Tag: Subsidy removal

  • Tinubu kept his campaign promises on subsidy removal

    Tinubu kept his campaign promises on subsidy removal

    Mr  Pius Akuta, Executive Secretary/CEO, Nigerian Shippers Council (NSC) says President Bola Tinubu kept to his campaign promise by removing fuel subsidy.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Tinubu announced the removal of subsidy on petrol immediately he was sworn in on May 29, 2023.

    “The very first day, he took a very bold initiative to remove fuel subsidies, which many of you have written and condemned in the past.

    “We don’t know if other people would have had the courage to go ahead and remove it.

    “All the presidential candidates at that time promised to remove the fuel subsidy but, for this President has displayed that capacity to do what he said,” he said.

    According to him, Tinubu, in the last two years, took some bold steps, taking some policy directions that are shaping the economy.

    He said that the country`s foreign reserves were in a bad shape when the current administration took over the government, adding that now there is significant growth.

    Akutah said that the president acknowledged that there was hardship, but he stuck to that policy which has brought a lot of gains in the way of government business today.

    “Even at the sub-national levels. You know that state governments have more money now; local governments have more money due to that policy direction.

    “We need to commend President Tinubu for that initiative, which has put more money at the sub-national level for capital projects to spring up.

    Read Also: Why Tinubu priotises MSMEs – Shettima

    “We are seeing many states executing many projects, capital projects, and huge infrastructural developments going on in so many states,” he said.

    He said that for Tinubu to have acknowledged developments in opposition states means he is eager to see the country developed in terms of infrastructure.

    “It doesn’t matter whether you are in his party, but the moment you are doing the right thing, he will stand with you, and he acknowledged that publicly.

    “The GDP was at one very low and the growth was very slow and sluggish before President Tinubu assumed office,” he said.

    (NAN)

  • How we are using cash from subsidy removal, by Tinubu

    How we are using cash from subsidy removal, by Tinubu

    • Infrastructure, human capital getting attention

    • Akpabio, Abbas: shunning audit queries, summons affront to democracy

    Those questioning the usage of the funds accruing to the government from the removal of petrol subsidy got an answer yesterday.

    The money is being used for the development of infrastructure and building of human capital, the Federal Government said yesterday.

    The accruals into the federation account have more than doubled since 2023 after President Bola Ahmed announced that “fuel subsidy is gone” during his inauguration speech.

    The funds are shared among federal, state and local governments.

    The amount shared monthly, which hovered around N9 billion during the Buhari government, is now an average of N1.6 trillion in the past two years.

    “Since petrol subsidy removal, we have redirected those funds into targeted interventions, expanding our social safety nets, improving public transportation, and financing critical infrastructure.

    “Most importantly, we have strengthened our fiscal buffers, making Nigeria more resilient to external shocks,” President Bola Ahmed Tinubu said yesterday.

    Speaking through Minister of State Finance, Nkiruka Uzoka-Anite, the President added: “For far too long, Nigeria’s economy has been burdened by structural inefficiencies, fiscal leakages, and an overreliance on oil revenues.

    “But we are not here today to dwell on the challenges of the past. We are here to chart a new course.

    “In 2022 alone, Nigeria spent over N4 trillion on fuel subsidies, more than we allocated to capital expenditure.

    “This was not only physically unsustainable, it was unjust.

    “A subsidy that disproportionately benefited the affluent, encouraged smuggling, and bred inefficiency was neither equitable nor strategic.”

    READ ALSO: Meet the next Olubadan-in-waiting, ex-Gov Rashidi Adewolu Ladoja

    The President spoke in Abuja during the opening of a National Conference on Public Accounts and Fiscal Governance, organised by the Public Accounts Committees (PACS) of the Senate and House of Representatives.

    Last month during President Tinubu’s visit to his state, Nasrawa State Governor Abdullahi Sule also told those asking how subsidy money is being spent to visit the state and see the infrastructure that his government has undertaken.

    Yesterday, the President spoke further on how his government is transforming the economy.

    He said: “These reforms are designed to widen the tax base by integrating the informal sector, simplify compliance for small and medium-sized enterprises, digitise revenue collection to reduce human interference and eliminate leakages, and harmonise multiple taxes to make doing business easier in Nigeria”.

    Describing the new tax system as “a governance imperative,” President Tinubu noted that Nigeria is laying the foundation for a self-sustaining economy that gradually moves away from dependence on oil revenues to a more diverse and inclusive revenue base.

    The President also emphasised economic diversification as a top policy objective, naming agriculture, manufacturing, digital services, renewable energy, mining, and the creative economy as focal sectors receiving targeted investments and reforms.

    He referenced new initiatives like the National Credit Guarantee Company, which aims to support local production, empower SMEs, and boost non-oil exports.

    “These efforts go beyond mere economic metrics.

    “They are creating jobs, fostering innovation, building economic resilience, and strengthening our national security and long-term stability,” the President said.

    On monetary policy, President Tinubu acknowledged the Central Bank’s efforts in stabilising the naira, taming inflation, and coordinating effectively with fiscal authorities.

    “There is better coordination now between the fiscal and monetary side, and we are determined to reduce inflationary pressures by addressing structural bottlenecks, particularly in food supply chains.”

    The President affirmed that transparency and accountability are non-negotiable, citing steps taken to digitise public finance systems through platforms such as the Integrated Payroll and Personnel Information System (IPPIS), the Government Integrated Financial Management Information System (GIFMIS), and the Open Treasury Portal.

    “These platforms ensure that public funds are traceable, public officers are accountable, and the Nigerian people are empowered with information.

    “We must move from opacity to openness, from suspicion to confidence,” he declared.

    President Tinubu called on the National Assembly, especially the Public Accounts Committees, to uphold their constitutional duty with “integrity, courage, and independence.”

    House of Representatives Speaker Abbas Tajudeen, raised the alarm over Nigeria’s unresolved fiscal infractions, revealing that over N300 billion in public funds flagged by audit reports remain unrecovered.

    Abbas, represented by House Leader, Julius Ihonbvere, described the situation as unacceptable and warned that fiscal responsibility cannot thrive where audit queries are routinely ignored without consequence.

    Senate President Godswill Akpabio urged the Public Accounts Committees (PACs) of the National Assembly to assert their constitutional powers in enforcing transparency and accountability in government, warning against the growing trend of non-compliance with legislative summons.

    Represented by Senator Abdul Ningi, Akpabio emphasised that Nigeria’s progress is inseparable from effective fiscal oversight, which is the central mandate of the PACs.

    “The Public Accounts Committees are not just legislative creations, they are constitutional bodies empowered by Sections 80, 81, and 88 of the Constitution to act as watchdogs of public funds.

    “They have the power to summon any individual, public or private, to account for the use of government resources,” he said.

    Akpabio lamented the lack of responsiveness by some agencies and individuals to invitations from the legislature, describing it as an affront to democracy and the rule of law.

    Chairman of the Senate Committee on Public Accounts, Senator Aliyu Wadada, affirmed that the 10th Senate remains fully committed to open budgeting and prudent spending, and is working to review outdated fiscal legislation.

  • Nigeria saved $10b from subsidy removal in 2023 – Deputy Speaker

    Nigeria saved $10b from subsidy removal in 2023 – Deputy Speaker

    Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Benjamin Kalu has said that the decision of President Bill Ahmed Tinubu to remove subsidy on Premium Motor Spirit (PMS) otherwise known as petrol, saved about 10 billion dollars for the country in 2023.

    Kalu who spoke at a meeting with some investors and a group of scholars at Oxford University in London also disclosed that efforts by the Tinubu government to promote economic growth and development have led to a significant increase in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) into the country worth about $6.4 billion in 2024.

    A statement signed by the Chief Press Secretary, Levinus Nwabughiogu quoted the Deputy Speaker as saying that the policies of the government have also led to a 22% increase in dollar remittances from Nigerians in the diaspora, totalling $28 billion in 2024.

    Kalu who is the head of a delegation from the House to the ongoing UK-Nigeria Parliamentary Strategic Dialogue, including Chris Nkwonta, Ginger Onwusibe and Ibe Okwara spoke on four key areas of politics, security, economy and development.

    Others at the parley included Dr. Christopher Nwadiba, Fellow at Oxford University; Dr. Dyedra Morrissey, Lecturer at Said Business School, Oxford University; Dr. Nwirivu Rupara, Engr. Jackson Offor and Ms. Sandra Elias, all of Oxford University.

    According to the Deputy Speaker, the subsidy removal has enabled the government to redirect funds to critical sectors such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, adding that the economic gains from the subsidy removal have been complemented by other notable achievements, including a 3.19% increase in Nigeria’s GDP in Q2 2024.

    Read Also: Why fuel subsidy removal was necessary, by Tinubu

    He explained that Tinubu’s administration has made significant strides in the areas of politics, security, economy and development which reflected the Legislative Agenda of the 10th House of Representatives.

    Kalu highlighted the strengthening of democratic institutions through legislative reforms, including the passage of the South East and North West Development Commission Acts.

    He stressed that the government has also enhanced electoral integrity through technology-driven processes, leading to increased political engagement among Nigeria’s youth.

    On security, the Deputy Speaker said there has been a 47% reduction in incidents of banditry in the North-West between Q2 2023 and Q4 2024, adding that collaborative operations between the Nigerian Armed Forces and regional counterparts have resulted in the capture of over 1,500 insurgents in the Lake Chad Basin.

    In the development sector, the Deputy Speaker said that the government has launched various initiatives aimed at promoting technological advancement and innovation.

    He revealed that the National Digital Economy Policy (2023-2030) will increase internet penetration from 49% to 70% by 2027 adding that the launch of the Nigeria Start-Up Act has also spurred tech innovation, securing over £300 million in venture capital funding in 2024.

    Kalu assured that more economic opportunities abound in Nigeria for investors, asking them to consider the country as the next business destination, while calling for international collaborations to strengthen socio-economic advancements in the country.

  • Subsidy removal: Economic imperative or social burden?

    Subsidy removal: Economic imperative or social burden?

    Sir: In recent months, the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) has significantly raised the price of petrol, leading to widespread concern among citizens and stakeholders alike. The removal of fuel subsidies, which had long been a contentious issue, was finally implemented by President Bola Tinubu’s administration, resulting in a market-driven pricing mechanism.

    The removal of fuel subsidies was a long-advocated policy by economic experts and international financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. They argued that subsidies were a drain on government resources, often benefiting the wealthy more than the poor and encouraging corruption within the fuel distribution system. From this perspective, the subsidy removal is seen as a necessary step to reform Nigeria’s economy and free up resources for developmental projects.

    However, critics argue that the government failed to adequately prepare the populace for the inevitable shock of subsidy removal. The absence of social safety nets or palliatives to cushion the blow has left many Nigerians feeling abandoned by their government. The immediate impact has been harsh, with inflation rising to unprecedented levels, and many households struggling to afford basic necessities.

    The NNPCL’s role in the recent price increases has also been criticized. As the national oil company, its ability to influence market prices raises questions about the effectiveness of competition in the newly deregulated market. Many Nigerians fear that without sufficient checks and balances, the NNPCL and other major players might exploit the situation to maintain high prices, keeping fuel out of reach for the average citizen.

    Read Also: JUST IN: Former minister Usman becomes Labour Party’s caretaker chairman

    In the long term, the Dangote refinery could be a game-changer for Nigeria’s petroleum industry. The refinery’s ability to meet a substantial portion of domestic fuel demand could force market prices down due to increased competition, even with NNPCL’s market dominance. Moreover, Dangote’s integrated supply chain—from crude oil refining to the distribution of finished products—could ensure more efficient operations and lower production costs, benefits that could be passed on to consumers.

    Additionally, Dangote’s strategic investments in infrastructure, such as its own pipelines for crude oil and products, help reduce logistics costs, further driving down prices. The refinery’s success could also inspire confidence among other private investors, leading to more investments in the oil and gas sector, which has long been dominated by public enterprises with a history of inefficiency and corruption.

    However, the refinery’s success is not guaranteed and will depend on various factors, including the government’s regulatory framework, global oil prices, and Dangote’s ability to manage operational challenges. Yet, with the right support and policies in place, the Dangote refinery could provide a much-needed solution to Nigeria’s perennial fuel supply challenges and ease the burden on Nigerians grappling with high fuel prices.

    The recent fuel price increase by NNPCL and the removal of subsidies have undoubtedly placed a heavy burden on Nigerians, particularly the poor and middle class. While the policy shift is economically justified, its execution has been less than ideal, leaving many citizens struggling to cope with the resulting inflation and economic instability.

    For now, the situation remains precarious, and the government will need to carefully balance its fiscal policies with the needs of its citizens. Ensuring that the benefits of the Dangote refinery and other reforms reach the populace will be key to maintaining public trust and avoiding further economic and social unrest.

    •Usman Abdullahi Koli,mernoukoli@gmail.com.

  • We are on course on subsidy removal – FG

    We are on course on subsidy removal – FG

    The federal government on Friday, March 8, said it is on course on fuel subsidy removal.

    It also said that it is working assiduously to ensure the price stability of fuel in the overall interest of Nigeria.

    The International Monetary Fund had alleged that the government still maintains subsidies on fuel pump prices and electricity tariffs despite President Bola Tinubu announcing the removal of subsidy.

    The special adviser to the president on energy, Olu Verheijen, who spoke at the ministerial press briefing in Abuja, said it is the prerogative of the government to maintain price stability.

    She argued that the developed countries including the United States do the same to prevent volatility in the economy.

    She therefore said government intervention to stabilise prices does not remove the fact that subsidy has been removed.

    She said: “The question of subsidy, the subsidy was removed on May 29, 2023. However, the government has the prerogative whether the US, in the West and other Eastern countries, all governments have the prerogative to maintain price stability and prevent social unrest.

    “So if prices are moving, they reserve the right to intervene. It started in the US during COVID. There were a lot of expansionist moves but also subsidies.

    “All governments deserve that right. And so if for whatever reason the administration has reviewed that it is not the right time to have prices continue to fluctuate given the level of hardship in the country, given inflation, the government has the right to intervene intermittently.

    “All governments do so but it does not take away the fact that the subsidy was removed.”

    Read Also: Declare a state of emergency now!

    On tapping the country’s gas potential, Verheijen pointed out that part of the objective of the fiscal incentives that the President recently signed is to reverse the over 70% undeveloped gas reserves.

    To do this, she said: “We need to address the fundamental issues in sectors so that we can attract capital to the infrastructure and there is no one who’s going to invest in Infrastructure if they don’t have assurance, the line of sight to the attractiveness of gas supply.

    “So, if gas suppliers are not making any investment because the fiscal terms of the business environment is a very difficult one in which to invest, then it will be difficult to continue to mature mainstream projects and downstream projects because you have to deal with the ab initio problem which is gas supply.

    “And that is exactly what President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has done by fast-tracking this policy directive to ensure that we have sufficient gas supply whether we’re trying to export, whether we’re trying to compress natural gas or liquefied for domestic use, whether we’re trying to have floating energy as an alternative way of getting gas into the market, all of those things are enabled by these policies.”

    She also revealed that “There is a fund that exists and is ready to make investments in infrastructure.

    “There are lots of investors who are very interested in making investments in infrastructure, but it’s like building a road without having a car to drive with it. You cannot invest in infrastructure to compress gas if there is no gas. “

    She stressed that the needed investment is to be done in a short while, saying, “because we are trying to signal to investors to make these investments as quickly as possible. But each directive has its timeline.”

    She however explained that the president’s directive “is a signal to all the participants and stakeholders to move as quickly as he has.”

    “These incentives that we just passed will also allow us to ensure that they’re still alive on train seven which is almost far from its construction.

    “From those investors’ perspectives until those fundamental investment decisions that they have taken assured supply by some of the actions we’ve taken this week.

    “It is the government’s role to set strategic objectives around where it’s trying to go. As a country. We’ve outlined our strategic objective, which is to grow production so that we can grow revenue and use that revenue to enable economic opportunities for more and more Nigerians.

    “So the divestments have to be two parties who have the technical and financial capacity to deliver on all those objectives.

    “So they will need to have the technical and financial capacity not only to send demand but also to grow production so that we can have more revenue and more opportunities for Nigerians.”

    On pricing of cooking gas, she explained that “A significant portion of our gas is being imported. So we are price takers and not price setters.”

    She however said: “Because the president was very concerned about the cost of living, he approved the fast-tracking of fiscal incentives to enable more investments into the LPG space with the hope that if we achieve scale, we can bring down costs. And we can also incentivize the domestication of some of our LNG production. We started it, but unfortunately, foreign exchange and the market prices began to increase.

    “We’re going to continue to work and look at more opportunities to improve supply and scale up and enable all LPG into the market at affordable prices. It’s a priority of this administration.

    “On the latest executive order signed by the President, Verheijen stressed that the ambition of the administration is “to accelerate our economic growth and diversify the economy for the benefit of all Nigerians require timely, credible, clear and consistent policy.”

    While admitting that the administration is faced with a revenue crisis, she however said: “President Bola Tinubu is actively seeking ways to grow revenue and forex to stabilize our economy and currency.

    “The Oil and Gas sector is critical to our ability to do so.”

    She, however, added: “Our current oil and gas production and investment levels fall significantly short of our potential.

    Reeling out statistics of the country’s unfavourable contribution to gas production in the continent, she said, “Since 2016, Nigeria has only accounted for only four percent (4%) of

    Africa’s total oil and gas investments, despite possessing thirty-eight percent (38%) of the continent’s hydrocarbon reserves. A society is not rich because of its resources but because of what it does with those resources.”

    She however said President Tinubu is determined to reverse “this trend and take decisive steps to ensure to conducive business climate and reposition Nigeria as a preferred investment destination for the oil and gas sector.”

    She added: “To achieve these objectives, Mr President has issued a Presidential Directive to streamline and clarify the scope of the two Regulators in the petroleum sector to provide certainty and create a conducive business environment.

    “Directed the NSA and Special Adviser on Energy to coordinate enhanced security measures in the Niger Delta. Owing to this directive, the TNP pipeline which had been repeatedly vandalized is now enjoying improved uptime; availability has practically doubled since these directives were implemented.

    “This has translated to increased liquids of over 200,000 barrels/day being transported over the last 6 months. It has increased the availability of NLNG Trains 1-6 from 57% in 2023 to 70% in Q1 2024.

    “The President has also introduced fiscal incentives to deepen Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and Liquified Petroleum Gas (LPG) penetration. These incentives were designed to: Use the impact of fuel subsidies on transportation cost and enable the displacement of PMS/Diesel and; contribute to stabilizing the price of cooking gas in the market and support the transition to clean cooking.”

    On other reforms to improve the investment environment, she said: “Following extensive engagements, analysis, and benchmarking, with industry operators and regulators, the President has taken further action to address foundational issues identified in the course of these engagements. Mr President has initiated the amendment of primary legislation to introduce fiscal incentives, reduce project execution timelines, and promote cost efficiency.

    “However, recognising the urgency to accelerate investments to stabilise the economy, His Excellency executed these Policy Directives to signal the policy direction of this administration to both the market and regulators.

    “The Policy Directives are “Fiscal Incentives for Non-Associated Gas (NAG), Midstream and Deepwater Oil & Gas Developments: This Directive aims to facilitate the monetization of Nigeria’s extensive oil and gas resources. For Gas, 76% of our gas reserves, remain undeveloped.

    “This explains why, despite possessing one of the largest gas reserves globally, we lack sufficient gas to meet our domestic need for industry, for power, and cooking.

    The fiscal incentives introduced will attract the much-needed investments to enhance energy security, catalyze economic activity, attract essential foreign exchange, and promote job creation.

    “Streamlining of Contracting Processes, Procedures, and Timelines: The president has issued directives to reduce contracting timelines and project delivery. Benchmarking and analysis revealed that the contracting cycle takes up to 36 months.

    “This Directive should have the effect of compressing this cycle to less than 6 months in line with global averages.

    “This will expedite the delivery of oil and gas products to the market and enhance overall value for the country.

    “Local Content Practice Reform: This Directive Seeks to ensure that local content requirements are implemented in a manner that does not impede investments or the cost competitiveness of oil and gas projects.

    “This Directive aims to reduce the cost premium of operating in Nigeria, presently averaging at 40%.

    “We anticipate significant benefits from this reform, including the development of local companies’ capacity, thereby generating additional business opportunities, job creation and boosting economic growth and implementing Partners.”

    The presidential aide stressed: “Our need to fuel economic growth at rates that significantly exceed our population growth rate has never been more urgent.

    “The President strongly believes that private sector-led growth enabled by clear and inclusive government policies is the most enduring path to prosperity for all Nigerians. We will sustain engagement and collaboration with key investors to ensure we attract capital and capabilities to this sector to catalyze job creation, productivity, and income growth across multiple sectors.

    “This administration is focused on enabling transformational economic opportunities to lift millions of hardworking Nigerians out of poverty.”

  • Subsidy removal: Residents resort to using Ox-drawn carts in Katsina

    Subsidy removal: Residents resort to using Ox-drawn carts in Katsina

    Following the removal of the fuel subsidy, some residents of Daura in Katsina State have resorted to using Ox-drawn carts in conveying their goods.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that during a visit to their park, some residents were seen using the Ox-drawn carts in conveying their goods.

    Some of those using such ancient means of transportation, said they were forced to do that due to the high cost of the conventional means, occasioned by  subsidy removal.

    Some riders of the Ox-drawn carts said that their businesses are now booming because of more patronage by low-income earners in the town.

    Read Also: Subsidy removal: Council splashes N30m on 1000 residents

    Malam Kabir Adamu, who use the Ox-drawn carts, said he resorted to the carts just to cut costs and reduce the burden and pressure on him.

    According to him, “I decided to abandon the conventional means of transportation because I can’t afford it, the cost is triple what we normally pay.

    “Therefore, it’s necessary for us to choose an alternative way of moving our goods from one place to another, which we can afford to pay.

    “We are now struggling for what to eat, because prices of goods are no longer affordable like before.”

    Malam Muhammad Sani, an ox-drawn cart rider, said although this mode of transportation has been in existence for about 50 years, he has never seen such huge patronage until now.

    “Many people, especially the low-income earners, are no longer using vehicles to convey their goods due to the high cost, except when they are taking such goods far away from town.

    “Because of this, they are now patronizing us and business is now bringing in more money,” he disclosed.

    According to him, in spite of the state government’s effort in providing more and affordable means of transportation, the people are still having challenges in conveying their goods.

    (NAN)

  • Subsidy removal: Council splashes N30m on 1000 residents

    Subsidy removal: Council splashes N30m on 1000 residents

    By Muinat Ajibade-Alasela

    The Oriade Local Council Development Area, Lagos State, has given N30 million to over 1,000 less privileged people and widows in the council.

    The council Chairman, Ramotallai Akinlola-Hassan, earmarked N5 million from the cash for 50 widows.

    Each of the beneficiaries went home with N25,000.

    Akinlola-Hassan said the gesture was in furtherance of cushioning the fuel subsidy removal.

    She said the cash was aimed to support the widows’  small scale businesses.

    Read Also; Easing Yuletide travel burden

    She described their deceased’s husbands as who are “political and community heroes.”

    The council boss informed the gathering that a son of a party chieftain killed during the 2021 Local Government electioneering campaign got N1million.

    She added that the palliatives’ distribution to the vulnerable within the council area would continue quarterly till the end of her tenure.

    She explained that the exercise was carried out during the Yuletide to enable residents cope with the rising cost of food and celebrate the season in good mood.

    Akinlola-Hassan appealed to the beneficiaries to make judicious use of the largese.

    She stressed that her mission  after taking the oath of office was to uplift the people of the council.

    While saying that the dividend of democracy would be extended to every residents, she assured those yet to benefit from the poverty alleviation scheme that her administration would take care of their interest.

    The beneficiaries expressed appreciation to the council boss and pledged support to her policies and programmes.

  • Subsidy removal – What went wrong?

    Subsidy removal – What went wrong?

    • By Peter Okediya

    As of this moment, fuel prices have surged towards the N1000 mark, and the dollar to naira exchange rate has surpassed N1000. Palliative measures appear ineffectively sporadic, while the NNPC has once again assumed its role as the primary fuel importer, with assurances of no imminent fuel price hike. This shift raises questions about the previously advocated market-based pricing approach. Some argue that the removal of subsidies is leading to daily savings in the trillions. However, it’s essential to recognize that the concept of subsidy, while not as it was traditionally understood, still persists. This time, it operates in a different context even though fuel prices are substantially higher. This describes the journey thus far.

    In view of the above and the government’s frequent policy reversals, there is a need to have a close look at the management of subsidy removal by the current administration. What factors have contributed to the inconsistencies in subsidy removal? What really went wrong? 

    In the realm of economic policy, both subsidies and their removal represent strategic manoeuvres, and their efficacy is inherently tied to efficient management. These policies yield positive economic outcomes when properly implemented and affordable. Subsidies become problematic when their cost places an excessive burden on government revenue, leading us to question their viability. Likewise, when the promised benefits of subsidy removal fail to materialize for the general population, there is often a desire to revert to the subsidy system. In essence, the effectiveness or inadequacy of both these policy instruments is primarily a result of management decisions.

    A wrong notion that followed the removal of subsidy was that it benefited only the rich and the elite. Curiously, this notion was often perpetuated by some political figures who presented themselves as modern-day Robin Hoods. However, the reality that emerged after the subsidy’s removal shed new light on the situation. It became evident that subsidy removal had far-reaching consequences that extended well beyond merely affecting the wealthy.  Transportation costs surged, the prices of essential food items and commodities skyrocketed, inflation reared its head, and poverty deepened. It was clear that subsidy removal was not a simple wealth redistribution mechanism; instead, it disproportionately burdened the less affluent. While the affluent managed to weather these economic shifts, ordinary citizens found themselves sinking deeper into financial hardship.

    Characterizing subsidy removal as a noble attempt to ‘eat the rich’ obscured the core issues tied to the abrupt announcement by the president. This is fundamentally an economic matter that transcends political rhetoric and calls for a more comprehensive evaluation.

    Read Also: Why Tinubu must allocate gains from subsidy removal to vulnerable health fund, by Reps

    In the context of the government’s approach to subsidy removal, there is a concern regarding the prevailing tendency among public servants to address economic challenges primarily through short-term palliative measures. While cash transfers and palliatives serve as valuable stop gap solutions, they often provide only temporary relief and typically lack the substantial impact needed to uplift the average person facing financial hardship. In July when the Nigerian Labour Congress intended to embark on strike action because of the hardship from high fuel prices, the president addressed them promising to disburse various kinds of money to mitigate the hardship, all without a clear strategy for equitable distribution. The NLC took this as a form of compensation despite being aware that palliatives mostly end up in the hands of corrupt persons. When the government predominantly resorts to addressing pressing economic problems through short-lived remedies, it signals a potential absence of the robust commitment needed to resolve the issue comprehensively.

    Another fallacy that began to spread was that the Nigerian economy does not support economic theories. People found it easy to discredit the laws of demand and supply, often treating Nigeria as an exception. They see a bad economic decision and blame the adverse effects rather than hold the decision makers accountable. The subsidy removal initiative initially encompassed multiple components, including a unified exchange rate, the deregulation of the petroleum sector, and the end of NNPC’s fuel importation monopoly. Regrettably, as of today, none of these supplementary measures remain in effect. The exchange rate has surged, impeding importers’ access to foreign exchange, and NNPC has reverted to its role as the exclusive fuel importer. 

    Subsidy removal fails in the absence of prudent and accountable management during the transition towards a market-determined pricing system. While the president’s address may have been perceived as sincere and heroic if fuel pricing were solely a domestic concern, the complex truth is that fuel prices are intrinsically linked to international oil prices. Failing to consider the wider implications of geopolitical factors and global price fluctuations, subsidy removal can impose a significant burden on our citizens, as we are currently witnessing. 

    Subsidy removal fails where inefficiency, leakages, wastes and widespread corruption persist. The original intent behind subsidy payments has often been eroded by systemic corruption and mismanagement. Transitioning from the subsidy era to subsidy removal is hindered when institutional corruption remains pervasive. Additionally, issues like oil theft and cross-border fuel smuggling continue to plague the industry. As a result, Nigeria struggles to meet its OPEC quota of 1.8mb/d and consistently produces below 1.4mb/d. This production shortfall means that the increase in global oil prices doesn’t necessarily translate into higher foreign exchange earnings, and the Nigerian naira remains vulnerable to depreciation. 

    Subsidy removal fails where the Excess Crude Account (ECA) is tapped out. The ECA represents one of the critical accounts where the Nigerian government accumulates surplus revenues resulting from discrepancies between the budgeted benchmark crude oil price and the actual international market prices for a given year. Conceptually, the ECA was conceived as a financial buffer to shield the country from the volatile fluctuations of global oil prices, particularly in today’s turbulent geopolitical landscape.

    However, the current state of the ECA, which stands at a mere US$473,754.57 is indicative of its near depletion. This situation leaves the nation vulnerable to the ripple effects of distant geopolitical events and erratic oil prices. At its core, a robust ECA would help stabilize the national currency, rendering it less volatile, and would alleviate the need for the NNPCL to intervene on a weekly basis in response to price fluctuations. With a well-funded ECA, the foreign exchange market would operate more smoothly, mitigating the challenges faced by fuel marketers in sourcing foreign exchange as market dynamics would tend to self-correct following volatile periods.

    Subsidy removal fails when refineries fail. Refineries are supposed to be available for oil marketers to buy directly and sell to the Nigerian market. However, the current dependence on imported fuel places substantial strain on our foreign exchange (FX) demands, thereby exerting considerable pressure on exchange rates and foreign reserves. It’s evident that foreign exchange rates play a pivotal role in determining the landing costs of fuel. Marketers, quite understandably, cannot buy PMS at a high foreign exchange rate and then sell it at a lower pump price. As the naira weakens, the landing costs of fuel in local currency surge, leading to an increase in the costs associated with subsidy removal, which in turn triggers a corresponding rise in pump prices. Effective subsidy removal strategies are most feasible when our currency is stable, and foreign exchange can be accessed without undue complications. Even when our refineries are functioning optimally, it is important to note that crude oil is still priced in dollars because upstream producers primarily transact in this currency. Implementing subsidy removal before addressing foreign exchange control is like attempting to put the cart before the horse. The sequencing of these actions is essential for an effective strategy.

    Way forward

    Subsidy has to go. However, the current strategy has led to increased fuel prices and uncontrolled hardship, with the state oil company bearing the brunt of the cost to prevent even steeper price hikes. This essentially means that despite the intention to remove subsidies, the current approach has not achieved the desired results and has created fiscal complexities.

    Complete removal of subsidies would indeed result in higher fuel prices than today. However, the implementation of subsidy removal by the current administration was marred by certain missteps. A phased approach, combined with efforts to reduce government expenditures (including political appointments), curb oil theft, and establish effective relief measures for the commercial sector and vulnerable populations, could have yielded a more favourable outcome. Additionally, the introduction of tax incentives such as VAT and personal income tax exemptions, rather than focusing solely on keeping fuel prices low, could have ensured a more sustainable transition. While international factors affect fuel prices, a comprehensive strategy would help prevent us from regressing to the starting point (or a worse situation).

    • Okediya is an energy policy analyst and a sustainable finance thought leader with background in law. 
  • Subsidy removal: Adamawa unveils shuttle buses, other items for palliative intervention

    Subsidy removal: Adamawa unveils shuttle buses, other items for palliative intervention

    The Adamawa state government has unveiled 1,058-seater shuttle buses at a total cost of N1.06 billion to implement the transport component of its fuel subsidy removal palliative programme.

    The government said the initial procurement would shortly be followed by smaller buses to service routes that the 10 buses would not cover.

    The government has also ordered trucks of rice, corn and other items for proposed distribution at 50 percent subsidised prices to the people.

    This was disclosed by the committee charged with handling the palliative programme, which said the buses were delivered at the weekend while the trucks of ordered rice, corn and other food items would be arriving anytime thenceforth.

    Read Also:  Residents loot Bayelsa palliative warehouse

    Making a comprehensive unveiling of the palliative programme at the Government House in Yola, Secretary to the State Government, Awwal Tukur, who doubles as chairman of the palliative committee, said the intervention programme would provide succour in areas of transport as well as subsidised food and non-food items to people in all the 266 wards of the state.

    Tukur said: “To ensure that everyone is covered, the distribution of the palliatives will be done in wards, with local government areas with a high number of wards receiving higher packages.”

    He said although the state has received N2bn of the N5bn intervention expected from the federal government, the government acquired the 10 Innoson buses with state resources while rice worth more than N1bn was ordered from the N2bn so far accessed from the federal government.

  • IPMAN commends FG on new price of petrol

    IPMAN commends FG on new price of petrol

    Alhaji Abubakar Maigandi, the Vice President, Independent Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN), has commended the Federal Government on the new pump price of petrol.

    Maigandi told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Wednesday in Abuja that the decision would help to put to an end the persistent petrol scarcity in the country.

    “This is a good development; the best that will happen is complete removal of the subsidy.

    “The price they put is a good one, but the best thing is to leave the market open so that people will decide what they want to sell after importation,” he said.

    He assured that the products would be available with this development, adding that the association was ready to continue to support government’s effort.

    NAN reports that the Petroleum products Pricing Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) has announced a new pump price of N145 per litre for petrol.

    A statement signed by Mrs Sotonye Iyoyo, the Acting Executive Secretary of PPPRA, said that the new price would take immediate effect

    “In furtherance of its mandate to ensure the efficient supply and distribution of petroleum products, PPPRA hereby announces, effective immediately, that the new price band for PMS shall be at a maximum of N145 per litre.

    “However, NNPC retail stations on the outskirts of major cities are advised to sell at price lower than N145 per litre,” it said.

    The statement said that the review became imperative in the face of extreme difficulties faced by petroleum product Importers in sourcing foreign exchange.

    This, it added, had made it difficult to meet the consumption demand of the nation.

    “Importers will henceforth be permitted to source for their foreign exchange requirements from the secondary sources.

    “PPPRA is conscious of the difficulties that Nigerians have been going through in the last few months.

    “To ameliorate this situation, we shall continue to modulate pricing in accordance with prevailing market dynamics thereby ensuring fair value to all citizens,” it said.