Tag: tax reforms

  • Tax Reforms: How Nigerians earn more through PAYE reductions, net pay up, taxes down

    Tax Reforms: How Nigerians earn more through PAYE reductions, net pay up, taxes down

    • By Arabinrin Aderonke 

    Nigeria’s new tax laws are no longer a proposal, a rumour, or a theoretical policy experiment, they are in force, and they are here to stay. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu deserves credit for taking a bold but necessary step to reform a tax system that for years placed a disproportionate burden on salary earners while leaving loopholes for inefficiency and abuse. 

    At a time when hard choices must be made to stabilise the economy and protect the most vulnerable, the administration opted for reform over populism. That decision, now backed by real-life outcomes, is proving to be both timely and pro-people.

    Unfortunately, from the moment the tax bills were introduced, they became targets of deliberate misinformation. Opposition figures and social media commentators, many with little understanding of tax policy, weaponised fear for political gain.

    Nigerians were told their salaries would crash. Workers were warned they would take home less pay and be forced to shoulder higher taxes. PAYE was framed as a new punishment rather than a restructured relief. These falsehoods were repeated loudly and often, not because they were true, but because panic travels faster than facts in the digital age.

    Today, facts are catching up with fear. As January pay slips landed, Nigerians began sharing their lived experiences, not government talking points, but personal testimony. Salary earners openly confirmed that while gross figures adjusted, net pay actually increased. PAYE deductions reduced. Taxes dropped. From verified voices on social media to private messages thanking professionals who explained the law early on, the evidence is mounting: many workers are paying less tax, not more. 

    Read Also: Fed Govt ends use of tax credit scheme for road construction

    As some commentators rightly observed, a large number of Nigerians were never going to be negatively affected in the first place. The new tax laws are, by design, pro poor, protective of low and middle income earners with focus on fairness. The noise is fading. The numbers are speaking. And they are telling a very different story from the one Nigerians were sold.

    Beyond the immediate relief Nigerians are experiencing, these reforms are fundamentally about long-term national building, creating a fair, transparent, and sustainable tax system that strengthens public finance, supports development, and lays the groundwork for a more stable and prosperous Nigeria. The noise is fading. The numbers are speaking. And they are telling a very different story from the one Nigerians were sold.

    *Arabinrin Aderonke Atoyebi is a policy analyst, a finalist of the 2016 CNN Africa Journalism Awards, and currently serves as Technical Assistant on Broadcast Media to the Executive Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service. She writes from Abuja.

  • Hashim: New tax reforms will put Nigeria in global GDP league

    Hashim: New tax reforms will put Nigeria in global GDP league

    • IMF projects 1.5% Nigeria’s contribution this year

    An alumnus of Harvard University and Chief Executive Officer of Cubical Vertex Solutions Limited, Abdullahi Hashim, has said Nigeria’s new tax reforms have begun to reshape global perceptions of the nation’s economy.

    He alluded to the projection by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that Nigeria will contribute 1.5 per cent to global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) this year.

    Hashim, who is also a member of Nigerian Society of Engineers (NSE) and the Council for the Regulation of Engineering in Nigeria (COREN), said the IMF’s outlook reflected the growing international confidence in Nigeria’s economic direction, provided that the reforms are properly implemented.

    Hashim said this while addressing reporters on Tesday in Abuja.

    Read Also: PDP condemns Senate’s rejection of electronic transmission of results

    The engineer explained that the projection was directly linked to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu adminisration’s new tax reforms, which have signalled to the international community that Nigeria is attempting to fix long-standing structural weaknesses.

    He said: “The issue now is that IMF also puts Nigeria as a real global GDP contributor of 1.5 per cent. Do you know the reason? It’s based on this particular new tax reform laws. In its projection for 2026, it said Nigeria will contribute to the global GDP 1.5 per cent,” Hashim said

    The former top official on Public Private Partnerships (PPP) under former Presidents Umaru Musa Yar’Adua and Goodluck Jonathan stressed that beyond the global recognition, the potential domestic gains could be significant, especially in employment creation and foreign direct investment inflows.

    When asked about the advantages and disadvantages of the new tax reforms, Hashim said: “Yeah, there are certain disadvantages. But the main advantage is if truly implemented and the factors put in place are realistically adhered to.

  • ‘Tax reforms have wiped out middle class’

    ‘Tax reforms have wiped out middle class’

    A tax policy expert at University of Lagos, Prof. Isaac Nwaogwugwu, has said the tax reforms by the Federal Government have wiped out Nigeria’s middle class, attributing the situation to poorly designed and inconsistently implemented macroeconomic policies.

    Nwaogwugwu spoke while delivering a lecture at the 21st Adekunle Kukoyi Memorial Lecture organised by Nigerian Institution of Surveyors, Lagos Branch, at Alausa in Ikeja.

    The lecture: “Nigeria under the Grip of Tax Reforms: Exploring the Politics, Economics and Geospatial Dimensions of the Act,” examined the impact of tax policies on the nation’s economy and citizens’ welfare.

    According to the him, the primary objective of the tax reforms is to streamline the tax system, reduce multiple taxation and the high cost of collection, as well as boost revenue generation.

    He noted that what was initially introduced as short-term pain has become a permanent feature of the country’s socio-economic reality, stressing that repeated reforms have failed to address the deep-rooted structural imbalances in the economy.

    “The reforms of the Federal Government have eradicated the middle class. Macroeconomic policies have not delivered the expected results due to poor policy design, inconsistency in implementation and corruption,” he said.

    He listed objectives of the reforms to include economic diversification away, growth, job creation, increased income, improved non-oil revenue and enhanced welfare of citizens, but maintained that these goals have largely remained unrealised.

    Read Also: Nigeria, U.S. deepen partnership as Ribadu highlights gains on terrorism

    The professor urged the government to inject more funds into the economy to stimulate growth and enable micro, small, medium and large-scale enterprises to thrive, noting that a vibrant productive sector is essential to rebuilding the middle class and achieving inclusive growth.

    Earlier, the Acting Surveyor-General of Lagos State, Olalekan Odupe, said the state government remained committed to supporting governance reforms through reliable geospatial infrastructure and data-driven solutions that would promote fiscal sustainability, urban development and national growth.

    Also speaking, the Chairman of the Nigerian Institution of Surveyors, Lagos Branch, Adedeji Olanrewaju, described the lecture theme as timely, saying it addressed critical issues of leadership, good governance, integrity and socio-economic development.

    The event also featured the presentation of prizes to winners of the Adekunle Kukoyi Memorial Lecture Essay Competition for secondary and tertiary institutions. It was attended by members of the Kukoyi family, surveyors from Lagos, Ogun and Oyo states, women and young surveyors, as well as students.

  • Tax reforms have wiped out Nigeria’s middle class — UNILAG professor

    Tax reforms have wiped out Nigeria’s middle class — UNILAG professor

    A tax policy expert at the University of Lagos, Prof. Isaac Nwaogwugwu, has said ongoing Federal Government tax reforms have effectively eroded Nigeria’s middle class, blaming the outcome on weak policy design and inconsistent macroeconomic implementation.

    Nwaogwugwu made the assertion on Wednesday while delivering a lecture at the 21st Adekunle Kukoyi Memorial Lecture organised by the Nigerian Institution of Surveyors, Lagos Branch, held in Alausa, Ikeja.

    The lecture, titled “Nigeria under the Grip of Tax Reforms: Exploring the Politics, Economics and Geospatial Dimensions of the Act,” examined the broader impact of tax policies on the economy and citizens’ welfare.

    According to the professor, although the reforms were introduced to streamline the tax system, reduce multiple taxation, cut collection costs, and improve revenue generation, their unintended consequence has been prolonged economic hardship for Nigerians.

    He argued that what was initially presented as short-term fiscal pain has become a lasting socio-economic burden, noting that successive reforms have failed to correct deep-rooted structural imbalances.

    “The many reforms of the Federal Government have eradicated the middle class. Macroeconomic policies have not delivered expected outcomes due to poor policy design, inconsistency in implementation, and corruption,” he said.

    Nwaogwugwu listed the stated objectives of the reforms to include economic diversification, job creation, income growth, increased non-oil revenue, and improved welfare, but maintained that most of these targets remain largely unmet.

    He urged the government to inject more liquidity into the economy to stimulate growth, strengthen enterprises across all scales, and rebuild a productive sector capable of restoring the middle class and driving inclusive development.

    Earlier, the Acting Surveyor-General of Lagos State, Olalekan Odupe, reaffirmed the state’s commitment to governance reforms through geospatial infrastructure and data-driven solutions to enhance fiscal sustainability and urban development.

    Also speaking, Chairman of the Nigerian Institution of Surveyors, Lagos Branch, Adedeji Olanrewaju, described the lecture theme as timely, saying it addressed critical issues around leadership, governance, integrity, and socio-economic progress.

    The event featured prize presentations to winners of the Adekunle Kukoyi Memorial Lecture Essay Competition for secondary and tertiary institutions and was attended by members of the Kukoyi family, surveyors from Lagos, Ogun, and Oyo states, as well as students, women, and young professionals.

  • A commitment to citizens’ prosperity

    A commitment to citizens’ prosperity

    • By Bunmi Obakoya

    The recently enacted tax reforms have continued to spark nationwide discussion, cutting across political, economic, and social spheres. Given Nigeria’s decades-old tax framework, the heightened attention is hardly surprising.

    Economic analysts and public commentators have weighed in extensively, offering diverse perspectives. Beyond the noise, however, several seasoned voices have stepped forward to provide measured and forward-looking insights.

     Nigerians should approach the reforms with optimism, it  is a transformative policy shift with long-term generational benefits.

    Read Also: Court sacks Abure, orders INEC to recognise Nenadi-led leadership of Labour Party

    I fully understand the anxiety and concerns being expressed.  Such reactions are natural, especially considering that many Nigerians are unfamiliar with reforms of this scale.

     The driving force behind the policy is the government’s focus on sustainable prosperity and the socio-economic well-being of citizens.

    A simple review of ongoing projects across the country shows a deliberate commitment to infrastructure development aimed at improving livelihoods and economic growth.

    Reflecting on the broader picture,  on a philosophical note: “After the rain comes the sunshine.”

    • Obakoya wrote in from Unilag

  • NRS chair: Tax reforms will support sustainable growth

    NRS chair: Tax reforms will support sustainable growth

    • ‘Laws not targeted at opposition figures’

    The tax laws that took effect last week will support sustainable development and rapid economic growth, Executive Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS), formerly Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), Dr. Zacch Adedeji, has said.

    Speaking on a national television yesterday, Adedeji explained that while tax reform often attracts political commentary, the overriding objective remains the stability of the economy and the development of credible institutions capable of supporting long-term national progress.

    He dismissed fears that the new tax reform framework could be used by the Federal Government to marginalise political opposition or target individuals based on political affiliation.

    Adedeji said the reforms were driven by national interest and institutional accountability.

    He responded to concerns that the new tax regime might be weaponised through selective enforcement or politically motivated scrutiny of tax compliance records.

    He noted that such insinuations were misdirected, stressing that the administration’s approach to tax reform is guided by transparency, due process and a commitment to building strong and credible institutions.

    Addressing a question on whether the reforms could be used to suppress opposition voices, Adedeji said: “We need to commend the courage of Mr. President, that even though there is an election coming, he is courageous enough to continue on this path of statesmanship, not of that of politicians.”

    He explained that it would have been easier politically for the government to avoid far-reaching fiscal and institutional reforms ahead of an election cycle, but the President chose to continue with measures aimed at strengthening the country’s fiscal foundation and improving economic governance.

    Read Also: Stransact, NRS collaborate on new tax law enlightenment

    According to him, the tax reform agenda is focused on correcting structural weaknesses in the system, improving fairness, and creating a simplified and predictable compliance environment that encourages voluntary participation rather than fear or coercion.

    Adedeji said the scepticism expressed in some quarters is influenced by Nigeria’s historical concerns about how public institutions have previously been perceived.

    He maintained that the new framework is being designed to reduce discretion in tax administration and ensure that processes are rule-based.

    He said the NRS was working to institutionalise systems that promote accountability, automation and stronger governance safeguards, so that tax administration is guided by law rather than individual judgment or political influence.

    The NRS Chairman added that the reform journey places strong emphasis on trust between government and taxpayers, noting that confidence grows when citizens are assured that tax policies are not shaped by partisan considerations.

    He said the administration’s approach is centred on expanding growth opportunities, sustainably strengthening public finances and creating a system where citizens can clearly see the relationship between taxes paid and improvements in public services.

    He said the ongoing implementation process will continue through structured phases, with the ultimate goal of building a tax environment that supports investment, protects vulnerable groups and strengthens confidence in public administration, while insulating tax processes from political interference.

  • PDP’s immoral war against tax reforms

    PDP’s immoral war against tax reforms

    The new tax law from onset was controversial. Early opposition came from northern political leaders and governors who had thought the north would be short-changed by the new tax laws. Of course, that was not unexpected in a multi-ethnic nation where ethnic nationalities are always in competition.  At a point, the National Economic Council advised the president who is never afraid of taking risks, to withdraw the Bills from the lawmakers to allow for wider consultation. He refused, urging those who had misgivings to wait for lawmakers’ public hearing. He was not prepared to give his political enemies an opportunity to sabotage his tax reforms initiative.

    While an observation by Abdulsamad Dasuki of the House of Representatives that the versions of the tax laws gazetted and made public contained provisions never debated or approved by lawmakers has only energized the president many enemies, he was not going to allow them to throw away the baby with the birth water.

    He clearly understands if his political foes including Atiku Abubkar and Peter Obi, who out of greed splintered their party into three during the 2023 election,  Kabiru Turaki PDP factional leader who unable to resolve his party’s intra party crisis, sought help from Donald Trump, the nemesis of democracy in America, the Nigerian Bar Association where some of its ignoble members have continued to play opposition politics in the name of the association, and the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) that would rather blame Tinubu’s two years administration for insecurity arising from the eight million out of school children and the ‘almajiris’, they bred over the years, don’t agree on anything, they are united by their opposition to his presidency.

    The opposition to the tax law was therefore just another attempt at sabotaging his policies. That was why the strategy for opportunistic Peter Obi, who now says “Nigeria must rethink taxation if it is serious about economic growth, national unity and are prosperity”. And he was probably not expecting anything different from Peter Obi who is now counselling Nigerians saying “You cannot tax your way out of poverty, you must produce your way out of it” after being an importer of the labour of other societies since he left school, the reason Tinubu describes him as ‘container economist.

    President Tinubu, had while signing his four tax reforms bills which include the Nigeria Tax Act, the Nigeria Tax Administration Act, the Nigeria Revenue Service Act, and the Joint Revenue Board Act, into law on June 26, 2025 told Nigerians that   they were meant to “overhaul the Nigerian tax landscape to drive economic growth, increase revenue generation, improve the business environment, and enhance effective tax administration across the different levels of government”. Some of the laws took effect from the day it was signed while the remaining was programmed to become operational on January 1. This date, the president insisted, remained sacrosanct because according to him: “Absolute trust is built over time through making the right decisions, not through premature, reactive measures”.

    But despite support by professionals and institutions including the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) and declaration by the chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele, that it was too late in the day to stop the law because two of the four tax laws were already operational, opposition leader continued to mobilise against the take-off date.

    Read Also: Bashiru to Wike: you lack locus to dabble into APC affairs

    But for President Tinubu who describes the new tax laws as “a once-in-a-generation opportunity to build a fair, competitive and robust fiscal foundation for Nigeria”, relief came for the president with the dismissal of a suit filed by ‘the Incorporated Trustee of African Initiative for abuse of Public Trust’ calling for interim injunction to stop the laws’ take-off, by Justice Bello Kawu for lack of merit. The court had ruled that “once a law has been duly enacted and gazetted, disagreement or objections cannot, on their own, justify stopping its implementation; any alleged errors must be addressed through legislative amendment or a substantive court”.

    It is not as if the forces against the take-off date were unaware of the above provision; it is about the culture of ‘if we cannot have it, no one else must have it. The tragedy of our nation is that those who pillaged and plundered our land ‘materially and morally’, shared our common patrimony through fraudulent privatization and monetization policies, and those who introduced ‘political sharia ’after sending our kids to Osama Bin Laden in Sudan for indoctrination, unleashed Niger Delta militants and Boko Haram on Nigerians are today posing as our new messiahs. Unfortunately, our youths below 30, their targets are not aware of their baleful legacies.

    For instance, there can be no democracy without credible election. It is through it people participate in decision making in society. However, PDP that presided over the conduct of the most scandalous election in 2003 and 2007 became the greatest threat to democracy. Today, PDP and Labour Party sore losers, who have refused to congratulate a winner of an election after two years even as they run from one platform to the other at every election season in search of platform, cannot be said to be assets to democracy. With the exit of Obasanjo, the apostle or promoter of do or die election, Tony Anenih, PDP “Mr. Fixer” and Maurice Iwu, most Nigerians will admit an improvement in the quality of our elections since 2015. Unfortunately, those who only yesterday mounted an assault on the democratization process now want Nigerians to believe that President Tinubu, who remained faithful to his ideological orientation since 1999, built up a coalition that ended PDP 60 year’s dream of uninterrupted reign, has suddenly become a threat to democracy.

    Our youths who are below 30 years of age must be reminded that it was not only democracy that came under serious threat under PDP 16 years reign; the economy came under serious assault. A House of Representatives’ probe report of PDP subsidy regime in 2011 showed that N1.7t trillion was stolen through mindless importation by PDP leading lights while their siblings without importing a pint of fuel also stole several billions. VP Atiku Abubakar presided over the privatization fraud that led to Nigeria selling assets worth $100b for a paltry $1.5b. Obasanjo and his PDP children spent between $8-13billion on the energy sector which only produced darkness while Jonathan spent some more billions before selling the unbundled PHCN to prominent PDP leaders.

    About 40,000 barrels of crude oil was, according to Finance Minister, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, stolen daily. It is on record that she along with Chukwuma Soludo, Obasanjo’s CBN governor, predicted that anyone that inherited power from Jonathan will inherit an economy in ruins. Buhari might have contributed to Nigeria’s economic nightmare, the architect of poverty are today trying to exploit current hardship of Nigerians arising from government hard economic choices designed to change the narrative.

    The judiciary has also come under serious assault of PDP and its media since the 2023 election which they lost ‘round and square’. But if one may ask, how did the judiciary fare under PDP 16 years reign?  Joseph Jibueze in his “Legacies of the Judiciary between 1999 and 2014- How sabotage, blackmail, undue delays are killing the judiciary” provided some details on the legacies of the judiciary during the reign of PDP.

    The resourceful judicial reporter cited the case of Ayo Fayose’s allegation of financial misappropriation that dragged on for eight years before winning a controversial election in 2014 even while facing eligibility case in court. Fayose was to later invade the court trying his case with thugs. According to Justice Daramola,  Chief Judge of Ekiti State: “The thugs invaded my court, tore the record books, beat the court officials, descended on Hon. Justice J. Adeyeye, the presiding judge in court 3, beat and dragged him the ground”. After inauguration, Fayose chased out 19 elected members of opposition and ruled with seven PDP members. There was the Halliburton case where “American company officials involved in bribing Nigerian officials were jailed after conviction while their collaborators who received bribe in Nigeria walked away free.

    He also cited the case of James Ibori, accused of stealing US$250m from public purse. He was on April 17, 2012 jailed by Southwick Crown Court in London and sentenced to 13 years imprisonment. That was after 171-count charge of money laundering fraud and corruption filed against him in Federal High Court, Kaduna was discontinued in his favour and the appeal court was eventually discharged and acquitted when arraigned before Justice Marcel Awokulehin in Asaba.

    For PDP warring family members, whether in ADC or staying back to fight it out, ‘all is fair in love as in war’. For them, rules and laws are for others. The president understands he cannot put his faith in the hands of those who, in the process of sharing spoils of war, are prepared to pull down the edifice over their own heads.

  • Tax reforms not to marginalise opposition-Adedeji

    Tax reforms not to marginalise opposition-Adedeji

    Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS), Dr. Zacch Adedeji, has dismissed fears that the new tax reform framework could be used by the Federal Government to marginalise political opposition or target individuals on the basis of political affiliation, insisting that the reforms are driven by national interest and institutional accountability.

    Adedeji spoke during an interview on the Arise TV programme, ThisDay Live, where he responded to concerns that the new tax regime might be weaponised through selective enforcement or politically motivated scrutiny of tax compliance records.

    He noted that such insinuations were misdirected, stressing that the administration’s approach to tax reform is guided by transparency, due process and a commitment to building strong and credible institutions.

    Addressing a question on whether the reforms could be used to suppress opposition voices, Adedeji said:“I think the question you will ask is that we need to commend the courage of Mr. President, that despite the fact that there is an election coming, he is courageous enough to continue on this path of statesmanship, not of that of politicians.”

    He explained that it would have been easier politically for the government to avoid far-reaching fiscal and institutional reforms ahead of an election cycle but the President chose to continue with measures aimed at strengthening the country’s fiscal foundation and improving economic governance.

    Read Also: How tax administration can be successful, by Muda Yusuf

    According to him, the tax reform agenda is focused on correcting structural weaknesses in the tax system, improving fairness, and creating a simplified and predictable compliance environment that encourages voluntary participation rather than fear or coercion.

    Adedeji said the scepticism expressed in some quarters is influenced by Nigeria’s historical concerns about how public institutions have previously been perceived but maintained that the new framework is being designed to reduce discretion in tax administration and ensure that processes are rule-based.

    He stated that the NRS is working to institutionalise systems that promote accountability, automation and stronger governance safeguards, so that tax administration is guided by law rather than individual judgment or political influence.

    The NRS Chairman added that the reform journey places strong emphasis on trust between government and taxpayers, noting that confidence grows when citizens are assured that tax policies are not shaped by partisan considerations.

    He said the administration’s approach is centered on expanding opportunities for growth, strengthening public finances in a sustainable manner and creating a system where citizens can clearly see the relationship between taxes paid and improvements in public services.

    Adedeji reiterated that while tax reform often attracts political commentary, the overriding objective remains the stability of the economy and the development of credible institutions capable of supporting long-term national progress.

    He said the ongoing implementation process will continue through structured phases, with the ultimate goal of building a tax environment that supports investment, protects vulnerable groups and strengthens confidence in public administration, while insulating tax processes from political interference.

  • Tax mischief

    Tax mischief

    Against all odds, President Bola Tinubu’s much heralded tax reforms have come into force.

    The new acts are supposed to ensure uniformity in tax revenue administration across Nigeria, eliminate double taxation, use taxation to encourage private sector investment in critical industries and boost disposable incomes through targeted tax exemptions.

    The poorest in society are expected to be winners under the new arrangement. Individuals earning below the minimum wage are exempted from the Pay As You Earn (PAYE) tax. Similarly, small businesses with annual turnovers of N50 million or less would be excused from paying taxes.

    The new laws reduce corporate income tax rate from 30% to 25% over the next two years as a way of alleviating financial pressures on businesses and foster investment.

    From the very start the legislations have been greeted with intense suspicion, especially up North.

    Most people who have taken the trouble to read through the legislations or even familiarise themselves with summaries, admit that while not perfect, the bills are a massive improvement on what we currently have. Of course, they challenge states which are currently content with heading to Abuja for the monthly handout from FAAC, to do more about boosting economic activity in their domains.

    READ ALSO; Why I walked away as Finance Minister – Kemi Adeosun

    But, surely, no one can quarrel with tax exemptions for the poorest of the poor, or cuts for struggling families. Fair minded persons cannot be against reducing the taxation burdens on MSMES and other companies.

    What is most exhausting is that, in typical Nigerian fashion, what should be discourse about the economic wellbeing of citizens has been reduced to a political shouting match about plots to disadvantage one region or the other.

    Some of the most hysterical voices have been those who don’t even know what the new laws contain, but are content to recycle ignorant posts on social media.

    Others have even taken their mischief-making a notch higher. For instance, the story is told of how some months back farmers in parts of the North were misinformed that if they produced four baskets of onions or tomatoes, the government would take one of those baskets as tax! That is to say 25% of their produce.

    This caused quite a flap. In no time, clerics were already preaching inflammatory anti-government sermons about the supposedly evil new tax burden in their mosques on Fridays.

    Informed about the dangerous information being spread by these unknown individuals whose only goal was to torpedo the new legislation, some members of the Presidential Tax Committee quickly engaged influential clerics and stakeholders from the region in a town hall of sorts.

    By the time the engagement was halfway through, they had managed to calm inflamed emotions with proper information about what the new laws were about and what they were not. The bemused clerics kept glancing at each other in confusion because what they hearing wasn’t what they were told.

    Opponents of tax reforms got second wind because of the so-called alterations in the gazetted laws. But those who make these claims haven’t been able to show what was changed and for what purpose.

    The deliberate injection of falsehoods and innuendoes into what should be a sober conversation just speaks to the hidden agenda of these forces.

  • Oyedele: “Tax reforms will ease airline costs”

    Oyedele: “Tax reforms will ease airline costs”

    The Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee has listed a series of measures in the newly enacted tax reform laws which it said were deliberately designed to ease the tax burden on Nigerian airlines.

    The Committee made this disclosure on Monday to counter claims that the reforms would trigger steep fare increases and endanger domestic operators.

    Chairman of the Committee, Taiwo Oyedele, responded to recent remarks by the Chairman of Air Peace, Allen Onyema, who warned that ticket prices could climb to as high as N1 million once the new tax regime comes into effect.

    Oyedele said the Committee, working on behalf of the federal government, had “engaged extensively with airline operators and those engagements are ongoing,” adding that the concerns of industry players were being taken seriously in the ongoing reform process.

    According to him, “Contrary to the claim that the new tax laws will hurt the industry, the reform is part of the solution, not the source of the problem.” 

    He explained that long-standing tax bottlenecks which had fuelled operating costs in the aviation sector were being addressed through the new framework.

    He stated, “Several long-standing tax issues driving costs in the sector have been resolved in the new tax laws or are being structurally addressed,” noting that the provisions were crafted to strengthen airlines rather than weaken them.

    One of the central components of the reform is the removal of the 10 per cent withholding tax on aircraft leases, which Oyedele described as the biggest tax burden faced by operators.

    “The single biggest tax burden on airlines has been the 10 percent withholding tax (WHT) on aircraft leases under the existing law. This has now been removed and replaced with a rate to be determined in a regulation, creating the legal basis for either a full exemption or a significantly lower rate,” he said.

    He explained that the previous withholding tax regime inflicted severe cash flow strain on airlines because the tax was non-recoverable. 

    “To put this in context, on a $50 million aircraft lease, an airline currently pays $5 million in WHT, which is non-recoverable and therefore directly increases operating costs and strains cash flow. Eliminating this burden is a major structural relief for the sector,” he added.

    Oyedele also addressed the issue of Value Added Tax (VAT) recovery, noting that while the temporary suspension of VAT in 2020 was attractive in principle, it came at a hidden cost to operators who could not claim input VAT on several operational expenses.

    Under the new laws, he said, airlines would become fully VAT-neutral, with the ability to claim VAT on imported and locally procured assets, consumables, and services.

    “Any VAT paid on imported or locally procured assets, consumables, and services will become fully claimable. Where an airline has excess input VAT, the law mandates a refund within 30 days, supported by a fully funded tax refund account and the option to offset VAT credits against other tax liabilities. This directly reduces cost pressure and improves liquidity,” he said.

    He further clarified that exemptions on commercial aircraft, engines and spare parts remain intact. “Existing exemptions on commercial aircraft, engines, and spare parts remain fully in place. There is no reversal or new burden introduced under the tax reforms,” he stated.

    Addressing concerns over the impact of VAT on ticket prices, Oyedele said that airline operations operate on thin margins and that the effective impact of a 7.5 per cent VAT — within a VAT-recoverable system — is much lower than feared.

    He explained, “Even in a worst-case scenario where VAT were not claimable, the maximum impact would still be 7.5 percent, not the price increases being suggested. That is, a N125,000 ticket becomes not more than N134,375 and a N350,000 ticket not more than N376,250.”

    According to him, the new laws also introduce a pathway to reduce corporate income tax from 30 per cent to 25 per cent, a development expected to benefit airlines and other businesses. He added that several profit-based levies — including Tertiary Education Tax, NASENI, NITDA and Police levies — had been consolidated into a single Development Levy to simplify tax administration and improve certainty.

    Oyedele acknowledged the long-standing problem of multiple charges faced by airlines but insisted that these were not created by the new tax reforms.

    “The multiplicity of levies imposed on airlines and flight tickets is real, but these charges are not created by the new tax laws. It is therefore incorrect to attribute them to the reform,” he said.

    He added that government agencies were working with operators to address these concerns. “The government is actively working with operators and relevant agencies to achieve a lasting solution. Importantly, the tax harmonisation provisions in the new laws mean the situation can only improve, not worsen, from 2026,” he noted.

    Overall, Oyedele maintained that “the new tax laws provide a strong legal and policy framework to resolve the long-standing tax challenges in the aviation sector, reduce operating costs for airlines, and ensure minimal impact on passengers.”

    His intervention followed concerns raised by Air Peace Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Allen Onyema, who in an interview warned that the domestic aviation sector was under severe financial strain and risked collapse under the new tax regime.

    Onyema said the cumulative effect of levies, charges and high borrowing costs had placed airlines under intense pressure. “The Nigerian airlines are heavily overburdened by taxes, levies, and all manner of charges. Just take a ticket of about 350,000. What comes to the airlines is about 81,000 Naira. And people, everybody’s talking about the airlines as if they’re making a kill. It’s not true,” he said.

    He criticised what he described as multiple and overlapping deductions, including a mandatory five per cent NCAA charge on every ticket. “We are suffering multiple taxation, multiple charges. For example, the NCAA, five percent for every ticket, mandatorily. That is to NCAA alone. There are so many other charges,” Onyema said.

    He argued that the charges weaken demand and contradict international aviation standards, stating that the International Civil Aviation Organisation recommends cost-based fees rather than revenue-driven charges.

    Read Also: U.S., Nigeria get kudos on joint strike on terrorists

    “That is, you charge according to the cost of the services you render to the airlines. Who are the ones suffering? The airlines. And that’s why the airlines are not growing,” he said.

    Onyema referenced the 2020 tax law which removed customs duties and VAT on aircraft, spare parts and ticket fares, saying it had provided significant relief to operators at the time.

    “Now, the tax law of 2020 removed customs duties, removed on imported aircraft and imported aircraft spares and engines, removed VAT on imported aircraft and other spare parts, removed VAT on ticket fares. That is the 2020 Act,” he said.

    He warned that reintroducing VAT on aircraft purchases and spare parts — alongside high bank lending rates — could worsen the financial position of airlines. “Funds borrowed from the bank are 30–35 percent. So you bring in spare parts, you pay 7.5% on your spare parts. Ticket fares will hit $1.7 million soon. At 35% we are choking. You don’t do that,” he said.

    According to him, the effect would ultimately be passed to passengers. “Because when you take five percent from what we charge, it reduces the demand… With 7.5% on ticket fares, ticket fares will hit $1.7 million soon. If we implement that tax reform, Nigerian airlines will go down in three months,” he warned.

    Onyema said the Airline Operators of Nigeria had made presentations to the National Assembly and the tax reform committee to outline the severity of the situation. “We submitted, nobody listened to us. We went to the National Assembly. We addressed them on this issue and they saw reasons with us. They were surprised at the kind of facts we’re bringing out,” he said.

    Despite his concerns, Onyema commended the federal government for past interventions, saying, “One thing I like about the government is that they’re listening… because I know so many things we’ve asked them to do and they did it for us.”

    Responding to these concerns, Oyedele urged stakeholders to maintain constructive dialogue. “If the current engagement with industry stakeholders is sustained, the remaining non-tax issues will be resolved sooner rather than later. Claims not grounded in fact do not help this process. The new tax laws are not the problem, they are a critical part of the solution,” he said.