Tag: The Nation newspaper

  • APC to tribunal: Atiku not Nigerian by birth

    THE All Progressives Congress (APC) told the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Abuja yesterday that the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) had no candidate in the last presidential election. Responding to the petition filed by Atiku and the PDP challenging the victory of the APC candidate President Muhammadu Buhari in the election, the ruling party contended that by fielding Atiku, “a non-Nigerian by birth”, the PDP cannot claim to have had a candidate in the last presidential election.

    The party argued that by virtue of not being a Nigerian by birth, Atiku, a former Vice President, was not qualified to contest the last presidential election.

    It contended that by Section 131(a) of the Constitution, a person must be a citizen of Nigeria by birth to be qualified to contest the office of the President of the country.

    The party noted that Atiku was born on November 25, 1946 in Jada, now Adamawa State, then in Northern Cameroon, “and is, therefore, a citizen of Cameroon.”

    APC made the argument in its reply to the petition filed by Atiku and the PDP before the presidential election petition tribunal in Abuja.

    It said Atiku (listed as 1st petitioner in the petition) “had no right to be voted for and returned in the election to the office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria held on Saturday 23 February, 2019, having regard to the clear provision of Section 131(a) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN) 1999 as amended, which unequivocally stipulates inter alia, that for a person to be qualified for election to the office of President, he must be a citizen of Nigeria by birth.

    “The 1st petitioner is not a citizen of Nigeria by birth and ought not to have even been allowed, in the first place, to contest the election.

    “From available records, the lst petitioner was born on the 25th November, 1946 in Jada, Adamawa, in Northern Cameroon, and is therefore a citizen of Cameroon.

    “His father was Garba Atiku Abdulkadir, who died In December, 1957. Prior to 1919, Cameroon was being administered by Germany. “But following the defeat of Germany in World War I, which ended in 1918, Cameroon became a League of Nations mandate territory which was split into French Cameroons and British Cameroons In 1919.

    Read also: Security agencies probe Atiku’s alleged plot to stop Buhari’s inauguration

    “British Cameroons was administered by the British from neighbouring Nigeria.

    “In 1961, a plebiscite was held in British Cameroons to determine whether the people preferred to stay in Cameroon or align with Nigeria. “While Northern Cameroon preferred a union with Nigeria, Southern Cameroon chose alignment with the mother country.

    “The transition took place on June 1, 1961. It was as a result of that plebiscite that Northern Cameroon, which included Adamawa, became a part of Nigeria, and by derivation, the 1st petitioner became a citizen of Nigeria, but not by birth.

    “The 1st petitioner, therefore, contrary to the assertion in Paragraph 1 of their petition, had no right to be voted for as a candidate in the election to the office of President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria held on 23rd February, 2019 across Nigeria.”

    The party added that by reason of Atiku not having qualified to contest the election, all votes purportedly cast for the petitioners at the 23 February, 2019 election and as subsequently declared by INEC on the 27th of February 2019, are wasted votes.

    In a preliminary objection raised by the party, the APC contended that the tribunal lacked the jurisdiction to countenance greater portion of the petition by Atiku and his party on the grounds that the claim contained therein, which relates to the challenge of the qualification of its candidate (Muhammadu Burai) was statute barred.

    It added that by the provision of section 31(5) and (6) of the Electoral Act and Section 285(9) of the Constitution, the election tribunal was not the appropriate forum to litigate such claim.

    The APC noted that before the election, INEC posted on its notice boards personal information of candidates for the public to see. It argued that since the petitioners did not challenge what they felt was wrong in Buhari’s qualification at the pre-election state, they cannot raise the issues now.

    It said: “The petitioners failed and or neglected to challenge the validity of the 2nd respondent’s claim regarding his education qualification as contained in the Form CF001 submitted to INEC before the election.

    “The petitioners have waived their right (if any) to challenge the propriety of the information contained in the INEC Form CF001 duly submitted to INEC.”

    The APC, while asserting its victory at the election, noted that by the election results released by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and as contained in its (INEC’s) website, the PDP and its candidate did not win the election as claimed by the petitioners.

    As against the claim by the petitioners that they had access to INEC’s website, the APC said on its part, it never had access to INEC website at any time.

    The party denied all the allegations raised by the petitioners and faulted the allegations made against Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, service chiefs, military personnel and other security personnel, who were not made parties to the petition. It faulted the competence of the entire petition and prayed the tribunal to dismiss it for being incompetent.

    Continue in page 2

  • Court gives Saraki, Dogara, 52 others five days to respond to suit challenging defection

    The Federal High Court, Abuja, yesterday gave Senate President, Bukola Saraki; Speaker, House of Representstives, Yakubu Dogara; and 52 other lawmakers until April 17 to file their responses to a suit asking them to vacate their seats.

    An advocacy group, Legal Defence and Assistance Project (LEDAP), dragged the lawmakers to court seeking a declaration that they were no longer members of the National Assembly having defected to other political parties before the expiration of their tenure.

    The defendants comprise 17 senators, 37 members of the House of Representatives, the Independent National Electoral Commission, the Attorney-General of the Federation and the clerks of both houses.

    When the matter was called, Mr Efut Okoi announced appearance for the senate and the senators, while Safiya Mohammed announced appearance for the members.

    Both counsel urged the court to entertain their applications, noting that a litigant’s choice of counsel was his fundamental right.

    Mr Jubrin Okutepa (SAN), who announced appearance for LEDAP, said that the defendants were attempting to confuse the court by changing counsel.

    He noted that at Thursday’s proceedings, Mr Mahmud Magaji, SAN,  announced appearance for all the defendants and wondered why that had changed.

    He urged the court to ask Magaji to move the applications he had earlier filed and strike out any other applications before the court with regards to the suit.

    Read also: Why Saraki, Dogara are hell bent on installing successors

    Magaji, in one of his applications, challenged the jurisdiction of the court to hear the matter on the grounds that the plaintiff had no “locus standi” to file the suit.

    The trial judge, Justice Okon Abang, however, held that it was in the interest of justice to hear all counsel in the matter.

    He ruled that the plaintiff (LEDAP) was at liberty to reply to all the processes filed by the defendants on or before April 15 and ordered the defendants to file their reply by April 17.

    He said that any party that failed to abide by the court ‘s directive would have itself to blame.

    The judge adjourned the matter until April 18.

    The court on Thursday suspended delivering judgment on the suit, even though the judge said it was ready, in order to give the defendants an opportunity to file their processes so as to give all parties in the suit fair hearing.

    LEDAP, in their suit filed on September 14, 2018 prayed the court for an interpretation of Section 68(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution.

    This was with regards as to whether any member of the National Assembly who resigns from the political party that sponsored his election before the expiration of the term for which he was elected, automatically loses his seat in the assembly.

    The group was also seeking a declaration that the lawmakers were no longer entitled to receive any remunerations due to a member of the National Assembly and that any of such remunerations after their date of defection be refunded to the Federal Government.

    LEDAP in the suit also prayed the presiding members of the National Assembly to declare vacant the seats of the defectors.

  • Ikpeba: Eagles are in soft group

    1997 African Footballer of the Year, Victor Ikpeba has described Group B where Nigeria has been paired against Guinea, Madagascar and Burundi for the 2019 AFCON as easy.

    However, Super Eagles’ Head Coach, Gernot Rohr has revealed that Nigeria would play the Black Stars of Ghana and the Teranga Lions of Senegal in an international friendly as part of preparations for 2019 AFCON.

    According to Rohr, the game against Ghana will hold in Asaba, while the second friendly with Senegal is slated for Egypt.

    Sylla

    The opening match of the 2019 AFCON, which will feature the Pharaohs versus the Warriors of Zimbabwe, is scheduled to take place at the 74,100-seat Cairo Stadium on June 21.

    The 2019 AFCON draw was held at the magnificent Giza Pyramids and Sphinx last night but before the event, Ikpeba who was an analyst on a cable television picked Burundi, Namibia and Madagascar as the countries he wanted in the Eagles’ group.

    Ikpeba whose prediction was almost accurate apart from Namibia whom he got wrong, opined that the Super Eagles were lucky to be handed easy opponents in the group stages.

    Nigeria could not make it to the last two editions of the AFCON and incidentally, it was the Syli Nationale of Guinea that stopped the Eagles from qualifying for the 2012 Africa Cup of Nations after ending the qualifiers with a 2–2 draw, with goals from Ikechukwu Uche and Victor Obinna.

    Nigeria coached by the late Stephen Keshi, came back in the 2013 edition hosted in South Africa; after playing through the tournament with an unbeaten run, defeated Burkina Faso in the finals to lift the Cup for the third time. However, they did not qualify for the next two tournaments.

    In Group B are two countries; Burundi and Madagascar that are making their debuts at Africa’s flagship tournament with Burundi coming very close to qualifying for the 1994 Africa Cup of Nations, losing only on penalties to Guinea in a playoff.

    On paper, The Swallows of Burundi looks like the weakest team in the group but the fact that they booked a ticket ahead of Gabon that parades Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, one of the deadliest strikers in Europe, says a lot about how they have improved.

    Read also: Eagles are solid, says Osaze

    On 16 October 2018, Madagascar became the first country to qualify for the 2019 Africa Cup of Nations for the first time in their history, after they won 1–0 against Equatorial Guinea.

    They qualified from a group that had the Teranga Lions of Senegal with all their superstars including Liverpool’s maverick, Sadio Mane.

    Ikpeba

    The Syli Nationale of Guinea will undoubtedly pose the toughest challenge to the Super Eagles from the way they qualified ahead of the Elephants of Ivory Coast in the qualifiers.

    On June 10, 2017, Guinea humiliated Ivory Coast 3-2 in Abidjan and though they were held to a 1-1 draw by the Elephants in the reverse game in Conakry, they still went ahead to qualify as group winners.

    Their best finish in the Africa Cup of Nations was second in 1976. The team reached the quarter-finals in four recent tournaments (2004, 2006, 2008, and 2015).

    Last night’s draw was historic in its own right, being the first time that twenty-four teams will compete and in a competition taking place mid-year, away from the traditional January – February.

    Yaya Touré, the Ivorian champion and four-time winner of the CAF African Player of the Year award, was on stage alongside Ahmed Hassan, record-holder of the number of caps with Egypt (184) and Former African Player of the Year, El Hadji Diouf as well CAF Deputy General Secretary, Anthony Baffoe.

    Other CAF legends also in the Egyptian capital are Joseph Antoine Bell and Rigobert Song.

    Full draw:

    Group A

    Egypt

    DR Congo

    Uganda

    Zimbabwe

    Group B

    Nigeria

    Guinea

    Madagascar

    Burundi

    Group C

    Senegal

    Algeria

    Kenya

    Tanzania

    Group D

    Morocco

    Ivory Coast

    South Africa

    Namibia

    Group E

    Tunisia

    Mali

    Mauritania

    Angola

    Group F

    Cameroon

    Ghana

    Benin

    Guinea Bissau

  • SORROWFUL DAY IN BAYELSA

    It was a day of grief, tears and emotions in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, yesterday as the remains of the Government House Photographer, Reginald Dei, and a chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Seidougha Taribi, allegedly murdered by soldiers on the day of the last presidential election, were committed to mother earth.

    Taribi was until his death a Senior Special Assistant to the Governor on Grassroots Mobilisation.

    Governor Seriake Dickson, who spoke during the commendation service in honour of the two young men in Yenagoa, said they were gruesomely murdered in their own home by yet to be identified soldiers during the last presidential and National Assembly elections in Oweikoroagha, Southern Ijaw Local Government Area.

    A statement issued by Governor Dickson’s Special Adviser on Media Relations, Mr Fidelis Soriwei, quoted the governor as condemning incessant deployment of state institutions to undermine the peace and stability of Bayelsa for political reasons since 2015.

    The governor offered automatic employment to the young widows of the deceased as well as scholarships to the children they left behind.

    The grieving governor said the two corpses were clear evidence of the politically motivated killings allegedly perpetrated by leaders of the opposition in the state.

    He said it was absurd and reprehensible for criminals to be given security cover in the residence of supposed opposition leaders after allegedly committing brazen acts of criminality against the state as was the case in the murder of Dei and Seidougha.

    “Security operatives were put at the disposal of APC leaders in the state to intimidate, kill and maim our people during the last election,” Governor Dickson alleged.

    He described the burial of the Oweikorogha two as one of the saddest days of his administration as the duo were killed by soldiers who were taken to their residence by some Oweikorogha citizens to murder them.

    He said: “Today is a sad day not because of the very young age at which their lives were cut short, but because of the way and manner they were murdered in cold blood in Oweikoroagha in their own homes by uniformed men at the command and behest of political operatives.”

    He lamented that the main culprit in the dastardly act boasted that he would go to the residence of an opposition leader in Abuja to evade arrest by security men, as if Abuja had become a sanctuary for killers.

    The governor added: “The killers in Bayelsa are known and are protected by the agencies òf the Nigerian state. If anyone ever thought that all I have been saying about killers and their protection was politics, here lies the evidence.

    “The Federal Government is not interested in the peace, security and stability of Bayelsa. They want Bayelsa to be turned into a state òf blood like other states.

    “In Katsina, there were no killings. But here, soldiers were deployed for all  opposition politicians.”

    Read also: Photos: Bayelsa buries victims of electoral violence

    The governor urged the people of the state to remain calm and vigilant, stating that his administration would embark on what he called ‘the Niger Delta Movement’ to mobilise people in their various communities on how to defend themselves, since the Federal Government had failed in its primary responsibility of protecting lives and properties.

    Paying tributes to the deceased persons, Governor Dickson described Dei as a very good professional, dedicated member of the media team in Government House, and Taribi as a decent and honourable young man.

    He said that the late photographer drew commendations from even visitors and foreigners to Government House because of his devotion to duty.

    Speaking during a meeting with political appointees in Yenagoa, Dickson had accused the leadership of the nation’s security agencies of deliberately shielding the perpetrators of the heinous acts.

    He also described the gruesome killings as an act of terrorism against the state, noting that Dei and Taribi were not near any polling unit when soldiers were led to kill them in their residence in Oweikorogha.

    Dickson berated the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and its Resident Electoral Commissioner in the state for allegedly conniving with the opposition to subvert the will of the people.

    He pointed out that despite the sacking of Bassambiri in Nembe LGA, and failure to use card readers during the election, INEC went ahead to accept fake results to foist a Senator and House òf Representatives member on the people.

    Continue in page 2

  • Patience Jonathan: Court hears oral evidence in $8.4m forfeiture suit

    A Federal High Court Lagos yesterday took oral evidence in a suit seeking final forfeiture of about 8.4 million dollars, and N7.4 billion found in accounts linked to a former First Lady, Patience Jonathan.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had secured an interim order for forefeture of the sums on April 20, 2018, before Justice Mojisola Olatoregun, following a motion exparte it filed.

    Joined as respondents in the suit are: Patience Jonathan, Globus Integrated Services Ltd, Finchley Top Homes Ltd., Am-Pm Global Network Ltd, Pagmat Oil and Gas Ltd and Magel Resort Ltd and Esther Oba.

    On October 29, 2018, EFCC’s counsel, Mr Rotimi Oyedepo, had moved his motion for the final forfeiture of the sums, urging that the same be finally forfeited to the Federal Government.

    Meanwhile, defence counsel, Messrs Ifedayo Adedipe, SAN, Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, and Mr Ige Asemudara had respectively moved their processes in opposition to the motion for final forfeiture.

    On January 15, the court had admitted pieces of electronic evidence presented by respondent counsel, which depicted video exhibits showing various business outfits of the third and sixth respondents.

    The court had then adjourned until February 28, for judgment.

    On February 28, the judge had first dismissed an application by counsel to the respondents, seeking to set aside the interim forfeiture orders made on April 20, 2018.

    Read also: New judge to hear Patience Jonathan’s suit against EFCC

    Meanwhile, giving its ratio on the motion for final forfeiture, the court held that it finds the pieces of affidavit evidence conflicting, adding that same can only be resolved if the parties concerned are called upon to give pieces of oral evidence.

    When trial resumed yesterday, EFCC counsel (Oyedepo) called a witness, Mr Chukwuma Orji, who deposed to some of the affidavits, and he made adoptions before the court.

    Referring to his role in the course of investigation into the case, Orji told the court that he was Head of EFCC’s task force in Lagos, and named some of his team members as Ogare Ogbore, Idris Adamu, Abdullahi Tukur, Shehu, among others.

    He said that he came across the account of Global Integrated Services Ltd, A. M P. M Global Network, Pagmat Oil and Gas Ltd, and Margel Resort Ltd, adding that he also came across an account name captured as Patience J.

    Orji also adopted an affidavit deposed to by one of the team members (Ogare Ogbore), and an objection by defence counsel was overruled by the court.

    The witness confirmed sums of money lodged into  a  First Bank account, and also confirmed that the first respondent was a public officer, who worked with the Bayelsa State government, adding that he annexed documents to exhibit same. He confirmed that the monies sought to be forfeited by the EFCC are in dollars, whereas, the receipts of sale of proceeds were in Naira.

    According to him, the money being transferred by Bola Shagaya were in dollars and converted to Naira, which emanated from Aso Rock, adding that the same was from unlawful activities of first respondent. Under cross examination by the first defence counsel (Adedipe), the witness reiterated that he was part of the team of investigators in the case. When asked if he was aware that the first respondent was Nigeria’s First Lady under President Goodluck Jonathan, he replied ‘Yes’.

    On whether he was aware that the former First Lady had a pet programme known as Women for Change at the time, the witness replied that his investigations revealed that the programme was used to receive and conceal proceeds of crime. On if that was the provision of the programme’s constitution, the witness replied that while the constitution says something different, its purpose was different. When asked if the government of Bayelsa and Edo had complained to the commission that the funds volunteered to the Women for Change were by force, the witness replied: “I didn’t investigate to know if it was paid by force.

    ” On whether he knew if Bola Shagaya was a friend to the former First Lady, the witness replied that he only discovered from investigations that they were co conspirators. “Have they been charged to court?” Witness replied: “It is not my duty.”

    Adedipe then said:“I suggest to you that you are not a witness of the truth, ” and the witness replied: “You are wrong.” On whether the commission received any complaints from  Aso Villa about missing funds, he replied that he would not know as that was beyond his level, adding that he had seniors. When asked if all the donors to the Women for Change Initiative ever complained of missing funds, the witness replied that he was not aware.

    On whether he received any foreign intelligence against the respondent, he said: “I don’t know” and when asked if the first respondent was ever interviewed at any time, he said ‘No’. Under cross examination by counsel to the third to sixth respondent, Ozekhome). the witness confirmed that he was aware that deposing to an affidavit is a solemn oath. ”I take it that you are not Ogare Ogbore whose affidavit you also adopted, ” the witness replied ‘No’. When asked if the said Ogare Ogbore is sick or bedridden, the witness replied that he was not a doctor to know that and when asked if the person was dead or alive, he replied:

    “He is alive. On whether he had stated that he was a team leader in his affidavit, the witness replied that a team leader can aslo be one of the operatives. On whether in a statement obtained from Waripamo Owei-Dudafa, an ex aide to former President Goodluck Jonathan, or any other person, they had said they paid money into the account of third to sixth respondent, the witness replied “No, to the best of my knowledge, ” When asked if it is his grouse that monies were moved into the account of the women for change, the witness replied that the concept was used to conceal proceeds of crime.

    On whether he had interviewed any official of the third to sixth respondent to know why funds were paid to them by the NGO, the witness replied No, adding that the account did not lead to any of those officials. The witness also told the court that he did not visit any of the companies in the course of investigation because it was not necessary. When asked if he was aware that Bola Shagaya wrote a letter to the EFCC and if he saw it, the witness replied that he was not aware of the document. Hearing will continue on May 9 and May 13.

  • How executed Nigerian smuggled drugs into Saudi Arabia -Presidency

    The Federal Government said yesterday that drugs was hidden in the body of Kudirat Afolabi, who was executed in Saudi Arabia on April 1.

    It said Afolabi was among the 20 persons arrested with drugs hidden in their body parts.

    The Senior Special Assistant to the President on Foreign Relations and the Diaspora, Mrs Abike Dabiri-Erewa, told the  News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos that the clarification became necessary in a bid to clear the air regarding the circumstances leading to the execution of the Nigerian.

    Afolabi was executed alongside two Pakistani men and one Yemeni man, bringing the total number of people killed by Saudi Arabia this year to 53.

    There had been attempts, especially in the social media, to link Afolabi’s fate with the activities of alleged syndicates operating at Malam Aminu Kano International Airport, Kano.

    Read also: Saudi Arabia: due process followed before execution of Nigerian

    The syndicate allegedly specialises in planting drugs in the baggage of unsuspecting travelers.

    Abike-Dabiri, however, said Afolabi did not belong to the list of seven who are suspected to have fallen victim of the four-man gang hard drugs planting syndicate.

    “There are some people caught in Kano, but those they allegedly gave the drugs to are yet to face trials in Saudi.

    “What we can now do is to prevail on the Saudi authorities  that those people awaiting trials in their country are among the victims of the Kano syndicate.

    “If Nigeria can do this, through National Drugs and Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) and the Nigerian mission in Saudi Arabia, they might not even be charged to court.

    “Ms Afolabi was one of those drugs were found in their bodies. They were 20 in number. They are the ones on the death roll, as drugs were found in their bodies, including their private parts.

    “In their case, the Saudis do not appear to waste so much time on them. What is on social media that the lady could have been saved was incorrect.

    “There was no way we could have done that. She was found with drugs in her body; just like the other 20,” the presidential aide said.

    She, however, pointed out that in the case of those awaiting trials, the NDLEA can work with the Nigerian mission in Saudi to save them.

    “Who knows, maybe if the NDLEA forward their information to the Saudis that some of these people might be innocent of the crime, they might not even go on trial.

  • NYSC cert. saga: Court strikes out Shittu’s case against APC

    A Federal High Court, Ibadan, yesterday struck out a suit filed by Communications Minister  Adebayo Shittu  against the All Progressives Congress (APC) over his exclusion from the party’s governorship primaries on account of his inability to produce evidence of participating in the one-year mandatory National Youths Service Corps (NYSC) scheme.

    Justice P.I. Ajoku said the plaintiff failed to file the suit within the time stipulated by law.

    The APC had excluded his name owing to his non-participation in the NYSC scheme after graduating from the university.

    The minister subsequently approached the court alleging breach of his human rights.

    Ruling on the matter yesterday, Justice Ajoku said the case was not filed within 14 days against the provisions of Section 285 of the constitution that makes it mandatory for all pre-election matters to be filed within 14 days of occurrence.

    Read also: APC to tribunal: Atiku not Nigerian by birth

    He said:” Therefore, I will not bother going into the merit of the case.

    “Having failed to satisfy the dictates of the constitution, the matter is hereby struck out.”

    In his reaction to the ruling, counsel to the respondents, Mr. Adebayo Ojo, said that the law had taken its due course.

    “The judge acted by the 1999 constitution and it is a victory for democracy,” Ojo said.

    Shittu’s counsel, Mr Abdulhakeem Mustafa, (SAN) had tendered a 38-paragraph affidavit and 13 exhibits to support his claims.

    Shittu prayed the court to determine whether the action of his party to omit his name in the list of governorship  aspirants was lawful or a contravention of the constitution.

    Joined as respondent in the matter is the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

  • Zamfara tells Nigeria something far deeper

    ON Wednesday, during a town hall meeting in Zamfara State attended by the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Mohammed Adamu, Governor Abdulaziz Yari wailed that his state had been overtaken by criminality, with bandits operating from eight different camps. He estimated that some 3,526 people had been killed in the last five years, more than 500 villages despoiled, over 8, 200 people injured, and economic activities virtually paralysed. There was no local government in the state unaffected by the crisis, he added gravely.

    Early in January, Governor Aminu Masari of Katsina State, told the state’s security meeting that his state was besieged by armed robbers, kidnappers, bandits and cattle rustlers. Not even he was safe, he groaned. Worse, according to him, no part of the state’s 34 local governments was spared. His cry of anguish followed hard on the heels of the alarm raised by the Borno State governor Kashim Shettima who also decried the distressingly high rate of insecurity in the north-eastern part of Nigeria. With 16 people killed in February alone due to bandit attacks in Dalijan, Rakkoni and Kalhu communities in the Rabah Local Government Area of Sokoto State, Governor Aminu Tambuwal also lamented that insecurity had become a nightmare. He confirmed that since July last year, some 81 people had been killed by bandits. In short, the Northwest is in turmoil.

    Governors of some northern states and researchers and experts suggest that bandits had made a huge expanse of the region completely unsafe, with thousands killed and roads rendered unsafe for commuting and economic activities. Widespread attacks said to be emanating from the Kuyanbana forest linking Kaduna, Katsina and Zamfara States are reported daily, leading to loss of lives, abandonment of land, and cessation or disruption of economic activities. Repeated interventions by security forces, sometimes in unison, and at other times, singly, have proved ineffective. The insecurity cancer had been long in developing as a result of elite irresponsibility and incompetence over the decades, and is now obviously metastasizing. But rather than propose a radical and targeted surgery, together with wide-ranging socio-economic mediation, the government at the state and federal levels have stuck to a futile and reactionary application of overwhelming force.

    However, the problem is growing in size and engulfing nearly all the states in the North. The South is, of course, not insulated. Cult wars, armed robbery, herdsmen attacks, banditry and kidnappings have combined to make the region unsafe for living and business, and have become unpredictable. Meanwhile, the blame game has continued unabated. The political elite blames the business elite, and the military elite blames the judicial elite. No one is accepting responsibility for anything. In fact, with the recent killings in Kaduna and Zamfara, and the feeling of helplessness and hopelessness the tragedies have triggered, Nigerians are becoming totally despondent. In panic, the presidency has ordered a ruthless law enforcement approach to the crisis, but has failed so far to ponder why that approach had proved desultory and ineffective in past years.

    The National Assembly is not inured to the customary knee-jerk approach often embraced by the country when gory events occur in rapid succession. For example, sufficiently provoked to do some public good early in the week, the Senate made fine parliamentary speeches and ended up setting aside some N10bn in the 2019 budget as security intervention in Zamfara State — that is if the allocation is cash-backed. But what of the other states afflicted by the same disease? Both the legislature and the executive showed by their responses that all they think about is the quick-fix option. The legislature thinks in terms of throwing money at problems, and the presidency, which is in control of the security services, thinks of applying more force, more ruthlessness, to stanch the flow of blood and the relentless drift towards anomie.

    But because these measures have been applied in past years with immeasurable severity, but have failed woefully to have any major or lasting impact on the situation in those beleaguered states, there is nothing to suggest that they will work, having worked in fits and starts every time security forces were mobilised or deployed. With a little exaggeration, it is safe to say that the country is sitting on a powder keg. In fact, a little more indolence on the part of the governing elite will see the country careen into the ravine. The widespread attacks in nearly all parts of the country and the superficial impact the deployment of the security services have had on the problem suggest that the political elite have missed all the signals indicating the kind of trouble the country is contending with. But their misdiagnosis is unfortunately accompanied by the failure of rationality and character. The government has stuck to the use of overwhelming counter-force; and the rest of the country seems willing to sermonise over the problem, believing it is an attitudinal problem. Neither will work.

    It is understood that there are tons of position papers on the crisis, with Zamfara State alone acknowledging it had inspired more than 7,000 pages of reports on the problem, including how to resolve it. The academic community have also provided deep insight into the crisis, and have made far-reaching suggestions on how to restore the region to the path of peace and development. So far, however, the federal government has not appeared to embrace anything more than the panacea of strong-arm, military approach. Some analysts have suggested that if the government’s approach is to work, it must be accompanied by wide-ranging measures to eradicate the camps of the bandits, while a whole panoply of socio-economic mediation must be instituted. But given the depth of the crisis and its longevity, it is doubtful whether these measures can have more than a short-term or placebo effect.

    The crisis of banditry, especially as exemplified by Zamfara State will, however, not be assuaged by ad hoc measures. Because the whole country is contending with one security crisis or the other, and the military and police are spread thin in nearly all parts of the country, it is time the government showed gumption in examining other issues directly related or tangential to the crisis. The existing diagnosis is faulty, and the prognosis is lacking in surefootedness. Financial intervention is undoubtedly welcome, but what has happened to the trillions of naira allocated by the federation and budgeted in the affected states by their state governments? Can they account for and justify their spending? Would fresh financial intervention not amount to throwing money at a problem that requires fresh thinking and new directions?

    If military and police interventions have proved only partially effective so far, and are in the long run ineffective; and money does not answer to a cancer that is fast metastasizing, then it may be time for the government to examine other ways of running the country, no matter how badly the new ways war against their ethnic sensibilities and stale orthodoxies. The National Assembly early this week angrily suggested state policing as a way out because, as they put it, all crime is local. But deployed in isolation, even this measure will fail to have the desired impact. What the political elite do not want to hear is that the existing structure of the country is fraying at the edges, and rupturing very badly in the middle. It is time, more than ever before, to reconsider the foundations of the country and initiate a total reworking of its structure under a new and more effective arrangement. Tinkering will not mitigate a crisis that is fast building up into a critical and explosive mass.

    Between the past six governments, some of them military, the country has toyed with about three national conferences. Other than tomes of reports, nothing has come out of the fruitless exercises. However, the agitations have not gone away. What is even worse is that much more than agitations, the country is itself fracturing before the very eyes of the country’s leaders who see restructuring as an evil ploy to balkanise Nigeria. They are wrong, naive and impressionistic. If they do not seize the initiative now to conceptualise and manage the needed restructuring to restore the country to the path of peace and development, but prefer to blame political and traditional elites whom they say are complicit in the crisis, the time will come when the tidal wave of events will sweep them away and replace them with something not very pleasant.

    The population of young, angry and alienated Nigerians is growing at an alarming rate, resources are shrinking, economic growth is unable to match the rise in population, attitudes and values are shifting or even morphing dangerously, ethnic and religious relations are fraying, and the political elite insensibly and obstinately operates a costly, contradictory, ponderous and ineffective political system. There can be no worse recipe for disaster than what Nigeria is contending with today. Either the government does not know this, or it is too proud to acknowledge or care about it.

  • BBOG observes 5th anniversary of Chibok girls’ abduction

    The #Bring Back Our Girls (BBOG) movement renewed its call in Lagos yesterday for the Federal Government to launch a National Missing Persons Register.

    It made this demand at the commencement of a three-day global event to mark the 5th anniversary of the abduction of Chibok schoolgirls by terrorist Boko Haram group.

    The advocacy group is marking the anniversary simultaneously in Lagos and Abuja in Nigeria, London in the United Kingdom and New York and Washington DC in America.

    The girls numbering 276 were kidnapped from Government Girls Secondary School, Chibok, Borno State on the night of April 14, 2014, making Sunday, April 14 the event’s 5th anniversary.

    While 112 of the girls are yet to be released, others, including Leah Sharibu from Dapchi in Yobe State, are also being held captive.

    Tens of BBOG members kicked off the anniversary programme with an advocacy march from the Falomo Roundabout in Ikoyi through Osborne Road to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) office and back.

    The team, including a former president of the Civil Liberties Organisation (CLO), Ayo Obe, and the Executive Director for Enough is Enough Nigeria (EiE), Yemi Adamolekun, among others, presented their demands to UNICEF via a letter.

    It said it would not relent in its advocacy “and strident demands for the rescue of our school children and fellow citizens from captivity.

    “We also demand justice for the slain; resettlement and rehabilitation for people displaced by the violence; safe schools; and the launch of the National Missing Persons Register.”

    BBOG reminded UNICEF of its focus on promoting the rights of children in Nigeria and asked that the world body “should join us in the call on national, regional and global influencers and authorities to support and pressure the Nigerian government to bring the nightmare of school abductions, violent extremism and insecurity to an end.

    Read also: Chibok, Dapchi representatives visit Synagogue to pray for release of Leah Sharibu, others

    “Beyond your work as an organisation, you have also been a victim as your employee has been in captivity for over 14 months,” the advocacy group said.

    The anniversary programme continues today with BBOG sit-outs at Falomo Roundabout and at 64, Adewale Adenuga Street, Orilowo Bus stop via Binta International School, Ejigbo, Lagos.

    The activities will come to a climax tomorrow, April 14, with an interfaith vigil at Falomo Roundabout, Ikoyi between 5pm and 7pm.

    Tomorrow in London, a panel of discussants will consider the topic, #BlackLivesMatter and the #BringBackOurGirls movement: Online struggle for offline justice.

    This will hold between 4pm and 7pm at The Africa Centre, 66 Great Suffolk Street, London SE1 0BL.

    In New York, the event will be marked with an overnight vigil at the Nigerian Embassy from 10 pm on Sunday, April 14 to 10 am on Monday, April 15.

  • No money…no honey!

    Bees sting when they are threatened by the presence of a stranger, they suspect such is out to steal their honey…they wouldn’t trade their honey for anything because the honey represents their sense of being, sustenance and relevance. If bees could be that wise to protect their sense of pride I can’t understand why some humans would trade their “honey” for mere money. The answer is not far-fetched; Once the divine connection is altered, vision is altered…purpose is thwarted…destiny is truncated! When you don’t understand what your ‘honey’ is, you will become a servant of Money …unfortunately, money is a ruthless master. Your honey is what makes you “Dignified”…your sense of pride; in essence, our true wealth is in our sense of dignity which informs how we relate and work with others and ultimately defines the quality of the value we bring to the table. Money is fundamentally a means to an end, not the END… don’t be caught in the web of “If you no get money hide your face” rather “If your money is gotten through illicit means, hide your face…”.

    Prostitution is as old as the world itself and a lot of people wonder why some women and girls choose to sell their bodies, “honey” for money…If you ask me, honestly, I’m not in a position to understand. In a bid to satisfy my longing desire, I visited a brothel in 2017 where I had an opportunity to interview a commercial sex worker in her late thirties. Thus far, that has been my toughest assignment as I had to pretend that I was not scared of the unprintable activities going on in that environment. Many of the occupants stared at me…my gait sold me out…they put up pugnacious attitudes to declare themselves unavailable for any “better- life talk”. I summoned the courage to move on to the available one that stood at a distance waiting for a customer. I walked up to her and was surprised as she smiled at me and asked me; how are you?  I quickly replied,” fine”…hmm…the smoke oozing from her chimney was thick enough to be cut through with a knife. I told her my mission and she boldly answered: “ Me I no get time for this talk wey no go bring money…I dey do this work to feed myself and look good..abi…wetin you wan make I do when I no see better work do?”.  I took a deep breath, hmmm…so she is aware that prostitution is not an enviable work yet she stuck to it, and as I tried to ask her another question about considering learning hand-craft, she fled off to initiate a transaction with a potential client who just walked in. I wondered again; who are the men who patronize commercial sex workers? I think the media should tilt the scale a bit and throw the searchlight on their customers!

    Sequel to this experience, I conducted an interview on Engaging Commercial sex workers for social impact, on my radio show: Mindscope, with Mrs Uzoma Dania, Executive Director of Freedom Foundation, a faith-based, non-governmental organization committed to addressing the ever-mounting and staggering challenges of which human trafficking is a great concern in our society. I can never forget some profound statements, Mrs. Uzoma, made when I asked her a question; how can commercial sex workers be offered help? She responded, “ Only organizations or trained counselors are capable of helping them…You can’t help them until they are tired of the trade and ready to receive help… the real help involves detoxification of the mind, body, and soul. That’s what we do at Freedom Foundation; we rehabilitate them and prepare them for a new world of confidence and empowerment. It will surprise you that we have handled cases of teenagers. It’s appalling to know that commercial sex workers nowadays are not only at brothels, but many also are students in higher institutions, corporate executives in organizations …no matter your status if you need help, Freedom Foundation is ready to help you, contact us…”.

    Frankly, it’s not what you face that matters in life but what you do with what you face. Some people stay in hopeless situations their whole lives without ever making a decision to seek God’s counsel to get through them. Dear friend, you need to understand that what you’re seeing is not what it is…there is the spiritual dimension to everything in life and this is what controls the physical. Open yourself to God through his word…his words are not ordinary…it’s not about the power of positive thinking…it’s about the power that quickens the dead! Your faith in God will distinguish you in life, make you stand out and have what others can only dream of…it improves the quality of your life tremendously.

    You need to reconsider your ways if you believe that stolen water is sweet or bread eaten in secret is pleasant…sexual immorality or infidelity might seem like a sport to you, but the hard truth is that you are cheating on yourself. Here is a story that can enlighten your mind on what you really need to do;

    “Mr. A gets up day after day, dresses, kisses his wife good-bye and goes to spend another day at an unfulfilling but well-paying job. He longs to add something to his life that will restore a sense of purpose, but he believes that his present circumstances determine the rest of his life. His practical mind is telling him life may offer him nothing more than a stable marriage and a secure job that provides a nice home for his family. He doesn’t know that his authentic more looks like as he strikes up a friendship with a new employee…Sharon. Within a few months, their friendship veers to an ultimate relationship that threatens Mr. A’s marriage and both their jobs. Mr. A’s unguided search for more, thrust him into an extramarital relationship when what he really longed for was to feel needed. His authentic more might have come from teaching a class or learning a new skill for personal enhancement. He may have invented a device to revolutionize the industry in which he works. Mr. A didn’t pursue his authentic more with intentionality rather he slipped into a destructive diversion that only appeared to have something to offer.”…T.D Jakes.

    Seek your authentic more and make greater impact, there is a bigger footprint you can make during your short time on earth.