Tag: tango

  • The tango between Senate and AGF

    SIR: Recently the Senate summoned the Attorney General of the Federation to explain why he was prosecuting the Senate President and the Deputy Senate President over alleged forgery of the Senate rules.

    The AGF sent a representative in the person of Chief OkoiObono-Obla, Special Adviser to the President on Prosecution. The chief was not granted audience. He later on addressed the press where he submitted that the Senate has no powers to summon the AGF on the issue. This comment has raised some dust in legal and political circles.

    Under S.67 (2) A minister of the government of the federation SHALL attend the National Assembly if invited to explain the conduct of the ministry and when the affairs of the ministry is under discussion.

    Under S 88 of the Constitution also, the National Assembly has powers to investigate any Ministry, Agency, department or persons and by so doing invite any such person.

    Under S 89 of the Constitution, the National Assembly also has power to summon anyone in Nigeria to give it to further any investigation under S 88.

    Finally under S 89 (2) The National Assembly can further issue any warrant through the Inspector General of Police or any police officer to compel the attendance of the person summoned.

    However, the AGF is a sui generis minister. He is unlike any other minister in the cabinet. In fact his portfolio is the only one provided for in the constitution. Other ministries can be scrapped, merged and renamed as the President desires but not the ministry headed by the AGF.The AGF is both the minister of justice and the chief law officer of the country. In fact many have campaigned for these two huge responsibilities to be separated to avoid confusions like the one we are talking about here.

    Of course, the Senate has the powers to summon any minister including the minister of justice.But when the AGF is acting as a law officer and a prosecutor he becomes an officer of the court and a sort of god unto himself. That is what Chief Obono-Oblawas saying when he said: “The Honourable Attorney General in  exercise of his power over public prosecution under Section 174 subsection 1 of the Constitution is not answerable to any authority or person and as such the exercise of this power is not subject to review by any authority, even the courts. See State v Ilori (1983) 2 SC 155′.”

    As the minister of Justice, the AGF is part of the executive but when acting as a prosecutor he is strictly part of the judiciary.

    The Senate can summon the AGF as the minister of Justice to give account of his ministry but he cannot be summoned while acting as a prosecutor. That’s what the constitution says and that is what the Supreme Court decided in State v. Ilori.

    The Senate cannot terrorise the judiciary under the guise of oversight functions. The constitution that anointed it with the powers to oversee ministers is the same constitution that anointed the AGF with the vast powers to prosecute anyone without being answerable to anyone.

     

    • First Baba Isa,

    Abuja.

  • PDP and the Makarfi-Sheriff tango

    PDP and the Makarfi-Sheriff tango

    There is no end in sight to the leadership crisis in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). The Chairman of the Caretaker Committee, Senator Ahmed Makarfi, and the embattled former National Chairman, Senator Modu Sheriff, have shifted the supremacy battle to the court. Assistant Editor GBADE OGUNWALE writes on the effects of the protracted crisis on the opposition party.

    The festering leadership crisis in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has polarised the party. Senator Ahmed Makarfi and Senator Ali Modu Sheriff. Makarfi and Sheriff have not reached compromise.

    The two gentlemen are a pole apart in deeds and actions. Makarfi is soft natured, soft spoken with an unmistakable stamp of authority.

    The authority oozes from the trust his voice conveys to his audience. The supple-looking former Kaduna State Governor can be firm, if he had to. He’s urbane and wears a modest outlook wherever he finds himself. On the other hand, the brusque ex Borno State governor is direct, prickly and usually unapologetic. Sheriff doesn’t thrive much with euphemism making his point. Sheriff proved this in a recent verbal exchange with Makarfi in the course of the ongoing quake in the party.

    Makarfi had fired the first salvo when he accused Sheriff of been hired by the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) to destroy the PDP. But, Sheriff did not make his response to Makarfi’s accusation in just one sentence. He said it was indeed, the ex Kaduna governor and one of his team mates, Senator Ben Obi were in cahoots with an unnamed APC chieftain.

    He said: “If there are people in the PDP working for the APC, it’s Makarfi and Obi. Makarfi should not force me to reveal details that I should not reveal under normal circumstances. Makarfi and Obi have gone to visit this APC chieftain in his house twice and this particular individual is still in the APC.

    It would have been better if the man had left the APC to join the PDP. They are reserving the 2019 presidential ticket of the PDP for this individual who has been funding their activities. He continues, “If Makarfi continues to attack my person, I will be forced to reveal further details of their alliance. He’s not done. “Everybody in Nigeria knows this particular APC chieftain who wants to contest for president in 2019 on the platform of the PDP. So Makarfi should just shut up”.

    Since then, the accusations by the Makarfi camp, wrapping Sheriff up as a hireling of the APC, got simmered. The Abuja national secretariat of the party has been under lock and key for the past two weeks in the aftermath of attacks and counter-attacks by hirelings of the two factions. It was a fierce battle by the two camps to take over the secretariat building.

    Makarfi accused Sheriff of bringing in ECOMOG, a byword used to depict local political thugs associated with the latter. Sheriff retorted that Makarfi unleashed “Fulani herdsmen” on Prof. Wale Oladipo and Alhaji Adewole Adeyanju, National Secretary and National Auditor respectively.

    According to him, the mob was sponsored to cause bodily harm to the two party chiefs were at the secretariat to resume duties for the day. After a great deal of feather ruffling, the two gentlemen were allowed to leave the secretariat building with their bones and limbs intact. The political animosity between the two combatants was ignited at the party’s May 21 botched convention.

    The governors arrived the Port Harcourt venue of the convention only to tell Sheriff to back down as the National Chairman. His tenure, they said, had expired. To fill the vacuum, they hurriedly clobbered a Caretaker Committee, with Makarfi as chairman.

    Sheriff has been vehement in denouncing the committee, describing it as illegal at every given opportunity. The Makarfi committee has also been similarly tempered, particularly when arguments centred around where the leadership authority lies. Litigations started cascading over one another, as the two sides appeared to have made the courtrooms pilgrimage grounds. At the last count, such cases still pending before the various courts exceed the count of the fingers on one hand.

    The next few days will certainly see the loser rushing to perfect appeal papers with retained attorneys for onward transmission to the appellate court. It’s a political war of attrition that the combatants themselves must have envisaged. Sounding a bit reflective at one of his many media outings last week, Sheriff had offered to step down, if the court so ruled. But he did not specify whether he meant the court of first instance, the appellate court, or the apex court that has the final say.

    How long Sheriff could drag the matter remains a subject of conjecture for now. In courting Sheriff, the PDP governors must have underestimated the extent of the former Borno governor’s enormous capacity for the dogfight. Narrating how he was dragged into the chairmanship race, Sheriff said he never contemplated becoming the party’s chair.

    He was backing the aspiration of a former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Alhaji Mohammed Abba Gana, who was one of the five contestants for the position at the time. Said he: “I was backing Abba Gana to become PDP chairman because I see him as my brother from the same Borno State as me. But, the governors, four of them, came to me to say that they wanted me to be the chairman. I told them that it would be morally wrong for me to accept the offer when I was already supporting one of the aspirants. I was already holding meetings with Abba Gana and I had assured him of my full support. But the governors insisted that I should come forward and take the job”.

    On why the two factions have failed to heed a call by the police for a peaceful resolution through dialogue, Sheriff said he was waiting for Makarfi to submit the list of his dialogue team to him. “I am waiting for Makarfi to formally submit the names on his list to me because I am the national chairman”, he said. Although the Makarfi camp has continued to express its willingness to dialogue with Sheriff, there are no visible signs to indicate that either side is predisposed to meeting across the conference.

    The two sides have returned to court, following the verdict of the High Court in Port-Harcourt that the Caretaker Committee was properly set up. As the waiting game is on, the two sides have gone a great length trying to outwit the other through claims and counter claims, actions and counteractions. It started with the Makarfi committee conducting a primary to pick a candidate for the party’s Edo state governorship election coming up in September. A candidate emerged in the person of Pastor Osagie Ize-Iyamu.

    A few days after, Sheriff also set up his own team to conduct a parallel primary election to elect a different candidate. Prior to that, Sheriff had announced the suspension of the executive committee of the Edo state chapter on the strength of “various petitions” against the leadership of the chapter.

    But, the Makarfi camp had repudiated the said suspension order, insisting that Sheriff didn’t have the powers to take such a step and urged stakeholders in the chapter to ignore him. While the tango was going on, a court in the Federal Capital Territory voided the amendment to a section of the party’s constitution that facilitated the appointment of Sheriff as the national chairman. The Makarfi Committee has advised Sheriff to retrace his steps, based on the judgment. But, the Sheriff camp has said that the court did not sack the embattled chairman and that the judgement of was being misinterpreted. The court, presided over by Justice Valentine Ashi, nullified the 2014 PDP constitution amendment upon which Sheriff was appointed the PDP chairman.

    The court described the amendment as illegal and a violation of the Electoral Act. The Secretary of the Ahmed Makarfi -led caretaker committee, Senator Ben Obi, in an interview yesterday described the judgement as a welcome development. Said he, “We expect more positive court rulings in the days ahead in favour of our party. It is time for them to face the truth and retrace their steps”.

    He called on Sheriff and his supporters to stop their hard line posture and cooperate with the caretaker committee to move the party forward. “We believe that truth must be upheld; we want all hands to be on deck to chart the way forward”, Obi added. Repudiating the judgment, the National Secretary of the Sheriff faction, Prof. Adewale Oladipo said in a statement yesterday that “this is completely false and a clear misrepresentation of the ruling of the court as it never gave any ruling ousting the national chairman.

    The statement said, “Our attention has been drawn to reports circulating in the media that a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court has ousted the National Chairman of the PDP, Sen. Ali-Modu Sheriff. “For the avoidance of doubt, the court only heard and delivered judgment on a matter concerning certain amendments in the PDP constitution, which has nothing to do with the election of Senator Ali Modu Sheriff as the national chairman or even that of his predecessor, Alhaji Adamu Muazu.

    “Senator Ali Modu Sheriff was duly elected as the national chairman of the PDP. He still holds office as the national chairman and has not been removed by any court. We, therefore, urge those misleading the media and the unsuspecting public to desist from such. The media is also urged to always cross-check their facts before going to press”. So for the PDP, it’s one week, one trouble.

  • 2018 World Cup Qualifier: Eagles, Swaziland tango in Garden City

    2018 World Cup Qualifier: Eagles, Swaziland tango in Garden City

    The Super Eagles will welcome the King’s Shield to the Adokiye Amiesiamaka Stadium for the return leg of their 2018 World Cup qualifying second round match next month

    Goal can reveal that the second leg, second round 2018 World Cup qualifier between Nigeria and Swaziland will take place in Port Harcourt on November 17, four days after the first leg in Lobamba.

    The Super Eagles would travel to southern Africa for the first leg on November 13 before aiming to seal passage into the third round with a win in the Rivers State capital.

    “The first leg will be played on  November 13 while the return leg will be played in Port Harcourt on November 17,” Dr Mohammed Sanusi, general secretary of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) told Goal.

    Players from Europe are expected to arrive camp by November 9.

    Earlier, the NFF announced via its website that the first leg game will take place under floodlight at the Somhlolo Stadium by 7pm. The 20,000-capacity arena is all standing.

    The return leg will be in Port Harcourt, the city that is fast becoming the new home of the Super Eagles after it played host to September’s international friendly with Niger and October’s African Nations Championship qualifying game against Burkina Faso.

    The NFF has not concluded plans about which city will host Egypt in the 2017 Africa Cup of Nations qualifiers, a game which had previously been slated for Kaduna.

    Dr Sanusi said that decision would be made after next month’s matches.

  • Eagles, Ghana tango in London

    Eagles, Ghana tango in London

    Nigeria’s Super Eagles have proposed a friendly against perennial rivals Ghana in London next month, AfricanFootball.com has specially gathered.

    The Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) wish to make the most of next month’s FIFA friendly window which will allow them to play another match outside the 2017 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) qualifier in Tanzania between September 4 and 6.

    World football governing body FIFA cancelled a similar proposal earlier this year because it contravened a new rule which said a team could not play international friendlies within three days in two confederations.

    A top source informed AfricanFootball.com: “There is a proposal for Nigeria to play against arch-rivals Ghana in London after they would have played the AFCON qualifier in Tanzania. Discussions are on-going and we will just have to wait and see if this comes through.”

    Both West African rivals have clashed several times in London with their last such clash being in October 2011, when they played out a goalless draw,

    Earlier this year, a home-based Super Eagles team pipped Ghana Olympic team courtesy of an Emem Eduok goal to open the Akwa Ibom International Stadium in Uyo.

  • Varsity, medical students tango over fees

    Varsity, medical students tango over fees

    The Olabisi Onabanjo University (OOU) in Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State and its medical students are squabbling over “extra tuition fees”. The students are claiming that it is a ploy to extort them, but the university denies the allegation. The controversy, which is stalling the students’ induction into the medical profession, may not be resolved if the government does not intervene, reports ERNEST NWOKOLO (Abeokuta).

    Trouble is brewing at the Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital (OOUTH) in Sagamu, Ogun State.

    Medical students of the university are on collision course with the management over what they call “extra tuition fees”. The hospital is the medical training of the university, which is in Ago Iwoye.

    The students are accusing the authority of forcing them to pay higher tuition fees without apparent reason. Each student is to pay N150,000 (for indigenes of Ogun State) and N230,000 (non-indigenes), as tuition fees for two years extended stay in school. But the students will have none of it.

    The university has denied this of extortion claim.

    On February 25, the students stormed the House of Assembly to urge the lawmakers to prevail on the university to desist from extorting them via nebulous tuition fee.

    At the lawmakers’ instance, the university management convened a meeting of the students and their parents on March 3 to resolve the issue.

    At the meeting chaired by the Vice-Chancellor (VC), Prof Saburi Adesanya, it was resolved that no student should pay any extra tuition fee aside the mandatory fees for six sessions and a one-off developmental levy of N40,000 to assist the university. At the meeting were the Deputy Vice Chancellor, Prof Adewale Sule-Odu, Provost of Obafemi Awolowo College of Health Science, Prof Yomi Ogun and Chairman of the Parents’ Forum Rev Canon Remi Onajole.

    The VC was said to have accepted the agreement reached at the meeting, but the management later reneged on its implementation and pasted a notice after two weeks, directing the students to pay the additional tuition fees.

    The students have vowed not to pay what would amount to 10 years tuition for a six-year programme.

    According to them, they should not be made to suffer further financial pains for an irregular academic calendar that foisted two additional years upon them for no fault of theirs.

    The President of the Students Union Government (SUG), Comrade Ifade Olusegun said the problem had been on for long, adding that despite their protest, the authority appears unrelenting.

    Olusegun said: “It is unfair to charge the medical students extra fee for the extra years they are to spend for disruption of their academic calendar brought about by lecturers strike, doctors’ strike and crisis between management and non-academic staff.

    “The students are not the cause. Medical programme is six sessions and they have already paid for it. Now, the university wants them to pay for the additional years imposed upon them. This is not fair,” he said.

    It was gathered that following last year’s strike by the academic staff of public universities that spanned over five months, coupled with the internal crisis within OOU brought about the by the Senior Staff Association of Nigerian Universities (SSANU) OOU chapter and other non – teaching staff who at different time disrupted university calendar while agitating for better remuneration and other benefits. In all these, the medical students were worst affected.

    The strike disrupted their programme and they have been asked by the university to stay extra two years than necessary to enable them complete the theoretical and clinical (practical) work for the award of M.B.B.S (General Medicine and Dental Surgery).

    Not done, the management said they would also pay tuition fee for the extra years to be spent and this is already taking a toll on them as the final year medicals have been prevented from doing the required induction.

    It was gathered that following the intervention of some government officials, the management asked indigenes to pay N45,000 while non – indigenes are expected to pay more which the students accepted. However, Yemi Adegbesan, President of the OOU Medical Students Association, claims the VC, made a volte -face and directed them to pay N150,000 or N230,000.

    He said neither him nor his peers understood how the university management arrived at the new figure of N75,000 (indigenes) or N115,000 (non-indigenes) per student yearly for the two extra sessions.

    Describing the fees as illegal, Adegbesan said the medical school curriculum runs for six years, which requires them to pay for six sessions, with or without strikes by academic or non-academic staff of the institution.

    Adegbesan said: “Prof Saburi Adesanya is not being fair, here. He has refused to allow final year medical students from OOU do their induction just because he wants them to pay extra school fees for two sessions. The students have extra time in school because of ASUU, SSANU, NASU and other unions’ strikes. We had last December 17 written a petition to the House on the issue. But, up till now, nothing has been done.”

    He pleaded with the Speaker of the State House of Assembly, Prince Suraj Adekunbi, to urgently wade into the matter as “time is running out on the side of the final year students”.

    In line with Adekunbi’s promise that the lawmakers would look into the matter, the House of Assembly has scheduled a meeting with the warring parties next Monday. The university’s management, students Senate and the Governing Council have been summoned to appear before the House’s Committee on Education, Ethics and Petition on Monday next week.

    Assuring the students of resolution of the problem, Adekunbi said: “I also have a brother in your school that is in his tenth year, so I understand your plight but I want you to have confidence in us that we’ll do the right thing and everything will be done in accordance with the provision of the law”.

    Denying the students’ claims of extortion and malpractice, the OOU management said the final year medical students were not asked to pay extra tuition due to strike in the university.

    The Head, Corporate Affairs Division, Mr Niyi Oduwole, said the extension of period of medical students in the clinical school was due to strike by workers’ unions at the teaching hospital, which have necessitated the payment.

    “To set the records straight, we want to make it abundantly clear that no student, including our medical students, was directed to pay extra tuition due to any strike in the university. It would be recalled that the recent national industrial action embarked by staff unions that lasted for over six months did not attract any additional fees for the students. Our students resumed for the continuation of their academic activities without paying extra fees including the medical students.

    “However, extension of period of study of medical students in the clinical school due to strike in the teaching hospital by doctors and other ancillary medical personnel may occur. This did happen to the current final year medical students where there was a prolonged academic year due to the 2010/2011 strike by the Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital staff that lasted for about nine months. This strike cannot be reflected on normal university calendar like other unions strike.

    “The university had to make ad-hoc arrangement to accommodate the backlog of students from the pre-medical school, thereby resulting in about six sets of students in the clinical programme instead of normal three sets. The stress imposed by overcrowding led to further extension. In totality, the students affected have to spend extra sessions above the normal academic sessions.”

    However, the students fault the claim of extra fees on this basis. They argue that the university incurred no loss in revenue from their prolonged stay in school as six sets of medical students are expected to pay tuition every session.

    They said even the Part three students who have been asked by the university to go on “Leave of Absence” have paid for the current session and would also pay for the next session when it resumes in three months time.

    A final year (500 level) medical student, who desired anonymity, explained why the 300 Level medical students are on leave of absence.

    He said: “The medical curriculum is structured in such a way that after Part 3, you write your first professional exam (Part I MBBS exam) in Anatomy, Physiology & Biochemistry.

    “Then the students go on a month break and resume in Sagamu for 400L (Pathology and Pharmacology).

    The thing is, right now, the people in 400L haven’t moved on to 500L, so there’s no vacancy in that class. They will move three months from now (June), considering the pace of their ongoing programme.

    “The truth is that this situation, although not normal, is not new. The best solution would have been to allow the class to resume after their one month break. Unlike in the past, individual classes are much smaller now (about 50 per class, though fees have sky-rocketed), so it would not really be much burden for the lecturers to cope.

    “In the past, there were single classes with populations above 200. But the Vice Chancellor is playing up the “Leave of Absence” phenomenon as a form of threat to parents so they will accept to pay extra fees/additional tuition.

    ” He claims that when students go on “Leave of Absence”, they don’t have to pay school fees, but that 300L class have paid for the current session (2012/2013) already and the next session 2013/2014 starts in June, which is when they will resume, so they will have to pay again.

    “The medical programme isn’t structured according to semesters. The programme is continuous and postings are counted in weeks, so there are hardly any breaks or holidays until after major exams. But the entire programme is structured to fit into six sessions.

    “The second major exam takes place in 400L (Part II MBBS exam). The third major exam takes place in 500L (Part III MBBS exam) while the fourth and final major exam takes place in 600L (Part IV MBBS exam).There are many smaller exams interspersed all through the programme of course, they are called in-course examinations.

    “Medical students pay school fees whenever their counterparts on the main campus are paying because the university management insists on it since the university operates a central payment portal. The portal opens for payment at the beginning of a session and closes after a time interval allowed for registration.

    “But everyone understands that the medical students’ final tuition is the sixth one. There is no controversy about this. It was the desperation to generate funds that made this new Vice Chancellor to consider exploring the possibility of asking medical students to pay school fees ad infinitum.”

    The Commissioner for Education, Science and Technology, Mr Segun Odubela, said the government was meeting with the students, lecturers and management with a view to finding solutions to matter.