Tag: TETFUND

  • ‘TETFUND law is discriminatory’

    ‘TETFUND law is discriminatory’

    Prof David Olufemi Bamgbose is the National Chairman of the 50-member Association of Proprietors of Private Colleges of Education in Nigeria. In this interview with SEYI ODEWALE, Bamgbose criticises the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND) for excluding private colleges of education from benefiting from its funds, other issues.

    Private colleges of education are excluded from benefiting from the TETFund fund. What is your take on this?

    At the twilight of the last administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan, about 48 bills were passed by the then Senate in one day for presidential assent. One of such was the TETFUND bill.

    TETFUND originally was Education Tax Fund (ETF), whereby companies and organisations contribute about two per cent of their profit into the fund for the purposes of strategic interventions in our institutions. The idea was to give a more microscopic view or attention to tertiary institutions. It was later changed to TETFUND (Tertiary Education Trust Fund). But to our utmost dismay, private tertiary institutions were excluded as beneficiaries.

    Did you find out why?

    What we discovered, according to them, was that private tertiary’s inclusion would encourage proliferation of such institutions.

    In the first instance, government gives approval to such institutions? How then can you say it will encourage the proliferation of such institutions? There should be needs assessment, which should be carried out to know the number of institutions that you want in a particular environment and at a particular time.

    So, I think it is a lot of disservice to many public spirited individuals, who have invested their resources, time and money in supplementing government’s efforts in establishing private tertiary institutions in Nigeria.

    Proprietors of private universities are also excluded but they don’t seem to be reacting this way

    Private universities are reacting, but I want you to know that there are peculiarities in tertiary institutions. Talking specifically about private colleges whose association I chair, we are very peculiar. One of the challenges that we have is low enrolment because of the perception of teachers in the society.

    How are teachers perceived?

    If you walk into secondary schools now and ask to know how many of the pupils will want to be teachers in future, you will hardly get up to 1 per cent positive response from them. The blame for the rot in basic education has been heaped on the colleges of education because we produce teachers at that level. So, stakeholders in education have now said if we are having problem at that level, look at colleges of education.

    I think there was a policy that graduates of colleges of education are not to teach in secondary schools?

    By law, they teach in primary and junior secondary schools. Of course, specialised teachers’ institutions are better than those produced from conventional institutions. Teachers’ education is peculiar. You need to have certain disposition. You don’t just educate teachers, you train them. It involves sound moral education, codes and knowledge, which specialised institutions have.

    Unfortunately teachers in public schools are blaming the rot in schools on teachers of private school, but my argument is this: if you look at the graduate output from private colleges of education in Nigeria you will see that our contribution is not up to five per cent which to me,  is the best in the sector. The reason is this: we have the best students to teacher ratio because of low enrolment, we don’t just teach our students, we train them. We don’t have the challenge of large enrolment such as unwieldy hall. We have teachers who are more than adequate enough to take care of those we have enrolled.

    If government is saying it does not want to support infrastructural projects embarked upon by private institutions, what about staff and students of such institutions? Are they all not citizens of this country?

    Is it only through Federal Government that the fund can be accessed? Can’t state governments  assist private colleges.

    State governments have their cups full already. We are not even talking about budgetary allocations, but the money that was contributed by private companies and organisations. TETFUND is from private sources, so why are they saying private institutions are not entitled to benefit? Our argument is not that we should be included in the budget. Our position is that we should not be left out of the fund which come from private organisations and companies.

  • Private Universities and TETFUND

    SIR: Running a university, be it public or privately-owned is not a tea party. It demands a brilliant vision; to institute and execute the right processes and procedures and getting them right, even from the beginning as Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the co-founders of Google admonished. Correct projections must be made and pro-active measures and mechanisms put in place to oil the machines of the day-to-day administration.

    Similarly, solid and stable infrastructure, high quality manpower, state- of- the- art libraries and laboratories are equally needed, all with the aim of producing top-range manpower as the engine to drive the nation’s economic growth. Obviously therefore, much money is required to achieve the lofty aims of the proprietors and chief promoters of such universities. It should be noted, that establishing private universities is not for profit but to place Nigeria in the comity of nations, when it comes to meeting international standards on education delivery and economic prosperity.

    In the light of this, it is curious, if not unjust that private universities in Nigeria are being denied access to the much-needed Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND). Incidentally, part of the fund comes from the private sector, even as research findings from such citadels of learning are meant to benefit the entire nation. It is glaring fact that graduates produced from both the public and private universities enter the same perilous labour market.

    As rightly noted by much-respected Prof. Isaac Adeyemi, the Vice Chancellor of Bells University of Technology, Ota, Ogun State who doubles as the Chairman of the Committee of Vice Chancellors and Registrar of Private Universities (CVCRPU) the repositioning of privately-owned universities for improved performance and service delivery would remain a mirage without adequate funding.

    Incidentally, that formed the theme of the 2015 Annual General Meeting of the body at the main auditorium of the prestigious Chief Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library(OOPL) recently.

    Said he: “For private universities to be repositioned, resource verification for new programmes must be enforced and accreditation requirements (for existing programmes) must be met. Doing this will relieve private universities of the burden of dual resource verification and accreditation, with the attendant pressures.”

    This clarion call could not have come at a more auspicious time because, Nigeria has witnessed massive capital flight running into billions of naira not only to Europe, North America and South Africa, but also to neighbouring countries along the West African Coast. Unfortunately, some of these universities are either not approved by their host countries or are substandard by Nigerian standards. In addition, the fees charged by these universities are higher than what their Nigerian counterparts are currently charging! The import of this ugly development is that many parents in Nigeria lack confidence in our education system. TETFUND should therefore come to the rescue.

    Nigerians should be worried that back in the early seventies four of our universities ranked amongst the best ten on the African continent but the reverse is the situation today. This is another food-for-thought for our policy makers and those who implement them.

    • Ayo Oyoze Baje,

    Lagos

     

  • Buhari urged to withhold assent to TETFund Amendment Bill

    Buhari urged to withhold assent to TETFund Amendment Bill

    The Independent Service Delivery Monitoring Group (ISDMG) has urged President Muhammadu Buhari to withhold assent to the amendment of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund Act passed by the Seventh National Assembly.

    The group argued that Buhari’s assent amendment of the act was counter-productive and would drag the government into an unwanted industrial crisis.

    “We appeal to President Muhammadu Buhari not to assent to this bill for the simple reason that it is not only counter-productive but will drag this government into unwanted industrial crises.”

    Speaking at a news briefing in Abuja, ISDMG Executive Director, Dr. Chima Amadi, claimed that the group’s position was in view of fact that the bill will be a set back for higher education development in Nigeria.

    Amadi noted that assenting to the bill might impose a greater financial burden and exposure to the TETFund much worse than the ETF regime.

    He said: “The most bewildering aspect of the amendment is the explanatory memorandum. Once allowed to stand, it will take us back to the old Education Trust Fund (ETF) era which was restructured owing to the limitation brought on her activities as a result of interventions in too many institutions. This law will bring about the proliferation of institution, which will negate the change from ETF to TETFund.”

    He said that the fact that the bill was rejected in 2012 by stakeholders and unions was a pointer to its unacceptability by the unions and civil society organisations.

    Amadi said “The big question is, how come an amendment that was rejected and thrown out find its way into the National Assembly for it to even be passed? Does it mean that the aspiration of Nigerians as reflected in the public hearing does not matter? If it does matter, why waste taxpayer’s money in organizing a public hearing only to do what you thought was right?”

    The group also faulted the amendment of the bill to redefine tertiary education to include universities, polytechnics, collages of education and the Nigeria Law School.

    He went further: “Have we paused to reflect on the wider implication of allowing this amendment to stand especially in the face of several other institutes that regulate the license of professional? This may just be the opening of the floodgate since they are established by law.”

    His word: “the right of the National Assembly to make laws for the nation is not under contention here; it is their responsibility enshrined in our laws to make laws for the country, we are only looking at the implications of some of this laws and the processes we went through in the passage of the law before we got to where we are.”

    A member of the group, Mr. Olajuwon Babatunde, also urged the president to shun the bill. Babatunde said the amendment was aimed at weakening TETFund, which had revamped the tertiary institutions in the country.

    “I appeal to the president to shun the amendment of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund Act which was passed by the 7th Assembly. TETFund is one of the most effective institutions we have in this country which has totally transformed tertiary education and taken it to another level. This bill is bent on reducing the impact that it has. We will no longer feel the benefits of this institution. We should focus on critical issues that will boost our educational system in Nigeria and not seek to weaken TETFund,’’ Babatunde said.

    The Tertiary Education Trust Fund Bill was among the 46 bills passed by the 7th Senate in a last minute flurry of activities recently.

    The bill sought to change the board’s structure to include a representative of the Nigerian Law School; Redefine tertiary education to include the Nigerian Law School; and define university to include the Nigerian Law School and any institution established by law which runs full time programme which leads to formal qualification prescribed by law.

  • TETFund exclusion: We feel cheated, says Adeleke varsity VC

    TETFund exclusion: We feel cheated, says Adeleke varsity VC

    When the chief executives of private universities meet in Abeokuta in five days, the issue of non-access to the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) will once again be on the agenda, says Prof Oluwole Amusan, Vice Chancellor of Adeleke University, Ede in Osun State.

    Amusan said private universities would not tire of pestering the government to change the unfair regulations that deny the institutions of grants they should rightly access, especially considering that the fund is contributed by the private sector.

    In an interview with journalists at the university, Amusan said: “This has been a debate for quite some time now.  As the Vice Chancellor of Adeleke University and as an institution, we feel cheated.  We believe private universities should have access to TETFund, just like public ones.  And one of the reasons why we say this is because private universities are assisting government in providing education to the populace. And if we are doing this, why should we be denied access to the fund that assists institutions in carrying out a responsibility that government is really supposed to address?

    “Secondly, you will discover that the source of TETFund, private organizations contribute to it.  If the source is from private organizations, then it is morally wrong to deprive private universities from accessing that fund.  That is our stand.  And I can speak for private universities in the country.”

    Other members of the top management of the university joined Amusan in condemning government’s stance on TETFund.

    Dean, Faculty of Arts, Prof Oguntoyinbo Atere, faulted the Federal Government for charging high taxes yet not giving private universities anything in return.

    “We are being highly taxed.  They take our taxes.  This is a private university; but we are paying so much taxes that go to the coffers of the government.  And yet, nothing comes back to us because it is private.  This is a clear case of cheating and we are very angry,” she said.

    On his part, the Dean, Faculty of Law, Prof Johnson Anifalade, described it as an illegality.

    Contrary to belief that private universities exist to make profit, the reason many argue that they should not benefit from TETFUND, the Vice Chancellor said Adeleke University proprietor, Dr Adedeji Adeleke, not only subsidises fees to students but also allows them to pay in instalments.

    He said: “The fees charged are between N500,000 and N800,000.  But mind you, this fee includes feeding and accommodation.  The N580,000 being charged includes tuition, feeding, and accommodation.  It is a composite fee that is being charged.

    “For programmes like engineering, N741,000 is what is being charged.  For Law, the total fee is N830,000.  And I want to say that it even includes fees charged for the partnership we have with New Horizons that is preparing students for different certifications we have in IT.  So that is the range of fees being charged in Adeleke University.

    “The Pro-Chancellor has given students the latitude to pay in four instalments.  When they come in, they pay the first quarter.  They stay for some time, and towards the end of the first semester, they pay the second instalment.  When they begin the second semester they have the latitude to pay the third instalment and before they do their final exams, they pay the fourth instalment.  And it makes it in a way that is somehow comfortable and easy for people to access education here at Adeleke University.”

    Regarding accreditation, the Vice Chancellor said that of the 13 programmes run by the university, eight are fully accredited, while five have partial accreditation.

    He refuted the notion that universities do window dressing for accreditation, adding that Adeleke University, by virtue of its Christian inclination, does not cut corners.

    “I will say that members of accreditation teams have a way by which they know whether or not people are window dressing.  We try as much as possible as a faith based institution to be open and to show who we are within the regulations of the National Universities Commission (NUC),” he said.

    Lending credence to the Vice Chancellor’s claims, the Deputy Vice Chancellor, Prof Ibikunle Tijani, noted that NUC sends a second set of assessors secretly to verify what the first accreditation team did.

    “There is what we call a post-monitoring quality assurance in NUC.  It is not that you get results.  NUC would send people as mystery shoppers to see whether or not what you presented was just a façade or not. I can tell you that a few of us at Adeleke University also serve in this national endeavour  to ensure quality education,” he said.

  • TETfund urges Buhari  not to sign its bill

    TETfund urges Buhari not to sign its bill

    The Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) is urging President Muhammadu Buhari not to sign the bill on the organisation as it is fraught with many flaws.

    The bill titled “Tertiary Education Trust Fund (Establishment etc) Act (Amendment) 2015” was among the 46 bills passed by the 7th National Assembly in 10 minutes before it wound down on June 3, 2015.

    Championing the cause to stop Buhari from signing the bill into law is the Executive Secretary of TETfund, Prof Suleiman Bogoro.

    Bogoro who spoke in Port Harcourt during the opening ceremony of the 30th Conference of Association of Vice Chancellors of Nigerian Universities (AVCNU) said that if signed into law, the bill would kill the agency and Nigerian universities.

    Bogoro said that he heard of the passage of the bill in the news like every other person and he was surprised because the lawmakers who passed the bill claimed that about three years ago they had invited TETFund, the unions and other stakeholders to a public hearing after a second reading of the bill. He said that the lawmakers also claimed that it was stakeholders who suggested that the Nigerian law school be included as beneficiaries to the TETFund.

    The Executive Secretary said that when he heard that, he asked: “why Nigerian Law School alone, we have other professional institutions and regulatory agencies, why Nigerian law school alone?”

    While pointing out that his position is without bias, Bogoro stated that “the last paragraph of the Act was unbelievable – though he did not state what it said.

    “The Act sought to redefine what the university ought to be and the final part of that definition is what you cannot believe.”

    For this reason, Bogoro called on the vice chancellors of Nigerian universities to join him in advocating “that Mr President should not sign that bill because it will kill TETFund and the university.”

    Declaring the conference open, the Rivers State Governor, Chief Nyesom Wike announced plans by his administration to overhaul the education system in the state through effective Information and Communication Technology (ICT) development.

    Wike who described the theme of the conference which is: “The Role of ICT in University Administration and Curriculum Delivery” as apt and timely also acknowledged that ICT is one way to guarantee efficiency and transparency in the nation’s educational system.

    He challenged universities to exploit the potentials of the “info tech” to enable them check administrative hitches, stressing that ICT remains germane if most of the universities are going to survive in the present world.

    In his opening remarks, the Chairman of AVCNU and Vice Chancellor of the University of Port Harcourt, Prof. Joseph Ajienka, thanked the governor for attending the conference and urged him to support the body to achieve its set objective.

    Ajienka also lamented the numerous challenges vice-chancellors are faced with ranging from funding to poor conditions of service, but expressed hope that the governor would use his experience as former Minister of Education to address the problems of the nation’s universities.

    In his welcome address, the Vice Chancellor of the Rivers State University of Science and Technology, Port Harcourt, Prof Barineme Fakae while thanking the governor for gracing the occasion, said the university’s transformation was achieved through a robust ICT programme.

  • ‘Why TETFund created zonal offices’

    Team visits Osun varsity 

    Southwest Co-ordinator of Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund) Mr Olusegun Jebooda has visited Osun State University.

    His team was received by the Acting Vice-Chancellor (VC), Prof Jelil Oguntola, and top members of the management team, including Acting Registrar, Mr G.A. Shittu, Acting Bursar, Mr S.A. Adegbite and Acting Director of Academic Planning, Dr M.O. Adeleke.

    The team said its visit was in continuation of its tour of institutions in the Southwest to relate with them on their challenges.

    Jebooda said TETFund created  zonal offices, following complaints by some institutions so as to be closer to them.

    Management praised the team for the visit, saying the school would remain grateful to the agency for its support on training of teaching and non-teaching staff and research grants.

    Oguntola said the support the institution has received from TETFund could not be quantified.

  • French Village needs TETfund grants, monarch appeals

    French Village needs TETfund grants, monarch appeals

    THE Akran of Badagry Kingdom, De Wheno menu-Toyi 1, has appealed to the Federal Government to make the Nigeria-French Language Village (NFLV) a beneficiary of the Tertiary Education Trust fund (TETfund) grants.

    The monarch warned that its non inclusion may pose a threat to its survival and other inter-university centres.

    NFLV caters for the Language immersion programme for students of French Language in universities and colleges of education.

    The TETfund is a Federal Government agency set up to disburse the two per cent tax of accessible funds of private companies to tertiary institutions in Nigeria.

    A statement by the Public Relations Officers (PRO) of the NFLV, Mr Festus Okundia, revealed that the monarch made the plea while welcoming the new Director of the inter-university institution, Prof Raufu Adebisi, to his palace.

    The traditional ruler while appealing said the institution could only survive if it is adequately funded.

    “No educational institution can survive in the face of paucity of funds,” he said.

    The monarch lauded the achievements of the institution and urged its new management to build on the village’s rapid development and rebranding for greater accomplishment.

    On his part, Prof Adebisi thanked the monarch for the warm reception and promised to continue to promote the relationship.

  • Sokoto varsity gets N2.09b from TETFUND in seven months, says VC

    The Vice Chancellor of  Sokoto State University, Prof. Nuhu Yaqub, said yesterday that the institution received over N2.09 billion from the Tertiary Education Trust Fund  (TETFUND) in the last seven months.

    He spoke in Sokoto at the matriculation of 1,002 students admitted for the 2014/2015 academic session.

    Prof. Yaqub said the fund would be used to provide two  lecture theatres, begin the building of the Faculty of Science and provide Internet facilities, among others.

    He added:  ‘’The provision of the Internet connections will make the campus ICT-compliant.”

    The don said the government had extended its SURE-P resources to the campus.

    He noted that a computer-based examination centre would be set up in the university.

    Yaqub acknowledged the  priority given the institution by the government.

    He hailed Governor Aliyu Wamakko for supporting the institution.

    The vice chancellor warned the students against flouting  rules and regulations.

    He added: ‘’We will never compromise our standard of discipline and academic excellence. Any contravention by  the workers  and students  will be sanctioned.’’

    Represented by the Special Adviser on Higher Education, Prof. Gajam Bon Ardo, Governor Wamakko promised to continue to fund the institution.

    He said: ‘’I  urge you to reciprocate the huge expenditure of the government and your parents by being dedicated to your studies and shunning vices.’’

  • Union gives one week ultimatum over TETFund, salary deductions

    Union gives one week ultimatum over TETFund, salary deductions

    The crisis between the management of the College of Education, Ekiadolor in Edo State and the Coalition of Union,  deepened at the weekend, following the alleged inability of the school management to remit to the union’s TETFund deductions and the non-payment of last December and this year’s January salaries.

    The union, at a meeting in Benin, the state capital, gave a seven-day ultimatum to the management to pay the unions or face another strike.

    The union’s chairman, Comrade Fred Omonuwa, who addressed reporters in Benin, described the development as a “grand theft and deceit” allegedly perpetrated by the management.

    Buttressing his claim over the alleged diversion and mismanagement of TETFnd, Omonuwa displayed copy of a letter, dated June 6, 2014, in which  TETFund’s Executive Secretary B. M. Umoh, queried the bursar, Esekhile Ehiremem, whose name was allegedly smuggled in as a beneficiary of TETFund’s conference.

    It was learnt that the arrangement was against the policy of the fund.

    The letter, addressed to the Provost, Prof Amen Uhunmwangho, reads: “You are kindly requested to recover  N1,500,005 from Mr Esekhile Emmanuel Ehiremem, lodged same in your TETFund dedicated account and forward evidence of such to the fund. The amount so recovered should be used to pay the underlisted workers, who were omitted and short paid in our earlier release. Edokpa W. Imonikhe, (N793,960) and Mrs Noruwa Doris Ohenhen, (N560,000) short paid.

    Omonuwa said: “The unions observed with great disappointment the delay on the part of College management to remit the union’s trust fund deductions of COEASU and NASU for last October and November to the trust fund executives…”

  • Calling on Tetfund

    SIR: One of the success stories of this current government is the introduction of the Tertiary Intervention Fund. Not too long ago, the presidency told the nation that many universities were not accessing the large pool of fund set aside for training and  infrastructural development of tertiary institutions.

    But as I write this letter, I am aware that very many academic staff on training may lose their studentship, while those who just secured admission may not be able to meet registration deadlines if funds are not released urgently by Tetfund, Abuja.

    I therefore use this medium to appeal to whom it may concern in Tetfund Abuja to please urgently release the approved funds to universities that have done the needful. I personally do not want to believe the rumour that the delay in release may have been as a result of diversion of the fund for political campaigns.

    I beg those in charge to please help save our studies and career. May God bless you as you do this.

     

    • Lanre Akinola

    North West university

    Mafikeng, South Africa.