Tag: Trump

  • Trump and Nigerian migrants

    Trump and Nigerian migrants

    Recently I was a witness to a heated debate on the report by the authoritative New York Times, which quoted President Donald Trump of USA as making disparaging remarks about Nigerian immigrants living in USA. The debate took place at the popular Staff Club of the University of Ibadan, that redoubtable intellectual citadel of the country. Here I will like to say, that the club for years has been noted not only for relaxation but as a veritable spot on the campus for robust in-depth discussions of both current local and international affairs. The authoritative newspaper reported that President Trump said that Nigerian immigrants after coming to USA would never return to ‘their huts’ and many of the discussants despite the denial of the report by the White Officials in Washington said many unprintable things about Trump for this reported unguarded statement. A minority group among the discussants, while they showed disdain for Trump, felt that we should look beyond the insults by Trumps that abodes in Nigeria are huts. This group argued that we should rather focus on the reasons why young Nigerians and other youths from Africa now flock to other countries, which in some cases are poorer than their own countries in search of better life.

    Personally I think Donald Trump with his worn-out slogan of making ‘America great again’, will eventually bring down his country. I have a feeling that the great global power and influence attained by the USA after Second World War would soon be a thing of history as a result of the misadventure and irrational policies of USA under Trump towards other countries of the world. China is now poised to take over from USA as the greatest power in the world. In fact, the recent book titled Fire and Fury by Michael Wolff who studied the chaos in Trump’s White House for almost a year is convincing many people in USA that the mental state of President Trump is slipping. This is frightening and it is a pity that that the USA with all its might and greatness is under this unstable personality.

    Since inception of mankind, migration of people from one place to another has always been an important human endeavour. We read in the Bible how Abraham was told in Genesis 12 to leave his country, his relatives and father’s house and go to Canaan. Since that time we read stories of people moving from one place to another place. Recently Pope Francis told the world that in Judeo-Christian tradition, the history of Salvation is essentially the history of migration. Many reasons have been proffered to be responsible for migration of people. In recent times, religious, political and economic reasons are the main ingredients responsible for people to leave their God-given abode to go and settle in an alien abode.

    The religious persecutions in Britain in the 17th century made the Puritans known as the Pilgrims to migrate to the new world now the USA. They were transported in the ship known as ‘Mayflower’ which sailed from Plymouth in England in 1620. As for economic migration, we have many examples in history. The Irish potato famine known as the great famine or the great hunger which ravaged Ireland with mass starvation and diseases led many people in Ireland to migrate to USA between 1845 and 1849. This singular event was responsible for the present sizeable population of Irish descendants in USA. The Jews, the Italians and other citizens of European countries also fled to the Americas as economic refugees. The founding of Australia started in 1788 when 11 British ships carried convicts to new colony of New South Wales. This movement was triggered off by economic problem in Britain at that time. Colonialism despite the gloss put on it by its perpetrators was geared to move people around for economic benefits of the people of the colonising power. To me colonialism is nothing more than economic migration in disguise. Migrations as a result of political upheavals and wars are very common in human history. The two great world wars saw a lot of migrations of people all over the globe. During the Second World War, many Europeans fled Nazi Germany to Britain and USA in order to flee from Nazi atrocities. After the war, many of the Nazi supporters during the war fled and migrated to Latin America especially Argentina. Migration of people with attendant refugee problem as a result of many political upheavals in Africa is an intractable problem now facing United Nations Organization in many parts of Africa.

    In its colourful history, USA has always welcome millions of migrants from other parts of the world especially from European countries. Apart from the blacks, who originally came to USA against their wishes in slave ships, other nationalities came to USA on their own to escape religious and political persecutions and to seek better life. It is on record that the family of Trump’s mother originally came from Scotland. As written above, there is nothing wrong for people including Nigerians to migrate to other countries. What is troubling in case of Nigeria and other African countries is the alarming rate at which African youths who are the future of the continent are leaving in droves to other countries in search of the so-called green pastures. Some of them, especially Nigerian youths both males and females, take horrendous risks to leave their countries. Presently, we are witnessing dehumanizing treatment given to our youths at the slave market in Libya and the untimely and needless death suffered by our youths in Mediterranean Sea.

    Nigerians should not have been made to suffer this demeaning agony if our leaders present and past, had been less selfish and had vision to manage judiciously our God-given resources for the future generation. In recent times, Lew Kew Yew did this for Singapore, and Mahathir Mohamad did the same thing for Malaysia. Nigeria should be an El Dorado for its citizens especially the youths because the country is well endowed. When most African countries attained independence in the 60s, there was hope for black people all over the world. Many black people outside the continent especially those in USA planned to come back to Africa so as to escape racism and discrimination which were their lots in the hand of the white people. Many of them wanted to revive the vision of Marcus Garvey who in the 20s advocated the movement of the black people from The Americas back to their roots in Africa. W. E. B. Du Bois, another black human right leader in USA relocated to Ghana when the country attained independence to live permanently.

    The above dream of black people in diaspora evaporated because Africa did not live up to their expectations, as soon after independence, many African countries were wracked with political instability, economic dislocation, ethnic strife, religious warfare and other vices that had tied Africa down. African countries despite their endowments could not provide decent standard of living for the people. Some of them became virtually bankrupt and depended on aids from other countries most of which are less endowed. The lofty dream at independence was replaced with nightmare and African youths now go for better lives outside the shores of the continent. This prompted Henry Louis Gates Junior , the well-known African American historian to write that if slave ships are now brought back to Africa, many youths would willing enter the ships to go and serve as slaves in USA instead of staying in their countries which are nothing but hell to them.

    The present economic situation in Africa is dire. It is pathetic and things have to change for better as we Africans cannot continue to waste the most vibrant segment of our population who are dying daily in their efforts to escape economic scourge in Africa. It has to be said however, that Nigerian migrants despite the fact that most of them do not return home as Trump was quoted as saying, are making significant contributions to the development of USA because of the enabling environment which unfortunately is absent in Nigeria. The pity is that no one can see any serious effort being made by our rulers to improve the enabling environment in the country so as to encourage our people in USA and other places to come home and replicate the good things they are doing in those places.

    • Professor Lucas writes from Old Bodija, Ibadan.
  • I’m a very  stable genius, declares Trump

    I’m a very stable genius, declares Trump

    President Donald Trump has dismissed all allegations stating he is unfit to be president and proclaiming himself to be a “very stable genius”. The US president hit back after an explosive account of life at the White House claimed he never intended to enter the Oval Office and his staff believed he was not fit to hold high office.

    The publication of Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House by Michael Wolff has already provoked a very public rift with his former strategist, Steve Bannon, who was one of the main sources of the book.

    In his latest online onslaught, Trump accused his critics of trying to make an issue of his “mental stability and intelligence”. “Now that Russian collusion, after one year of intense study, has proven to be a total hoax on the American public, the Democrats and their lapdogs, the Fake News Mainstream Media, are taking out the old Ronald Reagan playbook and screaming mental stability and intelligence,” he wrote in a series of trademark tweets. “Actually, throughout my life, my two greatest assets have been mental stability and being, like, really smart. Crooked Hillary Clinton also played these cards very hard and, as everyone knows, went down in flames. “I went from very successful businessman to top TV star to President of the United States (on my first try). I think that would qualify as not smart, but genius…and a very stable genius at that!” Dysfunctional presidency As the book shot to the top of the online bestseller lists in the US, White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders continued to dismiss the claims of a dysfunctional presidency which have gripped the American public. Speaking on US television on Friday, she said that Wolff had never interviewed Trump despite having “repeatedly begged to see the president”, describing him as “a guy who made up a lot of stories to try and sell books”. Wolff, however, insisted that he “absolutely” spoke to the president, adding whether he “realised it was an interview or not, I don’t know, but it was certainly not off the record.”

     

  • Trump’s denigration of Nigeria

    Trump’s denigration of Nigeria

    SIR: President Donald Trump recently denigrated Nigerians both at home and in diaspora with his snide remarks on the proclivity of Nigerians to overstay in the U.S. beyond the period prescribed in their visas.

    The U.S and other European countries have become the destination choice of millions of Nigerians who usually migrate through series of devil-may-care methods and when they lawful migrate, they tend fail to return to their country.

    The twitter-in-chief president of America, Donald Trump made a sweeping generalisation about Nigerians, failing to acknowledge the residency of thousands of Nigerian professionals who have legal residence status in the United States, whose professional inputs have contributed to the greatness of America.

    On the flipside, however, President Trump’s derogatory generalisation could be perceived with some measure of factuality given the state of the Nigerian nation. I’m sure most Nigerians in diaspora would hardly fault Trump on his pejorative downgrade of Nigeria with derogatory epithet of inhabiting huts.

    A hut is a small, single-storey house or shelter, a depiction of a glorified shanty.

    Trump was not remiss to describe the most populous black nation as a republic of infrastructural shanties, not because he has visited any African country in his life, but rather could conjecture the gravity of underdevelopment from the slavish exodus of Nigerians into the U.S and other European countries coupled with the recent scandalous slave trade in Libya that puts Nigeria on spotlight of infamy.

    President Trump must also be aware of the quantum of stolen Nigeria’s commonwealth domiciled in U.S banks, and traceable to affluent cluster of American real estate.

    President Trump is not alone in this diplomatic denigration of Nigeria, President Obama’s only official visit to the continent of Africa deliberately excluded Nigeria from his itinerary. Obama found it most repugnant to visit a nation laden with corruption and state sponsored thievery.

    The whole world watches Nigeria in her trajectory of reversed development that perpetually puts her citizens in a vulnerable state of refugee status.

    Nigerian leaders including President Buhari have not grasped the depth of depravity the nation has sunk into partly because of the insensate privilege attached to their offices and partly because they approach governance with vision and mission that fails to pass the reducible minimum in global standard.

    For Nigeria to overcome this negative global image, there must be a transparent approach to governance at all levels of government.

    The same resources deployed to make Dubai (UAE) what it is have been pillaged in Nigeria and nothing seems to have changed especially at the states and local government levels.

    • Bukola Ajisola,

    bukymany@yahoo.com

  • Trump demands border wall, visa changes as part of immigration fix

    Trump demands border wall, visa changes as part of immigration fix

    U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday said he would not consider reinstating an immigration programme that protected young people from deportation without commitment from democrats to help build a wall on the border with Mexico and end certain immigration programmes.

    The debate on immigration will be a pivotal issue in Washington in early 2018 ahead of midterm congressional elections in November.

    In September, Trump ended the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) programme, which protected young people from deportation, who had been brought to the U.S. illegally as children, and gave Congress until March to devise a long-term solution.

    Democrats have pushed for DACA to continue, but Trump, a Republican, has said that would not happen without the end to various visa programmes and the construction of a wall along the southern U.S. border.

    “The Democrats have been told, and fully understand, that there can be no DACA without the desperately needed WALL at the Southern Border and an END to the horrible Chain Migration & ridiculous Lottery System of Immigration etc,” Trump posted on Twitter on Friday.

    Representatives for Senate Democratic Leader, Chuck Schumer and House Democratic Leader, Nancy Pelosi said they would not negotiate the issue in the media but looked forward to serious talks after lawmakers return to work in Washington early January.

    The Senate is set to resume its work Jan. 3 while the U.S. House of Representatives restarts its session Jan. 8.

    Trump promised to build a border wall as a presidential candidate and has continued to press for it publicly.

    He has also called for an additional “merit based” assessment for U.S. visa recipients.

  • Trump: Nigerians  live in huts, Haitians  ‘all have AIDS’

    Trump: Nigerians live in huts, Haitians ‘all have AIDS’

    •He did not say so – White House Press Secretary

    How much regard does President Donald Trump of the United States of America (USA) have for Nigerians?

    Not much, going by a special report yesterday by the authoritative New York Times on the style of the American leader.

    The newspaper, in the report on Trump’s harsh immigration policy, described how he denigrated Nigerians at a meeting with his officials at a meeting in June.

    The meeting had been called to discuss the immigration policy which he had introduced to stop travellers from several Muslim countries from entering the United States in a dramatic demonstration of how he would deliver on his campaign promise to fortify the nation’s borders.

    The policy was later voided by the court.

    Trump was said to have hit the roof   after he was handed a list of foreigners who had been granted visas to enter the U.S. in 2017.

    Forty thousand of such were Nigerians.

    A fuming Trump, according to officials present at the meeting, said once they had seen the US they would never “go back to their huts” in Africa.

    He also had unkind words for Haitians who had sent 15,000 people.

    They “all have AIDS,” he reportedly grumbled.

    He branded Afghanistan, which had 2,500 of its citizens getting US visa, a terrorist haven.

    The NYT said: “As the meeting continued, John F. Kelly, then the secretary of homeland security, and Rex W. Tillerson, the secretary of state, tried to interject, explaining that many were short-term travellers making one-time visits. But as the president continued, Mr. Kelly and Mr. Miller turned their ire on Mr. Tillerson, blaming him for the influx of foreigners and prompting the secretary of state to throw up his arms in frustration. If he was so bad at his job, maybe he should stop issuing visas altogether, Mr. Tillerson fired back.

    “Tempers flared and Mr. Kelly asked that the room be cleared of staff members. But even after the door to the Oval Office was closed, aides could still hear the president berating his most senior advisers.”

    The White House swiftly responded to the publication yesterday, saying Trump had not used such language although it did not dispute the thrust of the conversation in question.

    Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said : “General Kelly, General McMaster, Secretary Tillerson, Secretary Nielsen and all other senior staff actually in the meeting deny these outrageous claims. It’s both sad and telling The New York Times would print the lies of their anonymous ‘sources’ anyway.”

     

     

  • Iran says Trump cannot cause collapse of nuclear deal

    Iran says Trump cannot cause collapse of nuclear deal

    Iran said on Tuesday U.S. President Donald Trump cannot cause its nuclear deal with six major powers to collapse.

    “The nuclear deal will not collapse… Those who hope that Trump will cause its collapse, are wrong,” Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said in a speech broadcast live on State TV.

    In October, Trump declined to certify that Iran was complying with the nuclear agreement reached among Tehran, the U.S. and other powers in 2015.

    His decision triggered a 60-day window for Congress to decide whether to bring back sanctions on Iran.

    Congress passed the ball back to Trump by letting the deadline on reimposing sanctions on Iran passed on Dec. 12.

    Read Also: Putin backs Iran nuclear deal, visits seen as rejection of U.S. policy

    Trump must decide in mid-January if he wants to continue to waive energy sanctions on Iran.

    Under the deal, nuclear-related sanctions imposed on Iran were lifted in 2016, in return for Tehran curbing its nuclear programme.

    Iran has said it will stick to the accord as long as the other signatories respect it, but will “shred” the deal if Washington pulls out.

    NAN reports that Iran says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes and denies it has aimed to build an atomic bomb.

    It has said it will stick to the accord as long as the other signatories respect it, but will “shred” the deal if Washington pulls out.

  • ISIS threatens U.S. over Jerusalem decision

    ISIS threatens U.S. over Jerusalem decision

    Islamic State of Iraq and Syria ( ISIS )has threatened attacks on U.S. soil in retaliation for the Trump administration’s decision to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

    One of the group’s social media accounts reported on Thursday without much details on one of its accounts on the Telegram instant messaging service titled: “Wait for us” and “ISIS in Manhattan”.

    The group said that it would carry out operations and showed images of New York’s Times Square and what appeared to be an explosive bomb belt and detonator.

    “We will do more ops in your land, until the final hour and we will burn you with the flames of war which you started in Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Syria and Afghan. Just you wait.

    “The recognition of your dog ‘Trump’ (sic) Jerusalem as the capital of Israel will make us recognise explosives as the capital of your country,” it said.

    Washington triggered widespread anger and protests across the Arab world with its decision on Jerusalem.

    The disputed city is revered by Jews, Christians and Muslims alike, and is home to Islam’s third holiest site.

    It has been at the heart of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for decades.

    Read also: UAE urges Arabs, Muslims to unite over U.S decision on Jerusalem

    Islamic State was driven out of its Iraqi and Syrian capitals this year and squeezed into a shrinking pocket of desert straddling the border between the two countries.

    The forces fighting Islamic State in Iraq and Syria now expect a new phase of guerrilla warfare there.

    Militants including people claiming allegiance to Islamic State have carried out scores of deadly attacks in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia and the U.S. over the past two years.

    NAN

  • Trump to undergo physical examination early 2018

    Trump to undergo physical examination early 2018

    The White House has said that U.S. President Donald Trump will undergo a physical examination while promising to allow the results to be released.

    Trump will be examined by a doctor at Walter Reed, a military medical center, “scheduled for the first part of 2018,” said White House press secretary Sarah Sanders.

    “Those records will be released by the doctor following that taking place,” she added.

    Sanders’s announcement came a day after Trump appeared to get a dry mouth and slurred his words when delivering remarks on Wednesday, leading to questions about the president’s health.

    “There were a lot of questions on that, frankly pretty ridiculous questions,” Sanders said.

    “The president’s throat was dry. Nothing more than that.”

    Trump’s predecessors typically underwent annual physical examinations with a military doctor and had details of their examination results released to the public.

    It is the first time that the White House has committed to releasing medical records about Trump’s health. Trump, 71, is the oldest U.S. president at this point in his tenure.

    In 2016, Trump released a clean bill of health but some pointed out that the record lacked details and had an over-the-top portrait of the president’s health condition.(Xinhua/NAN)

  • Trump, strongman of America!

    Trump, strongman of America!

    Before Donald Trump was sworn in as US president in January this year, the phrase “American strongman” would have seemed utterly ludicrous, if not downright oxymoronic. Why? Americans have for so long prided themselves in the sophistication of their liberal democratic system of government, on the assumed integrity of their elected leaders to always conform to established time-tested democratic norms, and on the strength and vitality of their state institutions to impartially and objectively coax their leaders to exhibit civilized conduct. These are the veritable assumptions that have been sold to the rest of the world and it explains why the US is often held up as the exemplar or archetypal liberal democracy. Americans have carefully cultivated this image and patented it so well that their public officials often arrogantly lecture and even chastise the rest of the world on the basis that their democratic system is the perfect example to be emulated. And for decades, people of the developing nations have had to endure lectures, insults, harangues and condescending treatment by US political and diplomatic officials who swagger all over the continents delivering elementary lectures on democratic governance.

    What exactly is the point in all this? Am I implying that democracy is not good? Of course not! It is just that we have all been so starry-eyed, possibly deceived, by all the stated qualities of American democracy to the point that we accept American government as the veritable yardstick for measuring liberal democratic performance. That’s not necessarily bad. However, we ought to be more skeptical of received knowledge, be more nuanced and critical in our acceptance of received wisdom. Democracy is good, and I align myself with the late Professor Claude Ake’s submission that that though democracy may not necessarily solve all our national problems but none of our problems can begin to be solved without democracy. So democracy must stay. My point here is that, as a system of governing society, democracy has to be adapted suitably to the local conditions in each place, not adopted without the necessary modifications. Anyway, this piece is not a discourse on the tenets of democracy but about what I think is the assumed resiliency and capacity of US state institutions to checkmate their presidents from becoming imperious strongmen.

    Let’s face it, hardly any American president is a saint when it comes to behaving badly and against established norms, but none, perhaps with the exception of Richard Nixon, has been as whimsical, willful and deliberate in subverting the institutions of the state for personal reasons as much as Donald J. Trump. In less than one year in office, he has twisted American governance system out of shape, serially attacked the military and security establishment, derided the US Congress and unleashed vitriolic verbal and Twitter assaults on legislators, insulted the judiciary, and harangued the mass media as purveyors of fake news. Many are perplexed at how one man can so egregiously subvert the essence of democratic governance virtually unchecked. He is a serial liar, egomaniac, and wantonly disrespectful of protocol and civilized behaviour. Now Americans are having a taste of one-man dictatorship, or what I here call “democratic despotism” that we in Africa have endured for decades since most of our countries gained independence in the 1960s. Donald Trump was democratically elected and is therefore expected to govern also democratically, but he is without question a despot at heart, hence the appropriateness of the phrase.

    The oxymoron, “democratic despotism,” is intended. Truly, there are democrats and there are despots, but when a democrat rules like a despot, he becomes a democratic despot! This is the only way I can characterize President Trump’s conduct since January. Though a democratically elected as leader of the world’s most powerful democracy, his conduct thus far generally exemplifies the characteristics of an autocrat, a veritable third world ‘strong man.’ He has deliberately and methodically tried to weaken and subvert every institution that he does not like or cannot yet bend to his will. This is not as strange as it seems. Instead, it is vintage Donald Trump: ruthless business mogul, egomaniacal host of a reality television show. An exasperated David Remnick, editor of The New Yorker, calling Trump’s election “An American Tragedy” wrote on November 9, 2016, the day after the US presidential election:

    “The election of Donald Trump to the Presidency is nothing less than a tragedy for the American republic, a tragedy for the Constitution, and a triumph for the forces, at home and abroad, of nativism, authoritarianism, misogyny, and racism. Trump’s shocking victory, his ascension to the Presidency is a sickening event in the history of the United States and liberal democracy.”

    Almost one year into his tenure, I fail to see that anything can be taken away from Remnick’s graphically unflattering portrayal of an American tragedy. In less than one year, Trump has single-handedly taught the world more about the hidden hypocrisies of liberal democracy, about how democracy is actually despotism in disguise, about how easy it is for democratically elected but autocratically-inclined individuals to systematically subvert its theoretical and practical essences by routine demagoguery and by casually ignoring so-called established institutions, or simply rendering them irrelevant and toothless. Is there any major US institution left that he has not yet ridiculed or subverted…the judiciary, individual judges, the national security and intelligence community, the Congress, the GOP on which ticket he climbed to power, name it! And what about the mass media! He calls the mainstream media “fake media” and at one time advocated jailing of journalists.

    Donald Trump has proven to be a compulsive liar, an egomaniac who routinely discountenances inconvenient truths and relies on what his aides casually refer to as ‘alternative facts’, casually snubs foreign leaders that he doesn’t like, treats others with condescension as if they are mere employees of Trump Towers who must genuflect before him, acts whimsically and eccentrically without requisite knowledge or deep understanding of critical issues, and luxuriates in his self-delusion of imperial grandeur and power. This guy is simply uncouth and ill-mannered, celebrates fellow ‘democratic autocrats’ like Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, Fatah el-Sisi of Egypt and Rodrigo Duterte of Philippines as ‘great’ leaders. He daily exudes intellectual shallowness and a lack of the elementary finesse and political sophistication usually associated with American presidents. It is difficult to disagree with those who have written him off as profoundly bereft of the most rudimentary gravitas for high public office.

    All these remind one of some of Europe’s infamous 20th century despots like Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin, Antonio de Oliveira Salazar in their eerie resemblance to today’s Donald Trump. In reality, he is the very exemplar of what the late eminent Professor Gabriel Olusanya would have called an “Area Boy Diplomat”! One should not be surprised if Americans who voted him into office as their president are already secretly regretting their bad judgement. I can wager that by the time he completes his first four years, America’s liberal democratic system would have been so comprehensively bent out of shape it would hardly be recognizable any more. As I once asserted in an earlier piece in this newspaper, Americans may deserve Donald Trump because they elected him, but the rest of the world could certainly do without this monstrosity of a modern-day Nebuchadnezzar.

    The good thing about this sordid development in modern American governance, as Professor Bolaji Akinyemi once pointed out, is that it will temper the arrogance of American diplomats who enjoy lecturing the rest of the world on democratic behaviour. President Donald Trump is such a bad advertisement for democratic leadership that even veritable African despots are beginning to look like tame.

     

    • Prof Fawole writes from Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife.
  • Trump to recognize Jerusalem as Israel capital

    Trump to recognize Jerusalem as Israel capital

    President Donald Trump on Wednesday will recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and set in motion the relocation of the U.S. Embassy to the ancient city, senior U.S. officials said.

    The decision would upend decades of U.S. policy and risks fueling violence in the Middle East.

    Facing an outcry of opposition from Arab capitals, Trump, in a landmark speech, will announce he has ordered the State Department to begin developing a plan to move the embassy from Tel Aviv in what is expected to be a process that takes three to four years, the officials said.

    He will not set a timetable for the move.

    Trump will sign a national security waiver that authorizes him to delay the embassy relocation for now, since the U.S. diplomats do not yet have a building in Jerusalem to move into, security arrangements or housing for diplomats, the officials said.

    Still, Trump’s endorsement of Israel’s claim to all of Jerusalem as its capital would reverse long-standing U.S. policy that the city’s status must be decided in negotiations with the Palestinians.

    The Palestinian wants East Jerusalem as the capital of their future state.

    The international community does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over the entire city, home to sites holy to the Muslim, Jewish and Christian religions.

    The officials, who briefed reporters ahead of Trump’s speech at 1 p.m. EST (1800 GMT) on Wednesday, insisted that Trump’s decision, intended to fulfill a key campaign promise.

    The officials said it was not meant to pre-judge the outcome of eventual talks on the final status of Jerusalem or other major disputes between the two sides.

    Instead, one of the officials contended that Trump’s announcements reflected the “historic reality” of Jerusalem as the center of Jewish faith and the “modern reality” that it is the seat of Israeli government.

    Such arguments are not likely to sway the Palestinians and the broader Arab world.

    Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Jordan’s King Abdullah, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and Saudi Arabia’s King Salman, all received telephone calls from Trump on Tuesday.

    They, however, joined a mounting chorus of voices warning that unilateral U.S. steps on Jerusalem would derail a fledgling U.S.-led peace effort that has stymied previous U.S. administrations and unleash turmoil in the region.

    The White House said Trump had also spoken with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a close U.S. ally and longtime proponent of a U.S. embassy move to Jerusalem.

    Netanyahu was the only leader whose office did not release a statement following the call.

    A senior Israeli minister welcomed Trump’s decision while vowing that Israel would be prepared for any outbreak of violence.

    Trump appears intent on satisfying the pro-Israel, right-wing base, including evangelical Christians, that helped him win the presidency but was disappointed when he delayed the embassy move in June.

    No other country has its embassy in Jerusalem.

    Israel captured Arab East Jerusalem in the 1967 Middle East war and later annexed it, an action not recognized internationally.

    But Trump’s decision could also upset the peace effort led by his son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner, in pursuit of what the U.S. president has called the “ultimate deal”.

    Still, internal deliberations over the status of Jerusalem were tense.

    Vice President Mike Pence and David Friedman, U.S. ambassador to Israel, pushed hard for both recognition and embassy relocation.

    Meanwhile, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Defense Secretary Jim Mattis opposed the move from Tel Aviv, according to other U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    An impatient Trump finally weighed in, telling aides last week he wanted to keep his campaign promise.

    Read Also: Melania Trump highlights tradition in White House Christmas decor