Tag: Trump

  • Trump signs order to set up strategic bitcoin reserve

    Trump signs order to set up strategic bitcoin reserve

    US President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to establish a strategic bitcoin reserve, a day before meeting with executives from the cryptocurrency industry at the White House.

    The White House crypto czar, billionaire David Sacks, said in a post on X that the reserve will be capitalized with bitcoin owned by the federal government that was forfeited as part of criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings.

    Attendees at Friday’s White House crypto summit expect the event to serve as a stage for Trump to formally announce his plans to build a strategic reserve containing bitcoin and four other cryptocurrencies.

    Read Also: Reflections on Trump’s ambush on Zelenskyy

    Earlier this week, Trump announced the names of five digital assets he expects to include in this reserve, spiking the market value of each. The five are bitcoin, ether, XRP, Solana and Cardano, the president said.

    It is not clear how such a reserve would work or how it would benefit taxpayers. Sacks said the federal government will have a strategy to maximize the value of its holdings in such a reserve, without offering details.

    “The U.S. will not sell any bitcoin deposited into the Reserve. It will be kept as a store of value. The Reserve is like a digital Fort Knox for the cryptocurrency often called “digital gold,” Sacks said.

    However, Trump’s moves to support the crypto industry, which spent millions backing him and other Republicans in the November elections, have drawn concern from some conservatives and crypto backers over giveaways to an already wealthy community and delegitimizing the digital currency industry.

    Proponents argue that a reserve would help taxpayers benefit from crypto’s price growth.

  • Trump to Hamas: release all Israeli hostages or else…

    Trump to Hamas: release all Israeli hostages or else…

    US President Donald Trump has warned Hamas, demanding the immediate release of all hostages taken during the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, threatening dire consequences if they are not freed.

    Trump threatened that if Hamas does not obey his order he would be providing Israel with everything necessary to “finish the job,” warning that “not a single Hamas member will be safe”.

    Trump’s order follows shortly after the White House confirmed it was engaging in direct negotiations with Hamas regarding the hostages.

    Until now, Washington has steered clear of direct interaction with the group, adhering to a long-standing U.S. policy that prohibits contact with organisations designated as terrorist groups.

    Trump’s warning was contained in a statement he signed on Wednesday, March 05.

    The statement reads: “Shalom Hamas’ means Hello and Goodbye – You can choose. Release all of the Hostages now, not later, and immediately return all of the dead bodies of the people you murdered, or it is over for you. Only sick and twisted people keep bodies, and you are sick and twisted!

    “I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job, not a single Hamas member will be safe if you don’t do as I say.

    “I have just met with your former Hostages whose lives you have destroyed. This is your last warning! For the leadership, now is the time to leave Gaza, while you still have a chance.

    “Also, to the People of Gaza: A beautiful Future awaits, but not if you hold Hostages. If you do, you are dead! Make a smart decision. Release the hostages now or there will be hell to pay later!.”

    Last December, former President Trump issued a stern warning, vowing that “all hell would break loose” if hostages were not released by the time he assumed office.

    Read Also: Trump: Why Zelensky has no better path to a peace deal

    In his latest remarks, he reiterated his position on “rebuilding” Gaza, a statement that many interpreted as a veiled threat directed at the residents of the war-torn enclave.

    Currently, Israel reports that 59 hostages remain in Gaza, with 24 believed to still be alive. Among those held are U.S. citizens.

    The ceasefire brokered in January, which facilitated a swap of hostages between the two sides, now hangs in the balance. Hamas has stated that it will only release the remaining captives if Israel agrees to end its military operations.

  • Trump-Zelensky confrontation

    Trump-Zelensky confrontation

    Any student of diplomacy and foreign affairs will immediately recognise the genesis, development and trajectory of the demand for “open covenants openly negotiated” being a product of the First World War which leaders blamed on “secret diplomacy“. The total casualties of the conflict have been estimated at about40 million people, broken down to around 15 to 22 million deaths and about 23 wounded military personnel ranking it among the cruellest and deadliest conflicts in human history. This estimate perhaps did not take account of the casualties of colonial subjects like the famous “Senegalese tirailleurs” from France’s empire in West Africa and soldiers from British and German colonial empires who were drafted to fight in a conflict for which they knew nothing about the cause.

    The end of the war was also followed by the so-called Spanish influenza pandemic which killed between 50 to 100 million people worldwide between 1918 to 1919.

    To say that this tragedy was caused mainly by the events that followed the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir apparent to the Austro- Hungarian Empire by a Serbian nationalist in Croatia in Sarajevo in 1914 is simplistic. But it is true that if the Vienna regime did not have a secret treaty with the German Second Reich’s supporting it for any action it might take against Serbia, it would have been more restrained in its reaction. The moment the Serbian government was given an almost impossible ultimatum which it still complied with and the Vienna government mobilised against it militarily, Russia came into the picture on the side of Serbia as a protector of Slavic peoples and Germany responded by ordering military mobilisation and both France and Britain because of their secret treaty obligations to Russia, mobilised to support their ally Russia, thus the event in Sarajevo led to a world-wide conflagration.  It was therefore understandable for people to find out the fundamental cause of the war which was zeroed on “secret treaties”.

    Nigeria can earn $2.5billion annually from trades with Morocco – Abbas

    The democratic forces in Europe, led by the centre for democratic control of foreign policy in Britain, and by the European socialists, following the overthrow of the Kaiser in Berlin, and the emergence of the new Bolshevik government in Russia, following the overthrow of the Czarist regime in Saint Petersburg, supported the idea of secret treaties being responsible for the war. Governments all over Europe published official national documents blaming the pre-1914 governments for the failure of diplomacy in Europe. This apparently was picked up by the American government of President Woodrow Wilson who made the abolition of secret deals as means of conducting foreign policy the core of his foreign policy and guiding principle of the League of Nations, the precursor of the United Nations.

    Since then, foreign policy experts have laboured to keep sensitive information away from the public but the American penchant for exhibitionism has always prevailed to the chagrin of the whole world which the whole world saw in the fracas just short of blows between the American president, Donald J. Trump, aided by his vice president, JD Vance and president   Volodymyr Oleksanddrovych  Zelenskyy of beleaguered Ukraine in the White House last Friday, February 28. Despite embracing “open covenants” as a new way of conducting foreign policy, the Second World War still broke out in 1939 because of the onerous diktat of the Versailles peace settlement of 1918-1919 which ignored genuine and fundamental reasons for the First World War.

    It is arguable whether the settlement of 1945, based on total defeat of Germany and Japan and a world peace imposed by the United States and Russian hegemony would endure in the face of rising powers of China, India, Germany and Japan and other countries not happy with the current situation.

    What seems to be happening is that the Trump regime as disruptors has apparently decided to abandon the long-term American policy of hemming in Russia by building allies around it in Eastern and South-eastern Europe as well as in the NATO expansion to the Baltic states. Ukraine and Georgia’s membership of NATO would have made it possible to surround Russia with NATO short range ABM missiles. In the abandonment of this policy, Ukraine has become expendable. This is why for a whole week, Trump and his vice president, JD Vance, had openly lambasted Zelenskyy as an illegitimate president running an expired term in office since his government had postponed elections because of the exigencies of war in his country which is understandable.

    In fact Trump had blamed him for starting the Russian-Ukrainian war thus turning the victim into the aggressor. Trump went on to call him a dictator to the embarrassment of even some members of his Republican Party, rather than calling Vladimir Putin a dictator. He had publicly said Ukraine must be ready to cede Russian-conquered territories to it and that Ukraine should not expect to join NATO. Then the American president without any facts said his country had spent $350 billion in military supplies to Ukraine since 2014 which is way larger than the about $150 billion internationally verifiable figure. For this huge amount, Trump openly began sending emissaries to Ukraine asking its government to cede mineral rights worth about $500 billion to the American government in an open, imperialistic fashion totally unhidden from the rest of the world and different from such old tactics  in which the policy would have been presented as helping a nascent democratic country.

    This not only caused embarrassment to American allies but to many Americans themselves. To smoothen the way of Zelenskyy‘s visit to the White House, President Emmanuel Macron of France went to genuflect before Trump and to humour him to support Ukraine. This was followed by the visit of the British prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer to say that Trump must not give in to all Putin’s demands or else there will be nothing to negotiate. So when Zelenskyy came, no one was expecting the blow-up that followed. For reminding the American president that President Putin didn’t keep his words in the past, Trump exploded, joined by the American vice president that Zelenskyy was not grateful to President Trump for wanting to stop the bleeding of his country to which Zelenskyy replied he had expressed his gratitude many times at least to the American people and their government. Zelenskyy should have kept quiet but he refused to do so as a leader of a country at war. If this had happened in a normal diplomatic setting outside the glare of the world, it would not have assumed the total breakdown between the American peacemaker Trump and the struggling Ukrainian government and its weak European supporters that it now has assumed. 

    It is remarkable that the American president does not want to hear about the fears of Zelenskyy, the president of the Ukraine and even that of Europe on behalf of which he will be presumably negotiating. In a normal situation, Ukraine should be at the negotiating table and so should the Europeans, but Trump considers them as irritants. Unfortunately, Trump is right to say it is only him as a major backer of Ukraine who can bring Putin to the negotiating table, not the crowd of weak European states and that he has the understanding of the Russian government that it will abide with agreements negotiated with him and he had told Putin that Russia has much  to gain from an honourable peace in Ukraine especially from lifting of American and western economic sanctions and opening up of American investment in Russia itself and lessening of global tensions as a result of peace between Ukraine and Russia. He said he can only achieve rapprochement with Russia with overt friendship and not antagonism to President Putin. 

    He is right that without an all-out war on the European continent, his approach seems to be the only viable option for now. This is however very sad especially the way Ukraine is being made to part on one hand with 20% of its territory to Russia and substantial amount of its mineral wealth to America, supposedly a supporter. This should teach the whole world that the days of global consensus are gone and we have arrived at a period of open rape of weaker countries by the stronger ones and that the idea of sacrosanct and inviolable international borders based on the principle of territorial integrity is gone for ever.

  • Trump: Why Zelensky has no better path to a peace deal

    Trump: Why Zelensky has no better path to a peace deal

    • By Lekan Olayiwola

    The Oval Office grandstanding between presidents Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy was an unfortunate punctuation in the Russia-Ukraine peace process. The question on the mind of many who have been following the three-year long conflict is why is Trump taking this contrarian approach?

    Many would argue that Russia is the aggressor waging an unjust war, and Ukraine is the hapless victim that deserves all the support it could get from the international community especially the European Union (EU) and the United States (US).

    In what has become a cataclysmic war of attrition, the critical question to ask is: what is the path to peace? Surely, the Ukrainians would cling to their independence and right to self-determination to the death of the last man or so it seems.  The Russians on their own part are prepared to drag the war on for as long as possible with China and North Korea as willing allies.

    It’s easy for Zelenskyy to continue stoking the embers of war against Russia as long as the bill is picked up by the US-EU coalition.

    But Trump feels the US cannot continue to carry the burden of a never-ending conflict that has no terminal date. His calculation is probably that winning a nuclear-ready power like Russia is a pipe dream. If the US pulls out its majority support in finance and weaponry, the EU (assuming it could continue to shoulder the burden – highly unlikely) could make mistakes as they have done in the past which resulted in the last two World Wars.

    Zelenskyy, the European Union and much of rest of the world believe that justice is on the side of Ukraine and more existentially, winning the war against Russia is necessary for the salvation of the whole of Europe and the preservation of democratic principles worldwide. However, what many who think the path to peace is to roundly defeat Russia have not seriously considered is the extent to which Putin is willing to go to achieve his own objectives or denying Zelenskyy his. Meanwhile, city after city, village after village inside Ukrainian territory continue to burn and the casualty tolls continue on its steep climb year on year.

    If the ballooning cost in Ukrainian (and Russian) lives, including financial and material resources does not and is not likely to pave the way to peace, what other path is there to follow? Clearly Ukraine is the underdog in this conflict and the only reason Zelenskyy has been able to hold out this long is his ability to widen the scope of the conflict to involve other world powers in the Eurozone and the United States. As things stands, it is Putin, rather than Zelenskyy who holds the lever of peace. The only leverage Zelenskyy has is the continued support of the EU and the US. But he seems to have lost sight of that key factor when he confronted the current leader of his major ally in this war in Washington recently.

    Read Also: Nigeria can earn $2.5billion annually from trades with Morocco – Abbas

    If a powerful supporter says his priority has shifted and he cannot continue to help you, what do you do? Guilt-trip him or shame him into submission to continue to help you against his wish? The path to peace in a situation where the balance of power is clearly on the side of Russia (Ukraine is only propped by NATO members) is some form of appeasement. If the stronger party is not backing down, you have to concede something to him unless you are prepared to burn the whole house down. It is this appeasement approach that Trump’s critics interpret as a misplaced support for Putin. What was he supposed to do as a negotiator? (Forget about the economic quid pro quo part of the deal because that is just to defray United States financial outlay in the war so far).

    How do you reconcile a Trump who is not interested in continuation of the war which he kept saying should never have happened in the first place with a Putin who is hell bent on achieving his objective of keeping NATO out of Ukraine and protecting his irredentist countrymen in parts of Ukraine close to Russia? Zelenskyy should have read between the lines and seen that with Biden-Harris out of the White House, its game over! This is the stuff that realism in international relations is made of. Now, it is no longer about justice. It’s about powerful interests. And if a weaker party insists on rights, they only get hurt further.

    In this ongoing conflict, there is no justice unless it can be obtained with the force of arms which clearly is outside of Zelenskyy’s field of vision or scope of operation for now. All he could hope for is some compromise in his favour and that of the Ukrainian citizens. Rudely demanding “security guarantee” from Trump or anyone else shows that he still has illusions about his own importance, supposing that he has sufficient bargaining power. Apparently, he does not. At least, not with a Trump White House.

    Well, the Ukrainian president may choose to ignore Trump and his team and let the EU carry on with the bleeding of resources while he exposes more Ukrainian lives to their needless deaths. Of course, one could come to a painful acceptance that in the pursuit of peace, justice which is an essential ingredient may not always be complete. What is meant by this? Sometimes, we have to concede justice to procure peace , however unsatisfactory that may sound or look. Insisting on absolute justice in a realist world order amounts to chasing the wind. This is even more so where one is contending against an opponent that is more powerful.

    Where does this leaves Ukraine then? Doesn’t following Trump’s path to peace mean that Zelenskyy entered a war that was doomed to be lost from the outset – a war that he should never have entered in the first place? That is exactly what Trump has said emphatically and is now prepared to let Zelenskyy realize its real consequence. Perhaps, if Zelenskyy and his European backers had looked farther over the horizon, they might have seen Trump looming large. Or did they conclude that Biden or Harris would return to help them finish what they had started?

    In a nutshell, Trump is not interested in saving Zelenskyy from the consequences of choosing to defend against a war he could not win; a war that should not have started in the first place. Now that it has happened, sorry, the war has just got to be stopped anyway, however terrible it feels for the Ukrainian or European or even a global sense of justice. The alternative, Trump believes, is World War III which he is not interested in.

    It is painful, but where power relationship is concerned, it is better to seek terms of peace with the one who holds the ace – Russia in this case. That sounds like one is in support of an aggressor or dictator like Putin. Those who think like this are probably not facing reality. Diplomacy ought to have been employed ab initio. Ironically, every war eventually ends on the negotiating table. Why not prevent it there?

    As things stand, president Zelenskyy and all his supporters may have to outwait President Trump for another four years if they consider the latter’s position to be foolish. But where does that leave the people of Ukraine who are already suffering too much? Can the EU be counted upon to sustain the financial and material burden of the war without any help from the United States for that long?

    •Olayiwola is a peace and conflict researcher and practitioner and can be reached via lekanolayiwola@gmail.com

  • U.S. govt shutdown looms as Trump tries to assert new spending powers

    U.S. govt shutdown looms as Trump tries to assert new spending powers

    Congress has less than two weeks to extend federal spending laws and keep the government open, but now a clash over President Donald Trump’s attempt to seize powers the Constitution delegates to lawmakers threatens to stall talks and force a shutdown.

    Republican negotiators walked away from talks over the weekend to reach a deal on a top-line number on how much the federal government should spend for the rest of the 2025 fiscal year, which runs through Sept. 30. Democrats had said that number is irrelevant if Trump refuses to spend the money in accordance with the law — or if he empowers billionaire Elon Musk and his U.S. DOGE Service to terminate federal contracts and lay off tens of thousands of federal workers without regard to Congress’s wishes.

    Trump and advisers including budget chief Russell Vought have argued that the president has the power to withhold money that Congress orders spent, arguing that a post-Watergate law that limits that power is unconstitutional. Musk’s DOGE team has been unilaterally terminating contracts and pushing to shed federal staff.

    Read Also: Tinubu’s administration not skewing road projects to South — Umahi

    Now Democrats say they want assurances from congressional Republicans and the White House that the administration will actually spend the money included in any new law preventing a shutdown.

    The current funding law expires after March 14.

     “Money is just being pilfered. They’re stealing funds that are supposed to go to American families and businesses,” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Connecticut), House Democrats’ chief negotiator. “If we’re going to go through the agreement and get the topline and hammer it all out and someone comes along and upends it, that’s what we want to try to avoid.”

    Trump and Musk say their cuts are aimed at rooting out waste. Congressional Republicans are broadly happy to back the administration’s position. Trump will address a joint session of Congress Tuesday night.

  • Trump slams Zelenskyy for saying end of Russia war not in sight

    Trump slams Zelenskyy for saying end of Russia war not in sight

    United States (U.S.) President Donald Trump has criticised Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for saying that the end of Russia’s war in Ukraine is still “very, very far away.”

    “This is the worst statement that could have been made by Zelenskyy, and America will not put up with it for much longer,” Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social.

    Trump reiterated that he is convinced the Ukrainian leader does not want peace as long as the U.S. is backing Kyiv. He added that Europe “stated flatly that they cannot do the job without the U.S.,” which he said is not “a great statement to have made in terms of a show of strength against Russia.”

    Read Also: Tax Reform: All views will be considered, Speaker Abbas assures Nigerians

    It comes days after the internationally televised spat at the White House, where Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated the Ukrainian leader for being “disrespectful” and not sufficiently thankful for the support Kyiv has received from Washington.

    Trump also accused Zelenskyy of rejecting peace. Following the meeting at the Oval Office, Trump hinted at a potential Washington disengagement from Kyiv until they are willing to pursue a peace deal.

    “He’s got to say ‘I want to make peace’,” Trump responded to a reporter asking him about what Zelenskyy needs to do to restart talks with the US on Friday.

    On Sunday, Zelenskyy said he believes the dispute did not have to have an impact on the ties between the two nations as they have “a strong enough partnership.”

  • 201 Nigerians head for home on Trump deportation order

    201 Nigerians head for home on Trump deportation order

    • Convicts among first batch of 85 on way to Lagos
    • Envoy: Drop Box Policy not suspended

    No fewer than 201 Nigerians are in the immigration camps set to be deported home from the United States (U.S.) in line with President Donald Trump’s immigration policy.

    Eighty-five of them have been cleared for immediate eviction from the country.

    According to the U.S. Ambassador to Nigeria Richard Mills Jr., among the first batch of deportees are those serving jail terms in U.S. prisons.

    The envoy said the deportees would be taken to Lagos but did not indicate when.

    He spoke during a meeting with the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Mrs Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, at her office.

    The U.S. President has been fulfilling his campaign promise to deport illegal immigrants.

    He has deported citizens of countries such as Colombia, Mexico and India, among others as he aggressively pursues his policy of getting out undocumented immigrants.

    According to a statement by Mrs Odumegwu-Ojukwu’s media aide Magnus Eze, the envoy said: “Those to be repatriated would be dropped in Lagos.

    “There wouldn’t be room for whether it should be in Port Harcourt or Abuja.

    “The first group will be convicted prisoners – those who committed crimes and are in U.S. prisons.

    “Some of them are those who have clearly violated U.S. immigration laws.

    “They appealed but were denied yet they are still in the U.S. They have committed immigration crime.”

    The minister pleaded for dignified treatment for Nigerians to be deported.

    This is in view of the fact that many of those convicts being deported from the U.S. are manacled – with handcuffs on their hands and legs.

    Mrs Odumegwu-Ojukwu insisted that the U.S. government must follow the laid down conventions on the deportation of persons in repatriating immigrants.

    The minister urged the U.S. to find a way of ameliorating the trauma of those to be deported, including allowing them ample opportunity to retrieve their assets in America.

    Mrs Odumegwu-Ojukwu bemoaned the emotional and financial pains that many Nigerians in the U.S. were already experiencing since the Trump Administration announced the plans.

    She stated that the effect was far-reaching even to the hinterlands of Nigeria where for instance, several families, including children relied on remittances from the U.S. for their survival and education.

    Mrs Odumegwu-Ojukwu said: “With the new administration in the U.S., we want a situation where there will be commitments.

    “If there will be repatriation, we want a dignified return.

    “At the moment, we’re told that about 201 Nigerian nationals are in U.S. immigration camps and about 85 have been cleared for deportation.

    “Will there be any way of ameliorating their pains?

    “This has been of great concern to not just Nigerian nationals in the U.S. but family members in Nigeria who depend on them for survival, children whose school fees are paid for by these Diasporans.

    “We are asking as a country whether they will be given ample time to handle their assets or will they just be bundled into planes and repatriated?

    “It will really be traumatic, especially for those who have not committed any violent crime”.

    The U.S. envoy also spoke on the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).

    “I think this (Trump) Administration will concentrate more on trade and commerce.

    “This relationship is strong and we want it sustained,” he said.

    Mrs Odumegwu-Ojukwu expressed concern over the likely suspension of the Drop Box Visa System by the U.S. government.

    The minister urged Washington DC to reconsider the suspension of the policy such that Nigerians who had been travelling to the US for genuine reasons would not have to suffer unduly in procuring U.S. visa.

    She urged the U.S. government to issue a statement clarifying its actual position on the Drop Box system to assuage the concerns of anxious Nigerians.

    The minister said that about 14,000 Nigerians are students in the U.S., with parents living in Nigeria.

    These parents, she said, were worried whether there would be any change in student policy by the new U.S. administration.

    Expressing concern over the future of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Mrs. Odumegwu-Ojukwu said: “We can’t say whether it’s outright suspension. A lot of NGOs are worried and waiting for clarification.

    “We will just make that appeal on behalf of the NGOs in Nigeria.

    “Even less than a month into the 90-day review, there have been concerns.

    “I know before the completion of the review, there’s already humanitarian issues in Nigeria and Africa.

    “We will appeal that this initiative be preserved.

    Read Also: An Open Letter To Donald Trump

    “Even if it’s abrogated as an agency, there must be a way of keeping the ideals to ensure that the poor beneficiaries in the communities, not just in Nigeria but Africa, are not abandoned.”

    The minister further called for the injection of more impetus in the bilateral relations between Abuja and Washington DC.

    Noting that Nigeria and the US had not done well in the area of trade, especially post-COVID-19, she called for investments in the mining sector. According to her, diversification of investments would boost exports to the U.S.

    The minister called for the reactivation of the ‘Silent Secretariat’ where the two countries assessed their bilateral relations.

    She explained that the foreign policy of the President Bola Ahmed Tinubu-led administration, which focuses on democracy, development, demography and diaspora (4-Ds) was on course.

    She restated the government’s commitment to citizen diplomacy.

    She said: “One other area is not just diaspora but diplomacy, people-to-people contacts.

    “So, the issue of illegal migration is there but the current administration is determined about citizen diplomacy.

    “We want to know how our people in the diaspora are doing.

    “We have some of them in prisons abroad. The administration is concerned about their welfare.”

    She said that Nigeria needed strategic partnerships to tackle the demographic issue of unemployment which triggers illegal migration known as Japa syndrome in Nigerian parlance.

    She said it was in line with the 4-Ds foreign policy of Nigeria that despite the Sahel crisis, the free movement policy of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) was still in place.

    “ECOWAS has been at its best, so, one has to appreciate that even with the exit of these states, free movement within the region is still there.

    “The immigration has not closed the borders,” the minister said.

    The U.S. envoy said he looked forward that the bilateral relations between both countries will get quite broader.

    Drop Box Policy not suspended

    According to Mills, the Drop Box Visa Policy had not been suspended.

    The envoy explained: “Whenever there is a change in administration, policies are renewed.”

    He assured that the position of the new US Government on the USAID, Drop Box Visa system and others, would be known in due course.

    He acknowledged that the USAID did some specific things, particularly life-saving in the health sector, and humanitarian issues like mother-child.

    “Some of these NGOs are feeling the pains, but the situation is being reviewed,” Mills said.

    The envoy expressed concerns over democracy in Africa, noting the exit of three Sahel states from ECOWAS as well as the challenge of counter-terrorism.

  • The Trump and immigrants deportation

    The Trump and immigrants deportation

    In his second term, President Donald Trump has aggressively pursued mass deportation policies, echoing his longstanding commitment to stringent immigration enforcement.

    Within the first month of his return to office, the administration has executed a series of executive orders and operations aimed at expelling undocumented immigrants from the United States. These directives expanded the categories of undocumented individuals prioritised for removal, effectively broadening the scope to include those without criminal records.

     The administration’s approach has been marked by high-profile Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in major cities such as Atlanta, Boston, Denver, Miami, New York City, Newark, Philadelphia, Seattle, and Washington, D.C.

    The administration has reported a significant increase in deportation activities. Between January 20 and February 10, 2025, ICE arrested over 8,200 individuals, tripling the daily average compared to the previous administration’s final year.

    Additionally, the number of migrants in Border Patrol custody has declined by over 500%, with daily encounters dropping from approximately 8,000 during the prior administration to just 303 in recent weeks.

    The administration’s deportation methods have sparked international controversy, particularly concerning the treatment of deportees. Footage shared on social media by the U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) showed deportees being transported in chains, a practice that has drawn condemnation from both domestic and international observers.

    In one notable incident, Colombian President, Gustavo Petro initially barred U.S. military planes carrying deported Colombian nationals from landing, demanding that deportees be treated with dignity and transported on civilian aircraft. The standoff escalated, with President Trump threatening tariffs and visa restrictions. Ultimately, U.S. officials agreed to modify certain practices, and Colombia consented to accept the flights.

    Read Also: Foreign aid: Trump’s return and Nigeria’s future    

    Similarly, outrage erupted in India following reports of deported Indian nationals being shackled during transport. The issue gained prominence during a visit by Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi to the U.S, leading to widespread condemnation and calls for more humane treatment of deportees.

     The intensified deportation policies have had profound effects on immigrant communities and local economies. Fear of deportation has led many immigrants, including those with legal status, to avoid public spaces, resulting in decreased consumer spending in areas with significant immigrant populations.

     Small businesses, particularly in Latino communities, have reported substantial declines in sales as patrons stay home to avoid potential ICE encounters.

    Moreover, the abrupt removal of a large segment of the workforce poses challenges to industries reliant on immigrant labor, such as agriculture and construction.

    The American Immigration Council estimates that a mass deportation operation could cost at least $315 billion and exacerbate labor shortages in critical sectors.

  • Africa and the Trump challenge

    Africa and the Trump challenge

    SIR: United States President Donald Trump has, true to his campaign promise, been implementing radical policies that continue to stir mixed reactions globally. Through his executive orders, he has deported many undocumented immigrants, levied import tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China. He has also announced his country’s withdrawal from the World Health Organisation (WHO), the scrapping of USAID, an agency that intervenes in health programmes like HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and Malaria particularly in developing countries including Nigeria.

    These draconian policies have sparked fears and condemnation.

    Although President Trump can claim to be fulfilling his campaign promises to the American people, we can only hope that he re-evaluate some of the policies.

    For instance, the new tariff imposed on good and services will have catastrophic effects on the global economy and thus induce a backlash. The increase in tariff will lead to inflation and push more countries into recession.

    Though he has appealed to Americans to be patient as the new tariff is for the collective good of the country, the move will do more harm than good to international trade.

    His decision to cut off aid to African countries has also come like a thunderstorm. African countries have enjoyed the grant from US for decades. The aids which amount to billions of dollars are meant to combat poverty and disease. However, these funds have, more often than not, been corruptly embezzled by African leaders with little or nothing to show for it.

    With African countries among the worst hit by Trump policies, health education and other programmes that require emergency funding are likely to be affected. However, the countries can mitigate the effects by diversifying their funding sources and exploring alternative partnerships. For instance, the countries can seek funding from other countries, international organisations and private investors.

    Read Also: Trump should be a wake-up call!

    Besides, there is the need to strengthen regional partnerships. Regional economic communities like the African Union, ECOWAS, and SADC can provide a platform for African countries to share resources, expertise, and risk. African countries can focus on increasing domestic revenue through taxation, improving tax administration, and leveraging natural resources.

    Moreover, the countries can explore partnerships with other countries in the Global South, such as China, India, and Brazil, all of which can provide alternative funding and technical assistance. They should also prioritize investment in critical minerals, after all, many African countries are rich in critical minerals like crude oil, cobalt, lithium, and nickel etc. and so can leverage on these resources to negotiate better trade and investment deals with the US and other countries. By adopting these strategies, they countries can reduce their vulnerability to aid stoppages and promote sustainable economic development.

    • Ibrahim Mustapha,

    Pambegua, Kaduna State.

  • Trump should be a wake-up call!

    Trump should be a wake-up call!

    President Donald Trump of the United States of America is a creation of time. The key point is not in changing America. Instead, Trump is revealing America as it is! The America that we knew – represented by F.D. Roosevelt, J.F. Kennedy and Jimmy Carter – was perhaps just a fleeting moment or a facade. Trump’s presidency has exposed the underlying realities of the country, making it clear that the perceived America was not entirely genuine.

    Trump epitomizes the body and the spirit of the White conquest of Native Americans, which is reflected in his immigration policy. On the surface, his policy aims to eliminate illegal immigrants, criminal gangs and narcotics dealers. However, in reality, Trump, as POTUS, and his supporters are pursuing a Whites-only immigration agenda, similar to the one once employed by Australia, which has now been discarded. The response to South Africa’s land reforms is clearly in this direction.

    Trump’s offer to allow White South Africans to immigrate to the US as refugees is disquieting, especially since this opportunity wasn’t extended to Palestinians or other groups. But then, this move isn’t surprising, given the long-standing discussions in the US about repopulating sparsely populated states like Wyoming, Montana and Idaho. The president seems to view this as a chance to appeal to those who fear losing their demographic majority.

    Not everything is wrong with Trump! For instance, his administration’s cost-effective unit aimed at reducing waste and inefficiency in government aligns with the recommendations of Nigeria’s Oronsaye Report, which was submitted in 2012. It’s ironic that Trump is implementing reforms that Nigeria should have undertaken years ago. This highlights Nigeria’s slow pace in addressing its own inefficiencies. Importantly, while Trump’s policies, such as dismantling USAID and the Department of Education, are not entirely commendable, his focus on cost-efficient units could serve as a catalyst for Nigeria to revisit and implement the Oronsaye Report’s recommendations.

    Similarly, Nigeria seems to expect the US, under Trump’s leadership, to take responsibility for recovering its stolen wealth. However, if the US Department of Justice is no longer pursuing cases against individuals who have looted Nigeria’s treasury and stashed the funds in the US, it raises questions about Nigeria’s own role in addressing corruption. Ultimately, the issue reveals the shape and size of a deeper problem: why does Nigeria have such weak institutions that billions of dollars can be easily embezzled and laundered abroad?

    So, Trump’s actions should be a wake-up call for us to “padlock the stable doors” to prevent the horse from bolting. It’ll be in our interest not to allow other countries to capture the horse which has fled because we refused to padlock the stable doors. Padlocking the stable doors should have involved setting up a congressional budget office to monitor and police a budget process since 1999. That this was not done and it’s not about to be done shows a complete and utter lack of seriousness in our curbing waste and corruption.

    Read Also: First Lady calls for sustainable health financing in Africa

    In addition, the refusal to use a performance planning budgeting system, first proposed by the late Omowale Kuye as the Director General of Budget in 1983, reveals a lackadaisical attitude towards budget and project management and implementation. So, no one can, or should, hold Trump responsible for Nigeria’s ineptitude.

    Trump and his supporters had a clear agenda, Project 2025, which became public knowledge before his presidential nomination. Since his tariff policies would likely have far-reaching effects on Nigeria, Nigeria should have prepared countermeasures in case he won, but did we? Were we fully prepared for the impact of his presidency? Canada was well-prepared, and swiftly responded to Trump’s policies. In contrast, Nigeria’s history shows it was once adept at preparing for economic challenges, such as the 1967 devaluation of the British pound sterling. But not anymore!

    Again, the question remains, where did we lose the plot and what’s next for Nigeria? Now, Nigeria faces brain drain, with doctors leaving the country daily. Was that also caused by Trump? Ours isn’t just a matter of sensible or senseless governance; it’s a result of successive governments failing to effectively communicate with the people. They’ve either used the wrong channels or struggled to convey their message, leaving a gaping hole in their connection with the electorate. Consequently, governments are often caught off guard, scrambling to respond to issues that could have been addressed through proper communication.

    The prosperity of the developed world was built on the exploitation and suffering of Black slaves. Unfortunately, the legacy of colonialism and slavery continues to haunt us, with the scars of pillage, human trafficking and forced labour still evident. Iconic symbols of power, such as the White House, were constructed on the backs of enslaved Africans. Similarly, the Arab world’s economy flourished thanks to Mansa Musa’s wealth and the trans-Saharan trade. Yet, despite these historical contributions, the Black world remains economically and socially shackled. 

    The Bible and Koran, scriptures that advocate for compassion, justice and humility, now serve as a stark contrast to the hypocrisy of their proponents. Colonial powers, who claimed to represent Christianity, exploited our resources, enslaved our people, and treated them as commodities rather than human beings.

    As we reflect on Nigeria’s economic challenges, it is essential to consider the importance of informed leadership. The story of the Pharaoh “which knew not Joseph” serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of ignorance and the importance of informed leadership. As if two wrongs have equaled a right, the actions of Pharaoh and Trump share a common thread – both leaders sought to maintain power and control over perceived threats. Pharaoh viewed the Israelites as a danger to his authority, while Trump has portrayed undocumented immigrants as a threat to national security and American jobs.

    Ancient civilizations also offer valuable lessons in leadership. In Greece, for instance, Oedipus Rex serves as a moral lesson about the dangers of hubris and ignorance. Likewise, India’s Mahabharata tells the story of the blind king, Dhritarashtra, who ignored wise counsel and led his kingdom to ruin. China’s concept of ‘Mandate of Heaven’ emphasizes the importance of morally just leadership. Conversely, Africa’s ‘Ubuntu’ philosophy prioritizes community and interconnectedness. It highlights the need for leaders to consider the well-being of all people, not just their own constituents. This concept is often cited as a counterpoint to Trump’s ‘America First’ ideology.

    Now that Trump has declared war on everybody, it might be a unique opportunity for Nigeria to take control of our economic destiny and build an economy based on self-reliance and the search for export-oriented, value-added policies in order to balance its books, end the perennial current accounts deficits and smash the mould of boom-to-bust cycles. Even as he continues to defy conventions and push the boundaries of executive power, dear country should learn from its history and leverage the population dynamics of countries like the United States and India to create a more sustainable and resilient economy.

    The Chinese ideograph for CRISIS is, on one side, Danger, and, on the other side, Opportunity. Essentially therefore, Trump’s second coming presents a fantastic opportunity for Nigerians. We should seize it with both hands. We shouldn’t ask other countries to do for us what we are expected to do for ourselves. In a word, failure to have a coherent response to Trump’s ‘wahala’ only means that Nigeria will continue to move, irresistibly, in the direction of boom-to-bust, underperformance and underachievement, with more Nigerians sliding into poverty. And that will be sad!

    May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!