Tag: Taofik Salako

  • ‘Nigeria has huge knowledge gap in estate planning’

    Mrs Mercy Edukugho-Aminah is the managing director of Meristem Trustees Limited, one of Nigeria’s trustee companies. In this interview with Capital Market Editor Taofik Salako, Edukugho-Aminah speaks on emerging issues in trusteeship, capital market and the economy.

    What does a corporate trustee firm do?

    As a trustee company, principally, we act as corporate trustee for corporate entities, public institutions and individuals. Ordinarily, an individual or corporate can decide that it wants to use someone who is familiar or they have a relationship with as Trustee for their assets. What the corporate trustee does is to now provide a specialized service, hence when you come to us, you are dealing with an institution, a regulated entity that has a corporate structure and enshrined corporate governance.

    However within the capital market, there are some transactions that require a trustee, such as bond issuance by corporate institutions and governments. In that instance, you have the law making it mandatory for you to use a corporate trustee and in that respect, you cannot use an individual or anybody that you like or any company you like, you have to go the regulated way. At that point in time you have to use a corporate trustee that is licensed by the appropriate authority. In Nigeria, you have the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that licenses trustees. Also, if you are doing a lending transaction, such as a syndicated loan, you ordinarily would have a security trustee.

    As trustees, there are times when the business transaction dictates the parties that you bring while at other times, it is the regulation that determines this. But in each of this, you will have a role for a corporate trustee.

    Now for individuals, because of peoples’ sad experiences with having to depend on relatives, legal associates, family friends and the like-there have been issues around biases coming to the fore, favouritism, issues around lack of confidentiality and accountability. This has made people more disposed to using corporate trustees. So readily, we are there to also provide for that market segment.

    How would you describe the operators and users of trust services?

    The trust business in Nigeria is relatively still at its infancy, especially when it comes to private trust. When speaking about trust services in general, you can segment it into private, corporate and public trust services.  Within the public trust, that’s probably where you have the states bond issuance while under corporate trust, you have instruments like mutual funds-that is funds managed by licensed funds and portfolio managers. Mutual funds are regulated under the purview of the SEC and must have a Trustee. The Investment and Securities Act (ISA) stipulates and regulates investments and securities business in Nigeria including transactions where Trustees are mandatory, hence I will say relatively we are average when it comes to the public trust business.

    However, within the corporate trust services as well as private trust space, you still have that knowledge gap of people who would ordinarily require our services but are not aware that they do. Accordingly, what you have is that most people are familiar with private banking and couple of years ago; let’s say about 10 years ago, that’s when you’ve a lot of people talking about private banking because it was an elitist thing. If you look at the history of where trust came from, how trust evolved, where the land owners had to use their property to get security, you will find how trustees have been the pillars of transactions and family business over the decades. In Nigeria generally, you’ll find out that the private trust business as well as the corporate trustee are relatively still at their infancy stage in terms of practice. In terms of the participants, you have mostly capital market firms wanting to have trust services subsidiaries as part of business expansion strategy.

    From a multi-stakeholders’ approach, what should operators do and what can the government do to drive the adoption of trusteeship from the corporate, private and public trust perspective?

    Sincerely, I’m probably not sure about government participation outside of capital market transactions, outside of bond issuances. As a group-the Association of Corporate Trustees (ACT), which is the self-regulatory organisation (SRO) for corporate trust businesses, I know that we are trying to get FMDQ and NASD- the two over-the-counter platforms to be able to see how we can include a role for trust companies in their transactions, especially when it comes to holding of security and perfection of security for the lenders and all that. When you talk about government, the preference would be for government to be an enabler, that is, to provide a level-playing field for everybody, as a market where you have professional dealings, where you will have your transactions executed the way you want it and within the ambits of the law. Government only needs to provide enabling and efficient systems that ensure that there are no sacred cows; that promote transparency and send the right perception out there about the capital market. Because really the image you want to put out there in the world about the capital market is an efficient, competent, professionally-driven, and value-driven market that is devoid of fraudulent and sharp practices. So generally, for the government they should help with projecting the capital market participants in the best light. With positive projection of the capital market, people will be ready to work with the parties, whether they are trustee companies, funds and portfolio managers, registrars, broker dealers and other capital market operators. That would definitely rub off on the trust business operators within the market.

    I know Nigerians always like government to be at the focus of what we do. But really, what the government should do is to make sure that if I am operating as a corporate trustee, I am not a fraudulent entity and those that make up my board are people of integrity. Check me, come and see what my processes are, check my governance structure and all that, and then allow me to market my services to individuals, corporates and the like. We might think that government regulations might benefit us in the short run but in the long run, people will start looking for different ways in which they can avoid those kinds of transactions. So the government should be the enabler, that is, make rules that ensure that there is transparency in the market. To a large extent, the government has done a lot. For example, if you want to do transactions within the public space, it’s highly regulated. You cannot say you want to go and collect money from the public as a capital market operator without a prospectus and approval. Generally you need to go through the legal way, the regulated way. So I wouldn’t say that government should have so many activities within the private space. We should allow the market to dictate its own pace and grow at its pace. But what government should do is to ensure that the professionals in that space do what is required under the law by adhering to professional ethics and standards.

    Are there advantages  trusteeship offer an individual or a corporate?

    The advantage of a trustee is that it opens up your business. Now, let’s take it from the corporate entity: it opens up your business to show everybody that you are transparent, you don’t have anything to hide and it allows for equitable execution of your transactions. So let’s take a case in point. You need N100 million for the expansion of your business, and the asset you have is valued at N500 million. Because you have a bank A that you have been doing business with over the years, they are available to give you the N100 million. Given the risk consideration and everything that the bank would do, the lender would say no problem we would give you the N100 million but at the end of the day, you are using a N500 million asset as collateral to collect N100 million. At the end of the day that bank transaction is over-collaterised.

    So what if you go into the expansion and you have all the shocks like we have had with foreign currency fluctuations recently and your business was affected and your earlier projections were not tenable. With the bank’s exposure to you, you also know that there is what is called single obligor limits and the bank will not go above that loan, but you are stuck. Imagine if you have given your N500 million asset to the bank, the bank will go and put title documents in its vaults and until you sort out your business with the bank, there is nothing you can do. But if you built a trustee into the transaction, what happen is that you give the asset to the trustee to hold as security trustee, he holds those asset, then the bank comes to sign up an agreement, a debenture deed to say that I am collecting N100 million, these are the terms and everything. If anything happens, you still have a N400 million head room with this same asset because it is not sitting in one bank’s vault. So you can use it to access more funds and you can even decide to go to bank B and refinance the previous loan. So trusteeship allows for a lot of business transactions to be done as against how it would ordinarily have been. There are a lot of benefits. You could do structuring around having a trustee to hold your assets for you for the benefit of multiple interests, multiple stakeholders. The interests of those stakeholders are protected because there is a trustee that is holding that asset not only for one person but for everybody.

    You also have that too with land or real estate transactions. Let’s take a land development transaction. You’ve somebody that owns the parcel of land but does not have the money to build, you now approached a private property developer that has the money or he is going to look for people he can readily collect money from. For the person that owns the land, you are definitely not going to give your title document to the developer. Now the developer will not like the title document to be in your pocket while he is pumping money into your land. So something needs to happen. What do you do? You call a trustee and say okay, trustee I am entering into this transaction, Mr Developer said he will do A, B and C, Let us write it down; this is what he will do. I, the land owner, have agreed that after he finishes developing and he gives me this portion of it, I would do deed of assignment for everybody that purchase and all that. So, Trustee will get all the documents sorted out, such that everybody is happy and nobody is feeling like if this man should die tomorrow what happens. So those are the ways in which you could use trust services. We keep telling people and we cannot overemphasis it, anywhere there are multiple interests over an asset, you need a trustee.

    The same applies to individuals; our history is replete with families, well-known names, that when the patriarch of the family is dead, the family is in disarray. The patriarch before he died probably did a Will but that would be contested until thy kingdom comes. Some of them as we speak are still in courts. Imagine if he had given those assets to a trustee, just like the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi did. He made a testamentary trust. He disposed off his assets as he pleased, however the executors of his estate were corporate trustees.

    Generally when it comes to estate planning, you should always plan for the unexpected. You need a trustee to help you in the distribution and management of your estate. It is very important. A trustee will help you to a very large extent to minimise those family crisis and issues. Once the assets are under the trustee vested with legal ownership over it, the law will take its course.

    How do you assess the level of awareness about estate planning generally in Nigeria?

    Estate planning is still a novel area in Nigeria. If you look at other climes like the UK, U.S. and other parts of the world, their estate planning structure and institution are very well defined, articulated and documented. However at Meristem, we align ourselves with best practices and policies as dictated by the Society for Trust and Estate Planning (STEP), which is a global body for trust and estate practitioners registered in the UK. We customise such global best practices and align them with Nigerian law and dynamics to make sure that what we are proposing to clients and how we are servicing clients are in line basically with extant regulations and global best practices.

    Specifically, as a service, there is still a huge knowledge gap in estate planning. Most people off hand will tell you I have a Will. But you and I know that having a Will is not the end. You have some who have Wills and yet, many years after, they are still awaiting the judgement of the courts on the Wills. Some people will purchase assets and say it belongs to me and my wife as Mr and Mrs but there is nothing in the law known as Mr and Mrs, the law does not recognise that. When purchasing assets as a couple, the full names must be clearly delineated. Whatever you own in your lifetime are your assets, such as, shares in companies, bonds, real estate, jewelleries, cash in the bank and others, all that make up your estate. The question is who do you want to get your assets when you are gone? How do you want them to be shared? When do you want them to take benefits of the assets? That is estate planning. There is also the issue of culture too and the way it affects estate planning. Around here people don’t usually want to talk about death. But death is one of the inevitable events that must happen in the life of a man. Designing and implementing an Estate plan using a Trustee does not mean that you are wishing death on yourself.

    As a company, how do you handle the problems of cultural bias and resistance?

    We have handled these basically through education and sensitisation. For existing clients that are doing one or two things with us already and are not really into estate settlement plan, we talk to them. For people that we don’t know we gather them up as a group and come to speak to them at their homes, offices or at leisure places. That is what we have been doing. We tell people it is not just about acquiring assets and all that. The same way you planned towards acquiring those assets, the same way you need to strategise on who gets what and the earlier you do it, the better because the earlier you start buying assets under a trust, you end up saving huge transfer cost should you decide to establish a trust over those assets.

    Do you have specific products for individuals?

    Our services are generic or bespoke trust business across corporate, public and private platforms. Under our private trust, our services includes estate planning, child education trust and nominee transaction-that is where you want to have somebody else who will marshal your arguments and make sure that whatever interest you are holding or assets is well protected and you are getting the best value. We also have a very unique service that we render in Meristem and that is the Meristem Diaspora Trust. Meristem Diaspora Trust (MDT) is aimed at ensuring that Nigerians in Diaspora execute their projects and investments in Nigeria successfully while still residing abroad. It includes all kind of transactions including financial investments, construction of buildings, acquiring of properties and advisory services on investment options among others. We have all heard one way or the other of cases where people say they sent money to their relatives or friends to build a house, the house did not materialise, sent money to someone to buy stocks for them, the shares were not available when requested, all those kind of cases around. If you live and work in the Diaspora and you need a trusted partner, you can come to Meristem Trustees.

    With Meristem Diaspora Trust, everyone is a winner. When the people in the Diaspora have more confidence that their remittances will be used as required, there will be more inflow of remittances and the country will be better for it. Nigerians in the Diaspora are toiling hard to build their futures, hence they can also be rest assured in certainty of coming home to their investments and in the longer term, they will be in better position to support themselves and their relatives, make meaningful contributions to their society. Under Meristem Diaspora Trust, all transactions are backed with a Trust Deed, you can monitor your investment and there are flexible exit options in case of decision to withdraw. We also have alternative education plan for parents known as Meristem Kiddies Assured Trust (M-KAT). It is not an insurance product but a trust product that guarantees uninterrupted education for the beneficiaries. Unlike an insurance product where interruption can occur due to legal transfer process or probate administration, M-KAT is based on a Trust Deed that spells out the rights, obligations and other modalities for seamless management of the trust. The fund is managed professionally and the return on investment is usually reinvested to form part of the principal that is payable to the specified beneficiary.

    How affordable are these services that you render?

    They are very affordable. For us as a firm, our philosophy is built around values; we are a value-driven firm. Across a group, Meristem generally is value-driven. So whatever we do, we are always asking ourselves: are we adding value to the client?  Let me make an example. If you say you want to set up a trust fund for your child today and you put N10 million to the trust fund, how will you feel if I tell you my fee of one per cent will be from that your N10 million? Meanwhile your child is about 10 years old. So let’s assume that you are saving towards his university education, at least the first few years, how will you feel if I tell you that between now and termination of the Trust Fund I will be earning as fee one per cent every month? How much will you have at the end of the day?  So would you do business with me?  The answer is no. But what we do is that once you put funds in a trust fund, In the Trust Deed we have stipulations of where we can invest funds from trust assets. In addition, we have the Trustees Investment Act that dictates the kind of investments that trust assets can be put into. And those are guaranteed and securitised investments like treasury bills and bonds among others. We make sure that the asset is protected. So what we do is at the end of the day, taking into cognisance the regulation, it is only what we can add to the N10 million that we take our fee from. So that N10 million should be able to yield a certain amount of returns. That is just an analogy to tell you how we operate, how flexible we are.

    As a group, how do you ensure that the independence of the trustee is not compromised in any way as to affect the fidelity of its transaction?

    That’s a very interesting question and that takes me back to the duties and responsibilities of a trustee. Now for you to say you are a trustee, it is not by saying it, it is the fact that you act within the ambits of the law: you are a fiduciary. So irrespective of whatever consideration you have, at the foremost of your mind, would be your role as an impartial judge; our role is to serve as protector; our role solely is to ensure that nobody suffers a loss around the transaction. We are not going to say because we are related to this party or related to that party or we have the same board, to jettison our duties and responsibilities as trustee because it is a fiduciary position. We must make sure we render account of trust assets; we must make sure we do not enrich ourselves with trust assets. We must make sure that trust assets are not co-mingled where the clients would not be able to distinguish its assets from ours. We must make sure that whatever the dictates of the trust deeds and agreement reached by the parties are, they must be upheld. Trusteeship as a concept on its own, has over the centuries defined what your roles are, what your obligations are, what your powers are and what Trustee duties are. So really that concept of trusteeship is sacrosanct. So you are not just a trustee by mouth, at any point in time you are a trustee in deed and actions. And that has evolved over centuries.

    Within the Nigerian space, as a trustee, we have the code of conduct by the SEC, if you go and check the code, you will see all the things that trustees should do and all the things that you should refrain from doing already stipulated. So if you add that to the timeless principles of trusteeship given the origin of trusteeship, if you are going to be a professional, you must align yourself. So that’s the best way. So at any point in time your fidelity must not be compromised. And if it means you shouldn’t do the transaction because you would be compromised, then really you should walk away. Also, you also have instances where the SEC would say if you have a capital market firm that is a party in a transaction and you also have a trusteeship firm, the two of the firms cannot be on the same transaction, or where you have the same board managed by the same holding company, you cannot pitch or do this transaction. This is aimed at guiding against conflict of interest.

    One major statutory requirement for bond issue whether as corporate, private or public is having a trustee. Now we have had instances where bonds being raised, especially by governments, are suspected to have been mismanaged. What can be done to guide against such incidences and to protect the interest of the common citizens?

    Yes, the interest of the citizens is very important because what such public bond issuance is usually meant for is to build infrastructure and that must be done. Because, once a bond is issued, you now have Irrevocable Standing Payment Order (ISPO) and at the end of the day, the money from the state is being deducted to pay back the bond. Like you said, we have had one or two issues around that. The role of the trustee is actually, at that point in time, is to ensure that those projects are being undertaken and it is not somebody putting up phantom projects. The bond issuer itself has an obligation to make sure that those infrastructural projects are put in place. As a trustee, we can only go and monitor. But for those public bonds at the end of the day, the onus goes back to the issuer. Trustees would try to sit between ensuring two things: the person that has invested in good faith should be able to get his investment back, that is why you have the ISPOs, and the people who should benefit from the infrastructure should have the infrastructure, the issuer should be responsible enough to make sure that asset or infrastructure is provided for the people. We also handle such roles but the problem is that these monies are not disbursed by the Trustees.

    Doesn’t the law give a trustee the power such that if there is fraud in the system it can actually take up the parties that are involved?

    It can. At that point in time what you can do is to notify the regulator that these are your findings. That while you are aware that this bond issuance was for this and that project, this is your finding with regards to project execution and utilisation. These bonds issuance are cleared by the SEC, the apex capital market regulator and we render returns to it. We just perform our role of making sure that investors are protected and they get their returns. The other thing that we are proposing given the experiences we have had is to hold the assets and the money and disburse it ourselves according to project milestones. This will give trustees greater powers to monitor fund utilisation and project execution and help to checkmate abuse. With this, the proceeds of the bond issue will not be subject of political transition and the citizenry will be rest assured that irrespective of the government in power, the project will be delivered as projected. Because irrespective of the government in power, the ISPO will automatically deduct funds from the government and by extension the funds belonging to the general citizenry.

    As a capital market operator, mutual funds are some of the things that drive the market. What can be done to encourage savings and investments and how can Nigerians see the benefit in mutual funds?

    As to what we can do as operators in the market, we must make sure we operate a market that is transparent, a market that is professionally driven, and peopled by professionals with integrity. Once you have a market that is transparent, a market that is professionally-driven, the market will have integrity, a market where you have zero conflict of interest, you put in place measures and practices that guarantee that my interest is not at risk. Once you have a market that is like that you can be rest assured that overtime the market would speak for itself. Now, on getting the Nigerian populace to come into this market, you have to go by way of more sensitisation. We have had some good examples but most time you find out that some negative experiences we have had tend to discourage people, so we need to keep projecting the market in a positive light. If we keep projecting it, peoples’ confidence in the market would be sustained.

  • Capital market… ’capital’ penalty

    Capital market… ’capital’ penalty

    Last week’s indictment and expulsion of Managing Director of Partnership Investment Company Plc and Partnership Securities Limited, Mr Victor Ogiemwonyi, has opened up the capital market to public scrutiny, writes Capital Market Editor Taofik Salako.

    Suave, knowledgeable and amiable, Victor Ogiemwonyi was unmistakably one of the leading lights of the capital market. His knowledge about the capital market is vast and he rises almost spontaneously to defend the market interest.

    A fellow and former council member of the Chartered Institute of Stockbrokers (CIS), former council member of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), former president of the Association of Issuing Houses of Nigeria (AIHN), member of the Capital Market Masterplan Implementation Committee and member of the board of the NASD Plc among others, Ogiemwonyi was one of the leaders of the market during his time. His company-Partnership Investment Company Plc was one of the few stockbroking-originated investment companies that were listed on the NASD Plc-the alternative over-the-counter (OTC) securities exchange for listing of public limited liability companies that are not listed on the NSE. All these came crashing last week with the announcement of his indictment by the Administrative Proceedings Committee (APC) – the adjudicatory arm of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

     

    Long-awaited rulings

     

    After more than a year of wide-ranging investigation, SEC last week indicted Ogiemwonyi, banning him from engaging in capital market activities and from holding directorship position in any public company in Nigeria. SEC also withdrew the operating licenses of his companies. The commission also suspended the chairman of the companies, Mr. Henry Omoragbon, from engaging in capital market activities in Nigeria for five years.

    Ogiemwonyi and his companies allegedly engaged in unauthorised sale of clients’ shares, failure and refusal to resolve clients’ complaints, performance of a capital market function without registration, non-compliance with the Code of Corporate Governance of the commission, filing of false and misleading information and non-compliance with the commission’s rules relating to assets-mix ratio.

    They were also accused of non-compliance with the commission’s rules on disclosure of transactions valued at N50 million and above executed in a single day, soliciting deposits from the public and other violations of the Investments and Securities Act, 2007, SEC Rules and Regulations, the Code of Conduct for Capital Market Operators and their Employees and Code of Corporate Governance for Public Companies.

    Ogiemwonyi was also ordered to pay a penalty of N100, 000 for breach of Rule 1(iii) of the Code of Conduct for Capital Market Operators and their Employees as contained in the SEC Rules and Regulations made pursuant to the Investments and Securities Act 2007. Omoragbon was also ordered to pay a penalty of N100, 000 for breach of Rule 1(iii) of the Code of Conduct for Capital Market Operators and their Employees as contained in the SEC Rules and Regulations made pursuant to the Investments and Securities Act 2007.

    Some Directors of the company, Mr. Ojetunde Taiwo, Mrs. Ogiemwonyi Olufunke, Mr. Ogiamien Frank, Mr. Adeusi Aladejola Alexander and Mrs Arese Ugwu, were also suspended for five years from engaging in capital market activities. They were also banned from holding directorship positions in any public company in Nigeria for the period of five years and were ordered to pay a penalty of N100, 000 each for breach of Rule 1(iii) of the Code of Conduct for Capital Market Operators and their Employees as contained in the SEC Rules and Regulations made pursuant to the Investments and Securities Act 2007.

    Also, Mr. Eseha Augustine Enejeta, a manager in the company, was suspended for a period of one year from engaging in capital market activities. He was also ordered to pay a penalty of N100, 000 for breach of Rule 1(iii) of the Code of Conduct for Capital Market Operators and their Employees as contained in the SEC Rules and Regulations made pursuant to the Investments and Securities Act 2007.

    The commission also ordered Partnership Securities to restore to Mr Cletus Mbaji Uchendu 48,200 shares of Forte Oil Plc, which were allegedly sold without the client’s authority. The order for restoration also included all accrued benefits to the client such as bonuses and dividends from May 23, 1997 to date.

     

    Road to infamy

     

    The composition of the APC was sequel to several complaints filed by investors against Ogiemwonyi and his companies. Some 300 investors alleged that they were swindled of more than N4.8 billion in investment schemes promoted by Partnership Securities Limited (PSL). Representatives of the investors alleged that they were approached by Ogiemwonyi to surrender their shares to him for management under his Partnership Securities Deposit Account (PSDA) with a promise to provide a guaranteed return periodically. Shares worth more than N4.8 billion were misappropriated through this scheme.

    SEC and NSE in the last quarter of 2016 conducted joint investigations into the activities of PSL. Preliminary investigations by the capital market regulators said the authorities had established a case of illegal activities against Partnership Securities as the operation of the scheme and guaranteed returns ran contrary to the mandate of the securities firm. Guaranteed investment scheme is prohibited by the Rules of the Exchange, and violation under this rule may fall under engaging in illegal activities and transactions. Such violations carry wide-ranging fines and sanctions under the rules of the market, including monetary sanction, revocation of dealership license and cancellation of stockbroking license.

    One of the highpoints of the cases involved the former chief executive of Ecobank Transnational Incorporated (ETI) Plc, Mr Arnold Ekpe, an ally and client of Ogiemwonyi. Ekpe mandated his stockbroking firm, Partnership Securities Limited, to sell his 96.08 million ordinary shares of ETI. Ogiemwonyi allegedly sold the shares but only remitted N300 million of the total proceeds of N1.54 billion to Ekpe. Ekpe, in a complaint lodged at the Exchange dated October 16, 2016, alleged that PSL misappropriated N1.237 billion being part of the proceeds of sale of Ekpe’s 96.08 million shares of Ecobank Transnational Incorporated Plc and dividends of $80,000. Ekpe also alleged that although he completed a form indicating that the proceeds of the share sales should be paid into his bank account under the Direct Cash Settlement system, PSL elected to pay the proceeds into its own account and misappropriated the funds.

    The Exchange on October 18, last year suspended PSL from trading on all its floors nationwide. The Exchange also on October 19, last year informed SEC of the complaint and requested for a joint examination of PSL and its associated companies. SEC as early as first quarter of 2016 started conducting silent investigation on PSL. SEC already saw a clear-cut case against Ogiemwonyi. In a February 2016 letter, SEC noted that available documents indicted PSL and that the broker-dealer was liable and would be held responsible for the defalcation of illegal conversion of sales’ proceeds.

    The Ekpe case against Ogiemwonyi appeared iron cast and he allegedly admitted culpability. “Further to our mandate to sell your 96,077,872 shares of Ecobank Transnational Incorporated at the fixed price of N16 per share, we confirm that the shares were sold by us for a total of N1.537 billion out of which N300, 000,000 has been paid to you. We confirm that outstanding proceeds from the sale have been misappropriated by us and we undertake to meet the obligation of N1.237 billion and $80, 000,”   Ogiemwonyi stated in one of the documents tendered.

    SEC took advantage of the existing agreements between the capital market regulators and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to lodge a direct complaint with the anti-corruption agency. EFCC conducted preliminary investigation and arraigned Ogiemwonyi before the High Court of Lagos for sundry offences, including stealing and dishonest conversion of proceeds of share sale. Ogiemwonyi was ordered remanded in Ikoyi prisons.

    The Ekpe case appeared to blow the lid off the can of iniquities at Ogiemwonyi’s companies. Other investors appeared with allegations of fraud and mismanagement. Some of the other victims included Mr.  Godwin  Anono,   Chairman, Standard  Shareholders Association of Nigeria, who claimed N160  million worth of shares,  Mr. Alabi Olusola  with over N12.540 million worth of shares and Mr. Solesi Samuel with over N40 million worth of shares among others.

    Olusola said Ogiemwonyi called him to deposit his shares, which had not been traded over the years, in the custody of his stockbroking firm to manage those shares and generate 10 per cent returns, which would be paid to Alabi twice a year.

    “When I look at the proposal, it was reasonable and the man involved is a prominent council member of the NSE. I trusted him.  I did not enter the deal with an unregistered operator and it was not that he offered me a fantastic return, but a reasonable return.  The deal was such that I can back out at any time I wish. When in 2014 the returns were not forth coming, Ogiemwonyi started giving one excuse or the other; that the returns are being reinvested; it was then I realised that he was playing foul, hence  I demanded for my shares which could not be returned to me,” Alabi said.

    After excruciating investigation, the Head of Enforcement Department at SEC lodged complaint at the APC, which invited all respondents to submit their claims. In the matter, the respondents included Partnership Investment Company, 1st respondent; Partnership Securities Limited, 2nd respondent; Mr. Henry Omoragbon, 3rd respondent; Mr. Victor Ogiemwonyi, 4th respondent; Mr. Allan Omorogba, 5th respondent; Mr. Ojetunde Taiwo, 6th respondent; Mrs. Ogiemwonyi Olufunke, 7th respondent; Mr. Ogiamien Frank, 8th respondent; Mr. Adeusi Aladejola Alexander, 9th respondent; Mr. Eseha Augustine Enejeta, 10th respondent; Mr. Odihi-Ogiemien Frank, 11th respondent; Dr. Bello Aliyu Gusau, 12th respondent; Mr. Olafisika Akinkugbe, 13th respondent; Mrs Arese Ugwu, 14th respondent; Mrs. Yinka Omoragbe, 15th respondent; Mr. Justus Olu Paul, 16th respondent; Mr. Clem Baiye, 17th respondent and Mr. S.C. Irune, 18th respondent. The APC concluded that “by their actions and or omissions the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, and 14th respondents engaged in acts capable of adversely affecting the investing public’s image of, and confidence in the capital market”.

     

    No sacred cow

     

    The latest indictments reechoed the tough stance of capital market regulators on fraudulent practices, especially unauthorised sale of client’s shares and misappropriation of client’s funds. SEC and the NSE as well as the CIS have been combative when it comes to infringement on market integrity. With some N13 trillion equities listed on the NSE and the almost limitless capacity of the primary market to raise funds, the market thrives on integrity and all stakeholders are usually unanimous on this. So, when the hammer falls, there is usually no comradeship and sacred cow. In another high-profile case, SEC had earlier this year banned ebullient investment banker, Mr. Albert Okumagba and Mr. Chibundu Edozie and their companies, BGL Assets Management Limited and BGL Securities Limited from ever participating in the capital market. Okumagba and Edozie were also banned for life from holding office in any public company in Nigeria. Okumagba was also a force to reckon with in the capital market, having served at the top echelon of the organs including as president of the CIS.

    Okumagba’s case was however quite different, because it involved no unauthorised sale or diversion of client’s funds but rested on equally dangerous terrain of asset management. Even though a client or an investor can willingly sign on to an investment management agreement, the onus rests on the capital market operator to ensure that the investment agreement is in line with capital market rules and the operator’s registered function. That was the Achilles heel of BGL-one of Nigeria’s most robust investment banking firms.

    SEC had received 32 complaints between 2012 and 2015 against the BGL companies over certain conducts in relation to operations of their Guaranteed Consolidated Notes (GCN) and Guaranteed Premium Notes (GPN).

    SEC had, through the EFCC, pursued and secured conviction of a stockbroker and former managing director of First Alstate Securities Limited, Mr Tajudeen Folaji, who was sentenced to seven years imprisonment by the Lagos State High Court over fraudulent sale of his client’s shares. The Lagos State High Court presided over by Justice Kudirat Jose found Folaji guilty of unauthorised sale of shares and stealing for fraudulently converting 31,886,200 shares of IPWA Plc  valued at N331.3 million belonging to an investor on April 3, 2008. The court also has imposed a N20 million fine on First Alstate Securities Limited where he was the managing director and dealing clerk. Besides, the court directed the EFCC to trace and liquidate properties belonging to the convict to restitute the investor.

    The NSE has this year expelled not less than 88 stockbroking.  The expulsion also implies that the expelled firms will not be able to act as stockbroking agent in other countries that have Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Nigerian capital market authorities.  Nigerian capital market has standing bilateral agreements with several other jurisdictions including Morocco, Angola, China, Ghana, Kenya, Malaysia, Mauritius, South Africa, Tanzania and Uganda.

    President, Association of Issuing Houses of Nigeria (AIHN), Mr. Sonnie Ayere has called for a pragmatic approach to address the problem of illiquidity by reviewing the practice rules and scope of operations of stockbroking firms to make them more viable and profitable.

    Ayere, who is also Managing Director of Dunn Loren Merrifield Group, cited the example of Malaysia that reformed the stockbroking ecosystem with the introduction of universal brokers, which were allowed to access the interbank market to undertake borrowing or lending of funds.

    Many stockbroking firms and stockbrokers have been found to be carrying out transactions at the equities market without adequate funding of their accounts, thus exacerbating settlement risks at the market.

     

    A pact for investor’s protection

     

    While few untoward cases like Ogiemwonyi’s highlighted market risks, a cursory review undoubtedly shows that the Nigerian capital market has comprehensive internal and external frameworks to safeguard investors and market integrity. While subsisting MoUs with not less than 10 other countries grant Nigerian capital market regulator international leverage to checkmate domestic illegalities, SEC and NSE have subsisting cooperation agreement with the EFCC that enables the capital market regulators to pursue further enforcement of regulatory actions. While the ISA empowered SEC protect investors, it has limitations over criminal cases. The agreement with the EFCC covers the loopholes.

    Director General, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Mr. Mounir Gwarzo, said key initiatives such as recapitalization of operators, direct cash settlement, e-dividend, national investors protection fund (NIPF), and code of corporate governance among others would help to strengthen investor’s protection and block loopholes.

    Chief Executive Officer, Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), Mr Oscar Onyema, said authorities at the Exchange have implemented far-reaching transformational programmes that have improved market access and provided products that are aligned to investors’ requirements. He added that the introduction of several transparency initiatives such as BrokerTrax, X-Compliance, X-Whistle, Compliance Status Indicator symbols, X-Issuer and X- Alert among others have brought significant sanity to the market place and provided for a fair and orderly market.

    Managing Director, Solid-Rock Securities and Investment Plc and President of the Association of Stockbroking Houses of Nigeria (ASHON), Mr. Patrick Ezeagu told The Nation that the involvement of some capital operators in illegal activities was an exception rather than the norm.

    “In any association or group, there is bound to be few bad eggs and the actions or activities of these few do not criminalise the entire members. We have, in conjunction with the regulators, put in place a robust compliant management framework to ensure the quick resolution of complaints in the market. We have zero tolerance to infractions and if you check very well, you will see that the rate of infraction is probably the lowest in the capital market. There are many structures put in place to safeguard investors and their investments,” Ezeagu said.

    President, Chartered Institute of Stockbrokers (CIS), Mr Oluwaseyi Abe said investor protection would always remain a topmost priority for the regulators and operators in the capital market. He said the CIS would continue to collaborate with the regulators to ensure that stockbrokers keep to the dictum: “My word is my bond”.

  • What future returns for Sterling Bank?

    With a full year return of 71.29 per cent in 2012, twice the rate of average return in the Nigerian capital market during the period, Sterling Bank opens today with a year-to-date return of 52 per cent. This is some 19 percentage points above average market return of 333.13 per cent. One of the 30 best-performing stocks in the market for the first half, Sterling Bank ranks within the best-performing stocks in recent years. But intrinsic fundamentals still suggest the bank has stronger upside potential, Taofik Salako reports.

     

    In the past 18 months, equity investors have all smiles. Nigerian equities recorded average return of 35.4 per cent in 2012. The full-year return in 2012 implied accretion of some N2.44 trillion in capital gains to investors during the 12-month period. The market opens today with a year-to-date average return of 32.94 per cent. Average market return is denoted by the All Share Index (ASI) of the Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE), a value-based index that tracks all equities on the Exchange. Besides its primary importance as benchmark for the NSE, ASI doubles as the country index and relates average value at the stock market.

    All through, Sterling Bank has remained substantially above market average. Its share price appreciated by 71.29 per cent in 2012, pushing through opening price of N1.01 and a low of 80 kobo to close at N1.73. At the opening price of N2.63 per share, the current market consideration implies a year-to-date return of 52 per cent. This represents one of the highest returns in the banking sector. The performance of Sterling Bank is further highlighted by the fact that lenders generally are running behind the market with the NSE Banking Index opening today with a year-to-date return of 23.77 per cent.

    For long-term investors and speculative traders, Sterling Bank presents substantial returns. For traders who had anticipated the pricing trend and the opportunity that might come with additional allotment through the ongoing rights issue, they have a lump-sum three-in-one return. Besides the capital gains of 52 per cent in the past 28 weeks and the dividend yield of 11.6 per cent, the pre-allotted shares now offer additional return of 24.1 per cent, given the rights issue price of N2.12 per share, the market price and opportunity for trading of rights on the NSE. With inflation rate at 9.0 per cent and Monetary Policy Rate (MPR) of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), which sets the benchmark for lending rate at 12 per cent; investment in the bank’s shares still presents substantial net return, even when adjusted for inflation and cost of capital. Such returns, such as Sterling Bank’s, are what have kept foreign portfolio investments scrambling into the Nigerian capital market, in spite of obvious macroeconomic and political challenges.

    For shareholders and long-term investors, Sterling Bank appears more like the proverbial golden hen that lays to meet the current needs and still subsists for future needs. While continuous improvements in fundamental performance and returns have seen quantum leap in shareholders’ value, such as the capital gains in the past 18 months and 100 per cent increase in last dividend payout, steady implementation of the bank’s medium-to-long-term growth strategy reinforces the sustainability of such growth and return.

     

    Symmetrical values

    Sterling Bank’s technical performance at the stock market appears to be rooted in similar performance in the fundamentals of its business operations. This is the norm for share pricing. While the arguments subsist on the time-lag and immediacy of stock market pricing efficiency, there is conclusive unanimity on the fact that share price trend will tend to reflect the fundamentals of the stock overtime. The differing nature of efficiency response time- depending on the nature of the market, investors, technologies etc, is what makes for overvaluation, undervaluation and fair value of each stock and the entire market sometimes. These are the underlying variables for continuous stock market corrections and cycles. It is within these cycles and corrections-within stocks and markets; that speculative investors make money from. For long-term investors and shareholders, the intrinsic value lies in the ability of the stock to create and sustain substantial values over the cycles and corrections. This appears to be attraction of Sterling Bank.

    Audited and interim earnings reports have shown appreciable growths over the years, underlining the consistency of the bank’s fundamentals in its transition from a small-size low-tier bank to an expansive mid-tier bank. Audited report and accounts of Sterling Bank Plc for the year ended December 31, 2012 showed that gross earnings rose by 44 per cent from N47.7 billion to N68.86 billion. Profit before tax, on the face of it, rose by 33 per cent from N5.46 billion to N7.5 billion. When adjusted for the sale of subsidiaries in previous year, pre-tax profit from core operations actually doubled from N3.6 billion to N7.5 billion. Also, while tax write-backs of N1.3 billion had boosted net profit to N6.91 billion, the bank paid taxes of N546.11 million for 2012 and still increased net profit after tax to N6.95 billion. With earnings per share at 44.3 kobo, the bank doubled cash dividend from 10 kobo paid for 2011 business year to 20 kobo for 2012. The sustainable dividend outlook was still appreciable with dividend cover of 2.22 times in 2012. At the opening price for this year, the dividend per share implied a dividend yield of 11.6 per cent, one of the highest in the market.

    Besides, the audited report had shown continuing disciplined growth in business expansion and credit risks management. Both the structure and quality of risk assets improved considerably during the year. While gross loans and advances grew by 38 per cent from N171.47 billion to N236.13 billion, classified loans dropped by about 29 per cent from N9.4 billion to N6.7 billion. The proportion of non-performing loans to total loans and advances thus halved from 5.5 per cent in 2011 to 2.8 per cent in 2012, significantly surpassing industry’s benchmark target of 5.0 per cent.

    The current earnings report shows increasingly positive outlook. Interim report and accounts for the three-month period ended March 31, 2013 showed that profit after tax rose by 96 per cent while profit before tax increased by 85 per cent. In three months, gross earnings stood at N19.84 billion as against N16.21 billion recorded in comparable period of 2012. Profit before tax jumped from N1.63 billion to N3.02 billion while profit after tax leapt to N2.72 billion as against N1.39 billion. The report underlined continuous improvement in the bank’s cost efficiency and growing market share. Pre-tax profit margin was 15.2 per cent in first quarter 2013 as against 10.1 per cent in comparable period of 2012. Deposits increased by 13.1 per cent within the three months from N466.85 billion recorded in December 2012 to N528.10 billion in March 2013. Total assets grew by 11 per cent to N645.07 billion as against N580.23 billion recorded in December 2012.

     

    Better than average

    Sterling Bank’s first quarter net profit growth signaled robust returns outlook for investors as earnings per share rose by 89 per cent from 9.0 kobo recorded in first quarter 2012 to 17 kobo in first quarter 2013. This places the bank within the top three banks with the probable earnings yield. While actual dividend payout and related dividend yield depends on the board of directors’ recommendation and approval of the shareholders at the general meeting, earnings yield is the fundamental basis for dividend payout and intrinsic value-creating potential of a stock. Earnings and dividend yields relate a company’s fundamental earnings to its share price within a specified period. Both however, depend on the entry cost of the investor. At current market consideration, Sterling Bank’s earnings-potential return outlook outweighs most stocks in the banking subsector. The lender opens today with earnings yield of 6.5 per cent. Against the discounted rights issue’s price of N2.12, the bank’s earnings yield trended upward to 8.0 per cent. Average earnings yield in the banking subsector is about 5.0 per cent. Only six banks rank above average with Unity Bank and Sterling Bank posting the highest yields. Unity Bank opens with a yield of 8.6 per cent. Zenith Bank carries a yield of 3.6 per cent. Ecobank transnational Incorporated (ETI) opens with a yield of 3.3 per cent while Stanbic IBTC Holdings opens with the lowest yield of 2.1 per cent, based on available earnings reports.

     

    Strengthening growth base

    In spite of the above-average upside potential, Sterling Bank is looking to strengthen its competitiveness and fundamental performance through additional capital. Riding on the back of successful integration of the acquired Equitorial Trust Bank (ETB) Limited, the emergent Sterling Bank seeks to consolidate its nationwide spread and operations with injection of new equity and debt capital. According to the new capital issue agenda, the bank plans to raise $80 million through rights issue and $120 million through private placement.

    Sterling Bank is currently raising N12.5 billion through a rights issue of about 5.889 billion ordinary shares of 50 kobo each at N2.12 per share, 30.5 per cent discount to this year’s high of N3.05 at the stock market. The shares have been pre-allotted on the basis of three new ordinary shares of 50 kobo each for every eight ordinary shares of 50 kobo each held as at May 20, 2013. Application list, which opened on June 24, 2013, will run till July 31, 2013.

    The rights circular indicated that the net proceeds of the rights issue, estimated at N12.13 billion, would be used mainly to finance branch expansion and increase working capital. Part of the net proceeds would also be used for infrastructure upgrade in support of automated and cashless payment as well as to enhance information technology.

    According to the breakdown of utilization of net proceeds, 35 per cent of the net proceeds, estimated at N4.24 billion, would be used for branch expansion; 15 per cent of the funds estimated at N1.82 billion would be used for infrastructure upgrade, 10 per cent of the funds equivalent to N1.21 billion for information technology and the largest chunk of 40 per cent, estimated at N4.85 billion, is billed to be set aside as additional working capital.

     

    Shareholders’ support

    Early filings from receiving agents and expressions of interests by several key stakeholders showed enthusiastic start for the rights issue. The success of the rights issue is primarily assured by the commitments of major shareholders. While four core investors hold about 35 per cent equity stake, 193 shareholders altogether hold the decisive 83.1 per cent equity stake. The supports from non-core shareholders have further strengthened the prospects for the rights issue, which had earlier received firm commitments from major Nigerian and foreign shareholders including the State Bank of India, Dr. Mike Adenuga, Suleiman Adegunwa’s Ess-ay Investments Limited and others. Sterling Bank’s non-core shareholders, with less than five per cent equity stake, include a large number of minority retail shareholders of more than 88,000. Most of the shareholders’ groups that represent small-holding retail investors have publicly expressed supports for the rights issue. These included Sir Sunny Nwosu’s National Coordinator, Independent Shareholders Association of Nigeria (ISAN); Dr Faruk Umar’s Advancement of Rights of Nigerian Shareholders (AARNS); Boniface Okezie’s Progressive Shareholders Association of Nigeria (PSAN); Gbenga Idowu’s Shareholders United Front (SUF); and Mrs. Bisi Bakare’s Pragmatic Shareholders Association.

     

    A window to the future

    Managing director, Sterling Bank Plc, Mr. Yemi Adeola, said the ongoing rights issue and other capital raising exercises were meant to support the bank’s next growth agenda, which is aimed at consolidating its stable performance over the years and enhance its competitiveness in terms of size and resilience to macroeconomic changes. According to him, additional capitalisation has become necessary because size has become increasingly important and relevant in the banking industry and the extent of capital base could be a limit to expansion in terms of physical presence and operations.

    He pointed out that additional working capital would enable the bank to expand the scope of its corporate banking business, noting that the bank is currently limited by the single obligor limit, which is a function of available capital base.

    “If with the modest capital that we have, we were able to stabilise the bank, deliver consistently better returns to shareholders and build up to become the a top tier bank. Imagine what we would do with more capital. Our shareholders have no reason whatsoever not to be excited in participating in the rights issue. You can’t regret it,” Adeola had assured.

    Four-year forecasts for the bank showed continuous growths in the top-line and bottom-line over the next four years. Profit forecasts reviewed by capital market regulators and professional parties showed that gross earnings will rise steadily from N87.22 billion in 2013 to N115.23 billion, N147.2 billion and N188.82 billion in 2014, 2015 and 2016 respectively. Profit after tax is expected to grow by about 71 per cent to N12 billion in 2013 and thereafter to N15.1 billion, N22.28 billion and N35.19 billion in 2014, 2015 and 2016 respectively. While it will plough back the larger chunk of retained earnings into reserves, cash dividend is expected to increase from N2.4 billion in 2013 to N3 billion in 2014 and thereafter to N4.46 billion and N7.04 billion in 2015 and 2016 respectively.

    Farsightedness, stable management, long-term strategic corporate plan and corporate goodwill are mitigating factors against country and industry risks of policy summersaults, corporate governance issues and heterogeneous external and domestic changes that tend to reshape the Nigerian financial services industry. In all these, Sterling Bank appears to be in better stead.

     

  • Cadbury Nigeria: Improving performance

    Cadbury Nigeria Plc rode on the back of appreciable increase in sales and cost efficiency to improve its bottom-line performance significantly. While it had leveraged on cost efficiency to drive performance in the last audited report, the company benefited from substantial growth in sales and improved cost efficiency in the first quarter of this year.

    Earnings report for the first quarter ended March 31, 2013 showed that turnover rose by 16 per cent while profit growth scaled up through the ranks from 43 per cent for gross profit to 185 per cent each for pre and post tax profits. The bottom-line performance was boosted by 29 per cent reduction in finance expenses.

    Total sales stood at N8.36 billion in first quarter 2013 as against N7.2 billion in comparable period of 2012. Gross profit rose from N2.27 billion to N3.25 billion. Profit before tax leapt to N1.68 billion as against N587.1 million in corresponding period of 2012. Profit after tax stood at N1.41 billion compared with N400.7 million in comparable period of 2012. With this, earnings per share tripled to 36 kobo as against 13 kobo in previous year. Underlying profitability ratios showed considerable improvements in the profit-making capacity of the company. Gross profit margin increased from 31.5 per cent to 38.9 per cent while pre-tax profit margin jumped from 8.2 per cent to 20.1 per cent.

    Audited report and accounts of the company for the year ended December 31, 2012 had shown marginal decline in sales, but improved cost and financing management squeezed out more profit than the previous year. Although tax provisions impinged on net earnings, underlying profitability ratios generally showed stronger performance.

    The company’s balance sheet indicated better financing and liquidity positions, which supported the overall performance outlook. With lower gearing ratio, improved liquidity, higher working capital and increased proportionate contribution of equity funds to total assets, amenable balance sheet structure moderated midline constraints that could have resulted from the lull in sales.

     

    Financing structure

    Cadbury Nigeria’s underlying financing structure improved slightly in 2012. The proportion of equity funds to total assets inched up to 50 per cent in 2012 as against 49 per cent in 2011. Debt-to-equity ratio improved from 9.0 per cent to 7.5 per cent. However, current liabilities/total assets ratio stood at 42 per cent in 2012 as against 41 per cent in 2011. Long-term liabilities/total assets closed 2012 at 8.0 per cent as against 9.5 per cent in 2011.

    Total assets had increased by 19 per cent to N40.16 billion in 2012 as against N33.66 billion in 2011. Non-current assets had increased marginally from N13.43 billion to N13.99 billion while current assets rose by 29 per cent from N20.23 billion to N26.17 billion. On the other hand, total liabilities rose by 18 per cent from N17.07 billion to N20.12 billion. While long-term liabilities steadied at about N3.2 billion, current liabilities increased by 22 per cent from N13.88 billion to N16.91 billion. The company’s paid up share capital remained unchanged at about N1.57 billion, consisting of about 3.13 billion ordinary shares of 50 kobo each. With about 55 per cent of net earnings flowed into the reserves, shareholders’ funds improved by 21 per cent to N20.04 billion compared with N16.59 billion recorded in the previous year.

     

    Efficiency

    Overall outlook appeared to suggest steady productivity and cost efficiency in 2012. Total cost of business, excluding financing charges, stood at 88.4 per cent of total sales in 2012, almost flat with 88.0 per cent recorded in 2011. Finance expenses had dropped by 29 per cent from N41.95 million to N29.89 million.

     

    Profitability

    Cadbury Nigeria recorded a mixed-grill in 2012. While the lull in sales constrained opportunity for wider profit growth, the company fell on cost and finance management to mitigate decline and steady the bottom-line. These played out variously in the outward profit and loss items and the underlying profitability ratios. While sales, gross profit and trading profit dipped to lower levels, gross profit margin and pre-tax profit margin showed improved cost efficiency and profitability.

    Gross profit margin inched up to 33.1 per cent in 2012 as against 32.7 per cent in 2011. Profit before tax margin also improved modestly from 14.8 per cent to 16.4 per cent. Both indices indicated that the company witnessed improvement in average profit per unit of sales, in spite of the decline in actual figures.

    Total sales dropped marginally by 1.6 per cent from N34.11 billion to N33.55 billion. Cost of sales also slumped to N22.45 billion from N22.95 billion. Gross profit flattened to N11.10 billion in 2012 as against 11.16 billion in 2011. Total operating expenses stood at N7.21 billion, some 1.8 per cent above N7.08 billion recorded in 2011. Trading profit thus dropped from N4.08 billion to N3.89 billion. With 67 per cent increase in non-core business income from N971 million to N1.62 billion, profit before tax rose to N5.51 billion in 2012 compared with N5.05 billion in 2011. However, increase in tax provisions reversed net profit after tax by 5.9 per cent to N3.46 billion as against N3.67 billion in previous year.

    Per share analysis indicated earnings per share of N1.10 in 2012, a slight decrease from N1.17 recorded in 2012. The company distributed some 45 per cent of net earnings as cash dividends to shareholders. Gross dividend of N1.57 billion was distributed on the basis of 50 kobo per every ordinary share of 50 kobo each. Net assets per share also increased by 21 per cent from N5.30 to N6.40. The dividend cover of 2.20 times also represents substantial future payment potential. Underlying returns were however, generally lower. Return on total assets dropped from 15 per cent to 13.7 per cent while return on equity slipped from 22.1 per cent to 17.2 per cent.

     

    Liquidity

    The liquidity position of the company improved considerably during the period. Current ratio, which indicates the potential ability of the company to meet emerging liabilities, strengthened to 1.55 times in 2012 compared with 1.46 times in 2011. The proportion of working capital to sales also improved from 18.6 per cent to 27.6 per cent. Debtors/creditors ratio stood at 42.5 per cent as against 43.3 per cent.

     

    Governance and structures

    Cadbury Nigeria Plc was incorporated in January 1965 and became a publicly quoted company in 1976. Mondelçz International, a global snacks company, holds the majority equity stake of 74.99 per cent in Cadbury Nigeria while thousands of Nigerian individual and institutional shareholders hold the remaining 25.01 per cent. Mondelçz International has operations in 165 countries with total revenue of $35 billion in 2012. Mondelçz is listed in the Standard and Poor’s 500, NASDAQ 100 and Dow Jones Sustainability Index. The board and management of the company remained stable. Mr Atedo Peterside still chairs the board. Mr Emil Moskofian replaced Mr Alan Palmer as the managing director. Cadbury Nigeria complied with codes of corporate governance and best practices during the review period.

     

    Analyst’s opinion

    The performance of Cadbury Nigeria in the first quarter and the audited report show continuing improvement in the operating fundamentals of the company. With a relatively strong balance sheet, streamlined business that focused on optimal return and recent horizontal and vertical integrations, the company has shown considerable potential for growth. The recent absorption of its subsidiary-Stanmark Cocoa Processing Company Limited and continuing integration of Cadbury Nigeria as the hub for Mondelez International’s African operations are expected to be catalysts for significant growths in the years ahead.