Tag: suspension

  • PDP suspends Borno state chairman

    PDP suspends Borno state chairman

    The national leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has suspended the chairman of the Borno state chapter, Alhaji Baba Basharu for conducts which the party said were inimical to the progress of the party.

    The suspension order, which was conveyed through a statement on Wednesday by the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh, said Basharu also flouting provisions of article 58 (1), (b), (c), (f) and (h) of the party’s constitution.

    The statement said, “After preliminary hearing on reports of various activities inimical to the progress of the party, especially flouting the provisions of article 58 (1), (b), (c), (f) and (h) of the PDP constitution, the National Working Committee (NWC) has suspended the Borno State chairman of our great party, Alhaji Baba Basharu.

    “The above is in line with the relevant provisions of the PDP constitution on disciplinary procedures.

    “Accordingly, Alhaji Baba Basharu has been referred to the National Disciplinary Committee for appropriate action in line with the provisions of the constitution of the PDP.”

    Meanwhile, a former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Senator Bala Mohammed has attributed the PDP’s crushing defeat in the 2015 general elections to impunity, arrogance and lawlessness.

    Mohammed, who is one of the contenders for the position of the party’s national chairman, stated this on Wednesday when he led a delegation of his supporters to the PDP national secretariat.

    Pledging his loyalty to the National Chairman, Alhaji Ali Modu Sheriff, the former minister commended the chairman for his doggedness, saying Sheriff did not have the negative traits that caused the party’s defeat.

    He declared his willingness to mend fences with two former governors of his native Bauchi state, Alhaji Adamu Mu’azu and Isa Yuguda to end disagreements with the duo arising from conflict of interests.

    He said; “There is no way to write the history of Bauchi state without the mention of Alhaji Adamu Mu’azu and Isa Yuguda. I respect them as my seniors and if I will constitute a stumbling block to the unity of the state we are advocating, I would rather stand aside for peace to reign.

    “Instead of washing our dirty linens in public, I have agreed to bow to any of my ambitions in order to ensure that there is unity of purpose for PDP to prosper in the state”.

    In response, the chairman observed that political crisis in Bauchi state has constantly become a major problem to the PDP.

    According to him, unless other aggrieved political bigwigs in the state agreed to sheathe their swords, there would never be any headway in the party’s reconciliation efforts.

    The chairman said, “I have agreed to take part in the reconciliation process of party members either in Bauchi or the FCT so that I will have the locus standi from the North-East as the chairman of the party.”

  • LASU students to VC: reverse suspension

    LASU students to VC: reverse suspension

    The Lagos State University Students’ Union (LASUSU) has asked the university management to reverse last week suspension order slammed on 11 students of the Department of History and International Studies.

    The students said it is worried that management could go ahead with such action without giving the students a fair hearing.

    The 11 student who were executive members the History and International Studies were suspended for failing to get permission from the university management before organising an award/dinner night in which a student of the Department of International Relations and Personnel Management (IRPM) Miss Omolara Gbadeyan, reportedly drank alcohol to stupor and died shortly after.

    LASUSU outgoing president Adeyemi Wasiu Onikoro told The Nation that the institution management also goofed by prescribing on the students a punishment outside the Students Handbook.

    “Let me say here that management has breached the contract that binds them with students. We are not against punishing erring students. What we are saying is that management should not slam punishment on students for an offence which does not exist in the Students Handbook,” he said.

    The Students Handbook is like a constitution in which guides students activities on campus including offences and their corresponding punishment.

  • LASU suspends 11 over student’s death

    LASU suspends 11 over student’s death

    Authorities of the Lagos State University (LASU) have suspended 11 former executive members of the Students Society of History and International Studies (SSOHIS) indefinitely.

    The university said this in its official bulletin obtained by the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) on Wednesday in Lagos.

    It said that the students organised the ill-fated Association Award Night party of Feb. 11, where the death of a 200 level female student, Omolara Gbadeyan, ‎occurred.

    The bulletin indicated that the deceased was in the Department of Industrial Relations and Personnel Management, Faculty of Management Sciences.

    ‎According to the bulletin, the affected students are henceforth not allowed to participate in any student-related activity.

    It said they were also expected to face the student’s disciplinary committee immediately.

    ‎The University had earlier said that the organisers of the party, which claimed the life of the student, did not inform it of the event.

    It noted that the organisers sought no approval for it, which ‎was contrary to the rules and regulations of the institution.

    According to an earlier bulletin, the university authority management received the shocking news after the sad event had occurred.

    It said the management immediately swung into action by directing the health service department and the Security unit, Students Affairs Division ‎ to carry out detailed investigation on the reported incident.

    According to the bulletin, the incident was reported to the police while the body of the deceased was deposited at the morgue of the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital.

    It had said that autopsy ‎was being carried out to determine the cause of the death,” it said.

  • Ondo suspends four teachers for truancy

    The Ondo State Government Monday suspended four teachers and issued query to a school principal and ordered their salaries to be stopped for frequent absence from duty.

    The Chairman of Ondo State Teaching Service Commission (TESCOM) Prof Francis Igbasan gave the order at Ala Elefosan Community, Idanre, after a school monitoring and inspection at Idanre Local Government area.

    He said; “As at 9:35am, no teacher was seen in any of the five classes visited.

    “And going through this school’s register, Fridays seem to be declared public holidays.

    “The tone of the school is poor with everything in shamble even the school head is yet to be seen.

    “As a result of these anomalies, four teachers who are frequently caught in the web of absenteeism are hereby suspended with the school principal summoned for query and all these teachers’ salaries being stopped.”

    Igbasan noted that the four teachers had taken it as a habit to go away from their duties without any official permission.

    According to him, when teachers are in-disciplined and notorious, students will toe the same path.

    The Chairman stated that things could not continue in wrong ways if desired change was to be pursued strictly.

    He boasted that he is in charge of this commission to correct the wrongs and anomalies, saying; “you will agree with me that we need a change of attitude”

    Responding, Mr Muhammed Isah, the school’s Vice Principal, pleaded for leniency, promising to amend their ways.

    The commission also visited Idanre High School, Idanre in the local government area.

  • Senator Sani’s suspension stands – Kaduna APC

    Senator Sani’s suspension stands – Kaduna APC

    All Progressives Congress (APC) in Kaduna State on Wednesday announced that the suspension of Senator representing Kaduna Central Zone, Shehu Sani from the APC for eleven months stands.

    The Nation recalled that, the National Vice Chairman (North-West) of the party, Barrister Inuwa Abdulkadir had on Monday said the suspension of the senator was invalid. But the Kaduna State APC Executive has firmly dismissed the view.

    Addressing a press conference in Kaduna, the spokesman of the APC, Hon. Salisu Tanko Wusono said, Barrister Abdulkadir acted without the consent of the national leadership and contrary to Section 21 of APC’s constitution.

    Wusono added that the National Vice Chairman’s action was a deliberate attempt to ridicule the party for his personal interest. “The 11-month suspension slammed on Shehu Sani by the Kaduna State APC stands. Alhaji Inuwa Abdulkadir does not have the power to lift the suspension, and was acting on his own without any authorization by the national leadership of the party.

    “What happened on Monday in Kaduna between Abdulkadir and the so-called APC chieftains was an abuse of his office in promoting the narrow agenda of people who have never been interested in the progress and success of the APC.”

    Wusono also accused Abdulkadir of embarrassing the national leadership and loyal membership of the APC by his conduct.

    “Can a Senator in Inuwa Abdulkadir’s Sokoto State abuse and denigrate party leadership without being disciplined? Take this from us, the national leadership of the APC, President Buhari and his Vice- President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo and other leaders of the APC are aware of Shehu Sani’s anti-party activities and his involvement in plots to undermine the APC governments at the federal and state level.

    “Shehu Sani is only wasting his time, running from pillar to post; he is like a crocodile in a dry river. Senator Shehu Sani stands suspended from participating in all APC activities in the state. Why is he not attending President Buhari and Vice President Osibanjo’s functions in Kaduna? Why is he not participating in our activities? Why is it that the PDP senator from Southern Kaduna attends critical state functions and not him? All the 11 APC lawmakers in House of Reps from the state are loyal to our leadership. All the 28 APC lawmakers in the Kaduna State House of Assembly are standing by the party and its government. Shehu Sani has chosen to be on his own, and the APC cannot abide his acute irresponsibility and his lack of any appreciation of disciplined political conduct and party discipline.

    “There is difference between grandstanding and genuine representation. Kaduna Central, which elected him to the Senate, is one of the most populous senatorial districts in the country with a lot of complexity and dynamism. Rather than representing them well, he is consumed by his penchant for popularity shows, and irresponsible comments like someone who has reduced his duty into a perpetual ego trip.”

    The spokesman added that Shehu Sani and his group are trying to use the back door to get back to the party having realized the failure of their attempts to destroy the party in the state.

  • Senate seeks suspension of rice importation through land borders

    The Senate yesterday asked the Federal Government to suspend the lifting of the ban on importation of rice through the land borders.

    The Nigerian Customs Service (NCS) lifted the ban about two months ago to check rice smuggling.

    The senate’s action followed the adoption of the report of its ad-hoc committee on import duty waivers, concessions and grants.

    The committee said lifting the ban would lead to evasion of customs duty and maritime revenue losses.

    It also said lifting the ban would lead to increased diversion of vessels to neighbouring countries.

    The lower five per cent import levy on rice by some neighbouring countries the panel noted, is enough inducement, warning:  “If not checked, (it)  will on the long run lead to massive vessels desertion of Nigerian ports and the concomitant unemployment of Nigerians.”

    In lifting the ban, NCS said it would bring more revenue to public coffers, reduce  smuggling and the commodity’s price by breaking the monopoly of rice millers who have the capacity to import large consignment.

    On October 15 the senate debated a motion on the dangers posed by the removal of rice from the import restriction list and the re-introduction of import duty payment at land borders. It asked its ad-committee to invite customs Comptroller-General, Col Hameed Ali (rtd) to brief it on the reasons behind the new policy.

    The ad-committee headed by Senator Adamu Aliero noted that between 2010 and 2012, there were inconsistencies in rice imports fiscal policies.

    The policies, the committee noted, ‘led to frequent changes in levy payable on rice’ with conflicting opinions of the classification of Husked brown rice.

    It noted that because of this policies somersault the Customs, recommended the restriction of rice imports to the sea ports to monitor the commodity’s importation.

    The committee said because of this somersault, some importers exceeded their quota allocation, resulting in an outstanding duty of over N24 billion and subsequent suspension of the 2015 rice import quotas.

    It observed that the introduction of the 2014-2017 National Rice Policy has brought about stability in the tariff regime.

    The committee said though the NCS claimed to  be well equipped to monitor the land borders “the Customs Service failed to convince the committee of its ability to actually monitor the porous borders.

    “Therefore, the committee doubts their assumed capacity given previous record of collusion with smugglers. If the efficiency is there, prohibited frozen chicken and other contraband would not have flooded our markets,” the committee said.

    The committee said it discovered that any importer “that imports between five and 10 shiploads/vessel of rice into Benin Republic and destined them to Nigeria through the land borders already had predetermined motive to cheat Nigeria government of revenue through duty evasion.”

    According to the committee, there is no justification for importation of parboiled rice meant for Nigeria to be discharged at Cotonou and five per cent import duty paid on it.

    The commodity, it noted, is loaded into trucks and the importer pays N400,000 per truck at the Nigerian border and on arrival  pay another import duty of either 30 per cent or 70 per cent. “The committee does not see any logic in this.”

    Senate President Bukola Saraki described the matter as serious because it affects revenue generation and improvement of agriculture.

    He added that no genuine importer would prefer to import through the land border if there is no ulterior motive.

    Saraki said lifting the ban on land border importation of rice is definitely not in the interest of the economy of the country.

  • Suspension of Saraki’s trial at CCT violates new ACJL 2015, says Falana

    Suspension of Saraki’s trial at CCT violates new ACJL 2015, says Falana

    Lagos lawyer Femi Falana(SAN) has described as illegal the decision of the Supreme Court of Nigeria which stopped the alleged criminal proceedings against Senate President, Bukola Saraki at the Code of Conduct Tribunal.

    Falana, in a statement titled: “Illegality of stay of proceedings in FRN v Saraki” said the order of stay of proceedings granted by  the apex court ignored the provisions of sections 306 and 396 of the new Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 signed into law on May 13, 2015, by former President Goodluck Jonathan. “With  the enactment of the AJCA, the supension of criminal cases  by all accused persons has been effectively stopped in Nigeria.  Therefore, any judge who orders a stay f proceedings in any criminal trial does so illegally and is liable to be sanctioned by the National Judicial Council. It is unfathomable that the Supreme Court  decided to return the country to the status quo ante in a rather  brazen and bizzaire manner. In view of the ouster clause contained  in section 306 of the AJCA, the Code of Conduct Tribunal ought not to have delivered its ruling in respect of the preliminary objections filed by Dr. Saraki.

    “It was not a case of oversight or lack of knowledge of the existence of the AJCA on the part of the Court but a deliberate judicial decision to turn back the hand of the clock in the ongoing battle against corruption and impunity in the land”, he noted adding, “the ruling should have been read together with the judgment after the conclusion of the trial. It was the premature ruling of the Tribunal which led to the filing of an interlocutory appeal in the matter.

    According to him, “ one had expected the learned Justices of the Supreme Court to correct the litany of legal errors committed at the lower courts. But the errors were endorsed as the apex court decided to halt the trial without any legal justification whatsoever.

    “The counsel to the federal government, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs SAN was even boxed to a corner by the Court to the extent that he had to undertake not to proceed with the trial at the Code of Conduct Trubunal pending the determination of the interlocutory appeal!

    “As a creation of the law the Supreme Court is bound by the law. So are the Justices of the Court”, he stated.

    Citing the case of one Joseph Amashoma v The State (2011) 14 NWLR (pt 1268) 530, the honourable Justice John Fabiyi  held that “The appellant’s counsel should be reminded of the doctrine of Separation of Powers as enshrined in the 1999 Constitution. The Legislature is to enact law while it is the duty of the Judiciary to interpret the law as enacted….There is no escape route.”

    He lamented that the Supreme Court discountenanced the tenet of separation of powers by the deliberate refusal to limit itself to the interpretation of the relevant provisions of the AJCA.

    “With profound respect to the reverred members of the panel of the Court the order of stay of proceedings granted by them last week flies in the face  of  section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015 which provides that “An application for stay of proceedings in respect of a criminal matter before the court shall not be entertained.” Indeed, ex abundanti cautela, section 396 thereof further provides that all preliminary objections “shall be considered along with the substantive issues and a ruling shall thereon be made at the time of the delivery of judgment.” Apart from abolishing stay of proceedings the AJCA has effectively banned interlocutory appeals in criminal trials.

    “Therefore, the controversial ruling of the Supreme Court should not be allowed to stand because of its far-reaching implications and negative impact on the administration of criminal justice in the country. Since the ruling is  binding on all other courts  in line with the hallowed principle  of stare decisis the Supreme Court should take advantage of the substantive appeal in the Saraki’s case to review  its position with a view to confirming the abolition  of stay of proceedings by section 306 of the AJCA”, he argued.

     

     

     

  • Blatter appeals against suspension

    Blatter appeals against suspension

    Joseph Blatter has appealed against his suspension by the Ethics Committee of world football body FIFA, his American lawyer Richard Cullen said on Friday.

    Cullen told newsmen that Blatter’s appeal was filed Thursday to the FIFA appeal committee.

    The news came after Blatter’s adviser Klaus Stoehlker had said an appeal against the provisional suspension would make no sense.

    The ethics committee on Thursday banned Blatter, as well as Michel Platini, the UEFA president and FIFA vice-president, for 90 days.

    The ban was in in connection with a criminal investigation by Swiss authorities.

    Blatter is suspected of mismanagement and Platini is named as the recipient of a “disloyal payment” from FIFA.

    Platini said on Thursday that he would appeal the ruling and, like Blatter, he has protested his innocence.

    Blatter and Platini are banned from all football activities for 90 days or until the appeal committee nullifies the ban.

    However, there is still the possibility of the ethics committee extending the ban for another 45 days.

    Platini is a candidate for the FIFA presidency at an extraordinary congress billed for Feb. 26, but he must however first go through an integrity check.

    Another potential candidate, Chung Mong-joon of South Korea, was banned for six years Thursday over other issues.

    As a result of this, and according to FIFA statutes, senior vice-president Issa Hayatou of Cameroon is now the acting FIFA president.

  • Protests trail ‘suspension’ of four education varsities

    Protests trail ‘suspension’ of four education varsities

    In the twilight of former President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration, four colleges of education were upgraded to university of education. But, rumour has it that President Muhammadu Buhari has allegedly ordered the suspension of the new status of the institutions; a development that is generating tension between workers and their managements. Our reporters LEKE AKEREDOLU (Akure) KOLADE ADEYEMI (Kano) OKODILI NDIDI (Owerri) and ABDULGAFAR ALABELEWEW (Kaduna) report. 

    •Workers accuse provosts, elements in government of sabotage
    •Four provosts cannot be greater than the people, says managment
    •Govt urged to conduct national debate before verdict

    Last May, the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan took some last-minute decisions, among which was the upgrading of four colleges of education to university status.

    The institutions are: Adeyemi College of Education, Ondo (now Adeyemi University of Education, Ondo); Federal College of Education, Zaria (now Federal University of Education, Zaria); Federal College of Education, Kano (now Federal University of Education, Kano); and Alvan Ikoku College of Education, Owerri (now Alvan Ikoku University of Education, Owerri).

    However, reports in some social mediums had it that the Federal Government, last week suspended the new status of the institutions, fuelling fresh protests and stiff resistance by workers. Many of them are pointing accusing fingers at provosts of the institutions, saying they connived with certain elements in the government to bring about the reversal.

     

    Genesis

    The new government of President Muhammadu Buhari had hardly settled down for business when reactions from various quarters on whether to retain the new status of the institutions or revert them to their old status began to pour in.  Those opposed to their new status felt the upgrade was politically motivated, and that the four institutions were better off as colleges of education.  Some also wondered why the sudden move in less than two months to Jonathan’s exit from office. Others, particularly workers, who were favourably disposed to the university idea, held the view that aside being the oldest colleges of education nationwide, the institutions have the infrastructure and faculty staff to transform to universities.

    In addition, some of them, prior to their upgrade, were running degree programmes and Post-Graduate Diplomas (PGD) in affiliation with some universities. To the host communities of the institutions, who had long craved for the new status, it was a welcome development and they were a lot happier.

     

    Protest rocks Adeyemi University of Education, Ondo

     

    But there were mixed feelings about the new status. While some members of staff were happy with the host communities, others were not. And those not favourably disposed to the new status allegedly worked against it.

    Although their identities are not known and some workers have refused to disclose those allegedly behind the move, investigations revealed that some lecturers, who had spent many years in the system, worked with some prominent people in the society to reverse the schools’ status.

    It was further learnt that the alleged sponsors have refused to improve themselves, especially in attaining their Ph.D degrees, and were afraid the new status of their institutions might either choke them, or make them inferior.

    The Nation reporters gathered that the ‘anti-university’ promoters secretly formed a group in the four affected colleges of education, using the platform to push their demands.

    The group was alleged to have been in touch with some highly connected people in government to get their message to the Presidency.

    Their agitation was anchored on the fact that majority of the teachers in the four institutions have no Ph.D degrees, raising the fear that they might be sent back to the labour market that is replete with unemployed.

    However, their argument was at variance with that of the  non-teaching staff of the institutions.

    The non-teaching staff, through their unions – Non-Academic Staff Union (NASU), Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities (SSANU), and National Association of Academic Technologists (NAAT), also formed a joint union called ‘Joint Non-Teaching Staff Action Committee’ (JNTSAC) to work against the planned reversal.

    The President of the Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities (SSANU), Comrade Femi Lademikan, was made their chairman at an emergency congress at an occassion  which held at the institution’s premises in Ondo State.

    Some of the aggrieved workers, who stormed the congress venue, were armed with canes, ostensibly to go straight to the offices of those pushing for the reversal to flog them. Nonetheless, they were prevailed upon by leaders of the unions, who admonished them not to be violent in pressing for their demands.

    Addressing the workers at the congress, Lademikan said union leaders had not gone to bed, adding that they had been seeking assistance, particularly from prominent indigenes of the Ondo kingdom.

    “Immediately we heard about this (reversal to old status), we rushed to Osemawe of Ondo, Oba Victor Kiladejo, but, unfortunately, the monarch was not in the country. That took us to his second in command; the Lisa of Ondo, Chief, Simeon Oguntimehin.

    “He expressed sadness on the issue and immediately called the Vice President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, his wife, Dolapo and President Muhammadu Buhari’s media aide, Mr. Femi Adesina on the issue.They all said the news was strange to them and that there was no such plan in the Presidency.

    “We told him of our plan to stage a protest to the Osemawe’s palace and also the Governor’s Office, but Chief Oguntimehin appealed against the idea, fearing that some unscrupulous elements might hijack the process,” he said.

    But the aggrieved workers insisted that, despite Oguntimehin’s appeal, they must march to the gate of their institution on Ondo-Ore-Lagos Expressway.

    They displayed placards with various inscriptions, such as “Mr President take away corruption, not our university”; “University status, no going back”; “Forward ever, backward never”.

    Their action caused a gridlock on the route for about an hour.

    Addressing reporters, Lademikan said: “We want our university to remain, and we are appealing to the government through this peaceful demonstration.

    “We are telling President Muhammadu Buhari that we have everything- manpower, people, structures and resources that it will take to maintain the new status of this institution. We are peaceful and cooperative. Mr. President must not listen to people, who don’t love him, sycophants and those enemies of progress.

    “There are so many publications in the media that the institution should be returned to college, but because of this forum, we won’t mention names. We know them and we are waiting for them.”

    Teachers in the institution, under the umbrella of Lecturers’ Union of Adeyemi University, had quickly aligned with JNTSAC, describing the upgrade to university as a step in the right direction.

    A statement signed by its Public Relations Officer (PRO), Mr. Olaolu Olaniyan, said: “The union notes with utter dismay and outright displeasure, the rumour making the rounds about the purported reversal of the hard-earned university status of Adeyemi Federal University of Education and three other newly upgraded universities of education.

    “We want to emphatically express our rejection of such a reversal which is only capable of creating avoidable tension in the new university community and the host community by extension.

    “The upgrading of the institution into a full fledged university was premised on several factors, chiefly, the high quality of academic staff, who have worked assiduously over the years to produce an array of trained teachers for the primary and secondary school components. The institution also runs Post-Graduate Diploma in Education programme.

    ” It is, therefore, in the light of the foregoing that the union rejects in absolute terms any attempt whatsoever to truncate the upgrading of the institution to a full fledged university status. It is an ill wind that blows nobody no good, and capable of precipitating crisis in the immediate university community and the host community.”

    Also, the President, Students’ Union Government of Adeyemi Federal University of Education. Isiaka Kamarudeen, lent his voice.

    “We have celebrated this and that is how it should be. Nobody should reverse our status. It will look so bad on the side of workers and students of the institution if such negative decision is taken. Government must not take any decision that can cause students’ unrest,” Kamarudeen said.

    But a member of the management, who preferred anonymity, expressed shock over the development.

    He said “I was surprised that some of our lecturers were fingered in this plot and I don’t know why people will be against good thing? I still remember the efforts of the former ACE Provost, Prof. Idowu Adeyemi, the Osemawe of Ondo and other prominent people in the state in this drive.  How come some few people will now be planning to scuttle what a large number of people had laboured for?

    “The former Provost gave room for lecturers to develop themselves and through that many of them got their Ph.D, and I don’t know why some people will now complain that we have fewer Ph.D holders?

     

    It’s one week warning strike at the Federal University of Education, Kano

     

    Members of the Academic Staff of the Federal College of Education, Kano, on Monday, shut down the institution paralysing academic activities. The development followed their one week warning strike made known to members last week.

    The workers’ aim was to ask the government to clarify issues on the alleged controversial  reversal, based on the circular forwarded to the institution.

    The aggrieved workers alleged that the Provost, Dr Rabi Jubirila,  doctored the memo signed by the Acting Permanent Secretary, Federal Ministry of Education, Hajia Hindatu Umar Abdullahai, for her selfish interest.

    The Chairman of the Academic Staff Union of the institution, Dr Abubakar Sadeeq Haruna, accused Jubirila of saying that the said memo directed the institution to revert to the status quo, which, according to him, was contrary to the contents of the memo.

    Haruna said government only directed that the institution put everything on hold pending further instructions, and not to immediately revert to the former status.

    But, speaking to The Nation, Dr Jubirila confirmed the purported letter.

    “The memo received from the Federal Government specifically cited two major issues, saying that by the copy of this memo, you are directed to revert the school to its original status,” she said, quoting a part of the memo.

    She continued: “In addition, you are directed to continue to administer the college as Federal College of Education and as the Provost of the college with all right and privilege.”

    Nonetheless, Jubrilla denied allegations that provosts of the four affected colleges were the architect of the reversal.  “Four provosts cannot be too powerful to influence the Federal Government’s decision,” she protested.

    However, Haruna described the reversal as ‘too hasty’, and failed to comply with due process.

    He lamented that, despite an earlier memo sent to the government, highlighting the advantages of the upgrade to university, and the negative consequences its reversal may generate, the latter still stuck to its guns.

    The union urged the government to toe the line of due process, and subject the planned reversal to a national debate before jumping to conclusion.

     

    Another strike at Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education

     

    On Tuesday, joint academic bodies of Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education, comprising the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), Senior Staff Association of Nigeria Universities (SSANU), the Students’ Union Government (SUG) and National Association of Technologists (NAT) began a one-week warning strike against the plot.

    The aggrieved protesters displayed placards with various inscriptions such as: “Welcome to Alvan Ikoku University of Education, Owerri; farewell to Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education, Owerri’; ‘We want a Vice Chancellor. We reject a Provost’; ‘Forward ever, backward never! We can never go back to Egypt,’, among others.

    The ASUU Chairman, Comrade Okachi Wachukwu, who led the protest, said Dr Ijeoma intimated her of the reversal on Friday last week.

    Wachukwu said: “Even if we have been told that it was going to be reversed, the status quo should have been maintained while deliberations are on.”

    The workers alleged that Dr Ijeoma, whom they said lost out in a bid to clinch the position of the Vice Chancellor, in conjunction with some lecturers, who were relieved of their duties because they lacked the requisite qualifications, were behind the move. However, Dr Ijeoma declined comments.

    “I don’t want to say anything on this issue,” she politely told our reporter.

     

    Fed Govt ill-advised, insist workers at the Federal University of Education, Kaduna

     

    In Zaria, the combined unions, which have already metamorphosed into Joint Unions of Federal University of Education (FUE) Zaria, said  President Buhari was ill-advised.

    The unions, comprising the Academic Staff Union of Universities of Education (ASUUE), Non Academic Staff Union (NASU) and SSANU, argued that the new role of the institution could not be underestimated.

    Speaking on behalf of the three unions in Zaria, ASUUE Chairman, Zaria, Malam Yahuza Salmanu, said: “Mr President, our attention has been drawn to a purported move by the Federal Government to revert the four federal universities of education recently upgraded to university status.

    “ASUUE- FUE, Zaria considers the move as retrogressive, ill-advised, counterproductive and totally out of tune with international best practices in teacher education programme.”

    Salmanu said ASUUE feared the move would further draw teacher education backward.

    “At present, degree holders are being clamoured for to teach right from nursery school. Why then should the government be thinking of reverting universities to institutions that would produce only NCE teachers?

    “The four universities of education are not new per se; they have structures, personnel, and have been teaching undergraduates and this should not be derailed,” he pleaded.

    Meanwhile our correspondent, who visited the institution last week, observed that a circular containing the Federal Government’s directive to put the conversion on hold littered the institution.

    When contacted, Head of Public Relations Unit of the institution, Hajia Rakiya Sidi, said the management did not have any choice other than to comply with Federal Government’s directive.

     

  • Don’s suspension sparks tension

    Don’s suspension sparks tension

    THE crisis rocking the Ignatius Ajuru University of Education (IAUE) Rumuolumini, Port Harcourt, over the suspension of Professor Dele Osahogulu, a director in the Information Technology unit of the ivory tower,  has taken a new dimension. Rumours are making the rounds in the university that the Vice Chancellor, Prof. Rosemund Dienye Green-Osahogulu, may be fired by the Rivers state government.

    Prof Green-Osahogulu
    Prof Green-Osahogulu

    The speculations are coming on the heels of the calls by the Academic Staff Union of University (ASUU) IAUE chapter, for the head of Prof Green-Osahogulu over the suspension of their member, who is the vice chancellor’s estranged husband.

    The Nation also learnt that a letter was sent by ASUU to the Rivers State Governor, Nyesom Wike, seeking his intervention in the crisis.

    But, Mrs Green-Osahogulu has debunked the rumour of being asked to resign. In a text message to our reporter, she said:  “Please ask those who said a resignation letter has been given to me to show the letter.”

    On Tuesday, August 4, following the crisis, ASUU members were chased out of the venue of their meeting by security personnel on the order of the vice-chancellor. The meeting, which was later held at the open field of the university, was to call on Mrs Green-Osahogulu to resign  over what the union described as a “ridicule on the image of the university”.

    “We have resolved that in view of the spate of ugly, scandalous and disturbing events unfolding in the university involving the vice chancellor, the union wishes to write to the vice chancellor to honourably resign her position as the vice chancellor of Ignatius Ajuru  University of Education Port Harcourt due to the following reasons: faked kidnapped saga, extortion of students, inflated price of the purchase of liaison office in Abuja, and abuse of due process in disciplinary issues,” ASUU stated in a letter after the meeting.

    According to sources, the crisis began as a poorly-managed matrimonial issue between Prof Dele Osahogulu and his wife, Prof Green-Osahogulu, making the duo to wash their dirty linen in public.

    Mrs Green-Osahogulu was reportedly kidnapped by unknown gunmen and was later released to the family after eight days in the kidnappers’ den. Shortly afterwards, there was a scandal over whether she was kidnapped. The development caused a division among workers in the university. Although Prof Green-Osahogulu claimed she was kidnapped in June 18 and released on 27 of same month, news of her kidnap was not made public until last month.

    However, what was supposed to be an internal affair between Prof Green-Osahogulu and her husband, Dele Osahogulu became a universiy affair when Osahogulu (Dele) was suspended for three months without pay.

    Osahogulu, a don and head of the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) unit, was accused of granting an interview to a state-based local tabloid, alleging that his wife’s kidnap was stage-managed.

    Osahogulu has since denied the report.

    Similarly, the Rivers State Police Command, which earlier confirmed the kidnapping, suddenly made a U-turn. The command’s Police Public Relation Officer (PPRO), Ahmad Mohammad, a Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), told The Nation the case “is  under investigation.”

    “The case of the alleged kidnapping of the VC of IAUE is still being investigated as such. Due to recent revelations, it is only a logical conclusion of the investigation that will determine it to be such or otherwise,” Mohammad said.

    But Osahogulu’s suspension has deepened the face-off between ASUU and some workers loyal to the vice chancellor. ASUU-IAUE Chairman Dr Ugochuchu Agi, described the suspension as an abuse of power by the management. Agi said Osahogulu remains innocent until a court of law rules otherwise.

    Dr. Agi
    Dr. Agi

    Agi was later invited by the management and, subsequently, quizzed by security personnel for speaking to the press on the matter.

    “Look, we are not in support of the suspension as a union,” Agi told our reporter. “The suspension of our member is an irresponsible application of power. You don’t suspend somebody and take away his salaries for three months because of mere allegation.”

    Agi continued: “I was expecting the university authority to have set up a panel to investigate the allegations before taking such a hasty decision. We did not want to be thrown into controversy; we know that our member has fallen victim of kidnapping saga and it is regrettable that all these things are happening without due process.

    “There is a rumour that the union suspended him (Dele Osahogulu). It is the university authority and not ASUU. We, as a union, are against such suspension because there must a process before a decision could be taken.”

    Agi’s reaction irked the management which decided to respond via another briefing.

    At the event, which took place at the Saint John campus of the university, Mrs Green-Osahogulu, said her estranged husband had admitted before the school management some of the allegations levelled against him.

    She said: “Prof Dele Osahogulu was given a query and he denied the said statement published on the local newspaper. He even disowned the newspaper and said that he didn’t make statements even on telephone to any reporter.

    “Sequel to the reply, the university management invited Prof Osahogulu to a meeting. While fielding questions from members of the management, he substantially admitted the contents of the said publication but attributed it to his state of mind at the time.

    “The university management found the conduct of Prof Osahogulu scandalous, disgraceful and prejudicial to the integrity of the Office of the Vice Chancellor and the reputation of the university. The university authority, therefore, placed him on three-month suspension in the first instance while investigation into other issues raised in the publication is ongoing.”

    Initially, Osahogulu denied granting an interview. He also told our reporter of his denial of the interview credited to him in a local medium.

    He said allegations against him by his wife were to tarnish his image, urging the reporter to ascertain the true position of things.

    An SMS Osahogulu sent to our reporter reads thus: “My silence on this matter is not admittance; it is in compliance with the IAUE rules and regulations that forbid the granting of press interview by staff.

    “The press is the watchdog of the society. If you are convinced that the vice chancellor is deliberately precluding public awareness on my own account, the media should then defend the oppressed and poor folk like me.”

    On visiting the university, the reporter observed that the scandal has polarised workers, particularly at the management level. Investigation also showed that certain elements appeared to be fuelling the scandal with the aim of taking over the vice chancellor’s job.

    Some workers opposed to the vice chancellor, who spoke to our reporter on condition of anonymity, insisted that her kidnap saga was still unconfirmed. They said the vice chancellor had been calling for the heads of those speaking the truth.

    “The vice chancellor is over zealous. You need to see her talking to men during management meetings. She is not popular in this university.The question should be: ‘How many students and lecturers sympathised with her purported kidnap?  A woman who cannot respect the husband that married her, who do you think she will respect?” the source said.

    Another worker added:”Whether the vice chancellor’s  kidnap was stage-managed or not, she shouldn’t have petitioned her husband. As the head of the university, it was wrong of her to support the suspension of Dele without setting up a panel to investigate the allegations. She is victimising workers unnecessarily. I suspect her next target will be the ASUU chairman.”

    Those sympathetic to Prof Green-Osahogulu, but did not wish to be mentioned, justified the suspension.

    One of them said calling Mrs Green-Osahogulu names, despite her achievement  in the university, was to intimidate her because she is a woman.

    “You are a journalist, go and investigate her (vice chancellor’s) achievement in the school; some people are scheming to take over her job using the scandal. She was not the one that suspended Prof Dele, it was the authority. The management invited Dele and after questioning him took the decision because of his nonchalant behaviour; so why call the vice chancellor name?”

    Students who also reacted to the issue pleaded anonymity.

    A source in the IAUE Students’ Union said: “Our position is that it is regrettable that this university is now being mocked because of one allegation or the other. We are really disappointed with the authority over this. You can imagine the kind of shameful act displayed the last time ASUU was having their meeting, and the vice chancellor ordered that they be sent out of the hall. It is that bad.”

    Efforts to get the Directorate of State Security Service (DSS) and Police to speak further on the matter were futile. But a source from the DSS, who did not want to be named, said workers who were involved in the incident had been invited and grilled.