Tag: sustainable

  • ‘Fed Govt must come out with  sustainable energy blueprint’

    ‘Fed Govt must come out with sustainable energy blueprint’

    Power to run the engine of the national economy has been in deficit over the years due to neglect of the sector by successive administrations. Mr Hyacinth Udemba, an engineer and chief executive officer, Prostar Global Energy, a firm that specialises in renewable energy, says the Federal Government must come out with a blueprint that will spell out yearly addition of megawatts to the national grid. In this interview with LUCAS AJANAKU, he speaks on the constraints facing telecoms companies, the need for governments and banks to fund alternative power provision and other sundry issues. Excerpts:

     

    How would you assess the performance of the economy, especially when the Federal Government says the economy is growing and such growth is not creating jobs?

    Job creation may not be the only index for scoring a performing economy. I can rate the performance with reference to where the economy was before leadership changed hands from Umaru Musa Ya Adua to Goodluck Jonathan.

    At the moment, we seem to look at our currency exchange rate in relation to other major currencies. So far, it has been fairly stable. The exchange rate might be comparatively high, but that is a function of the level of our exports and narrow band economic activities in terms of variety of local manufacturing and export commodities. It may remain high as long as we have a mono export commodity which is oil. Job creation becomes a possibility when the enabling frameworks are put in place. The main factor to achieving the feat remains the availability of electricity. Aside this, we can actually give ourselves a pass mark if we look around and see the level of infrastructural changes. I guess our thinking of poor performance is in relation of manpower and resources available to us compared with some other nations. In a way, Nigeria is really a peculiar nation and more complex than we sometimes assume. I believe we are making progress.

    How can the economy be made to work?

    Believing in one nation is the key. The economy can be made to work as expected if we all do what we are supposed to do and the government is sincere with programmes and policies. We all should learn to sound less about political party or tribal affiliations. All manners of corruption are tied to the fact that we do not love the country, hence, tribal or party affairs take precedent in our hearts.

    At what level of megawatts of electricity would Nigeria be at peace?

    I will base my answer on the fact that we are clamouring for industrialisation as the needed antidote for quick growth. If this must come through, then we must make provision for its sustainability through availability of electricity. I will like to look at a situation where companies are hooking on to the national grid as power is gradually being made available. To this extent, considering the size of the country, Nigeria would need about 50,000Mw in the next 25 years. Of the 50,000Mw, 10,000Mw will be a reserve while 40,000Mw remains the daily output to the grid.

    In seeking alternative electricity supply to the national grid, at what point should government come in?

    The government has no reason not to advance technologically in the power sector like other developing countries which include Kenya, South Aftrica, India, Malaysia and Indonasia. The story is different these days as the cost of renewable energy materials and accessories are nose diving. Nigeria can actually pick up with other countries when the right policy is in place with incentives. What stops Nigeria from producing solar panels or wind turbine parts? One of the government agencies, the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure or NASENI, under the Ministry of Science and Technology, tried to lead the way in producing solar panels locally. What is the fate of the age ncy today? If the policy for the use of solar energy in Nigeria is promises incentives, foreigners will troop in to manufacture, solving the problem in the sector and creating jobs. The enabling environment for foreign manufacturers may include but not limited to loan facilities (access to credit), land acquisition, provision of security, and for the users of solar power, a grant of carbon credit.

    How is this going to happen?

    One of the ways to get the country running for the renewable energy sector is to put a policy in place. For instance, the government sets aside $900 million as laon for people going into battery and inverter production, solar panel assembly and also make a policy that every new estate built must incorporate renewable energy, or that every bank, estate must use solar energy for their perimeter lighting. Such a policy will spur people to purchase these materials massively. Those who want to come into the industry will have confidence that there is a policy in place. Before an installation of a 10Mw production capacity of solar panels, the manufacturers must have extrapolated the sale of at least 1Mw of solar panels per annum. This will assure the manufacturers that installation of a 10 MW photovoltaic plant will lead to recouping investment in about five years time. Without such policy, it will be difficult to get investors to the sector. No sane entrepreneur will go to the bank and obtain loan without assurance that there is a policy in place that will guarantee the market for the product. For instance, anybody can now come and invest in the oil and gas sector because the market is there. If an investor wishes to refine petroleum in the country, he can refine and sell. If he’s able to refine at competitive price, he will sell because the market is there for him.

    How?

    When Germany began her own 100,000 roofs on solar programme in 2004, banks were involved because people had to take loans secured by the government and insured by insurance companies. During summer, they sell the power to the government, during winter, they buy from the government, thus, they gradually offset their loan and at a constant interest rate which was cheap enough to attract investors. The government also put incentives in place to compensate them for saving the environment from global warming, hence, the carbon credit. So, there must be some incentives to attract investors. Until the right things are done, at the right time, we may not really get anywhere.

    You are calling for an all-encompassing power sector policy?

    Yes, a policy not only on the conventional means of generating power but that which will encapsulate renewable energy and spur people to invest in the sector. That is the way it is in Germany, Japan and even South Africa. These countries have policies in place that allow people to invest. The advantage of this is that you will be creating employment opportunities. One of the ways President Obama of the US is creating job is through the support he is giving to alternative energy, wind energy precisely. By the time you set up about four to five factories in the US, that will employ tens of thousands of people. The same thing can happen here. Let us begin with the battery and inverter production. Solar panel may not be a big employer of labour but it is part of it.

    Imagine the volume and value of contract jobs that are given out each year. Before the end of the year, the government would have given out about N20 billion worth of contracts on renewable energy. I am aware of the amount the Ministry of Environment, Health, Transport, Energy Commission, some state governments and the rest of them may be spending in the sector without really being serious about the correct function of the installed systems. Can’t we make a policy that this N20 billion that we are going to spend, part of it be directed to local production of some of the components? Why do we have to continue to import and install? The government should make a policy that will be private-sector-driven in power generation through both conventional and renewable sources.

    It might take several years to get the stable power the government is promising. Anything shorter than 30 to 40 years power plan will bring about power plants that will stop functioning after the exit of President Jonathan.

    Thirty and forty years plan?

    Yes, Nigeria at the moment is talking about six-10MW power generation if all the plans go well. How do we compare Nigeria with South Africa that currently generates about 47Mw? We may claim to be having fairly constant power supply now and not yet stable power supply. It is only when you have stable power supply that companies like the Nigerian Breweries and the likes will once more hook on to the national grid. Until then, what we have today may best be for domestic use. By the time the redundant loads gets in, we might be back to where were. Nigerians should not be fooled by the slogan of government that they will get stable power supply between now and next two years. It is not possible. It is just not possible.

    Nigerians should not expect stable power supply?

    Yes, we cannot afford it now. I may be seen as being pessimistic in this regard, it is the truth. Remember what happened under the late Bola Ige when he was appointed power minister. He openly told Nigerians that there will be stable power in Nigeria within six months. It’s the same advisers in the ministry that gave him the wrong signal. The late President Umaru Yar’ Adua came to power with his seven-point agenda, he made same promise of power stability. Once again, those who think that they are helping Jonathan achieve his transformation agenda are beginning to hurry the winners of power generation stations to get going in haste. Setting up and running a power generation station efficiently is not a tea party.

    You said Nigeria cannot afford stable power. What do you mean?

    We cannot afford it because there is no policy in place to drive that. The operators in the power sector keep telling Nigerians about 6000Mw generation. This is barely enough for domestic energy needs. They are not talking about suppressed demand, those that were switched off because they know the power is not there. When you bring the firms that should be running on the national grid together, you will discover that 6000MW is a dip compared to the demand that will surge. Nigeria does not generate what the New York Fire Department in the USA need for its operation. Imagine the sheer size and industrial level of the country compared with South Africa which has 47000 MW.

    Each time they mention 6000MW as the target, I feel ashamed because with those ridiculous megawatts, we are simply going nowhere. So, we just have to think of how many megawatts to add to the national grid yearly. Let the government have a policy that yearly about 1000MW will be added to the national grid. This should be followed to a logical conclusion.

    President Jonathan can do it. Add just 1,000Mw to the grid, you will see an improvement. Before the end of his tenure he would have achieved enough. Given that many power stations are under construction at the moment, it is an indication that such may be achieved, at least, to 70 per cent. India is doing just that. India is adding a minimum of 3,500MW yearly. Even if you have enough, you keep the excess as reserve in case there is failure. Despite the volume of power generation in India, the country still experienced failures that nearly crippled its economy a few months ago. This is one of the reasons the government should aim higher and become more focused and target-oriented in this sector.

    So, before this country can have stable power supply, it will be between the next 30 to 40 years. We can only prove that wrong if we begin to do something positive from today.

    And what do we do?

    Aside the policy that will add about 1000MW or whatever we think is within reach into the system, government must ensure that every measure that will make it run steadily is in place. We must also ensure that existing ones run at, at least, 75 per cent of installed capacities. If we are able to do so, then would have charted the path to end the nightmare. We must also make sure that 0.5 per cent of our energy needs is put off the national grid and switched into renewable energy every year. If we now quantify the power needs of the domestic sector, we will know the deficit. In India, today, many British and other foreign companies are setting up business because the country has steady policies. Its textile industry is working fine. Almost all the textile mills in the UK have their base in India.

    If telecoms operators run Base Transmission Stattions (BTS) on solar, would there be any respite to their challenges?

    To provide renewable energy to the cell sites, because of the capacity of the BTS, the solar panels required will occupy about 90 square metres which is not tenable given the problem of securing land. Anywhere they install BTS, they don’t have enough land and they pay heavily for the small plot.To be able to accommodate about 12,000 watts of power required by each BTS, solar panel of not less than 10,000 watts is required and it will occupy a surface area of not less than 50-60 square metres. You have to supply security for the solar panel too because they will be stolen. If Nigerians steal bridge rails, the rods, irons, pipes used to protect us from falling into the lagoon on Eko Bridge, and also steal our own street lights, how are you sure that the solar panels will not be stolen? So, another thing is the security implication. That is why they find it difficult to deploy renewable energy to power their BTS. The late General Abacha commissioned the use of solar cells to power the railway communication link systems, but within six months of installation, they were all vandalsied. Abacha was resuscitating rail transportation then and you cannot use the rail without communication links as they move from one station to the other. Now, to make sure that communication is enhanced, solar was used but they were vandalised.

    With the migration to cash-less economy which means that ATMs and other electronic channels of payment would require energy constantly, why are banks not exploring the solar power option?

    Every bank needs a large quantity of energy to run its operation and solar system may not be an option now because of the cost implication compared with the power demand. But ATMs can depend on solar or inverter backup depending on location or the branch of the bank. Deploying solar for full bank operations will require a large space for the panels. But what we are saying is that if banks have policies in place to support renewable energy as we have in other countries, it will be okay. But banks are not looking in that direction perhaps, they are not aware of the roles they can play in the sector.

     

    Operators are therefore left to do the little they can. So, at the moment, we are not encouraged in the sense that the incentives from government through the banks is not there. And also, any time the government wants to give major jobs out, they don’t give them to indigenous experts. It is either they are given to foreign installers, or companies or they are done the same way they do other projects in the country. I want to believe that all that is now changing by virtue of the new Procurement Act, I think they are beginning to give jobs to those who have the competence to do the jobs. But as government is beginning to pick interest in the sector, if things are done properly, I want to believe that in the next five years, we shall be somewhere in the area of energy in the country. It is only then that the rolls of the banking industry in the sector may be established.

     

    But Lagos State is using solar to light the streets and they are not subjected to vandalism. Why?

    In the area of using solar power to improve street lights, Lagos State is a just an isolated case because I also know that Peter Odili, former governor of Rivers State did the same in Port Harcourt and within few weeks, many of them installed along the airport road were vandalised. They are only safe if they are installed within the city. Like the one we have in Morrocco Road, Aggrey Road, First Avenue, they are not vandalised but the ones along airport road in Port Harcourt were all vandalised because they were in remote areas. In Lagos State, because they are located within the city, the chances of their being save is there. In Asaba, most of the installed solar street lights were completely vandalised. Same story abound in many other locations including Abuja FCT. You must also bear in mind that Lagos has improved on its security network since the inception of Raji Fashola’s government, so the possibility of safeguarding public infrastructure has improved there.

    Are you saying it is the security of the solar panels and other equipment that are keeping telecoms operators away from embracing renewable energy?

    There are two principal factors. The first is security while the second is non-avalability of land to accommodate the solar panels that will be able to power base stations.

    What peculiar challenges do you have as an operator in the renewable energy sector?

    The peculiar challenge we have is the initial cost of deployment and lack of banking sector support. Besides most contracts in the sector are not given to the experts for a reason I may ascribe to corrupt practices. I get ashamed as an expert each time I see failed solar street lights. Its not encouraging at all.

     

    People have talked about inconsistent government policy, especially as it concerns duty paid on some imported components of renewable energy. What is the situation?

    As an expert, I believe that the misunderstanding we have in tariffs with officials of Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) can be attributed to lack of knowledge on the part of the NCS officers. They are supposed to have gone for training to understand some of these things, about the interpretation of certain items especially in a new sector like renewable energy. Renewable energy is new worldwide, even standards are yet to be formed in all aspects of the components of the renewable energy sector, so, many of the components are yet to have standards so, they are not well known. In Nigeria, our Customs men fail in their duty for refusing to learn in some cases and insist on what they think is right even when is very clear that they are wrong in some of the clasifications, so when you stand to educate them, they just do what they like. Therefore we are discouraged from importing a lot of things because the duty will make the cost to be completely outrageous. Let me give you an example; if you import a solar freezer, which is just like ordinary freezer because they look alike, but what makes the difference is the compressor. The compressor for solar freezer uses battery, where conventional freezers uses power supplied from the national grid or generators. Because the cost of the solar compressor is extremely high, being a high-tech compressor, if I bring it into the country and pay the same duty as would be paid on conventional refrigerator, I cannot sell it. The retail price will be out of reach. Now see this logic and you can understand me better. If I import the solar freezer, with solar panel and battery, all packed together as one package, it will be seen as a solar freezer and I will pay zero duty, but not so when the solar freezer is imported alone when I will be made to pay 35% duty. But the fact is that one may not need to import the freezer and the batteries all the time. If you look at it, they cannot understand what is inside. That is why I said they still need training to understand some of these things and be able to make some logical decisions in that respect. So generally, the inability of the NCS to correctly interpret the tariff is still a problem but I believe that in the next three, four years, we would have overcome all these challenges.

    And also the inconstancy of the officials of the NCS is another problem. An officer may be there for one year within which period he must have learned certain things, but the following year, he is removed and posted to another location. Another person replaces him and you are back to square one. And here, we are not known to have continuity in everything we do. Despite all my views as stated so far let it be on record that I have faith in this country. I have travelled far and wide across the continents and after all This is where I belong and am proud to be part of it contributing my small quota in building the place I can call my Home, my Nation and my Pride.

     

     

     

  • Will power roadmap bring sustainable light?

    Will power roadmap bring sustainable light?

    When President Goodluck Jonathan unveiled the power sector reform roadmap on August 3, 2010, it was seen as a pathfinder to the country’s age-long power problems. Two years on, the roadmap is still a work in progress, writes EMEKA UGWUANYI Assistant Editor (Energy).

     

    The availability of reliable electric power to the homes and businesses of our citizens has been one item in our national life that we have approached with so much hope and yet experienced so much frustration over the past decades. Various regimes, in the distant past, paid little attention to the sector but in the recent decades, subsequent regimes have put in billions of naira to reverse the neglect and mismanagement which has characterised the sector.

    “I and my Vice President are conscious that what we do with the Nigerian electricity supply industry will go a long way in determining whether Nigeria remains in darkness or joins the rest of the world in the race for development. Our commitment is to bring an end to our nation’s stunted growth and usher in the fresh air of prosperity by pursuing a new era of sector-wide reform which is driven by improved service delivery to every class of customers in the Nigerian electricity sector.

    “The full implementation of the electric power sector reform has been a key priority for this administration. We established the Presidential Action Committee on Power (PACP) with a view to eliminating red tape and the often over-bureaucratic and inefficient nature of decision-making in government.

    “The Presidential Task Force on Power (PTFP) is the engine room that drives the vision of the PACP. The PTFP has the mandate to develop the roadmap and provide monitoring to ensure effective implementation of the plan. Their activities will introduce a greater degree of transparency to the way in which we implement the reforms and greater accountability on the part of those responsible.” These were the words of President Goodluck Jonathan while presentating the roadmap.

    Going by the President’s comments, the roadmap was borne out of the seemingly intractable power problems. Despite funds sunk into the sector by successive administrations, no tangible results were achieved.

    The roadmap is a well-intentioned statement of milestones to be achieved at specific periods, designed to prepare the sector for takeover by private operators because of government’s seeming failure to manage the utility. Until last year total power wheeled into the national grid didn’t exceed 3000 megawatts (MW).

    Besides, if the government had the capacity to generate more megawatts and the will to wheel it into the grid, the grid appeared so fragile that it hardly took 3000MW hence the incessant system collapse, which threw the country into total blackout most times.

    Although the roadmap failed to meet almost all its targets in generation, transmission and distribution of power and the privatisation timetable, it was able to give direction to the sector. The generation figures, improvement in transmission and distribution reports by the government have become more dependable and most of all, the transfer of ownership and management of the power sector asset to the private sector appear more realistic.

    Power supply is becoming less erratic, and besides some security concerns, genuine investors’ confidence is increasing but unless the privatisation is done right, there may be a problem. There is need to ensure that the preferred bidders that would take over these assets are desirous to take Nigeria out of darkness on sustainable basis.

    In order not to completely put the fate of over 160 million Nigerians, the economy and developmental aspirations into the hands of one person or a company, the government structured the privatisation terms differently for the various power assets, making the private investor the owner, with the federal and state governments owning equity shares.

     

    Privatisation

     

    The Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) is saddled with the responsibility of ensuring that the 18 successor companies unbundled from the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) secure the right investors in terms of technical and financial competence.

    The assets for privatisation include 11 distribution companies (Discos) and six generation companies (Gencos). The distribution companies include Abuja Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Benin Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Enugu Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Eko Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Ibadan Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Ikeja Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Jos Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Kaduna Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Kano Electricity Distribution Company Plc Port Harcourt Electricity Distribution Company Plc, and Yola Electricity Distribution Company Plc.

    The Gencos include Ughelli Power Plc; and Sapele Power Plc in Delta State; Geregu Power Plc in Kogi State; and Afam Power Plc in Rivers State. These four power plants are thermal plants that run on gas while the remaining two – Shiroro Power Plc; and Kainji Power Plc both in Niger State are hydro power plants.

    The 11 discos are part of the 18 successor companies unbundled from the PHCN but because none of the bidders met the requirement for the Kaduna Electricity Distribution Company, the 21 firms currently shortlisted would be jostling for 10 discos.

     

    Shortlisted Discos

     

    Oando Consortium; Vigeo Holdings, Gumco, African Corporation AFC &CESC, Honeywell, and 18 other firms were among the shortlisted by the BPE from the 54 firms that submitted bids to acquire the 11 electricity distribution companies.

    Having passed the technical evaluation bid test, the BPE will on October 16, open the financial bids for the 21 companies.

    For the GenCos, the BPE had last Tuesday opened the financial bid for the preferred for eight investors that were shortlisted for five generation companies as the three firms that submitted bids for the sixth GenCo – Afam Power Plc, couldn’t meet the requirements. The eight companies offered a total of $1,119,363,150.05 for the five power plants.

     

    Firms for Discos

     

    The eight that qualified for the five companies are Amperion Power Distribution Company Limited (Geregu), Mainstream Energy Solutions Limited (Kainji), North-South Power Company Limited (Shiroro), Amperion Power Distribution Company Limited (Ughelli), Feniks Electricity Limited (Ughelli), Transcorp & Woodrock/ Symbion/ Medea/ PSL/ Thomassen (Ughelli), CMEC/Eurafric Energy JV (Sapele) and JBN-Nestoil Power Services Limited (Sapele).

    The NCP reminded Amperion Power Distribution Limited to be aware that the rules allow them to win only one Genco. Accordingly, if they win both Ughelli Power Plc and Geregu Power Plc, they will have to give up one.

    The Federal Government is selling majority stakes in power plants and letting private investors buy as much as 70 per cent of 11 distribution companies spun out of the former state-owned utility as it seeks private investment to curb power shortages.

    The Chairman, Technical Committee of NCP, Mr Atedo Peterside said all the winning bids are “subject to the approval” of the National Council on Privatisation headed by Vice President Namadi Sambo. Bidders have 15 days after the final approval to post a bank guarantee for 15 per cent of the bid amount and pay 25 per cent of their bid within another 15 days after the deal has been signed, he said. The balance should be paid over six months or as agreed with the privatisation agency.

    The transmission segment of the sector is wholly retained by the Federal Government but has been given out on management contract to a Canadian company – Manitoba Hydro International, for three years. On expiration of this term, the government may terminate the contract if it feels satisfied with the ability of Nigerians to manage it effectively but otherwise, the contract would be extended.

    Initially, the completion of the privatisation programme was scheduled to end by February this year but had to be extended by eight months to accommodate the requests and desires of the investors who submitted bids for the generation and transmission and distribution assets.

    But because the entire roadmap was anchored on a customer-driven sector-wide plan to achieve stable power supply, it was gathered that the extension of the privatisation timelines by the BPE became imperative. A BPE source explained that the bidders said they were not carried along on the initial privatisation package because they were not given the opportunity to carry out due diligence on the assets they submitted bids for and also measure the bankability of the projects, among others. It was in view of these requests that the BPE reviewed the timetable to October.

    The roadmap expressed such fears when it said that investors would be reluctant to make large-scale investments in the upstream and downstream sectors of the electricity industry unless they are confident that commensurate investments in the midstream sector will also take place: This was the reason the management of transmission was contracted out to a private company, the government said has both the requisite project management and technical expertise.

    The transaction timeline by BPE showed that the evaluation of the technical bids for the successor companies in generation and distribution companies would take place between August 14 and 28, 2012 after which the NCP would approve and announce the results of the technical evaluation by September 11, 2012. Although, there were slight shifts by few days in some of the schedules such as the announcement of the bidders that scaled the technical valuation of Discos’ bids, but the BPE stuck to its October deadline.

    The timeline for the shortlisted bidders for generation companies to submit their letters of credit was September 18, 2012 while October 2, 2012 is the deadline for shortlisted bidders for distribution companies, which the NCP would approve to finally pave way for the opening of financial bids of the shortlisted investors.

    The announcement of the preferred bidders for the generating companies, the BPE said, is October 9, 2012 while October 23, 2012 is the date for the announcement of the preferred bidders for the distribution companies.

    The BPE said that alterations in the announcement dates of some results such that occurred when the successful companies that passed the technical bids evaluation for distribution companies, was to ensure transparency in the privatization process.

     

    Gencos’ terms of

    privatisation

     

    The two privatised hydro power stations would be on concession for between 25-30 years while the four thermal plants would be 100 per cent sold but original plan in the roadmap was that thermal generating plants would be privatised via the sale of a minimum of 51 per cent equity to core investors that clearly demonstrate the technical and financial ability to operate and expand each plant.

    The roadmap further noted that care would be taken, by working closely with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) to ensure that a monopoly or oligopoly of market power in the generation sector is not acquired through these divestitures.

    The BPE said that certainly the preferred private investor for any asset would have at least 51 per cent equity holding. It said the government deliberately structured it that way to ensure that all the concerns are private sector-run; adding that with 51 per cent or more equity shares, the preferred private sector bidder will have more directors on the board and exercise all the necessary powers.

    The states where the assets situate were mandated to own shares not more 20 per cent in such assets but apart from equities due to them in that regard, they (states) would further be considered for extra equity ownership, which would be based on the quantum of investment they made in such states. Most of the state governments had immensely invested in some the assets located in their areas. Therefore, the extra equity holding they will be considered for would be more of compensation and that extra equity should come from the Federal Government’s owned equity.

    The states that made investments in the power facilities would submit their claims (investments made in the facilities) to the government. Such claims would be evaluated and ratified by the NERC. On the basis of the feedback from NERC, the Federal Government will determine the level of extra equity to be allocated the states from its shares.

     

    Discos’ terms of

    privatisation

     

    As stipulated in Gencos, the preferred private sector bidder would have the highest equity holding of 51 per cent or more in each of the 11 distribution companies to be able to be in charge and take decisions. But the difference here is that none of the Discos would be sold 100 per cent. The federal and state governments where the distribution companies are located, would own statutory or recommended equities of not more than 20 per cent and extra equities, which would be measured by level of the state government’s investment in the asset.

     

    Targets, misses,

    achievements

     

    The Federal Government in the roadmap expressed commitment to achieve 14,000 MW of power generation capacity, which would be available by December 2013. Out of this, 4,500 MW would come from PHCN generation assets, 4,775 MW from the NIPP plants and 3,300 MW from independent power producers such as Shell and Agip, among others. Shell’s Afam VI in Rivers State, is a combined cycle plant with installed capacity of 650MW while Agip’s Okpai plant in Delta State has installed capacity of 460MW. In the short term, the government’s generation target achievable by April 2011 was put at 7000MW.

    To meet Vision 20:2020 target of 40,000MW, the government said it would require investments in power generating capacity alone of at least US$ 3.5 billion per annum for the next 10 years. None of the targets was met as the PHCN assets currently generates about 3000MW and the NIPP 1150MW. The Managing Director, Niger Delta Power Holding Company (NDPHC), which supervises the 10 medium sized power plants being constructed under the National Integrated Power Project (NIPP), Mr. James Olotu, said the Federal Government has so far spent about $8 billion on the projects.

    Olotu said out of the NIPP’s 10 plants, four are operational, which include Olorunsogo in Ogun State, Omotosho in Ondo State, Sapele in Delta State and Alaoji in Abia State. Alaoji according to him, came on board this month.

    He also noted that the total supply capacity from the four plants, which currently is wheeled into the national grid stands at 1150 megawatts (MW), which is expected to jump to about 1500mw by December.

    The other six plants, he added, are under construction and are at between 80 per cent and 90 per cent completion stage.

    He said: “By the end of this year, from all the stations, we will be looking at about 2500mw, which would be dependent on gas delivery. We are also building hundreds of thousands of kilometres of transmission line across the country as substations to support those transmission lines.

    “The company commissioned 150MVA transmission facility at the Ikeja West Transmission Station and another 150MVA would be commissioned this month at Akangba. Several sizes of this transmission facilities and smaller one have been commissioned and more would be commissioned before the end of this year.

    “We are also building several thousands of kilometres of lines for distribution and also the infrastructure and substations to support it. We are also building gas pipelines within the same fund to ensure that wherever you have a power plant there is gas that is flowing there and there is a line pipe that will be feeding the plant.”

     

    New projects

     

    The Federal Government revealed in the roadmap that it had plans that would lead to the commencement of construction of the Mambilla Power plant, which would have an installed capacity of 2,600MW and Zungeru Power with a capacity of 700MW as well as expand the Gurara Hydro power plant, which currently has installed 30MW to a capacity of 300 MW, 200 MW dual-fired power plant in Kaduna, which are expected to be completed within the next six years to complete.

    The Minister of State for Power Arc Darius Dickson Ishaku told the NCP last month that the Kaduna power plant is in progress, noting that eight gas turbine generators for the plant are at Onne port while the Mambilla installed capacity of 2600MW as contained in the roadmap has been revised to 3050MW. Update on the project, according to him, is still at bankable feasibility studies. The feasibility studies’ completion is last quarter of this year, adding that the entire Mambilla project would be financed through equity debt structure of 80:20 per cent ration by Exim Bank of China. The engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) would be completed by first quarter of 2013, he added. For the Zungeru plant, the minister said the project’s contract renegotiation is ongoing; the procurement of project management consultancy at BPP certification level while the environmental impact assessment has been completed.

    He also stated that the Federal Ministry of Power is in discussion with EximmBank of China for the funding of loan component, adding that the government is constructing a 10.75MW wind power plant in Katsin a, which consists of 37 wind turbines. The project, he said, was 98 per cent completion as at August 30, 2012.