Tag: Terrorism

  • Speaker Dogara, Bruce, Others to Brainstorm on Terrorism and Human Rights

    Speaker Dogara, Bruce, Others to Brainstorm on Terrorism and Human Rights

    Speaker, House of Representatives, Hon. Yakubu Dogara and Senator Ben Bruce have been nominated to join other international speakers and stakeholders in continuation of efforts to curb activities and impact of terrorism in Nigeria in a seminar put together by a civil society organisation: Save Humanity Advocacy Centre (SHAC).

    The seminar tagged, “Global War Against Terrorism: For Nigeria, A Choice Between Law and Life”, is expected to add impetus and proffer solution to Nigeria’s commitment to getting rid of terrorism and its impact on her national life.
    Addressing a press conference in Abuja on Tuesday, the Executive Secretary of SHAC, Ibrahim Abubakar explained that the seminar has become imperative in view of some subjective assessment done on the fight against terror by the organized force in Nigeria, adding that there was a need for collective and objective assessment of the war.
    Abubakar stressed that SHAC has spent quality time over the years monitoring crisis situations across the country and in recent years concentrated both in the North and south-eastern part of the country.
    “In the course of our work, we have noted that ongoing conflicts across the world have been assessed with such worrying relativity that the issues are easily confused. The standards for evaluation are dangerously fluid and definitions constantly shift depending on who is doing the evaluation, who is being evaluated and where the evaluation is taking place.
    “With Nigeria and the Boko Haram terror group, this kind of subjective assessment of the crisis situation has proven to be out-rightly dangerous and sometimes purely irresponsible when viewed against the greater responsibility to humanity, which is safeguarding the wellbeing of local populations that are the victims of terror attacks. The legitimate authorities – military and security agencies that are saddled with curtailing these terrorists are now branded as if they are the ones committing crimes when in reality they are the ones preventing further carnage against the innocent civilian populations.

    SHAC Executive Secretary maintained that the attempt sometimes to make military and security personnel fighting Boko Haram and other threats to the sovereignty of Nigeria appear like criminals is often hidden behind acceptable global standards for human rights observance by military and law enforcement agencies but noted that there were a lot of greyness on what the standards are as they tend to take on different definitions while acquiring new details where Nigeria is involved.

    He said it was in the light of the damage the crisis has brought on the land and the views expressed with a view to thwarting the efforts of the government to end the menace that the seminar is planned to attempt in correcting the ills.
    “It is therefore imperative that the issues around humanitarian and human rights issues are better articulated to put both practitioners and citizens in a better position to understand what is at stake. This is why the Save Humanity Advocacy Centre (SHAC) is organizing a two-day seminar that will assemble stakeholders to interrogate the issues and proffer useful suggestions on how to proceed in the times ahead.”
    According to SHAC, participants are drawn from Nigeria and abroad to cover those working in crisis management, academics, judiciary and NGOs. These participants boast a collection of people that have proven pivotal in shaping how Nigeria is perceived.
    The Seminar will take place between Wednesday December 13th and Thursday December 14th 2017 at the Shehu Yar’Adua Centre, Abuja.

  • TELCOS terrorism

    Have you ever been on the highway driving home after a dog’s day at work and your phone rings? You peek at it. It’s an unknown number and you ignore it. It rings off and rings again. You take another look; again an unknown number but a rather peculiar one. It’s a ‘mature’ number as a friend of Hardball would term it: In the sense that it belongs to the first or second generation series of numbers.

    And it keeps ringing relentlessly as if you are about to miss a major job if you ignored it. You reach out and manage to pick it and put it on speaker; disregarding the traffic code against fiddling with the phone while driving. And what do you get? A recording – someone desperately trying to sell you something.

    Gosh! Your brains literally explodes in ire and you reach out quickly to shut down the irritant; you miss with the first jab and the second … your car swerves a little. You ignore the phone; reclaim your wheels as the promo continues to rant searingly running its full course. Now you are probably boiling over and cursing furiously under your breath. You feel so thoroughly ravaged and your blood pressure may have gone up one notch.

    There are as many scenarios as there are GSM phone users in Nigeria. The telecommunications companies have grown from feeding frenzy on us their helpless game to the realms of terrorism. When this ravenously bad habit started about four years ago, it was enough to stay with those text-and-win promos.

    You must remember that crazy era when some of the telcos offered SUVs and millions of naira to be won if you recharged. That epoch ended when one of the firms lost its mind and offered us an aeroplane. RECHARGE-AND-WIN-AN-AEROPLANE was the promo that ‘killed’ all promos. The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) eventually got shame-faced enough to snap from its slumber and tried to moderate the madness.

    No sleek-fingered telco has offered us a Concorde jet ever since but they have not stopped pecking at us like vultures upon a dying game. Hardball chose to keep his treasure of short messages from his service providers and in just one month of August, he got no fewer than 100 messages from each of the three lines he uses. The barrage of messages is a curious admixture of picking my pockets and obtaining by all manner of unscrupulous guises.

    Here are a few examples: Dateline August 11, 2016, time 20:33: Dear customer, you have successfully subscribed to MTNsports EPL and N50.00 deducted from your account. Your service will be renewed on 2016-08-18. To cancel, text stop EPL to 5836. Enjoy!

    One never remembered subscribing to the above and even if perchance I had been tricked into it as they are wont to do these days, I never received one word of information on the EPL game.

    But every week one gets the notification for renewal and deduction of N50.00. This is just one example. There are so many more from all the firms.

    If this is not criminality bordering on terrorism, then what is it?

     

  • Nigeria, Turkey to strengthen security against terrorism

    Nigeria, Turkey to strengthen security against terrorism

    President Muhammadu Buhari and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan have agreed, after talks, on Thursday in Ankara to strengthen cooperation between the security agencies of both countries to counter terrorism.

    Speaking at a joint press conference after a tete-a-tete with his host, President Buhari said he was ‘‘very pleased’’ that the defence ministers of both countries held extensive discussions on developing new strategies for counter-terrorism.

    In a statement by the Senior Special Assistant on Media and publicity, Garba Shehu, the President said ‘‘We are very pleased with the progress of the meeting so far and we are going to wait for the details of meetings between the two countries.

    ‘‘We will as a result of the meeting between the ministers and officials of both countries strengthen rapidly whatever their recommendations are,’’ the President said.

    Commenting on the degradation of Boko Haram in Nigeria, President Buhari said the improved security situation in the North East was an eloquent testimony to the efforts of his administration in combating terrorism since he came into office in May 2015

    He said ‘‘We were very surprised and disturbed by the claim made by Boko Haram on what they have been getting from ISIS.

    ‘‘We know we will be able to contain them and we have proven that we can do it.

    ‘‘We are very pleased that Turkey is in a position to assist us and has been strengthening our educational and health institutions,’’ President Buhari said.

    The President said the two leaders also discussed the prospects of increasing their bilateral trade, which has exceeded 779 million USD in the first eight months of 2017.

    ‘‘There are a lot of potentialities in terms of investments and a lot is being done in the educational and health sectors in Nigeria.

    ‘‘These will be strengthened and I assure you that Nigeria is prepared to accept Turkish business people to come and explore more of Nigeria’s potentialities,’’ the Nigerian leader said.

    In his remarks, Erdogan said Nigeria had great potentials and remains “a global actor in terms of economy, demographics and its peacekeeping records.”

    He indicated that Turkey was interested in investing in Nigeria’s electricity, refineries and gas sectors, adding that increasing the flights between Turkey and Nigeria would further improve commercial and people-to-people relationships.

    On the fight against terrorism, the Turkish leader said: ‘‘there is no difference between Boko Haram, Fethullah Terrorist Organisation or Daesh (ISIS), which have all killed, inflicted pain and hardship on innocent people.

    ‘‘All of these organisations are hordes of murderers that feed on the innocent people, and in the fight against terrorism, we will stand with our Nigerian friends, and we are ready to share our experience and provide all kinds of support.

    ‘‘We also expect the same cooperation from Nigeria in fighting against Fethullah that murdered 250 Turkish citizens last year,’’ he said.

    Read Also: Photo: Buhari in Turkey

  • Saraki urges collective fight against terrorism

    Saraki urges collective fight against terrorism

    Senate President Bukola Saraki, says it is the collective responsibility of world leaders to combat terrorism, reaffirming Nigeria’s commitment to the fight.

    Saraki said this during bilateral meeting with the Speaker of the Parliament of Iran, Ali, Larijani, at the 137th Inter-Parliamentary Union Assembly in St. Petersburg, Russia on Monday.

    The senate president said time has come for all world leaders to join forces to eliminate “the greatest enemy”.

    He said,“ there must be a common goal and direction in the fight against terrorism. The fight against terrorism is the responsibility of all leaders as it is the greatest enemy that we all have.

    “When we were younger, the world was not at this level in the fight against terrorism, so we owe the generations after us the duty to do our best to eradicate it.

    “We must all work closely against this common enemy”.

    On bilateral relation with Iran in the area of oil and gas, Saraki said there was a need to develop a strong relationship for mutual benefits of both countries.

    Read Also: I’m not grooming my son to become governor –Saraki

    He emphasised the importance of collaboration and exchange of ideas between both countries to be able to do more business in the oil and gas sector.

    On parliamentary relationship, Bukola said the meeting was a step towards establishing such relationship.

    “I know that your embassy in Nigeria is very active. I have met with your ambassador a couple of times and he is doing very well.

    “I hope that after we go back, we can encourage a closer relationship between the parliaments,’’ he said.

    He thanked Larijani for the opportunity of the meeting, while expressing optimism that there would be more similar meetings to strengthen the relationship between the Nigerian parliament and the Iranian parliament.

    Earlier, the Iranian speaker Ali Larijani said he called for the meeting to be able to establish a relationship with the Nigerian parliament.

    He also reiterated the need for concerted effort by heads of states in the fight against terrorism in view of its escalating nature.

    On Nigeria, Iran relation, the speaker said “both countries need to find ways of expanding both trade and parliamentary relations.’’

    He assured of Iran’s readiness to develop a relationship with Nigeria in the area of oil and gas and other beneficial areas.

    He extended an invitation to Saraki to visit Iran as a step towards consolidating the relationship between both parliaments.

  • Buhari urges stronger ties to end terrorism

    Buhari urges stronger ties to end terrorism

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Thursday urged world leaders to strengthen relationships across borders and ensure intelligence sharing in order to curb the growing sophistication in global terrorism.

    He made the call while receiving the Egyptian Ambassador to Nigeria, Aseem Muhammed Hanafi Elseify, at the State House, Abuja.

    According to a statement issued by his Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, President Buhari said recent attacks in United Kingdom and other developed nations, clearly showed a need for stronger global collaboration and review of security architectures across countries.

    The President noted that the Boko Haram attacks within West African countries and across the borders were brought under control after concerted efforts by leaders to ensure joint operations.

    “Clearly the threat of global terrorism is getting more sophisticated by the day so we need leaders to work together to stop the attacks,’’ he said.

    President Buhari said bilateral relations between Nigeria and Egypt in education, training and trade had been historical, urging the new ambassador to work towards expanding and deepening the scope of the relationship.

    In his remarks, the envoy said building partnership to tackle the security challenges faced by both countries would be one of his priorities.

     

     

     

     

     

  • Jordan gives Nigeria 200 armoured vehicles to battle terrorism

    President Muhammadu Buhari on Tuesday in New York lauded the Kingdom of Jordan for the donation of hardware in support of Nigeria’s campaign against terrorism and insurgency.

    Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity Femi Adesina stated this in a statement yesterday.

    He quoted the President as making the commendation at a bilateral meeting with King Abdullah II of Jordan on the sideline of the 72nd Session of the United Nations General Assembly.

    Adesina said the President was delighted with the pledge by the Jordanian government to further supply helicopters to Nigeria.

    Buhari said: “The very expensive donation of about 200 Armoured Fighting Vehicles reflects true concern for Nigeria’s security situation and genuine goodwill towards a friendly nation.”

    The presidential aide said Buhari also reassured the King of Nigeria’s commitment towards the proposed Aqaba Process with countries in the region.

    Aqaba is the only coastal city in Jordan and the largest and most populous city on the Gulf of Aqaba

    ”Nigeria is willing to play a leading role in bringing together countries in the West African sub-region into this collective security arrangement.”

    He said the President pledged Nigeria’s continued desire for enhanced bilateral ties with the kingdom.

    The Jordanian King informed Buhari that his government was in the process of opening an embassy in Abuja in the next few months.

    He expressed appreciation over the support being extended to his country by the Nigerian government in this regard.

    He told Buhari that his National Security Adviser (NSA) would soon be working out the finer details of the Aqaba Process with his Nigerian counterpart.

    The President was accompanied to the bilateral meeting, the third of its kind since the inception of the current administration, by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr. Geoffrey Onyeama and the NSA, Maj-Gen. Babagana Monguno (rtd).

    Nigeria’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations Prof. Tijjani Bande also attended the meeting.

    These gestures were aimed at enhancing Nigeria’s operational capabilities in the fight against terror both within the country and the Lake Chad Basin.

    The security situation in Nigeria affects neighbouring Cameroon, Chad and Niger, where the Multinational Joint Task Force is engaging the Boko Haram insurgents and terrorists.

    The NSA’s second trip to Jordan on the invitation of the King in January 2016 to attend the 3rd Aqaba Process also resulted in a renewed commitment between the two countries to consider multilateral action in confronting the menace of terrorism.

    The Kingdom of Jordan has similar Aqaba arrangement with the East African countries battling protracted terrorist menace.

    Nigeria has agreed to work with countries in the region on a similar arrangement with Jordan.

    “It is anticipated that the first Aqaba Process for Nigeria and sister countries within the sub-region with Jordan will be held in late November or early December 2017,” the statement said.

  • IPOB, Python Dance and terrorism

    IPOB, Python Dance and terrorism

    PRESIDENT Muhammadu Buhari has been listening only to himself and his aides who tell him what he wants to hear. Two weeks ago, this column urged him, in his futile struggles with alienated groups in the country, to listen now and again to his enemies, since he appeared dedicated to making more of them than making friends. But the president is headstrong, and his friends and aides, particularly from his side of the country, take pride in their tunnel vision. The result last week was the launching of Operation Python Dance II, leading to the almost total sequestration of the Southeast. Shortly after President Buhari returned from his medical trip abroad to bad-temperedly give a laconic address to his long-suffering countrymen, this column remarked, among other things, that the president’s advisory team, particularly his security team, was too restricted and insular to be of help to him in complex and demanding situations. Events of the past one week in the Southeast have conclusively proved that the country is in the grip of leaders too stiff and too isolated to shrewdly tackle the looming political storm.

    Operation Python Dance II, obviously inspired by the president’s meeting with his security chiefs two days after his resumption of duty, is designed to crush any plan of rebellion or secession in the country. The president clearly stated what he thought was the problem in the national broadcast in reference. According to him, and perhaps referencing the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and the activities of Nnamdi Kanu without saying so explicitly, any self-determination campaign was a plot for secession, and, in his quaint syllogism, self-determination was next door to war. Having stated the problem so simplistically and so inelegantly, shutting out every nuance and complexity, the president virtually gave the signal, if not direct order, for a military crackdown. He may have mouthed his conversion to democracy — of course not necessarily belief in the concept — but he is at bottom an unapologetic exponent of military rule.

    No problem can be solved until it is first stated carefully and accurately. The Buhari presidency may have a general hunch of the issues that lather the Southeast, but it has not stated the problem clearly and accurately because of its lack of depth, poor reflection and little grounding in the relevant philosophical concepts required to govern Nigeria. What troubles the Southeast and Nigeria is not Mr. Kanu’s gloomy prediction of the country’s fate, nor his hate speech, as indefensible as it is, not yet IPOB’s amateurish and inflammatory approach to self-determination. To suggest irrationally that these are the problems at the core of Nigeria’s existential crisis is to connive at the president’s fulminations against Mr. Kanu and IPOB, as well as to supinely acquiesce to the silly ratiocination that stigmatises and stereotypes the Igbo but conversely and insidiously canonises the president’s ethnic preference.

    It is doubtful whether President Buhari and his advisers can yet be persuaded to take a fresh and more dispassionate look at the problems of Nigeria, and to, as academics insist to every student they teach, learn the art and science of accurately identifying the variables at play in order to properly define a problem. If they can, they will need to be cajoled into recognising that Mr. Kanu is merely the inconsequential public face of a seething national problem, a problem that is dangerously simmering below the surface, waiting for eruption. Sadly, the president has dismissively characterised restructuring as a needless campaign that is best handled by the National Assembly and the National Council of State. He refuses to admit openly that passing the buck to the two bodies was his own way of indicating the extent of his contempt for both the concept and the campaign that energises it. No one in his team has looked him in the face to tell him that his views on those salient issues are anachronistic. But they must find the pluckiness to do it.

    The issues are, in fact, not as mysterious as the president makes them. Restructuring, like the Igbo self-determination campaigns, predates President Buhari’s government and indicates long-running unease with the untenable political and economic structures that stymie productivity, creativity and stability in Nigeria. Despite the president’s frequent restatement of the fallacy that Nigeria operates a federal structure and is united beyond any fresh negotiations, few doubt that the reigning political structure is a unitary system fuelled and riveted by crude oil wealth. Worsening the debate about restructuring is the president’s own lack of savvy in advocating measures to calm feelings of alienation and exclusion. He has assembled a security and paramilitary team that is sectional and religiously coloured, and has also surrounded himself with advisers that are defined by their groupthink and admit of no devil’s advocate. Worse, he has damned complaints and threatened fire and brimstone against agitators responding fretfully and sometimes desultorily to his temperamental approach to security and governance. Apart from the problem of restructuring, the fact on the ground is that President Buhari is not running an inclusive and national government. Why is he, therefore, shocked that the Southeast — despite the advantages they supposedly received from the Goodluck Jonathan government — is up in arms against his insular style of governance?

    In 1966, faced with the crises that followed that year’s January coup and the July counter-coup, the Yakubu Gowon government split the regions into 12 states to take the wind out of the secessionist sail. It was too little too late, but it helped diffuse the reaction to the crises and weaken the opposition to the war efforts. More than five decades later, and faced with an even more potentially destructive crisis, the Buhari presidency has become indefensibly and unwisely inured to the advantages of restructuring a country that is no longer tenably run along unitary lines.

    The president has paranoiacally focused on Mr. Kanu and IPOB without correspondingly feeling unnerved by his close circle of advisers’ political and cultural shibboleths. He is strangely unaffected by the fact that all the measures he has propounded since he returned from medical care abroad have fallen in line principally with the prevailing views from the North. He has not attempted to even pause, let alone ponder, whether there are no other ways of resolving a crisis that is threatening to expand beyond control and consume the whole country. He is not anxious to examine whether more scientific and diplomatic means cannot be found to dissipate the crisis. He has not even convened a genuine meeting of south-eastern leaders and their Young Turks to brainstorm over the problems convulsing the Southeast. At least his compatriot, the late ex-president Umaru Yar’Adua, heeded wise counsel and parlayed with Niger Delta militants to find a lasting solution to the oil region’s crisis.

    What seems to drive President Buhari’s inflexible approach to the Southeast ferment is that he is persuaded by the stereotypes relentlessly drummed into his ears by his narrow circle of advisers and unrepresentative security chiefs. Somehow, they have formed the belief that the Igbo are impulsive, irrational, coarse, troublesome, clannish and aggressively determined to take over the country’s leadership, as exampled by the 1966 coup, to the exclusion of others. There may be some elements of truth in these observations, but is there any ethnic group, including the Hausa/Fulani and the Yoruba, which does not have its own long list of stereotypes? Is there a perfect ethnic group anywhere in the world? Should a brilliant leader not concern himself with finding ways to moderate and mediate the frictions that some of these stereotypes, assuming they are well founded, conjure?

    The Yoruba are denigrated as professional agitators, wily, materialistic and snobbish. They drive other ethnic groups up the wall with their superior airs. After enduring years of contemptuous treatment from the rest of Nigeria shortly before independence, the Hausa/Fulani are dismissed as lazy, neo-colonially minded, uncivilised, fanatical and obsessed with ruling Nigeria as a guarantee of their safety and well-being. Indeed, there is no ethnic group without its own stereotypes, whether true or misleading. It is unhelpful to focus on these so-called stereotypes in determining how to relate with one another. This is why it is urgent to restructure the country in such a manner that no group will feel threatened, discriminated against, or fearful of being dispossessed. Surely, Nigeria can find leaders who can engage themselves cerebrally to find a workable structure.

    Apparently, President Buhari is either too steeped in the ways and habits of the past or secretly harbours too many prejudices and unhelpful leadership idiosyncrasies to be of any help in this matter. Rather than engage the agitators, and forgetting that he kept virtually aloof over more vicious herdsmen terrorism, he feels the constitution — the same constitution he has violated serially — enjoins him, indeed makes it obligatory, to deal ferociously with any agitator. As a result, he has ordered a military crackdown in the Southeast to be executed by the same military battling image problems in the Northeast and elsewhere. Of course, almost immediately, using various pretexts, and egged on by strident voices from the North, soldiers vengefully swooped on the Southeast to inflict brutality upon friends and foes alike. Even harmless journalists were not spared. Yes, IPOB doubtless menaced the public and endangered the polity, but the military descended on the region with a mindset that showed contempt for both the constitution and the people. They seemed to corroborate all that Amnesty International had repeatedly said about their brutal style and total disregard for the rights and liberties of innocent citizens.

    Worse, it is indeed strange that the same North that fought bravely but unconscionably to prevent both the Nigerian government and the United States from declaring Boko Haram a terrorist organisation between 2009 and 2013, despite intensive campaigns by rights groups and the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), eagerly advocated for IPOB to be declared a terrorist organisation in a matter of months. That declaration, which did not witness debates between the various organs of the Nigerian presidency, nor followed the Terrorism Act, 2011 (As amended), was then strangely and unconstitutionally assigned by faceless officials to the military to announce to the public. Southeast governors, perhaps influenced by the fiery but superficial oratory of Governor Rochas Okorocha weeks ago, have cottoned on to the declaration and hastily proscribed IPOB. What that will achieve is not clear. It is obvious that both the federal government and the governors have foreclosed any sensible, peaceful and structural resolution of the deep and underlying problems dislocating the Southeast and other geopolitical zones. How they hope strong-arm tactics would extirpate the political and economic viruses predisposing the Southeast to agitation is hard to understand.

    The Southeast governors who should know where the shoe is pinching their people have an obligation to champion a more scientific approach of identifying the factors causing the crisis. Only then can they attempt to coax the unyielding Buhari presidency into embracing lasting and perhaps permanent solution. Instead they have unwisely surrendered to Abuja’s unreflective and misplaced efforts. Their measures will not work, and will not last. The problem, inexpertly and misguidedly centred on Mr. Kanu and IPOB, despite both being merely the symptomatic manifestations of deeper, structural and more fundamental problems, may temporarily yield to force. But eventually, the volcano will erupt. It always does, regardless of the leadership’s lack of imagination and innovation. The public danger may indeed be very dire and urgent, but it is incredible that soldiers deployed in the Southeast last week found a pretext for the kind of brutality and abuse they executed not only in that region but also in the Northeast during the Boko Haram campaigns.

  • TERRORISM (PREVENTION) ACT, 2011

    1. Proscribed Organisation.

    (1).    Where two or more persons associate for the purpose of or where an organization engages in—

    (a)     Participating or collaborating in an act of terrorism;

    (b)    promoting, encouraging or exhorting others to commit an act of terrorism; or

    (c)     setting up or pursuing acts of terrorism, the judge in Chambers may on an application made by the Attorney General, National Security Adviser or Inspector General of Police on the approval of the President; declare any entity to be a proscribed organization and the notice should be published in official gazette.

    (2)     An order made under sub-section (1) of this section shall be published in the official gazette, in two National newspapers and at such other places as the judge in Chambers may determine.

    (3)     A publication made under sub-section (2) of this section shall contain such relevant particulars as the judge in Chambers may specify:

    (i)      a person who belongs or professes to belong to a proscribed organization commits an offence under this Act and shall on conviction be liable to imprisonment for a maximum term of 20 years;

    (ii)     for the avoidance of doubts, political parties should not be regarded as proscribed organizations and nobody should be treated as such because of his or her political beliefs.

    (4)     It is a defence for a person charged under sub-section (3) of this section to prove that the organization had not been declared a proscribed organization at the time the person charged became or began to profess to be a member of the organization and that he has not taken part in the activities of the organization at any time after it has been declared to be proscribed organization.

    (5)     The Attorney General upon the approval of the President may withdraw the order if satisfied that such proscribed organization has ceased to engage in an act of terrorism—

    (a)     the proscribed organization or person affected by the order made an application on notice; and

    (b)     he is satisfied that a proscribed organization has ceased to engage in the acts specified in sub-section (1) of this section and that there is no likelihood of the organization engaging in such acts in the future and shall be published in the official gazette.

  • Terrorism in Europe: Moroccan connection

    Catalonia is an important part of the kingdom of Spain with separate national aspirations and its capital city of Barcelona is the second biggest city in Spain after Madrid and it is arguably the most beautiful and most cosmopolitan city in Spain. It was once host to the Olympics Games and it is host to the famous football team “Barca”. This is the city and neighboring other two towns that were reeling under terrorist attacks which at the last count have led to more than twenty people dead including some of the terrorists and tens of people seriously wounded. For more than a decade, Spain has been spared of terrorist attack  at least of the Islamic variant. The last time Spain had anything to do with terrorism was the fact that one of those Saudis, named Mohammad Atta, who piloted one of the planes during the 9/11 attack on New York once lived in Spain.

    The Iberian peninsula still known to the Arab world as Andalusia, was for more than five centuries, off and on, either partly or totally under Muslim rule. The most effective period of Muslim rule was when a caliphate existed in the Iberian peninsula from 929 to 1031 and and this was followed by the Almoravid’s (Al murabitun) conquest of Spain from 1031 to 1130. In spite of Christian reconquest of Spain  between 1130 and 1492, the blood of  Moroccan Arabs flow in the veins of many spaniards. Perhaps because of this and the proximity of Spain to Morocco in particular, Muslims particularly from Morocco until recently have always been welcome in Spain.

    Moroccans historically have been tolerant and moderate Muslims who shared with others in the Mediterranean, common cuisine and love for good life of wine and song. Wine is openly consumed in restaurants in the major Moroccan cities of Rabat, Fez, Marrakech and Casablanca. The sharifian dynasty established during the Arab conquest of Morocco  circa 700 to 900  provide a rallying point for the country.  The Sharif or sultan since the 19th century has been a modernizing monarchy perhaps as a surviving strategy in the face of European imperialism. The kingdom likes to see itself as a constitutional monarchy although even today the Moroccan king is still too powerful to fit into the category of constitutional monarchy found elsewhere in places like Spain, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium and Japan. Morocco enjoys political stability unseen in many Arab and North African countries. It attracts because of this, western investment and political and military support. It is a major ally of the United States  in its fight against terrorism. When many Arab regimes were shaken to their foundations during the so-called Arab Spring, Morocco stood like a rock of Gibraltar against salafist jihadists, only making minor political  adjustment to contain demands for reforms.

    The political stability in the kingdom has not translated to economic prosperity and this has led to massive migrations of Moroccans to continental Europe particularly to Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Spain and Germany where they mostly did the jobs such as cleaning the streets, removing of garbage and other low income jobs that the Europeans were not eager to do. Through natural growth, the number of this immigrants has increased exponentially to the point that they have become visible minorities in these European countries to the point where politicians particularly in the Netherlands have exploited their presence for political leverage and support. The cultural divide especially religious divide has made it impossible for the immigrants and their children to be assimilated into the wider European culture. The Moroccans involved in these acts of Islamic terrorism are usually not the immigrants themselves but their children.

    In the same week Moroccans were involved in acts of wanton terrorism in Spain, they also showed up in Finland where an apparently deranged young man killed two women before he was incapacitated and brought down by police bullets on his feet. Finland has never witnessed this kind of terror before until now. A few weeks ago, a young Libyan in Manchester killed scores of young people at a musical concert. Some months earlier, Paris, Brussels, Berlin and Nice in the Mediterranean coast of France were brought to their knees by young Muslims most of who were born in Europe. What is now new since Nice, Berlin  and London is the weapon of choice being employed by these terrorists to inflict maximum casualties. This new weapon is the automobile, either cars or trucks. Vehicles are driven into crowds of people at maximum speed with intention to kill. All the people targeted are innocent people. Be they men or women, children or adults, Christians or Muslims, firm or infirm or black, brown, yellow or white.

    The question to ask is for what purpose? Killing people at random and for no just cause than to attract attention is absolutely senseless and insane and is not in consonance with any Islamic beliefs. Even if these perpetrators of murder are angry with society for any reason,  the terrorism they indulged in is not the way to air their grievances. Unfortunately these people are giving the religion of Islam a bad  name to the effect that innocent Muslims are being tarred with the same brush of terrorism as those of the terrorists.

    What is to be done and who is to blame? One of the fathers of the Moroccan terrorists in Barcelona blamed the Imam of the mosque attended by his two children involved in acts of terrorism who were shot dead as being responsible for indoctrination of his children. Others blame some majority Sunni countries in the Middle East for spreading hate, salafism,wahabbism and fanaticism generally.  There is no doubt that some rich people in the Middle East, driven by more religious enthusiasm than wisdom are funding without control their own brand and interpretation of Islam. We can also point to the failure of society that may have been responsible for alienation of children born in these societies but  who are treated as aliens. There is also the failure of intelligence on the part of security organizations in host countries of the immigrant young people.

    Whatever reasons that may be adduced to explain this recrudescence of terrorism in Spain and other places would still not justify wanton killing of innocent people. Short of turning all centres of major cities into pedestrian area without vehicles allowed in, this problem will persist. Even if motorists were banned from city centres, it is inconceivable to ban them from all city roads which means determined killers can still hunt for their preys. At the end of the day, peace can only be built in human hearts through change of heart, correct teaching of the pillars of whatever faith we hold dear, and through mankind realizing that we are all children of God in spite of whatever apparent physical or religious differences we can identify.

    The immediate consequences of what happened in the weekend of August 17-20 is that Morocco and Moroccans will be stigmatized. I know Moroccans are basically good people. I have personal experience of Moroccans and some friends among  these generally friendly and tolerant people. The economy of the country depends hugely on tourism unlike any Arab country. Morocco is not like any Arab country in fact most of the people are arabised berbers with substantial portion of the population being descendants of African people. Morocco has always looked towards Africa rather than the Middle East and its  Sunni Islam is tempered by history and geography and this makes Morocco unique of the countries in the Maghreb. It is hoped that this time of national infamy will pass and Morocco and Moroccans will come into their own once again.

  • Mr. Osinbajo, shall we now treat ‘hate governance’ as terrorism?

    As Acting President, Yemi Osinbajo mustered a pious parallel to Nigeria’s cult worship of deviltry and vile. But despite his affectation of innate rebellion against the hateful and vile, Nigeria drowns in the flood of his expendable truths.

    Hate speech is terrorism, according to Osinbajo. Thus while his boss, President Muhammadu Buhari, enjoyed medical tourism abroad, and ‘poor’ Nigerians cowed from a vicious health system, the hatred and savage antics of separatists from the north and southeast, Osinbajo ignited the dying embers of his government’s resolve, into a fierce fire.

    As Acting President, Osinbajo spat fire in measured cadence. Perhaps he meant to scald, among other ills, Biafran separatist and hatemonger, Nnamdi Kanu and his kindred spirits in the northern Arewa youth group.

    Perhaps not. But when Osinbajo declared that those found to be promoting hate speech would be treated as terrorists, discerning folk at home and abroad, rejoiced that it was only a matter of time before Nigeria’s merchants of odium and grief, scalded in then Acting President, Osinbajo’s anti-hate speech inferno.

    But for all his bluster, his fire is tame; like  the random politician’s, it will scald no one, burn no one, except human integers beneath the nation’s sociopolitical hierarchies.

    “The Federal Government has today drawn the line on hate speech. Hate speech is a species of terrorism. Terrorism as it is defined popularly is the unlawful use of violence or intimidation against individuals or groups especially for political ends,” ýsaid Osinbajo, at a National Economic Council (NEC) retreat on national security at the Banquet Hall of the Presidential Villa.

    To an assemblage of state governors, ministers and other stakeholders, said: “As I have said, we’ve drawn a line against hate speech, it will not be tolerated, it will be taken as an act of terrorism and all of the consequences will follow it.”

    Sadly, Osinbajo’s pronouncement, like Buhari’s anti-corruption crusade, reverberates like a rat’s sigh under the claws of a wild cat. The anti-terrorism law, like the All Progressives Congress’s ‘Change’ mantra, resonates as the triumph of noise over bite; the elevation of will from juvenile fantasy to eternal hysterics. It’s the paroxysm of mind over matter, often likable to the wishful thoughts of a cripple at the sight of a newly broken stallion.

    Osinbajo said that the intimidation of a population by words is an act of terrorism, that the APC administration intends to curtail. He noted that the Terrorism (Prevention) Act 2011 (as amended), defined terrorism as an act which is deliberately done with malice which may seriously harm or damage a country or seriously intimidate a population.

    Such pronouncement could be considered noble and perhaps valiant, in saner clime and under more promising considerations. But this is Nigeria, a nation where politicians pay lip service to ‘change.’

    Like his principal, Osinbajo lives oblivious to the miseries and deaths of Nigeria’s hopeless, impoverished, vulnerable divide. Indigent husbands and wives, the young and elderly, toddlers and newborns, die excruciatingly by affliction of hate governance and abhorrent leadership epitomised by the incumbent ruling class.

    Many more are falling off or getting bumped off the All Progressives Congress (APC)’s wagon of ‘Change’ via deathly roads, unemployment, terrorism and poverty. Sadly, Osinbajo, Buhari and their feeble opposition in the PDP,  live oblivious to these tragic realities.

    Both men, despite their overhyped “body language” which allegedly abhors corruption, have developed a knack for platitudinous chant and sound bites; Buhari vowed to wipe out corruption and Osinbajo vowed as Acting President, to treat hate speech as terrorism.

    Yet they conveniently ignore the inconvenient truths and symbolism that insinuates duplicity in their will. Both men are unable to weed out corrupt elements in their cabinet. Their administration lacks ingenuity, ethical and intellectual capacity to resolve the country’s electricity, security, unemployment and energy conundrum.

    Even if they reclaim power in 2019, Osinbajo, his boss, Buhari and cabinet, won’t resolve the nation’s electricity, security and unemployment woes.

    This is attributable to lack of will, inventiveness, moral certitude and proficiency of their administration. Thus the rot persists on their watch: Nigeria’s road transport network is in the worst state ever and there are no concrete plans to establish a functional and dependable rail system, road, air and sea transportation among others.

    It remains extremely impossible for children of ‘political nobodies’ and commoners to access quality education, loans and self-empowerment provisions touted by Osinbajo and his boss, as part of their grand plot to combat unemployment.

    Persistent ritual killings, by Badoo gang and company, still persists across the country and Nigeria pulses dangerously with hospital corridors of death. General hospitals and other primary care health centres (PHCs) are poorly staffed and underfunded. Little wonder Buhari had to embark on medical tourism abroad, in flagrant contradiction of the APC’s mantra of ‘change.’

    The APC leadership is unable to prosecute public officers perceived to be corrupt and answerable to scandalous charges, according to the EFCC.

    While Osinbajo mustered his anti-hate speech philosophy, was he unaware of hateful governance perpetrated by the APC and People’s Democratic Party (PDP) leadership across the country?

    Ogun State still looms like a gothic platitude of pain and death from its transit townships but the “Gateway State” remains Governor Ibikunle Amosun’s bower of bliss. There, in his stately Eden, he lives immune and insensate to the ravages of ill-will and pent-up fury tearing the natives apart from inside out.

    Amosun has a blast inside the Government House at Oke Mosan everyday simply because he does not have to stir and retire to bed wondering if he would die along the deadly stretch of Lagos-Abeokuta highway, particularly at the spots where innocent children, mothers, fathers – dependants and breadwinners – die like stray fowls, accidentally or by installments, in his severely cratered, administrative landmine.

    It’s the same rot across 36 States  of the federation. And this writer’s summation is amply substantiated by prominent chieftain of Osinbajo’s APC, Senator Dino Melaye, whose controversial recall was ‘unsurprisingly’ stalled in more controversial circumstances.

    “Unfortunately, we the leaders, myself inclusive, have failed this nation and have failed the younger generation, myself inclusive.

    “The reason why we are where we are today is because there is a disconnect between leadership and followership. Once there is no trust between the followership and the leadership, it will definitely have a negative concomitant effect on the economy, and every other facet of our national life.

    ‘’What we should fix is democracy; Democracy is government of the people, by the people and for the people.

    “What we have is greediocracy; government of the greedy by the greedy, for the greedy. ‘We the leaders want to win elections at all cost, so we spend money to win elections.

    “The followership also is greedy, they accept money to vote. So, head or tail, there is a need for attitudinal change and this is affecting everything,” admitted Melaye.

    It would be lovely and humane of Nigeria’s Vice President, Osinbajo, and his boss, President Buhari, to also treat hate governance as an act of terrorism, making sure that “all of the consequences will follow it.”