Tag: trouble

  • VCs in trouble for taking N5.7m furniture allowance

    VCs in trouble for taking N5.7m furniture allowance

    EFCC launches probe

    Vice-Chancellors of some Federal universities collected over N480, 000 as furniture allowance monthly, National Universities Commission (NUC) chief  Abubakar Rasheed has said.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is probing financial irregularities levelled against some of the Vice Chancellors and Bursars of federal universities.

    Prof. Rasheed broke the news at a workshop on economic recovery and growth for bursars of Federal universities yesterday in Abuja.

    He accused some of the VCs of financial irregularities, flouting financial regulations and non-compliance with university regulations, especially extant federal circulars emanating from government agencies.

    Rasheed spoke of a large disparity in the university system’s salary scale. He alleged that some VCs were living big in terms of salary and allowances, adding that some receive above a million while others receive less.

    According to him, many universities allow their VCs to collect about N480,000 furniture allowance and N90,000 Duty Tour Allowance when top civil servants in the Education ministry collect about N20,000 as Duty Tour Allowance.

    Acting EFCC Chairman Ibrahim Magu has fixed a meeting with bursars and the VCs who are under the agency’s investigation for this week.

    Rasheed said: “There are many areas where you have to put your heads together. We have a lot of problems and you know them. If we may ask you as bursars in federal universities, what salaries do you pay your Vice-Chancellors? You will see that there may be as many salaries as there are many universities here. And this is one of the sources of crises.

    ”If all the 40 federal universities pay one single salary to all the VCs, that problem will have been resolved. This is why many of the university people are being taken to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

    ”The EFCC Chairman, Ibrahim Magu, is coming to my office this week to pay a courtesy visit. He wants me to even arrange a meeting with the VCs and bursars. The EFCC is investigating so many universities as you are aware. One of the areas being investigated by the EFCC is the Furniture Allowance.

    ”Many universities fail to interpret what we mean by the Furniture Allowance. Common sense tells us that the government will never allocate N5.77m as furniture allowance to the VC. Yet many bursars in many universities allow vice chancellors to take N480, 000 monthly as furniture allowance and you know it is wrong.

    ”This is why whenever the EFCC comes, there is crisis, and the VCs and the bursars are the easy targets. This interaction is to address these issues.”

    The NUC boss also said the federal government would not grant full autonomy to public universities.

    He explained that in view of the fact that public universities rely on government subventions to operate, granting them autonomy would be tantamount to throwing away its regulatory rights, especially checking financial excesses in the institutions.

    This position may pitch the NUC against the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU), which has always included right to full autonomy in demands put before government over the years.

    The NUC Executive Secretary accused most universities management of not being proactive in sourcing for funds locally, adding that: “rather they wait on government for grants, yet claim that they can regulate themselves”.

    ”There is no way government can totally grant autonomy to universities when all their funding comes from government source. Most of the universities can hardly generate enough funds for themselves, so you don’t expect government to give you money and don’t have a say on how such monies would be used,” Rasheed said.

     

  • Why the country is in trouble

    SIR: It is unfortunate that the corrupt politicians are not ready to change. They have instead decided to fight back using the media and all apparatus available to them. Imagine the Speaker, House of Representative and Senate President talking about building a system that will endure in fighting corruption and none of them suggested how the system will work and be built.

    How do you build a system where you find the House of Representatives doing everything possible to demolish already built institutions?

    Are they not the ones fighting to whittle down the powers of Code of Conduct Bureau? Are these not the same people fighting very hard to ensure that EFCC does not work?

    You say that the fight against corruption is selective; now tell me, which amongst those that have  been charged for corruption have come out to say that they have not committed the offence ? It takes a thief to support a thief.

    See, all they want is a system that will solidify their corruption.

    They want an institution that will help them to continue to pad the budget. They want a system where they will carry out evil without anyone to check them.

    Are they not supposed to be part of the body that will build the system? But what are they doing?  Doing what they know how to do best with the judiciary and winning their cases. One day, I assure that one day, we shall all reap the consequences of our actions.

    How can you cure a disease without fighting the disease and the cause? You need to fight corruption and the corrupt people to serve as deterrent. Tell me how much effect plea bargaining has had on our system; it did nothing but promote corruption to a wicked level.

     

    • Adeleke .O. Oluwaseun,

    Lagos.

  • CBN’s stress test shows three banks in trouble

    CBN’s stress test shows three banks in trouble

    • Oil/Gas constitutes 29.59% sector loan

    The Capital Adequacy Ratios (CARs) of three big banks have fallen below regulatory capital requirement, the result of stress test conducted by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) on the status of the banking system has shown.

    Overall, the result of the solvency stress test indicated the potential for high contagion   risk   through   unsecured   interbank   exposure   as   three banks including two Systemically Important Banks failed CAR after a 100 per cent default shock.

    The test, contained in the Financial Stability Report, released yesterday by the CBN governor, Godwin Emefiele, classified lenders into three groups: large banks, those with assets greater than or equal to N1 trillion; medium banks with assets greater than or equal to N500 billion but less than N1 trillion and small banks with assets of less than N500 billion.

    The CAR is a ratio of bank’s assets to its risks and is 10 per cent for national banks and 15 per cent for banks with international subsidiaries and 16 per cent for Systematically Important Banks (SIBs). It said the baseline CAR for the banking industry, large, medium, and small banks stood at 14.78, 15.47, 12.75 and 3.14 per cent, respectively.

    The  banking  industry stress  test was  carried  out  at  end-December  last year, covering  23 commercial  and merchant  banks, and   evaluated  the  resilience  of  the  banks  to credit,  liquidity, interest  rate and  contagion  risks.

    The tests, which measured the lenders’ positions as at December last year, were conducted using the  Implied  Cash  Flow  Analysis  (ICFA)  and Maturity  Mismatch/Rollover  Risk methods, to  assess  the  resilience  of  individual  banks  and the banking industry to both liquidity and funding shocks.

    It revealed that after a one-day run, the liquidity ratio for the industry would decline to 30.2 per cent from the 44.4 per cent pre -shock position and, to 9.73 per cent and 6.76 per cent after  a five-day  and cumulative  30-day  run,  respectively.

    Similarly,  a five-day  and  cumulative 30-day  run  on  the  banking  industry  would  result  in  liquidity  shortfalls of N2.1 trillion  and N2.3 trillion, respectively.

    The test showed that commercial banks experienced deterioration in assets quality  at end-December 2016. The ratio of non-performing loans (NPLs) to gross loans deteriorated by 2.3 and 8.7 percentage points to 14 per cent   compared with the levels at end-June 2016 and end-December 2015, respectively.

    The deterioration in asset quality, the report said, was largely attributed to the rising inflationary trend, negative Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth, and the depreciation of the naira.

    The CBN said economic crisis adversely impacted borrowers, resulting  in rising NPLs which  required  additional provisioning by  banks , thereby reducing the banks’ CAR.

    It said the decline  of  the  CAR  of small  and  medium  banks  did  not  weigh  significantly  on  the  industry CAR  because  large  banks  hold a  significant  proportion  (88.02 per cent)  of  total  banking  industry loans.

    Analysis of banking industry total credit by sector showed that, oil and gas sector constituted 29.59 per cent of total banking  industry  credit, while manufacturing,  general commerce, government and others, constituted 13.41, 8.71, 6.25, 8.34 and 33.70 per cent, respectively within the test period.

  • Senator in trouble over N4b contracts, 20 bank accounts

    Senator in trouble over N4b contracts, 20 bank accounts

    EFCC probes lawmaker’s assets missing on Code of Conduct Bureau form

    A senator is the subject of a massive probe for not executing N4 billion contracts awarded by the government of Delta State, The Nation learnt yesterday.

    Sources told The Nation yesterday that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) was also looking into how the lawmaker operates 20 accounts in six banks with different signatories.

    Besides, the senator allegedly used a company, to buy a 12-storey building in Apapa, Lagos, belonging to the Delta State Government for N805 million.

    The Nation learnt that the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) record showed that the senator  “did not declare all the companies and bank accounts he has despite being operational prior to the time he made the declaration”.

    The senator’s investigation, a source said, followed a petition from  Delta State.

    The petitioner alleged that the senator owns a firm which was awarded a N1,580,000,000 contract by the Direct Labour Agency to supply construction equipment.

    Instead of following specifications, the petition said, the senator allegedly supplied used equipment, contrary to the Bill of Quantity which specified new ones.

    Besides,  his firm was alleged to have  secured  over N2 billion contracts from nine local government areas in Delta worth over N2billion when it was yet to be registered under the Company and Allied Matters Act.

    The firm was alleged to have  secured N474, 936,000 contract from the Waste Management Board  to supply bulldozers, payloaders and tipper lorries.

    The, EFCC, however, found out that the equipment were used items contrary to contract specifications.

    A source in the anti-graft commission said: “We have traced five companies to the senator.  We were able to detect that in the course of contract execution, his company  imported and supplied used equipment, contrary to the specifications in the bill of quantity.

    “Our team has discovered that the senator’s personal and companies’ bank accounts were linked to a bank verification number (BVN) which has more than 20 accounts domiciled in six banks.

    “But his relative is the sole signatory to the accounts.

    “They also located  one foreign account identified with the senator in HSBC Bank in Marbile Arch London, United Kingdom”.

    Responding to a question, the EFCC source added: “So far, the senator has questions to respond to bordering on false asset declaration, official corruption, procurement fraud, tax avoidance, false information, impersonation and embezzlement of public funds.

    “We are almost concluding the investigation of the senator. We will soon invite him for interview.”

     

  • Trouble in community over removal of monarch

    There is tension in Ido, Ido Local Government Area of Oyo State, following the removal of the Onido and  appointment of Baale of Ido (a lesser chief) by the Olubadan-In-Council.

    There are two traditional rulers- the Baale, Alhaji Muritala Babalola and  the Onido, Chief Tajudeen Adelani Akinola Agura.

    Since Agura’s removal, youths have insisted on his restoration.

    Some elders have kicked against the title of Baale.

    The group loyal to Babalola is said to be warming up to check any attack from the opposing side.

    A resident, Pa Ramoni Gbadamosi, said: “We hope a sense of reason will prevail at the end. This is the third time they will remove traditional ruler in this town within 14 years.

    “It is surprising that they have now decided to tamper with history, when they decided to remove the age-long title of the Onido of Ido.

    “All that is paramount to us now is peace because we don’t know what will happen when we have two kings in a small town like this.”

    Agura in a letter by his lawyer, Dare Adebayo, described the appointment of Baale of Ido as illegal, null and void.

    He argued that the title of Baale of Ido is alien to the declaration under Section 4(2) of the Chiefs Law 1952 of the Customary Law regulating the selection to the Onido of Ido chieftaincy.

    In the three-page protest letter addressed to Governor Abiola Ajimobi, the petitioner said the title of Onido of Ido was recognised in Part II of the chieftaincy Law of Oyo State directly under the governor.

    He added that Babalola is not a member of Agura family as laid down by the Declaration under Section 4(2) of the Chiefs Law 1957, noting he was never nominated at Agura family meeting.

  • Trouble with 48-hour cargo clearance

    Trouble with 48-hour cargo clearance

    Importers and agents are facing difficulties clearing goods at the ports. In this interview with Maritime Correspondent OLUWAKEMI DAUDA, Association of Nigerian Licensed Customs Agents (ANLCA) President Olayiwola Shittu blames it all on security agencies.

    With the economic recession, what is the situation at the ports?

    The recession is affecting everybody. Importation has reduced and what is happening in the port now is what I will call the perfection of the ‘blame game’.  That is what is going on in the ports. The leadership of the security agencies is always playing the ostrich. They see no evil, hear no evil and know no evil. That is why I said what is happening now is the blame game.

    Can you please expatiate on that?

    When an agent is intimidated and frustrated to the level of parting with something in order to get out of the systemic web, and the headship turns round and says the agent is not ‘compliant’ and that the officer would not have been corrupted if not because of the corrupter, which is the agent, you can only imagine the experience.

    I believe that to whom much is given, much is expected. The Federal Government posted these people to the ports for the purpose of revenue generation and prevention of revenue leakages. That is why today in the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), there is  the enforcement arm and the revenue arm.

    But, they are all the same now. They are all both preventing revenue leakages as well  as ‘generating’ revenue now. Sadly, however, most of the people in the port are more interested in generating the revenue into their pockets, than generating the revenue for the government. Things have gone so bad. It is now worse to the extent that the Nigerian police have taken over the functions of the NCS.

    In what ways?

    When the Customs releases cargoes, the police still turn round, to take the containers to their places, and in one way or the other, ‘uncustoms’ items are found inside. I also think that it is the responsibility of the security agencies and by this, I mean the Customs, police, all of them in the ports, including those who are at present clamouring to be here, and that includes the NESRA, so as to protect the nation’s environment from the dumping of e-waste; the Quarantine, which wants to be in the ports to prevent the smuggling of woods out of Nigeria; as well as the pallets with which you package your imported cargo was not treated abroad before being used to bring in your goods.  Everybody has ‘valid’ varying excuses for wanting to be in the ports, yet the infractions continue.

    How do we stop the infractions?

    The truth is that nobody is genuinely thinking of stopping those infractions over there. It is in their best interest that the infractions are not prevented. Sometimes, it may even seem as if those infractions are deliberately encouraged to happen. But the lies they are selling to the government and the public is that it’s the agent that is corrupting. That was why I started by describing the situation on ground as the blame game.

    But why would an agent want to bribe a Customs officer?

    Maybe not because there is no amount of declaration you do in the port that would satisfy the expectation of the average officer. When the Customs came up with the Pre-Arrival Assessment Report (PAAR), it was supposed to be the final document. Now, if I buy an item from abroad, and my declaration is that it is $5, on the submission of that document, the bank is supposed to do its verification from their side and confirm the cost of the item. However, by the time they receive it in PAAR office, they are also supposed to do their own due diligence and if they confirm it is $5; they should issue a PAAR as a good facilitator of trade. The importer should, thereafter, simply pay his duty and carry his cargo and go. But that is not the situation because some people would now start querying the file, beginning with the value. And once you are stopped, there and you are able to succumb to the subtle extortion, the news would go down the line that there is chop on this cargo. And thereafter, the new value could become $7, a debit note (DN) would be raised and before you know it, the agent is already being made to look like a mediocre and frustrated.

    Does that make every Customs unit fall to extortion?

    The Valuation Officer may not be happy, but he knows he cannot afford to stand his ground and be accused of working against the overall goal of boosting revenue; and so he jacks it up to $7. Now, after doing that, on your way with your cargo, the Customs Intelligence Unit (CIU) would now intercept it, saying: ‘you must have done something with the value, because this is supposed to be $9’. Now, while these are all going on, you are not moving anywhere. You are stuck. Your demurrages are mounting. And at the end of the day, even if you were the one begging the importer, he would by now be upset with you as an agent. A frustrated importer would bring more money and ask you to pay; so you pay. Yet, for even daring to stand your ground against the officers, you have, without knowing it, committed an abomination. You have frustrated some gentlemen  and you must pay for it. So, when you get to the gate your penalty is to be tasked again to come for the  re-examination of what they have earlier examined at the terminal. Never mind the fact that the representatives of the gate were all fully there at the terminal when the goods were earlier thoroughly examined.

    Are you insinuating that the new process is frustrating?

    Yes. That is exactly what the average agent faces at the port.

    When Col. Hameed Ali (rtd) first came in as the Comptroller-General of Customs, there was hope that he would sanitise the ports. What is the situation now?

    You are wrong. Some of us were skeptical from the onset, because Ali was never within the system. It would take an average of three years for a non-Customs officer of a particular rank, to understand the rudiments of what is going on in the ports. So, what do you expect from Ali, a retired soldier and at his age, to start learning what classification is all about because it is not by book? It is by practical experience. What Ali was supposed to be is a symbol representing what we know the President for. It is not that there is no corruption in America or Britain or elsewhere for that matter. Even in China and Japan and South Korea where they kill people for stealing, people still steal. But the maxim is: don’t be caught. But why must my people suffer because they are not ready to compromise? You want to be patriotic, you want to pay your correct duty and if you make noise too much, they will come after you.

    What do you think Customs brokers elsewhere are doing better than their Nigeria counterparts?

    Several things. It is only in Nigeria that the Customs doesn’t treat Customs Brokers as very important. For instance, the entire African Customs Brokers representatives at the World Customs Organisation (WCO), except Nigeria, were all sponsored by the Customs Service of their various countries. We, from Nigeria, travelled to the summit with our money. Participants from Angola, Liberia, Mozambique, Jamaica were all sponsored because they appreciate them there as revenue generators. The proliferations of associations you see now were engineered by Customs officers because they did not want a united, strong, single agents’ body. And that’s why we have come with different names so that if one group says this, the other group will counter it. At the WCO in China, we were told that Nigeria has become the Regional Head of Customs Brokers in West Africa. And this is not unconnected with our modest contributions to the cause of Customs growth and recognition. But at home, we may not be genuinely recognised, let alone appreciated. Some people even see us as mere freight forwarders.

    Is there any difference between freight forwarders and Customs brokers?

    Yes. The difference between a Customs Broker and a freight forwarder is very great. The demarcation is not made here in Nigeria, because everybody wants to gain access to the port- so that they can make money. FIATA is the headship of freight forwarders all over the world. They are a member of the PSG ( Policy and Strategic Group) of the WCO. But who is the Chairperson of the PSG? The DHL. And what does their chairperson focus on? That shows the relevance of the Customs Brokers.

    The Federal Operations Unit of the Customs is known to always intercept cargoes on the highway on allegations that the importers didn’t pay the correct duty. What is your reaction to this sir?

    Those are the challenges we expect the Comptroller-General to help us surmount. We strongly believe he can still do it. And such a gesture can dramatically uplift the cargo facilitation job in Nigeria. It would end the growing wave of accusations that agents and Customs officers are sharing money. If the importer already knows how much he is supposed to pay; won’t he just pay it, collect his goods and walk away? But why is it that such very simple thing cannot be done? Or do we need to first report to the WCO through our own international federation of the Customs brokers that the Nigeria Customs is creating such and such man-made challenges for us? Must we first appeal to WCO to help us beg the NCS to assist us do the job better? For us, we feel we should not be exposing our ineptitude; we feel we should not expose ourselves. That is why we seek dialogue.

    Have you met with customs chief over the issue?

    As I am speaking with you, I am bold to say that three letters have been written by our association to the Comptroller-General (Col. Ali), soliciting for dialogue between the Customs agents and the CGC.  Only one was replied.  All what they are telling us is that the man is busy and I have not seen any interview he granted any major newspaper since he was appointed.

     

  • Ikorodu, 3SC game abandoned due to crowd trouble

    The Nigeria Professional Football League (NPFL) MatchDay 29 match between Ikorodu United and 3SC held at the Onikan Stadium yesterday was abandoned in the 89th minute following  trouble caused by fans.

    The irate fans suspected to be supporting the home team began to throw objects on the pitch and at match officials after Shooting Stars striker, Ajani Ibrahim equalised for the away team in the 89th minute of the game.

    Chinedu Onyekwu had given the Oga Boys the lead on the 25th minute  and the home fans were hoping to get their first win in the second round before Ibrahim dented their hope of survival in the elite division.

    The equaliser was however a bitter pill for the fans to swallow as they accused the centre referee and his assistants of bias officiating, denying them penalty calls.

    The home fans then started throwing stones and other dangerous objects onto the pitch, while they also attacked the supposed supporters of the away team who also retaliated in their own might.

    The referee then ordered the players off the pitch and into the dressing rooms for 30 minutes before ultimately deciding to call off the game after speaking with representatives from both clubs.

    Followers of the Nigerian league however blamed the match commissioner for allowing the game to go ahead without the availability of 50 policemen as stipulated by the rules and regulations governing the Nigeria league.

  • The trouble with Northern CAN

    It seems to be that the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) in this dispensation, has arrogated to its northern chapter, a role of ignominy hitherto, played by others during the Jonathan administration.  It’s common knowledge that this organization, with a leadership that sometimes is not in talking terms with God is set to go on collision course with Nigerians.  Nearly all Nigerians support President Buhari’s war on corruption so Nigerians are serious about uprooting corruption in their nation.

    Recall that in the Vanguard online news of April 26, Northern CAN said Nigeria will slide into confusion if Jonathan was arrested.  Of course, Nigerians who are waiting for all those who looted their treasury to be brought to account were shocked that an organization that is affiliated to God, could utter such unrighteousness.  Why would they embark on such an unholy advocacy?  Should men and women not reap what they sow?  Isn’t that what the Bible prescribes?

    If Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd), Chief Oliseh Metuh, Alex Badeh Akpobolokemi, etc., etc., are facing investigations and are being charged to court, why would Nigerians be confused if anyone, no matter how highly placed, suspected to have stolen public funds, is pulled in, if found culpable?  It leaves one with a clear pointer as to who is behind the continued misguided utterances of men who speak from the pockets of their sponsors and not through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

    It has further become clear that as the National CAN in the past, looked away from the stealing that went on under a supposedly Christian President, the Northern CAN, is now being used to castigate every action of the government of President Buhari.  Their meddlesomeness is becoming irritating.  They want to dictate who get appointed, and who should not be arrested if found culpable.  One wonders, what sort of people do we have in this association?

    I know President Buhari is not averse to criticisms, so a body such as CAN has a role to play in being the conscience of not just the Christians it represents, but also other Nigerians of good faith.  However, in playing that role, CAN should have all its facts so its criticisms can be constructive, sound, fair, just and believable.  The role some CAN members are playing now, am afraid, appears to be part of the work of the “National Association of Corruption Fighting Back.”

    The change mantra is being taken seriously by the President.  Consequently, he has adhered to the provisions of the constitution with regards to federal character.  Nowhere in our constitution is it stated that religion must be a criterion for appointing people to positions.  However, the following Northern Christians, excluding the inherited ones, were appointed by the government of President Buhari.

    Secretary to the Government of the Federation,Engineer Babachir David Lawal; Hon. Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development,Chief Audu Ogbe; Hon. Minister of Youths and Sports,Comrade Solomon Dalung; late Hon. Minister of State, Labour & Productivity, Barrister James Ocholi; Senior Special Assistant to the President onPolitical Matters, Hon. Gideon Sammani; Special Assistant to the President on Political Matters,Ayuba Birma; Special Assistant to the President on Social Events,Ayuba Balami; Personal Assistant to the President on Social Events,Mrs. Faith Pukuma; Senior Special Assistant to the President,Legal and Documentation, Prof. Adamu Usman; Administrator of Villa Chapel, Reverend Isaac Ambi; Executive Secretary, Nigeria Christian PilgrimsCommission, Pastor Tor Uja and Managing Director, Nigeria Inland WaterwaysAuthority, Boss Mustapha.

    Not many southern Nigerians can work out the religion or tribes of most northerners as many names are common to both Christians and Moslems in the north, the same way many northerners assume that Okon Bassey and Pere Tamuno are Igbo men.  It therefore, behoves Northern CAN to assume the role of educating southerners with facts, with a view to allaying their anxiety occasioned by perceived marginalization.

    For every appointment made, there are probably a million others who are qualified too.  But only one can be appointed.  It’s therefore sad that if an appointee is a Christian who is not known to Northern CAN, his or her Christianity becomes a nullity and of no effect.  Could this be the fate of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation and other Christian appointees?

    It’s obvious that the aim of all these misinformation is to divide a region perceived as President Buhari’s stronghold.  The role of an association such as CAN is not that of dividing the north along religious lines.  It should be that of uniting the whole country so Nigerians can collectively focus on building a strong nation where people experience equal opportunities irrespective of tribe, religion, etc.

    Again, one does not need a religion to do a good job.  All religions of the world encourage merit.  There are those who may not subscribe to any religion but can do a great job.  Should it not be of paramount concern to the Northern CAN that people who can do the job be appointed?  Should they not be holding to account those who are failing in their duties?  Should they not be solidly standing behind the righteous work of this government in fighting the capital sin of corruption?

    The CAN in Nigeria in the immediate past became controversial.  This led to the Catholic Church in Nigeria withdrawing its membership of the association.  The present utterances of the Northern Chapter of CAN show that they have not repented of their past.  They need to forsake their past transgressions and return to the scriptures.  That’s the only way they can find resurrection and maybe, those who left the association may then return.

     

    • Onochie writes from Abuja.
  • CBN’s stress test shows two banks in trouble

    CBN’s stress test shows two banks in trouble

    The Capital Adequacy Ratios (CARs) of  two banks have fallen below regulatory capital requirement of 10 per cent, the result of stress test conducted by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) on the status of the banking system has revealed.

    The solvency stress test, contained in the Financial Stability Report, released yesterday by the CBN governor,  Godwin Emefiele, classified lenders into three groups: large banks, those with assets greater than or equal to N1 trillion; medium banks with assets greater than or equal to N500 billion but less than N1 trillion and small banks with assets of less than N500 billion.

    The CAR is a ratio of bank’s assets to its risks and is 10 per cent for national banks and 15 per cent for banks with international subsidiaries and 16 per cent for Systematically Important Banks (SIBs). The test result showed that one of the affected banks had CAR of 1.29 per cent before the test, while two banks had 0.78 per cent and 8.2 per cent after the test.

    The stress test captured the idiosyncratic nature of individual bank’s balance sheet and macro-prudential concerns, using the bottom-up and top-down approaches. The exercise covered the 23 commercial and merchant banks, using the credit, liquidity, interest, foreign exchange rates and foreign exchange trading risks elements.

    The report, which measured the lenders’ positions as at December last year, showed that overall, there was high risk through unsecured interbank exposure.

    The result of the test also revealed that after a one-day run, the liquidity ratio for the industry would decline to 33.4 per cent from the 48.57 per cent pre-shock position and to 10.24 per cent after a cumulative 30-day run. A five-day and cumulative 30-day run on the banking industry would result in a liquidity shortfall of N1.79 trillion and N1.93 trillion, respectively.

    The test further revealed that 17 and 20 banks would record liquidity ratios below the prudential threshold of 30 per cent, following the five-day and cumulative 30-day run, respectively.

    There was a marginal decline in the quality of assets in the banking industry last December, compared with the position at end of June 2015. The ratio of non-performing loans to gross loans increased by 0.21 percentage point to 4.86 per cent while the decline in asset quality was attributed to the unfavourable macro-economic environment in the review period.

    The banking industry and large banks’ resilience to credit risk was robust. A simulated severe shock of a 200 per cent rise in NPLs resulted in CARs of 12.77 and 16.52 per cent for banking industry and large banks, respectively, which were above the 10 per cent required regulatory minimum.

    However, medium and small bank groups showed vulnerabilities to severe shocks of 200 per cent rise in NPLs as their CARs fell to 7.16 and 6.85 per cent respectively.

    Emefiele said the general decline in commodity prices, China’s efforts at rebalancing its economy and the gradual tightening in US monetary policy all combined to hamper growth in many emerging market economies, including Nigeria.

    He said the key task that faced monetary authorities in Nigeria in the reporting period centered on the use of effective policy tools to ensure that the shocks arising from instability in the global economy were not fully transmitted to the domestic economy.

    The CBN, he said, continued to ensure that the stability of the financial system was maintained and confidence in the system was sustained. The policy tool kit included both conventional and unconventional measures and these enabled us to respond to the emerging challenges.

  • Trouble with Buhari budget

    Trouble with Buhari budget

    Trust Nigerians, they have since been voicing out their concerns not just on the size of President Muhammadu Buhari Budget 2016 but also the contents of the fiscal instrument expected to signpost change. Yes, not a few, have been mystified by its expansionary outlay in a period of vastly declining national revenues. With oil prices showing no signs of imminent rebound, and in the unlikelihood of revenues from non-oil sources making up for the gap in the near time, and now with debt –re-emerging as a principal factor in our public finance matrix –naturally, there ought to be a lot to talk. After all, it is barely a decade after our celebrated exit from the debtor cartel of London and Paris Clubs –subsequent to which we are supposed to suffer the debt allergy.

    To suggest that the issues are being properly framed is however a different matter. I do not want to delve into PDP’s characterisation of the N6.8 trillion budget as “a big fraud and executive conspiracy tailored towards mortgaging the future of the nation”. If Nigerians are any bemused by the PDP’s rant especially its verbose dismissal of the budget as “completely unrealistic and duplicitously embellished with impractical predication”, I’ll say that they ought to have better things to do than listen to the tutorials from a party that was midwife to the most profligate administration ever to known to man! Recall that under PDP’s disastrous rule, total earnings not only exceeded those of previous administration combined, yet the party left the country faring worse under all known indices of human development!

    And so I speak of well-founded concerns that have been expressed in some quarters about the budget. I start with the rather ambitious revenue projection of N3.86 trillion in a year the federal government plans to spend N6.08 trillion – hence a N2.2 trillion deficit. Much as the idea of a deficit is not necessarily a bad one– no matter that it is a mere 2.16 percent of the debt-GDP ratio – the option of borrowing to fix the gap says pretty little about our experience of fiscal rectitude –or lack thereof. Are we not living witnesses to huge loans contracted on humongous terms which in the end delivered pretty little by way of value? As if the assumption that the managers of the economy have learnt their lessons from past experience of debt management is not dangerous enough, the administration appears to have glossed over capacity issues that have dogged every cycle of budget implementation.

    In any case, the key assumptions of the budget must be seen as troubling enough. At a time a record number of our crude vessels are said to be stranded at sea looking for buyers, the Buhari administration obviously did not think it a bad idea to count the chicks before they are hatched. If you ask me – again I’ll say that the administration’s bet on pumping 2.2 million barrels of crude daily is hardly the way to wean the country off its addiction to oil! As for the $38 a barrel benchmark – another key assumption – is it a case of the administration’s hierarchs knowing something about the dynamics of oil price that Nigerians, nay the rest of the world do not know at this time?

    Agreed, the options for getting the country out of the cul-de-sac are somewhat very limited at this time. Were the nation’s infrastructural gaps not as wide as we currently have; or the institutions not so broken to such an extent that any talk of putting a foundation for economic recovery on it seems domed ab initio; and the unemployment situation so grave as to constitute a national security issue, we’d probably have enough time to debate on the niceties of massive public expenditure cuts or some modest efforts to align expenditure with revenue – which for all practical purposes seems at the moment the surest route to nowhere.  It’s probably one luxury we cannot afford given the dire emergency.

    So, I do not think the option is for the country to do nothing as the wailers appear to suggest. In fact, I am willing to endorse the general principles behind the budget in so far as it recognises that some bold, expansionary measures (which the government seems best placed to put in place particularly at this time) are needed to give fillip to the economy. The implementation of the conditional cash transfer of N5,000 to the under-class – a novelty – promises to be interesting just as the school feeding programme is potentially revolutionary.  I will aver in the same breathe that the 30 percent planned spend on capital projects, though rather modest, is a positive move given that the need for the realignment of the capital-recurrent component goes to the heart of our budget problem. Although it is still early in the day to make definitive affirmations on outcomes, the mere fact that successive PDP administrations found it impossible to move in any concrete way in that direction for the whole of 16 years obviously makes it a plus for the Buhari administration.

    Still, there are many things wrong with the so-called ‘budget of change’. It is broadly, as far as I can see, more of the same. The quest to prune the cost of running the bureaucracy remains largely, unconquerable. Our bureaucratic cart continues to drive (or if you like – drag), the development horse. President Buhari’s wish is therefore one thing; our smart Alec bureaucrats and their allies in the political establishment will almost inevitably have their ways. Talk of assortment of projects with dubious economic utility; a budget stuffed with pork and earmarks – there you have them in plenitude in the budget of change.

    Samples. I look at the huge votes for choice toys for officials – the billions to be spent on exotic cars – by both the executive and the legislature; I cannot but wonder if these are meant for tourists or wayfarers as opposed to public servants. I understand why shelling out huge sums in foreign exchange to procure the fancy toys would keep our big men happy; however, for an administration that promises to do things differently, we expected things to at least reflect current moods. It’s hard to imagine that this is happening at a time Godwin Emefiele and company at the apex bank have taken on the drastic measure of clamping down on petty users of foreign exchange like our students abroad; a time when traders in the 41-odd items precluded from access to foreign exchange have become overnight economic refugees. I thought that our lordships would, if only for the sake of symbolism, reflect upon their lust for the exotica and show solidarity with the rest of us for once!  The same goes for the residences proposed for the trio of Vice President, Senate President and Speaker, House of Representatives at a princely cost of N5 billion. At this time – and from funds known to be largely borrowed? To the extent that no one has yet told us that these gentlemen sleep in the streets of Abuja, some of those capital projections surely, can wait!

    Happy New Year to you all!