Tag: Tofa

  • June 12: Abiola’s rival Tofa kicks as ACF backs Buhari

    • Akinyemi: Opposition to declaration can’t stand
    • It’s political opportunism says Ango Abdullahi
    • Lagos, Oyo, Osun, Ogun declare public holiday
    • Abiola’s daughter: FG’s action politically, morally correct

    The controversy sparked by President Muhammadu Buhari’s declaration of June 12 as Nigeria’s authentic Democracy Day, continued yesterday with the candidate of the National Republican Convention (NRC) in that election Alhaji Bashir Tofa objecting to the decision of the federal government.

    He asked government to reconsider its position on the matter and claimed that conferment of national honour on anyone should be beyond some cold political calculations.

    A former Foreign Affairs Minister, Professor Bolaji Akinyemi, dismissed as untenable and a red herring, questions over the legality of the national honour of Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) which Buhari plans to confer posthumously on the late Chief M.K.O.Abiola, the winner of the election.

    Akinyemi, a chieftain of the pro-democracy group –the national Democratic Coalition (NADECO) -in its heyday, said there is no basis for such opposition to the conferment of the honour as there is already some precedence.

    Tofa , who placed second behind Abiola, the candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the election, said although he had been inundated with calls on why he was not listed for honour, it was not the most important thing to him.

    He spoke in a statement, saying: “Following the decision by President Muhammadu Buhari to honour my late friend, Alhaji Mashood K. Abiola (may Allah grant him peace) and officially recognise him as the winner of the inconclusive 12th June 1993 presidential election in which I was a candidate, I have been inundated by calls from friends, well-wishers, former political associates and journalists.

    “While some worry about the brazen one-sidedness of this curious presidential action, especially given the list of invitees to Tuesday’s event at the Villa supposedly to mark ‘Democracy Day’, there are also those who canvass that I be so honoured with a similar award of GCFR, if the motive indeed was noble and meant to serve the end of justice.

    “As much as I appreciate the goodwill, in this circumstance, however, I have to say that I would not accept it as it is, even if given.

    “While I do not begrudge the President his power to bestow favour on whomsoever he pleases, it is also important, especially for history, for all actions from the highest authority in the country to be based on fair play and law.

    “Needless to say, being one of the two presidential candidates in that election does not in any way define me or my achievements in life; it was not even the most important one.”

    “However, as I have reiterated many times in the past, I am grateful to the numerous Nigerians from across the length and breadth of the country who made enormous sacrifices in the National Republican Convention (NRC) as well as the millions of our citizens who voted for both the late Abiola and myself in that historic election.

    “Much more importantly, I am most grateful to Almighty God for the several honours He has bestowed on me; all of which have enriched my life.

    “As for my friend, M. K. O. Abiola, what he needs most is our sincere prayers for Allah’s mercy and the gift of Paradise for him. While some of us cherish his memory as a departed friend and compatriot, there are many who will continue to exploit it and to glory in it for their own benefits.

    “For those who may have forgotten or never knew, the late Abiola was a close personal friend of mine, a relationship dating back to the Second Republic when I was the National Financial Secretary of the then ruling National Party of Nigeria (NPN) and he was the Ogun State Chairman of the party. So, I do not in any way begrudge him the post-humous honour, even when I insist that the right thing must be done at all times.

    “Meanwhile, whatever may be the prevailing sentiment and politics in Abuja, the idea that June 12 should be the new Democracy Day is also a matter that deserves serious reconsideration. Such decisions should be beyond some political cold calculations.

    “Finally, like all, I am also travelling on the path prepared for me by God Almighty. He controls my destiny and I pray He will continue to favour and to guide me. All power belongs to Him alone. He gives it to whom He pleases and He has power over all things, including every ambition.”

    Why opposition to declaration of June 12 as  Democracy Day can’t stand –Akinyemi

    Akinyemi, in a statement in Lagos, advocated what he called a Dennington approach  “where determination is based on the need to achieve justice.”

    He was reacting to federal government’s decision to honour Abiola, his running mate in the much acclaimed June 12, 1993 presidential election, Ambassador Baba Gana Kingibe, and the late human rights activist, Chief Gani Fawehinmi.

    He hailed Buhari for recognizing the validity of the election.

    He said: “As a member of NADECO in its heydays when it was most dangerous to be a member, June 6 marked the fulfilment of dreams, and the achievement of visions.

    “On that day, President Mohammed Buhari recognised the validity of the June 12 1993 Presidential elections, declared Chief MKO Abiola as the winner of that election, conferred national honours on MKO Abiola, his running mate, Babagana Kingibe, the human rights activist Gani Fawehinmi and declared June 12 democracy day.

    “I recognise how momentous that decision was and I not only welcome the decision, I thank President Buhari for the decision,

    “President Buhari has addressed some of the wounds inflicted on this nation and applied healing balm on these wounds.

    “Only those who lost family members, those imprisoned and detained or who had family members imprisoned and detained, those tortured and those driven into exile had felt the need for some measure of closure. That closure was achieved on January 6 by the executive order issued by President Buhari.”

    He appealed to President to remember other Nigerians who “also played active roles in the struggle.”

    These, according to him, include Dan Suleiman, Ndubisi Kanu, Frank Kokori, John Oyegun, Dr. Akingba, Bagauda Kaltho.

    He said they all deserve national honours in future exercises.

    Continuing, Akinyemi said: “the declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day is a victory for all Nigerians and not just for those who voted for MKO Abiola.

    “The voting pattern on June 12 1993 sealed the cleavages that have bedevilled Nigeria since the unification by Lugard.

    “The annulment of the election results reopened and deepened those cleavages. I recognise and accept that the June 6 Presidential Executive Order has applied some balm on these cleavages and therefore should be welcomed as a national rather than a sectional victory.

    “The courage of the President in tackling this issue should be acknowledged.

    “As the Deputy Chairman of the 2014 National Conference, I recall that when the issue of June 12 was raised, it almost tore the Conference apart.

    “I also recall that the issue of June 12 had been raised in different sessions of the National Assembly without resolution. That it took President Buhari to resolve this issue is a manifestation of what social scientists call the Nixon-China syndrome.

    “It took a rabid anti-communist like Richard Nixon to extend diplomatic relations to China without the fear of being labelled a communist. It has taken a Buhari, who nobody can accuse of pandering to the South and who is trusted by the North to do justice to June 12.

    “The legality of the executive order which has been raised is not tenable and is a red herring. First is the issue of precedence. President Shagari awarded a national honour posthumously to Chief Israel Adebajo and his son collected it on his behalf.

    “Secondly, the award cannot be subject to strict legal interpretation. I would rather suggest a Dennington approach where determination is based on the need to achieve justice. MKO Abiola was elected in 1993 when he was still alive and remained alive for six more years.

    “That is when he earned the GCFR. Acts of illegality prevented him from being decorated with it. Those acts of illegality have just been annulled.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The spirit of June 12 is national. Let us build on it. Thank you, President Buhari for taking the first of the many steps you will need to take to heal the wounds that afflict us.”

     

    ACF gives kudos to Buhari

    The Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) however applauded   the President for the move.

    National Publicity Secretary of the forum, Alhaji Muhammad Ibrahim Biu told The Nation that the President’s decision is apt, arguing that June 12 is truly more relevant to Nigeria’s democracy than May 29.

    One time Vice Chancellor of Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria, Professor Ango Abdullahi does not agree with him.

    For him, Buhari’s action is nothing short of political opportunism, and the planned honour for Abiola belated, while a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Dr. Soni Ajala warned against muddling “the politics of the issue of the posthumous award of Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR) with the core legal issue of the politics of the award.”

    Another senior advocate, Mr. Femi Falana, said the president’s action is in order.

    One of the late Chief Abiola’s daughter, Rinsola, said justice has been done at last.

    “What the president has done is what justice demands. It is politically correct. And it is morally alright too,” Rinsola, an aide to House of Representatives Speaker Yakubu Dogara, told The Nation.

    Biu said: “The decision of Mr. President is a good development that would put to rest any ill feeling generated by the annulment of elections of June 12, 1993.

    “Besides putting aside the feelings, June 12 is more relevant to democracy than May 29, considering the likely victory of Chief M K O Abiola and Ambassador  Baba Gana Kingibe in the June 12, 1993 election considered by many Nigerians to have been the most free, fair, credible and peaceful ever held.”

    Asked about those linking the President’s decision to 2019 general elections, the ACF chieftain said: “people can criticize anything they like, but the honour done to MKO and others, is well deserved.

    “The posthumous award of GCFR to late Chief Abiola, and GCON to Amb. Kingibe would certainly heal the wounds inflicted by the annulment, including the posthumous GCON for the late Chief Gani Fawehinmi, for his tireless fight for human rights and actualization of the June 12 election of 1993.

    “So, this as far as we are concerned is good for the democracy and also for the unity of Nigeria.”

    Honour for MKO is belated –Ango Abdullahi

    Professor Abdullahi in his own opinion said: “If the President’s declaration is intended to honour Chief MKO Abiola, I think, it is belated.

    “So, I consider it to be political opportunism. If there is any Democracy Day Nigerians should worry about, it should be 1st of October, which marks our Independence Day.

    “So, I think it is political opportunism because it is belated. If not, why didn’t Obasanjo do it, why didn’t Yar’Adua do it or even Jonathan?

    “We have had three regimes since MKO’s death and nobody had the right thinking cap to remember the man? Or to honour him or remember the circumstances of his death until now? That is why I said it is first of all belated and in my own thinking a political opportunism,” he said.

    Speaking on the declaration of  June 12 as Democracy Day, Professor Abdullahi  said, even May 29 ought not to be Nigeria’s democracy day.

    His words:”why was May 29 Democracy Day in the first place? It was a creation of Obasanjo. Because that was the day power was handed over to him.

    “But, must that be Democracy Day, when we already have October 1st? But, because Nigerians always like to go on holiday, that is why they accepted Obasanjo’s May 29, which as far as I am concerned is the marking of his own history in the political development of Nigeria.”

    Ajala: FG must first resolve existing legal hurdles, reverse the annulment

    In a separate interview, Dr Ajala said: “Much as all patriotic Nigerians applaud Mr. President, for the bold step of recognising the supreme sacrifice of Chief MKO Abiola as the acclaimed winner of the June 12, 1993 presidential election, there are landmine legal puzzles that cannot even be cured by administrative publication in the Federal Government Gazette by the Attorney General of the Federation as directed by President Buhari.

    “I seriously share the sentiments expressed by Senator Ike Ekweremadu on the floor of the Senate on Thursday, June 7, 2018 when he attempted to sensitize the hallowed chambers on the complex legal issues intertwined in the gesture of Mr. President in bestowing posthumous award of GCFR on Chief MKO Abiola and the declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day.

    “Lest we forget, the presidential election conducted by the National Electoral Commission under the leadership of Professor Humphrey Nwosu on June 12, 1993 was annulled by a decree, duly promulgated by the National Defence and Security Council (NDSC) presided over by the Military President Ibrahim Babaginda on June 26, 1993. This historical legal instrument is very well to the knowledge of the presidency of today as it is  an open secret that the presidency of the day has one of the finest minds in the legal firmament of contemporary Nigeria.

    “Therefore, the unsettling question to dispassionate legal analysts  of the web of legal issues thrown up by the gesture of President Buhari in bestowing posthumous award of GCFR on Chief MKO Abiola and the declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day is thus; ‘Can something be placed on nothing and it’ll be expected to stand?”

    It’s validation of the integrity of the election -Falana

    Human rights activist, Femi Falana (SAN) said: “By declaring June 12 Democracy Day, the federal government has officially validated the integrity of the fair and free election that was criminally annulled by the Ibrahim Babangida junta.

    “By recognising June 12 as Democracy Day, the federal government has put an end to the hypocrisy of May 29, which was proclaimed by the Olusegun Obasanjo regime.

    “By conferring the post-humous award of national award of Grand Commander of the Order of Niger (GCON) the federal government has officially endorsed his enormous contributions to the titanic battle against military dictatorship and promotion of human rights in Nigeria.

    “In addition to the historic gesture, the federal government should proceed to adopt Abiola’s Programme of Welfare to Poverty and respect the human rights of all Nigerian people, which Chief Gani Fawehinmi SAN defended in his life time.

    “In particular, the federal government should mark the first national Democracy Day on June 12, 2018 with the release of all citizens being detained illegally all over the country and immediate compliance with all valid and subsisting court orders.”

    On legality of the national honours, Falana said: “The Honourable Justice Alfa Belgore, a retired Chief Justice of Nigeria was reported to have questioned the legality of the decision of President Buhari to confer posthumous awards on Chief M. K. O. Abiola and Chief Gani Fawehinmi SAN.

    “Curiously, his lordship did not refer to any section of the National Honours Act or any other law that has been violated by the President. In like manner, some persons have alleged that the June 12 holiday declared by the President is illegal on the grounds that the approval of the National Assembly was not sought and obtained.

    “With profound respect to the Honourable Justice Alfa Belgore, the National Honours Act has not prohibited or restricted the powers of the President to confer national honours on deserving Nigerian citizens, dead or alive.

    “No doubt, paragraph 2 of the Honours Warrant made pursuant to the National Honours Act provides that “a person shall be appointed to a particular rank of an Order when he receives from the President in person, at an investiture held for the purpose…”

    “But paragraph 3 thereof has given the President the unqualified discretion “to dispense with the requirement of paragraph 2 in such manner as may be specified in the direction.”

    “Therefore, since the national awards conferred on Chief Abiola and Chief Fawehinmi cannot be received by them in person the President may permit their family members to receive same on their behalf.

    “Furthermore, section 2 (1) of the Public Holidays Act stipulates that in addition to the holidays mentioned in the Schedule to the Act, the President may appoint a special day to be kept as a public holiday either throughout Nigeria or in any part thereof.

    “It is crystal clear that the President is not required by law to seek and obtain the approval of the National Assembly before declaring a public holiday in the country.”

    “In view of the combined effect of the National Honours Act and the Public Holidays Act the legal validity of the well deserved awards and the historic holiday has not been impugned in any manner whatsoever.”

    A lecturer in the Department of Law University of Lagos (UNILAG), Mr.Wahab Shittu, is in agreement with Falana on the declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day and conferment of Post-Humous honours on Abiola and Gani Fawehinmi, saying: “both actions are legal because the Honour Acts and Holiday Acts say the President has the prerogative to declare any day as public holiday and give national honours to whoever he deems fit.

    “The honourees can also send representations to receive the awards on their behalves. The declaration of June 12 as Democracy Day is a result of popular clamour over the years. It is consistent with people’s yearnings and agitation for years.

    “We all know Abiola made huge sacrifices for the democracy we all enjoy today and is a fitting awardee. I think we should all commend the administration for taking the measures, which are clearly in order.”

    On whether the moves could have been politically-motivated, he said: “Whatever motivation is inconsequential and immaterial because people will always read motives to whatever action one takes.

    “What is important is to find it the actions were in response to public agitations and in the interest of all. Once that has been proven, whatever motivation people want to read into it is immaterial.”

    Buhari’s action is polically, morally correct, says Rinsola Abiola

    Rinsola Abiola  hailed Buhari for doing the right thing at long last.

    “It’s not just a political matter, it’s a moral issue,” she said.

    She added: “my father laid down his life for the freedom of this country and her citizens and what the president has done is what justice demands. It is politically correct.

    “And it is morally alright too. We are happy that he has been recognised at last for laying down his life for democracy in Nigeria.

    “It’s going to be 20 years since daddy passed away in July; two whole decades. This is coming really late but better late than never.

    “The fact that some people refused to acknowledge the truth doesn’t mean others won’t do the right thing. For whatever reason you think it is, it took 20 years and others could have done this but they didn’t.”

     

     

  • Tofa hails five governors

    Tofa hails five governors

    A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and former presidential candidate of the defunct National Republican Convention (NRC), Alhaji Bashir Tofa, has hailed the defection of five Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors to the APC.

    He described it as a relief to people who crave a change in the country.

    Tofa said the defection was in the best interest of democracy and good governance.

    Urging the APC to be accommodating, he said: “Now, the hard work must begin and the best place to start is by sustaining a level playing field and internal democracy in the APC.

    “Everybody must be allowed to aspire to any position he/she wishes without impediments. Zoning, especially of the presidency, must not be mentioned at all in the APC. Let every Nigerian feel free to contest any position he/she likes and let the delegates be the judge.

    “The incoming governors and their supporters must have the same rights and opportunities as old members. We must all see ourselves as members of the APC, without the label of our former parties or factions. We in Kano, as I hope in other states, will welcome our brothers and sisters into the fold.

    “I am optimistic that with the gallant act by these patriotic governors and their supporters, the beginning of the end of PDP rule is clearly in sight. I hope we will not bungle the opportunity by selfish impositions and lack of patience.”

  • Tofa backs Akande as APC chairman

    The presidential candidate of the defunct National Republican Convention (NRC) in the June 12, 1993 election, Alhaji Bashir Tofa, has hailed the recent nomination of the interim leaders of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

    He said the future of the new party is bright.

    Tofa, who described the interim chairman, Chief Bisi Akande, as a gentleman of impeccable character, incredible humility and integrity, said the former Osun State governor’s wealth of experience as well as his sense of fairness and justice would enable him to lead the party effectively.

    Re-affirming the fitness and confidence he has in those nominated to hold various positions in the APC, Tofa expressed confidence that Chief Akande would deliver the new party’s interim chairman.

    In a statement yesterday in Kano, Tofa noted that Akande has consistently piloted the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) to its enviable position in the nation’s political landscape.

    He said: “What I must advise is that these interim leaders, who are among the best fruits of the party, must be encouraged to contest those or other positions at the National Convention. There cannot, for example, be a better Publicity Secretary than Lai Mohammed. The fact that they are the interim leaders now, must not be a reason to preclude them from the next permanent executive of the party.”

     

  • Bashir Tofa:  What  manner of man?

    Bashir Tofa: What manner of man?

    In formal terms, Bashir Tofa was one of the principal figures in the June 12, 1993, presidential election debacle. As candidate and standard-bearer of the National Republican Convention (NRC), one of the two officially recognised official political parties, he shared the spotlight with the candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP), Bashorun MKO Abiola.

    Few outside Kano and the business community knew much about Tofa until he was catapulted to head the NRC ticket by the not-so-hidden hands of the grand manipulator in Aso Rock and his proxies, as an element in their secret agenda. The intelligence at the time was that military president Ibrahim Babangida would seize on some gaps in Tofa’s résumé to void the election if, as per his calculation, Tofa won. And Tofa would not be in a position to cause a stir.

    Secret agenda or no secret agenda, foil or no foil, Tofa grew quickly into the role of presidential candidate, criss-crossing the country in a spirited campaign. One element of that campaign clings in my memory. It was a television commercial in which a man wearing an upturned collar and black suit led an energetic crowd whose attires reflected the nation’s ethnic diversity to chant “Tofa is the answer.” Billboards dotting the landscape carried the same message.

    Even more memorable was the televised debate between Tofa and Abiola, staged by the NTA and moderated by its senior programme executive, Dr Biodun Sotumbi. Oil pricing came up, naturally, in the wake of yet another threat to cut a phantom gasoline subsidy. Tofa, it turned out, did not even know the pump price of a gallon of petrol.

    There was something of a cad about him. But his performance was on the whole passable. Among major commentators, only MCK Ajuluchukwu thought Tofa had “won” the debate.

    For Nigerians weary of the bitterness and the stubborn refusal to accept defeat that had been prominent features of Nigerian politics, I suspect that the high point of the debate came at the very end. Abiola and Tofa shook hands and pledged to abide by the result of the election, no matter how it turned.

    This, then, was going to be a different election. The political transition programme, despite its manifest flaws, might yet inaugurate a new political era.

    It was not to be.

    Abiola won outright in 18 states, including Tofa’s home state, Kano. He also won more than one-fourth of the votes cast in all but two or three of the remaining 14 states.

    This was the most decisive victory in Nigeria’s history, in what local and foreign observers ranked among the cleanest they had witnessed anywhere and also, I fear, the fairest and freest my generation will ever know.

    The National Electoral Commission had named a chief returning officer, signalling that it was set to declare a winner.

    In keeping with Tofa’s pledge, his camp has assembled to put the finishing touches to a statement conceding defeat when, according to Dr Doyin Okape, NRC’s national publicity secretary, Tofa’s cell phone rang. Tofa responded in Hausa to the call, which he said was from “the Villa,” and then retreated to a private room where he and the caller continued their conversation, in Hausa.

    Emerging some 30 minutes later, Tofa was a changed man. Gone from his countenance was any trace of a willingness to concede, or even compromise. In its place, defiance, and grim determination.

    The concession was never made. Instead, calls for voiding the poll, for reasons ranging from the infantile to the spurious, poured forth from the NRC camp.

    Babangida gladly obliged.

    Abiola’s camp, propelled by the umbrella organisation NADECO, mounted a campaign of protest and resistance that shook Nigeria to its fragile roots.

    Tofa slunk into the obscurity from which he had been plucked. Never has a principal actor in an epic drama faded so quickly from the scene, unremarked and unremembered.

    Sometime in 1997, Tofa’s handlers inveigled or bribed some rogue elements in the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations into inviting Tofa to address that prestigious bastion of America’s foreign policy establishment.

    Compounding his fecklessness with mendacity, Tofa declared with a straight face that he, not Abiola, had won the election – a claim he had never made at home — and that he had accepted the annulment in the national interest

    Year after year, as those who hold that governance should be based on the consent of the people rather than the caprice of a cabal celebrated the June 12 anniversary, Tofa kept denouncing the occasion.

    He was at  it again last week.

    The brutal and thieving dictator, Sani Abacha, of frightful memory, had called the election a “watershed.” In a shameless and self-serving retreat with few parallels here or anywhere, the annuller himself, General Babangida, had called the election the best in Nigeria’s history and claimed the credit for organising it.

    Fifteen years after the election, its chief umpire, Humphrey Nwosu, freed finally from the oath of silence the annullers had worn him to, published the official results. Abiola had won, in the manner that election returns awaiting official certification had indicated.

    As if to secure his place in the hall of infamy even as other authors and enablers of the annulment were seeking desperately to extricate themselves from that gallery, Tofa declared, on the 20th anniversary of the historic election, that “June 12” is dead, that its celebration is a “fiction.”

    “I am not one of those people that celebrate fiction that is the more reason why I don’t like to be talking again on June 12 presidential election,” he told journalists in Kano.

    “Only those who don’t have anything to offer to this country to move forward can still be talking about June 12 presidential elections.

    “If you have learnt any lesson out of it, well; if you have not, keep quiet, let this country make progress. But for one to still be talking about something that occurred 20 years ago, is colossal waste of time.”

    This is the quality of mind of a man whom the manipulators of the transition program judged fit to be president, the man who had a statistical chance of being elected to that office but chose to connive in the annulment of the election.

    I stated earlier that there was something of the cad in Tofa.

    On June 12, 1993, he traipsed from one voting booth to another in his Kano constituency in a vain hope of casting his ballot. His name was not on any of the books. Apparently, he had not even bothered to register to vote.

    Down the ages, history will remember him, but only as a contemptible footnote to “June 12.”

     

  • Re: Tofa and the ghost of June 12

    SIR: I refer to The Nation’s Hardball of Wednesday June 12 where-in, Bashir Usman Tofa, the failed presidential candidate of N.R.C. was reported to have described June 12 as fiction and dismissed those still celebrating the dead issue as ‘idle’. Certainly, only men with dead conscience and expired mental engine can make such reckless remark. The man who lost in his own state in an election adjudged to be the only free, fair and credible election in Nigeria is yet to accept defeat 20 years later. Oh what a pity!

    It is not my intent to join issue with Tofa, but I want to place on indelible record that he is just too little to be-little the ideas and symbol of June 12. Tofa by his comment epitomize the real challenge of our electoral democracy. His type only believes that elections are fair and free only when they win. I think loser’s like Tofa who lacks the intellectual capacity to understand what June 12 represents need to go back to school to strengthen their weak academic medulla oblongata with democratic studies. While the rest of us who know what June 12 stood for, should continue to spread the gospel of free, fair and credible election in Nigeria.

    We must not forget to tell Tofa that June 12 reminds us of how Nigerians, for the first and only time, refused to be influenced by ethnicity, culture, religion, north and south dichotomy and other social divides to cast their votes for their preferred candidate. The day also accentuates the unity and oneness of Nigerians in our history. Tofa can’t understand and he will never understand just because he was the loser. I wish to join the army of responsible Nigerians to call for the recognition of June 12. As I urge the National Assembly and Presidency to act accordingly, least the likes of Tofa stop at nothing to desecrate the day which reminds us of the fact that the things that binds us together is much greater than what can drive us apart.

    May the ghost of June 12 haunt the likes of Tofa and killers of June 12 till death.

    • Godfrey Ehi .O.,

    Benin City, Edo State.

  • Tofa and the ghost of June 12

    TODAY marks 20 years since the result of the presidential elections won by the candidate of the defunct Social Democratic Party (SDP), Chief M.K.O. Abiola, was annulled by then President Ibrahim Babangida.

    The events of June 12, 1993 traumatised a nation struggling for balance. Part of the scandal lay in the fact that the military authorities were never able to dredge up a rational excuse for cancelling what has come to hailed as one of the fairest and freest electoral exercises in Nigerian history.

    So instead of receiving acclaim for conducting such a poll, Babangida who signed off on the diabolical directive to scuttle a transition process on which billions had been spent, has been burying his head in shame ever since. Stopping short of apologizing for a treasonable act against the people of this country, he has managed to say he took responsibility for the action.

    But just as the name of former United States President, Richard Nixon, will forever be overshadowed by the disastrous legacy of Watergate; everything that Babangida achieved in his nine odd years in office – even the irony of superintending one of the freest polls in our history – will always be stained by the date “June 12.”

    The former military president does not deny that an election took place on that day. If the event were “fictitious” then there would have been no need to annul a “fiction.” Instead, he has over the years tried to justify the annulment by claiming he was blackmailed into doing so. At other times he would hint darkly that allowing the result of the poll to stand would have resulted in dire consequences for Nigeria.

    For another central figure in the bizzare events of 20 years ago, the chairman of the defunct National Electoral Commission (NEC), Prof Humphrey Nwosu, the scuttling of his crowning achievement by the casual decree of one military dictator, was no fiction.

    So devastated was he that for 15 years he disappeared from public view . His vow of silence was only broken in 2008 when he emerged to confirm the obvious – that Abiola won the election fair and square. For him the matter was no “fiction” otherwise he would not have written a book about it.

    Of all the major players of that sordid chapter of Nigeria’s political history, only one figure remains resolute in living in denial – the former presidential candidate of the defunct National Republican Convention, (NRC), Alhaji Bashir Usman Tofa – Abiola’s opponent.

    Addressing reporters in Kano last week, he described ‘June 12’ as fiction and dismissed those still celebrating ‘the dead issue’ as idle.

    The fact that Tofa refuses to admit that something terrible happened on that day does not erase the reality or the place of those polls in Nigerian history. It also does not erase from the memory his role in the drama.

    Even worse, there are many like Tofa who are only too quick to move on to the next political blunder without analysing and learning from the past. The election is only free and fair where they are declared the winners.

    That is the tragedy of Nigeria and it makes the 20th anniversary of the annulment more poignant given the recent case of the Nigeria Governors Forum (NGF) election and the brazen attempt of losers to overturn an unpalatable outcome.

    This refusal to accept electoral outcomes is proof that the ghost of June 12 still roams the land. For as long as such despicable conduct continues, Tofa and all who participated in that chapter will continue to answers questions they would rather avoid. And that’s a fact!

     

  • Tofa predicts bad days ahead for PDP

    •Woos Kwankwaso, Amechi to Apc

    FORMER presidential candidate of the defunct National Republican Convention (NRC), Alhaji Bashir Tofa, yesterday appraised the developments in the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and concluded that the ruling party is heading for the rocks.

    Tofa, who spoke in Kano, said he had watched with keen interest the recent turbulence within the PDP and was not surprised.

    According to him, the party, which prides itself as the biggest in Africa, is fast becoming the smallest in the country. He said it was just a matter of time for the ruling party to explode.

    Tofa urged governors, including Rabiu Kwankwaso of Kano and Rotimi Amaechi of Rivers, to urgently pitch their tent with the All Progressive Congress (APC).

    He said: “We hereby extend our hands of friendship and invite them to save their political future by joining the APC before the merger is concluded, so they can be regarded as part and parcel of the new party and not as new comers.”

    Tofa said some governors are contemplating the move, urging them to be brave enough to act now in the best interest of the country and Nigeria’s young democracy, which he accused some people of trying to cripple.

    The former Contacts and Reconciliation Committee Chairman of the All Nigeria Peoples Party (ANPP) noted that Amaechi would not be the last of the governors and other principled leaders of the PDP to be suspended and later dismissed. He said he may also be arrested after leaving office.

    “Such people,” he said, “must take a principled decision and join the APC immediately. These include some senators and members of the House of Representatives and other party leaders who are jittery about the PDP but are hesitating to summon the courage to take a wise decision.

    “They must do so now and relieve themselves of the worry and the guilt.”