy Senate President Ike Ekweremadu announced that a coalition of his tribesmen took him unawares by donating PDP’s N3.5million senatorial nomination forms to him. “They presented me the PDP nomination forms…requesting that I return to the Senate in 2019. My people, my primary employers, have spoken. I have no choice than to humbly accept to run for the Senate again,” he said.

    And early last week, a group of cattle traders along with some independent petroleum marketers procured APC’s N22.5million governorship nomination forms to compel Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai’s outing with a declaration that he would seek re-election in 2019. Among others, Niger State Governor Abubakar Sani-Bello was as well treated to an offering of the ruling party’s expensive nomination forms by supporters who pressed him to seek re-election.

    Even with the heavy clouds hanging over his choice of political platform, House of Representatives Speaker Yakubu Dogara last week in Abuja received supporters at whose apparent behest he gave in to seeking yet another term in the legislative chamber where he is presently serving out his third four-year term. Although he was yet to pick the nomination forms, Dogara said he had thought to call it quits but was prevailed upon by the supporters to the contrary.

    Talking strict legality, it is debatable that the various donations of nomination forms as well as funds for election expenses – as with rice farmers’ N56.8million cheque for Buhari’s campaign – complied with the provisions of the Electoral Act 2010 (as Amended), which is the subsisting law. Section 91(9), for instance, stipulates a cap of one million naira donation by any singular entity to candidates; but it might be argued that politicians now on the gravy train are aspirants yet to emerge as candidates. Section 92(1) of the same law, however, defines election expenses as costs incurred “within the period from the date notice is given by the (Independent National Electoral) Commission to conduct an election, up to and including the polling day in respect of the particular election.” INEC issued the said notice on August 17; and as such, all expenditures from that time henceforth, including the recent donations of forms and funds, could well be reckoned as election expenses to which statutory ceilings apply. But that is just by the way.

    The topical issue here is more the morality than legality of the donations. It is curious, for instance, that supposed grassroots citizens are stampeding with huge donations to well-resourced political actors in a country of some 180million people where more than 87million live in extreme poverty, according to the World Poverty Clock.

    In June, the Brookings Institution had named Nigeria the world’s poverty capital, having overtook India that previously held the position. Even if we disregard Brookings’ status report, as the government counseled, we have the account of British Prime Minister Theresa May who late in August said Nigeria was home to the highest number of “very poor people” in the world. May spoke in Cape Town, South Africa, during an African tour of which Nigeria was one of her call ports. But a more objective indicator, perhaps, is the Poverty Clock at the World Data Lab in Vienna, Austria, which stated that as at June 2018, 44.2 percent of Nigerians were living in extreme poverty. Living in extreme poverty is defined by the World Bank as living under $1.90 (N684) per day.

    The extent of responsibility of respective political actor in incurring or mending this economic condition is without doubt arguable. But preemptive offerings by supposedly struggling citizens to ease these actors’ way in/into power is a different ball game. Notice that the donations are not exactly the same as pennyworth contributions typically mobilised by candidates from throngs of faceless individuals as a gesture of conviction in the merit of their platform, as is common to developed democracies. Ours is a situation whereby supporters step out to be seen with their offerings by beneficiary power actors.

    Nigeria’s tax authorities may need to do a reality check on how well these generous donors have met their tax obligations under the law. But that is by the way. A more important issue is that if the country’s economy is what it is reported to be, those donations proved Theresa May’s point that though our economy is thriving, it is not inclusive. “Much of Nigeria is thriving, with many individuals enjoying the fruits of a resurgent economy. Yet 87million Nigerians live below $1 and 90 cents a day, making it home to more very poor people than any other nation in the world,” the British leader had said. In such circumstance, the onus is on government to more diligently pursue inclusive growth of the economy.

    Another dimension to this curious trend is the morality of power actors unquestioningly accepting the said donations. It is hugely doubtful that the donors are free givers who desire nothing in return, and the obvious catch is an expectation of dedicated patronage when their favoured political actors are settled in power. If they ever have their way, the joke is on the anti-graft labours of the present administration.

     

    • Please join me on kayodeidowu.blogspot.be for conversation.
  • World water week 2017: African ministers spotlight wastewater management

    World water week 2017: African ministers spotlight wastewater management

    African Water and Sanitation Ministers attending the 2017 World Water Week in Stockholm, have resolved to adopt and promote effective wastewater management across the continent

    In a statement at the opening plenary in Central Stockholm, the ministers underlined the importance of wastewater to the region’s aspirations for economic growth and sustainable development.

    The statement was made available to News Agency of Nigeria on Tuesday in Abuja.

    According to them, improved wastewater management is not only critical to achieving the Africa Water Vision 2025 and the Sustainable Development Goal on clean water and sanitation (SDG 6), but also to other goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

    Gerson Lwenge, the Tanzanian Minister for Water and Irrigation and President of the African Ministers’ Council on Water (AMCOW), recalled that African ministers responsible for sanitation took proactive steps before the end of the MDGs era in 2015 by adopting the N’gor Declaration.

    He said it entailed a commitment that Africa would “progressively eliminate untreated waste by encouraging its productive use”.

    He said to actualise the potentials of turning waste to benefits Africa needed to create the right policy environment and move from policy to effective implementation.

    “It is on this basis that the High-Level Ministerial Panel at this year’s Africa Focus Sessions will explore possibilities of using science to enrich policy making and increase policy implementation efficiency,” the AMCOW president added.

    The Senegalese Hydraulic and Sanitation Minister, Amadou Faye, said that this year’s World Water Week and by extension the Africa Focus Sessions would provide a global platform for the ministers to “discuss policy options and enabling factors that support the adoption and implementation of innovative wastewater management approaches and technologies.

    Dr Mohamed Abdel-Atty, the Egyptian Water and Irrigation Minister and AMCOW Vice President for North Africa, said AMCOW was committed to achieving an Africa where there were equitable and sustainable use and management of water resources for poverty alleviation and socio-economic development.

    “With improved wastewater management particularly in the industrial and agricultural sectors, Africa will be on the firm path to food security and sustainable development”, he said.

    AMCOW’s Executive Secretary, Dr Canisius Kanangire, said faecal sludge and wastewater continually pose threats to human livelihood especially in African cities experiencing population growth due to rural to urban migration.

    According to Kanangire, experiences by AMCOW member states show that wastewater can be a resource for irrigation with basic treatment and proper hygiene practices; sludge can be used as a source of energy, and fertilizers.

    “The productive use of waste water can generate income, development of micro enterprise and employment, as well as contribute to urban food and energy security. The threat, therefore, could be turned into opportunities for poverty alleviation” Kanangire said.

    AMCOW brings together Water and Sanitation ministers from 55 African countries to promote cooperation, security, social and economic development and poverty eradication among member states through the effective management of the continent’s water resources and provision of water.

    The World Water Week, organised by the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI), is an annual gathering for all stakeholders in the globe’s water issues.

  • World water week: Nigerian officials act prudent at event

    World water week: Nigerian officials act prudent at event

    Nigeria undoubtedly has the smallest entourage at this year’s World Water Week (WWW) in Stockholm, Sweden, which is in an apparent reflection of the new mood of the government on accountability and probity,

    Officials from the Federal Ministry of Water Resources numbered only five. Last year, there were more than 30 officials who attended the event.

    But this also means Nigeria is missing in action at the WWW. The annual conference which celebrates its 25th anniversary is being sponsored by the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI).

    The conference which attracted more than 3,000 participants from over 120 countries is the world largest gathering of water and development experts with countries around the world eager to showcase their commitment to water and sanitation issues.

    This year, Nigeria has no formal presence. Usually, the Federal Ministry of Water Resources would operate a booth for Nigeria to showcase the achievements of the country in Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) issues and try to attract more global participation in that sector.  Nigeria however operated no booth and in the absence of Nigeria, South Africa and Kenya have maintained dominance at the conference.

    But the leader of the team from the Federal Ministry of Water Resources, Mr. Ikpeawajo  Reginald, who is  the Director, Dams and Reservoir Operations said the reason is to cut costs.

    “The government is trying to streamline activities and cut costs. We are also trying to guard against irrelevances and frivolities of the past to ensure that only those who are really relevant to what is happening here are allowed to come here,” he said.

    Ikpeawajo said only the five officials with specific duties and relevance to the conference travelled to Sweden. “Those of us here have specific role and bearing on what is happening here.

    “Even though we are not many, but we will learn from the other participants how they have been able to solve their WASH issues and also take ideas and recommendations home to Nigeria,” he said.

    Also in a departure from the “jamboree” which for many years have characterized Nigeria’s participation at international conferences, Nigerian officials appeared very prudent and business like and it was difficult tracking them down together at the same time.

    “We are all here to learn, we have our different duties so there is no time for jamboree,” one of the officials said.

    [news_box style=”2″ display=”category” link_target=”_blank” category=”77″ count=”10″ show_more=”on” show_more_type=”link” header_background=”#eaeaea” header_text_color=”#36594e”]

  • Fear of Buhari cuts Nigeria’s conference attendance

    Fear of Buhari cuts Nigeria’s conference attendance

    [dropcap]I[/dropcap]n an apparent reflection of the new mood of the government on accountability and probity, Nigeria has the smallest entourage at this year’s World Water Week (WWW) in Stockholm, Sweden. Officials from the Federal Ministry of Water Resources numbered only five. Last year, there were more than 30 officials who attended the event.

    But this also means Nigeria is missing in action at the WWW. The annual conference which celebrates its 25th anniversary is being sponsored by the Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI).

    The conference which attracted more than 3,000 participants from over 120 countries is the world largest gathering of water and development experts with countries around the world eager to showcase their commitment to water and sanitation issues.

    This year, Nigeria has no formal presence. Usually, the Federal Ministry of Water Resources would operate a booth for Nigeria to showcase the achievements of the country in Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) issues and try to attract more global participation in that sector.  Nigeria however operated no booth and in the absence of Nigeria, South Africa and Kenya have maintained dominance at the conference.

    But the leader of the team from the Federal Ministry of Water Resources, Mr. Ikpeawajo  Reginald, who is  the Director, Dams and Reservoir Operations said the reason is to cut costs.

    “The government is trying to streamline activities and cut costs. We are also trying to guard against irrelevances and frivolities of the past to ensure that only those who are really relevant to what is happening here are allowed to come here,” he said.

    Ikpeawajo said only the five officials with specific duties and relevance to the conference travelled to Sweden. “Those of us here have specific role and bearing on what is happening here. Even though we are not many, but we will learn from the other participants how they have been able to solve their WASH issues and also take ideas and recommendations home to Nigeria,” he said.

    Also in a departure from the “jamboree” which for many years have characterized Nigeria’s participation at international conferences, Nigerian officials appeared very prudent and business like and it was difficult tracking them down together at the same time.

    “We are all here to learn, we have our different duties so there is no time for jamboree,” one of the officials said.

    [news_box style=”1″ display=”category” link_target=”_blank” category=”256″ count=”8″ show_more=”on” show_more_type=”link” header_background=”#0f0f0f” header_text_color=”#f2f2f2″]