Tag: Trump

  • U.S., China hold trade talks in London after Trump’s phone call with Xi

    U.S., China hold trade talks in London after Trump’s phone call with Xi

    High-level delegations from the United States and China met in London yesterday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy,

    A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng was due to hold talks with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at a U.K. government building.

    The talks, which are expected to last at least a day, follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war.

    The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession.

    The U.S. and China are the world’s biggest and second-biggest economies. Chinese trade data shows that exports to the United States fell 35% in May from a year earlier.

    Read Also: NSCDC boss asks Mining Marshals Commander to withdraw petition

    Since the Geneva talks, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, “ rare earths ” that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities.

    President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the following day that the trade talks would resume in London.

    The U.K. government says it is providing the venue and logistics but is not involved in the talks, though British Treasury chief Rachel Reeves met with both Bessent and He on Sunday.

    “We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody’s interests, so we welcome these talks,” the British government said in a statement.

  • National Guard troops deployed in LA amid standoff with Trump

    National Guard troops deployed in LA amid standoff with Trump

    National Guard troops were deployed to Los Angeles on Sunday amid ongoing protests against immigration raids, in spite of California Governor Gavin Newsom’ s objections.

    Newsom formally requested the Trump administration to rescind the order to deploy the troops.

    The governor made the request via a letter to Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, which he then shared on X.

    “We didn’t have a problem until (U.S. President Donald]) Trump got involved.

    “This is a serious breach of state sovereignty – inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they’re actually needed,” Newsom wrote.

    “Rescind the order. Return control to California.”

    Trump signed a memorandum on Saturday deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen “to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,” the White House said.

    An expert cited by The New York Times said this is the first time in 60 years that a president has deployed a state’s National Guard without the governor’s consent.

    The last instance was in 1965, when President Lyndon B Johnson used troops to protect predominantly Black demonstrators during the civil rights movement in Alabama.

    The protests began on Friday after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers executed search warrants across the city as Trump pushed forward with his goal of mass deportations of undocumented immigrants.

    Newsom appealed to protesters to remain peaceful and not give the government an excuse to act.

    “Trump is trying to manufacture a crisis in LA County — deploying troops not for order, but to create chaos,” he wrote on X.

    “Don’t take the bait. Never use violence or harm law enforcement.”

    Los Angeles Police said protests continued on Sunday, even when authorities had declared it an ulawful gathering.

    Protesters had blocked traffic on a freeway and had gathered outside the Metropolitan Detention Centre where soldiers had formed a perimeter around the building.

    “Officers are reporting that people in the crowd are throwing concrete, bottles and other objects. Arrests are being initiated,” police wrote on X.

    Cars had also been stopped and set alight on roads, the police said.

    An Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the guard “has deployed approximately 300 soldiers to 3 separate locations in the greater Los Angeles area, the U.S. Northern Command posted on X.

    “They are conducting safety and protection of federal property and personnel,” it added.

    In a post on Truth Social, Trump said Los Angeles had been “invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals.”

    “Now violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations. But these lawless riots only strengthen our resolve,” he wrote.

    He had directed his officials “to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots,” he said.

    “Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free.”

    Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the city would “always stand” with those who call it home.

    “Deploying federalised troops on the heels of these raids is a chaotic escalation,” she wrote on X.

    “The fear people are feeling in our city right now is very real – it’s felt in our communities and within our families and it puts our neighborhoods at risk.

    “This is the last thing that our city needs, and I urge protestors to remain peaceful,” Bass said.

    “Los Angeles will always stand with everyone who calls our city home.”

    Trump’s administration has threatened to deploy regular armed forces domestically, which would represent an even greater breach of norms.

    Hegseth stated that, if necessary, U.S. Marines stationed in California could also be mobilised.

    Newsom condemned Hegseth’s threat to deploy U.S. soldiers against its own citizens on U.S. soil, calling it “deranged behavior” in a post on X.

    Hegseth responded to Newsom on X stating that the National Guard “and Marines if need be” stood with ICE.

    “There is plenty of room for peaceful protest, but ZERO tolerance for attacking federal agents who are doing their job,” he wrote.

    The U.S. Northern Command said about 500 Marines were “in a prepared to deploy status” should they be needed.

    (dpa/NAN) 

  • Court blocks Trump’s ban on foreign Harvard students

    Court blocks Trump’s ban on foreign Harvard students

    A U.S. federal judge has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from enforcing a ban that would prevent Harvard University from admitting international students.

    Judge Allison Burroughs, based in Massachusetts, issued the restraining order, stating that Harvard—the oldest university in the United States—would suffer “immediate and irreparable injury” if the ban were implemented.

    The ruling follows a lawsuit filed by Harvard on Thursday, accusing former President Donald Trump of launching a “government vendetta” aimed at silencing free speech on campus.

    Trump defended the policy on national security grounds and criticized Harvard for allegedly failing to combat antisemitism among its student body.

    Judge Burroughs’ order came just hours after Harvard amended an ongoing lawsuit against the federal government, arguing that the president’s actions were “part of a concerted and escalating campaign of retaliation” against the university for exercising its First Amendment rights.

    Read Also: Trump bans citizens of 12 countries from entering U.S.

    Harvard President Alan Garber said in a statement that the university is preparing contingency plans for international students who may be unable to travel to campus.

    The elite institution, often cited as the world’s wealthiest university, has been locked in a legal dispute with the Trump administration, which froze billions in federal funding and accused Harvard of not addressing antisemitism adequately.

    In May, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem revoked Harvard’s certification to host international students—a decision quickly overturned by a judge. Another federal judge upheld that decision last week, indicating a longer-term injunction would be issued to allow foreign students to continue their education while the legal case unfolds.

    The judge’s intervention came in response to Trump’s latest order issued on Wednesday, which suspended—for an initial six-month period—the entry of foreign students planning to enroll or participate in exchange programs at Harvard.

    Trump’s proclamation accused Harvard of having “extensive entanglements” with foreign governments and of continuing to “flout the civil rights of its students and faculty.”

    For the 2024–2025 academic year, Harvard enrolled nearly 7,000 international students, representing 27% of its total student body.

  • New proposed U.S. tax will cost Nigeria $215m in remittances

    New proposed U.S. tax will cost Nigeria $215m in remittances

    President Donald Trump’s proposed bill aimed at taxing remittances sent to foreign countries from the United States could erase $215m revenue to Nigeria.

    The bill, which is subsumed under Mr Trump’s ‘One Big, Beautiful Bill’, allows the U.S. to take a cut of all remittances sent to foreign countries, a move believed to be detrimental to the survival of people, especially in low-income countries. According to the New York Times, the passage of the bill would be the latest sign of a U.S. retreat from Africa, after Mr Trump’s slashing of foreign aid and introduction of unprecedented tariffs on the African continent. Critics observed that the proposed legislation would mandate immigrants to pay an additional 3.5 per cent federal tax on top of the roughly six per cent they pay banks and remittance companies, amounting to nearly $10 of every $100, which would make the U.S. the most expensive of the countries from which to send cash from.

    They said that Nigerians would pay the most under the bill in absolute terms, losing approximately $215 million, with Senegal, The Gambia, and Liberia also expected to be affected by the bill.

    Helen Dempster, a policy fellow and assistant director for the Migration, Displacement, and Humanitarian Policy Programme at the Centre for Global Development, said countries in Africa would be hit the hardest should the bill pass.

    Read Also: ‘Prompt tax payment recipe for revenue collectors’, embarrassment’

    “For the poorest people on the planet, they are going to be hit twice by the various different steps that the U.S. administration is taking,” Ms Dempster said in an interview with the New York Times. The policy expert noted that the bill intended to discourage people from relocating to the United States while forcing those in the country to consider self-deportation. Analysts also described the proposed legislation as a designed attack on the magnanimity of the diaspora, adding it risks plunging millions deeper into hunger while pushing up illegal migration and slowing growth for African economies already mired in debt.

    Last month, Mr Trump offered to pay a $1,000 stipend as travel assistance to migrants who decided to deport themselves from the U.S. voluntarily. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the policy covered part of Mr Trump’s administration’s push to encourage immigrants to deport themselves as a way to help the president meet lofty immigration promises in the country.

  • FULL LIST: 12 countries affected by Trump’s new U.S. travel ban 

    FULL LIST: 12 countries affected by Trump’s new U.S. travel ban 

    U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed a proclamation banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States.

    Nationals from these countries will be “fully” restricted from entering the U.S., according to the proclamation.

    Similarly, the entry of nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted.

    The proclamation is effective on June 9, 2025 at 12:01 am EDT (5:01am Nigerian time).

    Trump said the move was needed to protect the U.S. against “foreign terrorists” and other security threats.

    “We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,” Trump said in a video posted on X.

    The U.S. President said the list could be revised and new countries could be added.

    He said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbour a “large-scale presence of terrorists”.

    He alleged others failed to cooperate on visa security and had an inability to verify travellers’ identities, inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the U.S..

    Read Also: FULL LIST: 42 countries eligible to enter China without a visa

    “We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States,” Trump said.

    Trump’s directive is part of an immigration crackdown that he launched at the start of his second term, pledging to restrict people from the Gaza Strip, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and “anywhere else that threatens our security”.

    Here are 12 Countries affected by Trump’s new U.S. travel ban  

    1. Afghanistan

    2. Myanmar

    3. Chad

    4. Congo

    5. Equatorial Guinea

    6. Eritrea

    7. Haiti

    8. Iran

    9. Libya

    10. Somalia

    11. Sudan

    12. Yemen

    Here are 7 Countries affected by Trump’s new U.S. partial travel ban  

    1. Burundi

    2. Cuba

    3. Laos

    4. Sierra Leone

    5. Togo

    6. Turkmenistan

    7. Venezuela

  • Trump bans citizens of 12 countries from entering U.S.

    Trump bans citizens of 12 countries from entering U.S.

    U.S. President Donald Trump has signed a proclamation on Wednesday evening banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States.

    The countries affected are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen.

    Nationals from these countries will be “fully” restricted from entering the U.S., according to the proclamation.

    Similarly, the entry of nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted.

    The proclamation is effective on June 9, 2025 at 12:01 am EDT (5:01am Nigerian time).

    Trump said the move was needed to protect the U.S. against “foreign terrorists” and other security threats.

    “We will not allow people to enter our country who wish to do us harm,” Trump said in a video posted on X.

    The U.S. President said the list could be revised and new countries could be added.

    He said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbour a “large-scale presence of terrorists”.

    He alleged others failed to cooperate on visa security and had an inability to verify travellers’ identities, inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the U.S..

    “We cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States,” Trump said.

    Read Also: Canada facing challenges as Trump threatens annexation, says King Charles

    Trump’s directive is part of an immigration crackdown that he launched at the start of his second term, pledging to restrict people from the Gaza Strip, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen and “anywhere else that threatens our security”.

    Trump issued an executive order on January 20 requiring intensified security vetting of any foreigners seeking admission to the U.S. to detect national security threats.

    That order directed several cabinet members to submit a list of countries from which travel should be partly or fully suspended because their “vetting and screening information is so deficient.”

    During his first term in office, Trump had announced a ban on travellers from seven countries, a policy that generated so much controversies before it was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018.

    However, former President Joe Biden, who succeeded Trump, repealed the ban in 2021, calling it “a stain on our national conscience.”

    (NAN)

  • Desecration of Oval Office by Trump

    Desecration of Oval Office by Trump

    • By Olabode Lucas

    The Oval Office in the White House is the official office of the President of the United States of America in Washington D.C. It is an office known all over the world because the President of the USA is the most powerful political office holder in the world.

    It was in that office that Franklin D. Roosevelt, the 32nd President of the USA, took the decision to declare war on Japan in 1941 after the Pearl Harbour attack, and the consequent support of the Allies in the Second World War. Also, decisions to send US citizens to fight in the unnecessary Korean and Vietnam wars must have been taken in this office. These decisions no doubt led to the death of many young US citizens.

    On the brighter side, it was in this office that President John Kennedy signed the USAID bill in 1963, while the landmark Civil Rights Bill that tried to officially end racism in the USA was signed in this same office by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965. One cannot forget also that President Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky turned the office into their love nest between 1995 and 1997.

    In view of the exalted position of the USA in the world, many world leaders usually feel honoured to be invited to the Oval Office in the White House for bilateral discussions with sitting US Presidents. Many prominent and powerful world leaders like Winston Churchill of Great Britain, De Gaulle of France, Willy Brandt of Germany, Chou En Lai of China, Brezhnev and Gorbachev of Soviet Union had, at one time or the other, been received at the Oval Office. Even Emperor Hirohito of Japan, whose country was devastated by the USA Atomic Bomb during the Second World War, was received in the Oval Office by President Ford in 1975.

    From Africa, leaders like Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, William Tubman of Liberia, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa and Chief Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria had also been received in the Oval Office by US Presidents.

    There is no record that these world leaders were humiliated during their meetings in the Oval Office with US Presidents. They were accorded the best of diplomatic treatment, irrespective of the importance and size of their countries.

    Now, with Donald Trump as US President, this is no longer the situation as reception of foreign Heads of State at the Oval Office is like going to a minefield of insults and abuses.

    Trump started his show of shame at the Oval Office with the beleaguered Volodymyr Zelensky, the President of Ukraine, when he visited Trump in February 2025. Zelensky, whose country is engaged in a war of survival with oppressive Russia under the diminutive Valdimir Putin, came to the meeting in the Oval Office as an underdog because he badly needed US military support to withstand the ferocious assault of Russia on his country.

    In their discussion, Trump thoroughly humiliated Zelensky by telling him bluntly to cooperate with Russia in its intention to annex a big chunk of Ukraine’s territory. He also told Zelensky that he was risking the Third World War with his obduracy in not reaching an agreement with Russia. J. D. Vance, the pliable US Vice President, waded in at the meeting to openly accuse Zelensky of his ingratitude to the USA by not acknowledging the support that the USA has given his country.

    Read Also: FG to equip 12 universities with high-fibre internet, 24-hour electricity

    King Abdullahi of Jordan brought his loyalty to the Oval Office only to be rubbished by Trump during the king’s visit. Trump pointedly told the king, who was the first Arab leader to visit him at the Oval Office after his election, that he had the plan to evacuate the Palestinians from Gaza after the Gaza war so that the place can be turned, according to him, to Gaza Riviera, a holiday resort to be visited by rich holiday makers from the West. This was nothing more than ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.  At the meeting, Trump refused to listen to the king, who came to present to him the collective plan of all the Arab countries for Gaza after the war. The king left the Oval Office in a confused state after Trump had shown disdain and contempt for the plan he came to discuss with him.

    Next to visit Trump in the Oval Office was Keir Starmer of the United Kingdom who, despite the so- called special relationship between the USA and the United Kingdom, could only get a tepid reception from Trump, despite showing him an invitation from King Charles III for a second state visit to the United Kingdom.

    The visit of the new Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney, to the Oval Office to meet Trump, three weeks ago, was equally tense. Carney, a thoroughbred finance expert, was a former Governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada. He has not been long in politics, but he ran in the last election in Canada, which brought him to power on an anti-Trump slogan as he was able to capitalise on Canadians’ resentment of Trump’s obsession to make Canada the 51st state of USA. Carney, leading the Liberal Party of Canada, was able to use this resentment to overturn the pre-election 20% lead of the Conservative Party to win the last parliamentary election in Canada in April.

    A few weeks after becoming the Prime Minister of Canada, he visited Trump in the Oval Office. At the meeting, Trump repeated his desire to make Canada the 51st state of the US. He promptly told Carney that as a real estate practitioner, he knew what was good for Canada. Carney won the hearts of his fellow Canadians by cutting Trump down to size on this issue with his reply. He told Trump that as a real estate expert he should know that there were edifices that could never be on sale. He cited the White House and Buckingham Palace as examples of such edifices; and then told Trump, without any equivocation, that Canada, like those two edifices, was not for sale.

    Recently, it was the turn of Cyril Ramaphosa, the President of South Africa, to be humiliated at the Oval Office. Before this meeting, many observers felt that Ramaphosa was walking into a lion’s den by accepting the invitation to visit Trump. This was because prior to this meeting, Trump was having issues with the government of South Africa. A few weeks before this meeting, the US government had expelled South African Ambassador to the US, Ibrahim Rasul, for being “a race baiting politician,” according to Marco Rubio, US Secretary of State.

    Also, Trump, who is an ardent supporter of Isreal, was not happy that South Africa, under Ramaphosa, took Israel to the International Court of Justice at The Hague for violating its obligation under the Genocide Convention in its war in the Gaza strip against the Palestinians. In addition, Trump had also cut all fundings to South Africa.

    At the meeting in the Oval Office, Trump used the opportunity to allege falsely that the white farmers in South Africa were being subjected to genocide. He showed a video clip where the fiery Julius Malema, the leader of South Africa Economic Freedom Fighters, was showing his frustration on the slow land reforms in South Africa.  Trump also showed unverified newspaper pictures and stories of supposedly killing fields in South Africa, some of which were found to be taken in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

    Many commentators felt that Trump successfully ambushed Ramaphosa with his actions at this meeting.  Ramaphosa, who is reputed to be a skilled negotiator, kept his cool at this meeting. He came to the meeting with some eminent South African whites who told Trump that the whites in South Africa were not in any way under any threat of genocide, and that the problem of South Africa was its horrendous crime rate, which affects the black South Africans more than the privileged white South Africans.

    Many people had criticised the performance of Ramaphosa for being too cool and conciliatory to Trump. He was virtually begging Trump to come to the next meeting of G12 countries taking place in South Africa later this year. Also, his regular smiles to please Trump at the meeting were irritating to me. However, in my opinion, Ramaphosa has, through his performance, shown to the whole world that Trump is nothing more than an apostle of injustice because of his unbridled support of the whites in South Africa who controlled almost 80% of the country’s economy, despite the fact that they are only 7% of the population.

    It is a lesson to other African leaders that they should not rush to visit Trump at the Oval Office, which he has desecrated and turned into an arena for rubbishing world leaders who fail to kowtow to his racist agenda to ‘Make America Great Again.’

    •Lucas writes from Old Bodija, Ibadan, Oyo State

  • Trump blasts Putin as Russia targets Ukraine

    Trump blasts Putin as Russia targets Ukraine

    Russia launched its biggest drone attack against Ukraine overnight, a Ukrainian official said  yesterday, part of an escalating bombing campaign that has further dashed hopes for a breakthrough in efforts to end the theree-year-old war.

    On the third straight night of significant aerial bombardments, U.S. President Donald Trump lashed out at Russian leader Vladimir Putin, saying he had gone “crazy” by stepping up attacks on Ukraine.

    The expansion of Russia’s air campaign appeared to be another setback to U.S.-led peace efforts, as Putin looks determined to capture more Ukrainian territory and inflict more damage. It comes after Kyiv accepted an unconditional 30-day ceasefire in March that was proposed by the U.S. but that Moscow effectively rejected.

    This month alone, Russia has broken its record for aerial bombardments of Ukraine three times.

    Russia is also still pushing along the roughly 1,000-kilometre (620-mile) front line, where it has made slow and costly progress, and is assembling its forces for a summer offensive, analysts said.

    “Only a sense of complete impunity can allow Russia to carry out such attacks and continually escalate their scale,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram  yesterday. “There is no significant military logic to this, but there is considerable political meaning.”

    Read Also: Govt gives panel four weeks to design disposal plan for 753-unit Abuja estate

    The Russian bombardment on Sunday night included 355 drones, Yuriy Ihnat, head of the Ukrainian air force’s communications department, told The Associated Press, calling it the biggest of the war.

    The previous night, Russia fired 298 drones and 69 missiles in what Ukrainian officials said was the largest combined aerial assault of the conflict. From Friday to Sunday, Russia launched around 900 drones at Ukraine, officials said.

    Russia’s Defence Ministry, meanwhile, said  yesterday that its forces shot down 103 Ukrainian drones overnight that were flying over southern and western Russia, including near Moscow. Russia’s Federal Air Transport Agency said 32 flights scheduled to land at three Moscow airports on Sunday and  yesterday had to divert amid Ukrainian drone attacks.

    The numbers from Ukraine and Russia could not be independently verified.

    Soon after Russia’s Feb. 24, 2022, invasion, the conflict became a testing ground for increasingly sophisticated drone warfare. Drones are generally cheaper to produce than missiles.

    Russia has received Iranian-made Shahed drones since 2022 and is now believed to be manufacturing its own version. Ukraine, as well as receiving smaller battlefield drones from its allies to help it compensate for a troop shortage, has developed its own long-range drones for strikes deep inside Russia.

     Yesterday, the European Union’s top diplomat, foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, described Russia’s latest attacks as “totally appalling” and said the bloc intended to impose more sanctions on Moscow.

    Trump has threatened massive sanctions, too, but so far hasn’t taken action. But he made it clear Sunday night that he is losing patience with Putin.

    “I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!” Trump wrote in a social media post.

    Trump said Putin is “needlessly killing a lot of people,” pointing out that “missiles and drones are being shot into cities in Ukraine, for no reason whatsoever.”

    The U.S. president also expressed frustration with Zelenskyy, saying that he is “doing his Country no favors by talking the way he does.”

    Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Putin makes decisions that are necessary to ensure Russia’s security and that the attacks were Moscow’s response to deep strikes by Ukraine.

    He said negotiations are at “a decisive moment that is linked to emotional overloading for everyone and emotional reactions.”

    Russia and Ukraine swapped hundreds more prisoners Sunday in the third and last part of a major exchange. All told, each side released more than 1,000 prisoners — soldiers and civilians — in the biggest swap of the war.

  • How Trump altered images to support claims of ‘White genocide’ in South Africa

    How Trump altered images to support claims of ‘White genocide’ in South Africa

     In his Oval Office meeting Wednesday with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, President Trump made allegations of persecution of White farmers in South Africa, which he used to justify granting refugee status to a group of Afrikaners earlier this month.

    Ramaphosa denied there is genocide, and some Afrikaners say Trump is being lied to about a “White genocide” in the country.

    In the last three months of 2024, 12 people were murdered on farms in South Africa, according to South African police. One was a White farmer, while the others were Black labourers or security workers, police said.

    Some estimates say in recent years there have been about 50 farm murders a year, but those do not specify race. The country had nearly 27,000 total murders last year, according to police data.

    Trump played videos and held up articles during the White House meeting this week to support his unsubstantiated claims. But much of what he showed was being misrepresented. Here are three examples:

    Read Also: President Tinubu’s unprecedented commitment to Nigerian athletes

    Trump held up a printed article from “American Thinker,” a conservative online magazine, that included a screenshot, credited to Reuters, that the president said showed “all White farmers that are being buried.”

    But the video the screenshot was taken from was of humanitarian workers lifting body bags in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Reuters said. The footage was taken in February after deadly battles with a Rwanda-backed Congolese rebel group in the city of Goma.

    The “American Thinker” article was about both the Congo and South Africa, but the image does not show South Africa. Andrea Widburg, managing editor at “American Thinker” and the author of the post, told Reuters that Trump had “misidentified the image.”

    Trump claimed images of white crosses seen in the video played during his meeting with Ramaphosa showed burial sites of White farmers. However, the crosses were symbolic, part of a protest in 2020 after the killing of a White farming couple, according to local media coverage. A participant said they represented all farm murders, not solely White farmers, over the years.

    The demonstration, held near Normandien, South Africa, was calling on the government to take more action against farm killings.

    Ramaphosa acknowledged a problem of crime in his country.

    “There is criminality in our country,” he said to Trump. “People, who do get killed unfortunately through criminal activity, are not only White people. Majority of them are Black people.”

    The video Trump presented included clips of Julius Malema, the leader of a far-left South African political party, the Economic Freedom Fighters. He is heard singing an anti-apartheid song that includes the lyric, “kill the Boer,” referring to White farmers, in multiple clips from recent years.

    Malema was kicked out of Ramaphosa’s governing party, African National Congress, 13 years ago, and Ramaphosa said the EFF is a “small minority party” that does not represent the government. The ANC also distanced itself from the song more than a decade ago.

    In a statement to Reuters after the meeting between Trump and Ramaphosa, the EFF said the song “expresses the desire to destroy the system of white minority control over the resources of South Africa.”

    Three South African courts have ruled against attempts to have it designated as hate speech, saying it is a historical liberation chant, not a literal incitement to violence, Reuters reported.

  • Trump, Malema, Ramaphosa and the Oval Office grill

    Trump, Malema, Ramaphosa and the Oval Office grill

    • By Chief Femi Fani-Kayode

    It was quite a show at the Oval Office in the White House a few days ago when South African President Cyril Ramaphosa met with American President Donald J. Trump to discuss bilateral issues and world affairs.

    It began with Trump’s unsubstantiated and frankly asinine allegation that the white Boers of South Africa are being subjected to mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide.

    This is not only false but also painfully absurd.

    Sadly it did not stop there. Trump went on to assert that Julius Malema, the inspirational charismatic and colourful M.P. and leader and founder of the South African Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), is a hate-filled black supremacist and racist and a cold-blooded murderer and ruthless terrorist whose intention it is to kill every white person in South Africa.

    Needless to say these allegations are baseless and false. The Americans are attempting to give a dog a bad name in order to hang it. It is nothing but yet another well-crafted but unsubstantiated mendacity.

    Even though Malema is very vocal and highly controversial, he does not strike me as a hater of whites but rather as a hater of injustice, oppression, persecution and institutional racism.

    He is a man with a social conscience who speaks for the poor, the weak, the vulnerable and the oppressed and who has constituted himself into a major thorn in the flesh of the political establishment and the ruling elites in South Africa both white and black.

    He is very eloquent, well-informed, well-read and quick off the mark and these qualities, coupled with his obvious courage and strength, make him a formidable adversary which every person of class, rank or privilege in his country has every reason to be wary of.

    He also speaks a good deal of sense and his passion for truth, justice and equity for the black majority population of South Africa and commitment to the emancipation of the African continent from the forces of imperialism and neo-colonialism cannot be denied.

    To millions of South Africans Malema is a deeply courageous, insightful and profound man and possibly the greatest post-Mandela hero and rising star that their nation has ever known.

    To add to this millions of Africans (including Nigerians and Zimbabweans) who live in South Africa regard him as a loyal and trusted friend who has always spoken up for them and sought to protect them from the rabid xenophobia that most black South Africans suffer from and who has a strong and commendable Nkrumaist Pan-African vision.  

    For Trump and his White House to attempt to disparage such a man that brings so much to the table and that has done so much to restore the self-respect and dignity of black South Africans and Africans all over the world simply because he sang an old outdated, pre-independence, apartheid-era, anti-Boer war song at his political party rally is uncharitable and unkind.

    Read Also: Trump revokes Harvard University’s authority to enroll foreign students

    To turn down the lights of the Oval office, watch a film on him on television for four good minutes and make him the centre of discussion at a bilateral meeting between the Presidents of two of the most respected nations on earth only proves the fact that he is no longer only an African phenomenon but also a global brand and a rallying point for blacks from all over the world.

    To that extent Trump has inadvertently elevated his profile rather than diminish it.

    Like in the case of the Biblical Joseph, what Trump meant for evil, God meant for good.

    Yet perhaps the most shameful thing that Trump did on that day was not what he attempted to do to Malema but rather the following.

    He presented a picture to Ramaphosa and his delegation of what was purportedly “1000 white South African graves with white crosses on them of white South African farmers” that were supposedly “dispossessed of their land by black terrorists” and “murdered in cold blood”.

    Contrary to the American Presidents assertions it was later confirmed that the picture was NOT of the graves of white farmers in South Africa but rather of a burial ground in a completely different country called Congo!

    One wonders how the President of the most powerful nation on earth could make such an egregious and monumental blunder and indulge in such deceit and doublespeak all in an attempt to humiliate the South African President.

    Sadly it didn’t stop there. Trump literally ambushed Ramaphosa, lectured him, bullied him, spoke down to him, accused his government and people of heinous crimes, kept interrupting him when he attempted to speak, mocked his role as a peacemaker in the Ukraine/Russia conflict and sought to utterly humiliate him.

    To behave in this unacceptable manner and indulge in such mendacious falsehood is below any President let alone the most powerful one in the world.

    I see the hand of Elon Musk, who himself is a South African and who has not hidden his contempt and disdain for the ANC-led South African Government and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanhayu, whose government has been accused by South Africa of genocide and indeed taken to the International Court of Justice and to the International Criminal Court both at the Hague, in all this.

    Both must have thoroughly enjoyed the spectacle!

    Yet the truth is that even if his predominately white right-wing MAGA base in America may have been excited and thrilled by his proverbial lynching and carpeting of a helpless and whimpering black President at the Oval office it has also alienated a lot of black and particularly African Trumpers like yours truly who have always refused to regard Trump as a racist but rather as a man who was specially chosen, prepared, raised and anointed by God to destroy the American Deep State, to terminate the Godless agenda of the globalists, to stop the wars of the world, to put God at the centre of affairs when it comes to politics and governance, to re-establish and re-instill the Christian virtues and values that America was built on, to break the back of the unholy, Luciferean trinity and anti-Christ philosophy of Obama, Clinton and Biden in world affairs and American politics.

    I sincerely hope that we do not end up regretting our support for him but if he continues in this way that support shall undoubtedly dwindle.

    Why do I say this? Consider the following.

    First it was “let us grab Greenland, Canada, Mexico, the Panama Canal, the Suez Canal and rename the Gulf of Persia”, then it was “let us turn Gaza into an American Riviera”, then it was “let us wage a tariff war against the nations of the world”, then it was “let us alienate and abandon our European allies”, then it was “let us provoke China”, then it was “let us go to the three richest nations in the Middle East and compel their Kings to invest trillions of dollars in America and even give us a new presidential  jet”, then it was “let us bring the little African leader who leads a country with the largest and most prosperous economy on his continent to the Oval office, humiliate him before the world and bully him into leaving our white brothers in South Africa alone” and the latest is “let us stop foreign students from attending Harvard University because the authorities of that school have refused to bring to an end the pro-Palestinian demonstrations that are taking place on campus”. 

    These actions are increasingly troubling, and whether we have hitherto admired, loved and prayed for Trump or not, we cannot support a confirmed bully and racist. That would be ungodly.

    We cannot support a man that finds it difficult to empathise with the suffering of others or that is fast losing his humanity. That would be incorrigible.

    Trump needs to retrace his steps, divest himself of these glaring and obvious symptoms of megalomania, obsessive vanity and extreme narcissism and get real.

    God did not deliver him from the hands of his enemies and make him President to do this sort of nonsense but rather to make America great again and to make the world a better and safer place. If he fails to do this God will leave him, remove him and replace him with another.

    Back to the episode at the White House.

    Cyril Ramaphosa’s responses to the grilling were equally embarrassing and frankly disappointing.

    Most western commentators have described his disposition, body language and reaction as “weak”, “cowardly” and “cringe worthy” and I am constrained to concur.

    No President should bow and tremble before another no matter how rich and powerful the latter may be.

    In the African context Nelson Mandela would not have done so and neither would Murtala Mohammed, Olusegun Obasanjo, Jerry Rawlings, Thomas Sankara, Ahmed Ben Bella, Muammar Ghadafi, Patrice Lumumba, Gamal Nasser, Sani Abacha, Ibrahim Babangida, Kwame Nkrumah, Muhammadu Buhari, Robert Mugabe, Samora Machel or Ibrahim Traore.

    This ritual of inviting foreign leaders to the Oval office like King Hussein of Jordan (who literally had to bow and lick Trumps posterior), President Vlodomer Zelensky of Ukraine (who was insulted, rubbished, humiliated and finally thrown out) and now Cyril Ramaphosa (who was forced to watch an embarrassing scene about his country on television) and belittling and denigrating them must stop.

    The humiliation of the South African President particularly was painful for me to watch because of the frightful history of his country and the terrible atrocities and apartheid system that the white Afrikaaner Boers subjected the black Africans to for hundreds of years.

    They went through all that and now they have to suffer this in the hands of yet another white man.

    This same white minority that oppressed and enslaved them in their own land for hundreds of years control 80% of the economy and own 90% of the land in their country today despite the fact that they only constitute 8% of the population.

    These are the people that Trump is claiming are being subjected to genocide and is offering asylum in America.

    These are people that in the main and in the past have regarded black Africans as being “no better than animals”.

    These are people that practised apartheid and that described black people  as the biblical “hewers of the wood and drawers of the water”.

    These are the people that once regarded a black man as being a quarter of a human being and that not only refused to have legal inter racial sex or marriages but compelled black people to live in shanty towns that were little better than concentration camps and subjected them to pass laws much in the same way as the Israelis are subjecting the Palestinians to such inhumanity and degradation today.

    If a Nigerian leader had been treated like this at the Oval office and I was in the room believe me all hell would have broken loose and Trump, his VP, his Ministers, his team and the American White House Press Corps would not only have got more than they dished out and bargained for but they would have been given a curt history lesson about the past and present atrocities of their nation and a thorough and precise lecture about the matter at hand.

    I am a Trump supporter but in all matters my nation and continent must come first.

    I despise the way he bullied Ramaphosa and I hope and pray that if he or any other foreign leader tries this with any Nigerian leader that I am in the room.

    The days of talking down to African Presidents are long over.

    More importantly the days of cowardly, weak, subservient, spineless, grovelling, corrupt, compromised and ignorant African lichspittles and quislings who call themselves leaders but who lack self-esteem, self-respect and pride in their people and who have no shame or dignity, who are hopelessly compromised, who have no knowledge of world affairs or world history, who are pawns of the neo-colonialists and imperialists and who have sold their soul and destiny of their nation to the western powers are long over.

    This fact can be confirmed by what can best be described as the “Traore spirit” that is blowing into all the nooks and corners of our continent today.

    As much as I love and support Trump his attitude and policy on Africa and Gaza leaves much to be desired.

    He needs to do better and he must understand that the Palestinians and the Africans, though facing challenges, are far more resilient than his people ever were and come from a far older and greater civilisation than his country ever did.

    We may not have their money and power but we have God.

    Their time is now, but tomorrow belongs to us. That God that put them up there and established their hegemony and empire shall remember us.

    We too shall rise and at that time all men shall say that the rejected stone has become the corner stone, that the Lord uses the foolish things of this world to confound the wisdom of the wise and that in truth all things are possible with God.

    • Chief Femi Fani-Kayode is the Sadaukin Shinkafi, the Wakilin Doka Potiskum, a former Minister of Aviation and a former Minister of Culture and Tourism.