Tag: transition

  • Midlife crisis or midlife transition

    Continued from last week

    There are underlying mechanisms of the midlife crisis: physical, mental, spiritual, environmental, and social mechanisms.  To know them helps the mid-lifer to undergo mid-life transition rather than midlife-crisis.

    Spiritual:   Spiritual matters contributing to midlife crises are typically individualistic and may be above intellectual scrutiny therefore we will not attempt to analyze them too much here. It is important to know that having a good soul mate in marriage and/or suitable life companions, living according to one’s predestination which is often inscribed in our genetic makeup and talents, and having a proper relationship to one’s origin and end (widely understood as God) are important contributors to life fulfilment and satisfaction which are partially attained by midlife. Uneven yokes are risky and may become counterproductive. At midlife one may become aware of what has become one’s predominant contribution (good or evil) to one’s family, society, or the world: progress or backwardness, love or hate, mediocrity or greatness, order or chaos, justice or strife -temporary or permanent.  Positive outcomes of awareness of one’s contributions may be satisfaction, contentment, joy, peace, freedom, optimism, drive, momentum, etc.  Negative outcomes may be dissatisfaction, rebellion, unhappiness, viciousness, paralysis, pessimism, discouragement, despondency, etc. Crises are playgrounds of evil.  Transition is to gain spiritual power to overcome various evils.

    Environmental: A midlife entrepreneur in Nigeria at this point in early 2016 that has no personal solutions to problems of electricity, petroleum, and forex shortages experienced in the country may be bound for crisis.  Many parts of the world are hit by overpowering wars, floods, catastrophes, accidents, epidemics, etc. that devastate people’s lives instantly. No matter how matured and successful the mid-lifer was before such happenings, crisis is generally inevitable.  To see the gains of ones efforts in life destroyed suddenly and possibly irrecoverably is bad for one’s ego and emotions.  There can be lasting wounds: physical, mental, spiritual. People of power, influence, and affluence should be quick is assisting victims who suffer such disasters.  The quicker and the better the aid, the better the transition the victims can make.

    Societal: Some people at midlife find themselves with the double responsibilities of taking care of their children, especially costs of education, and taking care of their parents, especially cost of health care. Both can be financially draining, time consuming, and can limit one’s other interests or capabilities.  This can become a source of crisis.  On the other hand, the Empty Nest may be a source of midlife crises. The children have gone to live their own lives and single parents or couples are left alone in their homes. The initial adjustments may be difficult.  Mid-lifers may also grow tired of or sever longtime associates possibly through such factors as: change of occupation, review of religious beliefs, change of political affiliations, awareness of cultural identities, emergence of differential social statuses between oneself and one’s associates, limitation by illnesses, and relocation.   Loss of friendships, acquaintances, and relationshipsare telling in lack of social support when needed.  The wisdom of Ecclesiastes 4: 10 (NAB) puts it: “Woe to the solitary man!  For if he should fall, he has no one to lift him up.” Transition is to reposition oneself correctly in society and this may be in different aspects for different persons.

    Factors That Can Lead To Male Midlife Crisis

    Popular gossip says “men have huge egos”.  Has anyone been able to disprove it?  A man needs to feel that he is a man and if he does not feel so, there may be crisis. A crisis is expressed in active or passive behavior.   Actively, a man in midlife crisis would most likely do anything to make him feel bigger or better such as: having a new girlfriend that is twenty years younger or far more good-looking than his wife, marrying more wives that he has no time or money for; buying a new posh car that only creates a fleet in his yard; scrambling to the top of the professional ladder recklessly; embezzling a huge some; breaking laws with audacity; oppressing someone; doing outrageous things, etc.  Passively, one may escape from reality through drink, drugs, sex, abandonment of job or family, etc.

    Factors That Can Lead To Female Midlife Crisis

    A woman’s emotions are a treasure for her children and husband and when emotions are empty there may be crisis.  Celibate women who have lost the fervor of their celibacy may experience crisis due to unfulfilled emotions.  Single women may also be strongly disposed towards midlife crisis for lack of a spouse or children.  Widows, divorced women, and single mothers may also be strongly disposed to midlife emptiness.  The premenopausal, menopausal, and postmenopausal stages that women pass through may vary individually and may turn to crisis depending on whether the woman is celibate, single, a widow, or divorced and depending on whether she is a mother or childless.  Talking is a good outlet of one’s feelings but it can also bond one with the listener which may be good or bad, depending on the listener.  Emotional substitutions may be by anything including adopting a child, keeping any company including bad or unfit dates, attachment to groups and teams including faith groups, and using sex toys.

    Even though men may have huge egos and women may have huge emotions, the role of the ego or emotions in a crisis is individualistic and midlife crisis may have emotional or egoistic preponderance in either males or females alike.

    Dr. ‘Bola John is a biomedical scientist based in Nigeria and in the USA.   For any comments or questions on this column, please email bolajohnwritings@yahoo.com or call 08160944635

  • March to digital transition on course, says NBC chief

    March to digital transition on course, says NBC chief

    • Nigeria ‘to earn N320b’

    • ‘No spectrum sale to MTN’

    Nigeria’s march to achieving digital switch-over (DSO) is on course, the Director-General, National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), Emeka Mba, said yesterday, adding insecurity and expensive political activities made adequate funding to prosecute the programme impossible.

    Mba who spoke yesterday in Lagos also said when DSO is achieved it will fetch the Federal Government N320billion cash and create no fewer than 30,000 jobs.

    The DG who also denied selling spectrum to MTN, said the Commission’s regulatory function does not extend to the sale of spectrum. He said what the Commission did was merely to licence MTN to use part of the 700megahetz (MHz) frequency to do digital pay TV broadcasting services from which it sought and got the permission of former President Goodluck Jonathan and former Communications Technology Minister, Dr Omobola Johnson in her capacity as the chair of the National Frequency Management Council (NFMC).

    He said the Commission raised N34billion from the transaction, adding that the fund would be deployed to pursuing the achievement of the DSO.

    He said: “We have successfully licensed Nigeria Ltd to use a part of the 700 MHz to provide digital pay TV broadcasting services. We have thus raised N34 billion, slightly less than 50 per cent of our budget. Through this singular move, Nigeria has once again pointed the way for other African countries struggling with the effort of finding financing for their own digital switchover programmes.”

    He regretted that Nigeria missed the June 17 deadline set by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) for all its member-countries to switch off analogue transmission, lamenting that it was not until June 17, 2012 that the White Paper giving direction to the process came out.

    “Again, we continued doing those things we could which included engaging and sensitising the broadcast sector, setting out the technical specifications for the set top box and putting in place then Electronic Programme Guide system, in addition to a successful pilot project in Jos, Plateau State.  All this while, we were waiting for the financing of our budget of N70billion from government (which never came).

    “Meanwhile, we have now coordinated another agreement with our West African neighbours and have agreed on a new deadline of June 20, 2017 to complete the digital switchover and achieve analogue switch off.

    “When it became obvious that government could not spare the money, and in order to avoid missing another deadline, we began to consider other options. Our broadcast frequency, which is to eventually form part of the digital dividend after the DSO, had portions of it lying fallow while our broadcasters were still using parts of it.”

    Nigeria’s self-funding DSO programme will in the long term, create a N320 billion cash yearly, stressing that consumers also will receive over 30 new free to air channels per annum for the price of a N1500 set top box (STB). He said a host of other value added services such as news, information and video on demand.

    Mba said a leading digital economy is established from the development of a whole TV and content ecosystem, adding that N200 billion yearly boost from additional advertising, content and Nollywood income streams

    He added that the development of high tech STB manufacturing industry will create jobs while the Federal Government will earn N100 billion income from spectrum sales (digital dividend)

    “A thriving digital economy generating at least 55,000highly skilled jobs will be created too. I want to assure that with the current arrangement through which we have secured more than half of our budgetary needs to transit, and as we explore other avenues, we are confident that the new date is achievable,” Mba said.

  • Yero, El-Rufai pray for smooth transition

    Outgoing Kaduna State Governor Mukhtar Yero and Governor-elect Nasir El-Rufai at the weekend prayed together as part of activities for the May 29 inauguration of the incoming government.

    A statement in Kaduna by the governor-elect’s spokesperson Samuel Aruwan said other top government functionaries attended the prayer.

    The statement said the Jum’at (Friday) prayer at the 44 Comilla Barracks Mosque in Kaduna was organised by Kaduna State Government Transition Committee.

    El-Rufai said: “We are grateful to Almighty God for His kindness and benevolence. We pray for a successful transition in our state – for peace, development and harmony among our people.

    “We are appealing to all citizens of Kaduna State to join us in prayers and work together for progress. We pray Allah to bless our state and uphold us as we strive to provide purposeful leadership for our state.”

    Deputy Governor Nuhu Audu Bajoga and Deputy Governor-elect Bala Barnabas Bantex yesterday attended the ECWA Church at the Prisons Barracks in Kaduna for the Christian prayers.

    The Chairman of the state branch of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Bishop George Dodo, urged politicians to be God-fearing and focus on service delivery.

  • Transition: Jonathan halts signing of amendments to constitution into law

    Transition: Jonathan halts signing of amendments to constitution into law

    Following the discovery of an extraneous recommendation, President Goodluck Jonathan has halted the signing of amendments to the 1999 Constitution into law.

    The outgoing President decided to avert creating any  problem for President-elect  Muhammadu Buhari.

    According to sources, the National Assembly, after harmonisation, amended 71  sections and some Schedules to the 1999 Constitution.

    The amendments include Sections 4, 7, 9, 45, 50A and 90A, which enshrine in the Constitution the establishment of National Assembly and State Houses of Assembly Service Commissions. Other sections passed include 59, 65 and 106, 67, 81, 82 and 122, 84 (4) (A – F), 89 and 129, 121, 124, 134 and 179, 174 and 211, 225, 228, 241, 251 and 285.

    But Jonathan and his team disagreed with the clause seeking to empower the National Judicial Council (NJC) to recommend the candidate for Attorney General of the Federation to the President. They believe that by  allowing NJC to recommend the Attorney-General of the Federation will amount to abuse of the principle of separation of powers.

    A source, who spoke in confidence, said: “The President was almost signing the new  amendments into law until the extraneous recommendation was discovered. The power to appoint either the Minister of Justice or the Attorney-General of the Federation cannot be ceded to the NJC by the President.

    “Also, the government looked at the functions of the NJC and there is no power allowing the body to appoint the Attorney-General of the Federation.

    “So, it is like whittling down the Executive powers of the President for no justifiable reasons. Whatever is the intention of the lawmakers, it is illegal to ask the NJC to appoint the AGF.

    “The President may send this amendment back to the National Assembly to take a second look at it.”

    Another source said: “Signing the amendment empowering the NJC to appoint the AGF  will amount to creating a challenge for the President-elect. Though the amendments preceded the election of Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, the new government might not see it so.

    “The President does not want to create any constitutional obstacle or crisis for the incoming administration and decided to withhold his assent.”

    In withholding his assent, it was not immediately clear if the President was also wary of the public outrage over pension for life for the President and Deputy President of the Senate; the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives.

    One of the amended sections says: “Any person who has held office as President or Deputy President of the Senate, Speaker or  Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives shall be entitled to pension for life at a rate equivalent to the annual salary of the incumbent President or Deputy President of the Senate, Speaker or Deputy Speaker  of  the House of Representatives.”

    The Constitution (Fourth Alteration) Bill, 2014 was passed in the Senate and House of Representatives respectively on Tuesday 21st  and Wednesday 15th October, 2014.

    The National Assembly transmitted same on Tuesday 28th October, 2014 to the State Houses of Assembly to fulfill the requirement  of Section 9(2) of the 1999 Constitution.

    The 36 State Houses of Assembly have forwarded their resolutions on the provisions of the Bill.

    Having satisfied Section 9( 2) of the Constitution, the amendments were processed in line with the Acts Authentication Act and transmitted to the President and Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria for his assent.

  • No to transition

    No to transition

    •The calls to postpone polls and set up an interim committee lack democratic or patriotic merit

    With the elections around the corner, some Nigerians are articulating views intended to change the course of this democracy. They have either called for a transition committee, or expressed open doubts over the prospects of the polls next month.

    These views leap out of platforms of those known to be patriots, or statesmen or politicians with a measure of respectability. But their premise derives from the age-old tendencies that truncate the tide of our politics or frustrate our optimism as a people.

    This misguided fervour gained currency during the national conference convoked last year. Some of the participants called for the postponement of the elections, while others thought that it was wise to set up a transition body to oversee the nation’s move towards a stable political era.

    We disagree with this standpoint, and we also see it as influenced not only by opportunism cloaking as principle but also anti-democratic in its impulse. We cannot overthrow a democracy in the interest of democracy. It is a philosophical absurdity. We believe all those who espouse this tendency should stop forthwith, or else they would kindle the flame of subversion against the best system of popular persuasion known to humans.

    The fulcrum of their position is that we are not institutionally ready for the elections. Some have argued that The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) lack of readiness means we are not going to have satisfactory elections. Some others have adverted to the turbulence of the northeast where the ravages of the Islamic sect Boko Haram have cut through large swathes of Nigerian territory. Some others say that the period between the emergence of party nominees and the elections were brutally short, making campaign time insufficient for the people to assess their candidates and for the characters, programmes and philosophies of the candidates to trickle down the electorate.

    Others have latched on to a prediction by a United States think tank that Nigeria would not survive 2015.

    The implication of these views is clear. It would mean that the transition from the present corps of office holders to the new set would be abbreviated. Basically, they are calling for the suspension of the Nigerian grund norm, the 1999 constitution. They are calling for the extension of the rule of President Goodluck Jonathan. They are setting an indefinite date for the end of this political dispensation, or they are calling for the end of this political dispensation. In clear terms, they are calibrating a coup against the constitution and against the democratic order.  We also recall that the presidency of Goodluck Jonathan had toyed with the proposal of a one-term presidency for seven years, and it did not enjoy widespread support in the country. In fact, it came across as self-serving and opportunistic.

    In some detail, the “transitionists” have called for the appointment of some prominent Nigerians to head this transition, and have suggested a sinecure status for President Jonathan. His role, they say, would be merely a conciliatory role. He would by implication be coerced into the exalted pose of a statesman. In order words, Jonathan may not have to run for president after a transition that might even last as long as two years.

    This position comes across either as naïve or cynical, depending on who is espousing what. Some of the proponents are trying to craft a new platform of relevance for themselves in the new proposed state. Others are trying to choreograph revenge against those who have gained prominence in the present state of things. Or is it a back room implementation of the Jonathan seven-year agenda?

    There are some questions that bear being asked. Under what legal canopy are we going to operate the transition system? Who would be the enforcer? For, if that transition programme exceeds May 29, President Jonathan would not have any authority to govern as president. He would be a dictator by committee, and the constitution would have been overthrown.

    The only time we had such an arrangement was by fiat, and it was after the debacle of the 1993 June 12 election. The military installed the interim transition under the control of the army, and it turned out to be a failure. It ushered in one of the darkest tyrannies in human history under General Sani Abacha.

    They are calling, in a civilian era, for a transition regime that is based purely on trust. That is why we believe that it is either inspired by naivety or opportunistic cynicism. No democracy works on the trust of a few men. Yes, a few men enrich the system but they work without a sense of entitlement.  They thrive on rules. Even when the United States started their democratic experiment, their founding fathers operated under rules.

    The claim that the campaign time is short may be valid, but it calls for a more intense and creative campaign by the candidates. The INEC has shown a lot of incompetence over the issue of personal voter cards and it creates unease when it said it was not ready in event of a runoff in a presidential race.

    We are not going to deny that there are problems, and there is disquiet in some circles about the prospect of violence and subversion in the aftermath of the elections. Rather than focus on the doubts and negativity, those naysayers should turn their energies to emphasise suggestions on how we could turn these fears into hope, concerns into peace.

    The national conference that took place in 2014 was a long exercise in debates, perorations, circumlocutions vapours of rhetoric that resulted in a document now gradually gathering dust like its predecessors. The National Assembly has distanced itself from it because they saw it as a plot to overthrow them.

    The fear that the election of either President Jonathan or General Muhammadu Buhari would touch off violence derives from the activities  of two militant groups: the Boko Haram insurgents in the north and the Niger Delta militants. Are we to surrender because these groups would bring us to our knees? Is it not by engaging our democratic strengths that we can eventually vote in those who can provide answers? We have had committees, changed military commanders, declared state of emergencies but the Islamic militants are not about to surrender. Rather, they are waxing strong and making mincemeat of our soldiers.

    The Niger Delta militants are also doing havoc, in spite of the amnesty granted them. As the so-called “transitionists” suggest, a transition committee would provide a template to change the country. It would have been idealistic if it was not naïve or cynical. On what powers or laws are they going to operate? Who would approve their decisions and on what document would implementation take place?

    Democracy is a system of laws and not of men. If violence or sectarian prejudice sullies our political landscape, we have to be ready to confront them as a people within the ambit of law. We have no choice but to have faith in the democratic process. Any alternative will be either anarchy or tyranny. We want neither.

     

  • Time for Transition in Algeria

    Time for Transition in Algeria

    The landslide re-election of Algeria’s 77-year-old president, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, last Thursday to a fourth term comes as no surprise. Despite reports that many younger Algerian voters stayed home, as well as accusations from the political opposition of election fraud, the official tally gave Mr. Bouteflika an incredible 81.5 percent of the vote. Mr. Bouteflika is in such fragile health following a stroke last year that he did not participate in three weeks of campaigning, and he cast his vote from a wheelchair.

    It is past time for Algeria to move toward a more open society and a more diverse economy. Mr. Bouteflika and his government, led by a small group of army generals and intelligence officials, many of whom are also in their 70s, enjoy support among older Algerians who credit them with ending a civil war during the 1990s that claimed up to 200,000 lives. Still, there is discontent among Algerians under the age of 45, who make up four-fifths of the country’s 37 million people. Youth unemployment has steadily increased in recent years in Algeria’s overly oil-dependent economy, and riots and demonstrations have increased as well.

    For years, the Algerian government has managed to keep its grip on power and a lid on social upheaval by a combination of political repression and generous social handouts financed by the country’s oil wealth. A 2001 decree bans all demonstrations in Algiers, the capital, and the authorities are quick to crack down on public political gatherings elsewhere.

    Basic freedoms of association, peaceful assembly, collective bargaining and movement into and out of Algeria are severely restricted. According to Human Rights Watch, on the eve of the election, police detained and beat members of the new movement Barakat! (“Enough!” in Arabic), whose members opposed a fourth term, as they headed toward a peaceful protest at Algiers University.

    This strong-arm strategy cannot be sustained against a changing population. The decree banning demonstrations in Algiers should be repealed. Without legitimate means of dissent and the protection of basic rights, violent uprisings will only increase, threatening Algeria’s stability and that of the entire, already volatile, region.

    -New York Times

     

  • ‘His death a glorious transition’

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) has commiserated with Lagos State Governor Babatunde Fashola and his family on the loss of their patriarch, Pa Ademola Fashola.

    In a statement in Abuja yesterday by its National Chairman, Chief Bisi Akande, the party said although the death of a loved one, especially a worthy father like Pa Fashola, is painful even at a ripe age, his exit is nothing but a glorious transition.

    “A father, who gave the people of Lagos State a first-rated governor and a man of integrity and rare vision like His Excellency, Mr. Babatunde Fashola, must be appreciated and celebrated in life and death.

    “This is why we believe that the death of Pa Fashola, despite being painful, should be used as an opportunity to celebrate his life, not just by his family but by all of us,” it said.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • A National Arts Theatre in transition

    A National Arts Theatre in transition

    Stakeholders are suspicious of the new plan for the National Arts Theatre, Lagos. But, its management says an hotel and other facilities are being bulit in addition to the theatre.It, however, remains to be seen how this will transform the fortune of the monument, reports OZOLUA UHAKHEME

    Its opening 37 years ago was glorious. Its exterior is shaped like a military hat, perhaps because it was built by the military administration of the then Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo, with a 5000-seater main hall, with a collapsible stage and two 700-800 capacity cinema halls, equipped with facilities for simultaneous translation of eight languages.

    Neglect and poor management by successive governments turned the elegant edifice into a symbol of ruin and decadence. The air conditioning system failed long ago. The toilets are disgusting and the halls, some with wobbly seats, are almost permanently dark, no thanks to epileptic power supply. The lawns have seen better years.

    Welcome to the National Arts Theatre, Iganmu, Lagos, which, over the year, has sunk into dilapidation. In its heydays, it was the primary centre for the performing arts in the country.

    Despite a couple of interventions, the huge main bowl of the theatre is not what it was envisaged to be. Although ranked the largest in Africa, bigger than that of Durban and Cape Town in South Africa, the theatre has not been fully utilised since it was completed in 1976 in preparation for the Festival of Arts and Culture (FESTAC) in 1977.

    The first attempt to rewrite the story of the theatre was in 2001. The then President Obasanjo announced plans to privatise it. This sparked off controversy in the arts community. Notable voices, including Nobel Laureate Prof. Wole Soyinka were against the move. Actors and actresses staged a series of protests against the sell-off plans. There were arguments that buyers of the theatre would use it to enrich and not promote arts and culture.

    The plan was dumped. Now, it is resurfacing in another format. It all began when Edem Duke became the Minister of Culture and toured its facilities. During the tour, he was told by the theatre’s General Manager and CEO, Kabir Yusuf, that about N500 million would be needed to acquire a chiller for the humid main bowl, which was last used in 1994 for the screening of the late Hubert Ogunde’s famous film, Ayanmo.

    Perhaps sure that the Federal Government would not put such money into the edifice, the minster proposed that corporate Nigeria should step in to assist in restoring the glory of the theatre.

    Now, the plan is taking shape and it is trailed by controversy. On paper, the plan is to add a five-star hotel, a water restaurant and so on to the theatre. But some fear the whole edifice may be turned to an hotel, as reported yesterday by this paper.

    Yusuf yesterday said the Federal Government has no plan to turn the nation’s former number one event centre into a five-star hotel. He said, instead, government is implementing the business segment of the master-plan of the 37-year-old edifice.

    He said the National Arts Theatre would not be touched and would still remain and function as the nation’s foremost cultural and event venue.

    He said: “There is no issue of touching the National Theatre. What government is doing is to lease the landed properties surrounding the edifice to investors to develop. This is a way to save the theatre instead of outright sale. The facilities earmarked for the business phase of the complex, which is in tandem with the master-plan of the theatre include a five-star hotel, shopping mall, multi-level car park, land and water restaurants as well as offices.

    “Serious businessmen are showing strong interest in the land and we can’t leave it to miscreants. The current facilities on ground around the theatre cannot support the growth of the theatre. And we are sitting on gold.”

    Yusuf explained that on September 20, last year, the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and National Orientation inaugurated a committee comprising of representatives of the Ministry of Housing, the Infrastructure Regulation Commission and the Surveyor-General to examine the viability of the master-plan of the National Arts Theatre.

    According to him, the committee recommended that the master-plan is viable only under a Public Private Partnership (PPP) arrangement. This, he said, necessitated a memo to the Presidency for approval, which was granted.

    “Based on the approval, the management sought a consortium that will lead with an outline briefcase,” he noted, adding that next week the consortium would roll out its outline briefcase after which the various projects would be made public for investors to bid.

    He added: “All the preliminary works would be wrapped up in three months.”

    He stated that following the approval from the Presidency, the Minister of Tourism, Culture and National Orientation issued a quit notice to all parastatals and agencies under the ministry whose liaison offices and stations are within the affected land of the National Theatre. He said all the affected agencies, such as National Gallery of Art, National Council for Arts and Culture, have their headquarters in Abuja.

    “What they have here are stations that are built as temporary office accommodation. But the National Gallery of Art outlet within the theatre will not be affected because it will be useful to tourists to the theatre,” he added.

    Continuing, he said: “In the whole world, there is no country where a theatre stands alone, for example, that of Cairo in Egypt. There should be associated facilities around the theatre to complement its services. Unfortunately, the facilities around our theatre are nothing but shanties and they diminish the status of the theatre. The only facility we allowed is the Metro Station of the Lagos State government, which is approved by Federal Government.”

    The minster’s letter on the development reads: “The President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed

    Forces, Federal Republic of Nigeria, His Excellency, Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR, has approved the development of the National Theatre Land in accordance with the original Masterplan with infrastructures (sic) which include, but not limited to a Five-Star Hotel, Shopping Mall, Multi-Level Car Park, Land and Water Restaurant, offices.

    “Consequently, a Transaction Advisor was engaged, to, among others give Transaction Advisory Services for the application of Public-Private Partnership option for the delivery of the necessary services on the land. “Please recall that the inevitability of relocating your office was discussed at the

    meeting I had with you on this development on 5th of March, 2013 in Lagos .

    “To this effect, you are hereby advised to relocate your office within two (2) weeks to an alternative location as suggested at the meeting, so as to pave (sic) way for the development that is to be situated where your office is currently located.

    “Please note that this relocation is temporary as the structures that will eventually provide accommodation for your operations are being envisaged under the new arraignment.

    “As we solicit for your understanding and cooperation, we assure you that the efforts of the government in providing these infrastructural facilities as complementary to the National Theatre, as it is with other theatres in other parts of the world will be a thing of pride when completed. Please accept the assurances of my best regards.”

    On Monday, a source told The Nation: “They are talking of expansion under PPP arrangement, but we are suspecting that they want to convert the National Theatre Complex into a hotel. If their plan is to expand infrastructure in the complex, why will they ask vital agencies to relocate from the place within two weeks.

    “Nigerians should ask the Minister to tell them when the PPP arrangement was mooted, the recommendations of

    Infrastructure Concession and Regulatory Commission (ICRC), and how a transaction advisor was appointed.

    “As we are talking now, there are no records to show that the matter was tabled for approval by the Federal Executive Council.

    “Some people are just trying to create a crisis for the administration of Jonathan. We are suspecting foul play because an investor from the Niger Delta has been linked with the project.”

    Another source added: “Again, they are trying to shortchange the South-West which is already protesting against marginalisation. They are acting a script to do away with the National Arts Theatre, which was built by Obasanjo.

    “Even if Obasanjo is no longer a good man in their books, the national heritage he constructed should not be wasted.”

    On how the development of the landed property would impact on the theatre, Yusuf said: “Whatever will be realised from the lease would be ploughed into renovating the main bowl, which has a 6,500 sitting capacity. The repair of the main bowl, which is the biggest in Africa and Middle East will cost billions of naira.”

    There was, however, uneasy calm at the National Gallery of Art, the National Council for Arts and Culture, National Institute for Cultural Orientation, the Artists Village, Universal Studio of Artists (USA) and the popular Abe Igi (cluster of bars) as workers were seen reading The Nation and discussing the quit order.

    In a telephone interview, one of the affected CEOs described the two-month notice as unrealistic because government has not provided the affected agencies with any alternative office accommodation. “We are civil servants and Nigerians. For me, it is the most draconian of any law in recent time. We are in a democracy and am sure the National Assembly may be unaware of this development,” she said.

    The artists at the USA, who claimed they have not been served the notice, said they had paid for this year.

    A sculptor Fidelis Odogwu, said: “We hope the notice will not affect our studio because the management of the theatre has not discussed such with us. In fact, we pay our rent as tenant of the National Theatre. And we have paid for this year.”

    At the NGA and NCAC, the joint Art Craft and Décor Fair which opened on March 28 at the National Gallery of Crafts and Design, and Aina Onabolu Building is still running.

    It is believed that the demolition of the buildings will be carried out as soon as the preferred investors are chosen. Time will tell, however, if the theatre will be the better for the new deal.

  • Cities in transition at Art Dubai

    Cities in transition at Art Dubai

    Curator and Founder of Centre for Contemporary Art, Lagos, Bisi Silva will lead six other Nigerian artists to Marker 2013, a curated section of the yearly Art Dubai Fair, in United Arab Emirate (UAE) opening today. The art show, which will be curated by Bisi Silva will run till March 23. The six artists from Nigeria, which is the largest number of the four countries featuring in the show are mixed media artists Ndidi Dike and Taye Idahor, sound artist Emeka Ogboh, photographers Ade Adekola and Charles Okereke as well as designer Carol Akpokien.

    According to the organisers, the theme of Marker 2013 focuses on emerging big cities and the effect of urbanisation on the people’s tradition. It would be interesting to know how the artists interpret the issue of growing cities and preservation of heritage. But, Silva noted that every culture practitioner should be concerned about how heritage was being preserved.

    For Marker 2013 however, each artist, may not exactly be focusing on how or not a government’s policy affects preservation of heritage, but how engaging the contents of their work are. “This is an art exhibition, not a conference or seminar. The artists are therefore expressing their day-to-day experience, not exactly focusing on the policy of government,” Silva said.

    She explained that there exists a commonality among the artists, she added, which will be on “a common interest in how the cities affect the social and economic lives of the people. For example, one of the artists looks at architecture and how the new are submerging the old; sky- scrappers with no ventilation, whereas African community setting is largely communal. It’s interesting to probe how this, for example, impacts on us in the next 100 years.”

    Future editions of Marker may not have African spaces, but this year’s event offers a window for Nigerians and other African artists in general to look beyond their immediate environment. The idea is to go into new market, new experience, Silva said, adding, “I think most of them, if not all are showing in the Middle East for the first time. Having six artists working in different ways shows the diversity of practice in Nigeria.”

    Silva said in a report that Idahor and another young artist, Ekanem Konu would be at Marker 2013 to represent CCA at the curatorial level. “We want to develop art infrastructure, so that when artists come out of schools, they can be curators if they so choose to. I hope that in the next five to 10 years, there would be more curators, not just in Nigeria, but across Africa,” she added.

     

  • Digital Transition:  Does Nigeria need  the changeover?

    Digital Transition: Does Nigeria need the changeover?

    As deadline for the complete switchover from analogue to digital broadcasting by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) draws nearer, experts gathered in Lagos to evaluate issues surrounding this project of international concern, and its possible effects on Nigerians. VICTOR AKANDE, who was a delegate at the two-day conference, reports

     

    FROM far and near, top shots in the ITC sector, broadcast industry, regulatory agencies and the media converged at the Southern Sun Hotel, Ikoyi, Lagos, for a conference that could be described as the first open dialogue in Nigeria on the much talked about transition from analogue to digital broadcasting, come June 17, 2015.

    No doubt, there appeared to be an uneasy silence on the side of government and the regulatory agencies as to how prepared Nigeria is to embrace the change. Less than three years to go, the average man on the street is not aware that very soon, his television set will no longer be valid as it is today. Not many parents are probably aware that for their present TV sets to be compliant with digital television signals, they will need to acquire a decoder called the Set Top Box. How the Set Top Box looks like, not many people know. How much it will cost them also remains a question that no one could answer, because the white paper from government on whether it will be imported or produced locally is a subject of speculation. But perhaps more importantly is the question of whether Nigerians have a choice of being fed with analogue signals, considering the sacrifices required to transit to digital.

    Spanning December 5th-6th, 2012, the conference, tagged Digital Dialogue Nigeria, took a cue from a recent one organised by Multichoice Africa for African journalists in Johannesburg, South Africa. The convener of the Lagos conference, Mr. Jenkins Alumona, a digital communication expert and honcho of Strategic Outcomes Ltd, ensured a broad-based participation that hopes to reenergise the pursuit of the digital broadcast objectives by opinion leaders, decision makers and the media.

    Answering prevailing questions, clearing doubts and proffering solutions on the possibility of a smooth transition for Nigeria, Alumona brought in the Director General of National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), Engineer Yomi Bolarinwa, a professor of communications at the Pan-African University, Mr. Emevwo Biakolo, Special Adviser to President Goodluck Jonathan on Media Matters, Mr. Bolaji Adebiyi, a consultant of the ITU on broadcast engineering, Engr. Edward Idris Amana, notable filmmaker and screen writer, Amaka Igwe, and foremost entertainment industry lawyer, Efere Ozako,were also there to jaw jaw on the issues. Facilitators who came from the foreign scene to share experiences of the models in other countries where digital transmission is already being test-run included the chairman of Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) Technical Module, Dr. Nick Wells; Gerhard Petrick, Manager, Research and Development at Multichoice Technical Operations in South Africa, Aynon Doyle, a notable strategist in digital communication technology and South African communication technology journalist, Aki Anastasiou, who was co-moderator of the forum, alongside popular actor and comedian, Okechukwu Onyegbule, otherwise called Okey Bakassi.

    Engineer Bolarinwa provided a background to Nigeria’s involvement in the decision at the ITU conference held in Geneva, in June 2006 where a switchover date of June 17, 2015 was agreed. This dispelled insinuations that the proposed date could have been an imposition from the western world.

    Bolarinwa, who declared the workshop open, expressed the seriousness of his Commission on the project, noting that Nigeria had opted for DVB-T2 technology, being the highest grade of the decoder during the Geneva conference. He said it was not true that the NBC has not been active on the transition; rather the white paper, which is meant to provide leeway on the recommendations of the Presidential Advisory Committee since 2008, has not been forthcoming from government.

    He said in the last eight years, NBC has single-handedly driven the process without the support or input from the broadcasters.

    The DG said it was necessary for Nigeria, not only to embrace the digital platform, but to also strive to do it well.

    Bolarinwa noted that public awareness on the issue is low, and urged government to take into consideration the problem of waste disposal that may arise from phasing out of some electronic gadgets in the course of transition, stressing that the most difficult waste to dispose is the electronic waste.

    But Alumona is optimistic that Nigeria will migrate on the set date, if work is started immediately. Nigerians, he noted, deserve to know what the government is doing in the direction of transition. He said there is danger in the people not knowing what is happening and that the repercussions of an unannounced blackout can be devastating.

    The Strategic Outcomes Ltd boss advised that the stakeholders, rather than wait for government to release the controversial white paper, should take proactive steps that could save the nation possible embarrassment that may arise from its inability to meet set deadline.

    Defending government’s disposition to the process, the Special Adviser to President Goodluck Jonathan on Media Matters warned against obvious cynicism and criticisms of government policies. He argued that the present administration was doing all within its means to ensure that the switchover is made possible by 2015.

    Professor Emevwo Biakolo challenged the media in his lead paper titled “The role of the mass media in attaining digital migration 2015.” He said security outfits, including “The Nigeria Police Force, State Security Services (SSS), The Nigerian Army, The Nigerian Navy, The Nigerian Air Force, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Intelligence Agency and Nigerian Maritime Administration & Safety Agency,” would be affected as the switchover would convert the entire broadcast network by switching the terrestrial platform from analogue to digital, just as high power transmissions may lead to interference from or by neighbouring countries.

    In his paper titled “Technical Imperatives of Digital Migration in

    Nigeria,” Amana, former executive director of engineering with Nigeria

    Television Authority (NTA) was optimistic that Nigeria would meet the deadline. Amana who was on the Nigeria’s delegation to the ITU conference in Geneva noted that even though the white paper is yet to be released, it merely provided the implementation framework for the digital transition. He said an event like the digital dialogue conference is capable of prompting government to act fast on the project.

    Amana urged the government to provide incentives for companies that will be involved in local contents production to drive the digital transition process, adding that capacity building on new engineering knowledge for digital broadcasting is critical.

    He suggested that transmission should be done in phases, because government would need to choose possible switch off method, whether phased shut off, nationwide shut off or partial shutdown. Amana recommended that for effective changeover, government must set up an implementation committee with clear terms of reference to enable Nigeria meet the deadline.

    In her presentation, Amaka Igwe stressed the need for major investment in content. She noted that the spectrum provided through digital broadcasting will provide enormous hours of programming, which content would be required to fill.

    Speaking on the theme: “Dynamics of Content Development in a Digital Broadcast Environment”, Igwe noted that only two choices exist for broadcast organisations on digitisation: be a carrier or be carried, or remain a content provider. She is optimistic about the competitive advantage which the transition will provide, saying that those who lacked creativity and dynamism may fizzle out, while advertising style will get dynamic.

    Legal icon, Efere Ozako, who took his turn, looking at “creating a framework for digital migration in Nigeria,” said there had to be a change in laws, determination of standards, development of policies and aggregation of what needs to be done with steps to effect them and follow up to ensure that time lines are met. He said failure to migrate may take the country back to the dark ages.

    Ozako said we need to develop policies on e-waste, switch-on and switch-off periods, frequency issues, as well as rates for signal carriers. He urged government to ensure that by December 31, 2014, laws, regulations and polices are in place; content licensees and signal distributors have been appointed, necessary infrastructure has been manufactured, procured and installed by all licensees, modalities for the manufacture and/or procurement of set top boxes have been settled, and that all technical or regulatory hitches and other teething problems have been addressed.

    Talking about “DVB-T2 around the world”, Dr. Nick Wells described Nigeria as being foresighted for opting for DVB-T2, being the latest technology. He said the technology is the best for digital television broadcasting, saying it could typically deliver 50 per cent more data than DVB-T.

    The scenario, on June 17, 2015 can be imagined, if transition is not done with all the awareness that is required. Picture quality on television will get blurred. Signals will be lost. Electronic repairers will feed fat on TV owners, thinking their gadgets are faulty. Set Top Boxes will experience panic buying. Artificial scarcity may follow. Most likely too, the security network in the country will be compromised if Nigeria fails to meet the deadline.

    Perhaps then, the reality of the situation will find solace in talk shows on radio, editorials in newspapers and debate in the social media. This is the scenario which the conference sought to prevent. All the delegates appeared to agree that awareness must start immediately, whether or not government releases the white paper. The possibility, as usual, could be that government, unfortunately, is working silently towards the big date.