Tag: Trump

  • Is Trump coming?

    Is Trump coming?

    The United States’ economy is picking up under President Joe Biden. Unfortunately, the effect of the robust state of the economy in America’s election appears not serious. Or, what explanation can exist for Biden trailing behind his predecessor, Donald Trump, in the race for the White House? Since last October, Biden has trailed Trump in polls. Now, in the heat of the primaries and caucuses, things still look tight for Biden.

    What is certain for now is that Biden is the only one who can deny himself the Democratic Party’s ticket for the November election, and it is certain that the Republican Party ticket is already in for Trump. Many of those who earlier showed interest in the party’s ticket have pulled out of the race. Not just that they pulled out, they declared support for Trump and are going all out to champion his cause.

    Despite all the legal hurdles, these guys seem set to ensure another Biden/Trump battle. Trump faces over 90 criminal charges. The legal quagmire means nothing to North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum. Last December, Burgum ended his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination and endorsed Trump in January. This was after six months of campaigning with a promise to lower inflation, push America to be energy independent and secure its southern border.

    Like Burgum, ex-New Jersey Governor Chris Christie also pulled out from the race. He did in January, a few days before the Iowa caucuses and backed Trump.

    Another hopeful who dropped out in January is Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. He endorsed Trump, thus entrusting him with his quest to “reverse the decline” in America.

    Trump also has the support of Conservative talk radio host Larry Elder who ended his quest for the presidential nomination in October 2023. He was running on the promise to secure the border and combat criticism that the United States is systemically racist. He also sought to counter what he described as “epidemic of fatherlessness”.

    Others who have run out of the race are Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson, Michigan businessman Perry Johnson, ex-Vice President Mike Pence, Tech entrepreneur and author Vivek Ramaswamy, South Carolina Senator Tim Scott, Miami Mayor Francis Suarez and ex-Texas Representative Hurd.

    Hurd didn’t endorse Trump. Known for his scathing attack on the former president, he pitched his tent with former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, a challenger for the Republican presidential nomination. Inflation, China’s global influence, artificial intelligence and children’s low scores in math, science and reading were his key campaign talking points. Now, he is hoping Haley will thrash Trump and get the nomination.

    Pence, who also dropped out of the race, once said Trump “should never” be president again because of the aftermath of the 2020 election. He was Trump’s deputy when the former president tried to undo Biden’s victory. Trump quickly re-christened him a weakling for not working against the greater good.

    With a Trump candidacy imminent, can Biden defeat him a second time? Or, are we set for another four years of Trump. His first four years were more troublemaking and less troubleshooting. He made troubles with almost everyone. His friends were white supremacists and those who benefitted from his policies. African-Americans felt left at the back. Europe didn’t get along with him. He treated Africa as a shit hole and dealt with the Chinese like lepers. Immigrants were objects of misgiving and mimicry. Mexicans were treated with disdain and he began walling them off. He also separated children from their mothers in an inhuman immigration policy. 

    In those four years, the rule was: Cross Trump and get tongue-lashed. Reporters had their fill. News conferences were avenues for the immediate past president to thrash the media for a perceived wrong. CNN, to him, meant fake news. New York Times, Washington Post, and others were despicable. Even Fox News that started as an ally ended as a traitor. For Trump, there were no permanent friends. The only thing that was permanent was his interests and once you were against his interests, you automatically switched camp and were dressed down in the worst language possible. Pence can testify.

    Trump also eroded core alliances such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, provoked traditional partners and pampered autocrats such as Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Never had America seen such an era, and it could take some time for such a mistake to be made again. Some say the mistake can never happen again. But, with democracy, never say never. Even ‘fools’ at times appeal to the majority and get the coveted crown.

    In a lot of ways, White supremacists had a field day. So free were they that they threatened fire if their man was not re-elected and taking over the Capitol was the height of their madness. They wanted the heads of Pence and Speaker Pelosi and others they considered traitors. They broke glasses and desecrated the hallowed chamber. Reports suggest that dozens of law enforcement officers, active-duty military members, and veterans participated in the global giant’s moment of shame. Now, the Capitol has a high wall and the National Guard is out to keep the dogs of war away.

    Read Also: Aiyedatiwa orders arrest of thugs destroying opponents’ billboards

    It will be unfair to write off the Trump years totally. He was not all bad news. He is credited with overhauling the U.S. judiciary, especially with the appointment of three Supreme Court justices and the fast-tracking of the appointment of more than 200 federal judges. He is also respected in some quarters for pushing through massive tax cuts for corporations, expanding the economy faster than it was under Barack Obama, and crashing unemployment to a record low— before the economic gains were washed away by the Coronavirus. He also normalised relations between Israel and four once-antagonistic Arab neighbours, and he condensed U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, but like a commentator noted all these were “dwarfed by what Trump got wrong”.

    My final take: From now till November, America is going to dominate global news. Except something unexpected happens, Trump and Biden will be the main characters in this book that America has just started writing and the twists and the turns will be unprecedented. Neither of them will have it easy.

  • Trump unveils ‘Never Surrender’ footwear

    Trump unveils ‘Never Surrender’ footwear

    Straight off the back of being ordered to pay more than $300 million in his high-profile fraud trial, Donald Trump has already embarked upon a new money-making scheme – selling trainers.

    The former president unveiled his new “Never Surrender” high-top shoes at SneakerCon in Philadelphia on Saturday.

    The golden shoes began with a hefty price tag of $399, but have already been resold for many times more online.

    The first “official” piece of Trump merchandise gels well with two of the former president’s favourite things – America, and himself.

    The bright gold high-top shoes are emblazoned with a large “T” on the side, with the U.S. flag stitched around the collar, providing “both style and comfort” and described as “perfect for any Trump supporter”.

    Customers are once again being offered to “be a part of history” by buying the shoes, with only 1000 pairs supposedly being made.

    Each pair is numbered and “at least 10 pairs” will be autographed by Trump, according to the website selling the shoes.

    “They’re for the go-getters who don’t know the word quit. With a standout gold finish and the ‘T’ badge, these kicks are for true Patriots,” a description reads.

    “Wrapped with an American flag on the collar, they shout out to the brave and the free. The Never Surrender sneakers are your rally cry in shoe form. Lace-up and step out ready to conquer.”

    Two other pairs of shoes are also available; a pair of white “POTUS” shoes, and another pair of red “T-Wave” shoes.

    The “Never Surrender” high tops have a hefty price tag of $399, but the shoes have already sparked fierce bidding wars online due to their exclusivity.

    Read Also: Trump not immune from election subversion charges, Us Court rules

    A quick eBay search yesterday showed a pair of the shoes going for just short of $5,000. One Maga supporter claimed to have paid $9,000 bidding on an autographed pair.

    The high tops are already sold out online, with further pre-orders available, according to the website.

    The two other pairs of shoes available online are both retailing for $199 on the website.

    The new website also sells other Trump-branded shoes and “Victory47” cologne and perfume for $99 a bottle.

    Despite the shoes and website espousing Trump-like rhetoric of the kind often seen on his campaign trail, the website claims to have no connection to “any political campaign”.

    The former president was met with loud boos as well as cheers at the Philadelphia Convention Center as he introduced the footwear.

    “There’s a lot of emotion in this room,” he said of the reaction, after holding up and showing off a pair of gold shoes, then placing one on each side of his podium.

    “This is something that I’ve been talking about for 12 years, 13 years. And I think it’s going to be a big success.”

    Trump campaign officials promoted the appearance in online posts.

  • Trump not immune from election subversion charges, Us Court rules

    Trump not immune from election subversion charges, Us Court rules

    A federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday that Donald Trump does not have immunity from charges that he plotted to overturn his 2020 election defeat, bringing the former U.S. president a step closer to an unprecedented criminal trial.

    A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected Trump’s claim that he cannot be prosecuted because the allegations relate to his official responsibilities as president.

    “We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter,” the unanimous panel wrote.

    The court concluded that any “executive immunity” that may have shielded Trump from criminal charges while he served as president “no longer protects him against this prosecution.”

    The ruling, which Trump is almost certain to appeal, rebuffs his attempt to avoid a trial on charges that he undermined American democracy and the transfer of power, even as he consolidates his position as the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination.

    Read Also: Trump hints at potential running mate

    The case will remain paused until at least Feb. 12 to give Trump time to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Trump’s lawyers argued that former presidents were entitled to sweeping legal protections and could not be criminally prosecuted for official actions unless first impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office by the Senate.

    Trump was impeached twice by the House, but each time Senate Republicans cast sufficient votes to acquit him of the charges.

    REUTERS

  • The Republican Party’s Transformation into the Party of Trump

    The Republican Party’s Transformation into the Party of Trump

    • By Milan Sime Martinic

    Trump’s grip on the Republican party is strong. The U.S. primaries are treating the world to a fast and captivating unfolding of metamorphosis of the Grand Old Party. The true American colors party of Ronald Reagan now reveals its contours brushed in the vivid hues of Trumpism, molding its identity with an indelible imprint as a reflection of Trump. It is no longer the party of Lincoln, Eisenhower, or Reagan. It is now clearly the party of Trump.

    In the recent Iowa caucuses, Donald Trump scored a landslide victory, winning over 50% of the vote and defeating his closest competitor, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, by a whopping 30 points. Trump won 98 out of 99 Iowa counties, displaying broad-based support across all demographics. The scale of Trump’s Iowa triumph exceeds any other presidential primary winner’s margin of victory in history.

    That was follow by another whopping victory up in the New Hampshire primary, where Trump beat former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley by over 20 points. These back-to-back blowout wins cement Trump’s position as the undisputed Republican leader. Despite myriad legal investigations and lawsuits facing Trump, his support within the GOP base remains virtually unshakeable.

    The results and the polls in the states yet to hold primaries are clear evidence that Trump has fundamentally transformed the Republican Party in his image. The traditional conservative principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, family values and morality seem to have been superseded by Trump’s hardline populist rhetoric and authoritarian governing style.

    Iowa was made famous by making it possible for dark horse candidates like Jimmy Carter in 1976 to be propelled by a win or strong showing to the nomination and the presidency. But in 2024, the caucuses showed that Republicans are not looking to replicate Trump, widely rejecting options of a “more polished” Trump (DeSantis), a nicer-sounding Trump (Haley), or even a Trumpier Trump (Ramaswamy).

    In these early contests, Trump performed an incredible alchemy molding most demographics to him rather than molding himself to gain their support. The Conservatives and Evangelicals particularly abandoned their values and beliefs for the Trump brand and lifestyle projection, neither of which squares with conservativism or religious values.

    Another surprising demographic where Trump increased his support is the “highly educated” sector, garnering more than 37 per cent support, up from 11 per cent eight years ago; but the real surprise was the growth in support across all demographics. More than 60 per cent of Evangelicals supported him, but 48 per cent of non-Evangelicals did, too. Trump’s support among Republicans is solid.

    DeSantis came in a distant second in the Iowa race with 21.2 per cent, and Haley a slightly more distant third with 19.1 per cent. Seeing the writing on the wall as polls showed large Trump support, both campaigns sought to portray a good placing in Iowa as a platform to propel the rest of their campaigns.

    A closer look, however, shows that, if anyone, Haley was better positioned to capitalize if Trump falters in New Hampshire, a state of weaker Trump support and where she enjoys the endorsement of Gov. Sununu, whose Republican lineage dates to his father as governor and White House Chief of Staff under President George H. W. Bush. That did not even get her within 20 points of Trump.

    DeSantis, on the other hand, was like the gambler with millions to play who spends all his money unwisely and then puts all his chips on one table. For him, that table was Iowa, he had virtually no structure in New Hampshire.

    On the day he dropped out of the race, anti-Trump candidate and former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie predicted that those who do not outright state that Trump is not fit to be president are bidding to become his vice-presidential running mate.

    DeSantis, who had been growing increasingly critical of Trump, dropped out before the New Hampshire primary and promptly endorsed Trump.

    But he is only part of the story. Marco Rubio, the Florida senator who received Nikki Haley’s endorsement in 2016, ignored her rising numbers and endorsed Trump. South Carolina Senator Tim Scott, who owes his position to Haley who appointed him to the upper house, has also vehemently endorsed Trump. Ramaswamy, who received 8 per cent of the vote in Iowa dropped out of the race and immediately threw his support to Trump.

    Iowa was an easy win for Trump. Results were clear early. It was no contest. Though it would be worthy of note that it was Mike Huckabee in 2008, it was Rick Santorum in 2012 and Ted Cruz in 2016, none of whom went on to win the nomination.

    But another takeaway from Iowa and New Hampshire is that Republican voters have bought the big lie.

    Two-thirds of those in the Iowa caucuses told pollsters they do not believe Biden won the 2020 election and that they see Biden as an illegitimate president. By a slightly larger number, Republicans say they would support Trump even if he is criminally convicted before the election.

    Let’s make it clear, they support the retribution-seeking candidate who would, in office, pardon himself, stop all criminal investigations against him, and use the justice system to persecute his opponents. That is not speculation, he has said as much.

    Indeed, the man who said in 2016 that he could shoot a man in the middle of Fifth Avenue and would not lose any voters proved wrong those who did not believe he was serious. He argued in court this month seeking presidential immunity for his past actions that a US president should be able to order a Navy SEAL team to kill his opponent and enjoy immunity. As outrageous as those sounds, the results show he did not lose any voters.

    When reports came out that when the mobs at the Capitol on January 6, 2020, were chanting “Hang Mike Pence”, and that Trump responded, “Well, maybe he deserves it”, Trump’s support remained unchanged.

    When Pence entered the 2024 race, he even said he would support Trump if he is the nominee, but Republicans had no use for the former vice-president when he is not fully on Trump’s team.

    In fact, whether it is a political or a legal threat against Trump, it triggers a fight-or-flight response among his supporters, with most of them choosing to rally around him and fight.

    Read Also: Trump hints at potential running mate

    There is still hope among the Haley camp that any of the 91 indictments Trump faces becoming actual convictions could change the game and put them on the road to nomination. That remains to be seen.

    Trump’s electability has been questioned before, arguing that he could not win in the general election. It happened to the detriment of his 16 Republican opponents in 2016 and, of course, Hillary Clinton.

    Except for Christie and Asa Hutchinson, both of whom only garnered single-digit support, all other Republicans seeking the nomination tiptoed around criticism of Trump in order not to offend his supporters or incur his wrath. Their complicity in the Trump takeover of the GOP is in the history books.

    Trump has transformed the party. It is now his party; you can cry if you want to.

  • Trump hints at potential running mate

    Trump hints at potential running mate

    Former United States President, Donald Trump has dramatically revealed he already knows who he will choose as his running mate if he is the Republican 2024 presidential nominee.

     The frontrunner for the Republican nomination was asked who his running mate would be during a Fox News town hall in Des Moines, Iowa, he said: “I can’t tell you that really, I mean, I know who it’s going to be.”

    He refused to name the person when the host, Martha MacCallum pushed him on their identity.

    MacCallum asked: “What about any of the people who you’ve run against? Would you be open to mending fences with any of them?”

    Trump responded: “Oh, sure. I will, I will,”

    He then joked that he could pick Chris Christie, who has been his most vocal critic among the other Republican candidates.

    “I’ve already started to like Christie better,” Trump said. “Christie for vice president?” MacCallum joked.

    “I don’t see it, I don’t see it,” Trump said. ‘That would be an upset. Christie for vice president. Ladies and Gentlemen, I’d like to announce …nah.”

    He had earlier joked about starting to like Christie again after a hot mic moment where he predicted Nikki Haley would get “smoked” moments before he took the stage to suspend his presidential campaign.

    Christie was one of Trump’s top finalists for his running mate in 2016, but he chose Mike Pence instead.

    This time the favorites include South Dakota governor, Kristi Noem, who is appearing as a Trump surrogate in Iowa, and Senator Tim Scott, whose own presidential bid flamed out.

    Read Also: Fed Govt alerts Nigerians to meningitis outbreak

    The former South Carolina governor, Nikki Haley, who is running against Trump for the presidential nomination, has not ruled out being his running mate, even while saying his return to the White House would bring ‘chaos.’

      However, some of Trump’s most prominent supporters have declared themselves against the idea of a Trump-Haley ticket.

      Trump campaign advisor, Chris LaCivita told reporters after Trump’s appearance that: “All I know is what I heard tonight and I’m not going to categorise it any other way than that.”

      Other names in the frame have included congresswomen Elise Stefanik and Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Ohio senator J.D. Vance. Stefanik parroted Trump’s rhetoric of referring to January 6 defendants as ‘hostages,’ signaling her distance from former Trump Vice President Mike Pence, who was the subject of execution threats that day.

      Trump also told the town hall he was not worried that Christie’s exit from the presidential race on Wednesday might boost Haley’s candidacy.

      “I’m not exactly worried about it,” Trump said. “I love the people. They love me, I think.’

  • US appeals court judges appear sceptical of Trump immunity claim

    US appeals court judges appear sceptical of Trump immunity claim

    A panel of US Appeals Court Judges appeared deeply skeptical of Donald Trump’s claim that as a former president, he should be immune from prosecution on charges that he conspired to overturn the 2020 United States election. 

    The 77-year-old Trump attended the appeals court hearing held under tight security in a federal courthouse yesterday just blocks away from the US Capitol stormed by his supporters on January 6, 2021. 

    Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, listened quietly to the slightly more than hour-long arguments before a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals.

     He later addressed reporters, warning of “bedlam” in the US if his prosecution goes ahead. 

    Trump, who was impeached twice by the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives while in office but acquitted both times by Republicans in the Senate, is scheduled to go on trial in Washington on March 4 on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election won by Democrats and current US President, Joe Biden. 

    Trump’s attorney, John Sauer, told the judges that a president can only be prosecuted for actions taken while in the White House if they have first been impeached and convicted by Congress.

     “To authorise the prosecution of a president for his official acts would open Pandora’s box from which this nation may never recover,” Sauer said. 

    US prosecutors argue that Trump was acting as a candidate, not a president when he pressured officials to overturn the election results and encouraged his supporters to march to the Capitol. 

    US District Judge, Tanya Chutkan, who is to preside over Trump’s trial, rejected his immunity claim last month and the judges who heard the former president’s appeal on Tuesday also appeared to be unconvinced by the argument. 

    “I think it’s paradoxical to say that his constitutional duty ‘to take care that the laws be faithfully executed’ allows him to violate criminal laws,” said Judge Karen Henderson, an appointee of former Republican president, George HW Bush.

     “You’re saying a president could sell pardons, could sell military secrets, could tell SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival?” Judge Florence Pan asked Sauer.

     Sauer insisted that even in this case, the president could only be prosecuted if first impeached and convicted by Congress.

    Read Also: Trump ineligible to run for president over capitol attack role, court rules

     James Pearce, an attorney for the US Department of Justice, called that an “extraordinarily frightening” prospect and said it would allow a president to resign before being impeached and escape punishment.

     Pushing back against the immunity claim, Pearce said Trump’s conduct was unprecedented.

     “Never before has there been allegations that a sitting president has with private individuals and using the levers of power sought to fundamentally subvert the democratic republic and the electoral system. The president has a unique constitutional role, but he is not above the law.” Pearce said.

    Special Counsel, Jack Smith, who brought the case against Trump, is eager to get the case to trial before November’s election. The case has been put on hold for the appeal.

    Trump’s lawyers are not only seeking to dismiss the case but are also hoping to benefit from a protracted appeals process that could delay the trial past its scheduled March start date, even potentially after the election.

    It’s not clear how quickly the court will rule on the appeal, but court representatives have signaled that they intend to work quickly.

  • Trump ineligible to run for president over capitol attack role, court rules

    Trump ineligible to run for president over capitol attack role, court rules

    The Colorado’s Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that former United States President, Donald Trump, is ineligible to run for the White House because of his role in the 2021 assault on the Capitol by his supporters and should be removed from the state’s primary ballot.

    The historic decision based on the 14th Amendment, barring Trump from the presidential primary ballot, sets up a battle before the nation’s highest court about the fate of next year’s election.

    The ruling applies only to the state’s March 5 Republican primary, but its conclusion would likely also affect Trump’s status for the Nov. 5 general election. Nonpartisan U.S. election forecasters view Colorado as safely Democratic, meaning that President Joe Biden will likely carry the state regardless of Trump’s fate.

    In a 4-3 ruling that will soon be appealed — and that is likely to inspire fierce criticism from Trump’s supporters and vocal applause from those who have condemned his behavior around Jan. 6 — a majority of Colorado’s seven justices wrote that the former president “engaged in insurrection.”

    “President Trump’s direct and express efforts, over several months, exhorting his supporters to march to the Capitol to prevent what he falsely characterized as an alleged fraud on the people of this country were indisputably overt and voluntary,” the justices wrote.

    Read Also: Nigeria must prepare for Trump

    “Moreover,” they wrote, “the evidence amply showed that President Trump undertook all these actions to aid and further a common unlawful purpose that he himself conceived and set in motion: prevent Congress from certifying the 2020 presidential election and stop the peaceful transfer of power.”

    In light of this, the ruling states, “[W]e conclude that because President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three, it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Secretary to list President Trump as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot.”

    The justices stayed their ruling until Jan. 4, pending appeal.

    Three of the judges dissented: Chief Justice Brian D. Boatright and Justices Carlos A. Samour Jr. and Maria E. Berkenkotter.

    Boatright, in his dissent, wrote that the “absence of an insurrection-related conviction” against Trump should have called for the case to be dismissed.

    Samour wrote that the majority’s opinion “flies in the face of the due process doctrine.”

    The ruling follows a monthslong challenge in Colorado to Trump’s ballot eligibility under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, a Civil War-era constitutional clause that deems former office-holders ineligible from running again if they took an oath to support the Constitution and then engaged in “insurrection or rebellion” against the U.S.

  • Nigeria must prepare for Trump

    Nigeria must prepare for Trump

    Hopefully, ex-president Donald Trump of the United States will not return to office next year as he desperately wishes. His eccentricities, bigotry, lack of profundity, and racist inclination did a lot to undermine the image of his country and the world order in his first four tumultuous years in office. Recognised by many even in the US as a narcissist of the first rank, Mr Trump will not be expected to change his worldview, nor his unpredictability. His failings gave nightmares to America’s European allies in NATO, and incensed his neighbours to the north and south of North America. By the time of his exit, he had rendered international relations so fraught and tentative that the world waited with baited breath for his next apocalyptic action or statement.

    Read Also: Donald Trump gag order reinstated in New York civil fraud trial

    In all this, his contempt for Africa was loaded and exemplary. As Nigeria tries to reset its economy after years of ineptitude and depredation, a hostile, indifferent and unpredictable US president could be very beffudling. Should he win, there will be consequences for Africa and Nigeria. There is sometimes wisdom in getting to the bridge before crossing it; but given Nigeria’s economic crisis and the social ferment brewing below the surface, it is not out of place to plan for the uncertainties ahead. Nigeria should find out in what ways it can profit from Mr Trump’s unpredictability, or how to lessen the impact of his wild assumptions and indiscriminate verbal and policy attacks. To be forewarned is to be forearmed. The rest of the world, including Russia and China, must already be planning for Mr Trump’s second coming in case US voters are unable to stop him. Nigeria should not be caught napping.   

  • Trump to remain on 2024 primary ballot after judge dismisses lawsuit

    Trump to remain on 2024 primary ballot after judge dismisses lawsuit

    A judge in Colorado has rejected an attempt to bar former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 Republican presidential primary.

    It ends a landmark trial over a lawsuit that argued Mr Trump’s actions leading up to the 2021 Capitol riot render him ineligible to hold office again.

    Similar challenges, based on a US Civil War-era constitutional amendment, have also failed in three other states.

    Mr Trump, who did not appear at the hearing, has dismissed the effort.

    District Judge Sarah Wallace issued the ruling on Friday, requiring that the Colorado secretary of state place Mr Trump on the state’s primary ballot next year.

    Section three of the 14th Amendment bars from office those who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” against it.A group of Colorado voters filed a legal challenge in September, arguing the amendment should apply to Mr Trump and his involvement in the 2021 riot at the US Capitol.

    But Ms Wallace disagreed, arguing in her ruling that the 14th amendment’s insurrection ban does not apply to presidents because Section 3 does not explicitly name them.

    “After considering the arguments on both sides, the Court is persuaded that ‘officers of the United States,’ did not include the President of the United States.”

    “[I]t appears to the court that for whatever reason the drafters of Section Three did not intend to include a person who had only taken the presidential oath,” she wrote in her ruling.

    Ms Wallace did find, however, that Mr Trump “engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021 through incitement, and that the First Amendment does not protect Trump’s speech”.

    The ruling is the latest setback for efforts to disqualify Mr Trump from the Republican primary election.

    Similar lawsuits in New Hampshire, Minnesota and Michigan have already failed.

    In a statement issued after the ruling, the left-leaning Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington – which filed the Colorado lawsuit – said it would be filing an appeal to the Colorado Supreme Court shortly.

    The group applauded Ms Wallace’s finding that Mr Trump had engaged in insurrection on 6 January.

    “We are proud to have brought this historic case and know we are right on the facts and right on the law,” the group said. “Today was not the end of this effort, but another step along the way.”

    It comes after a week-long bench trial, during which lawyers for the group of voters who filed the challenge argued Mr Trump had lost the right to run for president again because of his role in the 6 January Capitol riots. Lawyers for the plaintiffs called several witnesses, including two US Capitol Police officers who were injured during the riots.

    Lawyers for Mr Trump, meanwhile, argued he did not bear responsibility for the attacks. They noted that similar legal challenges against the president have been unsuccessful.

    “The petitioners are asking this court to do something that’s never been done in the history of the United States,” said Trump attorney Scott Gessler. “The evidence doesn’t come close to allowing the court to do it.”

    Read Also: Trump criticises Netanyahu as unprepared for Hamas attack on Israel

    The 14th Amendment was ratified after the American Civil War, and Section 3 was deployed to bar secessionists from returning to previous government posts once southern states re-joined the Union.

    It was used against the likes of Confederate president Jefferson Davis and his vice-president Alexander Stephens, both of whom had served in Congress, but has seldom been invoked since.

    The legal strategy has picked up steam since August, when Mr Trump was accused of election subversion in two separate criminal cases.

    It is unclear if future challenges to Mr Trump’s name on the ballot will emerge in Colorado or other states ahead of the Republican primary and the general election.

    Legal experts believe the case or another like it is likely to end up before the US Supreme Court.

    BBC

  • Trump’s banana republic

    Trump’s banana republic

    Donald Trump, 77, likely Republican Party nominee for president in 2024, always talks like a child.

    Republicans, in the US House of Representatives, bickering as wayward children or worse, wilful adults, voted out their Speaker, Kevin MacCarthy, on October 3.  They boast a tiny majority (221 to 212) over the House Democrats.

    It was the first time in US history that a Speaker would be ousted.  In 1900, there was an attempt to do just that but that vote was defeated. 

    McCarthy, if he doesn’t put himself up for vote again, or he does but faces defeat, will be the shortest serving US Speaker ever — 269 days. 

    Earlier, at his bruising election, the vote had had to go an unprecedented 15 rounds.  Still, he wouldn’t prevail until succumbing to office-suicide change of rules on the Republican side, which subjected him to the pleasure of Republican MAGA — make America great again — extremists.

    That ‘ruling’ MAGA minority of eight, led by Matt Gaetz, eventually played the maga — pidgin lingo for sucker — on him: they not only pooled the vote that made him Speaker; they also pulled the trigger that ousted him.  A perfect MAGA chaos!

    Welcome to Donald Trump’s emerging Banana Republic! 

    It’s being undone by the Republicans themselves — can you imagine a lunatic son setting fire to the roof of his father’s thatched hut in dry harmattan? 

    For the Republicans to fall upon own swords, the Democrats were too happy to play cynical Machiavelli — “donating” their entire votes, added to minority Republicans’, to oust poor McCarthy!  Will Uncle Sam even recognize himself again?  What high shame!

    Read Also: Trump fraud case trial begins

    Incidentally, as the macabre House drama was playing out, Trump, in a New York court docked for a civil charge of sexing up his net worth to corral illicit business for his Trump Organization, was recklessly running his mouth, traducing court officials.

    For an alleged civil infraction that took place years ago, Trump blabbed the court proceedings were an “election interfering” political game specifically designed to put his nose out of joint, while he guns for the Republican presidential nomination! 

    Election-interfering — what an irony!  A man that lost the presidential election in 2020 but brazenly lied he won — and still lying, thus gravely undermining the most sacred crux of American democracy  — stakes a laughable claim on election interference!

    But away from Trump, perhaps America’s most famous — or notorious? — man-child, McCarthy was ousted for what should, pre-Trump, have been hailed by all as nobility.

    Earlier, MacCarthy had struck a deal with President Joe Biden to pass a money law, so that America wouldn’t default on its debt obligations, thus averting a global economic crisis.  Then, a few days ago, he struck a bi-partisan bill, with the House Democrats, to avert a government shutdown. 

    The Republican MAGA anarchists would rather call both bluffs and let heavens fall — and for that twin-reason, MacCarthy must go!

    With this MAGA power chaos, and with the 2024 elections looming in the horizon, will Americans trust the party of Abe Lincoln, now hijacked by Trump and his MAGA base, with power any time soon?

    That’s for the American electorate to say.  One thing is clear, though: Trump is driving an American decline.  The folks out there had better jerk awake before it’s too late!