Tag: Theatrics

  • Theatrics towards 2019

    One of the signs of the times in Nigeria, as the general elections approach, is the accustomed penchant among opposition politicians to be nudged to read meanings, probable, improbable, logical, ill-logical, into statements and deportments, of members of the ruling  party. It is also time for the opposition to cook lies, applying glowing terms, laced with phantom statistics, and mount the podium to ram such down the throats of every credulous Tom, Dick and Harry. Lies, half-truths, propaganda, deceits, subterfuges; they all must come in handy now, even as the highest seat in our dear Nigeria must be up for grabs in an election all parties seem to regard as make or break! Any error in this? Doubtful! In politics, does the all foul is fair grundnorm not ratify Niccolò Machiavelli’s end justifies the means! Even in God’s own country, such die-let-live schemes have often played themselves out! In the heat of Trump-Clinton presidential election tango, while the Clinton camp released videos of Trump in companies of ladies of easy virtues, the latter quickly exposed a Clinton who had busied herself using private email accounts to transact official businesses while in office as Secretary of State to President Barak Obama. Although, much earlier, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, who had occupied same position, had broken supposedly official routine by mixing work and personal emails as well, the release might then have done not a little to sully Clinton’s customary saintly robe and possibly compromise her chances!

    In this regard, the scurrilous attacks by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and a pretentious pan-Yoruba camp of the Afenifere recently on vice president, Yemi Osinbajo precisely deriving from an innocuous statement the latter made during a visit to the Alaafin of Oyo, Oba LamidiAdeyemi, urging the people of the region to vote President Muhammadu Buhari in the February election to stand a good chance of producing his successor in 2023 may be anything but disappointing. Although similar statement had come shortly earlier from the Minister of Power, Works and Housing, BabatundeFashola, that of the vice president had drawn more attention, precisely because of the bigger weight of the office, the personality of the occupier and the fact that by 2023, it is thought the presidency would have become a straight battle between Southeast and Southwest. There is need therefore to clip the wing of the Osinbajo eagle before it flies or should it at all threaten to! Osinbajo, whose primary constituency is the Southwest enclave had spoken to a restricted audience in the palace of Alaafin, after a 45-minute closed-door chat with the monarch, encouraging his kinsmen to see their performance in the coming February 14 election as an opportunity to assure their assumption of presidency in 2023!

    Before returning to the criticisms of Osinbajo for canvassing votes of his western brethren, let us address two critical questions which jut out menacingly in justifying needs for the southern block to go to war to outdo each the other in votes! The first question is how much has President Buhari achieved in each of West and East and who should therefore return more votes as gratitude?; the second is what are possible interpretations of Osinbajo’s challenge to the Yoruba when he went visiting the Alaafin?

    Factually, the southern block has been a recipient of uncommon focus in the current APC-led presidency, a grace someone may say is equally extended to the North! Apart from and beyond appointments wherein the Yoruba have recorded unprecedented achievements, unlike in the immediate administration, is a list of 67 road projects, including 19 (!) in Lagos State, 14 in Oyo, 12 in Osun, nine in Ogun and Ondo. These projects, according to Fashola, at a town hall meeting in Ibadan recently, excludes regular and routine repairs carried out by the Federal Road Maintenance Agency (FERMA) and the building of five pilot housing schemes which is part of the entire going on in 34 states across the country. It also excludes completion of Ibadan-Lagos rail project; and plans to extend same from Ibadan to Kano. The eastern flank does not seem shortchanged at all in the harvest of projects! The region has received a total of 69 road-specific projects and bridges, all at various stages of completion, comprising rehabilitation of existing Niger Bridge and construction of the Second Niger Bridge, both valued in excess of N680 billion! Aside these 136 projects which, taken together, must have reduced the southern block to one big construction site, there are other projects which unify the two regions though, including construction of East-West road and raising power generation from 4,000 megawatts in 2015 to 7,000 in 2018, clear evidence of which is far much improved power supply across Nigerian localities, worlds apart from how it used to be in earlier times. Indeed, considering evidences, both regions have reasons to invite each the other to a race regarding where more votes would come to assure retention of presidential power by APC’s Buhari.

    What possible guesses could be made of the Osinbajo statement, in the light of current struggle over votes between the two major parties? One is the need to create healthy competition not just among towns in the southwest, but between southwest and southeast, given similar encouragement by Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Boss Mustapha to southeasterners, during an earlier visit. A struggle to outperform one another among the many towns and between the two regions may eventually redound to a harvest of so many votes as would cement resounding victory for the APC. Another possible interpretation is an underhand attempt to discourage opposition parties from making incursions into an enclave that is predominantly Yoruba where a promise of presidency in 2023 seems better assured rather than that of the opposition which would definitely deny them such. While further possible interpretations could be made, the decision of the opposition to remain one-sided in its condemnation showed neither maturity nor tact. To score points at times, it may show some strength if the opposition chooses either to keep silent on certain issues, however tempting or commend ruling parties! But Nigeria’s brand of opposition politics is to see and say it bad all the time. At the same event under mirror, Oba Adeyemi had waxed plaudits in honour of the vice president who he described as a brilliant and outstanding lawyer who singularly defeated the federal government in a suit instituted by Lagos State during Obasanjo presidency, translating to billions of naira for the state!

    What then is the substance in Afenifere’s statement issued by its spokesperson, YinkaOdumakin, PDP’s through its spokesman, Kola Ologbodiyan, OhanaezeNdigbo’s, through its spokesman Uche Achi-Okpaga, and that of a member of the party’s Presidential Council and Director of the Campaign’s CUPP/Inter-party Directorate, Sen. Ben Obi? Beyond opposition’s right to rant, criticisms of ruling party help keep the opposition in the consciousness of the voting public, even if for the wrong reasons, rather than genuine intent to present credible, evidence-laden, issues-based arguments to sway voters desirably. It equally serves a complimentary strategy for excuses regarding “how we spent the cash!” One pattern of oppositional politics in Nigeria is to say it bad all the time, but this time, it flattens out upon its own face, considering genuine, innocuous statement made by a country’s vice president and the deluge of misplaced drools it has attracted. The Ohanaeze even went a step worse than the rest in its release, saying Nigeria would remain “in abject socio-political, economic and developmental blindness until an Igbo man becomes the President” and that “anything done in Nigeria without the active cooperation and participation of the Igbo would always crumble.” How helpful to dreams of governing Nigeria in presidential capacity could such be, even alongside unrelenting, if pernicious, theatrics, of IPOB’s neophyte fugitive, Nnamdi Kanu?

  • A mornach and his theatrics

    No traditional ruler evokes extremities of criticism and admiration like the current Oluwo of Iwo in Osun State. Some of his online admirers eulogise him as “the funkiest Oba” and his childhood friends describe him as an extreme loyalist. But there are others who simply see him as a being full of theatrics.

    Observers on opposite ends of the spectrum would readily agree that the Oluwo of Iwo land, Dr Oba Abdulrasheed Adewale Akanbi Ilufemiloye Telu 1, affects a matchless brand of royalty.

    Crowned on November 9, 2015 as the 16th Oluwo of Iwo land, Oba Akanbi offers a rare approach to monarchy.

    Unperturbed by criticisms, the Oluwo argues that his era compares to none in the history of Iwo. And he walks his talk; for instance, his self-confessed passion for Islam and modernisation has seen him take on traditional institutions and deity worship in his kingdom.

    “They say that an Oba is ‘Igbakeji Orisa’ (second in command to the gods) but I am not Igbakeji Orisa, I am above them (the gods). I relocated the Orisa that had been inside my palace for more than  800 years and nothing happened; I am still here, standing,” he once remarked.

    Recently, he attracted flak over his alleged adoption of the title of an Emir and installation of an Islamic scholar, Yaquob Abdul-Baki Mohammed, as the Waziri of Yoruba land, attracted greater criticisms.

    By his action, he incited the ire of the League of Imams and Alfas in the South-West, Edo and Delta states. In a letter, the body’s President, Sheikh Jamiu Bello, emphasised that the Oluwo should respect the limit of his domain.

    “It is our considered hope that your Highness should as a matter of urgency correct the rumours making the round that the organizers of this event are trying to overblow the ceremony to capture the entire Yoruba land. This is not right,” he said. In response, the Oluwo’s Chief Press Secretary, Ali Ibrahim, said his principal had the right to install anybody as the Waziri of the entire Yoruba land, because of the paramount role of Iwo in the South- West region. “Iwo has been installing Oluwo with a turban and not crown for the past 450 years. No town does that in Yoruba land. What the Oluwo is doing is to establish a structure in Islam in the South-West. In the North, the Sultan is the head of all Muslims and Alfas there,” he said.

    Oba Akanbi reportedly justified his decision, claiming that Islam had always been a significant part of his kingdom’s historical reality. In the wake of his controversial decision, his critics and apologists are divided over its propriety or otherwise. Is he for or against tradition? Many feel confused about the monarch’s somewhat unpredictable disposition on this score. It would be recalled that when his wife gave birth to a baby boy in Canada on November 17, 2016, the monarch named him Oduduwa, after the progenitor of the Yoruba race. Apparently, the same Oba who kicked out deities from the palace has reverence for Oduduwa.

    And very few people would forget in a hurry, how he lampooned fellow monarchs and eulogised Northern Emirs. He reportedly said that continuing crisis had bedeviled the Council of Obas in Yoruba land and all his efforts to ensure its resolution had failed. “Talking about the emirship, do you know what happens in the North? Do you see emirs fighting each other? Because there is unity among them; they have respect for each other, they have love for each other. “But in Yoruba land, what I met on the ground since I was a youth, I have been hearing the Ooni fighting Alaafin, this one fighting that one, and so on and so forth,” he reportedly said. Reacting to his statement, the National Publicity Secretary of Afenifere Group, Yinka Odumakin, said: “I think the Oluwo of Iwo is not only an embarrassment to himself but to the entire Yoruba nation. For a paramount Yoruba Oba like Oluwo, who occupies a very important stool, to be doing all these shenanigans, is mostly embarrassing.

    We are not saying he should not become anything he wants, but he cannot desecrate the stool he occupies, to promote things that negate Yoruba culture and tradition for which he was sworn in as an Oba. The Obanla of Iwo, High Chief Abiola Ogundokun, who was a former ally, did not hide his feelings too. “Rasheed is on his own; nobody in Iwo kingdom is supporting him. We are children of Oduduwa, we are Yoruba. He (Oluwo) knows what he wants from the people.

    I don’t know where he got his own emirate from; Iwo has no emirate. He has no right to change it. Nobody can change our history overnight. We are not bastards. Only Oba Akanbi knows what he’s looking for; we are certainly not with him.” However, in a formal tactical retraction, Oba Akanbi said he didn’t adopt the title of ‘Emir’ but “only disclosed he could also be called an Emir by his Muslim admirers, especially the Hausa, who cannot pronounce Oba correctly. A statement issued by his press secretary, Ibraheem, said the report on his alleged adoption of Emir is a misconception of the media content by readers.

  • No to senatorial theatrics

    •Let those accused of forgery go prove their innocence in court

    A melodrama unfurls in the Nigerian Senate, on the alleged forgery of the Senate rules, used to conduct the election of Senate President, Dr. Bukola Saraki and his Deputy, Senator Ike Ekweremadu, in June 2015.

    After a rather lengthy investigation, Abubakar Malami, SAN, the justice minister and federal attorney-general, has given the go-ahead to prosecute the case.

    Being accused are Dr. Saraki, Mr. Ekweremadu, Alhaji Salisu Maikasuwa, the immediate past clerk of the National Assembly and Benedict Efeturi, his deputy. But for some delay, the quad should have been docked on June 21.

    The charge, more or less, is that whereas the last known Senate Rule was Senate Rule 2011 used by the 7th Senate, Saraki and Ekweremadu were allegedly elected on a legal instrument purporting to be Senate Rule 2015.

    Yet, there allegedly is no evidence of how and where Rule 2011 was amended to Rule 2015, since the 7th Senate was extinct; and the 8th Senate was just proclaimed, and its first official assignment was the election of its principal officers.

    The case, already assigned to Justice Haliru Yusuf  of the Federal High Court, Abuja, is a two-count charge of “Criminal conspiracy, contrary to Section 97 of the Penal Code Law” and “Forgery, contrary to Section 362 of the Penal Code Law”.

    But no sooner had the news broke than the Senate, as well as the House of Representatives, broke into a drama of cant, most disgraceful.

    Most disgraceful, not because the National Assembly reacted — reacting to public issues is a right under a democracy — but how it did. It gave the unfortunate impression that the National Assembly would stake its collective sanctity on the possible culpability of one or two members, even if those members are the senate president and deputy.

    Worse: it also gives the impression that legislators cannot be touched by the laws of the land simply because they are legislators! That is a fallacy that could have been comical, if it were not so tragic.

    Besides, the National Assembly appears to have sold itself the dummy that it could bluff to no end; and, in that process, subvert the due process of docking its members, accused of forging the Senate’s own rule.

    That much was obvious from the official bombast from Senator Sabi Abdullahi, Senate media and public committee chairman, threatening, pillorying and rather fondly pushing the doctrine of separation of powers, in a presidential democracy, as why accused individual senators cannot be docked for alleged crimes. That clearly negates what is trite in the Rule of Law: equality before the law.

    In a depressing resort to self-help and intimidation, for which the 8th Senate under Dr. Saraki is gradually becoming notorious, the Senate has even summoned the attorney-general to plenary, just as it indeed summoned Justice Danladi Umar, chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, just because Saraki is being tried before his court.

    Still, it is doubtful if summoning the AGF would change anything, for he has full powers, under the law, to order or discontinue the prosecution of a case; and a Senate flexing illegitimate muscles would not change that.

    Yes, there are talks about the alleged imperatives of someone, somewhere overthrowing Saraki and deputy; because of the controversy of their emergence. That is even the reckless Senate insinuation that the AGF is now alleged leader of such a plot.

    Such insinuations and counter-insinuations are part of politics. But they make hardly any dent on the due process of docking an accused person.

    At the end of the day, this is a criminal charge, which the state must prove before the accused persons suffer any penalty.

    That is why the Senate should quit these arid theatrics; and the accused, head for the courts to establish their innocence.

    Any other way would be tantamount to the Senate projecting a band that has absolutely no regard for the laws of the land, yet is bivouacked in the legislative chambers. Such an image would be grand betrayal of Nigerians who elected these individuals, into that hallowed assembly.

  • Aluko and theatrics of absurdity

    SIR: Sometimes I wonder how a man with PhD could descend the pyramid of honour to such basement as Dr Aluko presently exemplified.

    Even as a political jobber scavenging for political crumbs, there are threshold of nobility a man with family must not assail for the sake of his wife and children.

    The PDP former state secretary’s positions have been subject to several incoherent recantations creating a silhouette of a man bereft of cachet.

    Again if Aluko is Fayose’s political son as the two have jointly admitted, then it only validates the old saying “like father like son”.

    Aluko’s debacle is a reflection of Fayose’s paternity of irresponsible political denouement in Ekiti leaving in its wake Ekiti-gate, judicial rascality, legislative escapism and the imposition of Okada-concatenated hegemony.

    It leaves a sane mind in stitches how the so called “the people” being sloganized by Fayose would be so enamoured to mediocrity forgetting their heritage of scholarship and civility.

    One thing is clear: Fayose and his son Aluko are dragging Ekiti in the mud and the earlier Ekiti elders and traditional rulers repudiate instant gratification and the patrimony of stomach infrastructure and rein in the governor the better for Ekiti.

    As we speak, Ekiti State is not able to pay five months salaries of civil servants, the N5,000 social benefits legacy left by Kayode Fayemi for the elderly people have been suspended calling to question the supervening value of Fayose’s governorship beyond garrulous insubordination.

     

    • Bukola Ajisola,

    Victoria Island, Lagos

  • Theatrics as  TFTperforms  The Lion and  The Jewel 

    Theatrics as TFTperforms  The Lion and The Jewel 

    To mark Prof Wole Soyinka 80th Birthday, between July and August, The Thespian Family Theatre and Productions is performing two of his plays. The troupe promises a show like no other, writes Paul Ade-Adeleye.

    for the more theatre-oriented, the word ‘performance’ would immediately spawn erect ears and faster heart beats. Such was the anticipation when it was announced that to celebrate the 80th birthday of Prof Wole Soyinka, Nigeria’s only Nobel Laureate, The Thespian Family Theatre and Productions, an independent theatre troupe, will be performing two of his plays – The Lion and the Jewel, and The Trials of Brother Jero – between July and Saturday, August 30. As all theatre troupes do, the troupe promised to bring the show to you as never before.

    Punctual as a clock, the writer was at the venue, Freedom Park, CMS, Lagos, and strolled to the enclosure demarcated for the performance itself. Expecting to find an enclosure fully designed to look like a hall and eliminate all appearances of an open-air theatre, he was taken aback and sent a-pondering to find that the only things covered were the seats for audience and the stage itself. Wondering if this was in fact, a keeping to Soyinka’s depiction of indigenousness prevailing over western tradition, for traditional African theatre was usually an open air affair, he settled to watch the performance.

    Predictably, the play did not start at the appointed time, and there might have been many reasons for this. First, the auditorium was still as devoid of spectators as a baboon’s backside is devoid of hair. It could also have been that the producers were stylishly waiting for the audience to fill up. This situation proved that theatre in Nigeria is fast going out of favour because movie premieres at cinemas seem to pull a more punctual and populous audience.

    The play itself proved to be an eyeful. The director, Mr Toyin Osinaike apparently knew what he was on about as his artistic pyrotechnics reverberated from one end of the stage to the other, from the opening glee to the curtain call. As is well known among theatre practitioners, the course of a performance is usually determined by the opening moments; Mr Osinaike therefore, lived up to his name by ensuring that the opening glee was fast paced and exhilarating, even so that an itinerant photographer – obviously blown away by the dexterous display of dancing feet and drumming women as depicted in the glee – unwittingly abandoned his job in favour of greedily feasting his eyes on the sequences breezing by in rapid succession on stage. Not that one can blame him though; anyone with a good eye would have done likewise.

    Written by Prof Soyinka, The Lion and the Jewel depicts an outlandish school teacher, Lakunle, who is brains deep in love with Sidi, a village girl of Hellenic beauty. He wants to marry her, and would have successfully done so had he not been averse to the idea of paying her bride price. This may be as a result of his less-than-attractive financial situation, or his damning indoctrination in western philosophies, but whichever it is; Sidi will not marry him without a bride price and she even calls him miserly. A photographer has come to the village earlier and, bewitched by her beauty, has taken pictures of her and published them in a magazine. Baroka, the village head and unmitigated adversary of modernity has also seen the pictures, and like the biblical devil, who as a roaring lion, prowls around, seeking whom he may devour; begins to desire her for a wife. In the dark recesses of his mind, he hatches an evil plan; lies to his blabber-mouthed wife that he has lost his potency, and, as expected, she gossips this information with Sidi. Inordinately eager to spite Baroka, who she has erstwhile seen as a living god, she goes to seduce him so she can mock him when he cannot perform basic manly duties, but things go awry as she did not go with a long spoon to dine with the devil. Ultimately, the old rogue has a go at her and that proves to be enough to make Sidi a believer of his. She promptly heads home, bids Lakunle a cold farewell, and packs off to be a new bride in Baroka’s harem.

    Under Mr Osinaike’s direction, the first scene took off with a commendable effort to keep up the pace, which the performers had built already from the glee. Mr Patrick Diabuah, the individual who played Lakunle, a character Soyinka most artfully created, must have known he had a lot of work, and he pulled off quite an exciting performance, although a few glitches were to be noted. First, perhaps in his keenness to sustain the pace and obey the basic principles of acting comedies, he began to move and render lines faster than was required. In fact, he seemed to be acting in a dimension operating at a faster frequency than the audience, but being a ready performer, he must have noticed this himself, and, in an impressive display of theatrical flexibility, quickly recovered himself and soon began to draw chuckles from the audience.

    Now, whether by the director’s design or by the actor’s fate, he breezed around the stage again at the appearance of the village belle, Sidi, played by the comely Ijeoma Aniebu whose affecting beauty may have driven even a garden slug to feats of Olympian proportions, and, at the sequence where he was to collect her pail and ‘uncannily’ spill some water on himself, he gave himself a quick bath, and subsequently nearly flooded the stage floor. This proved to be a misfortunate occurrence as he was soon clumsily slipping up and down the stage, whereas he was supposed to be breezing around with grace. To pay for this water spill later on were a couple of dancers who either by design or by fate was left sprawling on the floor during a mimicry dance.

    Miss Aniebu, who played Sidi, also did justice to the character as she coyly swung her hips about; the effect of course was acted or genuine amorous displays of affection from either Mr Diabuah or Lakunle. One thing though, stood in her way – audibility. Her voice was not the loud type and despite her efforts at vocal projection, the writer still had to pay very keen attention to hear her quite clearly.

    While this did not slow down the pace; the director, who had every intention of justifying the amount charged for the performance, proceeded to attack the crowd scene where a chorus of vociferous townspeople were supposed to be singing and miming, and the performance seemed to be all roses and daisies until the entrance of Baroka, played by Mr Sobifaa Dokubo. The thing about this bit of the performance is that it was to say the very least, below relative par with what had erstwhile constituted the performance. The aforementioned actor is one who is said to have worked with the Nigerian Thespis himself, Chief Hubert Ogunde, and his theatrical feats have also kept not a few people enthralled. Alas, whether due to advance in age or by an ill turn of events in his career, his performance was arguably the chink in the armour that was the performance as a whole. The writer began to wonder if the veteran actor was a regular at rehearsals, and if he was, whether the director devoted enough time to personally work on him as every good director should. From his initial utterance to his ultimate action, Mr Dokubo seemed out of place with a character he was meant to be engrossed in. He fumbled for his lines as was noticeable by anyone who had read the play, and at a point simply began to render lines to the detriment of his acting. This was made even more glaring when one of the scenes that should have revealed his theatrical prowess, the armpit-hair-being-plucked scene, was thrown away once more as it lacked the proper comic elements to bring it to life – fast pace, classy acting bordering on melodrama and farce, infusions of slapstick to maintain consistency with the opening sequences, and last but most importantly, interaction with the audience. Mr Dokubo threw all these to the winds, and may have been undone had Sadiku, played by the skilled Mrs Lara Akinsola, not come to save the scene. She apparently knew what she was on about as she threw some life into the scene.

    At the close of the second scene, it became apparent that what would prove to be the performance’s Damoclean sword was the scene where Baroka would have to wilily lure Sidi to bed. So far, Mr Dokubo’s acting had not justified the appellation ‘Fox of the Undergrowth’, and Sidi had not yet come up with a trick to boost her projection. If both performers were left alone on stage together, it would require effusive thespian miracles to keep the play alive. The miracle was never to be as the sword soon dropped at the commencement of the said scene, and to prove this point, a quick glance round the audience in the middle of the scene revealed the tell-tale signs of a borderline blasé audience – mass usages of phones, and, even the photographer slowly came to life like a flower in the sun, except he was less graceful about it for he soon conceived it in his camera to impede the writer’s vision and concentration with his beefy frame and noisome clicks.

    To give the devil his well-deserved due, Mr Dokubo displayed remarkable presence of mind throughout. Any performer acting like he was on stage would have known he was facing imminent perdition and would have cracked open like a nut in a squirrel’s paws. Alas, he kept his act together, and by bumbling and fumbling pulled it through to the very end without falling apart, or if he did, he did an exceedingly commendable job hiding it from the writer’s searching eyes.

    Soon enough, the writer was salvaged from the hell of a graceless photographer and a bumbling actor with the reappearance of Lakunle and Sadiku towards the end of the play as they kicked up the action again, and, Sidi’s significant selection of Baroka, the action conveying the ultimate thematic preoccupation of the play, was well managed by the director whose job had thus far been commendable. He proved a ready manager as the crowd scene was well controlled with significant dances and pantomimes which hit the nail on the head as far as the subject matters of the play were concerned. Alas, he may have been a bit too industrious while depicting Lakunle finding some fun at the end with a young girl. Now, Professor Soyinka wrote it as such, but he never portrayed Lakunle speaking Yoruba at any point in the play and Mr Patrick, while playing Lakunle, at the final scene spoke Yoruba to a young lassie who had caught his eye earlier; a very significant turn of events which tampered with Soyinka’s depiction of western culture through the character of Lakunle.

    Finally, the managers of the production seemed to need some schooling on how to choose locations for theatre performances and I would recommend that they read up Stephen Langley’s works before choosing Freedom Park for any play again. Their decision seemed to the writer to have hampered the director’s work as he had to move the orchestra into the audience in a play that was not Brechtian. Not only that, they also sent Miss Ijeoma to the guillotine as she had to talk her throat out in an open-air theatre with heavy winds blowing and a mild rain falling.  To the Thespian Family Theatre, in the words of Ola Rotimi, if drama be the food of life, act on.

     

     

    • Ade-Adeleye is of the Department of English and Literary Studies, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State.