Tag: The Nation newspaper

  • Adeboye loses private secretary, Olorunnimbe

    Pastor Adetokunbo Abayomi Olorunnimbe, the Chief-of-Staff and Chief Private Secretary to the General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God(RCCG), Pastor Enoch Adeboye is dead.

    He died on Saturday March 30 at 60 years.

    Son of the deceased Olaolu Olorunnimbe, confirmed the death, stating that burial arrangements will be announced soon.

    Olorunnimbe was born on May 26th, 1958 in the United Kingdom to Ishola Adekunle Olorunnimbe and late Simisola Adetoun Olorunnimbe.

    He got married to Modupe Olorunnimbe nee Botu in April 1987 with whom he wove his life around their family, the church, and community.

    Theirs was a life and home filled with love, laughter, music, friendship and faith.

    Olorunnimbe was a man who daily practiced gracious hospitality.

    The eldest son of Hon. Justice I. A. Olorunnimbe, he was known affectionately by his siblings as “Broda Adey.”

    As a man of faith, Tokunbo was deeply devoted to the life of the church.

    He served in many capacities at the RCCG. He was pastor of several parishes and RCCG City of Palms.

    As Private Secretary to the General Overseer, he was a highly trusted and respected member of the church.

    He never wanted praise for any of his labour of love but always saw his service to the church, to the community, and to his family as a way of sharing his love for God.

    A fierce intellectual, Tokunbo was trained as a lawyer in the University of Lagos and Cambridge University.

    He was stimulated by cerebral debates and was a man who was always up for the adventure of life.

    But no matter what he was doing, he enjoyed his time with his family – including his church family – more than anything.

    Olorunnimbe is survived by his wife Dr. Modupe Olorunnimbe, their children: Folasayo Williams, Laolu Olorunnimbe and son- in- law Bode Williams as well as grandchildren.

    He is also survived by his father, Hon. Justice I. A. Olorunnimbe, OON brothers, sisters, aunties, uncles, cousins, nieces and nephews.

     

  • Fire razes building in Kano

    The Kano State Fire Service yesterday said fire had razed the last floor of a three-storey building at Sabon Gari in Fagge Local Government Area of Kano.

    Spokesman of the service, Alhaji Saidu Mohammed, who confirmed the incident to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), said the fire started at about 02:11 p.m. at No 83 Sarkin Yaki, Sabon Gari, Kano.

    “We received a distress call from Sabon Gari Market Division this afternoon (Saturday) from one Mr. Emeka at about 02:11 p.m. that there was a fire outbreak at a dwelling house.

    “Upon receiving the information, we quickly sent a fire vehicle to the scene at about 02:18 p.m., to bring the situation under control,’’ he said.

    He said the inferno affected three bedrooms and two kitchens in the residential building.

    In another development, the fire service spokesman said that another fire occurred around 12:52 p.m. at Rimin Kebe Gadar Katako in Nasarawa Local Government Area.

    “Out of the four rooms, only one room was slightly burnt with the quick intervention of the firemen,” Mohammed said.

    He added that the cause of the fire was still being investigated.

  • Adamawa APC endorses Lawan, Gbajabiamila for NASS leadership

    The Adamawa State Chapter of the All Progressives Congress (APC) has taken its stand over which candidates to support to man leadership positions in the incoming ninth National Assembly.

    While revealing its position, the party said it has thrown its weight behind the candidatures of Sen. Ahmed Lawan and Femi Gbajabiamila for the leadership of the national assembly.

    The Organising Secretary of the party, Alhaji Ahmed Lawal, said in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Yola, that the decision of the party leadership at the national level to endorse the pair was logical.

    According to him, Lawan is already the Senate Majority Leader while Gbajabiamila is the House Leader.

    “As far as Adamawa APC is concern, the decision of the national leadership of the party is final, hence party supremacy.

    “The endorsement of Ahmed Lawal and Femi Gbajabiamila for national leadership is logical since they are leaders of the APC caucus in the national assembly.

    “All members of the APC irrespective of their status should abide by the decision of our party leadership.

    “Any decision taken by Adams Oshiomhole, and Ahmed Tinubu, who is the national leader of our dear party is in the best interest of the APC in particular and the nation in general.”

  • The supremacy of faith!

    Welcome to another impactful week! I hope you were blessed by last week teaching. This week, we shall focus on: The Supremacy of Faith!

    From scriptures, we discover that we engage in faith to tap into divine virtues, which in turn enhance our value. The Bible says: Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. For by it the elders obtained a good report (Hebrews 11:1-2). Also, our vision can never deliver beyond the level of faith we are operating in. Hence, the beauty and colour of every vision is a function of the quality of faith that is employed. Therefore, without faith, our vision has no substance because it is faith that defines the substance of our vision. Every act of God in our lives is only realisable via faith and as long as our faith is on fire, we remain on flight and also in command of things happening around us. Thus, it is to us according to our faith, not according to our vision (Matthew 9:29). So, if our faith is down, our life and destiny will be down.

    What, Then, is the Supremacy of Faith?

    • Faith Engages the Word for Performance: It engages the Word of God in order to enforce the delivery of our destiny and desires. The Bible records about Mary: …Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word. And the angel departed from her (Luke 1:38).Sometimes, it may not be convenient for us but if it is commanded, we must engage in it because that’s the only way to where we are going and it is what determines the happenings in our lives. That is what makes faith a vital force that gets the job done. As long as our faith is in place, we remain in command over the issues of life.

    Faith is A Spiritual Force: Faith is neither a psychological nor philosophical force; it is a spiritual force. It is not an intellectual issue either; it is a spiritual virtue that operates within the spirit of man not in his head. As it is written: For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation (Romans 10:10). Thus, whatever is working contrary to our inheritance in Christ, faith can stop it instantly. For instance, the woman with the issue of blood had her faith intact and her health was restored immediately (Mark 5:25-34).

    Faith is a Spiritual Chemistry: It is the spiritual chemistry with which we quench the oppositions, clear obstacles and access our possessions. The Bible says: For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith (Mark 11:23). Every time faith is at work, a spiritual connection is established and that connection provokes the flow of virtue from God. That virtue flows to enhance our value.

    Faith is A Living Force: It is a living force, drawn from the living Word to produce living proofs. That woman drew from Jesus, the Living Word, and a living proof was produced. Faith is not just believing that God can do something; it is being moved to do something to prove that we believe. When we are moved to act on what God commands, He is committed to perform. So, faith is an act. For it is written: But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him (Hebrews 11:6). Therefore, faith is the only way to move God in our direction and the only way to stop the devil from molesting us (Ephesians 6:16).

    Faith is Hard Work: Faith is no cheap talk; faith is hard work. It is written: For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his. Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief (Hebrews 4:10-11). It requires a form of labour. We don’t wish for faith but work at faith. Faith does not answer to wishes; it answers to workings, that is, working with the Word of God. Whether it is conventional faith or supernatural faith, all forms of faith draw from our Word bank or reservoir. The things on our inside are what faith draws from; it has to be there before faith can draw. The Bible says: So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God (Romans 10:17; see also 2 Peter 1:5).

    Faith is a Great Profession: Faith is no mere confession; it is a great profession. As it is written: Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; for he is faithful that promised (Hebrews 10:23). Profession here connotes definite skills. Thus, it requires skills to maximise its benefits (Hebrews 5:12-14).

    In summary, faith is an asset of inestimable value, an unstoppable force which taps into the omnipotence of God, quenches all the fiery darts of the devil, addresses all satanic assaults and commits the integrity of divinity.  However, you cannot experience the supremacy of faith unless you are born again. Are you born again? If you are not, this is an opportunity to do so. Simply say the following prayer: Lord Jesus, I come to You today. I am a sinner. Forgive me my sins. Cleanse me with Your precious Blood. Today, I accept You as my Lord and personal Saviour. Thank You Jesus for saving me! Now, I know I am born again! For further reading, please get my books: Unlimited Power of Faith, Understanding the Power of Faith, Exploits of Faith and Born to Win! I invite you to fellowship with us at the Faith Tabernacle, Canaanland, Ota, the covenant home of Winners. We have four services on Sundays, holding at 6:00 a.m., 7:50 a.m., 9:40 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. respectively. I know this teaching has blessed you. Write and share your testimony with me through: Faith Tabernacle, Canaanland, Ota, P.M.B. 21688, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria; or call 01-4548070, 01-4548280; or E-mail: feedback@lfcww.org; Facebook: www.facebook.com/davidoyedepoministries/; Twitter: @DavidOyedepoMin.

  • The good, the bad and the ugly: post-elections lessons from America

    [Yes, I had the 1966 iconic film of director, Sergio Leone, in mind in choosing the title for this week’s column. But since the very catchy title has been adopted for many uses, I am only following a long line of appropriations of the famous movie and its title. Thus, in what follows, in using the film and its moral fables as an inspiration, I give my sense of developments in US politics, government and public affairs after the midterm elections of 2018. I do this in the belief that we in Nigeria and other parts of the world will find much to learn from the exercise. Dear reader, as you read the following notes on the good, the bad and the ugly in America at the present time, please remember that many aspects of our own politics, governmental structure and even constitutional arrangements in Nigeria were copied wholesale from the United States, with very little or no revisions to suit our own historical, cultural and economic conditions.]

    The Good

    The United States is a diverse, pluralistic and multicultural nation, like Nigeria. Indeed, like many of the nations of the planet, since monolingual, monoethnic and monocultural nations like South Korea and Lesotho are in the minority of the states of the world. Trump and his white-nationalist, neofascist base came to power on the basis of stoking the fires of division and separation between the communities of the country, using hatred, bigotry and violence as their tools. At the height of the “success” of Trump and his movement, it seemed as if their energies, their mojo came from elemental forces, from nature itself. For this reason, only the comprehensive mobilization of all progressive, unified and also elemental forces could defeat Trump and his movement. And that is what happened in the midterm elections of 2018.

    In about the last a century and half, America had not seen the kind of coalition of forces and combination of energies across generations that won the landslide victory against Trump in last year’s midterm elections. Black, brown and white, old and young (especially the young), men and women (especially women), and citizens going back many generations together with recent immigrants to the country, all came together. It seemed like rousing all the binding, centripetal forces of nature – and it has been so celebrated. Fortunately, the victorious forces have not been carried away by euphoria; they know all too well that their victory was partial, that Trump and his allies still control the presidency and one of the two houses of Congress. But even so, look at what the branch of Congress controlled by the victorious forces of a united, progressive and multicultural America has begun to do. It has begun to exercise regulatory checkmates on Trump’s abuse and misuse of the presidency. It has begun to map out agendas and policies more beneficial to the working and non-working poor, to the protection and enhancement of the environment for living generations and the posterity of generations that will come after us.

    Worthy of special notice is the fact that the new alignment of forces after the midterm elections of last year has shifted considerably in the direction of taking head on the blatant and corrosive misogyny and sexism of Trump and his base. The number of women that campaigned and won in the elections was unprecedented. But beyond number – although that is very important – there is the quality and the diversity of backgrounds represented by the new female congressional members. For beyond taking up the militant sexism of Trump and his allies, the new radical female members of the legislature have also taken up the establishment of the Democratic Party itself. Katie Porter, Ilha Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and others have given every indication that they will raise and promote issues that both ruling class parties, the Republicans as well as the Democrats, have for long been too timid or too obtuse to raise in a vigorous and spirited manner. One of these is the issue of socialized medicine that would, for the first time in history, make medical care free and available to all citizens regardless of class, status or lack of the means to pay for it. Here is another issue that they are taking up: complete equality of women and men in the workplace and in guarantees for state support of the work of raising children and members of the next generation.

    In all these developments, it may seem both that good and evil are fighting it out in Trump’s America and good is increasingly more empowered than evil, but everyone knows that   the struggles are not being waged by angels and demons but flesh-and-blood human beings. This is important because among all the economically and scientifically advanced nations of the world, America stands almost alone in still being considerably driven by Christianity of a medieval, fundamentalist and superstitious kind – like Nigeria, like many countries of the developing world. Thus, the moral fable of the good, the bad and the ugly will take us only as far as our rationality and our humanness will take us. This leads us to the rubric, the tale of the bad.

    The Bad: the unfolding saga of Barr on Mueller

    Only in America, you’d have to say. Robert Mueller submits his long-awaited Report and Trump’s Attorney General, William Barr, gives a four-page report on the Report. Nearly three weeks after the release of the Report and two weeks after the release of his own “report” on the Report, Barr still refuses to let America and the world get the chance to read Mueller’s findings for and by themselves. Meanwhile, Barr’s “report” has completely overshadowed Mueller’s Report – at least for now and for the foreseeable future of the next few weeks or even months. To say that this is bad for Trump, bad for Barr and also bad for America is to make an understatement.

    In many countries of the world, when the findings of a report are so bad, so damaging to a ruler and his administration, the report simply is suppressed and it never sees the light of day. America being one of the hallowed leaders of the “free world”, to completely suppress the Mueller Report is obviously out of the question. But what is the effect of delaying and prolonging the release of the Report? Here is one development: a firestorm has erupted about what Mueller’s Report actually contains, based on what Barr has “reported”. This is partly because some members of Mueller’s team have told some newspapers that Barr’s “report” severely misrepresents Mueller’s findings. But these disgruntled members of Mueller’s team have done this in secret, not boldly, not openly. Meanwhile, note that Mueller also is completely silent on what his Report contains. This leads us to what is bad, very bad about this charade of Barr on Mueller.

    Mueller’s Report contains findings on allegations of the worst possible crimes against the state and against the American people: colluding with a foreign power to subvert elections to the highest echelons of public office and the most consequential institutions of American and Western liberal democracy. And on top of that, obstructing the course of justice. It is impossible to think of any crimes or misdemeanors worse than these two and indeed in American political and constitutional history, no president has ever been accused, credibly, of these two crimes – with the singular exception of Donald Trump. I say credibly accused because everything contained in the investigations was actually either said or done in public by Trump and/or his allies during the campaigns of the 2016 presidential and congressional elections. In all truly democratic countries of the world, not only would Trump and everyone connected with the actions and the charges voluntarily stay far away from the investigations, they would be compelled to do so. But throughout the two years of Mueller’s investigations, Trump himself and dozens of his surrogates were extremely vocal, extremely sanguine in their attacks on Mueller and his team. Only in America? More precisely, only in Trump’s America.

    There is a name, a diagnostic appellation for what has happened with and in the Mueller investigation and what is happening now, as the delayed release of the Report in its fullness: it is institutional decay of the highest order. We look to politicians and their supporters when things are vey bad, so bad that the rulers seem to be working against the interest of the nation and its peoples. That is correct and necessary. But perhaps far more deadly is when transindividual institutions don’t work or can’t work. That’s what is at stake in the unfolding saga of Barr on Mueller. We are familiar with institutional decay in Nigeria and in many parts of the developing world. The Americans are not. Let us hope that they will not pay a very costly prize for this.

    The Ugly

    Ordinarily, we do not think of ugliness as something alarming, something terrifying. But think of the following detail from classical Greek mythology: the head of the Medusa was so terrible in its ugliness that anyone who gazed on it had his or her heart turned into stone. Obviously then, the ugliness we are talking about here is moral rather than physical; experiential rather than innate. Welcome to Trump’s America and the great circulation of moral ugliness, of ethical ugliness as a tool of political and financial opportunism. The evidence is galore.

    Perhaps the most egregious, certainly the most blatant, is Trump’s complete merger of his personal economic and financial interests with the interest of the American state. His children and his son-in-law all use their connection to their father to make clients and benefactors of the family businesses to do their bidding quite openly – and often quite at odds with the interest of the American state or even economy. Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, is completely in the open about this, as he goes about the Middle East and the Arab world as a sort of American diplomatic ombudsman for the region, extracting commercial advantages from some of the world’s worst autocracies in return for shielding them from Western and world condemnation. At the height of the scandal of the murder of Khashoggi in Turkey by the Saudis, Kushner coordinated Trump and America’s cover for the Saudis. Please note that Trump and Kushner maintained that they were acting to safeguard Saudi contracts for supply of American military hardware, whereas Trump and his son-in-law were in reality acting in the interest of their own commercial and economic windfalls from the Saudis. A life, the bloodily severed head of Khashoggi, with the torso chopped into pieces for the hundreds of millions reaped by Trump and Kushner – that is the face of the moral ugliness at the heart of affairs of state in America at the present time.

    It needn’t and doesn’t always take such lurid, melodramatic forms. Indeed, for the most part, the form it has taken with Trump is the kind with which we are very familiar in our region of the world: filling cabinet posts and political appointments with kinsmen, friends, and business partners who are not only unqualified for the positions they are appointed to but are the very worst, the most mediocre and dysfunctional for their posts. In all of American history, no president has appointed more incompetent, lazy and clueless cabinet members and public officeholders than Trump. It gives no comfort to Americans that many of such appointees have been exposed and been forced out of office because no sooner has one departed than Trump appoints another in his or her place. As I write these words this week, the Homeland Security Secretary, Kirstjen Nielsen, has just been fired. Why? Not because she refused to carry out the monstrously inhumane orders of Trump to separate children from their parents at US borders, but because she wasn’t thorough enough in carrying out the orders. This is symptomatic of the ugliness in Trump’s officialdom: you must not hold back one inch from the lies, the deceptions, the cruelties of the boss!

    Nero. Caligula, Mussolini. Trump is in this faux-illustrious company.

     

    Biodun Jeyifo

    bjeyifo@fas.harvard.edu

  • Beyond lamentations

    Last week, when I wrote my piece setting an agenda for the Governor-elect of Lagos State, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, on refuse disposal, I knew I could not do that in one piece. Yet, I deliberately avoided numbering the write-up even though I knew I would not be able to exhaust all I had to say in only one piece. I now realise the wisdom in taking that decision. If I had not taken the road I took, it would have been impossible for me to suspend action on that aspect; in which case, I would not have been able to give today’s topic the urgent attention that it required.

    I had hitherto thought it is too early to begin to chart an agenda for President Muhammadu Buhari, and that that should wait until he is about starting his second term; that is all things being equal. But things seem to be getting out of hands, particularly on the security plain. Indeed, one good reason one should begin to set an agenda for the president is because he is no longer the action man that many of us thought he was. Some have even said it was his second-in-command when he was military head of state, the Late General Tunde Idiagbon (retd), that was behind what seemed were the government’s tough stance on issues then. The president has not confirmed this though; but he has confessed that age is no longer on his side. We saw an example of this on how long it took him to appoint his cabinet after the 2015 elections. So, it can never be too early to begin to advise a president who does not appreciate that time waits for no one. About 47 months ago, when he was sworn in as president; the president had probably thought four years was eternity. In the next six weeks or so, his first four years in power will be over.

    Lest we forget, I had said in one of my write-ups shortly before the elections that we first have to drive away the thief before returning to tell the owner of the stolen property that he too did not keep his property well. Meaning what? Meaning that  we should first support President Buhari to defeat the then Peoples Democratic Party’s (PDP) presidential candidate in the election, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, not necessarily because of any superlative performance but because the opposition party did not take its eyes to the market while shopping for Buhari’s successor. If it did, it would have come up with a more formidable challenger. But the opposition party knew what it was doing: it knew Atiku was the only person in the party who so much believed the party could win and was therefore ready to literally burn billions in search of the elusive presidency. I still stand by my statement.

    But there is one issue bothering Nigerians today; and that is security or insecurity, whichever way you choose to look at it. Honestly, President Buhari must do something fundamental and heart-shaking on the security question. I do not know what the president has up his sleeves; but whatever it is; he does not have to wait till he begins his second term, if only to ensure that more innocent lives are not lost to blood-sucking demons that are now prowling like hungry lions, ravaging parts of the country.

    The statistics are grim; too grim to ignore. From Kaduna to Benue, to Zamfara and other parts of the country, the challenge is the same: insecurity. There is nowhere that can be declared safe in the country today; not even the south west, although there is relative calm in the region. Killer herdsmen are still committing havoc daily; terrorists remain defiant even though the government and the military believe they have been degraded. Nigerians see the use of the word ‘degraded’ as pun; given the ferocious manner these killers keep snuffing life out of innocent Nigerians.

    We know that the PDP messed us all up big time; but much as we were ready to listen to this excuse in the last four years, it may no longer sell by the time Buhari returns for a second term, again, ceteris paribus.

    The Minister of Defence, Mansur Dan Ali added a new dimension to the issue, when he alleged that some top traditional rulers were behind the orgy of violence in the northern part of the country. Dan Ali disclosed this in a statement, on Tuesday. According to him, intelligence revealed that high-profile traditional leaders were culpable in the violence, which has claimed scores of lives in the region.”Recently, the government acted on the advice of the Ministry of Defence to suspend all mining activities in Zamfara State and environs following intelligence report that suggested close collaboration between the activities of the bandits and illegal miners.

    “However, in spite of the concerted efforts of the armed forces and other security agencies, some unpatriotic persons, including highly placed traditional rulers in the areas, were identified as helping the bandits with intelligence to perpetuate their nefarious actions or to compromise military operations”, the minister said.

    One would have expected that if the defence ministry had such intelligence, and it believed it to be credible, it ought to have gone after the culprits instead of warning them to desist. At worst, such traditional rulers should have been named and shamed. Nigerians are not interested in government or its officials raising the alarm where criminals are involved; they are interested in result from the action against the criminals.

    The president touched on a sore aspect of the security nightmare when he regretted that bandits have informants within some communities and that certain communities have signed protection deals with bandits at the expense of other communities, thereby creating complications and frustrating government’s intervention. It is the height of frustration and desperation that would make citizens abandon their government only to sign protection deals with bandits. It shows an apparent lack of faith in the capacity of the state to protect them. Yet, security of lives and property is the very first duty of any government properly so-called.

    President Buhari has said he was sad about these mindless killings. But that is not enough. He also said he meets with his security chiefs often, in order to understand their problems and needs. Again, this is not enough. If he is sure the government has done the rightful by way of provision of arms and ammunition as well as other needs of the security personnel, then he should know what to do if there are no noticeable improvements after all said and done. Nigerians are tired of waking up to gory sights of innocent children, men and women being slaughtered like cows for no just cause. They will not continue to have graveside orations and mere assurances of ensuring security of lives and property. The president should live up to his promise of  doing whatever it takes to ensure the country’s security system confronts these public enemies with merciless determination.

    President Buhari has to listen to the cries of Nigerians on this issue and do something. Almost all the sections of the country are crying loud, these cries are too strident to be ignored. As a matter of fact,  the president can only ignore them at his own peril.

     

  • Enough of off-season campaigning

    Even over one month after the presidential election, both parties still operate as if the election had not been held. It is expected that opposing parties would seize opportunities to criticise the other party periodically, but both All Progressives Congress (APC) and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) seem to have been making a career of castigating each other as if it is a democratic virtue to just talk ill of the other party. If leaders of the two leading parties are not tired of repeated complaints about each other, the average voter is, because the average voter is eager to see the blueprint for the next four years, rather than be subjected in the media to trading of blames.

    Although it is consoling that none of the two major candidates involved in the presidential election had engaged in throwing of brickbats at each other, several leading members of the parties have been talking as if the election is yet to hold. The APC is not tired of reminding citizens about what they believe are inadequacies of PDP while the latter seizes every opportunity to cast APC as a party that has robbed it of victory in the recent election.

    If PDP is eager to cry over election results while its election petition is still in court, such whining may be more understandable than hearing the ruling party at the beginning of its second tenure complain about how bad the past governments of PDP had been. Psychologists would have assessed PDP as suffering from negative emotions stimulated by what Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky once characterised as Loss Aversion, the notion that negative emotion caused by loss is more than double the feeling of pleasure produced by success.

    The latest manifestation of campaign after elections is the poster named ‘Pukka.’ Pukka has been reported as marketing the qualities of the PDP presidential candidate in the recent election and whose electoral petition has already been submitted to the election tribunal. The photographs reported to be in Abuja and Yola describe Atiku as the real and the right. But it is remarkable that former Vice President Atiku has dissociated himself from the poster. Spokespersons of the two major parties should not do anything to create additional difficulties for emergence of some measure of bipartisanship that can bring progress to the country after the courts have treated the petitions currently before it.

    Remarkably, the first statement of Atiku’s media adviser: “Our attention has been drawn to posters of Abubakar, presidential candidate of PDP in the 2019 election being circulated in Abuja. We disassociate the former Vice President of Nigeria from the said posters in circulation.  is starkly more mature and appropriate than the one by another supporter: “I have not seen the posters. I am just hearing it from you. We are not aware of it. aWhatever it is it not connected to the PDP campaign organisation. Further, disassociating the former vice president from the Pukka poster is more logical than the literal interpretation of the Chief Press Secretary to the Chairman of INEC: “Is there anything like party name or logo on it? If a poster does not contain any of these or ‘vote for a person’ the commission does not see it as campaign.” Elections are over and so should campaigns be over. It is time to allow the judges to concentrate on their assignments.

    Also inappropriate are direct and indirect references by APC’s officials to PDP’s failures, after APC had ruled for four years since Jonathan’s presidency and had also won election to rule for another four years. Ordinarily, the APC shouldn’t have any reason to worry about PDP at a time that it is planning to commence its second term four years after the PDP. After all, if majority of voters had believed that PDP had acted sufficiently in the interest of the electorate in 2015, the APC could not have been the party to produce the president in 2015. What then is the use of a party that had just won a second tenure to continue to paint the losing party as a problem?

    For the sake of the future of APC as a party that has so far acquired the profile of a ‘progressive party’ in relation to the PDP, the ruling party ought not to be involved in any blame game. It should be busy crafting messages that can mobilise all citizens toward to the Next Level, the new metaphor for proper and productive governance. Continuing to complain that Jonathan’s administration had about double revenue from petroleum sales during his tenure in relation to what Buhari has earned in his first term shows how the APC is yet to move out of the campaign mode. APC’s image makers are over dwelling on the negative (the failure of PDP in power) while it should be emphasising the positive: elaborating and popularising policies in plan for upliftment of citizens in the next four years.

    Another instance of senseless preoccupation with campaign verbiage is recent discussion by some northern political and cultural leaders. The new election-linked agenda setting has many subthemes: the claim that the North has enough votes to stay in control of the federal government without needing votes from other regions; the rejection of rotational presidency as from 2023 on the basis that APC as a party does not have rotational presidency in its constitution, just as there is no space for the concept in the 1999 Constitution. Popularisation of such motifs may spark new controversies that can cause confusion among voters who had voted for President Buhari under the belief that the presidency would move south and thus to another type of the many worldviews in the country. If the sermon that the North can rule Nigeria without the other regions is being flown just to test waters, it is an unwise sermon—whether the message had been constructed by APC pundits with interest in keeping federal power in one region or by PDP intellectuals with the desire to keep power in the North after 2023.

    It is not as if it makes any difference whichever region produces the president in 2023, particularly in a political culture that pays inadequate attention to how to stimulate and sustain a stable and harmonious multiethnic state and, in the process, transform it into a progressive modern nation-state capable of seeking and finding solutions to the problems confronting majority of the country’s citizens. What is worrisome about the premature discussion of who qualifies to be presidential candidate in 2023 is the nuisance value that such theme may generate.

    As if it is not bad enough for the three regions in the South to struggle over which region captures the opportunity to produce the president in 2023, those who have chosen to throw up the suggestion that 2019 may very well be the end of rotational presidency show little concern for its political implications. For too long, Nigeria has had to grapple with distractions from the most important goal: finding a political culture that can transform centrifugal into centripetal forces capable of creating one of the world’s largest truly modern multiethnic federal state.

    It is conceivable that the principle of rotational presidency may not be the best solution to the country’s many problems, it has since its inception in 1999 brought a measure of political stability, such as the country had not known until 1999. It may be too soon and too risky to throw away this baby with the bath water.

    Calling for cancellation of rotational presidency may feel unpleasant to many regions just as calling for restructuring has been to some regions since 1993.  There is no better time for patriotic Nigerians to urge promoters of rule by one region to desist from restoring monopolisation of power that spawned rotational presidency in the first instance.

     

  • What is it about political office?

    In the early months of his assumption of office, I was among some editors that met with the out-going governor of Ogun State, Ibikunle Amosun, for a briefing on his administration’s programmes.

    Amosun’s election was a welcome relief for citizens of the state who were not too particularly pleased with the former Governor Otunba Gbenga Daniels’s political activities which resulted in violence and attacks of perceived enemies.

    I remember asking Amosun what is it about political office that seems to change elected officials from what they used to be before they were elected and makes them to misbehave and refuse to take wise counsel on how to govern their state.

    I noted that the personality of Otunba Daniel before his election gave the citizens of the state a lot of hope when they voted against veteran journalist Chief Segun Osoba. Unfortunately, Daniel turned out to be an emperor who did what pleased him and could not tolerate any contrary views.

    Amosun’s response to my question on the day of the briefing was that whatever the matter is, he would not go the way of his predecessors. He promised to leave a legacy of good governance and be a listening governor.

    I was very impressed when one of his aides said Amosun’s goal in terms of education was to replicate the circumstance that made it possible for the governor to attend a public primary school, secondary school and government higher institution compared with now when private education was the order of the day.

    Eight years after, Amosun is leaving office embattled having failed to get his favourite candidate elected as governor. He definitely would not have won the senatorial election if he had run on the platform of the Allied Peoples Movement (APM). He sponsored a gubernatorial candidate and federal and state assembly seats against the All Progressives Congress (APC) on which platform he got elected.

    Even if his candidate, Adekunle Akinlade, had been defeated with one vote by Dapo Abiodun of the APC, the verdict would have been a clear vote of no confidence in the governor who had become law to himself and couldn’t be bothered about what the plight of the citizens of the state is.

    Some of his projects were clearly misplaced priority which explains why a number of them like bridges and model schools are in various stages of abandonment.

    Staff of many government institutions and agencies are being owned salaries, allowances and deductions among other infractions committed by the Amosun government. If he thought his last- minute efforts to woo the people he never reckoned with would make them vote for his candidates, he now knows better that power belongs to God and the people.

    Apart from Amosun, there are many other governors and elected officials who have betrayed the trust of those who voted for them like Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State and Abiola Ajimobi of Oyo State who also paid dearly for their disregard for the electorate in the last election.

    By their actions, many elected officials have confirmed the saying that power in the hands of those who don’t understand it can indeed corrupt. No sooner do they get into office than they become power hungry and forget that someday their tenure will be over and have to seek re-election for themselves or the candidates they support.

    The political setbacks suffered by Amosun and others should hopefully be a good lesson for other politicians to realise that political office is for service and not for personal aggrandizement.

  • It is crunch time

    With the Nok and Sokoto civilisations dating back to between 800 BCE and 200 CE and the Fulani Islamising Hausa in the early 19th century, (Sokoto Caliphate, 1803) even though Hausa aristocracy had accepted Islam from Malians as far back as the 14c, I have many times wondered at what manner of humanity now populates these once highly civilised lands who now daily slaughter themselves without let or hindrance. What exactly has come over Northern Nigeria? When did the retrogression set in and what exactly underpins it: religion, economics, ethnic hate or a lack of human feeling?  How come things got so bad, Defence Minister, General Mansur Dan Ali, could accuse some traditional rulers of “helping bandits with intelligence and thus compromising military operations”, and exposing the men and women of our armed forces to utmost danger? When did things become this bad in Northern Nigeria?

    Also, apart from the federal government, what  has the northern aristocracy – both traditional and religious – done  to stem this all-pervading mayhem –North central,  Northeast  and  Northwest, stop the killings, quit quadrupling  the appalling  number of widows and orphans and, for God’s sake, stop  remaining this humongous drain on the country’s financial resources?

    How does Nigeria escape this conundrum?

    We begin to address these issues today as the column hosts a very perspicacious Professor of Engineering, former rector of The Polytechnic, Ado-Ekiti, on a topic that bears relevance to these challenges.

     

    IMPERATIVE FOR A SOVEREIGN NATIONAL CONFERENCE

     

    Professor Olawumi Ajaja

     

    Restructuring, as a term has become rather nebulous, given the definitions now being attached to it by various persons. For some, it is resource control, to others it is geographic, while another group sees it simply in terms of power devolution.  Some months ago when the call for restructuring became  really strident, former President Olusegun Obasanjo was quoted as saying that what Nigeria needed was mind restructuring. We will have to await his further lecture on this but I am at a complete loss as to how much mind-restructuring he accomplished in his 12 years as the country’s chief helmsman, first as Military Head of State 1976 – ’79, and later, as a democratically elected president, 1999 – 2007.

    I was a pioneer beneficiary of Awo’s Free Primary Education programme into which I was enrolled in January 1955. Our generation witnessed significant developments in the then Western Region, among them the First Television Station in the whole of Africa. Other Regions also made remarkable progress in education and infrastructure procurement. That progress was made possible by the country’s truly federal structure which was, unfortunately, terminated by the military coup of January 1966. Nigeria’s growth subsequently became stunted, due largely to the unitary system of government imposed on by the military.

    The constitution handed down by the military, which we now glorify as democracy, has been aptly described as “militocracy”, which it actually is, in reality. Nigeria currently has 36 states, most of which depend almost exclusively, on monthly handouts, and tokenism, from Abuja for their very survival.

    The result is that the federal government, with its huge allocation of 56% of total federal revenue, is loaded with responsibilities which should rightly belong to the states and local governments. Examples include Agriculture, Water Resources, Industry, Solid Minerals and Housing. In my straight 18 years in Ekiti, all I have seen as federal projects are the Silos which had never been used, the Federal Secretariat and the CBN building, both of which have remained “work in progress” for nearly two decades. In spite of the existence of a Federal Ministry of Water Resources, taps in the state are drier now than they were before the state was created in 1996. The Ministry of Works, visible only as FERMA, is only seen patching pot-holes.  All these are the results of the federal government taking on far more responsibilities than it can efficiently, and competently, handle.

    As a result of an insufficient and epileptic power supply, the past few years have witnessed several industrial ventures moving out o9f Nigeria and relocating to neighbouring countries.  On account of  our very poor power supply,  textile industries, auto Assembly Plants, Paper Mills, Steel Rolling Mills and companies manufacturing important items like shoes,  batteries, roofing sheets, wire and nails,  which were thriving in the 70’s are today virtually non-existent; contributing hugely to the country’s high unemployment rate.  Decentralising power generation and distribution is now a must, if Nigeria is to witness any meaningful industrial development. Singapore, a one-city state whose population is less than that of any state in Nigeria, generates and distributes power so efficiently that it has not experienced any serious power outage in more than 30 years.

    The Federal Ministry of Education is overburdened with several Universities, Polytechnics, Colleges of Education and even Secondary (Unity) Schools. This is a major reason why education has been on a downward slide in the past few decades. The Universal Basic Education Commission (UBEC), a federal agency, superintends the funding of primary school infrastructure all over the country. This function should rightly belong to local governments whose officials, as presently constituted, merely draw huge salaries without any visible impact on governance. The United States, whose constitution we pretend to have copied, does not have a single Federal University.  According to the most recent rankings, 16 of the world’s best 20 universities are located in the U. S. and are all either private or state-owned!

    Another major feature of the present federal structure which is difficult to justify, given our parlous finances, is the Bicameral Legislature. Every bill that is passed in the House of Representatives must again be presented to the Senate for the same purpose. All functions of the House of Representatives are duplicated in the Senate. A single Legislative Chamber will serve our purpose while saving billions of naira which can then be diverted to infrastructure development. Moreover, the humongous salaries and allowances of these lawmakers as well as other politicians are out rightly unjustifiable. As we learnt from Senator Shehu Sani, a Nigerian senator earns more than N13 million monthly; an amount far in excess of the salaries of 25 university professors put together. It is, therefore, no surprise that Nigerian politics has become a killing field, with elections becoming mini wars as we recently saw.

    The security situation (herdsmen killings, kidnapping, armed robbery etc) which Nigeria has been experiencing in recent times has been exacerbated by the fact that the whole country (of close to 200 million people) operates under one Federal Police Command. The problems could have been more easily confronted through the establishment of a State Police, which would have a much deeper understanding of the terrain of each state. State governors would then become effective Chief Security Officers of their respective states, not in name only, but in reality.  The United States even has City Police Departments such as the New York Police, Chicago Police, Los Angeles Police, etc.

    The essence of this write-up is to underscore the importance of power devolution to the states and local governments. A unitary structure is antithetical to our size and diversity in terms of ethnicity, language and religion. The United States of America, despite its linguistic homogeneity runs a truly federal structure. True federalism will encourage healthy competition as it did amongst Regions in the First Republic, thereby engendering rapid development.

    The apprehension of a section of the country about restructuring is understandable since Nigeria’s economy depends largely on crude oil. However, with the 2019 elections now over, it is time to re-visit restructuring. Thus, a Sovereign National Conference has become an imperative if Nigeria is to escape the doldrums into which the 1999 Military-imposed Constitution plunged it. A mere National Conference, like the Jonathan 2014 national conference, will not do for some reasons. First, political parties which are not in power will find excuses to be indifferent, as the APC did in 2014. Getting the decisions passed into law by a self-serving National Assembly will be absolutely impossible, especially where it is decided, for instance, that we should operate on the basis of a unicameral legislature just as a law for single-tenure presidency would be resisted by a first term President. A Sovereign National Conference will comprise representatives from every part of Nigeria and its decisions will be passed into law, after a referendum, without being subjected to the whims and caprices of the incumbent Executive or Legislature. With Nigeria’s present structure, not even a saint in Aso Villa can make any significant positive impact on Nigeria’s development.

  • Security agencies probe Atiku’s alleged plot to stop Buhari’s inauguration

    Security agencies are probing alleged plot by the defeated presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar, to prevail on the United States to recognise him as the ‘authentic President’ of Nigeria.

    The agencies are already on the trail of members of the Atiku Deservation Group behind the printing and distribution of the defeated candidate’s posters in some parts of the country.

    The posters bore the inscription PUKKA, which in Hindi and Urda figuratively means ”fully formed”, “solid”, “permanent”, “for real” or “sure, authentic, genuine, solid and excellent”.

    It was learnt that the security agencies are working on a theory that some groups loyal to Atiku were out for subversive activities against Buhari administration.

    A part of the plot was to lobby members of the inner circle of President Donald Trump and the US Congress to delay its recognition of President Muhammadu Buhari.

    The agenda was said to be an attempt to stop the inauguration of President Muhammadu Buhari on May 29.

    Despite denial by Atiku and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), The Cable, an online news medium, yesterday claimed to have confirmed the payment of $30,000 by Atiku to a lobbying firm to “defeat” what it called “flagrant violence and irregularities orchestrated” by the All Progressives Congress (APC) and Buhari to compromise the presidential election.”

    According to a top source, the government does not treat the intelligence at its disposal on the engagement of the US firm, Fein & DelValle PLLC, with levity.

    The source said: “The whole script is about subversive plot against the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari. Security agencies picked up some intelligence and they are already investigating individuals and groups connected with it.

    “It is not a case of crying wolf or an attempt to intimidate Atiku. Some clues were presented to the Federal Executive Council (FEC) meeting on Wednesday. In fact, about eight ministers contributed to the issue to underscore the gravity of the case at hand.

    Read also: Oga Buhari, lamentation time has elapsed!

    “It was a resolution of FEC that the Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, should alert the nation through a media briefing.”

    Responding to a question, the source added: “What we have at hand points to a semblance of treasonable felony, but security agencies are probing it.

    “They are also on the trail of groups and individuals connected with this fresh plot against the government.”

    When asked of the nature of the intelligence at the disposal of the government, Mohammed said: “You do not expect me to disclose this.”

    Meanwhile, The Cable claimed yesterday to have confirmed that Atiku paid $30,000 to Fein & DelValle PLLC, a US firm.

    It said the PDP presidential candidate “sought the services of the company in his bid to unseat President Muhammadu Buhari.”

    The newspaper said: “The Centre for Responsive Politics (CRP) had reported how Atiku hired Bruce Fein, a former official of the US justice department, and his firm Fein & DelValle PLLC, in March.

    “In its terms and conditions for representation, Fein & DelValle PLLC had said it would establish and operate a situation room located in its Capitol Hill offices in the US and enlist the services of Lloyd Ukwu, a Nigerian barrister and trusted confidant of Atiku, to assist in the operation of the situation room.

    “The firm also proposed to execute strategies to secure the US endorsement of Atiku’s efforts to defeat what it called “flagrant violence and irregularities orchestrated” by the All Progressives Congress (APC) and Buhari to compromise the presidential election.

    “Twenty-four hours after the report was published, Atiku denied paying money to US consultants in his bid to dislodge Buhari, his main rival in the February 23 election.

    “But documents seen by The cable showed that Atiku paid the money to the firm two days after signing a 90-day contract (April 1, 2019 to July 1, 2019). He signed the contract on March 24 and paid the money on March 26.

    “The amount was budgeted for costs and expenses for the 90-day period. In addition, the agreement was for Atiku to separately pay all pre-approved international travels, business class.

    “According to a document received by the United States’ department of justice foreign agents’ registration act (FARA), with registration number 6654, on April 2, Fein & DelValle, PLLC, registered as a foreign agent for Atiku and the PDP on March 20.

    “FARA is a disclosure statute that requires persons acting as agents of foreign principals in a political or quasi-political capacity to make periodic public disclosure of their relationship with the foreign principal, as well as activities, receipts and disbursements in support of those activities.

    “The firm said it received $30,000 from Atiku on March 26, which was confirmed in item 9(a) under the financial information clause of the registration statement.

    “In item 9(b), the firm made it clear that it did not receive any other thing of value other than money from Atiku.

    “The lobbyist firm, a registered and active corporate law firm in the US, stated that the agreement with Atiku is in a formal written document.”

    In an interview with NAN, the Executive Director of the Deservation group, Dr. Sani Adamu, justified the theme of PUKKA.

    He claimed that Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, candidate of the PDP in the just concluded presidential election is Nigeria’s authentic president.

    Reminded that Atiku already has a case before the presidential election petition tribunal, Adamu expressed confidence that Abubakar would get justice at the tribunal.

    NAN said a search on the web address (www.deservation.org) shows Atiku Deservation Movement (Project 774 for Atiku 2019) with RC 1167591 with the contact Magaji/Sanda Ward Yola South Adamawa State as well as phone number and a mail address.