Tag: tariff

  • MAN, LCCI express concern over new electricity tariff

    MAN, LCCI express concern over new electricity tariff

    The Organised Private Sector (OPS), including the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN) and the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI), has expressed concerns over the new electricity tariff planned to begin on February 1 as supply has not improved and the pending court order.

    The President, Manufacturers Association of Nigeria (MAN), Dr Frank Jacobs, said the body is waiting to see whether the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) would disregard court order by going ahead to implement the new tariff in February. He said any attempt to implement the tariff would force some manufacturers out of business.

    He said: “It is not all the manufacturers that can set up a power plant. Many are using power from the grid for production together with generators. Do you know how much the 45 per cent increase in tariff translates to in naira in a week, month, quarterly, and yearly? It is a lot of money, and I do not think the sector can cope with this,” he added

    Jacobs said the situation is appalling, as many operators have been forced out of business in the last 10 years, due to inadequate power supply.

    Director-General, Lagos LCCI, Mr. Muda Yusuf, said the new tariff would worsen the condition of the operators of the OPS in the country, if urgent measures are not taken to address problems bedevilling the power sector.

    He said despite the removal of fixed charges in December, last year, by the commission, consumers are still groaning under huge cost of accessing electricity for production activities.

    Also some corporate and individual consumers are not oblivious of the fact that they will face difficulties meeting their energy obligations as from February this year. Already, consumers are groaning over what they described as ‘making frivolous payment’ in form of bills to the power distribution companies (DISCOs) since they are unable to access power regularly.

    Some consumers, who spoke to The Nation, expressed concerns over the new tariff, that have been increased by 45 per cent, by the commission, to reflect the cost of producing electricity in the country.

    A lawyer,  Mrs. Ponle Oluwarotimi, said consumers are heading for a more challenging period, going by the  decision of NERC to implement the new tariff, albeit, disregarding the order of the House of Representatives stopping NERC from introducing and implementing its tariff.

    She said the country is experiencing poor power supply, coupled with the fact that the economy is bad. “For the Commission to justify the 45 per cent increase in tariff, there must be an improved power supply in Nigeria. Given the fact that the sector is in a dire strait, with no hope of improving soon, consumers must be ready to pay huge bills, while at the same time, experience poor power supply,’’ she said.

    She said the situation is unhealthy for the economy that is struggling to grow.

  • Tariff without representation

    Tariff without representation

    It is now incumbent on Fashola to ensure improved power supply, having made Nigerians cough up more for it

    Come February 1, electricity consumers in the country will have to cough up more money in line with the approval given for increases in tariffs granted the Electricity Distribution Companies (DISCOs) by the Federal Government.

    With the new tariff structure, residential consumers (R2) will pay on the average 48 per cent more than what they are currently paying. Consumers under the Abuja Electricity Distribution Company who are paying N19.96 as energy charge currently will pay N29.56, representing an increase of 48.1 per cent; those under the Eko Disco will now pay N28.75 instead of N18.75, representing 53.3 per cent increase.

    Those under Ikeja, Kaduna and Benin Discos, who are paying N14.96, N20.66 and N18.46 for a unit of electricity, will from February 1 pay N22.96, N31.71, and N27.72, respectively. These represent 53.5 per cent, 53.5 per cent and 49.62 per cent rise for the three Discos, respectively. Commercial consumers (C2) under the Ibadan and Enugu Discos, who are paying N26.79 and N29.05 for a unit of energy, will from February 1 pay N38.87 and N42.4, respectively. These represent 45.1 per cent and 45.9 per cent increase in the respective rates.

    Asking consumers to pay more for goods or services would ordinarily not be an issue in view of the many vicissitudes that the country’s economy has witnessed in recent times. One is here talking about the crash of the naira and all that. But we know that market forces work in mysterious ways in Nigeria. In the days of the defunct National Electric Power Authority (NEPA) and its successor, the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN), electricity tariffs were fixed arbitrarily. What consumers paid was a function of so many things, including whether the meter reader liked your face or not; and this is also a function of how far you could go in greasing their palms. If you were not the ‘hospitable’ type, you were at the mercy of the meter reader who slammed you with whatever amount he liked. They called it crazy or estimated bill. The meter reader had no business reading your meter. Indeed, some of them would tell those of us who could confront them that they had revenue targets (but not power supply targets) that they must meet, else they would be in trouble themselves.

    To show the absurdity in that era, I will cite one or two personal examples. The first was an occasion when, from Good Friday of a particular year our light did not blink for 21 consecutive days. Yet, when the then NEPA people brought their bill, I was asked to pay the usual amount that had been ‘gazetted’ into their system in my name. There was another occasion that a ‘molue’ fell one electricity pole in my area, which was a stone’s throw from the NEPA undertaking there leading to power disruption for nine straight days. I was still slammed the usual estimated bill. This, largely, was what the present owners of the Discos inherited and it seems quite okay by them. It was only after the reality dawned on them that the former President Goodluck Jonathan is out that they also realised that an abrupt end had to come for their disco party. The truth is that because of the unearned money that these companies are making from hapless Nigerian consumers, they are not in a hurry to let go of the ancien regime of tariff. They had thought that the music would continue, with former President Jonathan in control.

    Normally, increased tariff should translate to improved efficiency. That is, other things being equal. But Nigeria is a peculiar country. Other things can never be equal in a situation where there are about four broad categories of electricity consumers and not all of them are paying for electricity. The first are those consumers whose meters are in good condition; the second are those with meters that are faulty; the third are those consumers without meters but the power firms are aware of and therefore give them some form of bills monthly. The fourth category is those that are not on the power firms’ records because they tapped electricity illegally. One would naturally assume that those with working meters would have their meters read. This is wrong assumption because many meter readers back then (and even now) as I said never read meters; they already had their minds on what to bill consumers. Only a few of them did and still do their work conscientiously.

    Now, if meter readers are not under compulsion to read even meters that are working, why would they want to listen to those with faulty meters, begging that the meters be replaced so they can have a fair idea of electricity they consume? If a meter is not working, does the solution lie in guesswork? The power firms simply ignore demands for meters that are not in good condition because the idea is not necessarily to bill consumers for what they consume but to make money off the consumers, even if illegally. As for the category of those that the power firms know are connected to the national grid but do not have meters, what they pay is either determined arbitrarily as ever from the offices or the meter reader uses his discretion to determine their bills, depending on their ‘standing’ with him.

    So, for me, where to start is not necessarily in raising tariffs. This is putting the cart before the horse. The first thing is for each Disco to have a proper enumeration of its customers, bringing into the net those who had tapped electricity illegally. As things stand, they cannot in all conscience say they have done that. And until this is done, some other people would continue to subsidise the electricity consumed by such people.

    It is going to be easy to make people who entered into a business genuinely to make profit to shape up. But not so for companies that never thought the days of impunity of the Jonathan era would end so suddenly. Quote me, they would soon start asking for another tariff review unless they first change their business module, and then bring in people who are using electricity illegally because they can never recoup their money the way things are, not to talk of make profit. It was former President Olusegun Obasanjo who should have asked the then NEPA how it did it, when in the early years of his administration NEPA said it had succeeded in raising revenue from less than N2billion monthly to about N6billion at a time power supply had ebbed considerably.

    If you are wondering where I got my headline from, it was graciously supplied by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) boss, Sam Amadi, when he told reporters the process through which the new tariff structure passed before it was approved. “We have gone to the Discos, gotten feedback, gone to government and gotten feedback”. So, where did they put the electricity consumers in all of these? I know the Discos themselves had tried to carry consumers along but failed because no rational thinking electricity consumer would make himself available for suicide by agreeing with them on tariff increase, given the numerous failed promises in the past on electricity supply.

    When announcing the (then) impending tariff hike, the MInister of Power, Works and Housing, Babatunde Raji Fashola had appealed for understanding from electricity consumers. To the extent that Nigerians are not protesting the new order, at least not loudly, it can be taken that they have accepted his plea for understanding, but it is incumbent on the minister to extract efficiency from the power firms. Otherwise, he would have succeeded in allowing Discos that never prepared to do business in the kind of environment they now find themselves to further con hapless Nigerians. Worse, he would have succeeded in also eroding the goodwill on the crest of which President Muhammadu Buhari rode to power.

    Lest I forget, the minister also made the usual comparison between the electricity sector and the telecoms sector to buttress his point about the advantage of privatisation. I disagree. They are two different things. If as a consumer I am dissatisfied with a particular telecoms provider, I can switch to another even without losing my number. I mean I can simply port. It is not so with the electricity sector where consumers are inexorably tied to the DISCO in their area.

  • Eko Disco lauds NERC over new electricity tariff

    The Eko Electricity Distribution Company (EKDC) on Thursday commended the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) on the new tariff regime.

    Mr Godwin Idemudia, the Corporate Communications Manager in EKDC, gave the commendation in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos.

    He was reacting to the removal of fixed charges under the new tariff regime introduced recently by the NERC.

    According to him, removal of fixed charges by government is a welcome development which will benefit the customers a great deal.

    Idemudia said that his company would now redouble its efforts on its metering project.

    He said that the company had the least charges among the operators going by what NERC had just released.

    “What it means now is that we are going to pursue vigorously our metering rollout plans to meet the yearnings of customers.

    “But for those who cannot wait for the rollout plan to get to them, they can key into our Credited Advanced Payment Metering Implementation (CAPMI) programme to avoid estimated bills which do not favour the company nor the customers.”

    Idemudia said that his company’s recent arrangement with Egbin for supply of 100 mega watts was still in place.

    “Customers within Lekki, Ajah, Ibeju and environs will benefit greatly from this special plan.

    “This is energy that will come directly to us without passing through the national grid.

    “In this special arrangement, the customers will pay slightly more than regular customers.

    “The good news is that it would be stable almost at all times,” Idemudia explained.

    He said that the company had put in place special fault clearing teams to respond to faults during the Christmas and New Year period for faults to be attended to within a very short time of distress calls.

    “Our equipment have been serviced to take any amount of energy that may be wheeled to us by the generation companies via transmission.

    “While we wish our our customers the very best this season, we appeal to them to pay their bills regularly and also make use of our customer care helplines whenever they need our services.

    NAN recalls that the NERC, on Dec 21, outlined various rates of increase in energy charges for consumers across the country.

    It announced the removal of fixed charges for all classes of electricity consumers so that power users would only pay for what they consumed.

    Fixed charge is that component of the tariff that commits electricity consumers to paying an approved amount of money not minding whether electricity is consumed during the billing period.

    Under the new arrangement, residential customer classification (R2) in Abuja Electricity Distribution Company will no longer pay N702 fixed charge every month.

    Their energy charge will, however, increase by N9.60.

    Also, residential customers (R2 customers) in Eko and Ikeja Electricity Distribution zones will no longer pay the N750 fixed charge.

    They will, however, be paying additional N10 and N8, respectively, in their energy charges.

  • NLC rejects electricity tariff hike

    • Pushes for free pre-paid meters

    The Central Working Committee of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has rejected the 45 per cent upward review of electricity tariff in the country by power firms.

    It said pre-paid meters must be given to electricity consumers freely.

    The congress also rejected the planned re-introduction of toll gates on federal high ways across the country. It said proceeds from the toll gates in the past were never put to judicious use but were used to“line the pockets of some individuals.”

    In a communique issued at the end of its emergency meeting in Abuja, Congress said increasing electricity tariff at this point in time with the challenges in the economy, which have drastically reduced the purchasing power of ordinary Nigerians and slowed down businesses, including manufacturing, is not justifiable.

    It said electricity distribution companies (DisCos) have continued to exploit customers through estimated billing systems, while deliberately refusing to make pre-paid meters available.

    The communique which was signed by its President and General Secretary, Comrade Ayuba Wabba and Dr. Peter Ozo-Eson respectively noted that: “It is clear therefore that the 45 per cent tariff increase is an additional heavy burden on consumers and will have a telling effect on business especially, manufacturing.”

    The Congress rejected  government’s plan to re-introduce toll gates on the highways and roads. It recalled  “the enormous public resources expended in the past on the construction and demolition of toll gates; CWC observed that the proceeds from toll collection were never effectively deployed for the maintenance of roads, but lined the pockets of collectors.”

    It further said it was convinced that proceeds from any new toll collections will suffer the same fate, CWC disagrees with the planned re-introduction of toll gates.

    On the issue of the N18,000 minimum wage, the Congress said: “There have been discordant tunes from state governors on the issue of the national minimum wage.  “Whereas, at one moment, they deny that there are plans to reduce the minimum wage, at another moment, they threaten to sack workers or reduce the minimum wage.

    “The national minimum wage of N18,000 has been rendered valueless by the mindless devaluation of the naira and  rising inflation;  moreover, it is legally due for a review.

  • NERC’s planned electricity tariff hike aborted

    NERC’s planned electricity tariff hike aborted

    The House of Representatives has halted the planned increase in electricity tariff by the Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission, (NERC) pending the completion of its committee’s investigation of some stakeholders in the sector.

    In a December 15 letter addressed to NERC, the Hon. Babajimi Benson headed House Ad-hoc Committee investigating the activities of Electricity Distribution Companies (DisCos) told NERC to abide by the directives in a previous letter it wrote urging it to suspend the review of electricity tariffs in the country.

    The letter, signed by Benson, reads:  “In paragraph 3  of our letter dated 29th October, 2015 under the same subject heading, we requested you to suspend the implementation of any increase in electricity tariff until the committee concludes its investigations.

    “Further recall that at the joint investigative hearing with the Committee on Power, it was agreed that any tariff increase should be suspended until all stakeholders are carried along.

    “Our attention has been drawn to various news items published in many newspapers of yesterday December  13,  2015 to the effect that your commission has concluded plans to announce  new electricity tariff to Nigerians this week.

    “It is our opinion that any plan by your commission to announce new electricity tariff will run contrary to the spirit of the letter under reference and undermine the outcome of the investigative hearing by this Committee as it relates to infrastructure and billing by Electricity Distribution Companies.

    “We hereby once again, demand that you suspend the announcement and/or implementation of any increase in electricity tariff until (the) above stated issues are concluded.”

    The Committee through the letter, reminded NERC of its request for the list of Ministries, Department and Agencies (MDAs) indebted to the DisCos, adding that the Commission should forwards the list of DisCos to it to enable it conclude its investigation.

    The Reps Committee’s position on the planned tariff hike stemmed from the revelation by the NERC chairman, Sam Amadi during a recent hearing that DisCos over-bill customers and charge flat rates for consumers without meters.

  • Court  halts NERC’s bid  to  increase  tariff

    Court halts NERC’s bid to increase tariff

    The Federal High Court in Lagos has adjourned a suit by activist-lawyer Mr Toluwani Adebiyi to February 11 and 15 next year.

    The court had restrained NERC from increasing tariff following an ex-parte application by Adebiyi.

    The lawyer sought an injunction to stop the commission from raising tariff without steady power for 18 hours a day.

    When the case came up before Justice Mohammed Idris, NERC and the Distribution Companies (DISCOs) informed the court about their pending applications objecting to the suit.

    Adebiyi, who said the applications were devices to delay the hearing, sought time to respond.

    The order, the lawyer said, is still subsisting, warning that NERC cannot increase tariff this year until the suit is determined.

    Adebiyi said Form 48 is already prepared for whoever dares the court by increasing tariff when the order has not been discharged.

    The lawyer had initiated contempt proceedings against NERC chairman Dr Sam Amadi over his claim that judges were frustrating reform in the electricity sector, but the judge later urged the plaintiff to withdraw it.

  • TUC vows to resist electricity tariff hike

    TUC vows to resist electricity tariff hike

    The Trade Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC) has described the proposed increase in electricity tariff by the electricity distribution companies (DisCos) as an invitation to anarchy.

    It warned that organised labour would resist the move, which it described as oppressive, indefensible and retrogressive.

    In a statement issued on Monday by its President, Bobboi Bala Kaigama and Secretary General, Musa Lawal, TUC said the proposed tariff increase  by an average of 49.4 per cent is wrong and lacked human face.

    He said:“There is no gainsaying the fact that the present billing system is crazy, and any increase in tariff at this time is bound to make it even crazier. Why should the masses be at the receiving end of every wrong and retrogressive policy in the country? Why must they always pay for what the rich consume more of?  What sense does it make for a man who earns less than N20, 000 per month to be made to pay over N8, 000 for electricity bill alone within the same month?”

    He  wondered why people should pay so much for what they do not use regularly enough, with officials of the DisCos rarely bothering to read the analogue metres. “Why should these questionable issues that are spared no thought in other climes always take centre stage in Nigeria?” He asked rhetorically, insisting that Nigerians deserve a much better deal.

    TUC said the proposed increase could explains why the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has been foot-dragging on the issue of making prepaid meters  available to consumers of electricity so as to sustain excessive billing being imposed on the consumers.

    He said: “NERC is considering introducing measures that will facilitate reduction of the rate of the fixed charge on consumers. What has been happening all along is same with what is obtainable in the telecommunications sector. They either assign tones to subscribers or enrol them on plans that attract daily, weekly or monthly deductions. We say no to this. The N750 charge is fundamentally fraudulent and unjust and must be abolished. Anyone canvassing its sustenance or any increase in tariff does a grave disservice to the nation.”

    The TUC said NERC and the DisCos would do well to shun anything that would attract the wrath of the masses. He said  rather than a hike in electricity tariff, Nigerians expected the power firms to earnestly adopt genuine consumer-friendly policies.

    It harped that the fact that power supply is relatively improved within the last few months does not mean that the myriad of challenges bedevilling the sector are over.

  • TUC vows to resist electricity tariff hike

    The Trade Union Congress of Nigeria (TUC) has described the proposed increase in electricity tariff by the electricity distribution companies (DisCos) as an invitation to anarchy.

    It warned that organised labour would resist the move, adding that it is totally oppressive, indefensible and retrogressive.

    In a statement issued on Monday by its President, Bobboi Bala Kaigama and Secretary General, Musa Lawal, TUC said the proposed tariff increase  by an average of 49.4 per cent is wrong and lacked human face.

    He said:“There is no gainsaying the fact that the present billing system is crazy, and any increase in tariff at this time is bound to make it even crazier. Why should the masses be at the receiving end of every wrong and retrogressive policy in the country? Why must they always pay for what the rich consume more of?  What sense does it make for a man who earns less than N20, 000 per month to be made to pay over N8, 000 for electricity bill alone within the same month?”

    He  wondered why people should pay so much for what they do not use regularly enough, with officials of the DisCos rarely bothering to read the analogue metres. “Why should these questionable issues that are spared no thought in other climes always take centre stage in Nigeria?” He asked rhetorically, insisting that Nigerians deserve a much better deal.

    TUC said the proposed increase could explains why the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has been foot-dragging on the issue of making prepaid meters  available to consumers of electricity so as to sustain excessive billing being imposed on the consumers.

    He said: “NERC is considering introducing measures that will facilitate reduction of the rate of the fixed charge on consumers. What has been happening all along is same with what is obtainable in the telecommunications sector. They either assign tones to subscribers or enrol them on plans that attract daily, weekly or monthly deductions. We say no to this. The N750 charge is fundamentally fraudulent and unjust and must be abolished. Anyone canvassing its sustenance or any increase in tariff does a grave disservice to the nation.”

    The TUC said NERC and the DisCos would do well to shun anything that would attract the wrath of the masses. He said  rather than a hike in electricity tariff, Nigerians expected the power firms to earnestly adopt genuine consumer-friendly policies.

    It harped that the fact that power supply is relatively improved within the last few months does not mean that the myriad of challenges bedevilling the sector are over.

  • New electricity tariff coming in November, says NERC

    New electricity tariff coming in November, says NERC

    new electricity tariff will come into force before November 15, the Chief Executive Officer, Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), Dr Sam Amadi said yesterday.

    The Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN), human rights groups, and other consumers are opposed to a  hike in electricity tariffs. But NERC has fixed between October 30 and November 12 for the implementation of new electricity tariff.

    Amadi said there were on-going efforts to have a cost effective tariffs in Nigeria, adding that the tariffs would be implemented latest November 12.

    Amadi, who was a special guest on a national television programme monitored by our correspondent in Lagos, said the new tariffs are not going to be uniform, since there are various classes of electricity consumers in the country.

    He said some power distribution companies (DISCOs) will slightly increase their tariffs by between 20 per cent and 30 per cent, while others would impose more than 40 per cent tariffs on their customers.

    He said: ‘’ From what the DISCOs have submitted to the Commission, there are ranges of tariffs for consumers of electricity. In few DISCOs, consumers would see slight increase in tariffs of between 20 per cent and 30 per cent, while it would be higher let say 40 per cent thereabout (in others).  The charging of tariffs would be based on the cost profile of the DISCOs, the number of customers available to them and the quantity of power available to them.”

    He said the new tariffs are going to reflect the true position of things in the power sector, given the fact that the power firms are bedevilled with financial problem.

    ‘’We are introducing new electricity tariffs in November 2015 in order to capture the realities that the DISCOs are bringing to the sector.  The realities include debts owed the DISCOs; the increase in the price of gas and  rising cost of financing infrastructure used by both the power distribution and generation companies. “We are not changing the scientific methodology of fixing electricity tariffs, but we are introducing new tariffs to capture the realities on ground in order to ensure operational efficiency in the industry,’’ Dr. Amadi added.

    According to him, the country needs to generate 20,000 megawatts (Mw) of electricity before power can be stabilised.

    ‘’Conservatively, 20,000 Mw of electricity is needed to have stable electricity in Nigeria. The reason why the country needs 20,000 Mw of electricity is because not everybody in Nigeria is connected to the national grid. For instance, Dangote Group is off-grid, so also are other companies that we cannot include them in the 20,000Mw estimate,’’ he said.

  • Why electricity tariff must be hiked

    Why electricity tariff must be hiked

    The issue of hiking electricity tariff in the country has elicited mixed reactions. While power firms say it is necessary for them to recover cost, consumers say the industry must attain a level of stability before tariff hike. The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Governor, Godwin Emefiele, says Nigerians must be prepared to pay more for electricity. Emefiele who was head, Nigerian delegation to the International Monetary Fund/the World Bank Group meetings in Lima, Peru, says the country is not sliding to into recession. He says Nigeria came out of the meetings with a road map on the way forward, including adopting economic diversification and stricter foreign exchange controls, Group Business Editor, SIMEON EBULU, was there.

    How would you describe proceedings at this International Monetary Fund (IMF)/World Bank meetings

    Aside from the World Bank and IMF meetings that we had, we also held several side meetings with some potential foreign investors who have shown tremendous interest in Nigeria; we held meetings with some international banks, who are seeking to develop their relationship with Nigeria, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) as well as the Federal Ministry of Finance. We also held meetings with some rating agencies  to provide insight into the economy and what we are doing to support and grow the economy.

    Basically, what we can say as the main issue is that the world finance leaders as well as the governors of central banks, came to the conclusion, to the point where the global growth was further revised downward.

    When the Spring meetings were held in April, global growth was projected at 3.8 per cent, but at this meeting, the growth was revised downward to 3.1 per cent. For African economies in April when we held the meeting, global growth was projected at over five per cent, but at this meeting, global growth for 2015 has been revised downward at 3.75 per cent, and in fact for next year,  growth for Africa  has been projected at about 4.25 per cent.

    What is the implication of this downward trend?

    What this tells us is that the slowdown, as a result of the drop in commodity prices, or the end of the quantitative easing (to the extent that the United States (U.S) is already contemplating raising rates through sale of assets), as well as the geo-political tensions, have affected very many economies to the extent that they are slowing down, and in some cases, some of the economies have also gone into recession.

    What is the way forward?

    The meetings concentrated on what can be done to reverse the trend and what kind of specific options and solutions that can be provided for the different economies in order to turn their situations around. Basically, for those economies that are really affected by drop in commodities prices, and in this case Nigeria, the basic solutions and suggestions that came up were that first, there is a need for us to diversify our economy away from oil and commodity prices.

    We are already doing that, and we use this opportunity to thank Mr. President for the various interventions he has made in support of our various efforts to diversify the economy away from oil, or away from commodities’ prices. That gives credence to what we are doing in our various attempts to catalyse the economy, by making intervention funds available to support agriculture, Micro Small and Medium Enterprises, and other various interventions that we have put in place to support the growth of the economy.

    Another solution that came up, was that countries that are affected by commodity prices and other external shocks should adopt country-specific options that they think would help in addressing their problems. That gives credence to the specific options that we have taken regarding our decision, not to continue to adopt an indeterminate depreciation of the naira. So, we will continue to monitor the situation (as I have always said), and to ensure that we refocus our mind, and everything we do, to the extent that we see what we can do to continue to conserve our reserves  and achieve some level of stability in the exchange rate.

    What are the high points of the African caucus meetings with the  IMF/WBG?

    There were some specific meetings in the African caucus,  which is the Group of Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors  from Africa, which was held specifically with the Managing Director of the IMF, Mrs. Christine Lagarde and President of the World Bank, Dr. Jim Kim.

    At that meeting, the African caucus used the opportunity to raise five key issues; one, we discussed how the World Bank and IMF can assist African countries  in enhancing financing for sustainable development.  These should help the African countries on how they can raise finance and how they can receive support from the IMF and the World Bank to ensure that by 2030, extreme poverty would have been eradicated.

    The African governors and the IMF also discussed how the world financial bodies could assist African countries in stemming illicit financial flows so as to reduce, or eliminate the incidence of loss of revenues and taxes from African countries.

    The African caucus also discussed how the World Bank and IMF could assist African countries in achieving their economic transformation and diversification project,   so as to reduce the adverse impact of the drop in commodity prices on their economy.

    The caucus also discussed how the World Bank and IMF, could assist in financing regional transformative infrastructure projects. And indeed even on this, we even held our side meetings with the World Bank Team (which was headed by Nigeria’s Ms. Arunma Oteh). We had very constructive engagements with her, and the IMF have made a commitment that they will assist Nigeria in whatever form, in raising or sourcing finance for some of our infrastructure projects.

    Fifth, the governors and finance ministers, also discussed how the IMF will assist African countries in reducing diversity, quotas and other problems that may appear. Here, we’re talking about increased representation of Africans, both in the World Bank and IMF. At the specific meetings that we held with the World Bank, the President, Dr. Jim Kim, specifically mentioned the fact that three notable Africans, one of which included our own Ms. Oteh, were appointed as Executive Vice Presidents, to support the attempt by the World Bank to ensure that Africans have representation in the World Bank. But of course at the IMF, we also canvassed the need for and to press further, that more Africans are represented at the senior and board levels of the IMF, and we received commitment at the IMF that this will be done.

    What level of success has been recorded in the nation’s reform efforts so far?

    Yes, in Nigeria, we have been adopting reforms and this started about two years ago, or much earlier. The prime issue from the fiscal side, has been the fact that we have tried to expand our tax-base so as to improve on revenue. You will all recall that last year, the Federal Ministry of Finance engaged with McKinsey, and within the period, McKinsey raised almost N75billion as incremental revenue. And this year, they have been given the target to raise it to a minimum of N150 billion, as a way of raising our revenue base so as to begin to see how we can shore up our revenue and rely less on oil.

    CBN’s denial of access of foreign exchange to some items has been construed as a ban?

    Let me repeat that we did not ban the importation of any item; what we just did was to exclude (them) from accessing foreign exchange. These are items we think can be produced in this country. In fact, in the past, these items have been produced in the country in large quantity, and we think that because of the challenges we have, following the drop in commodity prices and the drop in revenue accruing to the nation, we felt there is a need for us to begin to produce those items in the country. That position still stands.

    I must have been quoted out of context if anybody said I am reconsidering that position. What I only said is, the exclusion stands, and I have even mentioned in different fora, list of different items which should even be excluded, which some manufacturing companies think can be produced within the country, but we have said no, that we need to properly digest these 41 items that have been excluded from foreign exchange.

    The basic issue is this; there is a slowdown. It is a fact that revenue has dropped as a result of the fall in commodity prices. If that has happened, we need to prioritise, just like Mr. President has said. We need to prioritise to make sure that foreign exchange is made available only to those who are importing essential raw materials and products we know cannot be produced within the country. That is the only way we can conserve our foreign exchange and reduce the demand for foreign exchange for the importation of some of these products we are saying can be produced in the country.  And we will continue to plead and crave everybody’s indulgence,  give us the support, as we are convinced that these items can be produced here in this country.

    I have read and heard from people, saying the Central Bank is preventing people from getting foreign exchange. Let me also say that the Central Bank’s role is to intervene in the foreign exchange market, and we have tried as much as possible the broadening of the foreign exchange base, so that those who earn foreign exchange through export proceeds  can also make their funds available in the market for everybody to share.

    So, from time to time, we will continue to do our best to provide foreign exchange in the market, to meet the import needs of our people, but what is important, is for us to understand that there are challenges facing practically all the countries in the world. There are only just few countries that we can say are insulated for now, but even at that, they, including the US, know that they have to be careful in whatever contagious action they take, otherwise, it will also affect them.

    So, we need everybody’s cooperation to ensure we meet those targets, we need to refocus our minds and think of the best way to diversify our economy, away from excessive reliance on oil.

    How true is it that investors are exiting our markets?

    It is true that investors are pulling out their investments in the country. And I must tell you that in the third quarter of this year alone, I read in a report that almost $48billion were capital outflows that left Emerging and Frontier markets.

    So, what does that mean?

    It means that people are pulling funds and are beginning to look at economies, such as the U. S. and other areas where they think there are opportunities, and there are fears that the drop in commodity prices will ultimately affect economies that depend solely on commodity exports.  And  that is why we are saying, it is time for us to think as nationalistic Nigerians; that we have to carry our cross by ourselves; we have to solve our problems by ourselves; nobody is going to solve our problems for us. That is why we will continue to appeal to all of us, to embrace and support the measures and policies that we are putting in place, because all these are meant to see how we can diversify our economy away from excessive reliance on oil.

    Whatever support that is needed, the Central Bank and the Deposit Money Banks, are willing to give those support, and I can assure you that in the course of time, even interest rate will begin to come down, and our people will begin to enjoy the benefits of the actions that we have put in place to diversify our economy.

    What is your take on the push for electricity tariff hike?

    When you talk about inflation and exchange rate as being the model for pricing tariff and all that, you are very correct. And that is why we are doing our best to see to it that we keep inflation under check, and that is why we have been (I use the word stubborn) in even adjusting the currency further, and you will notice that in the last eight months, we have achieved so relative stability in exchange rate, and that will continue. But I also read in the papers that we are not going to continue to enjoy the tariffs that we have seen so far.

    For you to have good electricity supply, you need to pay a little more, and the truth is that, if we compare the cost of generating our own electricity using our generators, with the cost of using the existing distribution companies’ grid, you will find out that what we spend on generators is significantly higher than the cost/kilowatt hour, using the DISCOS. For example, using your generator costs as much as N80/kilowatt hour, and today, using your DISCOs, you are paying less than N20/kilowatt hour in some of the cases.

    What we are saying, is, even if you have to pay a little more so that you can throw away your generator, pay a little more so that you can have more electricity, and I think it is worth it. These are some of the policies that the NERC is putting in place to support what is called the Cost Reflective Tariff. But I can assure everybody that whatever that cost reflective tariff turns out to be, it will still be substantially lower than the N80/kilowatt hour spent today on our generators.

    To what extent has CBN intervention to DISCOs and GENCOs galvanised the power sector?

    We have seen some improvement in power generation and it is also true that the wheeling capacity in the transmission grid, is limited. I am also aware that we’ve been in discussion with government about efforts being made to encourage investment in the transmission grid, so as to improve the capacity of the transmission to be able to absorb more energy that is generated so that more power can get to our people.

    We will continue to do so and in the course of time, the actions that are being taken by government to improve the transmission capacity, will be unveiled to all of us and will agree that actions are being taken.

    The funds were provided to distribution and generating companies, as well as gas firms, but not all of those funds have been disbursed, because of the issues that we are trying to resolve with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, as well as the Nigerian Electricity Bulk Commission. Once those issues are resolved, more of those funds will be disbursed and then we can start to talk about the impact. Yes, those DISCOS are supposed to use the money to buy meters, transformers, and so on so as to improve their capacity, while the GENCOS are required to use the funds to acquire equipment, replace some of their obsolete equipment so that they can also improve on their generation capacity.

    We’ve started to see the impact of this positively, by the time the remaining funds are disbursed, it will help to improve the distribution and generation capacities, that is why I told you earlier that government, realising that the transmission capacity may be hindered, is already taking steps on how to invest in transmission, so as to improve capacity in that area.

    Is Nigeria sliding into recession?

    Let me quickly correct that, Nigeria is not sliding into recession. We have had two quarters of slow growth. Like I told you, even the world economy has revised its growth outlook.  So, what we are saying is that, because we have seen two successive quarters of slow growth, that we should embrace the policies that we are putting in place both at the monetary and fiscal fronts, so that we can see a reversal and increased growth, not slowing growth, so no one has talked about Nigeria going into a recession. It means we need to work hard to reverse the trend  so we can move to positive growth, rather than slowing growth.