Tag: Subsidy

  • Jonathan seeks N161.6b more for fuel subsidy

    Jonathan seeks N161.6b more for fuel subsidy

    Nineteen days to the end of the year, President Goodluck Jonathan is asking the Senate to approve over N161.6 billion supplementary fuel subsidy budget for this year.

    Over N880.3 billion was set aside for payment of fuel subsidy in the budget.

    But, in a December 5 letter to Senate President David Mark, entitled “Request for supplementary budget for 2012,” Dr. Jonathan said the N7.7 billion left of the N880.3 billion would not be enough for subsidy payment for the remaining days of the year.

    Senator Mark read the letter on the floor of the Senate yesterday.

    The cash will help to maintain a steady flow of petroleum products, especially in the run up to the festive season, according to the President, who hopes that the Senate will consider the request expeditiously.

    The letter reads: “The Distinguished Senate President will recall that as part of the 2012 budget framework, a provision of N888.1 billion was made for payment of fuel subsidy for the nation.

    “I wish to intimate the Distinguished Senate of the fact that following the forensic audit carried out, the provision for fuel subsidy in the 2012 budget was underestimated.

    As at now, the sum of N880,264,243,683.61 billion has been paid out, leaving a balance of N7, 735, 756, 316: 39 billion.

    “In order to accommodate the outstanding arrears resulting from the forensic audit exercise and the remaining period of the 2012, an additional sum of N161, 617, 364, 911 billion over and above what was programmed in the 2012 framework is required.

    “Given the need to maintain a steady flow of petroleum products, especially in the run-up to the festive season, it is my hope that the distinguished senators will kindly accord this request their traditional expeditious consideration and approval.”

    It is not clear the consideration the lawmakers will give to the request, considering the unresolved controversy over fuel subsidy payments.

  • Governors sue President for subsidy cash

    Governors sue President for subsidy cash

    Governors have sued President Goodluck Jonathan to Supreme Court for alleged fuel subsidy fraud.

    The governors are aggrieved that part of the monies meant for the Federation Account are diverted by the Federal Government to fund the fuel subsidy – illegally.

    Besides, they are worried that the fuel subsidy record is wrapped in secrecy, even as the subsidy claim is deducted without the budget line.

    In the writ of summons filed by former Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) President, Joseph Daudu (SAN) and Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), the governors accused the Federal Government of over invoicing and under remittance of crude sales between 2007 and this year.

    Other lawyers in the suit are H.O Afolabi, Atilola Popoola, P.B Daudu and Adedayo Adedeji.

    The Defendants are the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mohammed Adoke (SAN) and the National Assembly.

    In their statement or claims, the Plaintiffs averred that when they collect revenues, they make such remittance without making any form of deductions from the revenue so collected, despite the fact that they also incurred expenses in the course of collecting and remitting the revenue to the Federal Government.

    The plaintiffs averred that between 2006 and last year, total government expenditure on fuel subsidy amounted to N3.7 trillion.

    The governors said they shall at the trial prove the accuracy of the figures quoted.

    The Plaintiffs averred that the Federal Government, as a matter of practice does not provide a budget line for petroleum subsidy payments, but rather sets a nominal amount as appropriation for the Petroleum Support Fund, which is the vehicle for paying the subsidy claims.

    Querying the method of payment, the governors stated that “the Federal Government between 2006 and 2011 showed a tendency to make extra budgetary appropriations not approved by the (National Assembly).

    “Therefore over the last few years there has been a disparity in relation to the amounts appropriated for fuel subsidy payments in the national budget and the actual payments made in those calendar years.”

    The governors averred that “there are inaccuracies in the crude oil and gas revenues remitted to the Federation Account by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), caused by wrongful deductions at source by the NNPC to fund her operations.

    Besides, they posited that subsidy claims ought to be remitted to the NNPC from the Petroleum Support Fund (PSF) by the Federal Ministry of Finance, based on claims from oil marketers approved by the Petroleum Products Pricing and Regulatory Agency (PPPRA).

    Referring to a November 22, 2010 report of the Federal Ministry of Finance, entitled “the Interim Report on the Process of Forensic Review of NNPC”, the governors contended that the actual remittance of proceeds for domestic crude sales to the Federation Account is far less than the amount expected.

    They want the court to direct the Federal Government to pay their 24% share of the total amount of money wrongly deducted by the Federal Government from the Federation Account from 2007 till date.

    They also want Federal Government to pay back into the Federation Account all illegal deductions made from the Federation Account all in the name of fuel subsidy.

    They also demanding that the (AGF) be directed to give account of all subsidy claim deducted from the Federation Account from 2007 till date.

    The Plaintiffs averred that the practice of paying the fuel subsidy from the crude oil account by the NNPC with the authority and approval of the AGF is “unconstitutional” and a “ flagrant contravention of Section 162(1) of the 1999 Constitution because crude oil money ought to be remitted with zero deductions into the Federation Account.

    They averred that as a result of deliberate delays of receipts of subsidy advice from PPPRA, which normally results in under-remittance of domestic crude sales proceeds into the Federation Account, there was over deduction in 2007, 2008 and 2009 which was estimated at N2 billion, N10,3 billion and N16.2 billion.

    The governors accused the Federal Government of using the NNPC to deduct from the crude sales without approval, to fund the fuel subsidy claim, as if same is a first line charge.

    This action, the governors said, is illegal and contrary to the provisions of Section 80 and 162(1) of the 1999 Constitution as amended.

    The Plaintiffs accused the NNPC of usurping the functions of the PPPRA as the latter is made to honour unverified vouchers from Importers of petroleum products.

     

  • N1.4b subsidy scam: EFCC  insists suspects must face trial

    N1.4b subsidy scam: EFCC insists suspects must face trial

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday told a Federal Capital Territory High Court that it has enough evidence to put three suspects on trial for alleged N1.4billion fuel subsidy scam.

    The suspects are Helyn Aninye, Chizobam Ben-Okafor and Pon-Specialized Services Limited.

    They are being tried before Justice Olusumbo Goodluck for offences bordering on forgery and obtaining money under false pretence.

    A statement by the Head of Media and Publicity of the EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren said: “The suspects were to have been docked on an 18-count criminal charge on November 26 but their pleas could not be taken as their counsel, Olisa Agbakoba (SAN) opposed their arraignment on the grounds that the proof of evidence did not disclose a prima facie case against his clients.

    “My lord, assuming there are offences to be disclosed, they have not in any way been linked to the applicants, and these links must have a prima facie elements to the applicants.”

    “He further said that in a case of forgery, it is required to be proved in a particular way and that no maker of the alleged forged document had been called or identified.

    “But Steve Odiase, counsel to EFCC in his application for leave to prefer criminal charge against the accused persons under Section 185 (b) of the Criminal Procedure Code, noted that the proof of evidence speaks for itself.

    “He stated that the prosecution has formulated three issues for determination by the court in granting the application which include whether the proof of evidence discloses an offence known to law and whether there is a linking of the charge to the applicants.

    “My lord, the statement of one (name withheld) of Quality Marine Services limited is enough link to the accused persons.

    “Besides, it has been established that in a case of forgery the accused must not be the maker of the said document before being liable.”

    “The judge who advised counsel not to jump the gun by addressing issues in the substantive case, adjourned to February 21, 2013 for ruling on both applications.

    “The accused persons were said to have on or about the 3rd day of March, 2011 at Abuja within the Jurisdiction of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja with intent to defraud, conspired to obtain N1.413, 507,951.50 under false pretence from the Federal Government of Nigeria as subsidy for the importation Premium Motor Spirit under the Petroleum Support Fund”.

    “The offence according to the charge sheet was contrary to Section 8(a) and punishable under Section 1 (3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Related Offences Act. 2006.”

     

  • Minister linked with N2.7bn subsidy scam

    Minister linked with N2.7bn subsidy scam

    • Tension in presidency as EFCC probes unregistered firm

     

    There is disquiet in the Presidency over a ‘close’ relationship between a serving minister and a firm which was indicted for N2.7billion oil subsidy claims.

    The firm, Pinnacle Contractors Limited, is unknown to law as it was not registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) before engaging in phony fuel importation and smiling to the banks with N2.7billion.

    There were strong indications that the company was used for slush funds by some powers that be for “a certain purpose.”

    The ‘strange’ company is one of the 25 firms recommended for criminal investigation by the Federal Ministry of Finance.

    The company received subsidy payments in 2011 without importing any fuel.

    It was gathered that anti-corruption agencies are currently probing the status of the company and those behind it.

    But it was learnt that preliminary findings have shown that the affected agencies are also looking into a “close link” between a minister and the ‘strange’ company which was 22 on the list of firms due for criminal investigation.

    A reliable source in one of the anti-graft agencies, who spoke in confidence, said: “Pinnacle Contractors Limited is one of the firms we are probing as part of the fuel subsidy scam. There are issues concerning its ownership, registration by CAC and its legal existence.

    “We are also trying to unravel the directors of the said company in order to establish those who will face trial for the N2.7billion subsidy scam. We are still on the case.

    “What we are doing is to investigate these companies in batches because many issues were involved in tracking the subsidy fraud.”

    Responding to a question, the source added: “There have been insinuations that a member of the Federal Executive Council has links with the company but we are still probing this angle.

    “The challenge at hand is that in terms of ownership, there seems to be a link with a member of the Federal Executive Council. But on the surface, it is a flat situation. We are to dig beneath the surface and that is what we are doing.

    “At the end of our investigation, we will be able to clarify whether the said firm is owned by a serving government official or not and how it came about the N2.7billion fuel subsidy claim.”

    Another source added: “A search in CAC has so far confirmed that only Pinnacle Company Nigeria Limited is registered.

    “It was actually registered on September 18, 1981 with registration number RC. 8740. Its registered office is given as 12, Iwehen Street, Benin City, Edo State. The directors are Samuel Okhorutomwen Uwadie and Samuel Omorodion Uwadie.

    “Certainly, it is not an oil firm but it is in business for general goods. Therefore, it has no relationship with this Pinnacle Contractors Limited that we are investigating.

    “Whatever is the case, we are determined to unravel those behind Pinnacle Contractors Limited which claimed N2.7billion as subsidy in 2011.”

    But findings revealed that investigation might have suffered a setback because the suspected minister was one of those mandated by President Goodluck Jonathan to draft white papers on the three reports meant to clean the oil sector.

    One of the sources said: “There is that suspicion against the minister but since we have not reached a conclusive bend, you cannot say he or she should not perform his or her statutory duties as a member of the Federal Executive Council.

    “All I know is that we are looking into issues bordering on those behind the ‘oil’ company.”

    The President had raised white paper committees on the reports of the Petroleum Revenue Special Task Force, the National Refineries Special Task Force and the Governance and Controls Special Task Force.

    The Anti-Corruption Network, a non-governmental organisation headed by a former member of the House of Representatives, Dino Melaye, had protested to the Federal Ministry of Finance in Abuja to ask for the legal status of the company.

  • Jonathan: fuel subsidy to go

    Jonathan: fuel subsidy to go

    NIGERIANS were told yesterday to brace up for a full deregulation of the petroleum industry’s downstream sector.

    Fuel prices range from N100 per litre to N110 and N130 in many states – no thanks to supply problems. Motorists are grumbling.

    But the situation may get worse – price-wise – going by Dr. Goodluck Jonathan’s speech yesterday.

    In his view, full deregulation of the downstream sector is the solution to fuel shortage.

    The popular thinking is that deregulation will bring higher prices; the government insists it will not. The policy, says the government, will ensure regular supply and free some cash to rebuild the country’s infrastructure.

    To Dr. Jonathan, to attract investors, who will build refineries and end importation of petroleum products, subsidy must go.

    The President spoke in Abuja when he received the report of the graduating participants of the Senior Executive Course 34, 2012 of the National Institute of Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, at the Presidential Villa.

    The government, in January, announced the deregulation of sector, but its action, which pushed up petrol price, was greeted by massive protests. The plan was dropped, with fuel price rising to 97per litre.

    Nigeria’s four refineries in Port Harcourt, Warri and Kaduna are working at about 30 per cent capacity. The remaining 70 per cent of the nation’s need is imported.

    The President noted that only if people could bear the pain, total removal of fuel subsidy would make Nigerians happier.

    He likened the process of transforming a nation to surgery, which could be painful but would make the patient healthier at the end.

    “Why is it that people are not building refineries in Nigeria, despite that it is a big business? It is because of the policy of subsidy, and that is why we want to get out of it.

    “To change a nation is like surgery. If you have a young daughter of five years who has a boil at a very strategic part of the face, you either, as a parent, leave that boil because the young girl will cry or you take the girl to the surgeon.

    “So, you have the option of just robbing mentholatum on the face, until the boil will burst and disfigure her face or you take that child to the surgeon. On the sighting of a scalpel of the surgeon alone, the child will start crying.

    “But if she bears the pains, after some days or weeks, the child will grow up to be a beautiful lady.”

    “There are certain decisions that government must take that may be painful at the beginning and people must be properly informed so that they will be ready to bear the pains,” he said.

    The President expressed optimism that Nigeria will achieve a turnaround in fortune within 10 years, with the right policy.

    He said: “I believe that you do not need a lifetime to change a nation. Under 10 years, Nigeria can change and people will not even believe that this is Nigeria again. Immediately you come up with strong policies in key sectors of the economy and keep it for 10 years, the change will be astronomical.”

    Comparing Nigeria and Canada on the running of refineries by the graduants, said Canada has 16 functional refineries and Nigeria has four that are struggling to refine at 30 per cent of installed capacity because all the refineries in Canada are privately-owned.

    “Immediately you made that statement, I sent a note to my Chief Economic Adviser to tell me the ownership structure of the refineries in Canada. I wanted you to tell us why they are working. He replied that all the refineries in Canada are private sector owned, with strong public sector regulatory regime and this is the key thing,” he said.

    The President, who also commented on the debts being owed by NIPSS, especially N105m tax arrears, said it is a criminal offence for any agency of government to deduct employees’ taxes without remitting same to authorities.

    “It is a problem in this country, whether you are an agency of government or not, you must deduct tax and if you fail to remit it, it is a criminal offence. We do not encourage departments of government to deduct tax and keep it,” he said.

    The NIPSS participants described the precarious security situation as a disincentive to business in their report entitled: “Resource diversification for sustainable economic development in Nigeria”.

    They identified unemployment as one of the causes of insecurity and urged the government to address it.

    “One of the greatest threats to security is unemployment. It provides for unemployed youths and other disgruntled persons to attack the system which they believe is responsible for their plight,” the report said.

    In tackling the scourge, the NIPSS participants called on the government to strengthen trans-border security through bilateral agreements.

    They returned a damning verdict on the nation’s airports, saying they all lack the capacity to counter terrorism.

    The airports, according to them, are characterised with porous perimeter fences without Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV).

    “The nation’s aviation sector is not robust enough for diversification,” they said.

    They said the maritime sector is over dependent on foreign carriers.

    The NIPSS graduates urged the media to be objective and responsible in their reportage.

    For the country to successfully diversify, government must strengthen its security apparatus, they said.

    The participants also decried the situation in which the nation is over-dependent on crude oil and natural gas.

    “Nigeria needs to reduce its level of dependency on crude oil and expand development of its rich non-oil sectors. Human resources is key to diversification.”

    They said research and development were required to improve the economy.

    They said good governance is critical to resource diversification.

    In that regards, they urged the President to ensure that the terms and conditions of the Performance Contract Agreement he recently signed with his ministers are strictly enforced.

  • Reps seek Fed Govt’s subsidy on malaria drugs

    Members of the House of Representatives yesterday urged the Federal Government to provide subsidy on the importation of Atemisimin Combination Treatment (ACT), drug to enable Nigerians have easy access to it.

    The House also directed its Committee on HIV/AIDS and Malaria Control to carry out in-depth studies on malaria and advise the House accordingly.

    It urged the Federal Government to consider the use of effective malaria drugs that malaria parasites are not resistant to in the country’s bid to roll back malaria.

    These resolutions were sequel to the adoption of the prayers of a motion brought before the House by a member, Uzoma Nkem-Abonta.

    The lawmaker in his lead debate noted that “malaria affects over 100 million of Nigeria’s estimated 140 million population, with over one million Nigerian children between ages one-five dying of malaria each year.

    Approximately 60 per cent of all cases of malaria occur among the poorest 20 per cent world’s population, with young children and women at the highest risk of malaria infection and mortality.

    “From the above World Health Organisation (WHO) certified statistics, malaria kills more people than HIV/AIDS, or any other killer disease,” he said.

    He regretted the lack of political will to fight the scourge by government, citing the allocation of N200 million in 2008 and zero budget allocation for the procurement of ACT anti-malaria drugs and monotheraphies in 2009.

    According to him, subsequent budgetary provision for malaria treatment has steadily been on the decline, which he noted is responsible for the near collapse of the country’s health system.

    He said there is need for deliberate action towards addressing the problems of inadequate personnel, lack of equipment, infrastructure, importation of sub-standard and or counterfeit drugs, among others.

  • N382b fuel subsidy fraud:  EFCC grills 11 more marketers

    N382b fuel subsidy fraud: EFCC grills 11 more marketers

    •Trial likely next week

    More than 11 marketers were yesterday grilled by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in connection with the N382billion fuel subsidy fraud uncovered by the Presidential Committee on Verification and Reconciliation of Fuel Subsidy Payments.

    The committee was headed by the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Access Bank Plc, Mr. Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede.

    Some of the marketers might be arraigned before the Lagos High Court of Justice next week.

    According to investigation, the affected oil marketing and trading companies (OM&T) were grilled for six hours in Abuja on the contentious N382billion subsidy cash.

    It was learnt that some of the marketers had hectic time explaining why they benefited from subsidy payment without importing fuel.

    Others faced the panel on inflation of subsidy funds accruable to some OM &T; irregular payment; sheer fraudulent cases; abuse of process; short-time certificate issues.

    A source, who spoke in confidence, said: “We quizzed some big marketers, who had been indicted by the Presidential Committee. We have been interacting with them and conducting discreet investigation into their role in subsidy fraud.

    “We have established some cases against them and fairness requires that we should grill them with facts and figures available to the anti-graft agency.

    “So, as we were asking them questions, the lot fell on them to defend allegations of how they cooked records against them. Some of them were also grilled on inflation of imported products and why they got subsidy funds in excess of what they ‘purportedly imported.’

    “For this batch of marketers, whom we interacted with for six hours, we are on the last lap of the investigation into their activities.

    “The next stage is criminal prosecution of marketers and companies involved in the subsidy fraud.”

    Replying a question, the source added: “Going by the network of syndicates involved in the scandal, it is not a case you can handle overnight.

    “I can confirm to you that we have made tremendous progress in our investigation.

    “I think some of the suspects might be arraigned next week before Lagos High Court of Justice after the conclusion of this lap of investigation.”

    The source however refused to disclose the identities of the marketers that were quizzed yesterday.

    The source simply said: “I think by next week, we will unveil these suspects who will face trial.”

    The Head of Media and Publicity of the EFCC, Mr. Wilson Uwujaren, who spoke with our correspondent, said: “As part of our ongoing investigation into the subsidy payments, this commission interacted with some marketers in Abuja .

    “But I do not have the details. The commission will make relevant information available as it has always done.”

     

  • Subsidy: EFCC to file amended charge against Ahmadu Ali’s son, others

    Subsidy: EFCC to file amended charge against Ahmadu Ali’s son, others

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Tuesday said it intended to amend the theft charge preferred against Mamman Ali, son of former Peoples Democratic Party national chairman, Ahmadu Ali.

    EFCC counsel, Mr. Francis Usani, made this known at the resumed trial of the younger Ali before Justice Adeniyi Onigbanjo of a Lagos High Court in Ikeja.

    The News Agency of Nigeria reports that the accused was charged to court for an alleged N4.4 billion fuel subsidy fraud.

    He was arraigned on July 26 alongside Christian Taylor, a citizen of Sierra Leone, and Nasaman Oil Services on a three-count charge of conspiracy and obtaining by false pretences.

    Usani said the amended charge would enable the commission to join another oil marketer, Oluwaseun Ogunbambo, as a co-defendant in the matter.

    He said:”The matter was adjourned till today for commencement of trial but we cannot proceed today because some very important issues have come up.

    “We feel that it will help the court in doing justice to this matter.

    “I want to inform the court that we intend to file an amended charge to enable one Oluwaseun Ogunbambo to be joined as a co-defendant.

    “Some of the transactions the defendants were charged with were actually orchestrated by him, and so we feel it will be in the interest of justice to try him with them.”

    Usani therefore urged the court to adjourn the matter to enable the EFCC file the amended charge.

    Counsel to the defendants, Mr. Toyin Pinheiro (SAN), did not oppose the call for adjournment, but maintained that his clients were innocent of the charge.

    “Since the prosecution’s excuse for an adjournment is for a just cause, we will not be opposing.

    “Their plan to amend the charge shows that the defendants have no case to answer,” Pinheiro said.

    The judge adjourned the matter to November 12 for trial.

     

  • Reps kick over unutilised  N120bn subsidy fund

    Reps kick over unutilised N120bn subsidy fund

    • May restructure SURE-P mandate

     

    The House of Representatives has discovered N120billion in the coffers of the Subsidy Re-Investment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) unutilised. The Reps are unimpressed by the situation especially when there are hundreds of projects across the country in need of the agency’s intervention.

    The agency, headed by Dr.Christopher Kolade, was set up early in the year by the Federal Government to execute projects that will cushion the effects of the partial removal of fuel subsidy on the generality of Nigerians.

    The Reps are shocked that the agency has is yet to fully utilise funds allocated to it from the partial withdrawal of fuel subsidy. The organisation has a budget of N180 billion fort his year out of which it has accessed N120b.

    The chairman of the SURE-P Committee, Kolade, reportedly told the House Committee on Petroleum Resources (Downstream) that it had disbursed N37b since July to contractors handling its various intervention projects while it plans to spend another N20b by the end of this month.

    At the meeting with the committee, he said one of the reasons for the inability of the committee to fully utilise its funds is the process of settling contractors handling its projects.

    He said: “We have to comprehensively verify job done by the contractors before we pay and that is part of the reasons why we haven’t been able to go faster than where we are now. We want the fund to affect the lives of Nigerians positively in line with its mandate, so we do not want to pay for what we cannot confirm”.

    The House Committee expressed concern over interventions by the programme in projects already being handled by ministries, noting that it amounts to paying for inefficiency and corruption. The lawmakers said Nigerians are eager to see interventions by the Programme distinct from MDAs like the defunct Petroleum Trust Fund (PTF).

    The chairman of the House Committee, Dakuku Peterside, however, urged Nigerians to be patient with the organisation as the House would do all it can to make the programme impactful.

    He said: “Before they were inaugurated the government had identified areas of intervention and had to mind where those finds would be deployed for intervention but we sincerely believed that it could have been done diffidently. We, however, have to look that up again and take it up at our Committee level and of course make a proposal to the House.

    “To assess SURE-P from the perspective of the short period they have been in existence, one might have a different impression. We have to look at it from the perceptive of their mandate.

    “If we look at their mandate against their performance so far, you will come to the same conclusion that they have done well. But what we are saying is that there is something fundamentally wrong with that mandate and that mandate should change. The process should change.

    “At our Committee level, we will look at the mandate and its process critically to see whether the structure is giving us the desired result or not, is the best for the Nigerian people and whether it is meeting the aspirations of the generality of our people. There are questions that must be answered.”

    On the legality of the SURE-P that was raised by some of the lawmakers during the meeting, Peterside pointed out that the President has the power to put in place mechanisms to actualise his missions and SURE-P is one of such.

    “We realise that SURE-P is one of such vehicles established to actualise the objective of channeling the funds realised from the partial removal of fuel subsidy to the amelioration of the lot of Nigerians.”

  • EFCC arraigns four for N1.05 b subsidy fraud

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) yesterday arraigned four suspects for alleged N1.05billion fuel subsidy fraud.

    Saminu Rabiu, Jubril Rowaye, Alminnur Resources Limited and Brila Energy Limited were arraigned before Justice Adebukola Banjoko of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja on a 17-criminal count charge of conspiracy, forgery and obtaining N1.05billion under false pretence.

    A statement by EFCC’s Head of Media and Publicity, Wilson Uwujaren, said the accused were arraigned for allegedly defrauding the Federal Government.

    The statement said the suspects allegedly submitted some forged documents and obtained the sum from the Petroleum Support Fund as subsidy for the importation of 10,000 metric tonnes of Premium Motor Spirit (petrol).

    “When the charges were read to the accused, they all pleaded not guilty. Barristers R.O. Unnah (Counsel for first and third accused) and Ajibola Oluyede (Counsel for second and fourth accused) prayed the court to grant them bail.

    “The prosecution counsel, Sylvanus Tahir, did not oppose the application but urged the court to impose stringent conditions ,which will ensure that the accused are available for trial.

    “Justice Banjoko granted bail of N10million and two sureties.

    “One of the sureties must be a director in the Civil Service. Both sureties, who must be resident in Abuja, are to swear an affidavit of means and produce evidence of tax payment in the past three years.

    “In addition, the accused must deposit their international passports and three passport photographs each with the court.

    “She adjourned the case till November 29 and 30 f and ordered that the accused be remanded in custody until they meet their bail conditions.”