At the peak of the migrant crises in the last quarter of last year, some big European countries notably Germany, Austria made a huge show, of welcoming the mostly Syrian refugees who were angrily fenced off, by middle size and struggling central European countries. The United States was moved by Europe’s so-called act of hospitality that President Barack Obama announced that the U.S should take in about 10,000 migrants.
Currently, Germans who trooped out in their numbers to welcome the refugees are organizing huge demonstration in Cologne to call on their government to slam close door against further influx of migrants.
Recently in London, a donor conference to help Syrian refugees was organized and a pledge of US$10billion was made. The much anticipated Syrian political dialogue that managed to open in Geneva was hurriedly closed. The Syrian opposition consisting of hard salafist armed group dragged their feet on attendance, making reference to the humanitarian disaster in Syria and ridiculously setting the condition that the Syrian government cease military operations before they can attend. There posturing did not fool anyone, since it is well known that the Syrian regime fights to retain the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Syrian state. The Geneva conference, which the opposition grudgingly attended, ended sooner after started as the Syrian military cut off the supply line to the armed insurgents through Turkey.
However, the West mostly the United States, the United Kingdom, even France made shows of their concern to the Syrian humanitarian disaster and political quagmire but conveniently forgets that its machinations to foster regime change in Syria, as it has done in neighbouring Iraq and Libya, were at the root of the crises. When Syrians peacefully demanded political reforms in 2011, following the outbreak of popular protests which started in Tunisia, the Syrian Baathist regime responded with strings of political reforms, including, ending the leading and vanguard role of the Baath party and in its place a multi-party competitive process was instituted.
Before the reforms could be tested on ground, the West seized the moment to orchestrate its preferred political project of regime change, which it has successfully implemented in Libya, but with dire consequences that continues to manifest up to this day. As in Libya where extremist jihadists of all hue were encouraged to fight to topple the country’s regime, these hot-heads from Libya and elsewhere were encouraged to pour into Syria to fight. Seizing the vacuum created by the armed insurgency in Syria and sectarian divide in Iraq, the monstrous Islamic state of Iraq and the Levant-ISIS,ISIL was conjured up to put further pressure on the already fractured states of Iraq and Syria. In driving Syria to the brink with its project of regime change, the West and more particularly the United States of America, Britain and France, are complicit in the outbreak of the migrant crises which is been merely treated as humanitarian crises, instead of, as an outcome of a deliberate policy choice of destabilization of the region. Before Russia took the bold military step of helping the suicidal jihadists to meet their creator, earlier than they would have loved, they prance literally unchallenged in their Syrian-Iraqi turf; inspite of the U.S-led coalition aerial attacks. They were making territorial gains and show of their barbaric act of beheadings.
Since Russia entered the fray, the ISIS barbaric army is on the run. The West recently is claiming that Russia is doing more to help the Syrian regime than targeting ISIS. But it is undeniable that due to the Russian military operations, ISIS has been considerably degraded. The rump of the Syrian armed insurgents, including the Al-Qaeda affiliate, Al Nusra front are terribly hemorrhaging. With muted calls by the West to the Russians to halt military operations against ISIS in Syria, they are attempting to throw a life line to the monster of the Islamic state from the back door, notwithstanding high sounding rhetoric on the contrary.
Syria is pivotal Arab nation with a long history of stability in a turbulent region. At a point, Syria was the guarantor of stability to the neighbouring Lebanon. Syria is both secular and the most tolerant of Arab states and has the largest number of Christian minorities among other Arab states. Its Baathist regime may be authoritarian, but is also among the most urbane in the Arab world. The country is dotted with historic sites including a community that still speaks Christ early language. All these lay in ruins currently as the Syrian government struggles to retain a modicum of the sovereign status of the Syrian state. Apart from parochial West’s foreign policies, the Syrian government would have been their best regional ally in their fight against extremism, the potent threat to the West’s values and way of life. Syria has so far, better prospects of democratizing than the Wahabist Saudi Arabia regime and other closest Arab states in the Gulf. Ironically, the two major states in the region-Syria and Iran, with reasonable democratic contents in their leadership recruitment are the West main bogeyman, while other assorted Arab autocracies, without the faintest hint of democratization, are the West’s chubby buddies in the region.
The open arms of some Western countries to welcome the Syrian refugees and even the funds raised to ameliorate their terrible conditions are welcome, but are really unsustainable palliatives, which the Syrians did not even need, had their country not been trapped in the devious ploy of “regime change”. Instead of the rigmarole in Geneva of which the latest round is the fourth, the West and its Arab allies, could just recall their attack dogs in Syria and let the country set up its own machinery for reconciliation, reconstruction and reform. The Syrians of all political persuasions have what it takes to retrieve their country from the brink, as long as outsiders can keep away.
- Onunaiju is a journalist based in Abuja.