Tag: Tax

  • Tinubu directs FG to ease tax burden on small businesses — Oyedele

    Tinubu directs FG to ease tax burden on small businesses — Oyedele

    Nigerian economist, accountant, and public policy expert Taiwo Oyedele has revealed that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has directed the Federal Government to ease the tax burden on small businesses and stop policies that worsen poverty.

    Oyedele, who chairs the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, made the disclosure during a Small and Medium Enterprises Development Agency of Nigeria (SMEDAN) town hall meeting with artisans and traders in Abuja.

    According to him, the President has instructed that all stakeholders must work together to ensure the success of nano, micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises, rather than stifling them with multiple taxes.

    “You cannot build a society where businesses are not allowed to breathe,” Oyedele said. “The secret to the success of any society is enabling its 35 million nano, micro, small, and medium businesses to grow. Supporting MSMEs positively is essential because that is the real Nigeria.”

    He added that the President has also ordered an end to taxing poverty, capital, and seed, urging instead that government policies should support investment and business growth so that small enterprises can thrive.

    “The President directed that we should stop taxing poverty, capital, and seed. We should invest with the people so that the seed can turn into fruit,” he said.

    Read Also: Tax: Banks can’t debit account without owner’s consent

    Oyedele noted that most businesses in Nigeria operate at the nano level, expressing optimism that many could grow into billion-naira enterprises annually if given the right support.

    He also acknowledged growing public concerns about tax reforms, attributing them to misinformation. “There is a lot of negative misinformation about tax reform. Instead of excitement, people are afraid,” he said.

    “We understand that some of these accountants and payroll managers may not understand how to do the calculation on this new tax reform, so we are organising a virtual platform to put them through, so far twelve thousand people have registered. If the twelve thousand get it right which I know they will, millions of Nigerian workers will benefit. Before now anything goes, but it is not going to be business as usual”.

    He said, under this reform all the categorization apart from high earners in millions will be exempted from corporate income tax, again this is part of the Corporate Affairs Commission and SMEDAN partnership where the CAC is registering small businesses for free, Presently, CAC received five thousand applications everyday for free registration.

    “This is one of the deliberate policies of the government to encourage formalization of businesses. Formalization makes your businesses organise as you keep records. If your business is registered with CAC you enjoy a corporate tax rate at zero percent, you will also not pay the 4% development levy.

    Whether you are registered with the CAC or not, if your business does not make more than one hundred million naira a year you don’t need to charge VAT, BAT when anyone is paying you, you are not allowed to charge withholding tax or hold on to withholding tax either. Your money must be complete when you are being paid.

    Under this new reform tax law, employees are completely exempted from all forms of tax.

    For big companies, there is a provision to reduce their corporate tax rate from 30% to 25%. There are companies making more than one billion a year, there is good news for them too,  if you pay VAT on business products like manufacturing machines, vehicles, mobile phones including airtime that is used for business, these can be claimed back with receipts.

    Speaking the Director General SMEDAN, Charles Odii said, current Small Medium Enterprise right now stand at 39million as President Tinubu earmarked two hundred billion naira for SMEs. It is for them to access it as a single digit business loan. We will keep encouraging our small businesses on production of made in Nigeria. 

  • Tax: Banks can’t debit account without owner’s consent

    Tax: Banks can’t debit account without owner’s consent

    The Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee has said that banks cannot debit customers accounts for taxes without the consent of such customers.

    Chairman, Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, Mr Taiwo Oyedele, said that tax authorities in Nigeria do not have the power to directly debit or take money from people’s bank accounts.

    Oyedele was reacting to media reports suggesting that the Lagos State Government planned to start debiting the personal accounts of taxpayers who fail to pay their taxes.

    He described such reports as misleading, noting that they did not reflect how the law actually works.

    He explained that what exists in Nigerian tax law is the “power of substitution,” which is very different from directly taking money from a person’s bank account.

    He said: “The power of substitution is a tax recovery method that allows the tax authority to ask a third party to pay money that belongs to a taxpayer who has refused to settle a confirmed and unpaid tax debt. This only happens after all legal and administrative steps, including court appeals, have been completed”.

    According to him, the power of substitution cannot be used freely or without limits as it is tightly controlled by law and can only be applied after a long process has been followed.

    “This is not an arbitrary or routine action. It is a last resort that can only be used after enquiries, assessments, objections, final notices and court appeals have all been concluded, and the tax debt has become final and legally due,” Oyedele said.

    He also allayed fears among low-income earners and small business owners pointing out that people who earn the national minimum wage or small businesses that fall below the taxable threshold are not affected by such measure like power of substitution.

    He said: “The power of substitution only makes sense where there is a large and confirmed tax debt. Most low-income earners and small businesses do not fall into this category under the new tax laws”.

    He explained that this approach is not unique to Nigeria as many countries use similar systems to recover unpaid taxes.

    “This is a global practice. Other countries also allow tax authorities to use third parties, such as through garnishment or third-party payment notices, to collect confirmed tax debts,” Oyedele said.

    He pointed out that the main reason for having this power is to make the tax system fair to everyone.

    He said: “Without strong tools to enforce payment, honest taxpayers end up carrying the burden, while those who refuse to pay are encouraged. This can put pressure on government finances and lead to higher taxes for everyone else”.

    Read Also: New tax laws boost workers’ January salary- Oyedele

    He outlined the strict conditions that must be met before the power of substitution can be used. He said the tax authority must first complete the full process of establishing the tax debt, the debt must be final and legally due, and the taxpayer must have refused or failed to pay within the time given in writing.

    He added that when a third party is appointed as a “substitute,” it means the person or organisation holds money belonging to the taxpayer or owes the taxpayer some money.

    “The tax authority can send a notice to anyone who is holding funds for the taxpayer or owes the taxpayer money,” Oyedele said.

    He explained that such a person is not forced to act without a chance to respond. He said the law allows the appointed party to either comply or formally object in writing within 30 days, stating clear reasons for the objection.

    He said: “There are also full rights of appeal under the tax dispute system, just like with any tax assessment”.

    He said there were several protections in place to prevent abuse of the process, including the right to due process in assessing the tax, the right of the substitute to object, the right to appeal, and the involvement of the Office of the Tax Ombud to protect taxpayer rights.

    He insisted that the power of substitution was not meant to punish people or be used regularly.

    He said: “It is a carefully controlled tool designed to make sure the tax system is fair. It exists to ensure that people who have a confirmed and lawful tax debt cannot simply ignore their obligation to pay”.

    He urged the public to seek correct information and not be misled by reports that suggest tax authorities can simply reach into bank accounts without following the law.

  • New tax laws boost workers’ January salary- Oyedele

    New tax laws boost workers’ January salary- Oyedele

    Many Nigerian workers who received their January 2026 salaries are already noticing improved take-home pay following a reduction in deductions under the Pay As You Earn (PAYE) tax system.

    The development was disclosed by Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, in a statement shared on his WhatsApp platform.

    He said feedback from employees across multiple sectors indicates that the new tax laws are beginning to ease the financial burden on workers.

    “To ensure that those responsible for implementing these changes in their organisations fully understand the process, the committee is organising an implementation session in collaboration with the Joint Revenue Board,” Oyedele stated.

    He explained that the session will target senior officials involved in salary administration and tax compliance, including Human Resources directors, payroll managers, chief financial officers, tax managers, and other executives overseeing staff remuneration.

    Oyedele also dismissed public concerns about alleged new charges on electronic transfers and bank deposits, clarifying that the tax reforms did not introduce any new levy on bank transfers or funds held in personal accounts.

    “The new laws did not create any tax on electronic transfers or money in your bank account. In fact, many businesses can now claim back input VAT on bank charges,” he said.

    To ensure that banks and other financial institutions understand how to apply the new rules, Oyedele said a separate engagement session was recently held. The meeting brought together the Nigeria Revenue Service, the Joint Revenue Board, the Central Bank of Nigeria, and the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee.

    Read Also: First Lady celebrates Ogun dep. gov, Salako-Oyedele, at 60

    He noted that the session included officials such as risk and compliance officers, legal advisers, chief financial officers, and regulatory affairs executives from fintech companies, commercial and microfinance banks, pension fund operators, asset managers, investment and securities firms, and other financial institutions.

    During the discussions, participants focused on making sure customers are not wrongly charged, especially in the area of taxes linked to bank services. They also talked about the need for a Tax Identification Number for bank accounts used for business or income purposes, a rule that has been in place since January 13, 2020.

    Other areas covered included giving customers clear guidance on how to file their tax returns and claim lawful deductions, as well as the removal of Tax Clearance Certificates as a requirement for foreign exchange transactions, to make it easier for people and businesses to operate.

    Oyedele added that the meeting also explained the proper process tax authorities must follow when using their powers to recover unpaid taxes, and the extra protections now available to taxpayers through the Office of the Tax Ombud.

    He said the overall goal of the tax reforms is to bring more people and businesses into the formal economy, reduce confusion caused by different tax rules, and improve access to financial services, while building trust and making the financial system work better for everyone.

  • Tax committee moves to ensure inclusive, coordinated implementation

    Tax committee moves to ensure inclusive, coordinated implementation

    The National Tax Policy Implementation Committee (NTPIC) has commenced structured stakeholder engagements to ensure a humane, inclusive, and well-coordinated implementation of the new Tax Acts, as the country undertakes significant fiscal reforms.

    The Committee, chaired by Mr. Joseph Tegbe, aims to bridge the gap between policy intent and execution by promoting clarity, managing expectations, and ensuring that implementation reflects the realities of businesses, citizens, and all levels of government.

    The Committee does this by working closely with the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) and the Presidential Fiscal Policy Reform Committee (PFPRC).

    As part of its initial consultations, the Committee leadership team met with the PFPRC, led by Mr. Taiwo Oyedele, to ensure alignment between reform objectives and practical implementation realities.

    Oyedele highlighted challenges arising from misinformation about certain provisions of the law, noting that some provisions had been misinterpreted in public discussions.

    Read Also: FULL LIST: Top 10 countries requiring $10,000+ proof of funds for student visas

    He added that targeted and accessible communication initiatives are being developed to address these gaps, with stakeholder feedback playing a key role in shaping the reform process.

    In a separate engagement with the Executive Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS), Dr. Zacch Adedeji, NTPIC focused on harmonising implementation priorities and strengthening institutional coordination. The NTPIC outlined its ongoing activities and implementation roadmap.

    Dr. Adedeji commended NTPIC’s proactive approach, describing the new tax laws as a significant development in Nigeria’s fiscal framework.

    He noted that while new policies may take time to gain full public acceptance, a transparent, well-sequenced, and education-driven implementation process will gradually build confidence and trust.

    The NTPIC emphasised that effective tax reform depends not only on legal and technical design but also on effective communication and stakeholder engagement.

    Tegbe stressed that structured stakeholder engagement and consistent communication are central to the success of the reforms.

    He assured that consultations will continue with the National Economic Council, the Nigerian Governors’ Forum, local government leaders, as well as traditional, religious, and community leaders.

    He reiterated that the new tax Acts are designed to create a simpler, fairer, and more predictable tax system that fosters voluntary compliance, strengthens investor confidence, and supports sustainable economic growth.

    The NTPIC team also included the Chairmen of the Stakeholders Engagement Subcommittee and the Technical Subcommittee, Barrister Ismael Ahmed and Mr. Ajibola Olomola, respectively.

  • How new tax order is reshaping revenue, investment, public trust

    How new tax order is reshaping revenue, investment, public trust

    The full implementation of the new Nigerian Tax Acts is expected to reshape government revenue, investor confidence and everyday tax experience of businesses and citizens across the country. Assistant Editor Nduka Chiejina reports

    By the time Nigeria’s new tax laws were passed and signed into law on June 26, 2025, the long road to that moment had already become a national conversation. It was a journey shaped by politics, public concern, policy adjustments and a deep debate about what fair taxation should look like in Africa’s largest economy.

    For many years, Nigeria’s tax system had a poor reputation among businesses and investors. It was often described as confusing, crowded with too many laws, and filled with different agencies collecting similar charges. Many business owners felt that those who tried to comply with the rules were punished more than those who avoided them. Small businesses complained about heavy costs, while low-income earners said the system placed too much pressure on them. At the same time, investors said the uncertainty discouraged long-term planning and investment.

    At the centre of the reform effort was the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, led by Taiwo Oyedele. The committee made it clear that the goal was not simply to collect more money for government, but to rebuild the system itself.

    “Public debate is important for reform,” Oyedele said during one of his public engagements. “But that debate must be based on facts, not wrong information.”

    From that process came four major laws: the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025; the Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2025; the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, 2025; and the Joint Revenue Board (Establishment) Act, 2025. Together, these laws form the foundation of a new tax system that government officials say is designed to be simpler, fairer and closer to global standards, while also protecting low-income earners and small businesses.

    A system that needed change

    Before the reforms, Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio was among the lowest in countries of similar size and development. This meant that, compared to the size of its economy, Nigeria collected very little in taxes. For government, this limited its ability to invest in roads, schools, hospitals and other public services.

    Businesses, on the other hand, complained about multiple taxes and levies coming from federal, state and local governments. In many cases, they said they were being charged several times on the same type of income or activity. The rules were often unclear, and dealing with tax offices could be stressful and time-consuming.

    Small businesses, which employ millions of Nigerians, were especially affected. Many of them stayed outside the formal system because they felt the cost of registration and compliance was too high for their size. This, in turn, meant the government could not properly track or support them.

    Oyedele summed up the problem in one of the committee’s early statements. He said Nigeria’s tax system had “for a long time been a barrier to growth, hurting productivity, discouraging investment and placing a heavy burden on the poor.”

    For the committee, the real challenge was not just to increase revenue, but to build a system that people would trust. They wanted a system that citizens and investors could see as fair, clear and predictable.

    This thinking shaped how the new laws were designed and how they will be introduced and implemented. While the laws that created new institutions, such as the Nigeria Revenue Service and the Joint Revenue Board, took effect in June 2025, the main tax and administration rules are scheduled to begin on January 1, 2026.

    Putting small businesses first

    One of the most discussed parts of the reform is the special treatment for small companies. Under the new rules, any business with annual turnover of N100 million or less, and total fixed assets below N250 million, will pay zero percent corporate income tax.

    The government says this is meant to protect small businesses and encourage them to register formally. These businesses make up a large part of Nigeria’s economy and provide jobs for millions of people, but many of them struggle to survive because of rising costs.

    “This is about recognising the reality on the ground,” said Dr. Wahab Balogun, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Ambosit Capital Managers. “You cannot grow an economy by putting too much pressure on the smallest businesses.”

    For larger companies, the laws provide a path for a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 30 per cent to 25 per cent. This change will depend on a presidential order, based on advice from the National Economic Council.

    The message from government is that Nigeria wants to become more attractive to investors, especially in a region where countries are competing with one another by offering lower and more stable tax rates.

    Connecting Nigeria to global tax rules

    Another key part of the reform is how Nigeria is aligning with international tax standards, especially the global minimum tax rules supported by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

    Under the new laws, local companies with revenue below N50 billion are exempt from the top-up tax. For multinational companies, the threshold is set at the equivalent of Euro 750 million in global revenue.

    Read Also: Nigeria reaffirms ECOWAS leadership as Shettima attends Guinea president’s inauguration

    This means Nigeria can take part in global efforts to prevent large companies from shifting profits to low-tax countries, while also protecting local firms from complex and costly international rules.

    The reforms also introduce a five percent annual tax credit for investments in sectors that government considers important for growth. These include manufacturing, agriculture, technology and infrastructure. Officials say this is meant to guide private investment into areas that can create jobs and strengthen the economy.

    Paying taxes in naira

    In a country where the exchange rate has often been unstable, the new laws also deal with how taxes on foreign currency transactions are paid.

    Under the reforms, all taxes must be paid in Naira, using the official market exchange rate. This is meant to make it easier for businesses to plan their cash flow and accounting, especially those involved in international trade.

    The committee says this rule will also help strengthen the use of the local currency and reduce confusion for both taxpayers and the tax authorities.

    Fuel surcharge and public reaction

    One of the most controversial parts of the reform has been the five per cent surcharge on fuel. When the news spread, many people believed it was a brand-new tax that would increase transport costs and make inflation worse.

    The committee moved quickly to address this concern. It explained that the surcharge already existed in law under the Federal Roads Maintenance Agency Act of 2007. The new Tax Act, it said, only brought the provision into the main tax framework to make it clearer and more transparent.

     “The surcharge is not new,” the committee said in a public note. “It has been in the law for years.”

    However, the law also states that the charge cannot take effect unless the Minister of Finance issues a specific order, which must be published in the Official Gazette.

    Certain products are exempt. These include household kerosene, cooking gas, compressed natural gas and clean or renewable energy products. This is meant to support Nigeria’s plans to move towards cleaner energy sources.

    The committee defended the surcharge as a way to provide steady funding for road maintenance. It argued that good roads reduce travel time, lower vehicle repair costs and make it cheaper to move goods across the country.

    According to the committee, many countries around the world use similar systems to make sure there is always money available to maintain their road networks.

    Relief for aviation industry

    The aviation sector has been one of the strongest voices in the tax reform discussions. Airlines in Nigeria operate in a difficult environment, with high fuel costs, foreign exchange challenges and many different charges.

    One of their biggest complaints was the 10 per cent withholding tax on aircraft leases. Airlines said this tax made it more expensive to acquire or lease planes, putting them at a disadvantage compared to foreign competitors.

    Under the new laws, this withholding tax has been removed. Instead, a new regulatory framework is introduced, which could allow for full exemption or a much lower rate.

    Oyedele explained the impact using a simple example. An airline leasing an aircraft for $50 million would previously have to pay $5 million as withholding tax, and that money could not be recovered. Removing this, he said, is a major relief for the industry.

    The reforms also change how value-added tax (VAT) applies to airlines. In the past, VAT was suspended on some airline activities, but airlines could not claim back VAT paid on many of their inputs, such as equipment and services.

    Under the new system, airlines can claim input VAT on assets, consumables and services. If they end up with more VAT credits than they owe, the law requires the tax authority to refund the excess within 30 days. The refund is backed by a special account, or the airline can choose to use the credit to reduce other tax bills.

    There has also been concern about how VAT might affect ticket prices. The committee argued that because airlines can now recover VAT on their inputs, the final impact on ticket prices would be much smaller than people fear.

     “Even in the worst case,” the committee said, “the increase would not be more than 7.5 percent.”

    Changes to Capital Gains Tax

    Another major area of reform is capital gains tax, especially for people who invest in shares and other capital market products.

    Previously, a flat rate of 10 per cent applied to gains from selling shares. Under the new laws, this has been replaced with a system that links capital gains to a person’s overall income. The tax rate can now range from zero to 30 per cent, depending on how much the investor earns in total.

    For large companies, the top rate is expected to match the planned reduction in corporate income tax.

    One important change is that investors can now deduct certain costs before calculating their taxable gain. These include capital losses, brokerage fees and some financing costs. In the past, many investors complained that they were being taxed on their gross gains, not on what they actually earned after expenses.

    The law also includes several exemptions. Small investors, pension funds, real estate investment trusts and small companies under the N100 million turnover threshold are not affected by the new capital gains tax rules.

    Investors who reinvest their money in Nigerian shares within 12 months can also qualify for exemption. This is meant to encourage long-term investment in the local stock market.

    To avoid taxing gains that were made before the new law takes effect, the rules reset the cost of existing investments. The new starting point will be the higher of the original purchase price or the market value as of December 31, 2025.

    The committee says these changes are not about raising more money for government, but about making Nigeria’s capital market more competitive and attractive to investors.

    Tax identification and bank accounts

    Few issues caused as much public worry as the link between tax identification and bank accounts. Messages spread online claiming that bank accounts would be frozen or money would be taken automatically from people who did not have a Tax ID.

    The committee responded directly. “Don’t panic,” one of its public notes said. “The Tax ID is for easier administration, not to punish people.”

    Under the law, only “taxable persons” are required to get a Tax ID. This includes people and businesses that are involved in trade, business or other income-generating activities.

    The requirement for business accounts has actually existed since 2020. What the new law does is to harmonise the system across federal and state governments.

    To make things easier, the Executive Chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) Dr. Zacch Adedeji noted that “the law allows individuals to use their National Identification Number (NIN) as their Tax ID. For companies, their Corporate Affairs Commission registration number can serve the same purpose.” This is meant to reduce paperwork and duplication.

    For Nigerians living abroad, the law provides a simplified process using the NIN for banking and investment activities in Nigeria.

    Sanctions will apply to taxable persons who fail to register by January 1, 2026. These may include restrictions on operating certain business or investment accounts. However, people who are not taxable are not required to get a Tax ID.

    Diaspora income and double taxation

    Another area of concern was whether Nigerians living abroad would be taxed on money they earn overseas or on remittances they send home.

    The law is clear on this point. Simply bringing money into Nigeria does not make it taxable. Tax only applies to income, profits or gains that come from activities in Nigeria.

    The new rules also include provisions to protect people from being taxed twice on the same income. This is especially important for Nigerians who live and work in other countries but still have business or investment ties to Nigeria.

    The government hopes this will encourage more investment and remittances from the diaspora.

    Fighting misinformation

    Throughout the reform process, the committee says it has had to deal with a lot of wrong or misleading information.

    Oyedele shared the story of an investor who refused to take part in a rights issue because he believed he would have to pay a 30 per cent capital gains tax. After checking the new law, he found out that he would actually be exempt.

     “Good news does not spread as fast as bad news,” Oyedele said. He warned that low awareness about tax rules makes people more likely to believe alarming claims.

    He also rejected reports that foreign investors were unhappy with the reform process. According to him, a call with 281 participants from more than 10 countries showed strong support for the engagement process.

     “Many of them said they wished we had more time,” he said. “That is very different from frustration.”

    The road ahead

    The success of the reforms will depend on how well the new Nigeria Revenue Service and the Joint Revenue Board can work together across federal and state levels. They will need to process refunds quickly, protect taxpayer data, and enforce the rules in a fair and respectful way.

    For businesses, the coming months will be a time to study the new rules and adjust their accounting and tax planning systems. For individuals, especially those with low incomes, the government’s promise is that they will pay less or nothing at all, while essential items like food, education and healthcare remain free from VAT.

    The larger goal is to build a system that people trust. If citizens believe the rules are fair and clear, more of them may be willing to register their businesses and pay taxes. This would widen the tax base and give government more stable resources to invest in public services, without having to introduce sudden or extra charges.

    As the committee’s public campaign often says, the key question for every claim about the new tax laws is simple: “Where is it in the law?”

    For Nigeria’s tax reform, the real answer will not only be found in the pages of the Official Gazette, but in how the new system affects the daily lives of business owners, workers, investors and ordinary citizens. It will be measured by whether people feel that what they pay to the state is matched by what they receive in return.

  • Re: ‘Bola’s Tax’- When ‘simple logic’ becomes simple misdirection

    Re: ‘Bola’s Tax’- When ‘simple logic’ becomes simple misdirection

    The Emmanuel Orjih’s essay being circulated is rhetorically powerful, but its “simplicity” is achieved by subtracting the very provisions that determine the outcome. That is not clarity; it is selective accounting.

    Let’s dismantle the argument on its own terms—calmly, sequentially, and with arithmetic that actually follows the law.

    1) The core confusion: pension and health insurance are not taxes—they are deductible contributions

    A tax is a compulsory payment to government for general public purposes with no direct ownership claim by the payer.

    A pension contribution is a deferred wage placed in a worker’s Retirement Savings Account—owned by the worker, regulated by law, and paid out to the worker later. Under Nigeria’s contributory pension framework, the employee contribution is commonly 8% (with an employer minimum contribution alongside it).

    Likewise, national health insurance contributions/premiums are risk-pooling payments for defined health coverage, not a general revenue levy; and (crucially) they are among the items treated as deductions in personal income tax computations.

    So when someone frames pension/health insurance as “proof the poor are being taxed,” they are committing a category error:

    • A deduction is not a tax.

    • A contribution you own (pension) is not a levy you lose.

    • A premium that buys coverage is not a payment for “government enjoyment.”

    If anything, the presence of these deductions is evidence of an attempt—however imperfect—to avoid taxing the portion of income being set aside for welfare/insurance.

    2) The decisive arithmetic the essay avoids: the N800,000 tax-free threshold

    Under the new regime described in multiple reputable summaries, the first ₦800,000 of annual income is taxed at 0%.

    That is not a footnote. That is the hinge.

    Now apply it to “Joseph”:

    Monthly income: N75,000

    • Annual income: N75,000 × 12 = N900,000

    Under a system where the first N800,000 is taxed at 0%, Joseph is not “squarely inside” some punitive bracket. He is N100,000 above the zero band.

    Even before deductions, the portion potentially exposed to tax is N100,000 per year.

    If the next band is taxed at 15% (as these summaries indicate), then Joseph’s gross annual PIT exposure is:

    • N100,000 × 15% = N15,000 per year

    • N1,250 per month

    Now add pension:

    If Joseph contributes pension at 8% (even using the essay’s own assumption), that is:

    • 8% × N900,000 = N72,000 in pension contributions annually (simplified)

    That reduces the portion above N800,000 from N100,000 to N28,000. Tax becomes:

    • N28,000 × 15% = N4,200 per year

    • N350 per month

    And if Joseph also has any deductible health insurance contribution (which many formal arrangements do), he can easily fall below N800,000 taxable income, making his PIT zero.

    What this means

    The essay’s “public U-turn” story is not proof that “the poor will pay tax.”

    It is proof that the narrator’s demonstration did not apply the actual threshold structure that defines liability.

    That is not logic. That is stage-managed arithmetic.

    3) The poverty-line move: a PPP concept misused as a nominal naira salary cut-off

    The essay claims a World Bank “poverty line” of $4.20/day and then converts it into a naira monthly salary figure using a simple exchange conversion to get “N190,000 per month.”

    Read Also: Tax Reforms Act: Groups name speaker Tajudeen Abbas as Man of the Year

    But the World Bank’s $4.20 line is reported in PPP terms (international dollars), not a naira-at-market-exchange salary threshold you can convert with casual FX math.

    So the statement “everyone earning below N190,000/month is poor” is not an “irrefutable fact.” It is a conversion shortcut that swaps a technical welfare metric for a political talking point.

    Even more: the World Bank updated global poverty lines in 2025 (with new PPP bases), which reinforces that these lines are statistical constructs, not the kind of direct nominal wage threshold the essay pretends they are.

    4) “Widen the tax base” does not logically mean “tax the poor”

    The essay’s claim is:

    “The rich are already taxed, so widening must reach downward.”

    That is a false syllogism.

    “Widening the tax base” can mean (among other things):

    • moving non-compliant high earners into compliance

    • closing loopholes and leakages

    • capturing parts of the digital and informal-but-affluent economy

    • improving employer withholding integrity

    • reducing avoidance via better administration

    Nigeria’s revenue problem is not “the poor escaping.” Nigeria’s problem is a historically weak tax-to-GDP ratio and heavy reliance on borrowing; tax reforms have been publicly framed as part of reversing that.

    So “widening” does not necessarily mean “drag subsistence wages into the net.” It often means: make the system catch who already should be paying.

    5) The emotional overload: corruption lists are not an argument against the structure of a tax schedule

    The essay spends pages listing possible misuses of public funds (A–Z). Some may be legitimate governance concerns, but they do not prove the specific claim being sold: “This tax takes money from the poor.”

    If your target is accountability, the rational conclusion is not “therefore don’t tax.” The rational conclusion is:

    • ring-fence, publish, and audit collections;

    • improve transparency of allocation;

    • tighten procurement;

    • prosecute leakage;

    • strengthen citizen oversight—using the legitimacy that taxation creates.

    Historically, broad-based taxation has often strengthened demands for representation and accountability (“no taxation without representation” is not a slogan of lending institutions; it is a logic of citizen-state bargaining). The essay flips that logic on its head by implying that lenders fear Nigerians paying taxes because taxes would empower citizens. That is not an argument; it is a narrative device.

    Meanwhile, Nigeria’s borrowing constraints are real, and a reform agenda that reduces debt-dependence is not “indifference”; it is sovereignty through solvency.

    Proof-by-proof: what the essay is doing (and why it misleads)

    Deception 1: Re-labelling deductions as “taxes”

    • Pension/health insurance are framed as “proof of taxation.”

    • In reality, they are welfare-linked contributions and deductions that reduce taxable income.

    Deception 2: Ignoring the 0% band

    • The N800,000 annual tax-free threshold is the central fact.

    • Without it, the story can manufacture outrage at N75,000/month.

    Deception 3: PPP poverty line converted as if it were a salary threshold

    • $4.20/day is PPP-based and not meant for naïve FX-to-naira monthly wage claims.

    Deception 4: False dilemma

    • “Only three possibilities: the poor, livestock, or ghosts.”

    • Serious tax administration realities are ignored to force a punchline.

    Deception 5: Moral indictment substituted for computation

    • A–Z allegations create heat, not proof.

    • Even if every allegation were true, it still wouldn’t change the tax schedule math.

    The bottom line

    If you want to disagree “most vehemently and logically,” this is the clean core:

    1. The new structure explicitly shields low incomes via a large zero-rated band.

    2. Pension and health insurance deductions are welfare design features, not stealth taxation.

    3. The essay’s outrage depends on omitting the very thresholds and concepts (PPP) that make its conclusion collapse.

    • Yakubu is Director-General, Budget Office of the Federation
  • Banks, government dispel fears as new tax reporting rules take effect

    Banks, government dispel fears as new tax reporting rules take effect

    Banks are playing a central role in supporting the Federal Government’s implementation of the new tax laws, which took effect on January 1, by sensitising customers on the implications for their businesses and personal finances. As key actors in policy execution, lenders have begun explaining changes to the Electronic Money Transfer Levy—now redesignated as Stamp Duty—and outlining new reporting obligations. Under the framework, banks are required to file quarterly reports on accounts that meet turnover thresholds of ₦25 million for individuals and ₦100 million for corporate entities. Analysts say the early adoption of these measures by banks signals growing confidence in the new tax system, reports Assistant Editor COLLINS NWEZE

    Taxation sits at the heart of economic development. Across the world, most advanced economies owe their fiscal stability and institutional strength to tax systems that are broad-based, predictable, and efficiently administered. Revenue mobilisation, when done well, provides governments with the capacity to invest in infrastructure, social services, and economic growth without excessive borrowing.

    For Nigeria, however, taxation for many years fell short of this ideal. The country’s tax-to-GDP ratio remained among the lowest globally, reflecting weak revenue mobilisation and structural inefficiencies. Businesses grappled with multiple taxes and overlapping authorities, while individuals faced levies that often appeared to tax poverty, capital, and investment rather than productivity. Many tax laws were outdated, ambiguous, and poorly aligned with modern economic realities, creating uncertainty and discouraging compliance.

    It was the need to reverse this trend that informed the Federal Government’s sweeping tax reforms. On June 26, 2025, President Bola Tinubu signed into law four interconnected Tax Reform Acts, which became effective from January 1, 2026. Collectively, the reforms represent one of the most ambitious overhauls of Nigeria’s tax architecture in decades. At the centre of the reforms is the Nigeria Tax Act (NTA), a unified statute that consolidates over a dozen legacy federal tax laws, including the Companies Income Tax Act, Personal Income Tax Act, and Value Added Tax Act. By harmonising previously fragmented frameworks, the NTA seeks to simplify compliance, reduce duplication, and improve transparency for taxpayers and administrators.

    The financial sector has begun adjusting to the new regime. In separate notices to customers, United Bank for Africa (UBA), Wema Bank, Polaris Bank, and others confirmed the commencement of the NTA and outlined key changes affecting everyday transactions. In a joint-style advisory, UBA, GTBank and Wema Bank informed customers: “Please be informed that the New Tax Act (NTA) 2025 will take effect on January 1, 2026. Under this Act, the N50 Electronic Money Transfer Levy (EMTL) on money transfers will now be referred to as Stamp Duty across all financial institutions.”

    The banks explained that Stamp Duty now applies to transactions of N10,000 and above or their equivalent in other currencies, while salary payments and intra-bank self-transfers are exempt. Crucially, “the sender now bears the Stamp Duty charge. Previously, this charge was deducted from the beneficiary or receiver,” the notice stated. Beyond transaction levies, the reforms introduce significant changes to personal income taxation. Zenith Bank described the new regime as a shift toward a more progressive and transparent system that directly affects workers’ take-home pay. “Nigeria has entered a new phase of tax administration following the Federal Government’s approval of a revised personal income tax structure, effective January 2026,” Zenith Bank said. “The reform is part of a broader effort by the Tinubu administration to strengthen fiscal capacity, improve revenue mobilisation and reduce over-reliance on volatile oil proceeds.”

    One of the most notable provisions is the exemption of low-income earners. Zenith Bank told customers that individuals earning N800,000 or less annually are now fully exempt from personal income tax. It also highlighted the introduction of rent relief, noting that “20 percent of annual rent paid, subject to a maximum of N500,000, has replaced the Consolidated Relief Allowance.”

    Read Also: Filmmaker Chinneylove dismisses Lily Perez’s plagiarism allegations

    On global income taxation, the bank clarified that under the NTA, income earned by Nigerian residents is taxable in Nigeria regardless of where it arises. “Income, gains or profits of a Nigerian resident are considered to accrue in Nigeria and are taxed as such, whether or not the income has been brought into or received in the country,” it said, adding that non-residents remain taxable only on Nigerian-sourced income. The Act also provides relief against double taxation. “The NTA allows relief for income already taxed outside Nigeria but chargeable locally,” Zenith Bank noted.

    Perhaps the most far-reaching change is the restructuring of income tax bands. “The new regime restructures personal income tax bands to reflect current earnings realities and broaden the taxable base,” the bank said. While income up to N800,000 remains exempt, earnings between N800,000 and N3 million are taxed at 15 percent, and income between N3 million and N12 million at 18 percent. “Earnings above N12 million move into higher progressive tiers,” Zenith Bank explained. “This approach is common in advanced and emerging economies and is aimed at strengthening Nigeria’s fiscal space while preserving fairness.”

    Benefits to the economy

    Zenith Bank explained that beyond individual pay slips, the reform supports the Federal Government’s wider objective of enhancing non-oil revenue. Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio remains significantly below that of peer economies, limiting the ability of government to fund infrastructure, social services, and investment in productive sectors. “A more efficient and progressive personal income tax framework broadens the revenue pool and strengthens fiscal resilience. For the banking industry, a more predictable tax system contributes to macroeconomic stability. Improved public revenues can support fiscal consolidation efforts, shape investor confidence, and sustain better credit conditions. Institutional planning also benefits from clarity in payroll-associated costs, enabling HR and finance teams to forecast compensation budgets more accurately,” it said.

    Understanding the bank report fillings

    Commercial banks have been directed to file reports on bank accounts with N25 million quarterly turnover and above to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) or other related agencies for effective tax monitoring. Chairman of the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee, Mr. Taiwo Oyedele, broke the news yesterday during a media workshop on the new consolidated tax law held in Lagos. He said the directive aligns with the federal government’s new tax administration framework starting January 1, 2026.

    Addressing the misconception that banks will begin reporting all transactions, Oyedele said the 2020 Finance Act already required accounts used for business to have a Tax Identification Number (TIN). He added that the new reform even raises the threshold for mandatory reporting from N10 million to N25 million, which he said translates to “almost N100 million a year before any report is triggered.”

    Oyedele said only accounts that meet the turnover threshold will be indentified and monitored for proper tax payment. He further stated that that banks will be required to request a Tax Identification Number (TIN) from all taxable Nigerians in line with the new tax regime.

    According to him, Section 4 of the Nigerian Tax Administration Act, makes the possession of a tax ID mandatory for all taxable individuals. He clarified that the requirement does not apply to students or dependents, who will be exempted from needing a tax ID to maintain a bank account. He however, said there was no need for anxiety over possibility of banks directly debiting customers’ accounts over tax matters. Oyedele said: “Nobody will debit your bank accounts in banks. Banks will not debit customers’ accounts for tax default”.

    He dismissed allegations that government plans to deduct money directly from bank accounts of taxpayers, insisting that such claims are “false, dangerous and capable of destabilising the economy.” He said the speculations on social media were based on ignorance and deliberate misinformation. “Let me say this clearly: nobody — not FIRS, not Central Bank of Nigeria, not any government agency — has the power to debit your bank account,” he declared. “Whether you have N50,000 or N50 million, nobody is taking any money from your account. It is simply not true.”

    Oyedele explained that the allegation arose from the consolidation of major tax statutes into a single code, which led many to assume that the government had introduced new enforcement powers. He clarified that the only existing mechanism that allows recovery of unpaid taxes is a court-ordered garnishee, which he described as “a long legal process that is almost never used.”

    Views from stakeholders

    President, Bank Customers Association of Nigeria (BCAN), Dr. Uju Ogubunka, said taxation should be based on income. He said that as a finance expert and consultant, transactions that are not based on income should not be taxed. He expects government to properly educate the people on what should be taxed, to avoid fears and panic that would lead many businesses to operate underground and report nothing. “I think that across the world, what is usually taxed is income and not turnover. If you push businesses into believing that a lot of their resources will be taxed, they are likely to operate underground, and ensure that not much of their funds pass through the banks.

    He said that tax authorities should educate retirees on what the tax policy entails, whether retirement funds should be taxed, unless there are proceeds from established businesses. Ogubunka said the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has spent years pushing for financial inclusion, and a badly implemented tax policy could hurt such achievements. He said: “The tax authorities should look out for justifiable income and tax it. They cannot tax anything that is not earned, or capital for businesses. Once these lines are not crossed, I see business compliance rising and economy better for it.” He said a badly implemented tax policy could reduce businesses transaction in banks, and that will not impact positively on the economy.

    President/Chairman of Council, the Chartered Institute of Taxation of Nigeria (CITN), Innocent Ohagwa, said CITN’s concern as the pre- eminent tax institution in Nigeria  is in ensuring that due legislative process is observed and not breached,  especially in respect of an important subject matter as taxation, which thrives on exactitude of tax legislation. He said that integrity of the tax process will command respect, and enhance compliance, adding that no efforts should be spared in getting it right from the onset to avoid overwhelming challenges in the future.

    He said that tax authorities should strive to ensure that any observed discrepancies, whether arising from procedural lapses, administrative errors, or unauthorized alterations in the tax policy is corrected. Ohagwa insisted that the integrity of the legislative process is fundamental to the rule of law, good governance, and public confidence in democratic institutions. “Tax legislation, in particular, requires the highest level of accuracy, transparency, and procedural fidelity due to its far-reaching implications for government revenue, businesses, professionals, and citizens,” he said.

  • Tinubu’s tax reforms critical to Nigeria’s long-term economic stability — Osun APC leader 

    Tinubu’s tax reforms critical to Nigeria’s long-term economic stability — Osun APC leader 

    A leader of All Progressives Congress(APC) in Osun State, Chief Ayodeji Olaiya, has lauded President Bola Tinubu over the implementation of the tax reform in 2026, saying “step is critical to Nigeria’s long-term economic stability.”

    The APC leader from Osun Central Senatorial District in his New Year message added that the economic reforms are poised to bring prosperity and a brighter future.

    Olaiya congratulated Nigerians on the successful completion of the year 2025, describing it as a period marked by resilience, collective sacrifice and renewed national hope. 

    He noted that 2026 comes with strong prospects for stability, growth, and improved governance across the country with the reforms of President Tinubu. 

    According to him, “Despite economic and social challenges encountered in the outgone year, Nigerians remained steadfast and optimistic, demonstrating faith in the nation’s democratic institutions.”

    He commended President Tinubu for initiating far-reaching tax reforms, which he described as bold, strategic, and critical to Nigeria’s long-term economic stability.

    He said, “The tax reform initiatives would, in the long run, expand the tax base, promote fairness, encourage compliance, and reduce overreliance on borrowing. The reforms would empower government to invest more effectively in infrastructure, education, healthcare and social welfare programmes.

    “Our president deserves commendation for his bold tax reform initiatives. These reforms are strategic and long overdue and they are aimed at correcting structural weaknesses in our economic and revenue systems. When fully implemented, the tax reforms will transform the economy, improve transparency, and provide government with the resources needed to deliver critical infrastructure and social services to Nigerians.”

    Speaking on the political direction of Osun State, Olaiya urged citizens and residents to support the candidature of Asiwaju Munirudeen Bola Oyebamiji (AMBO) ahead of the August 8, 2026 governorship election.

    He described Oyebamiji as a seasoned administrator with the capacity to deliver people-oriented governance and sustain progressive ideals in the state.

  • Borderless Paycheck: The Changing Tax Landscape for Digital Nomads

    Borderless Paycheck: The Changing Tax Landscape for Digital Nomads

    The shift to remote work, accelerated by global events, has catalyzed the growth of the Digital Nomad phenomenon—individuals who leverage technology to work untethered from a fixed office location. In response, dozens of countries have launched specialized Digital Nomad Visas, attempting to attract high-earning foreign talent to stimulate local economies. While these visas solve the immigration puzzle, they simultaneously introduce a profound, complex challenge in the realm of taxation.

    For the modern global worker, the borderless nature of work often collides head-on with archaic, territorial tax laws that determine fiscal obligations based on physical presence. Navigating this evolving landscape requires acute awareness of residency rules, which are far more complex than simply where one chooses to live.

    This changing tax landscape demands that mobile professionals, including those working for global digital platforms such as https://nvcasino-pl.pl/pl, treat tax planning as a continuous, critical element of their lifestyle.

    📜 The 183-Day Rule: A Simplistic Fiction

    The most common misconception among digital nomads is the belief that the “183-day rule” is the sole determinant of tax residency. The rule states that if an individual spends more than half the year (183 days) in a country, they become a tax resident there. However, the reality is far more complex:

    • Global income principle. Most developed countries (like the US, Canada, and many EU states) tax residents on their worldwide income, regardless of where it was earned. Becoming a tax resident in one place means reporting all global income to that authority.
    • The “center of vital interests” test. Tax authorities often use a multi-factor test to determine an individual’s “true” tax home. This often supersedes the 183-day rule and considers factors such as:
      • Where your family resides (spouse, minor children).
      • Where your primary bank accounts, property, and professional ties are located.
      • Where your most significant economic and social relationships are maintained.
    • Source of income. Some countries tax income based on its source. If the work is being performed while physically present in the country, that income may be subject to local taxation, even if the worker is not a full tax resident.

    The 183-day rule is a dangerously simplistic fiction for digital nomads. Tax residency is ultimately determined by the comprehensive “center of vital interests” test and the global income principle, meaning that simply counting days is insufficient and the location of family, assets, and economic ties usually dictates where worldwide income must be reported and taxed.

    🛂 Digital Nomad Visas: Immigration Relief, Tax Ambiguity

    Digital Nomad Visas (DNVs) successfully grant the right to live and work remotely in a country, but they are often silent or ambiguous on tax residency.

    • The lure of zero tax. Some DNVs offer initial tax incentives, such as a temporary exemption from local income tax (e.g., specific residency programs in Portugal or Georgia). This is the biggest draw for tax optimization.
    • The tax trap. If a nomad retains their primary “Center of Vital Interests” in their home country (e.g., the US or Germany), they may still be liable for full global taxation there, regardless of the DNV’s temporary local exemption. This creates a risk of Double Taxation—being liable for tax in two countries on the same income.
    • The compliance burden. A digital nomad must accurately track physical presence (using calendar apps, flight data, etc.) to prove they have broken tax residency ties with their home country while simultaneously establishing legal residency in the host country.

    While Digital Nomad Visas (DNVs) solve the immigration legality problem, they often fail to solve the tax legality problem. The most significant risk for the DNV holder is not the local tax (which is sometimes exempted), but the potential for Double Taxation on worldwide income if they do not successfully sever their “Center of Vital Interests” from their high-tax home country, requiring complex compliance and invocation of Double Taxation Treaties (DTTs).

    ⚖️ Mitigation and Compliance Strategy

    To navigate this complex environment, digital nomads must adopt a proactive strategy focused on breaking old ties and establishing new, legally recognizable ones.

    1. Breaking ties. This involves severing the “Center of Vital Interests” in the home country: selling property, cancelling utility bills, relinquishing driver’s licenses, and moving family members.
    2. Utilizing double taxation treaties (DTTs). Nomads must understand if their host country and their home country have a DTT and, if so, which nation takes precedence under the treaty’s “tie-breaker rules.” This is a complex legal process requiring professional advice.
    3. Professional advice. Relying solely on internet forums for tax advice is highly risky. Due to the high penalties for international tax evasion, nomads should consult specialized cross-border tax advisors before moving.

    Digital Nomad Visas signal an exciting shift toward greater global work flexibility, but they do not eliminate the complexities of fiscal responsibility. For the borderless worker, tax residency is now a primary, ongoing compliance challenge that requires meticulous record-keeping and strategic planning to avoid costly double taxation. The future of remote work depends on the willingness of governments to update their tax codes to accommodate a mobile workforce, but until then, the burden of compliance rests squarely on the shoulders of the nomad. Are you certain your current travel pattern does not classify you as a tax resident in multiple jurisdictions?

  • Group moves to boost tax compliance, trains Enugu revenue officers on grievance redress

    Group moves to boost tax compliance, trains Enugu revenue officers on grievance redress

    The Hope Givers Initiative (HOG-I) on Wednesday trained officers of the Enugu State Internal Revenue Service (ESIRS) on effective management of taxpayers’ complaints, as part of efforts to strengthen transparency, accountability and voluntary tax compliance in the state.

    The capacity-building workshop followed an assessment which revealed gaps in Enugu State’s grievance redress mechanism, particularly in the areas of documentation, tracking and timely resolution of tax-related complaints.

    Speaking at the event, Onyeka Udeghunam of HOG-I said the programme was designed to strike a balance between tax sensitisation and citizens’ rights to question assessments and demand value for money.

    “People should not just be told to pay tax. They must understand why they are paying and also know where to lodge complaints if they disagree with an assessment. Government, on its part, is expected to respond within a specific timeframe,” she said.

    Read Also: Banditry will be defeated in 2026, Akpabio assures Nigerians

    Udeghunam stressed that tax payments must translate into visible public services, noting that traders who pay market taxes deserve basic amenities such as water supply, toilets and good access roads.

    Also speaking, the Programme Lead of the Tax Justice and Governance Platform, Sadiq Mohammed Mustapha, described the training as timely, especially as states prepare to align with new national tax reforms expected to take effect in January 2026.

    He disclosed that Enugu State scored 10 out of 16 in a recent assessment, reflecting progress in automation, but noted lingering gaps in digitalisation, data collection and the institutionalisation of complaint-handling systems.

    “We helped bridge some of these gaps by developing a standard operating procedure, a complaints-tracking dashboard and performance indicators that will enable the service to measure efficiency and improve its relationship with taxpayers,” Mustapha said.

    In his remarks, Okey Onyeka of Civil Rights Concern said effective handling of tax complaints is critical to improving compliance and boosting government revenue.

    According to him, when taxpayers see their grievances promptly addressed, trust in the system grows, compliance improves and the government is better positioned to deliver services through the budget process.